Eosinophilic Group Research Articles

Association of blood inflammatory phenotypes and asthma burden in children with moderate-to-severe asthma

BackgroundUnderlying immunological mechanisms in children with moderate-to-severe asthma are complex and unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between blood inflammatory parameters and asthma burden in children with moderate-to-severe asthma.MethodsBlood inflammatory parameters (eosinophil(E) and neutrophil(N) counts and inflammatory mediators using multiplex immunoassay technology) were measured in children (6–17 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma from SysPharmPediA cohort across four European countries. Based upon low(L)/high(H) blood(B) eosinophil (LBE/HBE: </≥0.3×109/L, respectively) and neutrophil counts (LBN/HBN: </≥4×109/L, respectively), mixed(HBE-HBN), eosinophilic(HBE-LBN), neutrophilic(LBE-HBN), and paucigranulocytic(LBE-LBN) phenotypes were defined. Inflammatory mediator profiles and burden of disease (asthma control status, exacerbations and school days missed in the past year) were compared between phenotypes using adjusted logistic regression models.ResultsAmong 126 included children (41% girls and mean(sd) age of 11.94(2.76)), 22%, 44%, 11%, and 23% were classified as mixed, eosinophilic, neutrophilic, and paucigranulocytic phenotypes respectively. Neutrophilic children had lowest lung function (FEV1%predicted pre-salbutamol) compared to other groups. Children with mixed asthma were most often uncontrolled and had highest asthma-related school absence in the past year. Interleukin-6(IL-6) and matrix metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9) levels were significantly higher in patients with mixed or neutrophilic asthma, while tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2(TIMP-2) was lower in patients with neutrophilic asthma compared to eosinophilic or paucigranulocytic asthma. Interleukin-5(IL-5) was increased in eosinophilic group compared to neutrophilic and paucigranulocytic groups, irrespective of the chosen cut-off for eosinophilia.ConclusionDifferences in asthma burden-related clinical expression and distinct blood inflammatory mediator profiles were found between phenotypes, highlighting implications for optimizing personalized treatment and management strategies in children with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Association Between Cytokeratin 19-Specific IgG and Neutrophil Activation in Asthma.

Patients with non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA) are less responsive to anti-inflammatory drugs and suffer from frequent asthma exacerbations. The pathogenic mechanism of NEA is not fully understood; however, the roles of monocytes and autoimmune mechanisms targeting airway epithelial cell (AEC) antigens have been proposed. The effects of monocyte extracellular traps (MoETs) on cytokeratin 19 (CK19) production in AECs, as well as the impact of CK19-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G on neutrophil and monocyte activation, were investigated both in vivo and in vitro. Sixty asthmatic patients and 15 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled, and the levels of serum immune complexes containing CK19-specific IgG and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-specific IgG were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassay. MoETs induced CK19 and CK19-specific IgG production. Furthermore, the levels of serum CK19-specific IgG were significantly higher in the NEA group than in the eosinophilic asthma group. Among patients with NEA, asthmatics with high levels of CK19-specific IgG had higher levels of myeloperoxidase and NET-specific IgG than those with low levels of CK19-specific IgG (P = 0.020 and P = 0.017; respectively). Moreover, the immune complexes from asthmatics with high CK19-specific IgG enhanced NET formation and reactive oxygen species production (neutrophil activation), which were suppressed by N-acetylcysteine and anti-CD16 antibody treatment. These findings suggest that circulating CK19 and CK19-specific IgG may contribute to NET formation, leading to airway inflammation and steroid resistance in NEA.

Association of blood eosinophils with corticosteroid treatment failure stratified by smoking status among inpatients with AECOPD

BackgroundRecent studies have suggested elevated blood eosinophils are independent predictors of response to corticosteroid therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Smoking status has been...

The Determinants of Eosinophilia in Patients With Severe Asthma.

Asthma is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) as a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation. The pathogenesis of the disease is better understood with the comprehension of immunological pathways. These pathways differ by the type of recruited cells and released interleukin (IL). Thus, asthma can be classified into subtypes based on the underlying immune mechanism: eosinophilic asthma (EA) and non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA). Patients with EA tend to respond better to inhaled corticosteroid as compared to those with NEA. The distinction of EA is very important in the light of emergent type 2 inflammation targeted therapies. We performed a 1-year (2018) retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Database (NIS). We included all adult patients presenting with severe asthma. Patients were stratified into two groups: eosinophilic severe asthma and non-eosinophilic severe asthma. The primary outcomes measures were the prevalence of chronic steroid use, status asthmaticus, family history of asthma, food, drug and environmental allergies, presence of nasal polyps, allergic rhinitis, allergic dermatitis, need for mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen supplementation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. We performed descriptive statistics. Continuous parametric variables were reported using a mean and standard deviation. Continuous nonparametric variables were reported using a median and interquartile range. To compare the characteristics of the two groups, we used the independent t-test for continuous parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous nonparametric variables. The Chi-square test was used to assess differences in categorical variables. A total of 2,646 patients were included, out of which 882 belonged to the eosinophilic group and 1,764 were in the non-eosinophilic group. Comparing EA versus NEA, we have found that eosinophilic group was characterized by higher percentage of steroid use (18.3% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). This group also had higher rates of status asthmaticus and positive family history (P = 0.009 and 0.004, respectively). The presence of allergies, allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, and allergic dermatitis was higher among patients with eosinophilia. The need for mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen was also higher among this group (P < 0.001 for both); however, there was no significant difference in mortality rate (P = 0.347) and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (P < 0.001). We showed herein that the eosinophilic subtype of asthma differs widely from the non-eosinophilic phenotype. Clinically, patients with eosinophilia might exhibit different symptomatology, more atopy, and concomitant comorbidities. However, this group might have better response to steroid therapy and might benefit from the new emergent T2 immune targeted therapy. The identification of EA is crucial for better disease control.

The auxiliary diagnostic value of ECP and MPO expression in nasal secretions in different types of rhinitis

Objective:To evaluate the expression of eosinophil cationic protein and myeloperoxidase in nasal secretions in different types of rhinitis, and to explore their values in the differential diagnosis of different types of rhinitis. Methods:Six hundred and eighty-four subjects were selected, including 62 subjects in the acute rhinitis group, 378 subjects in the allergic rhinitis group, 94 subjects in the vasomotor rhinitis group, 70 subjects in the eosinophilic non-allergic rhinitis group, and 80 subjects in the control group. Nasal secretion samples were collected from the five groups, and the percentages of inflammatory cells were counted by Rachel's staining, and the expression of ECP/MPO was detected by colloidal gold assay. The correlation between the clinical diagnosis, the inflammatory cells in the nasal secretions and the expression of ECP/MPO was analyzed. Results:Nasal cytological smears showed that compared with the control group, the percentage of eosinophils in the AR and NARES groups were significantly higher （P<0.05）, while the percentage of neutrophils was not different （P>0.05）; the percentage of neutrophils was significantly higher in the acute rhinitis group compared with the control group （P<0.05）, while the percentage of eosinophils was not statistically different （P>0.05）; in vasomotor rhinitis group, the eosinophils and neutrophils were not statistically different compared with the control group（P> 0.05）. The colloidal gold results showed that there were differences in the expression of ECP/MPO in different types of rhinitis, among which 49 cases （79.0%） in the acute rhinitis group expressed ECP+/MPO+; 267 cases （70.6%） in the AR group and 56 cases （75.7%） in the NARES group expressed ECP+/MPO-; 80 cases （85.1%） in the vasomotor rhinitis group and 69 cases （86.3%） in the control group expressed ECP-/MPO-. Conclusion:The differences in ECP and MPO expression between different types of rhinitis have certain reference value for the differential diagnosis of different types of rhinitis and the selection of treatment programs.

Blood eosinophil variability in patients presenting with acute exacerbations of COPD within the past year and its correlation with treatment plan

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an acknowledged contributor to universal fatality and morbidity. Using biomarkers to pinpoint its phenotypes is crucial, enabling individualized treatment and enhancing prognosis.ObjectiveStudying the steadiness of blood eosinophi1s in cases who experienced repeated hospital admissions for acute worsening of COPD during a year and its correlation to the treatment plan.MethodsA retrospective cohort study includes 270 COPD male patients with acute exacerbations. The patients were divided into three groups: fluctuating (ranges between ≥ 150 cells/ul and < 150 cells/ul), non-EOS (< 150 cells/ul), and Eosinophil (EOS) (≥ 150 cells/ul).ResultsMost patients were in the fluctuating blood EOS group (53.3%). The median length of hospital stay was longer in the fluctuating group (5 days). There was a significant positive correlation between the number of exacerbations and both EOS count and EOS/WBCs. A higher eosinophilic count was associated with an increased risk of eosinophilic exacerbations. Most patients used steroids (higher in the EOS group, 61.6%).ConclusionBlood eosinophilic count is promising for investigating acute COPD exacerbations. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is a relevant biomarker for directing the management of COPD exacerbations, including steroids.

Comparison of Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes of the Subtypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

(1) Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impacts the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients. This study aims to investigate the disparities in preoperative examination findings, postoperative HRQOL, and disease control status based on CRSwNP subtypes. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 202 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for CRSwNP. The study assessed clinical characteristics, blood eosinophil and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, modified Lund-Kennedy and Lund-Mackay scores, and Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) scores. HRQOL was evaluated using the Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, and disease control status was assessed based on the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 guidelines. (3) Results: Of the 202 patients, Eosinophilic CRSwNP patients exhibited significantly higher preoperative peripheral blood eosinophil ratios and IgE levels, and JESREC scores (p < 0.05). Two years postoperatively, patients in the non-eosinophilic group showed significantly improved SNOT-22 scores compared to preoperative scores (p = 0.007). Notably, the proportion of patients with uncontrolled disease was significantly higher in the eosinophilic group (p = 0.035). Logistic regression analyses identified preoperative SNOT-22 scores and eosinophilic CRSwNP subtype as influential factors on disease control status (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Patients with more severe preoperative symptoms and eosinophilic CRSwNP demonstrated poorer long-term treatment outcomes.

Clinical evaluation of pulmonary quantitative computed tomography parameters for diagnosing eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Characteristics and diagnostic performance.

To investigate the characteristics and diagnostic performance of quantitativecomputed tomography (QCT) parameters in eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. High-resolution CT scans of COPD patients were retrospectively analyzed, and various emphysematous parenchyma measurements, including lung volume (LC), lung mean density (LMD), lung standard deviation (LSD), full-width half maximum (FWHM), and lung relative voxel number (LRVN) were performed. The QCT parameters were compared between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic COPD patients, using a definition of eosinophilic COPD as blood eosinophil values ≥ 300 cells·µL-1 on at least three times. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and python were used to evaluate discriminative efficacy of QCT. Noneosinophilic COPD patients had a significantly lower TLMD (-846.3 ± 47.9 Hounsfield Unit[HU]) and TFWHM(162.5 ± 30.6 HU) compared to eosinophilic COPD patients (-817.8 ± 54.4, 177.3 ± 33.1 HU, respectively) (p = 0.018, 0.03, respectively). Moreover, the total LC (TLC) and TLSD were significantly lower in eosinophilic COPD group (3234.4 ± 1145.8, 183.8 ± 33.9 HU, respectively) than the noneosinophilic COPD group (5600.2 ± 1248.4, 203.5 ± 20.4 HU, respectively) (p = 0.009, 0.002, respectively). The ROC-AUC values for TLC, TLMD, TLSD, and TFWHM were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.828-0.936), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.546-0.761), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.524-0.742), and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.511-0.731), respectively. When the TLC value was 4110 mL, the sensitivity was 90.7% (95% CI, 79.7-96.9), specificity was 77.8% (95% CI, 57.7-91.4) and accuracy was 86.4%. Notably, TLC demonstrated the highest discriminative efficiency with an F1 Score of 0.79, diagnostic Odds Ratio of 34.3 and Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.69, surpassing TLMD (0.55, 3.66, 0.25), TLSD (0.56, 3.95, 0.26), and TFWHM (0.56, 4.16, 0.33). Eosinophilic COPD patients exhibit lower levels of emphysema and a more uniform density distribution throughout the lungs compared to noneosinophilic COPD patients. Furthermore, TLC demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency and may serve as a valuable diagnostic marker for distinguishing between the two groups.

Quantification of eosinophilic area and its potential molecular feature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Previous studies have acknowledged the presence of eosinophilic cytoplasm in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, yet the precise quantification method and potential molecular attributes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma remain elusive. This study endeavours to precisely quantify the eosinophilic attribute and probe into the molecular mechanisms governing its presence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Data from cohorts of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent nephrectomy, comprising The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (n=475) and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center cohort (n=480), were aggregated to assess the eosinophilic attribute. Additionally, Omics data from Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) (n=58) were leveraged to explore the potential molecular features associated with eosinophilic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Employing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the proportion of tumour cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm was determined, leading to the classification of each cohort into distinct groups: a clear group (<5%) and an eosinophilic group (≥5%). In both cohorts, the eosinophilic feature consistently correlated with higher International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, elevated tumor stage, and the presence of necrosis. Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier method demonstrated that patients in the eosinophilic group exhibited shorter overall survival or disease-free survival compared with those in the clear group, a pattern reaffirmed in various stratified survival analyses. Intriguingly, within The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort, the pathological characterization of cell cytoplasm (eosinophilic vs. clear) emerged as an independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.507 [95% confidence interval: 1.328-4.733], P = 0.005) or disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.730 [95% confidence interval: 1.062-2.818], P = 0.028) via Cox regression analysis. Moreover, multi-Omics data unveiled frequent BAP1 mutations and down-regulation of Erythroblast Transformation-Specific-Related Gene associated with the eosinophilic feature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Additionally, patients with low expression of Erythroblast Transformation-Specific-Related Gene showed worse overall survival (P < 0.001). The quantification of the eosinophilic feature serves as a robust predictor of clinical prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the manifestation of this feature may be linked to BAP1 mutations and the down-regulation of Erythroblast Transformation-Specific-Related Gene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Significantly, the expression levels of Erythroblast Transformation-Specific-Related Gene manifest as an exemplary prognostic marker, providing exceptional predictive accuracy for the clinical prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Endotyping Eosinophilic Inflammation in COPD with ELAVL1, ZfP36 and HNRNPD mRNA Genes

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease characterized by progressive airflow obstruction, influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Eosinophils have been implicated in COPD pathogenesis, prompting the categorization into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic endotypes. This study explores the association between eosinophilic inflammation and mRNA expression of ELAVL1, ZfP36, and HNRNPD genes, which encode HuR, TTP and AUF-1 proteins, respectively. Additionally, it investigates the expression of IL-9 and IL-33 in COPD patients with distinct eosinophilic profiles. Understanding these molecular associations could offer insights into COPD heterogeneity and provide potential therapeutic targets. Methods: We investigated 50 COPD patients, of whom 21 had eosinophilic inflammation and 29 had non-eosinophilic inflammation. Epidemiological data, comorbidities, and pulmonary function tests were recorded. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated for mRNA analysis of ELAVL1, ZfP36, and HNRNPD genes and serum cytokines (IL-9, IL-33) were measured using ELISA kits. Results: The study comprised 50 participants, with 66% being male and a mean age of 68 years (SD: 8.9 years). Analysis of ELAVL1 gene expression revealed a 0.45-fold increase in non-eosinophilic and a 3.93-fold increase in eosinophilic inflammation (p = 0.11). For the ZfP36 gene, expression was 6.19-fold higher in non-eosinophilic and 119.4-fold higher in eosinophilic groups (p = 0.07). Similarly, HNRNPD gene expression was 0.23-fold higher in non-eosinophilic and 0.72-fold higher in eosinophilic inflammation (p = 0.06). Furthermore, serum levels of IL-9 showed no statistically significant difference between the eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic group (58.03 pg/mL vs. 52.55 pg/mL, p = 0.98). Additionally, there was no significant difference in IL-33 serum levels between COPD patients with eosinophilic inflammation and those with non-eosinophilic inflammation (39.61 pg/mL vs. 37.94 pg/mL, p = 0.72). Conclusions: The data suggest a notable trend, lacking statistical significance, towards higher mRNA expression for the ZfP36 and HNRNPD genes for COPD patients with eosinophilic inflammation compared to those with non-eosinophilic inflammation.

Eosinophilic Patterns in Patients with Seasonal Allergy Affected by Bronchial Asthma and Rhinitis/Rhinosinusitis: Efficacy of Benralizumab in Patients with the Persistent Pattern

Background: Eosinophilia can be influenced by multiple factors. This study aims to set a protocol for monitoring blood absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in patients with seasonal allergy affected by bronchial asthma (BA), allergic rhinitis (AR), or chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis (CRSw/sNP). Methods: We planned a total of four annual blood samples to measure AEC in- and out-seasonal pollen exposure (i.e., one measurement every three months for one year). Results: We identified two distinct groups of patients (non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic). Patients in the eosinophilic group presented with four different patterns (episodic, transient, floating, and persistent). Most patients with episodic, transient, and floating patterns were affected by mild allergy and the increase in eosinophils was related to allergen exposure. In contrast, patients with the persistent pattern mostly presented with more severe allergy (i.e., severe BA and relapsing CRSwNP) and the eosinophilia was unrelated to allergen exposure. The subgroup of patients with severe BA, relapsing CRSwNP, and persistent eosinophilc pattern were treated with benralizumab, which induced a noteworthy improvement in both severe BA and CRSwNP. Conclusions: Multiple AEC measurements in patients with seasonal allergy can better reflect patient’s eosinophilic status and help define the relationship of AEC enhancement with allergen exposure.

Elevated Eosinophil Counts in Acute Exacerbations of Bronchiectasis: Unveiling a Distinct Clinical Phenotype.

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by bronchial dilation. However, the significance of elevated eosinophil counts in acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis remains unclear. This retrospective case-control study included 169 hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Based on blood eosinophil levels, patients were categorized into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic bronchiectasis groups. Various clinical variables, including lung function, comorbidities and clinical features were collected for analysis. The study aimed to examine the differences between these groups and their clinical phenotypes. Eosinophilic bronchiectasis (EB) was present in approximately 22% of all hospitalized patients with bronchiectasis, and it was more prevalent among male smokers (P < 0.01). EB exhibited greater severity of bronchiectasis, including worse airway obstruction, higher scores in the E-FACED (FACED combined with exacerbations) and bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), a high glucocorticoids medication possession ratio, and increased hospitalization cost (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). Furthermore, we observed a significant positive correlation between blood eosinophil count and both sputum eosinophils (r = 0.49, P < 0.01) and serum total immunoglobulin E levels (r = 0.21, P < 0.05). Additional analysis revealed that patients with EB had a higher frequency of shortness of breath (P < 0.05), were more likely to have comorbid sinusitis (P < 0.01), and exhibited a greater number of lung segments affected by bronchiectasis (P < 0.01). These findings suggest that EB presents a distinct pattern of bronchiectasis features, confirming the notion that it is a specific phenotype.

Different expression levels of interleukin-36 in asthma phenotypes

Interleukin (IL)-36 family is closely associated with inflammation and consists of IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ, and IL-36Ra. The role of IL-36 in the context of asthma and asthmatic phenotypes is not well characterized. We examined the sputum IL-36 levels in patients with different asthma phenotypes in order to unravel the mechanism of IL-36 in different asthma phenotypes. Our objective was to investigate the induced sputum IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ, and IL-36Ra concentrations in patients with mild asthma, and to analyze the relationship of these markers with lung function and other cytokines in patients with different asthma phenotypes. Induced sputum samples were collected from patients with mild controlled asthma (n = 62, 27 males, age 54.77 ± 15.49) and healthy non-asthmatic controls (n = 16, 10 males, age 54.25 ± 14.60). Inflammatory cell counts in sputum were determined. The concentrations of IL-36 and other cytokines in the sputum supernatant were measured by ELISA and Cytometric Bead Array. This is the first study to report the differential expression of different isoforms of IL-36 in different asthma phenotypes. IL-36α and IL-36β concentrations were significantly higher in the asthma group (P = 0.003 and 0.031), while IL-36Ra concentrations were significantly lower (P < 0.001) compared to healthy non-asthmatic controls. Sputum IL-36α and IL-36β concentrations in the neutrophilic asthma group were significantly higher than those in paucigranulocytic asthma (n = 24) and eosinophilic asthma groups (n = 23). IL-36α and IL-36β showed positive correlation with sputum neutrophils and total cell count (R = 0.689, P < 0.01; R = 0.304, P = 0.008; R = 0.689, P < 0.042; R = 0.253, P = 0.026). In conclusion, IL-36α and IL-36β may contribute to asthma airway inflammation by promoting neutrophil recruitment in airways. Our study provides insights into the inflammatory pathways of neutrophilic asthma and identifies potential therapeutic target.

A five-gene qPCR signature can classify type 2 asthma comparably to microscopy of induced sputum from severe asthma patients

ABSTRACT Asthma is a heterogenous disease characterized by airway inflammation and variable expiratory airflow limitation resulting in variable respiratory symptoms. Characterization of airway inflammation is important to choose the optimal treatment for severe asthma patients eligible for biological treatment. However, counting cells in induced sputum samples are a time-consuming process, highly dependent on personal skills. Replacing eosinophil and neutrophil cell counting with qPCR for transcripts of selected mast cell, and basophil genes may provide more reproducible results. Aims The objective of this study was to compare qPCR with microscopy in asthma endotyping. Methods A qPCR method measuring five mast cell/basophil genes was applied on induced sputum samples from 30 severe asthma patients and compared with microscopy. Target gene Ct-values (CPA3, GATA2, HDC, MS4A2, TPSAB1/TPSB2) were referenced to household β-actin Ct values as a measure of relative mRNA abundance of the target in each sample. Target/β-actin-ratios in eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups determined by microscopy with an eosinophil threshold of 3% in 400 cells were compared using Mann–Whitney U Test. Spearman´s correlations were used to test for correlation between targets vs. FENO and targets vs. blood eosinophil counts. Results The study demonstrated a statistical difference in relative mRNA abundance for four mast cell/basophil specific genes. CPA3, GATA2, HDC and MS4A2 were elevated in eosinophilic asthma versus non-eosinophilic asthma patients. The study found that GATA2, CPA3, MS4A2 and TPSAB1/TPSB2 transcripts are positively correlated with FENO. Neither the five mast cell genes nor the five-gene signature correlated with blood eosinophils. The five-gene signature with a target/β-actin-ratio cut-off ≥2 generated sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 94%, NPV = 88% and PPV = 92% compared to microscopy. Conclusion This study confirms the contribution of mast cells in the pathogenesis of EA and suggests that mast cell mRNA markers could be one of the biomarkers used to identify EA

Sputum microbiota and inflammatory subtypes in asthma, COPD, and its overlap

BackgroundAirway microbiota in asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) remains unknown. ObjectiveThis study with ACO-enriched population aimed to clarify airway microbiota in ACO and in mixed granulocytic inflammation, often detected in ACO and chronic airway diseases. MethodsThis is an observational cross-sectional study. Patients with asthma with airflow limitation, ACO and COPD were enrolled. Blood tests, pulmonary function, exhaled nitric oxide and sputum tests were conducted. Sputum microbiota was evaluated using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing technique. ResultsA total of 112 patients (13 asthma, 67 ACO, 32 COPD) were examined. There were no significant differences in α-diversity among the three diseases. The relative abundances of phylum Bacteroidetes, class Bacteroidia, and genus Porphyromonas were associated with decreased eosinophilic inflammation, and were significantly lower in ACO than in COPD. In a comparison of sputum inflammatory subtypes, the proportion of Haemophilus was numerically highest in the mixed granulocytic subtype, followed by the neutrophilic subtype. Likewise, the proportion of Haemophilus was the highest in the intermediate-high (2%–8%) sputum eosinophil group and lowest in the severe (8%≤) eosinophil group. Clinically, Haemophilus proportion was associated with sputum symptoms. Finally, the proportion of Streptococcus was associated with higher blood eosinophil counts and severest airflow limitation. ConclusionBacteroidia and Porphyromonas abundances in sputum are associated with the eosinophil-low phenotype, and ACO may be characterised by a decrease in these taxa. A mild elevation of sputum eosinophil does not preclude the presence of Haemophilus, which should be noted in the management of obstructive airway diseases.

The Correlation of Tissue’s Endotype Biomarkers and Dominant Inflammation Cell in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Background and Objectives This study analyzes the relationship between endotype biomarkers and the type of tissue inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in order to obtain a more accurate division of disease groups and appropriate therapy.Subjects and Method We carried out a cross-sectional study involving 33 samples of CRS patients. We conducted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to examine endotype biomarkers and histopathology methods to examine tissue inflammation.Results Statistical analysis with an independent t-test showed significant differences with respect to eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) between the eosinophilic and neutrophilic groups (p&lt;0.05), whereas there were no significant differences between the two groups (p&gt;0.05) with respect to Charcot-Leyden crystal (CLC), interleukin-5 (IL-5), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin- 17A (IL-17A), and oncostatin M (OSM). The Spearman test showed also showed that ECP, CLC, IL-5, IL-17A, IFN-γ and OSM had no significant correlation with the two groups (p&gt;0.05). The receiver operating characteristics analysis showed the optimal cut-off value of ECP of 342.22 pg/mL with sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% for determining the inflammation type (area under cover=0.78, p=0.009).Conclusion The higher level of ECP was more likely to be found in the eosinophilic tissue inflammation. Consequently, we propose using ECP as the main biomarker to identify the CRS type 2. Further research with a larger sample size is required for cut-off points of ECP in order to determine the endotype of CRS.

The Prognostic Value of Blood Eosinophil Level in AECOPD is Influenced by Corticosteroid Treatment During Hospitalization.

Blood eosinophil is a promising biomarker for phenotyping patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of eosinophil on short- and long-term outcomes stratified by corticosteroid treatment among AECOPD inpatients. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients hospitalized for AECOPD from July 2013 to June 2021 in Beijing, China. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. The blood eosinophil count was measured within 24h after admission. Eosinophilic AECOPD was defined as having an eosinophil percentage ≥ 2%. The study outcomes were length of stay (LOS), treatment failure, and AECOPD readmission risk within 3 years of discharge. Multivariable models were used to analyze the associations between blood eosinophil count and outcomes stratified by corticosteroid treatment during hospitalization. A total of 2406 AECOPD patients were included. The median LOS of AECOPD patients was 10 (interquartile range: 8-14) days. The eosinophil percentage was negatively associated with LOS (P-trend=0.014). Compared with the non-eosinophilic AECOPD group, the eosinophilic group had a 58% lower risk of treatment failure (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89) in patients treated with systemic corticosteroids, but no association was observed in those treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) only (OR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.60-1.52). The eosinophilic group had an increased risk of 90-day re-admission in patients treated with ICS only (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.00-2.29), but not in patients treated with systemic corticosteroids during hospitalization (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.39-1.15). No statistically significant results were found for 180-day, 1-year, or 3-year readmission risk. Elevated blood eosinophils in AECOPD were associated with shorter length of stay and improved response to treatment with systemic corticosteroids, but not inhaled corticosteroids. Our study suggested that a therapeutic approach of using systemic corticosteroid may benefit patients present with eosinophilic AECOPD.

Differences in the lipid metabolism profile and clinical characteristics between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in serum lipid metabolite profiles and their relationship with clinical characteristics between patients with eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic AECOPD. Methods: A total of 71 AECOPD patients were enrolled. Eosinophilic AECOPD was defined as blood EOS% ≥ 2% (n = 23), while non-eosinophilic AECOPD, as blood EOS< 2% (n = 48). Clinical data were collected, and serum lipid metabolism profiles were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The XCMS software package was used to pre-process the raw data, and then, lipid metabolite identification was achieved through a spectral match using LipidBlast library. Differences in lipid profiles and clinical features between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups were analyzed by generalized linear regression. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was applied to screen the most characteristic lipid markers for the eosinophilic phenotype. Results: Eosinophilic AECOPD patients had less hypercapnic respiratory failures, less ICU admissions, a shorter length of stay in the hospital, and a lower fibrinogen level. In the lipid metabolism profiles, 32 significantly different lipid metabolites were screened through a t-test adjusted by using FDR (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05 and VIP> 1). Nine differential lipid metabolites were found to be associated with the three clinical features, namely, hypercapnia respiratory failure, ICU admission, and fibrinogen in further integration analysis. The species of triacylglycerol (TAG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), and diacylglyceryl trimethylhomoserine (DGTS) were high in these eosinophilic AECOPD. The LASSO was applied, and three lipid metabolites were retained, namely, LPC (16:0), TAG (17:0/17:2/17:2), and LPC (20:2). The logistic regression model was fitted using these three markers, and the area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.834 (95% CI: 0.740-0.929). Conclusion: Patients with eosinophilic AECOPD had a unique lipid metabolism status. Species of TAGs and LPCs were significantly increased in this phenotype and were associated with better clinical outcomes.

Association of Upon-Diagnosis Blood Eosinophilic Count with Frequency and Severity of Annual Exacerbation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Longitudinal Analysis.

There is a controversy regarding the relationship between blood eosinophil count and COPD exacerbation. We aimed to determine whether peripheral eosinophils upon COPD diagnosis could affect the frequency and severity of annual acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). This prospective study was conducted on 973 newly diagnosed COPD patients who were under 1-year follow-up in a pulmonology center in Iran. The Cox proportional model, polynomial regression, and receiver operator characteristic curves were conducted to evaluate the impact of the eosinophil levels on AECOPD. A linear regression model was conducted to evaluate the continuous association of eosinophilic count with AECOPDs. Patients with eosinophil >200 cells/microliter were higher pack-year smokers with more pulmonary hypertension prevalence compared to COPD patients with <200 cells/microliter. There was a positive correlation between the eosinophilic count and the frequency of AECOPDs. Eosinophil >900 cells/microliter and eosinophil >600 cells/microliter had a sensitivity of 71.1% and 64.3%, respectively, in predicting the occurrence of more than one AECOPD. Eosinophilic count cutoff of 800 cells/microliter had the highest Youden index with sensitivity and specificity of 80.2% and 76.6%, respectively, for incident AECOPD in newly diagnosed patients. Using a linear model, increasing 180 cells/microliter in serum eosinophils was associated with further exacerbation. Evaluating gender, BMI, smoking pack-year, FEV1/FVC, CAT score, GOLD score, pulmonary hypertension, annual influenza, pneumococcal vaccinations, leukocytosis, and blood eosinophils, only blood eosinophils (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44; 95% confidence interval = 1.33-2.15; p value = 0.03) and GOLD score (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.30-1.52; p value = 0.03) were found as independent risk factors of AECOPD >3 episodes/year. Requirement for ICU admission, invasive ventilation, and mortality rate due to AECOPDs was similar between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic groups. Eosinophilia upon COPD diagnosis is a factor of recurrent AECOPDs. To reduce the risk of AECOPDs and the burden of disease, clinicians may consider inhaler corticosteroids and domiciliary oxygen with a lower threshold for eosinophilic-COPD patients regardless of their clinical status.

The U-Shaped Relationship Between Eosinophil Count and Bronchiectasis Severity: The Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroids

Although a proven relationship exists between the blood eosinophil count (BEC) and the severity of both asthma and COPD, its relationship with bronchiectasis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between BEC and the number and severity of exacerbations, and patients' responses to inhaled corticosteroid (IC) treatment in bronchiectasis RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an association exist among BEC, the number of exacerbations and severity of bronchiectasis, and IC treatment? This was a multicenter (43 centers) prospective observational study derived from the Spanish Bronchiectasis Registry. Patients with proven bronchiectasis and a known BEC were included, whereas those with asthma or antieosinophilic treatments were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups according to the BEC at the time of inclusion in the study in a steady-state situation: (1) eosinopenic bronchiectasis (< 50 eosinophils/μL), (2) low number of eosinophils (51-100/μL), (3) normal number of eosinophils (101-300/μL), and (4) eosinophilic bronchiectasis (> 300 eosinophils/μL). Nine hundred twenty-eight patients finally were included: 123 patients (13.3%) with< 50 eosinophils/μL (eosinopenic group), 164 patients (17.7%) with 50-100 eosinophils/μL, 488 patients (52.6%) with 101-300 eosinophils/μL, and 153 patients (16.5%) with > 300 eosinophils/μL (eosinophilic group). BEC showed a significant U-shaped relationship with severity, exacerbations, lung function, microbiologic profile, and IC treatment (these being higher in the eosinopenic group compared with the eosinophilic group). IC treatment significantly decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the group of bronchiectasis patients with > 300 eosinophils/μL. A significant U-shaped relationship was found between BEC and severity and exacerbations in bronchiectasis that was more pronounced in the eosinopenic group. IC treatment decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the eosinophilic group.