Enzyme Immunoassay Positivity Research Articles

Clinical implications of discordance between anti-dsDNA antibodies by multiplex flow immunoassay and Crithidia luciliae assay in a multiethnic racial cohort of patients with SLE

ObjectiveAnti-dsDNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) are a component of all classification schemes in SLE and comprise one of the domains in validated activity indices. Anti-dsDNA is frequently measured commercially by an enzyme...

Clostridioides difficile PCR Tcdb Cycle Threshold predicts toxin EIA positivity but not severity of infection

BackgroundDiagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) entails compatible clinical presentation and laboratory findings. We evaluated real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) cycle threshold (CT) as a predictor for disease severity and TcdB enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results. MethodsInpatients or emergency department patients who tested positive for tcdB gene by PCR were evaluated. Patients’ stools underwent testing for GDH and TcdA/B by EIA. Medical health records were reviewed for demographic, clinical presentation, laboratory, treatment and outcome data. Severity of CDI was calculated using various severity score indexes. ResultsThe median CT of cases was 32.05 ± 5.45. The optimal cut-off for predicting toxin EIA positivity and severe CDI based on chart review was 32.6 and 29.8, respectively, with the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.60 respectively. ConclusionCT value was an acceptable predictor for EIA toxin but less so for clinical severity. Our study potentially supports a diagnostic algorithm including CT value to reduce the number of EIA toxin assays performed.

Rethinking the Gold Standard: Real-World Performance of the Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) and PF4-Dependent P-Selectin Expression Assay (PEA) in the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin exposure with potential for significant morbidity and mortality. The serotonin release assay (SRA) has been considered the gold standard for HIT diagnosis. However, the SRA is technically challenging and results can be influenced by specimen handling and preparation. Therefore, the performance of the real-world assays may differ from published standards but reports of real-world performance are not widely available. A new assay, the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA), has demonstrated comparable accuracy in HIT diagnosis employing a simpler laboratory technique. Herein, we report the real-world performance of a reference laboratory SRA and PEA and describe how incorporation of the PEA into the testing algorithm positively influenced the HIT diagnostic process at a large academic medical center. Methods At the University of Alabama at Birmingham, we incorporated the PEA into HIT testing at provider discretion in patients with inconclusive SRA results starting January 1, 2020. Since July 15, 2020, we solidified the use of PEA in our algorithm (Figure 1) in which all patients with an inconclusive SRA had a PEA on the same specimen. A PEA could also be ordered ad hoc if the SRA result did not correlate with clinical suspicion for HIT. We retrospectively compared patients tested for HIT for 2 years before PEA use (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019; pre-PEA period) to the >2 years since using the PEA (January 1, 2020 to March 1, 2022; PEA period). All patients tested with PEA at our institution are included in Table 1. Laboratory testing: Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was performed at our institution using Asserachrom® HPIA, Diagnostica Stago (France). The SRA and PEA assays were performed at Versiti (Milwaukee, WI). SRA was positive if there was >20% release of serotonin with low dose heparin (0.1 U/mL) and <20% release in with high dose heparin (100 U/mL). An inconclusive result was defined as a percentage of serotonin release not meeting criteria for a positive result (e.g., >20% release of serotonin with both low and high dose heparin, or some release but <20% with low dose along with inhibition with high dose). Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were employed to examine the sample of patients with an inconclusive SRA result, comparing those with and without PEA testing. Bivariate analyses were conducted to compare testing patterns in the pre-PEA and PEA periods, and T-tests of significance were conducted to analyze assay results. All models were estimated using Stata 17 (StataCorp. 2019. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC). ResultsSRA results: In the pre-PEA and PEA periods, there were 1,252 and 1,403 EIAs performed, respectively. The rate of EIA positivity was similar in both groups (14% vs 15%, p=0.813). A total of 379 SRAs were sent in both periods, with 24 inconclusive results (6%, 15 pre-PEA and 9 PEA). PEA performance: In the 24 patients with inconclusive SRA results, HIT was diagnosed in 7 of 15 patients (47%) pre-PEA, compared to 3 of 9 patients (33%) in the PEA period. Table 1 presents the details of each case where PEA was used due to diagnostic uncertainty. Of the 9 patients with an inconclusive SRA result in the PEA period, PEA provided a definitive result in 8 cases (89%). In 2 cases, the PEA confirmed the SRA result, 1 positive and 1 negative. In 1 case with a positive SRA and low clinical suspicion, the PEA was negative. Conclusion Evaluation of the real-world performance of the SRA reveals that although inconclusive results are rare (6%), they can present a significant diagnostic challenge in centers with high testing volume. The PEA demonstrated reliable performance in patients with an inconclusive SRA, producing a definitive result in 89% of cases. The percentage of patients diagnosed with HIT after an inconclusive SRA result decreased with incorporation of the PEA (47% to 33%), suggesting that PEA use helped refute a HIT diagnosis when there was clinical uncertainty. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal testing algorithm to produce rapid, reliable HIT diagnosis. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Two-step Testing for Clostridioides Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection From Colonization in Children.

Recent Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend multistep testing algorithms to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), including a combination of nucleic acid amplification-based testing (NAAT) and toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The use of these algorithms in children, including the ability to differentiate between C. difficile colonization and CDI, however, has not been evaluated. We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic pediatric patients with cancer, cystic fibrosis (CF), or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and obtained a stool sample for NAAT testing. If positive by NAAT (colonized), EIA was performed. In addition, children with symptomatic CDI who tested positive by NAAT via the clinical laboratory were enrolled, and EIA was performed on residual stool. A functional cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) was also applied to stool samples from both the colonized and symptomatic cohorts. Of the 225 asymptomatic children enrolled in the study, 47 (21%) were colonized with C. difficile including 9/59 (15.5%) with cancer, 30/92 (32.6%) with CF, and 8/74 (10.8%) with IBD. An additional 41 children with symptomatic CDI were enrolled. When symptomatic and colonized children were compared, neither EIA positivity (44% vs 26%, P = 0.07) nor CCNA positivity (49% vs 45%, P = 0.70) differed significantly or were able to predict disease severity in the symptomatic cohort. Use of a multistep testing algorithm with NAAT followed by EIA failed to differentiate symptomatic CDI from asymptomatic colonization in our pediatric cohort. As multistep algorithms are moved into clinical care, the pediatric provider will need to be aware of their limitations.

Can a toxin gene NAAT be used to predict toxin EIA and the severity of Clostridium difficile infection?

BackgroundDiagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI) is controversial because of the many laboratory methods available and their lack of ability to distinguish between carriage, mild or severe disease. Here we describe whether a low C. difficile toxin B nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cycle threshold (CT) can predict toxin EIA, CDI severity and mortality.MethodsA three-stage algorithm was employed for CDI testing, comprising a screening test for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), followed by a NAAT, then a toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA). All diarrhoeal samples positive for GDH and NAAT between 2012 and 2016 were analysed. The performance of the NAAT CT value as a classifier of toxin EIA outcome was analysed using a ROC curve; patient mortality was compared to CTs and toxin EIA via linear regression models.ResultsA CT value ≤26 was associated with ≥72% toxin EIA positivity; applying a logistic regression model we demonstrated an association between low CT values and toxin EIA positivity. A CT value of ≤26 was significantly associated (p = 0.0262) with increased one month mortality, severe cases of CDI or failure of first line treatment. The ROC curve probabilities demonstrated a CT cut off value of 26.6.DiscussionsHere we demonstrate that a CT ≤26 indicates more severe CDI and is associated with higher mortality. Samples with a low CT value are often toxin EIA positive, questioning the need for this additional EIA test.ConclusionsA CT ≤26 could be used to assess the potential for severity of CDI and guide patient treatment.

Population-level effectiveness of PMTCT Option A on early mother-to-child (MTCT) transmission of HIV in South Africa: implications for eliminating MTCT.

Eliminating mother-to-child transmission of HIV (EMTCT), defined as ≤50 infant HIV infections per 100 000 live births, is a global priority. Since 2011 policies to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) shifted from maternal antiretroviral (ARV) treatment or prophylaxis contingent on CD4 cell count to lifelong maternal ARV treatment (cART). We sought to measure progress with early (4-8 weeks postpartum) MTCT prevention and elimination, 2011-2013, at national and sub-national levels in South Africa, a high antenatal HIV prevalence setting ( ≈ 29%), where early MTCT was 3.5% in 2010. Two surveys were conducted (August 2011-March 2012 and October 2012-May 2013), in 580 health facilities, randomly selected after two-stage probability proportional to size sampling of facilities (the primary sampling unit), to provide valid national and sub-national-(provincial)-level estimates. Data collectors interviewed caregivers of eligible infants, reviewed patient-held charts, and collected infant dried blood spots (iDBS). Confirmed positive HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and positive total HIV nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated infant HIV exposure or infection, respectively. Weighted survey analysis was conducted for each survey and for the pooled data. National data from 10 106 and 9120 participants were analyzed (2011-12 and 2012-13 surveys respectively). Infant HIV exposure was 32.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 30.7-33.6%), in 2011-12 and 33.1% (95% CI 31.8-34.4%), provincial range of 22.1-43.6% in 2012-13. MTCT was 2.7% (95% CI 2.1%-3.2%) in 2011-12 and 2.6% (95% CI 2.0-3.2%), provincial range of 1.9-5.4% in 2012-13. HIV-infected ARV-exposed mothers had significantly lower unadjusted early MTCT (2.0% [2011-12: 1.6-2.5%; 2012-13:1.5-2.6%]) compared to HIV-infected ARV-naive mothers [10.2% in 2011-12 (6.5-13.8%); 9.2% in 2012-13 (5.6-12.7%)]. Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly lower early MTCT among exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) mothers receiving >10 weeks ARV prophylaxis or cART compared with EBF and no ARVs: (2.2% [95% CI 1.25-3.09%] vs 12.2% [95% CI 4.7-19.6%], respectively); among HIV-infected ARV-exposed mothers, 24.9% (95% CI 23.5-26.3%) initiated cART during or before the first trimester, and their early MTCT was 1.2% (95% CI 0.6-1.7%). Extrapolating these data, assuming 32% EIA positivity and 2.6% or 1.2% MTCT, 832 and 384 infants per 100 000 live births were HIV infected, respectively. Although we demonstrate sustained national-level PMTCT impact in a high HIV prevalence setting, results are far-removed from EMTCT targets. Reducing maternal HIV prevalence and treating all maternal HIV infection early are critical for further progress.

Population–level effectiveness of PMTCT Option A on early mother–to–child (MTCT) transmission of HIV in South Africa: implications for eliminating MTCT

BackgroundEliminating mother–to–child transmission of HIV (EMTCT), defined as ≤50 infant HIV infections per 100 000 live births, is a global priority. Since 2011 policies to prevent mother–to–child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) shifted from maternal antiretroviral (ARV) treatment or prophylaxis contingent on CD4 cell count to lifelong maternal ARV treatment (cART). We sought to measure progress with early (4–8 weeks postpartum) MTCT prevention and elimination, 2011–2013, at national and sub–national levels in South Africa, a high antenatal HIV prevalence setting ( ≈ 29%), where early MTCT was 3.5% in 2010.MethodsTwo surveys were conducted (August 2011–March 2012 and October 2012–May 2013), in 580 health facilities, randomly selected after two–stage probability proportional to size sampling of facilities (the primary sampling unit), to provide valid national and sub–national–(provincial)–level estimates. Data collectors interviewed caregivers of eligible infants, reviewed patient–held charts, and collected infant dried blood spots (iDBS). Confirmed positive HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and positive total HIV nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated infant HIV exposure or infection, respectively. Weighted survey analysis was conducted for each survey and for the pooled data.FindingsNational data from 10 106 and 9120 participants were analyzed (2011–12 and 2012–13 surveys respectively). Infant HIV exposure was 32.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 30.7–33.6%), in 2011–12 and 33.1% (95% CI 31.8–34.4%), provincial range of 22.1–43.6% in 2012–13. MTCT was 2.7% (95% CI 2.1%–3.2%) in 2011–12 and 2.6% (95% CI 2.0–3.2%), provincial range of 1.9–5.4% in 2012–13. HIV–infected ARV–exposed mothers had significantly lower unadjusted early MTCT (2.0% [2011–12: 1.6–2.5%; 2012–13:1.5–2.6%]) compared to HIV–infected ARV–naive mothers [10.2% in 2011–12 (6.5–13.8%); 9.2% in 2012–13 (5.6–12.7%)]. Pooled analyses demonstrated significantly lower early MTCT among exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) mothers receiving >10 weeks ARV prophylaxis or cART compared with EBF and no ARVs: (2.2% [95% CI 1.25–3.09%] vs 12.2% [95% CI 4.7–19.6%], respectively); among HIV–infected ARV–exposed mothers, 24.9% (95% CI 23.5–26.3%) initiated cART during or before the first trimester, and their early MTCT was 1.2% (95% CI 0.6–1.7%). Extrapolating these data, assuming 32% EIA positivity and 2.6% or 1.2% MTCT, 832 and 384 infants per 100 000 live births were HIV infected, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough we demonstrate sustained national–level PMTCT impact in a high HIV prevalence setting, results are far–removed from EMTCT targets. Reducing maternal HIV prevalence and treating all maternal HIV infection early are critical for further progress.

Update of Rotavirus Strains Circulating in Africa From 2007 Through 2011

The African Rotavirus Surveillance Network has been detecting and documenting rotavirus genotypes in the subcontinent since 1998, largely based on intercountry workshops conducted at Rotavirus Regional Reference Laboratories. This article reports on rotavirus genotypes generated at Regional Reference Laboratories, South Africa between 2007 and 2011 from 16 African countries. Stool samples were collected from <5-year-old children with diarrhea following World Health Organization criteria of hospital-based rotavirus surveillance. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was performed by National Laboratories. Regional Reference Laboratories retested 10% of randomly selected EIA positives and 10% of EIA negatives from each country as part of quality control. At least 50 rotavirus EIA positives from each country per year were subjected to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction based on G-/P-types. Sequencing was conducted in 5-10% of each representative G or P genotype to confirm the genotype, as well as to type some of the samples that could not be genotyped with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based methods. A total of 2555 of rotavirus EIA positives were genotyped. G1 was the most predominant (28.8%), followed by G9 (17.3%), G2 (16.8%), G8 (8.2%), G12 (6.2%) and G3 (5.9%). Similarly, the P[8] strain was the most prevalent (40.6%), followed by P[6] (30.9%) and P[4] (13.9%). The top G/P combinations detected were G1P[8] (18.4%), G9P[8] (11.7%), G2P[4] (8.6%), G2P[6] (6.2%), G1P[6] (4.9%), G3P[6] (4.3%), G8P[6] (3.8%) and G12P[8] (3.1%). There is high genetic diversity of rotavirus strains circulating in the subcontinent. Understanding the strain diversity pre- and postvaccine introduction are important in Africa to understand the broader impact of the rotavirus vaccines on regionally circulating strains.

Clinical characteristics and mortality in hepatitis C-positive haemodialysis patients: a population based study

The association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and clinical and laboratory measures in maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) patients are poorly understood. We analyzed data from over 37,000 MHD patients who underwent MHD for at least 3 months in DaVita dialysis clinics across USA in July 2001. The presence of HCV infection was determined using enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which was performed in 2778 MHD patients and was positive in 363 (13%) individuals. In a multivariate logistic regression model that adjusts for case-mix and available surrogates of malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS), the following were independent predictors of HCV infection: younger age, male gender, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, higher haemoglobin, lower serum albumin, higher total iron binding capacity, higher creatinine, and higher serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT). Among receiver operating characteristics of commonly measured laboratory values in this population, the SGOT had the highest area. An SGOT > or =25 u/l had an adjusted odds ratio of 4.96 (95% confidence interval: 3.75-6.57) for HCV antibody positivity (sensitivity 50%, specificity 87%). HCV EIA positivity among MHD patients younger than 65 years was associated with 40-80% higher hazard ratio of all-cause and cardiovascular death during the 2 year follow-up (July 2001 to June 2003) after adjustment for case-mix and measures of MICS. HCV infection, as diagnosed by EIA, has distinct racial, age and laboratory predilections in MHD patients. HCV positivity among MHD patients younger than 65 years is associated with significantly higher cardiovascular mortality. More diligent HCV detection and treatment may improve cardiovascular survival in MHD patients.

Multi‐residue enzyme immunoassays for screening for β‐agonists in faeces and feeds

Multi‐analyte screening methods for β‐agonists in faeces and feeds based on enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were developed. Commercially available EIA kits were used, and the results presented. The extraction for both matrices was performed under acid conditions. The addition of an organic solvent to the extradant, resulting in higher recoveries, was only retained for feeds as the background absorption for faeces increased substantially. Clean‐up for faecal extracts was achieved in a one‐step extraction with isobutyl alcohol. Detection limits in faeces were slightly different for the two types of kits used. They ranged from 0.8ng g−1 for clenbuterol to 10ng g−1 for terbutaline. In feeds, corresponding detection limits for both compounds were 5 ng g−1 and 110 ng g−1. Confirmation of EIA positives was established by liquid chromatography with post‐column diazotation and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry. In the screening of faeces over 1 year about 70% of the EIA positive samples were confirmed as positive.

Comparison of the PREMIER cryptococcal antigen enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination assay for detection of cryptococcal antigens

A new enzyme immunoassay (EIA), PREMIER Cryptococcal Antigen, was compared with latex agglutination (LA) for the detection and quantitation of circulating capsular polysaccharide antigen from Cryptococcus neoformans. The clinical evaluation of PREMIER EIA as a screening assay, including 475 specimens with 120 LA and EIA positives, resulted in 99% sensitivity and 97% specificity. The clinical specimens included sera and cerebrospinal fluids as well as 10 rheumatoid factor-positive and 20 anti-nuclear antibody-positive serum samples. This monoclonal antibody-based assay detects serotypes A to D at 0.63, 0.63, 7.8, and 62 ng/ml, respectively. With three different known positive specimens, the assay was found to yield coefficients of variation of 2 to 12% for intra- and interassay comparisons of precision and reproducibility. The primary use for semiquantitative values derived with the LA or EIA is to follow the course of disease and monitor drug therapies. The present data suggest that the PREMIER EIA will be a valuable method for this purpose. We conclude that the PREMIER Cryptococcal Antigen EIA provides a rapid, convenient, and reliable antigen detection method for screening and semiquantitative determination of antigen levels.

Early Detection of Antibodies Against rDNA-Produced HIV Proteins With a Flow Cytometric Assay

Abstract There is evidence that some human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals have prolonged periods of seronegativity. A flow cytometric immunoreactive bead (IRB) assay is described for quantitative, simultaneous, and early detection of antibodies to HIV. Polystyrene beads of four diameters, each size coated with a different HIV recombinant DNA-produced protein (p24, p31, gp41, or gp120), bound anti- HIV antibodies detected with fluorescent antiglobulin. The IRB assay was performed on a panel of blood donor samples, many giving consistently false-positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and indeterminant Western blot (WB) results. The IRB assay proved as sensitive and more specific than currently licensed EIA and WB tests. Results on serial samples from eight HIV-infected individuals indicated that quantitation of anti-p24 by IRB assay may be useful in monitoring disease progression. Sequential pre- and post-EIA seroconversion sera from 35 HIV-infected homosexual men were tested by the IRB assay using IgM- and IgG-specific fluorescent probes. All 35 cases were IRB assay positive for at least one rDNA-p either before (17 of 35, 49%) or at the time of EIA positivity. Eleven cases (31%) initially had only IgM anti-HIV, primarily to gp41 (17%). In two individuals, the IgM response was detected at least 18 months before EIA seroconversion. The IRB assay is a widely applicable analytic procedure, potentially useful in pretransfusion anti-HIV screening of blood.

Early detection of antibodies against rDNA-produced HIV proteins with a flow cytometric assay

There is evidence that some human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals have prolonged periods of seronegativity. A flow cytometric immunoreactive bead (IRB) assay is described for quantitative, simultaneous, and early detection of antibodies to HIV. Polystyrene beads of four diameters, each size coated with a different HIV recombinant DNA-produced protein (p24, p31, gp41, or gp120), bound anti-HIV antibodies detected with fluorescent antiglobulin. The IRB assay was performed on a panel of blood donor samples, many giving consistently false-positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and indeterminant Western blot (WB) results. The IRB assay proved as sensitive and more specific than currently licensed EIA and WB tests. Results on serial samples from eight HIV-infected individuals indicated that quantitation of anti-p24 by IRB assay may be useful in monitoring disease progression. Sequential pre- and post-EIA seroconversion sera from 35 HIV-infected homosexual men were tested by the IRB assay using IgM- and IgG-specific fluorescent probes. All 35 cases were IRB assay positive for at least one rDNA-p either before (17 of 35, 49%) or at the time of EIA positivity. Eleven cases (31%) initially had only IgM anti-HIV, primarily to gp41 (17%). In two individuals, the IgM response was detected at least 18 months before EIA seroconversion. The IRB assay is a widely applicable analytic procedure, potentially useful in pretransfusion anti-HIV screening of blood.

Effect of 10 minutes heat treatment on HIV antibody testing from alternate testing sites.

One hundred and thirty-five sera were tested for the presence of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the Abbott Diagnostics HTLV-III test before and after heating at 56 degrees C for 10 min. Only one serum specimen was repeatedly reactive after heating when compared with the unheated portion (1/135). The specimen was a low level positive (ratio of test over cutoff = 1.6). Fifty-eight different sera, selected to yield a high percentage of positive results, had both their heated and unheated Western blot (WB) results agree completely with repeated EIA testing. An additional 4,244 sera heated at 56 degrees C for 10 min were tested. Of the 330 repeatable EIA positives, only 38 were not confirmed by WB. HIV infectivity in sera was reduced from 10(3.5) TCID50 to 10(1) TCID50 by the same heat treatment. We conclude that heating sera at 56 degrees C for 10 min significantly reduces HIV infectivity and does not significantly affect the results of HIV antibody testing.

Follow-up Testing of Blood Donors Found to Be Enzyme Immunoassay Positive/Western Blot Negative for HTLV-III Antibody

<h3>To the Editor.—</h3> The human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III antibody enzyme immunoassay (EIA) has now been used for approximately eight months in blood centers. Early experience with the test nationwide shows 0.25% of the normal blood donor population to be positive.¹Of EIA positives, 23% are subsequently found to be Western blot (WB) positive.² The EIA is a spectrophotometric assay that is interpreted based on optical density values compared with a positive cutoff. Studies have correlated optical density values of EIA-positive blood samples with WB positivity and with positive viral cultures; most lowoptical density EIA-positive blood samples (close to the cutoff) are false-positives, ie, WB negative and viral culture negative.³Enzyme immunoassay-positive/WB-negative donors are equally likely to be female as male, whereas most EIA-positive/WB-positive donors are males and many are members of high-risk groups for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).² Blood centers are currently discarding EIA-positive/WB-negative