The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been steeped in partisan controversy since its founding in 2011. While generally championed by those on the left, many on the right have been skeptical if not hostile to the Bureau’s mission. The Bureau’s enforcement regime has unsurprisingly evolved depending on the political alignment of its Director. Under Director Richard Cordray, who served under President Barack Obama, the Bureau pursued an aggressive enforcement policy throughout the consumer finance industry. Conversely, under Acting Director Mick Mulvaney, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, such activity came to a near standstill. Many expected President Trump’s permanent nominee, Kathleen Kraninger, to continue Mulvaney’s retrenchment. Yet, after two years at the helm of the Bureau, Kraninger surprised many, primarily by launching enforcement actions at a rate not dissimilar to the Cordray era. This is the first full empirical study of Director Kraninger’s complete enforcement record. The article analyzes every Kraninger-led enforcement action by a wide variety of data points, including legal theories and remedies used. In doing so, this article will provide industry observers and practitioners, when coupled with preexisting studies on Cordray and Mulvaney, a complete record of CFPB enforcement as of January 2021. The data ultimately suggests that Kraninger’s enforcement policy was a blend of her predecessors: while she was fairly aggressive in launching enforcement actions like Cordray, the severity of penalties and remedies imposed was generally less punitive, hewing far closer to Mulvaney’s style of enforcement.