Enhanced Infection Control Measures Research Articles

Risk factors for in-hospital acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in patients with severe burns

Although patients with severe burns are prone to severe infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and inevitably have some risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) acquisition, risk factors for CRE infection or colonization in these patients have not been investigated. To identify the independent risk factors for CRE acquisition in patients with severe burns. Patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit (BICU) for acute burn care were categorized based on culture results during BICU care into the CRE group and non-CRE group, which included the carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) and control groups. Clinical and microbiological factors were compared between the CRE and non-CRE groups, and between the CRE and CSE groups to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital CRE acquisition. Among the included 489 patients, 101 (20.7%) and 388 (79.3%) patients were classified in the CRE and non-CRE groups, respectively. The non-CRE group included 91 (18.6%) and 297 (60.7%) patients in the CSE and control groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis between the CRE and non-CRE groups, exposure to other CRE-acquired patients (P= 0.018), abbreviated burn severity index score ≥9 (P= 0.012), and mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001) were associated with CRE acquisition. In multivariate analysis between the CRE and CSE groups, exposure to other CRE-acquired patients was associated with CRE acquisition (P= 0.048). Considering the limitation of controlling the burn severity in hospitalized patients, enhanced infection control measures for preventing in-hospital CRE transmission among patients with severe burns should be emphasized.

Analysis of the 50 Most Impactful Publications Pertaining to COVID-19 and Orthopaedic Surgery: What Have we Learned?

Purpose There has been abundant research published regarding the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic surgical patients which have varying degrees of impact on clinical practice. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the most influential articles relating to COVID-19 and patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. Though the global pandemic is over, it is beneficial to understand how the resilience of the healthcare system adapted to guide policy development and improve patient care amidst a worldwide time of crisis. Methods The Clarivate Web of Science Core Collection was searched for ‘COVID-19 AND orthopaedic surgery’ and returned 388 articles. The most influential peer-reviewed publications were determined by citation number. Expert opinion and review articles were excluded. Article title, journal name, type of study, country of publication, and clinically relevant findings of each study were collected. Results The top-50 most influential manuscripts concluded these articles were collectively cited 1875 times. The total citations ranged from 13 to 111 citations per article with a mean of 38 (95% confidence interval [31, 44]). England (14), the United States (11), and Italy (10) had the top number of publications. The top affiliations were IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (5) and the University of London (4). The most popular journals were Bone &amp; Joint Open (10) and International Orthopaedics (10). Though the articles were largely heterogeneous, they described the necessity of orthopaedic surgeons during the pandemic as well as safety precautions to prevent COVID-19 transmission in orthopaedic patients. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis identified the 50 most influential peer-reviewed clinical publications regarding COVID-19 and orthopaedic surgery, which is a concise resource that can be used to inform patient decision-making regarding orthopaedic care and COVID-19. The top-50 articles highlighted the importance of resource utilization, increased use of telemedicine, enhanced infection control measures, patient-centered care, and the well-being of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A retrospective cohort study of the impact of COVID-19 infection control measures on surgical site infections in an academic hospital setting.

Previous studies show that both the frequency of surgeries and incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) have been lower during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study's purpose is to analyse the possible association of the COVID-19 epidemic-related increased health measures, such as protective equipment and products, increased hand hygiene and restrictions imposed, on the incidence of SSIs in an academic medical centre. We designed a single-centre, retrospective cohort study and collected data on the frequency of surgeries and the incidence of SSIs, among patients who had surgeries pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Besides the intervention and outcome variable, we sought information on patient gender, surgery type, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and type II diabetes mellitus. We used Wald 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the p values of the odds ratio (OR) to report results. Of the N = 24 098 surgeries performed in this hospital, there were 269 patients who reported post-surgical SSIs in this hospital between March 2019 and March 2021. The OR of developing a post-surgical SSI was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.33-0.57, p < 0.05; adjusted for confounders 0.39 [95% CI: 0.30-0.52, p < 0.05]) among patients who had surgery under post-pandemic infection control measures, as compared to patients who had surgery under pre-pandemic usual care infection control measures. Our significant results conclude that an association may exist between the enhanced infection control measures used during the COVID-19 pandemic and lower incidence of SSIs we observed during this period.

Emergence of highly resistant Candida auris in the United Arab Emirates: a retrospective analysis of evolving national trends.

The Centers for Disease Prevention and Control lists Candida auris, given its global emergence, multidrug resistance, high mortality, and persistent transmissions in health care settings as one of five urgent threats. As a new threat, the need for surveillance of C. auris is critical. This is particularly important for a cosmopolitan setting and global hub such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE) where continued introduction and emergence of resistant variant strains is a major concern. The United Arab Emirates has carried out a 12 years of antimicrobial resistance surveillance (2010-2021) across the country, spanning all seven Emirates. A retrospective analysis of C. auris emergence from 2018-2021 was undertaken, utilising the demographic and microbiological data collected via a unified WHONET platform for AMR surveillance. Nine hundred eight non-duplicate C. auris isolates were reported from 2018-2021. An exponential upward trend of cases was found. Most isolates were isolated from urine, blood, skin and soft tissue, and the respiratory tract. UAE nationals nationals comprised 29% (n = 186 of 632) of all patients; the remainder were from 34 other nations. Almost all isolates were from inpatient settings (89.0%, n = 809). The cases show widespread distribution across all reporting sites in the country. C. auris resistance levels remained consistently high across all classes of antifungals used. C. auris in this population remains highly resistant to azoles (fluconazole, 72.6% in 2021) and amphotericin. Echinocandin resistance has now emerged and is increasing annually. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between Candida auris and Candida spp. (non-auris) patients (p-value: 0.8179), however Candida auris patients had a higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (p-value <0.0001) and longer hospital stay (p < 0.0001) compared to Candida spp. (non-auris) patients. The increasing trend of C. auris detection and associated multidrug resistant phenotypes in the UAE is alarming. Continued C. auris circulation in hospitals requires enhanced infection control measures to prevent continued dissemination.

Surgical site infection following abdominal cancer surgery: a retrospective study in a tertiary care cancer hospital

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are significant complications following abdominal cancer surgery, resulting in patient discomfort, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs. Despite efforts to mitigate their occurrence, SSIs remain a challenge in healthcare settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, microbiological patterns, and impact of SSIs in patients undergoing open abdominal cancer surgery at a tertiary cancer hospital in Nepal. Results: A total of 206 patients were included in the study, with an SSI incidence of 35.4%. Superficial SSIs accounted for 87.7% of cases, while 12.2% were deep or organ/space infections. The study explored various risk factors, including patient demographics, wound classification, surgical type, and preoperative conditions, and although certain factors showed associations, none reached statistical significance. Notably, longer surgical duration was linked to a higher risk of SSIs. Patients with SSIs experienced significantly longer hospital stays compared to those without SSIs. The predominant pathogens isolated were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Citrobacter freundii, many of which displayed multidrug resistance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for tailored prevention strategies, prudent antibiotic use, and enhanced infection control measures in this high-risk population undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.

A51Educational effectiveness of a high-consequence infectious disease training course using ultraviolet simulation

High-consequence infectious diseases (HCID) are pathogens which spread easily between people, have high mortality rates, and lack effective treatment [1]. Examples include Ebola and Lassa fever. Most emerging pandemics, including COVID-19, are initially classified as HCID. Assessment of patients with suspected HCID infection is an advanced procedural skill requiring application of enhanced infection control measures including patient isolation, personal protective equipment, and decontamination. There is a risk of healthcare worker infection if procedures are not followed [2]. HCID often present in non-specialist centres; there is a need for an accessible, educationally effective HCID course for NHS staff. We developed a course for clinicians in infectious disease and emergency medicine, in collaboration with the Health &amp; Safety Executive and clinicians in the UK-HCID network. The course uses a blended approach; theoretical components are taught with online learning. Practical components are taught with high-fidelity, multidisciplinary simulation using VIOLET, a mannequin which coughs, vomits and sweats ultraviolet markers ( Ultraviolet tracers are used to replicate contact and airborne transmission of infectious pathogens in simulation scenarios Between 01/12/22 and 01/04/23, 57 specialized clinicians participated. All participants passed post-course competency-based practical assessments. Participants demonstrated significant gains in knowledge between pre- and post-course tests (mean score 61% vs. 83%, This is the first HCID simulation course internationally using ultraviolet markers to allow visualization of contamination. The course appears to be an effective educational intervention and improves learner confidence in PPE use. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

Neonatal Bloodstream Infection with Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Carrying blaVEB-25.

Although ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has become an important option for treating adults and children, no data or recommendations exist for neonates. We report a neonatal sepsis case due to CAZ/AVI-resistant blaKPC-2-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying blaVEB-25 and the use of a customized active surveillance program in conjunction with enhanced infection control measures. The index case was an extremely premature neonate hospitalized for 110 days that had been previously treated with multiple antibiotics. Customized molecular surveillance was implemented at hospital level and enhanced infection control measures were taken for early recognition and prevention of outbreak. Detection and identification of blaVEB-25 was performed using next-generation sequencing. This was the first case of a bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae that was resistant to CAZ/AVI without the presence of a metalo-β-lactamase in the multiplex PCR platform in a neonate. All 36 additional patients tested (12 in the same NICU and 24 from other hospital departments) carried wild-type blaVEB-1 but they did not harbor blaVEB-25. The emergence of blaVEB-25 is signal for the horizontal transfer of plasmids at hospital facilities and it is of greatest concern for maintaining a sharp vigilance for the surveillance of novel resistance mechanisms. Molecular diagnostics can guide appropriate antimicrobial therapy and the early implementation of infection control measures against antimicrobial resistance.

A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a plastics manufacturing plant

BackgroundA SARS-CoV-2 outbreak with an attack rate of 14.3% was reported at a plastics manufacturing plant in England.MethodsBetween 23rd March and 13th May 2021, the COVID-OUT team undertook a comprehensive outbreak investigation, including environmental assessment, surface sampling, molecular and serological testing, and detailed questionnaires, to identify potential SARS-CoV-2 transmission routes, and workplace- and worker-related risk factors.ResultsWhile ventilation, indicated using real-time CO2 proxy measures, was generally adequate on-site, the technical office with the highest localized attack rate (21.4%) frequently reached peaks in CO2 of 2100ppm. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in low levels (Ct ≥35) in surface samples collected across the site. High noise levels (79dB) were recorded in the main production area, and study participants reported having close work contacts (73.1%) and sharing tools (75.5%). Only 20.0% of participants reported using a surgical mask and/or FFP2/FFP3 respirator at least half the time and 71.0% expressed concerns regarding potential pay decreases and/or unemployment due to self-isolation or workplace closure.ConclusionsThe findings reinforce the importance of enhanced infection control measures in manufacturing sectors, including improved ventilation with possible consideration of CO2 monitoring, utilising air cleaning interventions in enclosed environments, and provision of good-quality face masks (i.e., surgical masks or FFP2/FFP3 respirators) especially when social distancing cannot be maintained. Further research on the impacts of job security-related concerns is warranted.

Colonization of patients hospitalized at orthopedic department of tertiary hospital in Uganda with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales

BackgroundBeta-lactamase production remains the most contributing factor to beta-lactam resistance. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) are associated with risk factors both in hospital and community settings.ObjectivesTo assess the incidence and risk factors for intestinal carriage of ESBL-PE among patients admitted to orthopedic ward of Mulago National Referral Hospital, and to analyze the acquisition of ESBL-PE during hospital stay and associated factors.MethodsWe screened 172 patients aged 18 years old and above who got admitted to the orthopedic ward of Mulago National Referral Hospital between May to July 2017. Stool samples or rectal swabs were collected at admission, every 3 days until fourteen days and screened for ESBL-PE. Data on demographic status, antibiotic use, admission and travel, length of hospital stay, hygiene practices and drinking boiled water were analyzed by logistic regression and cox regression model.ResultsAt admission, 61% of patients showed intestinal ESBL-PE carriage. Co- resistance was common but no Carbapenem resistance was detected. Of the ESBL-PE negative, 49% were colonized during hospitalization. On admission, prior antibiotic use was significantly associated with carriage, but none was associated with acquisition during hospitalization at p-value < 0.05.ConclusionCarriage of ESBL-PE on admissions and acquisition at orthopedic ward of Mulago Hospital were high, and dissemination into the community are of substantial concern. We suggested refinement of empirical treatment based on risk stratification, and enhanced infection control measures that target health care workers, patients and attendants.

SG-APSIC1080: Surveillance and control efforts for carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria at a high-burden tertiary-care healthcare facility in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Objectives: In Vietnam, although surveillance and control of multidrug-resistant organisms is a national priority, information on the burden of these pathogens remains scarce. At the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City, we assessed the proportion of carbapanemase-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CP-CRO) and evaluated an intervention package to prevent transmission of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterieacea (CP-CRE) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: All gram-negative isolates collected between November 2018 to April 2019 were tested for carbapenem resistance using the disc-diffusion method. Carbapenem-resistant bacteria, defined as meropenem resistant, were tested for phenotypic carbapenemase-production using the Becton Dickinson Phoenix CPO Detect assay. An intervention package, including placement of patients in cohorts, enhanced barrier precautions, enhanced discharge environmental cleaning, and CP-CRE rectal screening, was implemented from July 2019 through December 2020. During this period, all ICU patients were screened on admission, and negative patients were rescreened every 2 days or 7 days until discharge, death, or CRE-positive result. Admission prevalence and incidence of CP-CRE transmission was calculated among CP-CRE infected or colonized patients. Results: Among 599 gram-negative isolates collected, 108 were carbapenem-resistant isolates, of which 107 (99%) were CP-CRO by the phenotypic method. Most CP-CRO were Acinetobacter baumannii (42%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (36%). Of 1,206 patients, 433 (35.9%) were already colonized or infected with CP-CRE before admission to the ICU. The incidence rate (cases per 100 risk days) of CP-CRE colonization or infection during ICU treatment decreased from 11.5 before the intervention to 2.9 after the implementation of the intervention package. The average number of days to change from a negative to positive screening result in the intervention phase was 7.4, compared with 4.9 days during preintervention phase. Conclusions: Nearly all CROs isolated from our ICU are carbapenemase-producing CROs, with high presence on admission as well as new acquisition during an ICU stay. An intervention package containing enhanced infection control measures was effective in reducing CP-CRE transmission.

385. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic First Wave on Clostridioides difficile Infection

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea and a costly burden on the healthcare system. The COVID-19 pandemic brought enhanced infection control measures that could hypothetically decrease CDI transmission. Nonetheless, diarrhea secondary to COVID-19 and increased usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics could potentially increase testing for or frequency of CDI. We aimed to assess variations in CDI testing and frequency during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary community medical center in the Southern United States. Methods Records from adult patients were retrospectively reviewed at Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Birmingham, AL. Three groups spanning equal time periods were created based on the CDC COVID-19 rate curves for Alabama: PPG (pre-pandemic, 03/01/2020 to 05/31/2020), PG (pandemic, 06/01/2020 to 08/31/2020), and SCG (seasonal control, 06/01/2019 to 08/31/2019). We included patients ≥ 18 years old and excluded readmissions and follow-up visits. We determined the frequency, testing rates, and positivity rates for CDI in each group to assess their differences. Also, we measured the rate of coinfection between C. difficile and SARS-CoV-2. CDI cases were defined as positive toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), or positivity of either in addition to positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Differences in frequencies and rates across groups were compared with Fisher exact test. Results Overall, 7,252 hospitalized patients and 29,671 outpatients were included (Figure 1). No outpatient CDI cases were detected. Outpatient testing rates were: PPG 3 (0.05%), PG 4 (0.05%), and SCG 9 (0.06%). Among inpatients, 3,912 (53.9%) were female with a mean ± SD age of 61.2 ± 17.5 years. Overall, CDI frequency, testing rates, and positivity rates did not vary significantly among all groups (Table 1). Among those tested, the only case of C.difficile/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection corresponded to PPG. Figure 1:Patient distributionTable 1:Frequency of CDI and COVID-19 infection in inpatients Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in CDI frequency, or positivity rate between the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and seasonal control groups for inpatients. No CDI cases were detected in outpatients. This is likely due to a low testing rate in our population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Control of Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in intensive care units in Tunisia, 2022

Abstract Introduction Acinetobacter baumannii is an emerging pathogen that is increasingly resistant to antibiotics and is mainly responsible for pneumopathy in fragile patients. This germ is frequently responsible for epidemics in hospitals. We aimed to describe the steps of the investigation of an outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii affected our hospital, the measures implemented and the follow-up of the actions. Methods Following alerts issued by the microbiology department concerning 5 swabs detecting Acinetobacter of the same strain and the same antibiotic resistance profile in 3 different departments of intensive-care units (ICU), a team of the prevention and healthcare security department went onsite for an investigation in the hospital. Results We identified five cases with identical strains of multi-resistant Acinétobacter. The field visit allowed to identify some deficiencies in professional practices. All the patients were hospitalized in ICU (medical and surgical). The synoptic table showed that there was an overlap of hospitalization periods.A crisis cell was set up to validate, coordinate and implement control measures in accordance with CTINILS recommendations. Indeed, we proceeded to a technical isolation of the cases in their hospitalization sector, reinforced the basic hygiene and bio-cleaning measures and sensitized the medical and paramedical. Given that the three ICU departments shared the same medical staff during night shifts, the assumption that the germ was carried by the caregivers was the most likely hypothesis. We proceeded with a swab of the elements of the environment in the services concerned. Results showed that Acinetobacter was found on the nursing cart (visibly clean). A training about bio-cleaning and hygiene standard precautions is programmed. Conclusions Continuous surveillance, continuous hygiene trainings, combined with a rapid reaction capacity in case of identification of a new case, is essential to control the spread of nosocomial germs. Key messages • Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) is an emerging cause of intensive care unit (ICU) outbreaks. • Enhanced infection control measures limited the outbreak.

Control of Healthcare-Associated Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by Enhancement of Infection Control Measures.

Antimicrobial stewardship and infection control measures are equally important in the control of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the incidence rate of hospital-onset carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection (per 1000 patient days) in the Queen Mary Hospital, a 1700-bed, university-affiliated teaching hospital, from period 1 (1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013) to period 2 (1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019), where enhanced infection control measures, including directly observed hand hygiene before meal and medication rounds to conscious patients, and the priority use of single room isolation, were implemented during period 2. This study aimed to investigate the association between enhanced infection control measures and changes in the trend in the incidence rate of hospital-onset CRAB infection. Antimicrobial consumption (defined daily dose per 1000 patient days) was monitored. Interrupted time series, in particular segmented Poisson regression, was used. The hospital-onset CRAB infection increased by 21.3% per year [relative risk (RR): 1.213, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.162–1.266, p < 0.001], whereas the consumption of the extended spectrum betalactam-betalactamase inhibitor (BLBI) combination and cephalosporins increased by 11.2% per year (RR: 1.112, 95% CI: 1.102–1.122, p < 0.001) and 4.2% per year (RR: 1.042, 95% CI: 1.028–1.056, p < 0.001), respectively, in period 1. With enhanced infection control measures, the hospital-onset CRAB infection decreased by 9.8% per year (RR: 0.902, 95% CI: 0.854–0.953, p < 0.001), whereas the consumption of the extended spectrum BLBI combination and cephalosporins increased by 3.8% per year (RR: 1.038, 95% CI: 1.033–1.044, p < 0.001) and 7.6% per year (RR: 1.076, 95% CI: 1.056–1.097, p < 0.001), respectively, in period 2. The consumption of carbapenems increased by 8.4% per year (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.073–1.094, p < 0.001) in both period 1 and period 2. The control of healthcare-associated CRAB could be achieved by infection control measures with an emphasis on directly observed hand hygiene, despite an increasing trend of antimicrobial consumption.

Adaptations in clinical examinations of medical students in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

IntroductionClinical examinations (assessments) are integral to ensuring that medical students can treat patients safely and effectively. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional formats of clinical examinations. This prompted Medical Schools to adapt their approaches to conducting these examinations to make them suitable for delivery in the pandemic. This systematic review aims to identify the approaches that Medical Schools, internationally, adopted in adapting their clinical examinations of medical students in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThree databases and four key medical education journals were systematically searched up to 22 October 2021; a grey literature search was also undertaken. Two reviewers independently screened at title, abstract stage and full text stage against predefined eligibility criteria. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion and involvement of senior authors. Risk of bias assessment was performed using an adapted version of a pre-existing risk of bias assessment tool for medical education developments. Results were summarised in a narrative synthesis.ResultsA total of 36 studies were included, which documented the approaches of 48 Medical Schools in 17 countries. Approaches were categorised into in-person clinical examinations (22 studies) or online clinical examinations (14 studies). Authors of studies reporting in-person clinical examinations described deploying enhanced infection control measures along with modified patient participation. Authors of studies reporting online clinical examinations described using online software to create online examination circuits. All authors reported that adapted examinations were feasible, scores were comparable to previous years’ student cohorts, and participant feedback was positive. Risk of bias assessment highlighted heterogeneity in reporting of the clinical examinations.ConclusionsThis review identified two broad approaches to adapting clinical examinations in the pandemic: in-person and online. Authors reported it was feasible to conduct clinical examinations in the pandemic where medical educators are given sufficient time and resources to carefully plan and introduce suitable adaptations. However, the risk of bias assessment identified few studies with high reporting quality, which highlights the need for a common framework for reporting of medical education developments to enhance reproducibility across wider contexts. Our review provides medical educators with the opportunity to reflect on past practises and facilitate the design and planning of future examinations.

Nosocomial outbreak of δ (delta) variant SARS-CoV-2 on a liver transplant unit: A complex epidemiologic and genomic investigation

Background: In late September 2021, a cluster of patients with nosocomial COVID-19 was identified on a liver transplant unit at University of Nebraska Medical Center. Methods: The outbreak investigation included contact tracing via patient chart and employee health record reviews and serial prevalence testing for SARS-CoV-2 among potentially exposed patients and healthcare workers (HCWs). Routine admission and preprocedural screening for SARS-CoV-2 was performed, and involved patients had negative admission screening results with positive SARS-CoV-2 tests &gt;5 days from admission. Mitigation strategies involved reinforcement of patient care and visitation procedures. Whole-genome sequencing of positive SARS-CoV-2 specimens was conducted. Results: The potential outbreak cluster included 6 patients in the same quadrant of the liver transplant unit, 1 visitor, and 11 healthcare workers (Fig. 1). Moreover, 4 patients had severe liver disease, including 2 with liver transplants. All HCWs and half of the patients had received 2 doses of mRNA vaccine, albeit &gt;5 months from their second vaccination. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed patients 1–6 and HCWs 1–3 had related transmission of COVID-19. However, infections in HCWs 4–6, who worked in a transplant-related office setting without patient contact, were due to 2 separate introductions of SARS-CoV-2 unrelated to the hospital outbreak. Sequencing could not be performed on HCWs 7–11 due to low viral concentration in the original specimens or unavailable specimen. The SARS-CoV-2 δ (delta) variant (B.1.617.2) was identified in all sequenced samples. HCWs 8–10 were asymptomatic and had had contact with each other and had been involved with an intubation without proper PPE for SARS-CoV-2 on patient 6. HCW 8 had had contact with all 6 patients and HCW 9 had had contact with 5 patients. A clear index case could not be identified; however, we suspect that the index case was either visitor 1, who tested positive during patient 2’s admission, or an asymptomatic healthcare worker (HCWs 8–10). Conclusions: We identified a nosocomial outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 δ (delta) variant in a solid-organ transplant unit including patients, a visitor, and vaccinated healthcare workers with multiple introductions of the virus. Further transmission was not detected after enhanced infection control measures were introduced, including universal masking and eye protection, closing patient doors, and enforcement of visitor masking policy. We describe the difficulties tracing SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the hospital setting, even with advanced sequencing techniques. This outbreak highlights the importance of booster vaccination and strict infection control practices, especially in the setting of the δ (delta) variant.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutations during Prolonged Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts.

ABSTRACTImmunocompromised hosts with prolonged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections have been implicated in the emergence of highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 variants. Spike mutations are of particular concern because the spike protein is a key target for vaccines and therapeutics for SARS-CoV-2. Here, we report the emergence of spike mutations in two immunocompromised patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription (RT)-PCR positivity (>90 days). Whole-genome sequence analysis of samples obtained before and after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment demonstrated the development of partial therapeutic escape mutations and increased intrahost SARS-CoV-2 genome diversity over time. This case series thus adds to the accumulating evidence that immunocompromised hosts with persistent infections are important sources of SARS-CoV-2 genome diversity and, in particular, clinically important spike protein diversity.IMPORTANCE The emergence of clinically important mutations described in this report highlights the need for sustained vigilance and containment measures when managing immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19. Even as jurisdictions across the globe start lifting pandemic control measures, immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19 constitute a unique group that requires close genomic monitoring and enhanced infection control measures, to ensure early detection and containment of mutations and variants of therapeutic and public health importance.

173. Deciphering COVID-19-Associated Effects on Hospital MRSA Transmission and Social Networks

173. Deciphering COVID-19-Associated Effects on Hospital MRSA Transmission and Social Networks

S576 Gastroenterologists’ Utilization of Negative Pressure Rooms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a US National Survey

Introduction: Since gastrointestinal endoscopy can increase risk of COVID-19 transmission through aerosolization, safety practice guidelines were published. These guidelines recommended performing endoscopic procedures on COVID-19 positive patients in a negative pressure room. In the absence of such room, other enhanced infection control measures were recommended. This study seeks to describe the utilization of negative pressure rooms for endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In this IRB-approved multi-center cross-sectional study, we used a snowball sampling approach to disseminate a 42-question survey, pilot-tested for reliability and validity, to gastroenterologists across different geographic locations in the USA. Information on utilization of negative pressure rooms during endoscopies was collected. Fear during endoscopies was assessed using a 1-10 Likert scale. Data was analyzed using Pearson’s chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon rank tests. Results: 69 responses from gastroenterologists at 30 sites (61 academic, 6 community, 1 private practice, and 1 military) were analyzed. Of the 69 responses, 46 (66.7%) reported having a negative pressure room for endoscopic procedures. Gastroenterologists reported performing upper endoscopic procedures on COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients in a negative pressure environment at the following frequencies: 31 (44.9%) all the time, 5 (7.2%) most of the time, 9 (13%) sometimes, and 1 (1.4%) reported no use of the room. Similar results were found for lower endoscopies: 30 (43.5%) all the time, 5 (7.2%) most of the time, 9 (13%) sometimes, and 2 (2.9%) reported no use of the room. Although 52.2% of respondents reported risk of contracting COVID-19 as their main concern when performing endoscopic procedures on COVID-19 patients, having a negative pressure room did not significantly reduce providers’ fear compared to those without a room (P = 0.661-0.824, compared for first and subsequent procedures, before and after the COVID vaccine). Conclusion: This study shows that only 43.5%-44.9% of the institutions surveyed utilize their negative pressure room all the time for endoscopic procedures concerning COVID-19 patients. Understanding and implementing infection control measures can decrease transmission risk and may decrease gastroenterologists’ fear of infection. Future directions should investigate the standardization of infection control measures in the absence of negative pressure rooms.

Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Thailand, 2016\u20132018

BackgroundCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is a global threat. Enterobacterales develops carbapenem resistance through several mechanisms, including the production of carbapenemases. We aim to describe the prevalence of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) with and without carbapenemase production and distribution of carbapenemase-producing (CP) genes in Thailand using 2016–2018 data from a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system developed by the Thailand National Institute of Health (NIH).MethodsCRE was defined as any Enterobacterales resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem. Starting in 2016, 25 tertiary care hospitals from the five regions of Thailand submitted the first CRE isolate from each specimen type and patient admission to Thailand NIH, accompanied by a case report form with patient information. NIH performed confirmatory identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and performed multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing to detect CP-genes. Using 2016–2018 data, we calculated proportions of CP-CRE, stratified by specimen type, organism, and CP-gene using SAS 9.4.ResultsOverall, 4,296 presumed CRE isolates were submitted to Thailand NIH; 3,946 (93%) were confirmed CRE. Urine (n = 1622, 41%) and sputum (n = 1380, 35%) were the most common specimen types, while blood only accounted for 323 (8%) CRE isolates. The most common organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2660, 72%), followed by Escherichia coli (n = 799, 22%). The proportion of CP-CRE was high for all organism types (range: 85–98%). Of all CRE isolates, 2909 (80%) had one CP-gene and 629 (17%) had > 1 CP-gene. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) was the most common CP-gene, present in 2392 (65%) CRE isolates. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) genes were not detected among any isolates.ConclusionCP genes were found in a high proportion (97%) of CRE isolates from hospitals across Thailand. The prevalence of NDM and OXA-48-like genes in Thailand is consistent with pattern seen in Southeast Asia, but different from that in the United States and other regions. As carbapenemase testing is not routinely performed in Thailand, hospital staff should consider treating all patients with CRE with enhanced infection control measures; in line with CDC recommendation for enhanced infection control measures for CP-CRE because of their high propensity to spread.

Glaucoma care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

The current article reviews the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the delivery of ophthalmic, and specifically, glaucoma care. Literature from the review period includes case series demonstrating the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA in the conjunctival secretions of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The global ophthalmology community published reports outlining the enhanced infection control measures undertaken by different institutions around the world to mitigate transmission of the novel coronavirus. Telemedicine has been increasingly implemented in glaucoma practices to reduce in-office patient volume. New data regarding the efficacy and feasibility of tools for home monitoring of intraocular pressure, virtual visual field testing, and remote disc photography are reviewed. COVID-19 has posed a global public health threat due to the severity of its contagion and associated morbidity and mortality. Glaucoma specialists have responded to the pandemic with innovative modifications to reduce viral transmission and optimize patient and staff safety in the office and operating room. The role of teleglaucoma has expanded and will continue to evolve as remote diagnostic devices undergo further refinement and validation.