Enteroblastic Differentiation Research Articles

Stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation with 5-year relapse-free survival after D2 gastrectomy and chemotherapy: A case report

BackgroundGastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GACED), a rare subtype of gastric cancer, is associated with a more aggressive behavior than conventional gastric adenocarcinomas. We report a rare case of stage IV GACED treated with D2 gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy.Case presentationA 39-year-old woman with acute upper abdominal pain immediately underwent surgery for gastric perforation. Afterward she was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the pylorus. D2 gastrectomy was performed and the final pathological diagnosis was stage IV GACED with positive peritoneal cytology. Postoperative chemotherapy was initiated with S1 plus oxaliplatin for 1 year, which was ceased thereafter to enhance her quality of life. The patient survived more than 5 years without relapse after gastrectomy.ConclusionsStage IV GACED, determined by positive spalt-like transcription factor 4, can be successfully treated with surgery and chemotherapy.

Colorectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: a clinicopathological analysis of eight cases

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features of colorectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (CAED). Methods: Eight cases of CAED diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China from January 2017 to August 2023 were collected. The histopathological, immunohistochemical, molecular and prognostic features of 8 CAED cases were analyzed. The relevant studies were also reviewed. Results: Among the eight patients, there were six males and two females, with an average age of 58 years (range: 29-77 years, median age: 61.5 years). Preoperative serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were elevated in five patients (14.0-286.6 μg/L). Four tumors were located in the colon, and four tumors in the rectum. Two patients were clinically staged as advanced stage (stage Ⅳ), and distant metastasis occurred at the initial diagnosis (one case had liver metastasis, and the other had lung, bone and multiple lymph nodes metastases). Six patients were clinically staged as locally-advanced stage (Stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ). Three of them developed distant metastases after surgery (one case had liver metastasis, one case had lung metastasis, and one case had peritoneal metastasis). Additionally, two patients died at 9 months and 24 months after surgery, respectively. The tumors were composed of various proportions of adenocarcinoma components with enteroblastic differentiation (30%-100%) and classical tubular adenocarcinoma components. The component with enteroblastic differentiation exhibited morphology similar to embryonic intestinal epithelium: cuboidal or columnar tumor cells arranged in tubular, papillary, cribriform, or solid nest patterns, with clear cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical studies showed that tumor cells expressed at least one oncofetal protein (SALL4, Glypican-3, and AFP). In addition, focal squamous differentiation was observed in 3 cases (3/8). Compared to the primary tumor, both CAED and squamous differentiation components were increased in the metastatic tumors. Based on the sequencing results of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF of the primary and/or metastatic tumors, 5 cases were wild-type, while KRAS exon 2 (G13D) mutations were identified in 2 cases. Conclusions: CAED is a rare colorectal malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Accurate pathological diagnosis is prognostically valuable. The histological features of enteroblastic differentiation, elevated serum AFP levels, and the expression of oncofetal proteins play an important role in the tumor diagnosis.

Gastric Cancer Showing Rapid Recurrence and Progression: A Case of Gastric Adenocarcinoma With Enteroblastic Differentiation

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is rare and its clinicopathological characteristics are not well documented. However, reports indicate that it exhibits more aggressive characteristics, including lymph node metastasis or liver metastasis, than a conventional gastric adenocarcinoma. Herein, we report a case of GAED with rapid recurrence and disease progression. A 55-year-old male, diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC), demonstrated initial endoscopic findings suggestive of advanced GC. He underwent curative resection since there was no evidence of lymph node or distant metastases. The disease was reported as an early GC that was confined to the submucosal layer, without evidence of lymph node metastasis in the final pathological results. However, six months after surgery, multiple hepatic metastases were found during abdominal computed tomography; the pathological results were consistent with metastasis from the GC. Immunohistochemistry of the primary carcinoma pathological specimens showed positive results for alpha-fetoprotein and sal-like protein 4, suggesting enteroblastic differentiation, which is thought to be associated with rapid recurrence and disease progression.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: Lessons from a rare case

Abstract Introduction: Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED), also known as clear cell carcinoma or fetal gut-like adenocarcinoma is a special type of adenocarcinoma characterized by primitive intestine-like structures. GAED partially overlaps with alfa-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric carcinoma (APGC). There is insufficient information on the biological behavior of GAED, which has a worse prognosis compared to conventional gastric carcinoma (GC). Case presentation: We introduce an 82-year-old man who presented 4 years ago with severe epigastralgia; the patient then underwent distal gastrectomy for a large GC. The patient was initially diagnosed with well-to-moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma with lymphatic invasion and without nodal involvement, resulting in a TNM classification of T1N0M0, stage IB. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) 31 months after the gastrectomy revealed a hepatic lesion. Lateral segmentectomy of the liver was performed for therapeutic diagnosis. Pathology specimens from the resected tissue were characterized by glycogen-rich neoplastic cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm with a focal glandular component on hematoxylin-eosin staining and periodic acid-Schiff staining. By retrospective analysis using immunohistochemical staining, Glypican 3 was partially positive and spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL-4) was strongly positive in the resected GC and metastatic hepatic carcinoma, indicating that GAED metastasized to the liver. Conclusions: Although exceedingly rare, surgeons should recognize GAED as one of the special types of GC. Treatment guidelines for GAED have not yet been established; however, pathological confirmation of GAED when encountering an APGC by immunohistochemical staining for Glypican 3 and SALL-4 is essential to recognize its malignant biological behavior unlike conventional GC.

Molecular profiling of hepatoid adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation.

394 Background: Hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAD) and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (ACED) are rare types of gastric cancer that produce alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and morphologically resemble liver or fetal gut cells. The molecular characteristics of these tumors are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the molecular profile of HAD and ACED in the comparison with common type of gastric cancer. Methods: We analyzed tissue and blood samples from 496 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer and participated in the Project HOPE (High-tech Omics-based Patient Evaluation) in our hospital, from 2014 to 2019. We excluded patients with other special types of gastric cancer, remnant gastric cancer and preoperative chemotherapy. We analyzed gene mutation, copy number, and gene expression between 10 HAD/ACED and 486 common types of gastric cancers. Results: The mutated genes with high frequency (> 20%) in HAD/ACED were TP53 (100%) CSMD3 (30%), LRP1B, FAT3, TG, APOB, CREBBP, PASK, DROSHA and STK40 (20%). The tumor mutation burden (TMB) of all the cases were less than 10. TMB of HAD/ACED was equivalent to that of common type of gastric cancer with microsatellite stable type. The copy number of 20q13.2 encoding SALL4 was significantly gained in HAD/ACED ( p = 0.03). Furthermore, 17 genes were highly expressed in these tumors, and many of these genes were associated with hepatocytes and fetal organs, including LIN28B, IGF2BP1, and HMGA2, which are related to TP53 mutation. Conclusions: Our molecular profiling revealed similarities between HAD/ACED and hepatocytes/fetal organs and high expression of LIN28B, IGF2BP1 and HMGA2, which are associated with TP53 inactivation. These results suggest that these genes may define morphological features of HAD/ACED.

Pathologically diagnosed early‐stage gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report

AbstractA 77‐year‐old male patient underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at his family doctor, and an easily hemorrhagic depressed lesion was noted near the anterior wall of the gastric antrum. A biopsy revealed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma > poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and the patient was referred to our department for further examination. A 15‐mm 0–IIc lesion is seen near the anterior wall of the gastric antrum and narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy revealed obscured glandular duct structures and corkscrew pattern vascular structures. We diagnosed the patient with early‐stage gastric cancer [L, Ant, 15mm, cType0‐IIc, cT1(M‐SM1), cN0, cM0, cStage IA] after an esopahogastroduodenoscopy examination at our hospital, and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. Histopathological images with hematoxylin and eosin staining showed tumor cells with pale cytoplasm and the immunostaining for alpha‐fetoprotein, sal‐like protein 4, and Glypican3 was positive. The patient was pathologically diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation, pT1b1 (SM, 0.4 mm), type 0–IIc, 15 mm, UL (‐), Ly0, and V0. Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation is one of the representative histological types of alpah‐fetoprotein‐producing gastric cancer. Alpha‐fetoprotein‐producing gastric cancer is infrequent, accounting for at least 3% of all gastric cancers, and is generally highly malignant. Most cases are already advanced upon diagnosis, and finding them in the early stage is rare. Therefore, pathological findings that may indicate the gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation should be noted even in early gastric cancer.

Colonic de novo Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of Intestinal-Type: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Colorectal clear cell adenocarcinomas are rare tumors. They can be divided into two types: intestinal- and Müllerian-type. Most intestinal-type clear cell adenocarcinomas show a composite morphology, and most early-stage (T1) intestinal-type clear cell adenocarcinomas have an adenoma component. We report an additional early-stage (T1) colonic clear cell adenocarcinoma that was a de novo adenocarcinoma without any adenoma component. It had a pure morphology and the smallest size (0.6 cm) ever reported. Immunohistochemical results demonstrated an intestinal phenotype (KRT20+, KRT7-, CEA+, and CDX2+). Periodic acid-schiff and alcian blue stains were both negative, which demonstrated decrease in mucin expression in the clear tumor cells. Enteroblastic differentiation was observed in a few colorectal clear cell adenocarcinomas in the literature, while it had not been observed in the present tumor. The tumor did not have deep submucosal invasion and cancer embolus, endoscopic submucosal dissection with regular follow-up was an appropriate treatment for the patient. Due to the rarity and diversity of primary colorectal clear cell adenocarcinomas, the cause of clear cytoplasm change and the impact on patient prognosis remain unknown. Accumulating evidence indicates that clear cell adenocarcinomas of intestinal-type is a histological variant of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Enteroblastic Differentiation in the Presence of Calcification: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation is a specific subtype of gastric cancer that is rare and highly malignant, usually presenting at an early stage with lymphovascular invasion, lymph node, and distant metastases, resulting in a poor prognosis. The pathology of this patient showed a classic tubular adenocarcinoma infiltrating into the mucosal layer, with the presence of cytoplasmic translucent tumor cells below the mucosal layer. It is noteworthy that this patient did not exhibit lymphovascular invasion, lymph node, and distant metastasis. Additionally, a large amount of calcification was observed; therefore, it remains unclear whether there exists any correlation between the two factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report demonstrating massive calcification in gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation, which may have implications for future diagnosis of this rare subtype of gastric cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation and gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic marker expression.

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is an aggressive carcinoma histologically characterized by a glycogen-rich clear cytoplasm and fetal gut-like structures. GAED shows the expression of at least one of the following enteroblastic markers (EMs): glypican-3 (GPC3), spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), and α-fetoprotein (AFP). Despite the absence of clear cytoplasm, we often encounter GA with EMs expression (GA with EM); however, the clinicopathological characteristics of GA with EM remain unclear. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of three EMs (AFP, GPC3, and SALL4) was examined on tissue microarray. According to the status of the clear cytoplasm of tumor cells, GAs showing IHC expression of EMs were classified as either GAED or GA with EM, and this analysis categorized 688 GAs into 94 GAEDs (13.7%), 58 GAs with EM (8.4%), and 536 conventional GAs (CGAs). Both GAED and GA with EM showed frequent lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis compared to CGA. However, a higher frequency of venous invasion, but not of lymphatic invasion, was noted for GAED in comparison to CGA. GAED and GA with EM showed similar overall survival. GAED had significantly poorer prognosis than CGA; however, not for GA with EM. Furthermore, GA showing EM expression had a worse prognosis than CGA. Interestingly, GA showing EM-positive group was more aggressive than CGA group as they had frequent venous invasion and liver metastasis despite its smaller tumor size. GAED and GA with EM can be clinically classified as aggressive tumors but pathologically they seem to be slightly different.

Clinicopathological features of rectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features, immunophenotype, and genetic alterations of rectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation. Methods: Four cases of rectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation were collected at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China (three cases) and Yantai Yeda Hospital of Shandong Province, China (one case) from January to December 2022. Their clinical features were summarized. Hematoxylin and eosin stain and immunohistochemical stain were performed, while next-generation sequencing was performed to reveal the genetic alterations of these cases. Results: All four patients were male with a median age of 65.5 years. The clinical manifestations were changes of stool characteristics, bloody stools and weight loss. All cases showed mixed morphology composed of conventional adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation. Most of the tumors consisted of glands with tubular and cribriform features. In one case, almost all tumor cells were arranged in papillary structures. The tumor cells with enteroblastic differentiation were columnar, with relatively distinct cell boundaries and characteristic abundant clear cytoplasm, forming fetal gut-like glands. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for SALL4 (4/4), Glypican-3 (3/4) and AFP (1/4, focally positive), while p53 stain showed mutated type in 2 cases. The next-generation sequencing revealed that 2 cases had TP53 gene mutation and 1 case had KRAS gene mutation. Conclusions: Rectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation is rare. It shows embryonal differentiation in morphology and immunohistochemistry, and should be distinguished from conventional colorectal adenocarcinoma.

NTRK gene alterations were enriched in hepatoid or enteroblastic differentiation type of gastric cancer

AimsCurrently, the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) with oncogenic NTRK alterations are not well known. Although NTRK fusion has been identified as prevalent in DNA mismatch repair protein deficient...

Exploring the molecular characteristics of the malignant potential of gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is a rare subset of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing carcinomas with poor prognosis. However, the molecular features associated with the malignant potential of GEAD remain partially elucidated. In this study, the relationship between clinicopathological parameters and aggressive biological behaviour was analysed in 37 patients with GAED. The results showed that GAED tended to infiltrate the deep layer of the gastric wall and possessed more frequent vascular invasion than conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA) (P < 0.001). All distant metastases were observed in the GAED group, not the CGA group (P < 0.001). High HER2 expression was found in nearly 24.32% of the informative cases, and none showed EBV-encoded RNA positivity or deficient mismatch repair. The most frequently mutated gene in GAED was p53. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunostaining revealed 13 patients with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5 (65%, 13 of 20). Thus, based on these molecular markers (immunostaining, in situ hybridisation and mutation analysis), GAED may be classified as a unique subgroup of the chromosomal instability subtype with HER2+ /EBV- /MSS/TP53+ /PD-L1+ . Next-generation sequencing analyses showed that mutations in the TOPI, ELOA and NOTCH3 genes were found only in GAED, and abnormally expressed genes in GAED were significantly enriched in hepatocellular carcinoma-, gland development-, and gastric cancer-related pathways. The HER2+ /EBV- /MSS/TP53+ /PD-L1+ profile and hepatocellular carcinoma-related pathways may be significant in the malignant potential of GAED. In addition to anti-HER2 therapy, immune check-point inhibitors may be an effective treatment option for patients with GAED.

Combined tubular adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation arising in Barrett esophagus

Adenocarcinoma (AC) with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) or enteroblastic (ENT) differentiation rarely develops in Barrett’s esophagus (BE). A 76-year-old man was diagnosed with Barrett’s AC (cT1bN0M0) and underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. A type 0-IIc + 0-Is lesion measuring 26 × 21 mm was macroscopically observed on a background of long segment BE (pT1bN0M0). The tumor comprised three different histological types of carcinoma (NEC, AC with ENT differentiation and moderately differentiated AC). NEC showed positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A and insulinoma-associated protein 1 with a Ki-67 index of 60.6%. ENT tumors were immunopositive for AFP and sal-like protein 4, and focally immunopositive for human chorionic gonadotrophin. The amounts of NEC, ENT and AC were 40%, 40% and 20%, respectively. p53 expression was positive throughout the tumor. Rb expression was negative at the NEC, but positive at the ENT and AC. CD4 and CD8 densities were lower in the NEC segment than in the AC and ENT segments, and PD-L1 expression was negative throughout the tumor. Early cancer arising in BE with a combination of tubular AC, ENT tumors and NEC is very rare. Our observations might contribute to understanding the carcinogenetic pathways and tumor microenvironment of NEC and ENT tumors.

Ureteral Metastasis of Colonic Adenocarcinoma with Enteroblastic Differentiation: A Rare Case to be Distinguished from Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Urinary Tract.

Adenocarcinomas with enteroblastic differentiation are rare clear cell tumors that are positive for enteroblastic markers. Enteroblastic differentiation is particularly uncommon in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Herein, we report a case of clear cell adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation in the sigmoid colon of a 38-year-old Japanese woman that metastasized to the lower left ureter. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent low anterior resection. The tumor consisted of tubular, cribriform, and focal micropapillary proliferation of clear cells immunopositive for spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), glypican 3, and alpha-fetoprotein. Six months after the colonic resection, a tumor was found in the left lower ureter, which was resected. The ureteral tumor revealed clear cell adenocarcinoma, which was identical to the colonic tumor proliferating in the ureteral mucosa. Metastatic ureteral tumors are rare. We performed a literature search and found only 50 reported cases of ureteral metastases from colorectal cancer. Of these, only 10 metastatic tumors were identified in the ureteral mucosa. No case of ureteral metastasis of clear cell colorectal adenocarcinoma or colorectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation has been reported. Hence, it can be challenging to distinguish them from clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract and/or clear cell urothelial carcinoma. This paper discussed the differential diagnosis of these tumors and reviewed the clinicopathological features of colorectal carcinomas metastasizing to the ureter.

A Case of Adenocarcinoma with Enteroblastic Differentiation at the Esophagogastric Junction

症例は61歳の男性で，食後のつかえ感を主訴に近医を受診し，当院へ紹介となった．食道胃接合部に1型腫瘍を認め，生検で中分化型腺癌と診断し，胃全摘術，腹部食道切除術を施行した．病理組織学的検査所見では，異型円柱上皮が乳頭状構造をとる高分化型腺癌を認め，淡明な細胞質を持ち，核異型は高度であり，免疫染色検査でAFP陽性，Glypican3陽性を示し，胎児消化管類似癌と診断した．リンパ節転移はみられなかったため，術後補助化学療法は施行せず，経過観察としていた．術後2年目の胸腹部CTで右肺転移を認めたため，右肺下葉切除術を施行した．病理組織学的検査でも，食道胃接合部癌の転移として矛盾しない所見であった．本人の希望で術後補助化学療法は行わず経過をみていたが，肺転移切除後1年10か月無再発生存を得られている．今回，我々は食道胃接合部に生じた大変まれな組織型である胎児消化管類似癌を経験したため報告する．

Rectal carcinoma with dual differentiation toward enteroblastic and neuroendocrine features arising in a patient with ulcerative colitis: a case report

BackgroundColorectal carcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation is a rare subtype of colorectal carcinomas expressing at least one characteristic immunohistochemical marker among α-fetoprotein, glypican-3, and spalt-like transcription factor 4. On the other hand, colorectal carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation is also a unique subtype of colorectal carcinomas showing expression of at least one distinctive marker among chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56.Case presentationWe experienced an extremely rare case of rectal carcinoma with dual differentiation toward enteroblastic and neuroendocrine features in a 53-year-old male patient with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC). Most of the tumor cells were positive for enteroblastic differentiation markers and approximately a half of them for neuroendocrine differentiation markers. Some tumor cells showed only enteroblastic differentiation, and some did only neuroendocrine feature, but some showed both enteroblastic and neuroendocrine differentiation.ConclusionColorectal carcinoma with dual differentiation toward enteroblastic and neuroendocrine features has not been reported yet. Neoplastic transformation from pluripotent stem cells in dysplastic epithelium of long-standing UC patients may be associated with such dual differentiation features.

Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of an α-fetoprotein-producing cervical adenocarcinoma with clear cell morphology.

Adenocarcinomas with clear cell morphology may be associated with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in various organs. We report the case of an alpha-fetoprotein-producing cervical adenocarcinoma with clear cell morphology and compare it immunohistochemically, molecularly, and virologically with cervical clear cell carcinoma, gastric-type mucinous carcinoma, and ovarian clear cell carcinoma. A 51-year-old Japanese woman was initially diagnosed with cervical clear cell carcinoma. The tumor was resistant to standard surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen and alpha-fetoprotein were elevated. The tumor was immunohistochemically positive for alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, cytokeratin 20, spalt-like transcription factor 4, glypican 3, MUC6, and HIK1083. Gene panel testing revealed CCNE1 amplification, CDKN2A loss, and TP53 R282W. We compared the present case with 120 ovarian clear cell carcinoma cases using a tissue microarray. Only one case (0.8%) showed very limited immunohistochemical positivity for alpha-fetoprotein. Of the 54 cases in which serum carcinoembryonic antigen was measured, only one (1.9%) was elevated (19.9ng/mL). We diagnosed the case as alpha-fetoprotein-producing cervical gastric-type mucinous carcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation. In conclusion, alpha-fetoprotein-producing cervical adenocarcinoma is a rare but aggressive tumor. Clinicians and pathologists should be aware of this unfamiliar tumor, its diagnostic clues, prognostic markers, and treatment strategies.

MicroRNA mediated regulation of the onset of enteroblast differentiation in the Drosophila adult intestine.

Somatic adult stem cell lineages in high-turnover tissues are under tight gene regulatory control. Like its mammalian counterpart, the Drosophila intestine precisely adjusts the rate of stem cell division with the onset of differentiation based on physiological demand. Although Notch signaling is indispensable for these decisions, the regulation of Notch activity that drives the differentiation of stem cell progenies into functional, mature cells is not well understood. Here, we report that commitment to the terminally differentiated enterocyte (EC) cell fate is under microRNA control. We show that an intestinally enriched microRNA, miR-956, fine-tunes Notch signaling activity specifically in intermediate, enteroblast (EB) progenitor cells to control EC differentiation. We further identify insensitive mRNA as a target of miR-956 that regulates EB/EC ratios by repressing Notch activity in EBs. In summary, our study highlights a post-transcriptional gene-regulatory mechanism for controlling differentiation in an adult intestinal stem cell lineage.

Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation combined with liver metastasis: report of a case

伴肠母细胞分化的胃腺癌合并绒毛膜癌成分并肝转移病例比较罕见。患者为65岁女性。胃癌根治标本，胃肿瘤呈腺管状、乳头状结构，细胞质透明，诊断为伴肠母细胞分化的胃腺癌。在淋巴结转移灶和肝转移灶中出现了绒毛膜癌成分。免疫组织化学不同程度表达SALL4、Glypican3、甲胎蛋白、人绒毛膜促性腺激素、CDX2、CD10等抗体。二代测序提示TP53突变、MYC扩增等改变。此肿瘤恶性程度高，预后差，对术前化疗不敏感。患者术后12个月死亡。.

Mucin phenotypes and clinicopathological features of colorectal adenocarcinomas: Correlation with colorectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation

BackgroundThe mucin phenotypes of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is related to the biological behavior and prognosis. But there has been no studies evaluating phenotypic characteristics in a large number of cases. Furthermore, colorectal adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (CAED) is a rare subtype of CRC and having poor prognosis. The aims of this study were to clarify the correlation between mucin phenotypes and tumor development, including biological behavior in CRC, as well as to investigate characteristic of mucin phenotypes in CAED. Methods and results974 CRC cases and 42 CAED cases of CRCs were classified five types (large-intestinal, small-intestinal, gastric, mixed, and unclassified) of mucin phenotypes by using immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed on tissue microarrays with antibodies against followings: MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and CD10. In CRCs, large-intestine type has a relatively better prognosis, small-intestinal type frequently shows venous invasions, and liver metastases, gastric type has more high-histological grades and lymphatic invasions, mixed type shows originating from the right side of the colon, larger tumor size and mucinous type, but less venous invasions and liver metastasis, whereas the unclassified type showed poorer prognosis in overall survival with statistical significance. The majority of CAED were found to be small-intestinal type or unclassified type. ConclusionsThe phenotypic classification is useful for predicting the prognosis of CRCs. Small-intestinal type and unclassified type showed dismal prognosis in CRCs. We speculate that CAED having aggressive behavior and poor prognosis might reflect characteristics of small-intestinal and unclassified types.