Endovascular Therapy In Patients Research Articles

Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for treating patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms.

Studies comparing different treatment methods in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms in different subgroups of onset symptoms are lacking. It is necessary to explore the safety and efficacy of open surgical treatment and endovascular therapy in patients with MCA aneurysms in a specific population. This study aimed to compare microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy regarding complication rates and outcomes in patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms. This was a retrospective cohort study in which 9656 patients with intracranial aneurysms were screened between January 2014 and July 2022. Further, 130 eligible patients were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30days of treatment, whereas secondary outcomes included postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality, and aneurysm occlusion rate. Among the 130 included patients, 45 were treated with endovascular therapy and 85 with microsurgical clipping. The primary outcome of the incidence of SAEs within 30days of treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping: 23.5%(20/85) vs endovascular: 8.9%(4/45), adjusted OR:4.05, 95% CI:1.20-13.70; P = 0.024]. The incidence of any neurological complications related to the treatment was significantly higher in the clipping group [clipping:32.9%(28/85) vs endovascular:15.6%(7/45); adjusted OR:3.49, 95%CI:1.18-10.26; P = 0.023]. Postprocedural target vessel-related stroke, disabling stroke or death, mortality rate, and complete occlusion rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. Endovascular therapy seemed to be safer in treating patients with MCA aneurysms presenting with neurological ischemic symptoms compared with microsurgical clipping, with a significantly lower incidence of SAEs within 30days of treatment and any neurological complications related to the treatment during follow-up.

Effect of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with large core: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To investigate the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular therapy (EVT) on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of large core. The studies comparing functional outcomes after EVT with and without IVT were systematically searched up to October 10th, 2023. Odds ratio (OR) was pooled using random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by study design, country or region, study date, imaging methods and time window. Thirteen studies were included, enrolling 1717 patients. The pooled rate of functional independence in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 26% (95% CI 20% - 33%), significantly higher than 18% (95% CI 15% - 20%) in those receiving EVT alone (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.13-2.12, P = 0.006; I²= 23.9%). In subgroup analysis, prior IVT increased the probability of functional independence in retrospective studies (OR 1.97, 95% 1.47-2.63, P < 0.00001; I2 = 0). Non-Asian patients benefit from IVT before EVT for functional independence (OR 2.04, 95% 1.48-2.81, P < 0.0001; I2 = 0), but Asian patients did not (OR 1.45, 95% 0.90-2.35, p = 0.13; I2 = 0). The pooled rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving IVT + EVT was 16% (95% CI 12% - 20%), inclining to be higher than 11% (95% CI 6% - 15%) in those receiving EVT alone without significant difference (OR 1.42, 0.83-2.41, P = 0.20; I²= 12%). IVT before EVT might increase the probability of functional independence in non-Asian patients with large ischemic core. The results provided clinicians with additional information on selecting eligible patients for EVT.

Endovascular therapy in patients with a large ischemic volume at presentation: An aggregate patient-level analysis

IntroductionRecently, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO) and a large ischemic core at baseline (LIC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the features influencing the clinical outcome and the benefits of mechanical thrombectomy in this subgroup. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective aggregate cohort study of patients with AIS-LVO and a LIC, assessed with quantitative core volume measures, treated with MT between 2012 and 2019. The data were queried through four registries, including patients with core volumes ≥50cc. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to determine factors independently associated with clinical outcomes in patients with successful recanalization (modified-Thrombolysis-in-Cerebral-Infarction-score, mTICI=2b-3) and unsuccessful recanalization group (mTICI=0–2a). The primary endpoint was a favorable functional outcome at day-90, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0–3, accounting for the inherent severity of AIS with baseline LIC. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (mRS 0–2) at day-90, mortality, and symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (sICH). ResultsA total of 460 patients were included (mean age 66±14.2 years; 39.6 % females). The mean baseline NIHSS was 20±5.2, and the core volume was 103.2±54.6 ml. Overall, 39.8 % (183/460) of patients achieved a favorable outcome at day-90 (mRS 0–3). Successful recanalization was significantly associated with a more frequent favorable outcome (aOR, 4.79; 95 %CI, 2.73–8.38; P<0.01) and functional independence (P<0.01). This benefit remained significant in older patients and in patients with cores above 100cc. At 90 days, 147/460 patients (32 %) were deceased, with successful recanalization significantly associated with less frequent mortality (OR, 0.34; 95 %CI, 0.22–0.53; P<0.01). The rate of sICH was 17.4 % and did not differ significantly between groups. ConclusionsIn this large, pooled-cohort study of AIS-LVO patients with infarct cores over 50cc at baseline, we demonstrated that successful recanalization was associated with a better functional outcome, lower mortality, and similar rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage for a wide spectrum of patients.

Endovascular therapy versus medical management for ischemic stroke presenting beyond 24 hours: Systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe ideal management for ischemic stroke presenting in the very late time window, or beyond 24 hours from onset, is poorly understood. It is unknown if endovascular therapy (EVT) or best medical management (MM) is associated with superior clinical outcomes. MethodsA systematic literature and comparative meta-analysis was completed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVT vs. MM for stroke presenting beyond 24 hours. Outcome measures included: 90 day functional independence (mRS 0–2), 90 day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) occurrence. A random effects model was used for quantitative synthesis. ResultsFrom the five included studies, a total of 704 patients were included with 461 treated with EVT and 243 treated with MM alone. The proportion of patients achieving functional independence was significantly higher in patients treated with EVT (34.6 %) compared to MM alone (15.9 %) (OR: 4.24; CI: 2.61–6.88, P < 0.00001; I2 =0 %). While sICH occurred more in EVT patients (6.8 %) compared to MM (2.8 %), this was not significant (OR: 1.96; CI: 0.61–6.27, P=0.26; I2 = 67 %). Lastly, 90 day morality occurred significantly less in the EVT group (24.5 %) compared to patients treated with MM (33.1 %), and with significantly lower odds (OR: 0.51; CI: 0.35–0.73, P=0.0003; I2=0 %). ConclusionsIn certain patients presenting beyond 24 hours with ischemic stroke, EVT is associated with a significantly higher odds of achieving functional independence and lower odds of mortality compared with MM. While these results do not function as proof, they do encourage further research into extending the window beyond 24 hours for EVT. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings.

Endovascular therapy in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion and patent circle of Willis

BackgroundOcclusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may extend into the middle or anterior cerebral artery (ICA-T) or be confined to the intracranial (ICA-I) or extracranial segment (ICA-E). While there...

E.5 Designing a paradigm for post endovascular therapy imaging

Background: There is no guideline for imaging post endovascular therapy (EVT). MRI is considered superior to noncontrast CT for assessment of final infarct volume and to distinguish contrast from hemorrhage. We sought to align the post EVT imaging practices with those after intravenous thrombolysis Methods: We reviewed the EMR records for all EVT patients from Jan 1, 2019 to Dec 31, 2021. We assessed quantity of CT within 24h of EVT, quantity of MRIs performed, and indications listed. We then undertook an educational program targeting stakeholders. The objective was to transition to MRI at 24h for imaging post EVT. Exceptions included neurologic change, need for antiplatelet infusion, or intraoperative complications. Results: Post intervention, a significant reduction in CT within 24h (-28%, P=0.01) and increase in MRIs (+42%, P&lt;0.00). CT within 24h per patient dropped by 50% (1.12 pre vs 0.57 post). Radiation dose per patient dropped by 49%. Average imaging costs increased by 17%, and the number of transfers off unit for imaging increased by 11%. Good functional outcome dropped from 44% preintervention to 34% postintervention (P=0.06). Conclusions: This represents the first systematic evaluation of post EVT imaging in a single center. We demonstrate successful behavior changes for post EVT imaging.

Effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy in patients with large cerebral infarctions: from ANGEL-ASPECT

Background and purposeThe benefits of thrombolytic therapy before endovascular thrombectomy in cases of acute ischaemic stroke, with a large infarction volume, remain unclear. This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness...

The Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Infrainguinal Bypass vs Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

The Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Infrainguinal Bypass vs Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

Associations of diabetes status and glucose measures with outcomes after endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an analysis of the nationwide TREAT-AIS registry.

Hyperglycemia affects the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study compares the predictive ability of diabetes status and glucose measures on EVT outcomes using nationwide registry data. The study included 1,097 AIS patients who underwent EVT from the Taiwan Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. The variables analyzed included diabetes status, admission glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), admission glucose-to-HbA1c ratio (GAR), and outcomes such as 90-day poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 2) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Multivariable analyses investigated the independent effects of diabetes status and glucose measures on outcomes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare their predictive abilities. The multivariable analysis showed that individuals with known diabetes had a higher likelihood of poor functional outcomes (odds ratios [ORs] 2.10 to 2.58) and SICH (ORs 3.28 to 4.30) compared to those without diabetes. Higher quartiles of admission glucose and GAR were associated with poor functional outcomes and SICH. Higher quartiles of HbA1c were significantly associated with poor functional outcomes. However, patients in the second HbA1c quartile (5.6-5.8%) showed a non-significant tendency toward good functional outcomes compared to those in the lowest quartile (<5.6%). The ROC analysis indicated that diabetes status and admission glucose had higher predictive abilities for poor functional outcomes, while admission glucose and GAR were better predictors for SICH. In AIS patients undergoing EVT, diabetes status, admission glucose, and GAR were associated with 90-day poor functional outcomes and SICH. Admission glucose was likely the most suitable glucose measure for predicting outcomes after EVT.

Outcomes of Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Endovascular Therapy Alone in Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Studies comparing bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with direct endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke who present late are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of bridging IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours after time last known well. We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6 from 20 centers across 10 countries in the multicenter retrospective CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) between January 2014 and May 2022. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting modeling adjusted for clinical and imaging confounders to compare functional outcomes, reperfusion success, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality between EVT patients with and without prior IVT. Of 5098 patients screened for eligibility, we included 2749 patients, of whom 549 received bridging IVT before EVT. The timing of IVT was not recorded. Witnessed stroke onset and transfer rates were higher in the bridging IVT group (25% versus 12% and 77% versus 55%, respectively, P value for both <0.0001), and time intervals between stroke onset and treatment were shorter (time last known well-start of EVT median 560 minutes [interquartile range, 432-791] versus 724 minutes [interquartile range, 544-912]; P<0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no difference in functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio for modified Rankin Scale shift, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.89-1.19]; P=0.72) or successful reperfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.81-1.75]; P=0.39). There were no safety concerns associated with bridging IVT versus direct EVT (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: adjusted odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.38-1.48]; P=0.40; mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.89-1.46]; P=0.31). Results were unchanged when the analysis was limited to patients who received IVT >6 hours after last known well. In patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke who underwent EVT 6 to 24 hours from last known well, bridging IVT was not associated with a difference in outcomes compared with direct EVT. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

ENCORE! Getting to the core of the ischemic core at the core lab

The recent results of large core trials in acute ischemic stroke prompt the most influential paradigm shift in over a decade since endovascular therapy (EVT) was proven as the mainstay of acute stroke treatment. Six randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of EVT in patients with more extensive ischemia on imaging than prior approved treatment indications revealed a consistent benefit of EVT, despite different imaging criteria and ischemic core definitions across the individual trials. These findings unfolded sequentially, akin to the acts of a drama, with the story evolving until perhaps the most conclusive results on extensive ischemia treatment about to be published. At this juncture, it is important to summarize the collective findings of these 6 RCTs, consider the potential expansion in the use of EVT, outline the penultimate or next steps during the encore of this drama and ponder the broad implications of these recent findings on the entire stroke field for many years to come. This logical rationale and perspective form the basis of Establishing Neuroimaging Criteria of Revascularization Efficacy (ENCORE), the proposed pooled, subject-level, meta-analysis of the recent large core trials, leveraging imaging re-adjudication by a collaborative, imaging core lab with documented expertise. Expansion of the treatment indications for EVT will likely ensue, yet numerous questions persist regarding other confounding variables that we normally use in routine clinical practice. Precision medicine for large core ischemic stroke mandates a more detailed investigation of the numerous clinical, imaging and angiographic variables that each trial dataset collected. In a simple pooled meta-analysis, these varying definitions, methodology and analytic approaches preclude anything beyond current summary results showing that EVT is favored, in general, over medical treatment. The epilog of the large core trials can be written by ENCORE, using the imaging and statistical methods and relevant expertise of the prior Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials (HERMES) collaboration.

Influence of inframalleolar modifier P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery vs endovascular therapy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the influence of inframalleolar (IM) P0/P1 on wound healing in bypass surgery vs endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. IM P represents target artery crossing into foot, with intact pedal arch (P0) and absent or severely diseased pedal arch (P1). The endpoints were wound healing, limb salvage (LS), and postoperative complications. ResultsWe analyzed 66 and 189 propensity score-matched pairs in the IM P0 and IM P1 cohorts, respectively. In the IM P0 cohort, the 1-year wound healing rates were 94.5% and 85.7% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .092), whereas those in the IM P1 cohort were 86.2% and 66.2% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P < .001). In the IM P0 cohort, the 2-year LS rates were 96.7% and 94.1% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .625), and those in the IM P1 cohort were 91.8% and 81.5% in the bypass surgery and EVT groups, respectively (P = .004). No significant differences were observed between the bypass surgery and EVT in terms of postoperative complication rates in either the IM P0 or P1 cohorts. ConclusionsBypass surgery facilitated better wound healing and LS than EVT in patients with IM P1. Conversely, no differences in wound healing or LS were observed between groups in patients with IM P0. Bypass surgery should be considered a better revascularization strategy than EVT in patients with tissue loss and IM P1 disease.

CTP-Defined Large Core Is a Better Predictor of Poor Outcome for Endovascular Treatment Than ASPECTS-Defined Large Core.

Recent trials confirmed the effectiveness of endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic cores. Yet the optimal neuroimaging modalities to define large core remains unclear. We tried to address this question by comparing the functional outcomes in patients receiving thrombectomy selected by either noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) or computed tomography perfusion (CTP). This study retrospectively selected patients enrolled in the International Stroke Perfusion Registry between August 2011 and April 2022. Patients with acute stroke with large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation treated with endovascular therapy were included. All received both CTP and noncontrast computed tomography. The primary outcome was defined as poor functional outcome represented by a modified Rankin Scale score of 5 to 6 at 3 months. Large cores were defined in terms of either (1) noncontrast computed tomography ASPECTS ≤5 or (2) core volume ≥70 mL on CTP. A total of 1115 patients were included in the analysis, of which 90 patients had ASPECTS ≤5 (8.1%) and 97 patients CTP core ≥70 mL (8.7%). A fair agreement between ASPECTS and CTP with a κ value of 0.31 (0.21-0.40) was found. Compared with patients with neither CTP nor ASPECTS large cores, those with only ASPECTS-defined large cores (ie, ASPECTS ≤5; n=56) did not have a higher adjusted odds of poor outcome (29%; odds ratio, 1.84 [0.91-3.73]; P=0.089). However, patients with CTP large core but not ASPECTS-defined large core (n=63) had a higher adjusted odds of poor outcome (60%; odds ratio, 3.91 [2.01-7.60]; P<0.001). In time-stratified subgroup analysis (>6 versus ≤6 hours), ASPECTS showed no discriminative difference between ≤5 and >5 in poor outcome for patients receiving endovascular therapy within 6 hours. CTP core ≥70 mL-defined large cores are more predictive of poor outcome than ASPECTS ≤5-defined core in endovascular therapy patients, particularly within 6 hours after stroke onset.

Endovascular stenting for cerebral venous sinus stenosis secondary to meningioma invasion.

Symptomatic intracranial hypertension (IH) due to venous outflow obstruction secondary to dural venous sinus (DVS) tumoral invasion affects up to 3% of intracranial meningioma patients. The literature regarding endovascular therapies of such patients is limited to a few case reports and a recent single-centre case series. We describe our single-centre experience of endovascular therapy in patients with clinically symptomatic IH secondary to DVS meningioma invasion. We performed a retrospective review of clinical and radiological data of all patients with refractory IH and meningiomas invading the DVS who were referred for possible DVS venoplasty and stenting. Seven endovascular procedures in six female patients were done. Presumed secondarily induced lateral transverse sinus stenosis was also stented in four patients as part of the primary intervention. All patients experienced complete symptomatic resolution at 6-month follow-up. Five patients had no symptom recurrence over a mean follow-up period of 3.5 years. One patient with multiple meningiomas developed recurrent IH 2 years following stenting secondary to in-stent tumour re-invasion. This was re-stented with consequent 6 months post-retreatment symptomatic relief at the time of writing. No procedure-related complications occurred. In the setting of DVS stenosis secondary to meningioma invasion, endovascular therapy is a safe and successful therapeutic option with promising mid-term results. The procedure should be considered in cases where complete surgical tumour resection is unlikely or carries a significant risk. If present, secondarily induced stenoses at the lateral ends of the transverse sinuses should also be considered for treatment.

The correlation between CT perfusion deficits and immediate post-endovascular treatment contrast extravasation on dual energy CT in acute ischemic stroke patients

PurposeAfter endovascular therapy (EVT) for ischemic stroke, post-EVT CT imaging often shows areas of contrast extravasation (CE) caused by blood brain barrier disruption (BBBD). Before EVT, CT-perfusion (CTP) can be used to estimate salvageable tissue (penumbra) and irrevocably damaged infarction (core). In this study, we aimed to correlate CTP deficits to CE, as a surrogate marker for BBBD, after EVT for ischemic stroke. MethodsIn this single center study, EVT patients between 2010 and 2020 in whom both CTP at baseline and DECT post-EVT was performed were included. The presence of core and penumbra on CTP was assessed per ASPECTS region, resulting in a CTP-ASPECTScore and a CTP-ASPECTScore+penumbra. Likewise, CE on DECT was scored per ASPECTS region, resulting in a CE-ASPECTS. Correlation was assessed using Kendall’s tau correlation and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated per ASPECTS region. Bland-Altman plots were created to visualize the agreement between the two scores. Results194 patients met our inclusion criteria. The median core and penumbra were 8 cc (IQR 1–25) and 103 cc (IQR 68–141), respectively. The median CTP-ASPECTScore, CTP-ASPECTScore+penumbra, and CE-ASPECTS were 7 (IQR 4–9), 3 (IQR 1–4), and 6 (IQR 4–9), respectively. The correlation between CTP-ASPECTScore and CE-ASPECTS was τ = 0.21, P <.001, and τ = 0.13, P =.02 between CTP-ASPECTScore+penumbra and CE-ASPECTS. Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference (CTP-ASPECTS minus CE-ASPECTS) of 0.27 (95 %CI −6.7–7.2) for CTP-ASPECTScore and −3.2 (95 %CI −9.7–3.2) for CTP-ASPECTScore+penumbra. The PPVs of the CTP-ASPECTScore and CTP-ASPECTScore+penumbra were highest for the basal ganglia. ConclusionThere is a weak although significant correlation between pre-EVT CTP-ASPECTS and post-EVT CE-ASPECTS. The weak correlation may be attributed to various imaging limitations as well as patient related factors.

Cerebral microbleeds and risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation following mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel ischemic stroke.

In patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular therapy (EVT), the association of pre-existing cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and their burden would be associated with sICH after EVT of AIS. We conducted a retrospective study combining cohorts of patients that underwent EVT between January 1st 2015 and January 1st 2020. CMB presence, burden, and other cSVD markers were assessed on a pre-treatment MRI, evaluated independently by two observers. Primary outcome was the occurrence of sICH. 445 patients with pretreatment MRI were included, of which 70 (15.7%) demonstrated CMBs on baseline MRI. sICH occurred in 36 (7.6%) of all patients. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate an association between CMB and the occurrence of sICH (7.5% in CMB+ group vs 8.6% in CMB group, p = 0.805). In multivariable models, CMBs' presence was not significantly associated with increased odds for sICH (-aOR- 1.19; 95% CI [0.43-3.27], p = 0.73). Only ASPECTs (aOR 0.71 per point increase; 95% CI [0.60-0.85], p < 0.001) and collaterals status (aOR 0.22 for adequate versus poor collaterals; 95% CI [0.06-0.93], p 0.019) were independently associated with sICH. CMB presence and burden is not associated with increased occurrence of sICH after EVT. This result incites not to exclude patients with CMBs from EVT. The risk of sICH after EVT in patients with more than10 CMBs will require further investigation. Registration-URL: http://www. gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01062698.

The safety and efficacy of intra-arterial low-dose tirofiban administration during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volume

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) administration of low- dose tirofiban during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volumes on initial brain CT. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of IA tirofiban. We identified 87 patients (16 and 71 patients in the tirofiban and no-tirofiban groups, respectively) with acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial artery occlusion who underwent endovascular therapy with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT scores (2–5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no association between IA tirofiban administration and serious postprocedural hemorrhagic complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.720; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.099–5.219; p = 0.960), any radiologic hemorrhage (aOR 0.076; 95% CI 0.003–2.323; p = 0.139), or 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.087; 95% CI 0.005–1.501; p = 0.093). However, IA tirofiban was associated with a lower 90-day mRS score (aOR, 0.197; 95% CI 0.015–1.306; p = 0.017) and change of NIHSS compared with baseline (aOR, 0.698; 95% CI 0.531–0.917; p = 0.010). IA tirofiban administration during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volumes may be effective and safe.

Unsuccessful Recanalization versus Medical Management of Patients with Large Ischemic Core : Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Randomized Trial.

The outcomes of patients with large ischemic core who fail to recanalize with endovascular therapy (EVT) compared to medical management (MM) are uncertain. The objective was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who underwent EVT in patients with large ischemic core and unsuccessful recanalization. This was apost hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial. Unsuccessful recanalization was defined as patients who underwent EVT with eTICI 0-2a. The primary endpoint was 90-day very poor outcome (mRS 5-6). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted controlling for ASPECTS, occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, and time to treatment. Of 455 patients 225 were treated with MM. Of 230 treated with EVT, 43 (19%) patients had unsuccessful recanalization. There was no difference in 90-day very poor outcomes (39.5% vs. 40%, aOR 0.93, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.47-1.85, p = 0.95), sICH (7.0% vs. 2.7%, aOR 2.81, 95% CI 0.6-13.29, p = 0.19), or mortality (30% vs. 20%, aOR 1.65, 95% CI 0.89-3.06, p = 0.11) between the unsuccessful EVT and MM groups, respectively. There were higher rates of ICH (55.8% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001), infarct core volume growth (142.7 ml vs. 90.5 ml, β = 47.77, 95% CI 20.97-74.57 ml, p < 0.001), and decompressive craniectomy (18.6% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) in the unsuccessful EVT versus MM groups. In arandomized trial of patients with large ischemic core undergoing EVT with unsuccessful recanalization, there was no difference in very poor outcomes, sICH or death versus medically managed patients. In the unsuccessful EVT group, there were higher rates of any ICH, volume of infarct core growth, and decompressive craniectomy.

Endovascular recanalization of infra-popliteal TASC C and TASC D lesions in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia: a single-center experience.

The present study aims to (1) assess the technical success and limb salvage rates of endovascular therapy in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and infra-popliteal Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C/D lesions according to the updated 2015 TASC II classification and (2) to present our institutional experience. A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients with TASC C/D CLTI who underwent endovascular treatment between 2012 and 2017. The follow-up protocol consisted of Doppler ultrasound conduction every 3 months for the first year unless patients showed symptoms of CLTI. Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up data were included in the study, and if applicable their 3-year results were evaluated in terms of primary patency, absence of amputation, amputation-free survival, and overall survival. A total of 248 patients and 287 limbs (238 TASC D lesions and 49 TASC C lesions) were treated via infra-popliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The overall technical success was 87%, the primary patency rate was 41.5% in the first year, and the freedom from amputation rates were 80.8% in 1 year and 67.7% in 3 years. In patients with infra-popliteal arterial occlusive diseases, endovascular treatment methods demonstrate a high rate of technical success and favorable outcomes in limb preservation.

Abstract 83: Early Notification Using a Novel Three-Tiered Code Stroke System Reduces Neurointerventional Team Activation Times

Background: Although Code Stroke group page systems are essential to accelerate endovascular therapy (EVT), their design and implementation has not been well-studied. We assessed a novel 3-tiered system crafted to facilitate prompt, stepped activation. Methods: An escalating 3-tiered system was designed to provide salient services with both an a) alert-be ready page, and a b) go-go-go page while minimizing false alarms. Group page levels are: 1) pre-arrival notification of possible stroke by EMS to Neurology; 2) notification of possible large vessel occlusion (LVO) by Neurology (based on cortical signs) to Neurointerventional+/Anesthesia; and 3) post-imaging notification of confirmed LVO and angiosuite decision to all services. System performance was assessed over a 1 year period September 2022 to August 2023. Results: Among 798 Code Strokes, 75 (9.4%) patients received EVT, including 45 who were EMS-arriving. Among the 45 LVO strokes treated with EVT, 26 (58%) had an early notification (EN) Level 2 page pre-imaging and 19 (42%) only a late notification (LN) Level 2 page post-imaging. Patients in the EN vs LN group were nominally older (84 vs 74), more often female (61.5% vs 47.3%), and more severely affected (NIHSS 16 vs 13). Time metrics are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. The EN group had a near 40 minute decrease in door-to-puncture (DTP) and 50 minute decrease in door-to-reperfusion (DTR) times. Conclusion: All levels of a 3-tier (pre-arrival, pre-imaging, and post-imaging) Code Stroke group page system were activated frequently in EVT patients and pre-imaging early notification of neurointerventional and anesthesia teams was associated with markedly reduced DTP and DTR times.