Epidural Catheter Research Articles

Effect of dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus on labor analgesia: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial

Background: Labor analgesia can be achieved by different approaches. The efficacy and safety of combined dural puncture epidural (DPE) with program intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) are not well characterized. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DPE combined with PIEB vs epidural (EP) combined with PIEB for labor analgesia. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial. Eligible pregnant nulliparous women received either DPE combined with PIEB (group D) or epidural combined with PIEB (group E) for labor analgesia. Analgesia was initiated with 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.3 µg/mL sufentanil and maintained with PIEB at 12 mL/h. Primary outcome was the proportion of women with adequate analgesia within 10 minutes after the initiation of analgesics. Secondary outcomes (time to achieve analgesia, time to first request for additional analgesic, proportion of women required additional analgesic or epidural catheter adjustment and resetting, total labor duration, total analgesic consumption, level of anesthesia, and motor block), side effects, and patient satisfaction were also documented. Results: Out of 174 enrolled women, 160 were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The proportion of women who achieved adequate analgesia in group D was significantly greater than that in group E (38.8% vs 20.0%, P < .05). Compared with group E, group D also showed advantages in faster adequate analgesic achievement, more likely to reach adequate analgesia, a longer time to maintain analgesia, lesser requirements for additional analgesic, and better sensory blocks. There were no significant inter-group differences in other outcome measures. Conclusions: Compared with epidural and PIEB mode, DPE and PIEB mode achieved better analgesia without increasing maternal or neonatal side-effects during labor.

The use of a thoracic epidural catheter intra- and postoperatively for an opioid-sparing analgesia in a dog undergoing sternotomy

The use of a thoracic epidural catheter intra- and postoperatively for an opioid-sparing analgesia in a dog undergoing sternotomy

Are labor epidural catheters after a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique more reliable than after a traditional epidural? A retrospective review of 9153 labor epidural catheters.

The combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique may associate with a lower failure rate of epidural catheters compared to traditional epidural catheters. This may be significant for the parturients as failure of neuraxial analgesia has been associated with a negative impact on birth experience. In this one-year retrospective study, the failure rate of epidural catheters was compared between 3201 and 5952 epidural catheters after initiation of neuraxial analgesia by the CSE or traditional epidural technique, respectively. Parturient background information, labor parameters, and neuraxial interventions were collected from 9153 parturients. Failure was defined as replacement of a used epidural catheter by new regional analgesia procedures or general anesthesia during intrapartum cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was the failure rate of epidural catheters. The secondary outcome was the time from the initial analgesia intervention to the epidural catheter replacement and progression of labor during this time. The CSE method was used at an earlier stage of labor, and the parturients were more often primiparous and undergoing induced labor. Earlier onset of analgesia, obesity, induced labor, anesthesiologist experience, and cesarean delivery were found to be significant cofactors for catheter failure. The unadjusted failure rate was 168/3201 (5.2%) and 223/5952 (3.7%) (OR 1.42 [1.16-1.75]) after initiation of analgesia by CSE or traditional epidural method. After controlling for the stage of labor, body mass index, induction of labor, and anesthesiologist's experience level, the adjusted OR for epidural catheter replacement was 1.04 (0.83-1.29) p = .736. The mean (SD) time until epidural catheter failure was 6.3 (4.4) and 4.0 (4.1) hours following initiation of analgesia by CSE or traditional epidural technique, respectively (p < .001). Cervical dilatation progressed from 4.3 (1.4) to 6.4 (2.1) cm and 5.1 (1.5) to 6.7 (1.7) cm between primary neuraxial analgesia and epidural catheter replacement. CSE technique was not associated with a better survival rate of epidural catheters for provision of analgesia or epidural top-up anesthesia for intrapartum CD. In addition, the time to replacement of the catheter was significantly longer when analgesia was initiated with the CSE technique. Maternal satisfaction scores were lower if catheters required replacement.

Epidural Catheter Bacterial Colonization and Infection in a Secondary Portuguese Hospital Setting

Epidural Catheter Bacterial Colonization and Infection in a Secondary Portuguese Hospital Setting

Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique on Management of Breakthrough Pain for Parous Women Receiving Labor Analgesia during Induced Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study assessed the effectiveness of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in managing breakthrough pain in parous women receiving labor analgesia during induced labor. This single-center retrospective cohort study included term pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received treatment for breakthrough pain during labor. All participants underwent induced labor, and some parous women among them underwent DPE. The DPE technique consisted of placing an epidural catheter after dural puncture with a 27-gauge spinal needle. Eligible women were allocated into a DPE group and conventional epidural (CE) anesthesia group. Pain was assessed with a numerical rating scale (NRS), and a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) bolus was administered when the NRS score was ≥3. Breakthrough pain was defined as an NRS score ≥3 during PCEA management. The primary outcome was the efficacy of rescue interventions in managing breakthrough pain, as determined by a reduction in pain intensity to an NRS score <3 before birth. Among the 55 parous women who received labor analgesia, 44 required additional rescue administration for breakthrough pain. Of the remaining women, 23 received DPE and 19 received CE anesthesia. The DPE group experienced significantly more effective relief of breakthrough pain before birth than did the CE group (DPE: 100%; CE: 68.4%; p=0.005). In parous women, DPE anesthesia was more effective than CE anesthesia in providing analgesia for breakthrough pain immediately before delivery during induced labor.

Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter

Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter

Real-Time Ultrasonography for the Placement of Caudal Epidurals for Thoracic Surgery in Infants: A Description of the Technique and Case Series.

Caudal epidural catheters threaded to the thoracic levels are increasingly utilized in infants undergoing thoracic and abdominal surgery, compared to lumbar or thoracic epidural techniques. Estimating catheter length traditionally relies on anatomical landmarks, but the lack of spine ossification in infants makes ultrasonography a valuable and noninvasive tool. We present 3 cases where real-time ultrasonography facilitated caudal to thoracic epidural catheter placement in infants undergoing thoraco-abdominal surgeries. Incision-congruent placement of the catheter tip ensured effective perioperative analgesia with low doses of bupivacaine administered as intermittent boluses resulting in potent and prolonged analgesia with reduced opioid requirements.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy in pregnancy: a narrative review.

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) poses unique challenges for women during pregnancy, necessitating comprehensive care and tailored management strategies. The present narrative review aims to examine the unique challenges and management strategies required for women with LGMD during pregnancy. With over 30 genetic subtypes identified and the potential for additional discoveries through advanced diagnostic techniques, preconception counseling plays a crucial role in informing prospective parents about reproductive risks and available options. Baseline assessments, including cardiac and pulmonary evaluations, are essential to guide antenatal care, alongside genetic testing for precise diagnosis and counseling. Optimizing maternal health through respiratory exercises, cardiac monitoring, and individualized exercise and nutrition plans is paramount to avoid potential complications. During pregnancy, close monitoring of maternal and fetal well-being is important, with collaborative care between obstetricians and specialists. An individualized approach to delivery mode considering factors such as muscle strength, pelvic size, and fetal presentation is crucial. While vaginal delivery has been proven to be possible, the need for an emergency cesarean delivery should always be kept in mind. Regional anesthesia is preferred, with proactive planning for potential respiratory support. Bupivacaine has been shown to be effective with epidural catheters that may be used for prolonged relief with opioids like morphine and fentanyl, while also evaluating the patients' respiratory function. Postpartum considerations include pain management, mobility support, breastfeeding assistance, and emotional support. Early mobilization and tailored physiotherapy regimens may promote optimal recovery, while comprehensive breastfeeding guidance is needed to address challenges related to muscle weakness. Access to mental health resources and support networks is essential to helping individuals cope with the emotional demands of parenthood alongside managing LGMD. By addressing the unique needs of pregnant individuals with LGMD, healthcare providers can optimize maternal and fetal outcomes while supporting individuals in their journey to parenthood.

Comparison of thoracic epidural catheter and continuous peripheral infusion for management of traumatic rib fracture pain.

Thoracic epidural catheters (TECs) are useful adjuncts to multimodal pain regimens in traumatic rib fractures. However, TEC placement is limited by contraindications, patient risk profile, and provider availability. Continuous peripheral infusion of ketamine and/or lidocaine is an alternative that has a modest risk profile and few contraindications. We hypothesized that patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures receiving TECs would have better pain control, in terms of daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and mean pain scores (MPSs) when compared with continuous peripheral infusions of ketamine and/or lidocaine. We retrospectively analyzed traumatic rib fracture admissions to a level 1 trauma center between January 2018 and December 2020. We evaluated two treatment groups: TEC only and continuous infusion only (drip only). A linear mixed-effects model evaluated the association of MME with treatment group. An interaction term of treatment group by time (days 1-7) was included to allow estimating potential time-dependent treatment effect on MME. A zero-inflated Poisson mixed-effects model evaluated the association of treatment with MPS. Both models adjusted for confounders. A total of 1,647 patients were included. After multivariable analysis, a significant, time-varying dose-response relationship between treatment group and MME was found, indicating an opioid-sparing effect favoring the TEC-only group. The opioid-sparing benefit for TEC-only therapy was most prominent at day 3 (27.4 vs 36.5 MME) and day 4 (27.3 vs 36.2 MME) (p < 0.01). The drip-only group had 1.21 times greater MPS than patients with TEC only (p < 0.001). Drip-only analgesia is associated with higher daily MME use and MPS, compared with TEC only. The maximal benefit of TEC therapy appears to be on days 3 and 4. Prospective, randomized comparison between groups is necessary to evaluate the magnitude of the treatment effect. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Why do thoracic epidurals fail? A literature review on thoracic epidural failure and catheter confirmation.

Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been the gold standard of perioperative analgesia in various abdominal and thoracic surgeries. However, misplaced or displaced catheters, along with other factors such as technical challenges, equipment failure, and anatomic variation, lead to a high incidence of unsatisfactory analgesia. This article aims to assess the different sources of TEA failure and strategies to validate the location of thoracic epidural catheters. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was done. The search results were limited to randomized controlled trials. Literature suggests techniques such as electrophysiological stimulation, epidural waveform monitoring, and x-ray epidurography for identifying thoracic epidural placement, but there is no one particular superior confirmation method; clinicians are advised to select techniques that are practical and suitable for their patients and practice environment to maximize success.

Do Previous Multiple Scorpion Bites Produce Resistance to Local Anesthetics Administered Via Repeated Subarachnoid and Epidural Blocks? A Case Report and Review of Available Evidence

Introduction: Failure to achieve a subarachnoid block, even after a second attempt, and the inability to activate epidural analgesia, despite a properly placed catheter, can be both frustrating and perplexing. This case presents a situation where these incidents occurred, and two well-conducted attempts at a subarachnoid block and a properly placed epidural catheter block were unable to produce surgical anesthesia. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old female, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade II, was scheduled for a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. After adequate pre-operative preparation, an epidural catheter was inserted on the morning of surgery, followed by a subarachnoid block with all the proper precautions, which completely failed. After waiting for 10 minutes, the epidural block was activated with a local anesthetic mixture. To our surprise, it also did not produce any desirable effect, so the subarachnoid block was repeated, which again failed to produce any clinical block. Consequently, the surgery had to be conducted under balanced general anesthesia. Recalling previous experience and evidence, a history of scorpion bites was elicited. The patient had a history of multiple encounters (five) and was from a geographical area known to be endemic for scorpions. Conclusions: This case represents another instance of developing resistance to the effects of local anesthetics after exposure to scorpion venom. We believe there is a strong correlation between previous scorpion bites, the number of bites, and the duration between the most recent bite and the development of resistance to local anesthetic agents (LAAs). From a detailed search, it was evident that enough clinical evidence has emerged to irrefutably support this proposal.

Implementation of a standardized epidural top-up algorithm for inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a single-center retrospective study

Background We hypothesized that implementation of a labor epidural management algorithm would increase the labor epidural catheter replacement rate at our hospital. Methods Our institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients who had labor epidural analgesia and delivered vaginally or had replacement of an epidural catheter prior to vaginal delivery from August 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and from August 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 were included in the study. Study investigators entered data from the electronic medical record into REDCap. Results A total of 530 and 740 patients received labor epidural analgesia and met inclusion criteria before and after implementation of the algorithm, respectively. Patients who received labor epidural analgesia after implementation of the protocol had an absolute increase of 1.0% in the catheter replacement rate, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.34). A multivariate logistic regression found that the number or rescue analgesia boluses (odds ratio 2.68; 95% confidence interval 2.092, 3.434; P < 0.001) and operator level of training (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.226, 0.743; P = 0.003) were associated with catheter replacement. Conclusion After implementation of a labor epidural catheter management algorithm, patients had an increase in labor epidural catheter replacement that was not statistically significant.

C-MAC Video Stylet Assisted Endotracheal Intubation in Sedated but Spontaneously Breathing Patients Using Remimazolam and Trachospray Device: A Report of Two Cases

The C-MAC video stylet (Karl Storz KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) is proposed as a successor to the familiar retromolar intubation endoscope. With its flexible tip, it may be especially useful for patients with a limited mouth opening. An awake or sedated airway management technique is often preferred when a difficult airway is anticipated. Due to the challenges in preparation, sedation, topical airway anesthesia and the execution of such an airway management technique itself, these techniques are often clinically underused. The C-MAC video stylet seems to be well suited for an awake or sedated airway approach, as its handling is easier and faster than a flexible fiberscope. It does not exert pressure on the tongue as direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy do. We report two cases of a difficult airway in which intubation was performed by using the C-MAC video stylet in sedated, spontaneously breathing patients. After a low dose of 3 mg midazolam IV, remimazolam was administered continuously (0.46–0.92 mg/kg/h). This was supplemented with a low dose of remifentanil (0.04–0.05 µg/kg/min). The Trachospray device (MedSpray Anesthesia BV, Enschede, The Netherlands) was used for topicalization of the upper airway by means of 4 mL of lidocaine 5%. In addition, a further 5 mL of lidocaine 5% was sprayed via an epidural catheter advanced through the oxygenation port of the C-MAC video stylet for further topicalization of the vocal cords and proximal part of the trachea. The well-coordinated steps described in these two cases may represent a blueprint and a good starting point for future studies with a larger number of patients.

The perfusion index as a method of assessing epidural anaesthesia efficacy in healthy dogs

Abstract Introduction Perfusion index (PI) is used as assessment of epidural anaesthesia efficacy in human medicine, but its usefulness in dogs is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of PI in determining epidural anaesthesia effectiveness. Material and Methods This is prospective cross-over experimental study. Five healthy adult beagle dogs were anaesthetised and an epidural catheter was inserted in the lumbosacral area and adjusted so that the end of the catheter was placed at the fourth lumbar vertebra. Single-port catheters were used in the control group and multiple-port catheters were used in the treatment group. A PI probe was placed on a hind leg, and the catheter placement was confirmed via computed tomography. The treatment group received a bolus dose of lidocaine, and the control group received saline, via epidural catheter. The PI value was recorded every 5 min until 30 min after lidocaine injection. Results The PIs of the hind limbs were not significantly different over time, nor were they between the control and lidocaine-injected groups at any point in time. Conclusion The PI is not useful in determining the efficacy of epidural anaesthesia in dogs under general anaesthesia. In the future, finding a reliable method to evaluate the success of regional anaesthesia, even in patients under general anaesthesia, will be necessary.

Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.

Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention

Background: Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient’s comfort. Results: The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases – two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (p = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (p = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; p = 0.3) were similar between both study groups. Conclusion: Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.

Analysis of the Effects of Epidural Anesthesia on the Nociception Level Index (NOL®) during Abdominal Surgery.

Background: The NOL® system (PMD-200™ Nociception Level Monitor; Medasense Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel) is used for the real-time detection of physiological nociception in anesthetized patients by assessing the parameters indicative of sympathetic activity, such as photoplethysmography, skin conductance, peripheral temperature, and accelerometry, which are quantified into the NOL®-Index. This index is more sensitive than traditional clinical parameters in estimating pain and stress responses. While its effectiveness in general anesthesia is well documented, its efficacy in epidural anesthesia needs further investigation. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed NOL®-Index dynamics compared to conventional parameters after epidural administration of bupivacaine. Following ethics committee approval, 119 NOL® measurements were retrospectively analyzed after thoracic epidural catheter administration in 40 patients undergoing abdominal and urological surgery. The NOL-Index® was assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 5 min post application and compared to heart rate, blood pressure, and bispectral index dynamics. Results: This study showed a significant decrease in the NOL®-Index post-local-anesthetic administration with better sensitivity than classical clinical parameters (0 min = 38 ± 11; 1 min = 22 ± 13*; 3 min = 17 ± 11*; 5 min = 12 ± 10*). Higher doses of local anesthetics led to a significant, dose-dependent decrease in NOL®-Index (low dose, 5 min = 15 ± 10*; high dose, 5 min = 8 ± 8*). Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of the NOL®-Index in measuring nociceptive effects following epidural administration, highlighting its potential superiority over conventional parameters and its sensitivity to dose variations.

Criteria for continuous neuraxial analgesia associated with reduced mortality in patients undergoing thoracotomy

IntroductionBoth thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral analgesia are effective techniques to control pain and minimize the stress response following thoracic surgery. We hypothesized that continuous neuraxial techniques may be...

Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination on spinal block characteristics in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery - A randomised clinical trial.

One major limitation of the spinal block remains the inability to extend the duration of the block intraoperatively unless planned before with spinal or epidural catheters and/or intrathecal additives. This study was designed to compare the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination infusion on spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. This randomised study was conducted in 60 patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group D (n = 30) (0.5 µg/kg of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine bolus followed by maintenance infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) and Group LKD (n = 30) (IV bolus of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.2 mg/kg of ketamine, followed by maintenance infusions of dexmedetomidine and ketamine at 0.5 µg/kg/h and 0.2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was maintained. The t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters between groups. The mean sacral segment 1 (S1) regression time was 390.3 [standard deviation (SD):84.38] [95% confidence interval (CI): 360.13, 420.53] versus 393.23 (SD: 93.01) (95% CI: 363.04, 423.43) min in Group D versus Group LKD respectively ((P = 0.701). The number of episodes of hypotension was significantly higher in Group D (19 patients) compared to Group LKD (nine patients) (P = 0.001). Pre- and postoperative stress markers (24 h) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and shivering were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). Tramadol requirement in the postoperative period was significantly less in Group LKD compared to Group D (P = 0.003). The duration of S1 regression was similar between group dexmedetomidine (Group D) and group low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Group LKD).

Anesthesia management for cesarean section in a woman with chronic renal failure and heart failure: a case report

IntroductionPregnancy in a woman with heart and chronic renal failure can lead to life-threatening complications for both mother and child. Although such cases are often delivered by cesarean section, few reports have described anesthesia methods.Case presentationWe encountered a case in which cesarean section was performed using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for a pregnant woman with chronic renal and heart failure. The 35-year-old Japanese woman had been undergoing hemodialysis for several years. Heart failure symptoms that appeared during pregnancy initially improved with treatments such as increasing hemodialysis, but recurred. She was admitted to the intensive care unit. The initial plan was to deliver the baby after a few weeks, but further progression of heart failure became a concern. After a clinical conference among staff, a cesarean section with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was scheduled for 24 weeks, 0 days of gestation. The anticoagulant for dialysis was also changed from heparin to nafamostat in preparation for cesarean section. Monitoring was started with central venous and radial artery pressures before induction of anesthesia. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was induced and the cesarean section was completed without complications. Surgery was initiated under continuous administration of phenylephrine, which was intended to avoid hypotension due to anesthesia. The hemodynamic and respiratory status of the patient remained stable postoperatively. After the cesarean section, morphine was administered epidurally and the epidural catheter was removed.ConclusionCesarean section was safely performed for a pregnant woman with renal and heart failure using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia.