Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Interventions Research Articles

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish part of the international ERAS-database.

Research on anastomotic leakage (AL) in colonic procedures within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AL after colonic surgery. The study included all consecutively recorded patients operated with colonic resection surgery in the Swedish part of the international ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) between September 2009 and June 2022. The cohort was analyzed and evaluated regarding risk factors for AL. Altogether 10,632 patients were included, 10,219 were without AL and 413 (3.9%) were with AL. After adjusted analysis, male sex (4.6% AL), OR: 1.49; 95% CI (1.16-1.90), obesity (4.8% AL), OR: 1.62; 95% CI (1.18-2.24), previous surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.45; 95% CI (1.14-1.86), open surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.36; 95% CI (1.02-1.83), anastomosis between small bowel and rectum (13.1% AL), OR: 3.97; 95% CI (2.23-7.10), stapled anastomosis (5.3% AL), OR: 2.46; 95% CI (1.79-3.38), inhalation anesthesia (4.2% AL), OR: 1.80; 95% CI (1.26-2.57), and conversion to open surgery (5.5% AL), OR 1.49; 95% CI (1.02-2.19) were significant risk factors for AL. Although pre and intraoperative compliance to the ERAS-protocol was similar, excess of fluids day 0 was an independent predictor for AL. Male sex, obesity, previous surgery, open surgery, stapled anastomotic technique, anastomosis between small bowel and rectum, inhalation anesthesia, conversion to open surgery, and among ERAS interventions, excess of fluids day 0, were significant risk factors for AL.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Postoperative Lung Cancer Patients: A Novel Perioperative Strategy for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism and Improving Quality of Life.

This study aimed to assess the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) intervention in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) among postoperative lung cancer patients. Conducted from January 2022 to January 2023, the research involved 125 lung cancer patients randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 60) receiving routine care, or an ERAS group (n = 65) which received both routine care and ERAS interventions. The ERAS program comprised a comprehensive series of interventions meticulously implemented throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Thrombotic risk assessment using the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM) was conducted preoperatively and on postoperative day 5 (POD 5), with plasma D-dimer levels measured preoperatively, on POD 1, POD 3, and POD 5. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were assessed at discharge using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer Module 13 (QLQ-LC13) and The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS), respectively. The ERAS group demonstrated significantly lower Caprini RAM scores on POD 5 compared to the control group, with lower D-dimer levels on POD 3 and POD 5. The incidence of VTE was lower in the ERAS group (1.54%) compared to the control group (11.67%) during hospitalization. At discharge, the ERAS group showed improved quality of life, with higher satisfaction scores for nursing care and their hospital stay. ERAS nursing interventions effectively mitigate thrombotic risk, improve D-dimer levels, enhance postoperative quality of life, and elevate patient satisfaction among individuals undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Spine Pathways and the Role of Perioperative Checklists.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) proposes a multimodal, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. ERAS pathways have been shown to help reduce complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, pain scores, and ultimately surgical costs, while improving patient satisfaction scores and outcomes in multiple surgical subspecialties [1-6]. Numerous specialties have implemented ERAS programs across the globe, providing a foundation for spine surgeons to begin the process themselves. Over the last few years, a significant number of papers have been addressing ERAS pathways for spinal surgery [7-19]. The majority have addressed the lumbar spine [9, 20-26]. The number of cervical ERAS pathways has been limited [27-29]. Many spine programs have begun the implementation of ERAS pathways, incorporating principles and interventions to various spine surgical procedures. Although differences in implementation across programs exist, there are a few common elements that promote a successful enhanced recovery approach [11, 16, 23, 25, 30-33]. All spinal ERAS pathways have three major elements, which are preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases. Within these phases some common elements include preoperative and intraoperative surgical checklists. Intraoperative checklist in addition to the "surgical time out" has been integrated into the workflow of most hospitals doing surgeries and have become a standard of care. The surgical checklist is designed to help reduce surgical errors and prevent wrong site/patient surgeries. Several surgical checklists have been developed throughout the years. Despite these safety protocols wrong site/level and other surgical errors continue to occur. Many cases of wrong level spine surgery (WLSS) still occur even when intraoperative imaging is performed [34, 35]. One survey reported that about 50% of spine surgeons have performed at least one WLSS during their career [36, 37]. Another survey reported that 36% of spine surgeons had performed at least one WLSS that was not recognized intraoperatively [38]. On a similar account, about 30% of spine surgery fellows have experienced wrong-site surgery [39]. From raw incidence rates, WLSS may seem rare, but these surveys show that the experience of WLSS is rather common among spine surgeons. WLSS is not yet a "never event." This may be due to poor quality of the intraoperative images, hindering subsequent level identification [34, 35, 38, 40]. Errors in interpretation of the imaging may also occur, including inconsistency in numbering vertebrae, inconsistency in landmark usage for level counting, and problems with numbering vertebrae due to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) and other anatomical variants [34, 38, 41-43]. This chapter will describe a framework for the development and implementation of ERAS pathway for patients undergoing spine surgery. In addition, we will propose preoperative imaging guidelines and a comprehensive spine surgical checklist to incorporate into the perioperative phase to help reduce further surgical errors and WLSS.

Effect of continuous post-operative lidocaine infusion in an enhanced recovery program on opioid use following gynecologic oncology surgery.

To determine the effectiveness of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program, including continuous intraoperative and postoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion, on perioperative opioid use. This was a single-institution retrospective pre- post- cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing planned laparotomy for known or potential gynecologic malignancy were identified after implementation of an ERAS program and compared to a historical cohort. Opioid use was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Cohorts were compared using bivariate tests. A total of 215 patients were included in the final analysis, 101 patients received surgery before ERAS implementation and 114 received surgery after. A reduction in total opioid use was observed in ERAS patients compared with historical controls (MME 26.5 [9.6-60.8] versus 194.5 [123.8-266.8], p<0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was reduced by 25% in the ERAS cohort (median 3 days, range 2-26, versus 4 days, range 2-18; p<0.001). Within the ERAS cohort, 64.9% received IV lidocaine for the planned 48 hours, and 5.6% had the infusion discontinued early. Within the ERAS cohort, patients who received IV lidocaine infusion used less opioids compared to those who did not (median 16.9, range 5.6-55.1, versus 46.2, range 23.2-76.1; p<0.002). An ERAS program including a continuous IV lidocaine infusion as the opioid-sparing analgesic strategy was noted to be safe and effective, leading to decreased opioid consumption and LOS compared with a historic cohort. Additionally, lidocaine infusion was noted to decrease opioid consumption even among patients already receiving other ERAS interventions.

Retrospective Data Analysis for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Elderly Patients with Long-Level Lumbar Fusion

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for spinal surgery is new; specifically, an ERAS program for elderly patients is lacking. Geriatric patients have special characteristics that result in further harm by surgical stress. ERAS interventions are designed to improve recovery after surgery and can result in substantial benefits in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. We aimed to determine whether ERAS significantly improved satisfaction and outcomes in elderly patients with long-level lumbar fusion. Patients >70 years old with lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent lumbar fusion of ≥3 levels from July 2019 to June 2021 (ERAS group) and from January 2018 to June 2019 (non-ERAS group) were enrolled. Demographic, comorbidity, and surgical data were collected from electronic medical records. ERAS interventions were categorized as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. We also evaluated primary outcome, surgical complications, and length of stay (LOS). The study included 154 patients, 72 in the ERAS group and 82 case-matched patients in the non-ERAS group. Overall, ERAS pathway compliance was 91%. There were no significant differences in readmission and mortality rates at 30-day follow-up between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. Statistically significant decreases were observed in the ERAS group in complications (6 in ERAS group vs. 19 in non-ERAS group, P= 0.013) and LOS (17.74 ± 5.56 days in ERAS group vs. 22.13 ± 12.21 days in non-ERAS group, P= 0.041). Multivariable linear regression showed that implementation of ERAS (P= 0.002) was correlated with LOS. Multivariable logistic regression showed that implementation of ERAS (P= 0.004) was correlated with complications. The ERAS protocol used in elderly patients after long-level lumbar fusion surgery was safe and associated with incremental benefits regarding complications and LOS.

Attitudes towards Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) interventions in colorectal surgery: nationwide survey of Australia and New Zealand colorectal surgeons

BackgroundWhilst Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has been widely accepted in the international colorectal surgery community, there remains significant variations in ERAS programme implementations, compliance rates and best practice recommendations in international guidelines.MethodsA questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons from Australia and New Zealand after ethics approval. It evaluated specialist attitudes towards the effectiveness of specific ERAS interventions in improving short term outcomes after colorectal surgery. The data were analysed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on Stata MP, version 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).ResultsOf 300 colorectal surgeons, 95 (31.7%) participated in the survey. Of eighteen ERAS interventions, this study identified eight strategies as most effective in improving ERAS programmes alongside early oral feeding and mobilisation. These included pre-operative iron infusion for anaemic patients (IRT score = 7.82 [95% CI: 6.01–9.16]), minimally invasive surgery (IRT score = 7.77 [95% CI: 5.96–9.07]), early in-dwelling catheter removal (IRT score = 7.69 [95% CI: 5.83–9.01]), pre-operative smoking cessation (IRT score = 7.68 [95% CI: 5.49–9.18]), pre-operative counselling (IRT score = 7.44 [95% CI: 5.58–8.88]), avoiding drains in colon surgery (IRT score = 7.37 [95% CI: 5.17–8.95]), avoiding nasogastric tubes (IRT score = 7.29 [95% CI: 5.32–8.8]) and early drain removal in rectal surgery (IRT score = 5.64 [95% CI: 3.49–7.66]).ConclusionsThis survey has demonstrated the current attitudes of colorectal surgeons from Australia and New Zealand regarding ERAS interventions. Eight of the interventions assessed in this study including pre-operative iron infusion for anaemic patients, minimally invasive surgery, early in-dwelling catheter removal, pre-operative smoking cessation, pre-operative counselling, avoidance of drains in colon surgery, avoiding nasogastric tubes and early drain removal in rectal surgery should be considered an important part of colorectal ERAS programmes.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for head and neck cancer patients: Considerations and best practices.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been developed in numerous surgical specialties as a means of systematically improving patient recovery, functional outcomes, cost savings, and resource utilization. Such multidisciplinary initiatives seek to minimize variability in several aspects of perioperative patient care, helping to reduce inpatient length of hospital stay, complications, and the overall resource and financial burden of surgical care. Head and neck oncology patients stand to benefit from the implementation of comprehensive ERAS protocols, as these patients have complex medical needs that may dramatically impact multiple aspects of their recovery, including breathing, eating, nutrition, pain, speech, swallowing, and communication. Implementing ERAS protocols for head and neck cancer patients may present unique challenges, and require significant interdisciplinary coordination and collaboration. We therefore sought to provide a comprehensive guide to the planning and institution of such ERAS systems at institutions undertaking care of head and neck cancer patients. Key elements to consider in the implementation of successful ERAS protocols for this population include organizing a team consisting of frontline leaders such as nursing staff, medical specialists, and associated health professionals; designing interventions based on systematically evaluated, high‐quality literature; and instituting a clear methodology for regularly updating protocols and auditing the success or potential limitations of a given intervention. Potential obstacles to the success of ERAS interventions for head and neck cancer patients include challenges in systematically tracking progress of the protocol, as well as resource limitations in a given health system.

Association between enrollment in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal cancer surgery and long-term recurrence and survival.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to minimize the surgical inflammatory response in colorectal cancer. Our objective was to determine the association between an ERAS program for colorectal cancer surgery and oncologic recurrence and survival. A before-after intervention study was designed, including patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between November 2010 and March 2016. Cox hazard regression analysis was performed per cumulative year of follow-up to evaluate the association between ERAS program exposure and overall survival. Subgroup analysis was performed by cancer stage (low [I/II] vs. advanced [III/IV]). In total, 646 patients were included, of which 339 were pre-ERAS and 307 were ERAS. Our overall median compliance rate with ERAS interventions was 90% (interquartile range: 85%-95%). Overall survival rates were higher in the ERAS group within the first 2 years after surgery (89.2% vs. 83.2%; p = 0.04). Multivariable analysis revealed that the ERAS enrollment was associated with a significantly lower risk in 5-year oncologic recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55;95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.94; p = 0.03) and higher 3-year survival (aHR: 0.55;95% CI: 0.33-0.93; p = 0.03) among patients with advanced cancer stage compared to pre-ERAS counterparts. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer were less likely to suffer oncologic recurrence when managed during the ERAS period.

Association between compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and postoperative outcome in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing hepatic resection

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary, stress-minimizing approach that is associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, whether the level of compliance with ERAS protocols impacts the postoperative outcome of patients with primary liver cancer undergoing liver resection is unknown. The study aimed to analyze the association between compliance with ERAS protocols and liver resection outcomes.MethodsThis prospective cohort study consecutively recruited patients with primary liver cancer who were scheduled for elective liver surgery between January 2019 and December 2020 at the Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Twenty individual ERAS items were assessed in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to their degree of compliance with the ERAS interventions: an ERAS-compliant (ERAS-C) group of individuals who complied with over 75% of the ERAS components and an ERAS-noncompliant (ERAS-N) group. The primary outcomes were ERAS compliance, occurrence of major complications within 30 days postoperatively, and length of postoperative hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were 30-day readmissions, reoperations and other rehabilitation indicators. The study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (identity number ChiCTR2000040021).ResultsOverall, 436 patients were enrolled; their mean age was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47–66). Of these patients, 206 were allocated to the ERAS-C group, and the other 230 patients comprised the ERAS-N group. The overall compliance rate was 70% (IQR, 65%-80%). The ERAS-C group had higher compliance rates [80.00% (IQR, 75.00–85.00%)] than the ERAS-N group [65.00% (IQR, 65.00–70.00%)], P < 0.001). The ERAS-C group had significantly fewer major complications (7.77% vs. 15.65%, OR, 0.449, 95% CI, 0.241–0.836, P = 0.012) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5 days [IQR, 4–6] vs. 6 days [IQR, 5–7], P < 0.001) than the ERAS-N group. Subgroup analysis indicated that compliance rates greater than 80%, between 65 and 80%, and lower than 65% were associated with decreased major complication rates (6.25%, 8.48% and 22.83%, respectively) and shorter postoperative hospital stays. However, the rates of ICU stay, readmission, reoperation and mortality within 30 days after surgery were not different between groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that higher compliance with ERAS components is associated with a lower incidence of major postoperative complications and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

197. Modest cost reduction associated with initial ERAS implementation in lumbar spine fusion

197. Modest cost reduction associated with initial ERAS implementation in lumbar spine fusion

Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become increasingly implemented to reduce costs, to increase efficiency, and to optimize patient outcomes after a surgical procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the effect of ERAS after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on hospital length of stay, total procedure-related morbidity, and readmission. A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception (1946 for MEDLINE and 1974 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date) until January 15, 2020. Prospective nonrandomized cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing adult patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA with ERAS or traditional protocols were included. Articles examining outpatient, nonelective, or revision surgical procedures were excluded. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcomes included total procedure-related morbidity and readmission. Of the 1,018 references identified (1,017 identified through an electronic search and 1 identified through a manual search), 9 individual studies met inclusion criteria. Data were reported from 7,789 participants, with 2,428 receiving ERAS and 5,361 receiving traditional care. Narrative synthesis was performed instead of meta-analysis, given the presence of moderate to high risk of bias, wide variation of ERAS interventions, and inconsistent methods for assessing and reporting outcomes among included studies. Adherence to ERAS protocols consistently reduced hospital length of stay. Few studies demonstrated reduced total procedure-related morbidity, and there was no significant effect on readmission rates. ERAS likely reduced the length of stay after primary elective THA and TKA, with a more pronounced effect in selected healthier patient populations. We found minimal to no impact on perioperative morbidity or readmission. The quality of existing evidence was limited because of study heterogeneity and a significant risk of bias. Further high-quality research is needed to definitively assess the impact of ERAS on total joint arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Implementation barriers for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in rectal cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of compliance with colon cancer surgeries.

We aim to analyze differences in compliance between colon and rectal cancer surgeries under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for colorectal procedures, and to detect implementation barriers for rectal cancer surgeries. Patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgeries under ERAS were case-matched based on gender, age, and P-POSSUM with an equal number of patients who underwent colonic surgeries. Achievements of ≥ 70% of ERAS items were considered an acceptable level of compliance. A multivariate analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for lower compliance. A total of 434 patients were included over a 5-year period. After matching, there were 111 patients in each group. Overall compliance was significantly lower in the rectal surgery group (73% vs 82%, p = 0.001). A good compliance rate differed from 55% in rectal vs 77.5% in colonic procedures (p = 0.000). We identified three independent risk factors for lower compliance rates: open surgical approach, the use of epidural catheter, and the presence of postoperative ileus. Our data showed that rectal cancer surgeries are more exigent to success on ERAS interventions when compared to colonic resections. There is a need to introduce specific modifications on the protocols for colorectal surgeries when applied to these particular procedures.

The impact of variations in care and complications within a colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on length of stay.

PurposeEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, there is not a universally accepted colorectal ERAS protocol and significant variations in care exist between institutions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of variations in ERAS interventions and complications on length of stay (LOS).MethodsThis study was a single-center review of the first 200 consecutive patients recruited into our prospectively collected ERAS database. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the rate of compliance to ERAS interventions and the impact of these interventions on LOS. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact of complications (anastomotic leak, ileus, and surgical site infections) on LOS. ERAS interventions, rate of adherence, LOS, readmissions, morbidity, and mortality were recorded, and statistical analysis was performed.ResultsERAS variations and complications significantly influenced patient LOS on both univariate and multivariate analysis. ERAS interventions identified as the most important strategies in reducing LOS included laparoscopic surgery, mobilization twice daily postoperative day (POD) 0 to 1, discontinuation of intravenous fluids on POD 0 to 1, upgrading to solid diet by POD 0 to 2, removal of indwelling catheter by POD 0 to 2, avoiding nasogastric tube reinsertion and removing drains early. Both major and minor complications increased LOS. Anastomotic leak and ileus were associated with the greatest increase in LOS.ConclusionSeven high-yield ERAS interventions reduced LOS. Major and minor complications increased LOS. Reducing variations in care and complications can improve outcomes following colorectal surgery.

Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotic Agents for Selective Decontamination in Colorectal Surgery: Current Practice, Perspectives, and Trends in Australia and New Zealand, 2019-2020.

Background: There has been much debate as to the importance of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and oral antibiotic agents (OAB) prior to elective colorectal surgery over the past two decades. There is no consensus between international guidelines. Methods: The Australia and New Zealand Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics (ANZ-MBP-OAB) questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons after institutional board approval assessing specialist attitudes toward 18 enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions. Data were analyzed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on Stata MP, version 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Specialist attitudes toward the effectiveness of MBP and OAB strategies in providing better short-term outcomes was ranked alongside other ERAS interventions. This was followed by specific questions examining current practice, perspectives, and trends. Results: Ninety-five of 300 (31.7%) colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand participated in the survey. Statistical modeling was achieved in 13 ERAS interventions. Compared with other ERAS interventions, the use of MBP with OAB and MBP alone ranked nine of 13 and 10 of 13, respectively, in order of effectiveness in providing better short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery. Oral antibiotic agents alone was not considered effective. Mechanical bowel preparation with OAB was considered to be the best strategy in both colon (37%) and rectal surgery (48%) but current practice varied substantially from perspective. Mechanical bowel preparation alone was strongly favored in rectal surgery (81%) with only 14% using MBP with OAB. In colon surgery, only 10% used MBP with OAB, with MBP alone (45%) and no preparation (45%) being equally the most commonly used strategies. Conclusions: Among Australian and New Zealand colorectal surgeons, MBP with OAB was considered the best bowel preparation strategy. However, despite an awareness of its benefits, MBP with OAB has yet to be widely adopted into clinical practice or guidelines in Australia and New Zealand.

PENGARUH INTERVENSI ENCHANCE RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PADA POSTOPERATIVE TERHADAP LENGTH OF STAY: A SISTEMATIK REVIEW

Background: Health problems arising in the post-operation must be addressed immediately to speed up the recovery process and minimize surgical complications thereby reducing the length of stay in hospital. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) interventions have been introduced to perioperative to reduce hospitalization days. Objective: this study aims to determine the effect of postoperative ERAS interventions on Length of Stay (LOS). Data Source: This systematic review was carried out in several international data bases published from 2010 to 2019 on Pubmed, Proquest, Google Scholar, and Science Direct which began searching on 01 to 31 July 2019. Method: a systematic review using the PRISMA checklist, then the research questions were arranged using PICO in the search for articles so that 11 articles met the inclusion criteria and then analyzed using CASP. Results: There were 7 out of 11 articles that had reviewed ERAS protocol interventions in the postoperative phase reducing the length of stay after the intervention was given and there were differences between the treatment group and the conventional group. While 4 articles were given early mobilization interventions which were part of ERAS in the postoperative phase there were 2 articles which after given the intervention also reduced the length of stay and the remaining 2 articles there was no difference in length of stay. However, the articles that have been reviewed are not known which items in the postoperative phase ERAS protocol cause a reduction in length of stay so that they become recommendations for research by looking at the effect of each item on the postoperative phase ERAS protocol. Conclusion: ERAS intervention in the postoperative phase reduces the length of stay.&#x0D; Keywords: laparotomy, abdominal surgery, colorectal surgery, ERAS, early mobilization, length of stay.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Perspective in Elder Women.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal convention first reported for colorectal and gynecologic procedures. The main benefits have been a shorter length of stay and reduced complications, leading to improved clinical outcomes and cost savings substantially. With increase in life expectancy, recent years has shown a significant rise in advanced age population, and similarly, a rise in age-related disorders requiring surgical management. Due to pathophysiological and metabolic changes in geriatric age group with increased incidence of medical comorbidities, there is higher risk of enhanced surgical stress response with undesirable postoperative morbidity, complications, prolonged immobility, and extended convalescence. The feasibility and effectiveness of ERAS protocols have been well researched and documented among all age groups, including the geriatric high-risk population.[1] Adhering to ERAS protocols after colorectal surgery showed no significant difference in postoperative complications, hospital stay, or readmission rate among various age groups.[2] A recent report mentions the safety and benefits following ERAS guidelines with reduced length of stay in elderly patients with short-level lumbar fusion surgery.[3] The concept of prehabilitation has evolved as an integral part of ERAS to build up physiological reserve, especially in geriatric high-risk group, and to adapt better to surgical stress.[4] High levels of compliance with ERAS interventions combined with prehabilitation can be achieved when a dedicated multidisciplinary team is involved in care of these high-risk patients.

Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Improving outcomes or adding risks?

Current evidence shows that the benefits of epidural analgesia (EA) are not as impressive as believed in the past, while the risks of adverse effects and serious complications are greater than previously estimated. There are many reasons for the decreasing role of epidural technique in clinical practice (table). Indeed, EA can cause harm and hinder early mobilization in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes. Some ERAS interventions are complex, confusing, sometimes contradictory and apparently unimplementable. In spite of much hype and after almost 25 years, the originator of the concept has described the current status of ERAS as 'far from good'. Outpatient surgery setup has been a remarkable success for many major surgical procedures, and it predates ERAS and appears to be a simpler and better model for reducing postoperative morbidity and hospitalization times. Systematic reviews of comparative studies have shown that less invasive and safer but equally effective alternatives to EA are available for almost all major surgical procedures. These include: paravertebral block, peripheral nerve blocks, catheter wound infusion, periarticular local infiltration analgesia, preperitoneal catheters and transversus abdominis plane block. Increasingly, these non-EA methods are being used as surgeon-delivered regional analgesia (RA) techniques. This encouraging trend of active surgeon participation, with anaesthesiologist collaboration, will undoubtedly improve the decades-old twin problems of underused RA techniques and undertreated postoperative pain. The continued use of EA at any institution can only be justified by results from its own audits; however, regrettably only very few institutions perform such regular audits.

Effect of acupoint application therapy at different timing points on gastrointestinal function recovery and heart rate variability after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

To observe the effect of acupoint application therapy at different timing points on the gastrointestinal function recovery and heart rate variability (HRV) after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer under the instruction of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). A total of 105 patients for the selective laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer were selected and randomized into a preoperative acupoint application group (35 cases, 3 cases dropped off), a postoperative acupoint application group (35 cases, 1 case dropped out) and a control group (35 cases, 2 cases dropped off). In the control group, ERAS interventions were provided, such as health education, fluid supplementation and multi-mode analgesia. On the base of the treatment as the control group, in the preoperative acupoint application group and the postoperative acupoint application group, 3 days before operation and 6 h after operation, the acupoint application therapy was given respectively. The acupoints were Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Neiguan (PC 6) and Xiajuxu (ST 39). The acupoint application was exerted for 6 h each time, once daily till the first postoperative exhaust and defecation presented. It was to observe the time of the first postoperative exhaust, defecation and food intake, the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) 1 to 3 days after operation, the total score of gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) before and 1 week after operation, as well as the related indicators of HRV [standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) and the ratio of low-frequency power and high frequency power (LF/HF)] in the three groups successively. Besides, the adverse reactions were recorded during intervention in the three groups. Compared with the control group, the time of the first postoperative exhaust and the time of the first postoperative defecation were all earlier in the preoperative acupoint application group and the postoperative acupoint application group respectively (P<0.05), and VAS scores 1 to 3 days after operation and total GSRS scores 1 week after operation were all reduced (P<0.05); the time of first food intake was earlier after operation (P<0.05), and SDNN and LF/LF were increased 1 day and 3 days after operation in the preoperative acupoint application group (P<0.05). Compared with the postoperative acupoint application group, in the preoperative acupoint application group, the time of the first postoperative exhaust and the time of the first postoperative defecation were all earlier (P<0.05), VAS scores were reduced in 1 to 3 days after operation (P<0.05), and SDNN 1 day and 3 days after operation and LF/HF 1 day after operation were all increased (P<0.05). No adverse reaction was detected in patients of the three groups. Under the instruction of ERAS, the preoperative acupoint application effectively promotes the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, improves HRV and autonomous nerve function in the patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. The therapeutic effect of this therapy is better than the postoperative acupoint application.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Trends in Adult Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach to optimizing the postsurgical recovery process through preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions. ERAS protocols are emerging quickly within orthopedic spine surgery, yet there is a lack of consensus on optimal ERAS practices. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and discuss the trends in spine ERAS protocols and the associated outcomes. A literature search on PubMed was conducted to identify clinical studies that implemented ERAS protocols for various spine procedures in the adult population. The search included English-language literature published through December 2019. Additional sources were retrieved from the reference lists of key studies. Studies that met inclusion criteria were identified manually. Data regarding the study population, study design, spine procedures, ERAS interventions, and associated outcome metrics were extracted from each study that met inclusion criteria. Of the 106 studies identified from the literature search, 22 studies met inclusion criteria. From the ERAS protocols in these studies, common preoperative elements include patient education and modified preoperative nutrition regimens. Perioperative elements include multimodal analgesia and minimally invasive surgery. Postoperative elements include multimodal pain management and early mobilization/rehabilitation/nutrition regimens. Outcomes from ERAS implementation include significant reductions in length of stay, cost, and opioid consumption. Although these trends were observed, there remained great variability among the ERAS protocols, as well as in the reported outcomes. ERAS may improve cost-effectiveness to varying degrees for spinal procedures. Specifically, the use of multimodal analgesia may reduce overall opioid consumption. However, the benefits of ERAS likely will vary based on the specific procedure. This review contributes to the assessment of ERAS protocol implementation in the field of adult spine surgery.

Postoperative ERAS Interventions Have the Greatest Impact on Optimal Recovery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs incorporate evidence-based practices to minimize perioperative stress, gut dysfunction, and promote early recovery. However, it is unknown which components have the greatest impact. This study aims to determine which components of ERAS programs have the largest impact on recovery for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. An iERAS program was implemented in 15 academic hospitals. Data were collected prospectively. Patients were considered compliant if >75% of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative predefined interventions were adhered to. Optimal recovery was defined as discharge within 5 days of surgery with no major complications, no readmission to hospital, and no mortality. Multivariable analysis was used to model the impact of compliance and technique on optimal recovery. Overall, 2876 patients were enrolled. Colon resections were performed in 64.7% of patients and 52.9% had a laparoscopic procedure. Only 20.1% of patients were compliant with all phases of the pathway. The poorest compliance rate was for postoperative interventions (40.3%) which was independently associated with an increase in optimal recovery (RR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.81-2.47). Compliance with ERAS interventions remained associated with improved outcomes whether surgery was performed laparoscopically (RR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.96) or open (RR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.68-3.13). However, the impact of ERAS compliance was significantly greater in the open group (P < 0.001). Postoperative compliance is the most difficult to achieve but is most strongly associated with optimal recovery. Although our data support that ERAS has more effect in patients undergoing open surgery, it also showed a significant impact on patients treated with a laparoscopic approach.