ENTRUST-AF Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing triple versus dual antithrombotic therapy on risk reduction of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation patients

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and CAD frequently coexist. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) - i.e., aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor- to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with AF and CAD are at risk of stroke. Stroke risk is reduced with oral anticoagulant therapy (warfarin) or one of the direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs). Patients treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT)- i.e., DAPT plus oral anticoagulant therapy- suffer higher risk of major or clinically significant bleeding compared with DAT (P2Y12 and DOAC). This appeared to be statistically significant in most but not all of the randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, it is unclear whether the risk of stent thrombosis/MI might be higher in patients treated with DAT. Previous meta-analyses have yielded conflicting conclusions. Purpose To determine the optimum antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD requiring PCI and/or ACS regarding the incidence of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Methods A comprehensive literature search was done identifying all RCTs on the efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and ACS or PCI. A meta-analysis was performed to test the hypothesis that TAT significantly reduces the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) and MI. Results A total of 11,542 patients were included in the 5 RCTs, comparing TAT vs DAT – i.e., WOEST Trial 2013 [1], PIONEER AF-PCI 2016 [2], RE-DUAL PCI 2017 [3], ENTRUST-AF PCI 2019 [4], AUGUSTUS 2019 [5]. Triple therapy did not lead to significant reduction in risk of Myocardial Infarction (MI) [risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.69–1.04, P=0.12], or Stent Thrombosis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51–1.12, P=0.16). [Figure 1] On the other hand, the risk of major bleeding or clinically significant bleeding is significantly lower with DAT [Figure 2]. Conclusion DAT comprising of warfarin or DOAC and P2Y12 inhibitor reduced risk of major or clinically significant bleeding without increasing the risk of ST or recurrent MI as compared to TAT. The results encourage the use of DAT rather than TAT in patients with ACS and/or patients requiring PCI with AF who require combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Major bleeding risk

Edoxaban in atrial fibrillation with PCI by ACS or stable CAD presentation: a pre-specified analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial

Abstract Aim We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of edoxaban in combination with P2Y12 inhibition in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods and results This is a pre-specified sub-analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to an edoxaban or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) based strategy and randomisation was stratified by ACS (edoxaban n=388, vitamin K n=389) vs. SCAD (edoxaban n=363, vitamin K=366). Participants received edoxaban 60mg once daily plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months; or VKA in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin 100mg (for 1–12 months). The primary bleeding endpoint, a composite of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major or clinical relevant non-major bleeding, at 12 months occurred in 59 (18.52%/year) vs 79 (26.21%/year) ACS patients (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.591–1.018, P=0.0631), and in 69 (23.11%/year) vs 73 (25.02%/year) SCAD patients (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.676–1.305, P=0.7082) with edoxaban and VKA based therapies, respectively (P for interaction [P-int]=0.2741). The main efficacy endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or definite stent thrombosis) occurred in 33 (9.59%/year) vs 28 (8.21%/year) ACS-patients (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.697–1.916) compared with 16 (4.84%/year) vs 18 (5.47%/year) SCAD-patients (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.465–1.781) with edoxaban and VKA based therapy, respectively (P-int=0.5573). Conclusions An antithrombotic regimen consisting of edoxaban and a P2Y12-inhibitor without aspirin provides equal safety and similar efficacy for ischaemic events in patients with AF regardless of their clinical presentation with ACS or SCAD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH

Clinical risk predictors in atrial fibrillation patients following successful coronary stenting: ENTRUST-AF PCI sub-analysis

AimsThis subgroup analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866175; Date of registration: August 2016) evaluated type of AF, and CHA2DS2-VASc score parameters as predictors for clinical outcome.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to either edoxaban (60 mg/30 mg once daily [OD]; n = 751) plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months or a vitamin K antagonist [VKA] (n = 755) plus a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin (100 mg OD, for 1–12 months). The primary outcome was a composite of major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNM) within 12 months. The composite efficacy endpoint consisted of cardiovascular death, stroke, systemic embolic events, myocardial infarction (MI), and definite stent thrombosis.ResultsMajor/CRNM bleeding event rates were 20.7%/year and 25.6%/year with edoxaban and warfarin, respectively (HR [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.654–1.047]). The event rates of composite outcome were 7.26%/year and 6.86%/year, respectively (HR [95% CI]): 1.06 [0.711–1.587]), and of overall net clinical benefit were 12.48%/year and 12.80%/year, respectively (HR [(95% CI]: 0.99 [(0.730; 1.343]). Increasing CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with increased rates of all outcomes. CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 was a marker for stent thrombosis. Paroxysmal AF was associated with a higher occurrence of MI (4.87% versus 2.01%, p = 0.0024).ConclusionAfter PCI in AF patients, increasing CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with increased bleeding rates and CHA2DS2-VASc score (≥ 5) predicted the occurrence of stent thrombosis. Paroxysmal AF was associated with MI. These findings may have important clinical implications in AF patients.

Edoxaban in atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention by acute or chronic coronary syndrome presentation: a pre-specified analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial

Aims To compare the safety and efficacy of edoxaban combined with P2Y12 inhibition following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).Methods and results In this pre-specified sub-analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to edoxaban- or vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-based strategy and randomization was stratified by ACS (edoxaban n = 388, VKA n = 389) vs. CCS (edoxaban n = 363, VKA = 366). Participants received edoxaban 60 mg once-daily plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months, or VKA combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin 100 mg (for 1–12 months). The primary bleeding endpoint at 12 months occurred in 59 (15.2%) vs. 79 (20.3%) ACS patients [hazard ratio (HR): 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59–1.02, P = 0.063], and in 69 (19.0%) vs. 73 (19.9%) CCS patients (HR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.68–1.31, P = 0.708) with edoxaban- and VKA-based therapy, respectively [P for interaction (P-int) = 0.2741]. The main secondary endpoint (composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolic events, or definite stent thrombosis) in ACS patients was 33 (8.5%) vs. 28 (7.2%) (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.70–1.92), compared with 16 (4.4%) vs. 18 (4.9%) (HR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.47–1.78) CCS patients with edoxaban and VKA-based therapy, respectively (P-int = 0.5573).Conclusions In patients with AF who underwent PCI, the edoxaban-based regimen, as compared with VKA-based regimen, provides consistent safety and similar efficacy for ischaemic events in patients with AF regardless of their clinical presentation.

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.

Background: Our study aims to perform a meta-analysis of benefits and risks associated with the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a particular focus on the combination type: dual vs. dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: NOAC + single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. DAT: VKA + SAPT), dual vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (DAT: NOAC + SAPT vs. TAT: VKA + dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) or triple vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: NOAC+DAPT vs. TAT: VKA+DAPT). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing antithrombotic regimens. Four randomized studies (n = 10.969; PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, AUGUSTUS, and ENTRUST-AF PCI) were included. The primary outcome was the composite of major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) and clinically relevant bleeding requiring medical intervention (CRNM). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and stent thrombosis (ST). Results: Combination strategies with NOACs were associated with reduced risk of major bleeding events across different combination strategies as compared to VKA, with the most significant risk reduction when DAT was compared with TAT, namely DAT with NOAC + SAPT was associated with a 37% relative risk reduction (RRR) of major bleeding events as compared to TAT with VKA + DAPT (RR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50–0.80). The reduction of major bleeding risks is a class effect of NOACs. Combination strategies of NOACs vs. VKAs resulted in a comparable risk of MACE, MI, stroke, ST, or death. Conclusions: Antithrombotic combinations of NOACs (as DAT or TAT) are safer than VKAs with respect to bleeding risk and result in a satisfactory efficacy with no increase of ischemic or thrombotic events in patients undergoing PCI.

Is dual therapy the correct strategy in frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence are age-related and are growing in the last years. Age is a risk factor also for coronary artery disease (CAD), and with the evolution of preventive care, the first event (acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) takes place at a later age. If elderly patients with AF and CAD undergo ACS or PCI, they have indication to assume triple therapy. Triple therapy (oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) exposes patients to high bleeding risk. In the last 10 years, several clinical trials have tested dual therapy (OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy) in AF patients who undergo ACS or elective PCI. WOEST trial has tested warfarin + clopidogrel against triple therapy. PIONEER AF-PCI trial has tested low-dose rivaroxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor or very low-dose rivaroxaban + DAPT against standard triple therapy with warfarin. RE-DUAL PCI trial has tested two doses of dabigatran + P2Y12 inhibitor against standard triple therapy with Warfarin. AUGUSTUS trial has tested apixaban against warfarin both in dual therapy with P2Y12 inhibitor and in triple therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin. ENTRUST-AF PCI, last published study, has tested edoxaban + P2Y12 inhibitor against triple therapy. All these trials show dual therapy reduces significantly bleeding risk than triple therapy. In this paper, we analyze these clinical trials to understand if dual therapy results can be applied to elderly patients and what is probably the better approach in elderly AF patients undergo to ACS or PCI.

Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

We aimed to assess the safety of edoxaban in combination with P2Y12 inhibition in patients with atrial fibrillation who had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ENTRUST-AF PCI was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3b trial with masked outcome evaluation, done at 186 sites in 18 countries. Patients had atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, were aged at least 18 years, and had a successful PCI for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) from 4 h to 5 days after PCI using concealed, stratified, and blocked web-based central randomisation to either edoxaban (60 mg once daily) plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin (100 mg once daily, for 1-12 months). The edoxaban dose was reduced to 30 mg per day if one or more factors (creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, bodyweight ≤60 kg, or concomitant use of specified potent P-glycoprotein inhibitors) were present. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding within 12 months. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02866175, is closed to new participants, and follow-up is completed. From Feb 24, 2017, through May 7, 2018, 1506 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the edoxaban regimen (n=751) or VKA regimen (n=755). Median time from PCI to randomisation was 45·1 h (IQR 22·2-76·2). Major or CRNM bleeding events occurred in 128 (17%) of 751 patients (annualised event rate 20·7%) with the edoxaban regimen and 152 (20%) of 755 patients (annualised event rate 25·6%) patients with the VKA regimen; hazard ratio 0·83 (95% CI 0·65-1·05; p=0·0010 for non-inferiority, margin hazard ratio 1·20; p=0·1154 for superiority). In patients with atrial fibrillation who had PCI, the edoxaban-based regimen was non-inferior for bleeding compared with the VKA-based regimen, without significant differences in ischaemic events. Daiichi Sankyo.

Antithrombotische Therapie bei akutem Koronarsyndrom und Vorhofflimmern

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing due to the aging of the population. In addition, the number of patients with AF and indications for oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the prevention of stroke, who need dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus aP2Y12 inhibitor because of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is also increasing. In the past these patients received atriple therapy (TT) for 3-12months. This TT has never been studied for efficacy; however, the rate of bleeding complications in comparison to a simple OAC or DAPT is significantly higher. Registries and smaller trials showed that DAPT with an OAC plus aplatelet inhibitor may be sufficient to prevent stroke and stent thromboses/myocardial infarctions. These questions were investigated in various prospective and randomized studies involving all four non-vitaminK oral anticoagulants (NOAC) approved for stroke prevention in AF. The NOACs were tested against vitaminK antagonists (VKA) involving single antiplatelet therapy without using DAPT. The trials with rivaroxaban (PIONEER AF-PCI) and dabigatran (RE-DUAL PCI) have already been published but the investigations involving apixaban (AUGUSTUS) and edoxaban (ENTRUST-AF PCI) are still ongoing. The current status is that aNOAC plus asingle antiplatelet agent, mostly clopidogrel, is superior to TT with VKA with respect to bleeding complications without any obvious disadvantage due to increases in stroke cases or cardiac ischemia. The international guidelines already permit treatment without TT in cases where the bleeding risk is prevalent. In this situation it is recommended to prescribe aNOAC plus asingle antiplatelet therapy. Thus, TT no longer seems to be indicated for most patients with AF and after ACS or PCI.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of an edoxaban-based antithrombotic regimen in patients with atrial fibrillation following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement: Rationale and design of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial

The optimal antithrombotic treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, edoxaban was noninferior to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with respect to the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism and was associated with significantly lower rates of bleeding and cardiovascular death in patients with nonvalvular AF. The effects of edoxaban in combination with single- or dual-antiplatelet therapy in the setting of PCI are unexplored. The ENTRUST-AF PCI trial is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3b trial with blinded end point evaluation involving 1,500 patients on oral anticoagulation for AF. Patients are randomized between 4 hours and 5 days after successful PCI to either an edoxaban-based strategy (experimental arm; 60 mg [or 30 mg according to dose reduction criteria] once daily plus a P2Y12 antagonist [default clopidogrel, 75 mg once daily] for 12 months) or a VKA-based strategy (control arm; VKA plus a P2Y12 antagonist [as above] plus acetylsalicylic acid [100 mg once daily] for 30 days to 12 months). The primary safety end point is the incidence of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The main efficacy end point is the composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, systemic embolic events, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis. The ENTRUST-AF PCI trial tests the hypothesis that an edoxaban-based antithrombotic strategy reduces the risk of bleeding complications after PCI compared with VKA plus conventional dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF in need of oral anticoagulation. The relative risk of ischemic events between groups will be compared.