Entry Tear Research Articles

Investigating the role of thrombosis and false lumen orbital orientation in the hemodynamics of Type B aortic dissection

While much about the fundamental mechanisms behind the initiation and progression of Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is still unknown, predictive models based on patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations can help in risk stratification and optimal clinical decision-making. Aiming at the development of personalized treatment, FSI models can be leveraged to investigate the interplay between complex aortic flow patterns and anatomical features, while considering the deformation of the arterial wall and the dissection flap. In this study, the hemodynamics of false lumen thrombosis, a large fenestration, and the orbital orientation of the false lumen is studied through image-based FSI simulations on three TBAD patient-specific geometries. A new pipeline is developed leveraging the open-source software SimVascular and ParaView to analyze multiple patients simultaneously and to achieve large-scale parallelization in FSI results based on patients’ computed tomography (CT) images. The results of this study suggest that the internal orbital orientation of the false lumen contributes to maintaining a positive luminal pressure difference ΔPTL-FL\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\Delta P_{TL-FL}$$\\end{document} = PTL-PFL\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$P_{TL}-P_{FL}$$\\end{document} between the true lumen (TL) and the false lumen (FL), despite an impingement area in the false lumen near the entry tear. A positive and high luminal pressure difference is thought to promote TL expansion and FL compression. Moreover, it was also found that FL thrombosis at the entry tear region reduce the magnitude of the negative luminal pressure difference, which in turn may reduce FL expansion and the risk of unstable aortic growth. Finally, this FSI study suggests that the aortic wall and dissection flap stiffness determines the effects of a large fenestration in the descending thoracic aorta on the luminal pressure difference.

Distal Anastomotic New Entry Tears and Aortic Remodeling Following Type A Dissection Repair: A Systematic Review

Distal Anastomotic New Entry Tears and Aortic Remodeling Following Type A Dissection Repair: A Systematic Review

Physician-modified funnel-shaped covered stent for selective false lumen exclusion in chronic type B aortic dissection.

To describe the technique of off-centering a balloon-expandable covered stent for selective occlusion of a distal entry tear (ET) in a patient, conservatively treated for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD), presenting FL expansion. A 63-year-old male, with conservatively managed cTBAD, presented at follow-up with FL partial thrombosis and expansion (thoracic aorta FL from 21mm to 27mm and abdominal aorta FL from 11mm to 15mm in 6 months). No proximal ET was identifiable. Distal FL perfusion was caused by an ET in the abdominal aorta feeding a 2mm accessory renal artery (ARA). As the aortic diameter was below the threshold for endovascular repair, a selective occlusion of the distal ET and ARA was planned. A balloon-expandable covered stent was modified by off-centering the covered stent proximally and resulting in a funnel-shape occluder after deployment across the ET into the ARA. To prevent type Ic endoleak due to possible FL expansion caused by an intra-operatively detected phrenic artery (PA), coils were deployed into the lumen of the modified stent and the ARA. The pre-discharge computed tomography angiography showed exclusion of both the ARA and ET and a type 2 endoleak from the PA. A balloon-expandable covered stent can be modified by off-centering the covered stent resulting in a funnel shape to adapt to different diameter requirements.

Anatomical Feasibility of Endobentall Strategies for Management of Acute type A Aortic Dissection.

This study assesses the feasibility of acute type A dissections treatment with a dedicated aortic root endograft concept and introduces a new aortic classification. Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a catastrophic aortic condition with perioperative mortality ranging from 12% and 20%. Total Aortic root endovascular repair, "Endobentall concept", has been explored as an alternative but only documented on case report. Imaging study of all consecutive patients treated in three French centers were achieved. The study introduces an adapted aortic classification to report entry tear locations. Measurements included aortic annulus mensuration, coronary height, and several aortic lengths. Two treatment concepts were described "fenestrated Endobentall" and "branched Endobentall". Patients were eligible to the "fenestrated endobentall" design if their aortic root dimensions fitted the Edwards Sapien® and Corevalve Medtronic® instruction for use. Eligibility for the "branched Endobentall" required meeting the criteria for a "fenestrated Endobentall" and having a left coronary main stem length exceeding 5mm. "Branched Endobentall" was mandatory when the entry was located in the aortic root. A total of 250 CT scans for acute type A aortic dissection were reviewed, 116 were finally included for analysis. The primary entry tear was found in the aortic root in 9% of patients, and in 31% of cases, it was located within the first centimeter distal to the sinotubular junction (STJ). 63.7% of the patients were eligible for an Endobentall procedure, even 73.3% when considering extended criterion. Fenestrated Endobentall accounted for 2/3 of cases. In our study, 63.7% of patients with aortic type A dissections are deemed eligible to an "Endobentall repair", increasing to 73.3% when considering extended anatomical criteria.

DeBakey Type III Aortic Dissection Causing Bowel Necrosis: A Case Report

Rationale: Aortic dissection is a life-threatening medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Preoperative mesenteric malperfusion increases the surgical risk and mortality in patients with type B aortic dissection. For DeBakey type III B patients involving most of the thoracoabdominal aorta, endovascular treatment to improve true lumen perfusion may have limited benefits. Organ reperfusion on-time is crucial. Patient concerns: A 38-year-old man was admitted with sudden severe upper abdominal pain. Emergency CTA of the entire aorta revealed an aortic dissection with an entry tear in the descending aortic arch involving the celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, bilateral common iliac arteries and right external iliac artery, with thrombosis in the superior mesenteric artery. Diagnoses: The patient was diagnosed with DeBakey type III aortic dissection with mesenteric artery embolism. Enhanced chest CT showed the entry tear location and involvement of major arteries. Angiography confirmed partial blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery. Interventions: The patient underwent endovascular aortic stent-graft implantation through the left femoral artery, covering the descending aortic arch and sealing the entry tear. Postoperatively, the patient received intensive care, including ventilatory support, CRRT, anti-infection therapy, vasoactive drugs and lumbar cistern drainage. Outcomes: Two weeks postoperatively, the patient developed massive black stools, indicative of intestinal obstruction and necrosis. Exploratory laparotomy revealed ischemic necrosis and rupture of the stomach, small intestine, and colon. Despite surgical efforts, the patient’s condition deteriorated, leading to death from severe infection, acid-base imbalance and multiple organ failure.

A new method for scaling inlet flow waveform in hemodynamic analysis of aortic dissection.

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have shown great potentials in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and postoperative assessment. Patient-specific and well-tuned boundary conditions are key to obtaining accurate and reliable hemodynamic results. However, CFD simulations are usually performed under non-patient-specific flow conditions due to the absence of in vivo flow and pressure measurements. This study proposes a new method to overcome this challenge by tuning inlet boundary conditions using data extracted from electrocardiogram (ECG). Five patient-specific geometric models of type B aortic dissection were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images. Other available data included stoke volume (SV), ECG, and 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ECG waveforms were processed to extract patient-specific systole to diastole ratio (SDR). Inlet boundary conditions were defined based on a generic aortic flow waveform tuned using (1) SV only, and (2) with ECG and SV (ECG + SV). 4D-flow MRI derived inlet boundary conditions were also used in patient-specific simulations to provide the gold standard for comparison and validation. Simulations using inlet flow waveform tuned with ECG + SV not only successfully reproduced flow distributions in the descending aorta but also provided accurate prediction of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) in the primary entry tear (PET) and abdominal regions, as well as maximum pressure difference, ∆Pmax, from the aortic root to the distal false lumen. Compared with simulations with inlet waveform tuned with SV alone, using ECG + SV in the tuning method significantly reduced the error in false lumen ejection fraction at the PET (from 149.1% to 6.2%), reduced errors in TAWSS at the PET (from 54.1% to 5.7%) and in the abdominal region (from 61.3% to 11.1%), and improved ∆Pmax prediction (from 283.1% to 18.8%) However, neither of these inlet waveforms could be used for accurate prediction of TAWSS in the ascending aorta. This study demonstrates the importance of SDR in tailoring inlet flow waveforms for patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. A well-tuned flow waveform is essential for ensuring that the simulation results are patient-specific, thereby enhancing the confidence and fidelity of computational tools in future clinical applications.

Expert Management of Type B Aortic Dissection From Onset With Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair is a key treatment of acute type B aortic dissection. We recognized the importance of managing type B aortic dissections from their onset and established our strategy in 2013. Here, we report the early and late outcomes of our comprehensive strategy for the management of type B aortic dissections. MethodsThis was a single-institution, observational, retrospective study. Between April 2013 and March 2024, 227 consecutive patients with acute type B aortic dissection were admitted to our institute and treated by our strategy. Early and late outcomes were also assessed for all patients. ResultsThoracic endovascular aortic repair plus optimal medical treatment was performed to close the primary entry tear in 90 patients (40%) in the acute (12%), subacute (14%), and chronic (14%) phases. Optimal medical treatment alone was performed in 137 patients (60%). The early and late outcomes showed significant improvement. ConclusionsOur strategy provided excellent early and late outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection, avoided postoperative paraplegia, and completely prevented thoracoabdominal aortic replacement.

A novel hybrid prosthesis for open repair of acute DeBakey type I dissection with malperfusion: Early results from the PERSEVERE trial

BackgroundOutcomes after hemiarch repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (ADTI) remain unfavorable, with high rates of major adverse events and negative aortic remodeling. The PERSEVERE study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the AMDS Hybrid prosthesis, a novel bare metal stent, in patients presenting with preoperative malperfusion. MethodsPERSEVERE is a prospective single-arm investigational study conducted at 26 sites in the United States. Ninety-three patients underwent ADTI aortic dissection repair with AMDS implantation. The 30-day primary endpoints are a composite rate of 4 major adverse events and the rate of distal anastomotic new entry tears. The secondary endpoints include aortic remodeling. ResultsClinical malperfusion was documented in 76 patients (82%); only radiographic malperfusion, in 17 (18%). The median follow-up in the 93 patients was 5.6 months. Within 30 days, 9 patients died (9.7%), 10 patients (10.8%) experienced new disabling stroke, and 18 patients (19.4%) had new-onset renal failure requiring ≥1 dialysis treatment. There were no cases of myocardial infarction. The composite rate of major adverse events (27%) was lower than that reported in the reference cohort (58%). There were no distal anastomotic new entry tears. Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients. Early remodeling indicated total aortic diameter stability, true lumen expansion, and false lumen reduction in the treated aortic segment. ConclusionsEarly results show significant reductions in major adverse events and distal anastomotic new entry tears, successfully meeting both primary endpoints. The technical success rate was high. AMDS can be used safely in patients with ADTI dissection with malperfusion.

Early outcomes of total arch replacement in the treatment of aortic dissection

Abstract: Overview: Aortic dissection are severe pathologies with high mortality and complication rates post-surgery despite significant advancements in both diagnosis and surgical treatment. Aortic arch replacement surgery is a classic and highly effective treatment method at Cho Ray Hospital. Objectives: Describe clinical, paraclinical characteristics, postoperative results, general complications and early hospital mortality. Methods: Descriptive cross sectional study. Results: 102 patients underwent aortic arch replacement surgery due to aortic dissection. Males predominated at 72.5%. The male:female ratio was 2.5:1. The average age was 56.45 ± 11.79 years. A history of hypertension was present in 81.4% of cases. Most patients with aortic dissection were admitted in an acute condition, accounting for 95%. Patients with type A aortic dissection accounted for 87.3%, with the entry tear in the ascending aorta at 27.5%. Isolated aortic arch replacement was performed in 46.1% of patients, while 53.9% underwent aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique. 7 patients required aortic root replacement, 7 needed aortic valve surgery, and 10 required CABG. Most patients were cooled to 25 degrees C with cerebral perfusion to three branches. Ascending aorta cannulation was established in 45.2% of cases. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time was 257.7 minutes, with selective cerebral perfusion time at 115.9 minutes and lower body circulatory arrest time averaging 57.2 minutes. Postoperative neurological complications occurred in 10.8%, and the rate of renal failure requiring dialysis was 17.8%. The mortality rate was 9.6%. Longer cardiopulmonary bypass times and body temperatures above 25 degrees significantly increased the rate of postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis. Patients with postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis had a statistically significant increase in postoperative mortality rates. Aortic root intervention surgery combined with arch replacement did not affect the rate of postoperative complications. Aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique did not affect cardiopulmonary bypass time, clamping time, or the rate of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Total arch replacement at Cho Ray Hospital initially showed a safe and effective with acceptable mortality rate.

Intravascular Ultrasound Enhances the PETTICOAT Technique in Endovascular Therapy for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection with Malperfusion Syndrome

ObjectiveTo present the value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in diagnosis and treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection (TBD) with malperfusion (MP). Especially the value of IVUS regarding the treatment strategy, reoperation rate, acute kidney injury (AKI) and false lumen thrombosis (FLT) was investigated. MethodsRetrospective analysis of 25 TBD cases with MP treated with endovascular therapy from April 2019 to August 2022. In 17 cases angiography & IVUS were applied during the operation (IVUS group) and in 8 cases angiography was used without IVUS (control group) for final intraoperative control. IVUS was used to assess the true lumen collapse and to decide if additional bare stenting was necessary or not. Details from patients’ charts and documentation from surgeries were analyzed. The endovascular technique included thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with primary entry sealing and -if needed- bare stenting of the true lumen distal of the entry tears using the PETTICOAT (Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment) technique. ResultsAll patients presented with pain localized mostly (48%) in thorax and abdomen. In all patients the proximal entry tear of the dissection was covered using TEVAR. The PETTICOAT technique was applied in 13 cases (52%), whereas most combined procedures were applied in the IVUS group (12 compared to 1; p=0,02). A total of 3 patients (1 in the control group; 12,5% and 2 in the IVUS group; 11,8%) underwent a bowel resection. Totally 8 patients (32%) underwent a reoperation in aorta (3 during the hospital stay). There were no statistical differences between IVUS and control group regarding the preoperative findings, the reoperation rates and the postoperative complications. 5 patients died (4 during the hospital stay), 1 in control and 4 in IVUS group; p=0,53. The follow up included a clinical and a computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination. No statistically significant difference regarding occurrence and extension of FLT was observed between the two groups. ConclusionsThe IVUS and control groups showed no difference in survival rates. The use of IVUS extended the indication for PETTICOAT technique with statistically significant difference. A milder form of AKI presented in the IVUS group compared to the control group. In addition, a stronger correlation between IVUS and the avoidance of an aorta reoperation was observed, though it did not reach statistical significance.

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years.

The treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is currently a challenge for vascular surgeons, because of the early morbidity and mortality rates and the high risk of late aortic events up to 50% at 5 years. This study presents the initial outcomes of ATBAD treatment using optimal medical therapy alone or combined with proximal entry tear stent-graft coverage. Additionally, it provides an analysis of the evolution of the aortic diameter and its clinical consequences during the chronic phase in each group. Conducted as a retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled all consecutive ATBAD patients (n=130) treated between 2008 and 2020. The primary analysis studies the entire patient cohort based on their initial management approach, namely, medical treatment alone for uncomplicated ATBAD (n=67) or combined with stent-graft entry tear coverage (n=63). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate factors associated with disease progression in the medical management group. Median follow-up was 29.5 months. During this time aneurysmal evolution was observed in: 42.4% of cases in the medical group compared with 21.8% in the stent-graft group, primarily affecting the thoracic aorta. The stent-graft group exhibited significant aortic remodeling, with a decrease in false lumen (FL) and thoracic aortic diameters. Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and FL ≥22 mm were independent risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. Five-year survival was consistent at 76.1% in both groups. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of stent-graft entry tear coverage for ATBAD. Initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) appears to reduce late aortic events by promoting aortic remodeling. Considering TEVAR's safety and potential to prevent late aortic complications, it may be considered for uncomplicated ATBAD patients with an initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm or an FL ≥22 mm. This study validates the efficacy and safety of using endovascular stent grafts to seal the proximal entry tear in cases of acute type B aortic dissections, compared to optimal medical therapy. Aortic remodelling significantly benefits from endovascular stent graft coverage of the proximal entry tear. Given the heightened risk of late aortic events observed in the medical therapy cohort, there appears to be a necessity for including endovascular interventions in the management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections, particularly when aortic diameter is ≥40 mm and false lumen diameter is ≥22 mm.

The association between sex and outcomes after thoracic endovascular repair for acute type B aortic dissection

ObjectivePrior literature has found worse outcomes for female patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm and mixed findings after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm. However, the influence of sex on outcomes after TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD) is not fully elucidated. MethodsWe identified patients who underwent TEVAR for aTBAD (<30 days) in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2022. We excluded patients with an entry tear or stent seal within the ascending aorta or aortic arch and patients with an unknown proximal tear location. Included patients were stratified by biological sex, and we analyzed perioperative outcomes and 5-year mortality with multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression analysis, respectively. Furthermore, we analyzed adjusted variables for interaction with female sex. ResultsWe included 1626 patients, 33% of whom were female. At presentation, female patients were significantly older (65 [interquartile range: 54, 75] years vs 56 [interquartile range: 49, 68] years; P = .01). Regarding indications for repair, female patients had higher rates of pain (85% vs 80%; P = .02) and lower rates of malperfusion (23% vs 35%; P < .001), specifically mesenteric, renal, and lower limb malperfusion. Female patients had a lower proportion of proximal repairs in zone 2 (39% vs 48%; P < .01). After TEVAR for aTBAD, female sex was associated with comparable odds of perioperative mortality to males (8.1 vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-1.20]). Regarding perioperative complications, female sex was associated with lower odds for cardiac complications (2.3% vs 4.7%; aOR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.26-0.97]), but all other complications were comparable between sexes. Compared with male sex, female sex was associated with similar risk for 5-year mortality (26% vs 23%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.77-1.32]). On testing variables for interaction with sex, female sex was associated with lower perioperative and 5-year mortality at older ages relative to males (aOR: 0.96 [0.93-0.99] | adjusted hazard ratio: 0.97 [0.95-0.99]) and higher odds of perioperative mortality when mesenteric malperfusion was present (OR: 2.71 [1.04-6.96]). ConclusionsFemale patients were older, less likely to have complicated dissection, and had more distal proximal landing zones. After TEVAR for aTBAD, female sex was associated with similar perioperative and 5-year mortality to male sex, but lower odds of in-hospital cardiac complications. Interaction analysis showed that females were at additional risk for perioperative mortality when mesenteric ischemia was present. These data suggest that TEVAR for aTBAD overall has a similar safety profile in females as it does for males.

Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Secondary Aortic Intervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Dissection.

Secondary aortic intervention (SAI) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is not uncommon. However, a satisfactory management system has not been established for these patients. We aimed to report our single-center experience with SAI after prior TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). From January 2010 to May 2017, 860 eligible patients with TBAD underwent TEVAR. One hundred seven (12.4%) patients required SAI, either endovascularly (n=76) or surgically (n=31). The main indications for SAI were entry flow (n=58 [54.2%]), aneurysm expansion of the proximal or remote aorta (n=26 [24.3%]), retrograde type A aortic dissection (n=11 [10.3%]), distal stent-graft-induced new entry tear (n=6 [5.6%]), and stent migration (n=4 [3.7%]). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine the degree of freedom from SAI and the prognosis. Cox proportional hazards were used to screen for risk factors for SAI and poor prognosis. The overall 30-day mortality rate after SAI was 4.7% (n=5): endovascular (n=2 [2.6%]) vs open surgery (n=3 [9.7%]; p=0.145). The cumulative survival rates with or without SAI were 86.3%±3.6% vs 95.7%±0.8% at 3 years and 82.0%±4.2% vs 92.2%±1.1% at 5 years, respectively (log-rank p<0.001). Although no significant difference in survival was observed, the incidence of SAI was significantly greater in patients who underwent TEVAR during the chronic phase (acute [11.6%] vs subacute [9.6%] vs chronic [27.8]; p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that prior TEVAR in the chronic phase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-2.90; p=0.039), maximum aortic diameter (HR=1.05, 95% CI=1.04-1.07; p<0.001), and arch involvement (HR=1.48, 95% CI=1.01-2.18; p=0.048) were predictors of the incidence of SAI. In addition, the maximum aortic diameter was demonstrated to be the only risk factor for prognosis after adjusting for confounding factors. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic TBAD patients should be reconsidered. Open surgery is preferable for those with proximal progression, whereas endovascular treatment is more suitable for distal lesions. Close surveillance and timely reintervention after TEVAR, whether via endovascular techniques or open surgery, are necessary to prevent devastating complications. The management of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is challenging. We summarized our single-center experience regarding secondary aortic intervention after TEVAR for TBAD. We found that TEVAR for chronic TBAD patients should be carefully evaulated, and open surgery is recommended for those with proximal progession, while endovascular treatment is more preferable for distal lesions.

Spinal cord ischemia and reinterventions following thoracic endovascular repair for acute type B aortic dissections

ObjectiveThe technical aspects of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), specifically the location of proximal seal zone (PSZ) (need to cover the left subclavian artery [LSA]), distal seal zone (DSZ) (length of aortic coverage), benefit of LSA revascularization, and prophylactic lumbar drainage are still debated. Each of these issues has potential benefits but also has known risks. This study aims to identify factors associated with reintervention and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following TEVAR for acute TBAD with a zone 3 entry tear. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for TEVARs performed for acute TBAD with zone 3 entry tear, zone 3 proximal zone of disease, treated with TEVAR extending between zone 2 and zone 5. The primary outcomes were SCI and related reintervention. Secondary outcomes were stroke, arm ischemia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). The exposure variables were PSZ 2 vs 3, DSZ 4 vs 5, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA revascularization. Univariate analyses were conducted with χ2 analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association with outcomes. ResultsOf 583 patients who met inclusion criteria, 266 had PSZ 2 and 317 had PSZ 3. On univariate analysis, PSZ 2 was associated with a higher rate of reintervention, but PSZ2 was not significant on multivariable analysis after accounting for age, sex, race, smoking, PSZ, DSZ, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA patency. PSZ 2 was not associated with SCI, arm ischemia, or RTAD. PSZ 2 was associated with a trend towards a higher rate of stroke. DSZ 4 and DSZ 5 were performed in 161 and 422 TEVARs, respectively, and DSZ 5 was associated with a higher rate of SCI on univariate (3 [1.9%] vs 39 [9.2%]; P = .01) and multivariable (odds ratio, 7.384; 95% confidence interval, 2.193-24.867; P = .001) analyses. Prophylactic lumbar drain placement was not statistically significantly associated with SCI, but lack of postoperative LSA patency was associated with SCI (odds ratio, 2.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.016-8.656; P = .05). ConclusionsThis study found that PSZ 2 was not associated with lower reinterventions or higher rates of SCI but trended towards a higher rate of stroke than PSZ 3. Additionally, DSZ 5 was strongly associated with SCI when compared with DSZ 4, highlighting the importance of limiting aortic coverage to coverage of the proximal entry tear when possible.

Impact of Residual Entry Tears in the Descending Aorta After Type A Dissection

BackgroundAggressive resection/exclusion of the primary entry in the descending aorta remains controversial in older patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We investigated the effect of residual primary entry in the descending aorta in younger and older groups. MethodsPatients with ATAAD who underwent emergency operation (n = 1103) were divided into younger (<70 years; n = 681) and older (≥70 years; n = 422) cohorts. Each cohort was further divided into groups with or without residual primary entry in the descending aorta. After propensity score matching, 179 and 71 matched pairs were obtained in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Surgical outcomes were compared between the residual and nonresidual groups in each age cohort. ResultsIn the younger cohort, the cumulative incidence rate of distal aortic events was significantly higher in the residual than in the nonresidual group at 10 years (35% [95% CI, 27%-44%] vs 22% [95% CI, 15%-31%], P = .001). However, in the older group, residual or nonresidual primary entry did not affect the rates at 10 years (11% [95% CI, 5%-20%] vs 9% [95% CI, 4%-17%], P = .75). Multivariate analysis identified age <70 years (hazard ratio, 2.188; 95% CI, 1.493-3.205; P < .001) and residual primary entry at the descending aorta (hazard ratio, 2.142; 95% CI, 1.559-2.943; P < .001) as significant predictors for distal aortic events. ConclusionsAggressive resection/exclusion of the primary entry in the descending aorta should be considered for patients aged <70 years to avoid distal aortic events; however, it might not always be appropriate for the older patients ≥70 years.

Primary Entry Tears in the Descending Thoracic Aorta: The Devil Is in the Details

Primary Entry Tears in the Descending Thoracic Aorta: The Devil Is in the Details

Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review.

In this new millennial, endovascular strategies have revolutionized the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). With reduced in-hospital mortality and good long-term outcomes TEVAR has become the gold standard for the treatment of complicated dissection and is gaining increasing support for its preventive applicability in some uncomplicated dissections. With this new paradigm came a shift of the treatment goal where just covering the entry tear is not enough and instead achieving long-term positive thoracoabdominal remodeling is needed. More extensive approaches with composite device designs (covered stent graft and bare metal stent) emerged to answer this aortic conundrum. At 5-year of follow-up, "Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete Attachment technique" (PETTICOAT) and its evolution "Stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair" (STABILISE) seem to be safe techniques that can allow, when anatomically feasible, excellent aortic remodeling and, in some cases, even the healing of the dissection. Nevertheless, STABILISE results, although promising, are mostly based on small series and therefore need to be validated by analyzing medium-long-term results from the international registry. Given the plethora of new data and the disparity of expert opinions on the best treatment to adopt, in this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the results of these different strategies for acute TBAD.

The frozen elephant trunk: seeking a more definitive treatment for acute type A aortic dissection.

Conventional treatment for type A aortic dissection includes replacement of the ascending aorta with an open distal anastomosis in the hemiarch position. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) is a hybrid technique that extends the repair to the descending thoracic aorta. The goal is to improve resolution of malperfusion syndrome and to induce positive aortic remodelling and reduce the need for reintervention on the downstream aorta. We aim to summarize the data on the short and long-term outcomes of this technique. A thorough search of the literature was conducted isolating all articles dealing with aortic remodelling after the use of FET in case of type A acute aortic dissection. Keywords 'aortic dissection', 'frozen elephant trunk', 'aortic remodelling' and 'false lumen thrombosis' were used. Data for type B and chronic aortic dissections were excluded. FET use favourably influences aortic remodelling. The main advantages lie in the exclusion of distal entry tears in either the aortic arch or descending aorta thus restoring antegrade blood flow in the true lumen and inducing false lumen thrombosis. False lumen thrombosis is not only induced at the level of the stent deployment but also lower in the distal descending aorta. Moreover, it offers an adequate landing zone in the mid-descending aorta for second-stage endovascular or open surgical aortic repair, if needed. FET can be advantageous in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection dealing with extended aortic pathology.

Pre-emptive False Lumen Embolization to Prevent Persistent Type II Endoleak in Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Post-Dissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

The purpose was to describe a technique to promote false lumen (FL) thrombosis in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAAs) managed by fenestrated/branched endografting (F/B-EVAR). A 5/6Fr-90 cm length sheath is advanced from the true lumen (TL) to FL through the most distal entry tear of the infrarenal aorta or iliac arteries. It is parked in the most cranial portion of the FL in the thoracic aorta. Aortic endografts are deployed in the TL excluding all the para-visceral/distal entry tears and target visceral vessels bridging stenting is performed. A selective FL angiography is performed through the 5/6Fr sheath to detect the origin of all segmentary arteries. Embolization of FL is performed from above to below by M-reye pushable coils, obtaining the packaging of FL. After completion angiography, the 5/6Fr sheath is retrieved in external iliac artery and molding ballooning of the distal segment of the aortic/iliac endograft is performed. Between 2019 and 2023, this technique was applied in 11cases with a median number of 73 (interquartile range [IQR=12) coils. Out of 8 (72%) patients with available radiological follow-up at 1 year, 7 exhibited complete FL thrombosis. The FL coiling in PD-TAAAs managed by F/B-EVAR is feasible, safe, and effective to promote the complete FL thrombosis. Preemptive false lumen embolization is a feasible, safe, and effective technique for preventing persistent type II endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. This technique may be routinely recommended to promote FL thrombosis and aortic remodeling after FB-EVAR in PD-TAAAs, thereby reducing the incidence of reinterventions during follow-up.

Efficacy of intentional undersized thoracic endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection

ObjectiveThoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of aortic dissection. Endograft oversizing is a risk factor for stent graft-induced new entry tears and retrograde type A aortic dissection. However, there is no clear consensus on the optimal graft size selection for Stanford type B acute or subacute aortic dissection (TBAD). Herein, we examined the safety and efficacy of TEVAR using an intentionally undersized endograft to treat TBAD. MethodsThis retrospective chart review study included 82 patients who underwent TEVAR for acute or subacute Stanford TBAD between 2015 and 2022. We measured the true lumen diameter just distal to the subclavian artery and opted for a stent graft of the same diameter. In instances where deformation resulting from false lumen pressure displacement was pronounced, we measured the diameter at the site just proximal to the subclavian artery. Patients’ characteristics, procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data, and aortic remodeling were analyzed. The aortic diameter was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test. Survival and freedom from reintervention were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. ResultsThe follow-up rate was 98.4%. The mean age was 58.3 ± 12.3 years, and 76 were men (92.7%). The mean diameters of the stent graft and native proximal landing zone were 30.9 ± 3.2 mm and 30.8 ± 3.0 mm, respectively. The oversize rate of the stent graft in relation to the native proximal aortic diameter was 0.3% ± 4.7%. In-hospital mortality was observed in one patient, retrograde type A aortic dissection in one patient, distal stent graft-induced new entry tear in zero patients, and type 1a endoleak in 22 patients (26.8%). Type 1a endoleaks, characterized by antegrade false lumen blood flow originating from the primary entry, in 12 patients spontaneously disappeared within 1 year of follow-up. According to aortic remodeling, 59 patients (86.8%) achieved complete aortic remodeling at the aortic arch level and 51 (75.0%) at the eighth thoracic vertebral level. The diameters of the aortic arch and descending aorta were significantly reduced compared with the postoperative measurements (P <.001). Survival rates were 97.5% and 93.6% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 84.7% and 84.7% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. ConclusionsIntentionally undersized TEVAR was safe and achieved acceptable aortic remodeling despite a high rate of type 1a endoleaks. A type 1a endoleak was acceptable as it primarily diminished during the mid-term follow-up.