Enumerable Set Of Natural Numbers Research Articles

Relative order and spectrum in free and related groups

We consider a natural generalization of the concept of order of an element in a group [Formula: see text]: an element [Formula: see text] is said to have order [Formula: see text] in a subgroup [Formula: see text] (respectively, in a coset [Formula: see text]) of [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] is the first strictly positive integer such that [Formula: see text] (respectively, [Formula: see text]). We study this notion and its algorithmic properties in the realm of free groups and some related families. Both positive and negative (algorithmic) results emerge in this setting. On the positive side, among other results, we prove that the order of elements, the set of orders (called spectrum), and the set of preorders (i.e. the set of elements of a given order) with respect to finitely generated subgroups are always computable in free and free times free-abelian groups. On the negative side, we provide examples of groups and subgroups having essentially any subset of natural numbers as relative spectrum; in particular, non-recursive and even not computably enumerable sets of natural numbers. Also, we take advantage of Mikhailova’s construction to see that the spectrum membership problem is unsolvable for direct products of nonabelian free groups.

Small Universal Tissue P Systems with Symport/Antiport Rules

In this note, we consider the problem of looking for small universal one-symbol tissue P systems with symport/antiport rules. It is proved that six cells suffice to generate any recursively enumerable set of natural numbers by such a onesymbol tissue P system with symport/antiport rules, under the restriction that only one channel is allowed between two cells or between a cell and the environment. As for the case of allowing two channels between a cell and the environment, it is shown that the computational completeness can be obtained by one-symbol tissue P systems with symport/antiport rules having at most five cells. These results partially answer an open problem formulated by Artiom Alhazov, Rudolf Freund and Marion Oswald.

Towards finite-fold Diophantine representations

The celebrated theorem established by Martin Davis, Hilary Putnam, and Julia Robinson in 1961 states that every effectively enumerable set of natural numbers has an exponential Diophantine representation. This theorem was improved by the author in two ways: However, it remains unknown whether these two improvements could be combined, that is, whether every effectively enumerable set has a single-fold (or at least finite-fold) Diophantine representation. In the paper, we discuss known results about single-fold exponential Diophantine representations, their applications, possible approaches to improving them to the case of genuine Diophantine representations, and what would follow if such improvement is impossible. Bibliography: 27 titles.

Extending and interpreting Post’s programme

Computability theory concerns information with a causal–typically algorithmic–structure. As such, it provides a schematic analysis of many naturally occurring situations. Emil Post was the first to focus on the close relationship between information, coded as real numbers, and its algorithmic infrastructure. Having characterised the close connection between the quantifier type of a real and the Turing jump operation, he looked for more subtle ways in which information entails a particular causal context. Specifically, he wanted to find simple relations on reals which produced richness of local computability-theoretic structure. To this extent, he was not just interested in causal structure as an abstraction, but in the way in which this structure emerges in natural contexts. Post’s programme was the genesis of a more far reaching research project. In this article we will firstly review the history of Post’s programme, and look at two interesting developments of Post’s approach. The first of these developments concerns the extension of the core programme, initially restricted to the Turing structure of the computably enumerable sets of natural numbers, to the Ershov hierarchy of sets. The second looks at how new types of information coming from the recent growth of research into randomness, and the revealing of unexpected new computability-theoretic infrastructure. We will conclude by viewing Post’s programme from a more general perspective. We will look at how algorithmic structure does not just emerge mathematically from information, but how that emergent structure can model the emergence of very basic aspects of the real world.

Generalized communicating P systems

This paper considers a generalization of various communication models based on the P system paradigm where two objects synchronously move across components. More precisely, the model uses blocks of four cells such that pairs of objects from two input cells travel together to target output cells. It is shown that the model introduced, based on interactions between blocks, is complete, being able to generate all recursively enumerable sets of natural numbers. It is also proven that completeness is achievable by using a minimal interaction between blocks, i.e. every pair of cells is the input or output for at most one block. It is also shown that the concepts introduced in this paper to define the model may be simulated by more particular communication primitives, including symport, antiport and uniport rules. This enables us to automatically translate a system using interaction rules in any of minimal symport, minimal antiport or conditional uniport P systems.

CELL/SYMBOL COMPLEXITY OF TISSUE P SYSTEMS WITH SYMPORT/ANTIPORT RULES

We consider tissue P systems with symport/antiport rules and investigate their computational power when using only a (very) small number of symbols and cells. Even when using only one symbol, we need at most six (seven when allowing only one channel between a cell and the environment) cells to generate any recursively enumerable set of natural numbers. On the other hand, with only one cell we can only generate regular sets when using one channel with the environment, whereas one cell with two channels between the cell and the environment obtains computational completeness with five symbols. Between these extreme cases of one symbol and one cell, respectively, there seems to be a trade-off between the number of cells and the number of symbols. For example, for the case of tissue P systems with two channels between a cell and the environment we show that computational completeness can be obtained with two cells and three symbols as well as with three cells and two symbols, respectively. Moreover, we also show that some variants of tissue P systems characterize the families of finite or regular sets of natural numbers.

Computing with Membranes

We introduce a new computability model, of a distributed parallel type, based on the notion of a membrane structure. Such a structure consists of several cell-like membranes, recurrently placed inside a unique “skin” membrane. A plane representation is a Venn diagram without intersected sets and with a unique superset. In the regions delimited by the membranes there are placed objects. These objects are assumed to evolve: each object can be transformed in other objects, can pass through a membrane, or can dissolve the membrane in which it is placed. A priority relation between evolution rules can be considered. The evolution is done in parallel for all objects able to evolve. In this way, we obtain a computing device (we call it a P system): start with a certain number of objects in a certain membrane and let the system evolve; if it will halt (no object can further evolve), then the computation is finished, with the result given as the number of objects in a specified membrane. If the development of the system goes forever, then the computation fails to have an output. We prove that the P systems with the possibility of objects to cooperate characterize the recursively enumerable sets of natural numbers; moreover, systems with only two membranes suffice. In fact, we do not need cooperating rules, but we only use catalysts, specified objects which are present in the rules but are not modified by the rule application. One catalyst suffices. A variant is also considered, with the objects being strings over a given alphabet. The evolution rules are now based on string transformations. We investigate the case when either the rewriting operation from Chomsky grammars (with respect to context-free productions) or the splicing operation from H systems investigated in the DNA computing is used. In both cases, characterizations of recursively enumerable languages are obtained by very simple P systems: with three membranes in the rewriting case and four in the splicing case. Several open problems and directions for further research are formulated

COMPUTING WITH MEMBRANES (P SYSTEMS): A VARIANT

Membrane Computing is a recently introduced area of Molecular Computing, where a computation takes place in a membrane structure where multisets of objects evolve according to given rules (they can also pass through membranes). The obtained computing models were called P systems. In basic variants of P systems, the use of objects evolution rules is regulated by a given priority relation; moreover, each membrane has a label and one can send objects to precise membranes, identified by their labels. We propose here a variant where we get rid of both there rather artificial (non-biochemical) features. Instead, we add to membranes and to objects an "electrical charge" and the objects are passed through membranes according to their charge. We prove that such systems are able to characterize the one-letter recursively enumerable languages (equivalently, the recursively enumerable sets of natural numbers), providing that an extra feature is considered: the membranes can be made thicker or thinner (also dissolved) and the communication through a membrane is possible only when its thickness is equal to 1. Several open problems are formulated.

Some representations of Diophantine sets

A set D of natural numbers is called Diophantine if it can be defined in the formwhere P is a polynomial with integer coefficients. Recently, Ju. V. Matijasevič [2], [3] has shown that all recursively enumerable sets are Diophantine. From this, it follows that a bound for n may be given.We use throughout the logical symbols ∧ (and), ∨ (or), → (if … then …), ↔ (if and only if), ⋀ (for every), and ⋁ (there exists); negation does not occur explicitly. The variables range over the natural numbers 0,1,2,3, …, except as otherwise noted.It is the purpose of this paper to show that if we do not insist on prenex form, then every Diophantine set can be defined existentially by a formula in which not more than five existential quantifiers are nested. Besides existential quantifiers, only conjunctions are needed. By Matijasevič [2], [3], the representation extends to all recursively enumerable sets. Using this, we can find a bound for the number of conjuncts needed.Davis [1] proved that every recursively enumerable set of natural numbers can be represented in the formwhere P is a polynomial with integer coefficients. I showed in [5] that we can take λ = 4. (A minor error is corrected in an Appendix to this paper.) By the methods of the present paper, we can again obtain this result, and indeed in a stronger form, with the universal quantifier replaced by a conjunction.