Endovascular Technology Research Articles

Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aorto-Iliac Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease With Chimney Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation.

Treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the infrarenal aorta poses several challenges. Traditionally, open surgery has been the preferred method of treatment in standard risk patients, although, it is burdened by high morbidity and mortality. There are many classifications to establish the patient risk for surgery. Among the most common is the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) classification. ACC/AHA high-risk patients benefit from the increase in endovascular technology and skills. The treatment modality of atherosclerotic aortic disease has shifted towards a minimally invasive approach, including kissing stents, covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) and, aorto-uniiliac stent grafts. When there is an involvement of vital branches such as the inferior mesenteric (with concomitant occluded superior mesenteric artery) or the renal arteries, Chimney- CERAB technique has been successfully utilized to overcome this challenge. We present three patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) successfully treated with the chimney- CERAB technique to preserve a large inferior mesenteric artery in the setting of occlusion/near occlusion of the other mesenteric vessels.

Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting of Superior Mesenteric Artery in Chronic Intestinal Ischemia Associated with Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure (Clinical Case Report)

INTRODUCTION: Chronic intestinal ischemic syndrome (CIIS) is a pathology associated with chronic circulatory insufficiency in the visceral branches of the abdominal aorta. Duplex ultrasound can be used as the first imaging method to identify mesenteric artery stenosis. In general clinical practice, the diagnosis of CIIS is relatively rare. Expansion of application of percutaneous endovascular angioplasty and stenting of mesenteric arteries in recent years has significantly increased the effectiveness of treating patients with atherosclerotic lesion of the visceral arteries and CIIS. AIM: To demonstrate a clinical case of use of X-ray endovascular technologies in CIIS in a patient of cardiology profile. A clinical case of a patient with CIIS and severe decompensated polymorbidity is presented. Due to severity of the condition and impossibility of full examination for this reason, the patient was not included in the waiting list for heart transplantation despite the existence of indications for it. He was admitted to hospital for urgent indications. Ultrasound data revealed stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery. Balloon angioplasty and stenting of the superior mesenteric artery were successful. After discharge, the patient’s condition was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The case demonstrates that effective treatment of even one of many comorbid diseases in a severe polymorbidity patient can improve his general condition, reduce load on the cardiovascular system and reverse edematous-ascitic syndrome.

Endovascular Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Vasospasms

Delayed cerebral vasospasm is a major complication following subarachnoid hemorrhage and a primary cause of delayed cerebral ischemia. While various preventive treatments exist, some patients still develop severe vasospasm, highlighting the need for better rescue therapies. This article explores endovascular treatment as a rescue option for vasospasm, focusing on the clinical characteristics and roles of intra-arterial vasodilator injection therapy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty(PTA). Despite a lack of strong evidence from large clinical trials, advancements in endovascular technology have positioned both intra-arterial vasodilator injection therapy and PTA as promising and safe rescue options for severe vasospasm. Careful selection of the appropriate approach is crucial for achieving optimal clinical outcomes, considering the unique characteristics, advantages, and limitations of each method. Further clinical trials are necessary to definitively confirm this hypothesis.

Disease-specific patient-reported quality of life after fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectivesFenestrated-branched endovascular technology (F/B-EVAR) is increasingly used to repair complex aortic aneurysms. While reintervention, morbidity and mortality after F/B-EVAR have been well-characterized, studies on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) after F/B-EVAR have been limited in their use of non-specific instruments and measures. We report on disease-specific QOL in patients that underwent F/B-EVAR using a validated QOL survey for aortic aneurysms. MethodsProspectively maintained databases were used to contact living patients that underwent F/B-EVAR for pararenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at two institutions. Eligible patients (n = 286) were asked to complete a disease-specific QOL survey previously validated in patients that underwent repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. An emotional impact score (EIS) from 0-100 was derived from the survey with higher scores indicating more emotional impact and worse QOL. Respondent behavior change following F/B-EVAR was evaluated in four domains (strenuous activity, travel, heavy lifting, and sexual activity) previously identified by patients to be most impacted by an aortic aneurysm. ResultsIn total, 234 patients (82%) completed surveys. Mean post-operative interval to survey completion was 3.4 ± 2.8 years. Mean EIS was 16 (range 0-91) for all patients surveyed, with higher mean EIS among those within the first year after F/B-EVAR (20 vs 14). Most respondents demonstrated limited adverse emotional impact after F/B-EVAR. However, the 4th quartile of EIS was broad (22-91), indicating that a subset of respondents had significantly worse QOL after repair. While most patients reported no post-procedure change in each of the activity domains, over 40% of patients did report decrease in strenuous activity and heavy lifting after F/B-EVAR. Those with decreased activity after repair had corresponding deficiencies in disease-specific knowledge for the domains of heavy lifting (P <.001) and sexual activity (P = .17). ConclusionsThe majority of patients who underwent F/B-EVAR in this cohort had low emotional impact on their QOL after repair. One-quarter of patients did report significant post-procedure anxiety about their aneurysm, with improvement observed beyond one year after repair. Most patients reported unchanged or decreased activity levels following F/B-EVAR, and less aneurysm-specific patient knowledge was associated with decreased activity after repair. These findings are similar to those seen in prior work using this survey instrument in patients that underwent infrarenal aneurysm repair. This work confirms the feasibility of using this survey to evaluate QOL in patients with complex aortic disease. Longitudinal evaluation in these patients may identify those at high-risk for worse QOL after F/B-EVAR.

Improved Outcomes Among Octogenarians with Ruptured Aneurysms: Endovascular Treatment as Right-of-First-Refusal in the Second Post-trial Decade

BackgroundTreatment outcomes of octogenarians with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), are often considered poor. With ongoing advancements and experience in endovascular technology, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of octogenarians treated for aSAH in the second post-ISAT/BRAT trial decade. MethodA single-center database of aSAH was reviewed to identify patients aged 80 or above undergoing aneurysm treatment. Mortality and favorable neurological outcome (defined as mRS <3) were assessed among the series and compared across several subgroups. ResultsOctogenarian patients constituted 6% of the aSAH cohort (38/619) over the reviewed period. Twenty-one percent were high grade (Hunt-Hess IV-V). Endovascular treatment was the first-line modality in 90% of patients. During a median follow-up of 17 months, the overall mortality was 39%. Higher mortality was associated with poor Hunt-Hess grade (100% for Grade-V, 47% for III-IV, 13% for I-II, P=0.004) and non-independent baseline function status (100% mortality for non-independent vs. 28% for independent group, P=0.002). At last follow-up, 53% of patients achieved a favorable neurological outcome. The stratified rate was 80% in Hunt-Hess grade I-II and over 60% in patients with premorbid independent function status or less than 5 frailty components (P≤0.02 vs. poorer counterparts). ConclusionNeurological outcomes of octogenarian patients with aSAH are improving in the second post-trial decade, particularly given the preponderance of endovascular treatment. Baseline functional status and comorbidities of octogenarians should be considered in addition to the Hunt-Hess grade in prognostication.

A national census for the off-label treatment of complex aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveDespite regulatory challenges, device availability, and rapidly expanding techniques, off-label endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs) has expanded in the past decade. Given the lack of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved endovascular technology to treat cAAs, we performed a national census to better understand volume and current practice patterns in the United States. MethodsTargeted sampling identified vascular surgeons with experience in off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. An electronic survey was distributed with institutional review board approval from the University of Rochester to 261 individuals with a response rate of 38% (n = 98). ResultsA total of 93 respondents (95%) reported off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. Mean age was 45.7 ± 8.3 years, and 84% were male. Most respondents (59%) were within the first 10 years of practice, and 69% trained at institutions with a high-volume of off-label endovascular procedures for complex aortic aneurysms with or without a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (PS-IDE). Twelve respondents from 11 institutions reported institutional PS-IDEs for physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), in-situ laser fenestration (ISLF), or parallel grafting technique (PGT), including sites with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. Eighty-nine unique institutions reported elective off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 20.2 ± 16.5 cases/year and ∼1757 total cases/year nationally. Eighty reported urgent/emergent off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 5.7 ± 5.4 cases/year and ∼499 total cases/year nationally. There was no correlation between high-volume endovascular institutions (>15 cases/year) and institutions with high volumes of open surgical repair for cAAs (>15 cases/year; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.5; P = .34). Elective techniques included PMEG (70%), ISLF (30%), hybrid PMEG/ISLF (18%), and PGT (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 63% of respondents. Techniques for emergent endovascular treatment of complex aortic disease included PMEG (52%), ISLF (40%), PGT (20%), and hybrid-PMEG/ISLF (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 41% of respondents. Thirty-nine percent of respondents always or frequently offer referrals to institutions with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. The most common barrier for referral to PS-IDE centers included geographic distance (48%), longitudinal relationship with patient (45%), and costs associated with travel (33%). Only 61% of respondents participate in the Vascular Quality Initiative for complex endovascular aneurysm repair, and only 57% maintain a prospective institutional database. Eighty-six percent reported interest in a national collaborative database for off-label endovascular repair of cAA. ConclusionsEstimates of off-label endovascular repair of cAAs are likely underrepresented in the literature based on this national census. PMEG was the most common technique for elective and emergent procedures. Under-reported off-label endovascular repair of cAA outcomes data appears to be limited by non-standardized PS-IDE reporting to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the lack of Vascular Quality Initiative participation and prospective institutional data collection. Most participants are interested in a national collaborative database for endovascular repair of cAAs.

Open Microsurgical Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment After Failed Endovascular Therapy: An Evaluation of Aneurysm Treatment Frequencies in All Neurovascular Centers Across Austria and the Czech Republic Over 20 Years.

Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms has tremendously advanced over the past decades. Nevertheless, aneurysm residual and recurrence remain challenges after embolization. The objective of this study was to elucidate the portion of embolized aneurysms requiring open surgery and evaluate whether newer endovascular treatments have changed the need for open surgery after failed embolization. All 15 cerebrovascular centers in Austria and the Czech Republic provided overall aneurysm treatment frequency data and retrospectively reviewed consecutive cerebral aneurysms treated with open surgical treatment after failure of embolization from 2000 to 2022. All endovascular modalities were included. On average, 1362 aneurysms were treated annually in the 2 countries. The incidence increased from 0.006% in 2005 to 0.008% in 2020 in the overall population. Open surgery after failed endovascular intervention was necessary in 128 aneurysms (0.8%), a proportion that remained constant over time. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was the initial presentation in 70.3% of aneurysms. The most common location was the anterior communicating artery region (40.6%), followed by the middle cerebral artery (25.0%). The median diameter was 6 mm (2-32). Initial endovascular treatment included coiling (107 aneurysms), balloon-assist (10), stent-assist (4), intrasaccular device (3), flow diversion (2), and others (2). Complete occlusion after initial embolization was recorded in 40.6%. Seventy-one percent of aneurysms were operated within 3 years after embolization. In 7%, the indication for surgery was (re-)rupture and, in 88.3%, reperfusion. Device removal was performed in 16.4%. Symptomatic intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 10.2%. Complete aneurysm occlusion after open surgery was achieved in 94%. Open surgery remains a rare indication for cerebral aneurysms after failed endovascular embolization even in the age of novel endovascular technology, such as flow diverters and intrasaccular devices. Regardless, it is mostly performed for ruptured aneurysms initially treated with primary coiling that are in the anterior circulation.

Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options.

The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.

Diagnosis and X-ray endovascular methods of treatment of arterial priapism in children

Diagnosis and X-ray endovascular methods of treatment of arterial priapism in children

Endovascular Applications for the Management of High-Grade Gliomas in the Modern Era.

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) have a poor prognosis and are difficult to treat. This review examines the evolving landscape of endovascular therapies for HGGs. Recent advances in endovascular catheter technology and delivery methods allow for super-selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion (SSIACI) with increasing precision. This treatment modality may offer the ability to deliver anti-tumoral therapies directly to tumor regions while minimizing systemic toxicity. However, challenges persist, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, hemodynamic complexities, and drug-tumor residence time. Innovative adjunct techniques, such as focused ultrasound (FUS) and hyperosmotic disruption, may facilitate BBB disruption and enhance drug penetration. However, hemodynamic factors that limit drug residence time remain a limitation. Expanding therapeutic options beyond chemotherapy, including radiotherapy and immunobiologics, may motivate future investigations. While preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate moderate efficacy, larger randomized trials are needed to validate the clinical benefits. Additionally, future directions may involve endovascular sampling for peri-tumoral surveillance; changes in drug formulations to prolong residence time; and the exploration of non-pharmaceutical therapies, like radioembolization and photodynamic therapy. Endovascular strategies hold immense potential in reshaping HGG treatment paradigms, offering targeted and minimally invasive approaches. However, overcoming technical challenges and validating clinical efficacy remain paramount for translating these advancements into clinical care.

Comprehensive management of challenging recurrent aortoiliac and lower extremity occlusive disease with simultaneous modified-covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation, inferior mesenteric artery snorkel, and lower extremity bypass.

Despite recent advancements in endovascular technology and proven durability of open surgeries, managing extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with concurrent severe lower extremity (LE) arterial occlusion remains a formidable challenge. This paper introduces a comprehensive approach to addressing recurrent AIOD and LE occlusive diseases by employing modified-CERAB, inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) snorkel, and LE bypass in a challenging case. A 56-year-old male patient presented with subacute bilateral lower extremity rest pain with dry gangrene in the left great toe and a complex medical history. His history included a hostile abdomen stemming from past ischemic bowel episodes and multiple bowel resections through laparotomies. Furthermore, the patient had a persistent left ventricular thrombus (LVT), stage-2 chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and was currently experiencing bilateral LE rest pain and dry gangrene in the left great toe, accompanied by severe dermatitis in both LEs. He successfully underwent modified-CERAB with a concurrent snorkel technique for IMA preservation, along with an LE bypass to resolve bilateral LE critical ischemia. This comprehensive management approach, combining simultaneous modified-CERAB, IMA snorkel, and LE bypass, provides an effective alternative for addressing complex AIOD and LE occlusive disease patients with hostile abdomen.

Atherectomy – The Options, the Evidence, and When Should It Be Used

The use of atherectomy for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) has increased exponentially and reached 18% of all PVI in the United States. The theoretical benefit on extensive arterial calcification relies on the concept of plaque modification and removal instead of displacement, as with other endovascular techniques. To date, there are no prospective studies comparing the different atherectomy technologies (directional, rotational, orbital, and laser). Moreover, most related prospective comparative studies have a small number of patients, and larger studies are single arm in patients with relatively mild to moderate disease burden. While available literature shows lower dissection risk and reduced bailout stenting, the superiority of this technology compared to other endovascular techniques has yet to be proven. Despite the lack of level 1 evidence to support its superiority, the lucrative reimbursement fueled the overuse of this technology as first-line therapy, particularly in office-based laboratories and ambulatory surgery centers. The use of atherectomy ought to be selective and complementary to other endovascular technologies, and individualized patient-level decision-making based on the practitioner’s preference and expertise is essential to selectively incorporate atherectomy in managing complex atherosclerotic lesions.

Presentation and management of true aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal arcade with concomitant celiac artery stenosis using the endovascular approach

True aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDA) arcade are rare but require intervention due to the high risk of rupture. Historically, these aneurysms have been managed with open surgical methods. In this study, we describe a contemporary series of aneurysms treated using a modern approach that includes endovascular and hybrid techniques. All the patients with aneurysms of the PDA arcade in an institutional database were identified between 2008 and 2022. Patients with history of pancreatic resection were excluded. Data on demographics, presenting symptoms, imaging findings, operative approach, and outcomes were collected and reviewed. There were nine patients diagnosed with a PDA aneurysm, and all nine underwent endovascular intervention. Most were men (n = 5; 55.6%) and White (n = 7; 77.8%) and had American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. The median aneurysm size was 21 mm (range, 6-42 mm), and five (55.5%) were symptomatic. Of the five symptomatic cases, two presented with rupture and were treated urgently. The median time to intervention for the nonurgent cases was 30 days. All but one patient had concomitant celiac artery stenosis and two of the eight cases (25%) were due to extrinsic compression from median arcuate ligament syndrome. Both patients underwent median arcuate ligament syndrome release before endovascular intervention. Another patient required open surgical bypass before endovascular repair from the supraceliac aorta to hepatic artery using a Dacron graft to maintain hepatic perfusion. Among the eight patients with celiac axis stenosis, five (62.5%) required celiac stent placement within the same operation. Coil embolization of the aneurysm was used for all except for two patients (n = 7 of 9; 77.8%), with one patient receiving embolic plugs and another receiving an 8 × 38-mm balloon-expandable covered stent for aneurysm exclusion. The median operating room time was 134 minutes. All repairs were technically successful without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 30 months. There was no morbidity, mortality, or unplanned secondary reinterventions within 6 months after aneurysm repair. Stent patency and aneurysm size remained stable at 2 years of follow-up. True pancreaticoduodenal artery arcade aneurysms can be safely and effectively treated using endovascular and hybrid techniques. Because many of these aneurysms have concomitant celiac artery stenosis, the use of endovascular technology allows for simultaneous treatment of both the aneurysm and the stenosis with exceptional results.

TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: FROM IDEA TO IMPLEMENTATION

HighlightsTranscatheter aortic valve replacement is an innovative trend in modern cardiovascular surgery. This minimally invasive image-guided endovascular technology is becoming more and more safe, nowadays it can involve a minimalistic approach in which the aortic valve replacement is performed without incisions, anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass - patients are conscious and spontaneously breathing. The article describes a paradigm shift in modern cardiology, in which the concept of treating patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis has changed over the 20 years of existence of the transcatheter replacement, starting as a method used only in small number of extremely high-risk patients unsuitable for cardiac surgery and now being the most prevalent treatment modality in patients at intermediate and even low surgical risk. The main clinical and technical principles of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, as well as the prospects for the development of this technique, are highlighted. Abstract Transcatheter aortic valve replacement technique was first implemented about 20 years ago, in April 2002. A quarter of a century ago, specialists involved in image-guided surgery would have never believed that they would perform transcatheter interventions on heart valves. Transcatheter interventions are an alternative to open-heart surgery for acquired heart disease. Transcatheter heart valve replacement or repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement, which do not require incisions, cardiopulmonary bypass, and in some cases general anesthesia, to this day continue to be perceived as revolutionary and breakthrough, saving the lives of many patients. The article presents the main milestones in the development of image-guided endovascular surgery and transcatheter aortic valve replacement technique, the number of which in the United States and several European countries increases by 10–15% annually, reaching hundreds of thousands per year. The etiology and pathophysiology of aortic stenosis, the technique of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the outcome of this promising minimally invasive procedure are presented.

Early outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (F/B-EVAR); A single-center experience

Background: Open surgical repair of juxta-, para- and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) has been the gold-standard for patients fit for surgery. However, endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms using devices implementing directional branches or fenestrations for incorporation of reno-visceral target vessels (TV) has gained widespread attention, due to its lower mortality and complication rate and its more attractive profile for high-risk patients. Nonetheless, complex endovascular technologies require meticulous abidance to protocols for successful application. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single, tertiary center was undertaken, including all patients undergoing complex aortic endovascular repair with fenestrated (F-EVAR) of branched devices (B-EVAR) from a 5-year time period (2018-2023). Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes included primary TV patency, acute kidney injury (AKI), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke rates. Results: Of 74 patients (mean age: 69 ± 5.6 years-old, 98% males), 31 (42.6) and 43 (57.6%) were treated by F-EVAR and B-EVAR, respectively. Mean aneurysm diameter was 68 ± 1.8cm, with 15 (20.5%) juxtarenal AAA, 27 (35.6%) pararenal AAA, 16 (21.9%) type IV TAAA, 6 (8.2%) type III TAAA, and 10 (13.7%) type II TAAA treated. Sixteen (21.6%) patients were treated due to failed-EVAR. In total, 272 TV were successfully revascularized. Thirty-day mortality was 8.1%. Primary TV patency rate was 99.2% (270/272). Endoleak rate was 8.1% (6/74). No cases of AKI or MI were observed. One (1.3%) case of hemorrhagic stroke was observed. Three cases (4%) of SCI were observed, including one temporary paraparesis and two permanent paraplegia cases. Reintervention rate was 5.4%, including two cases of renal artery stent thrombosis revascularization procedures. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms is feasible, with good perioperative outcomes. Adherence to precise protocols covering every technical aspect of patient care is warranted for satisfactory outcomes.

Adoption and clinical outcomes of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in a regional, multistate community hospital system

ObjectiveComplex endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair techniques have evolved over the last decade, yet patterns of physician and hospital system adoption of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) remain poorly defined. We investigated clinical outcomes, use trends, and surgeon and hospital experience for FEVAR in a large community hospital system. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all FEVAR procedures within our 5-state hospital system between April 2012 and June 2021. AAA repair volumes (open, EVAR, and FEVAR) were captured at the hospital and surgeon levels using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes. Clinical and outcomes data were collected for FEVAR patients. To consider if surgeon or hospital experience influenced outcomes, sequential case number was used to divide patients into surgeon experience and hospital experience groups. Inverse probability weighted and generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, were built to examine risk-adjusted outcomes for surgeon and hospital experience groups. ResultsOf 3850 patients treated with AAA procedures of any kind between 2012 and 2021, 160 (4.2%) underwent FEVAR. FEVAR procedures were performed by 34 different surgeons at 12 hospitals, with intraoperative complications and unplanned adjunctive procedures occurring in 18.8% (n = 30) and 19.4% (n = 31) of patients, respectively. Among FEVAR patients, in-hospital mortality was 1.3% (n = 2) and postoperative morbidity was 16.9% (n = 27). Renal function decline occurred postoperatively in 5.1% of patients. Early (<30 day) postoperative endoleaks occurred in 15.3% of patients (n = 21). Target vessel patency was 95.6% on initial postoperative imaging. Surgeon and hospital experience had a small positive impact on outcomes after the first one to three cases. Significant decreases in operative time, fluoroscopy time, and estimated blood loss were observed with increased surgeon experience, relative to a surgeon's first case (P < .05). There were lower odds of intraoperative complications after a surgeon's first case (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.77, for cases 2-3) or after a hospital's first one to three cases (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.89, for cases 4-8; OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.55 for cases 9-49). ConclusionsClinical outcomes of FEVAR across our hospital system compare favorably with previously published reports. Although system-wide FEVAR adoption increased 3-fold over the last decade, FEVAR continued to be performed by a minority of hospitals in our system. The results from this cohort demonstrate low rates of adverse events, high rates of technical efficiency, and a small impact of surgeon and hospital experience, thereby supporting this advanced endovascular technology as a safe, efficacious, and generalizable treatment alternative to open repair for patients with complex aortic anatomy.

Impact of the endovascular revolution on vascular training through analysis of national data case reports

BackgroundIn the last couple of decades, there has been a shift in use of endovascular procedures in vascular surgery. We aim to examine the impact of this endovascular shift on vascular trainees, determine whether the surgical experiences of trainees in the integrated residency and fellowship program changed over time, and identify differences between the two training paradigms. MethodsData were extracted from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education National Data Case Logs for the vascular surgery fellowship (1999-2021) and integrated residency (2012-2021) programs. Every procedure was categorized as open or endovascular, then designated into the following subcategories: thoracic aneurysm repairs, cerebrovascular, abdominal aneurysm repairs, venous, vascular access, peripheral arterial disease, visceral, or miscellaneous. We compared the prevalence of open and endovascular cases in the fellowship and integrated residency using data from overlapping years (2012-2021). In addition, we compared the mean number of cases per trainee per year within designated time intervals. The vascular surgery fellowship was grouped into three intervals: 1999 to 2006, 2006 to 2013, and 2013 to 2021; the integrated vascular surgery residency was grouped into two intervals: 2012 to 2017 and 2017 to 2021. Data were standardized to represent the average number of cases per trainee per year. ResultsWithin the fellowship, we found a 362.37% increase in endovascular procedures (mean, 56.80 ± 32.57 vs 262.63 ± 9.91; P < .001), although there was only a 32.47% increase in open procedures (220.19 ± 4.55 vs 291.68 ± 8.20) between the first and last time intervals. There was a decrease in abdominal aneurysm repair (24.46 ± 7.30 vs 13.85 ± 0.58; P < .001) and visceral (6.41 ± 0.44 vs 5.80 ± 0.42; P = .039) open procedures. For the integrated residency, there was an increase in open procedures by 8.52% (352.18 ± 8.23 vs 382.20 ± 5.84; P < .001). Residents had greater total, open, and endovascular procedures per year than fellows (all P < .001). Chief residents had approximately one-half as many cases as vascular fellows per year. Fellows performed more open abdominal aneurysm repair (14.04 ± 0.80 vs 12.40 ± 1.32; P = .007) and visceral (5.83 ± 0.41 vs 4.88 ± 0.46; P > .001) procedures than residents. Overall, 52% to 53% of cases performed by trainees per year were open procedures in both the fellowship and integrated residency (288.56 ± 12.10 vs 261.27 ± 10.13, 365.52 ± 17.23 vs 319.58 ± 6.62; both P < .001). Within the subcategories, only cerebrovascular, vascular access, and miscellaneous had more open procedures performed per trainee. ConclusionsVascular surgery training has incorporated new endovascular techniques and technologies while maintaining operative training in open procedures. Despite changes in vascular surgery training, trainees are still performing more open procedures than endovascular procedures per year. However, there are evolving deficits in specific types of procedures.

Open Surgical Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease.

The surgical management of symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) has changed in the last few decades. Improvement in endovascular technology has resulted in more complex lesion once reserved for open surgery being addressed in an endovascular fashion. Even with these advances, there are lesions and patients that are better managed with an open surgical procedure. The aim of this review is to describe the most commonly performed open surgical procedures for PAD. The recently published Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy (BEST-CLI) trial was an international, prospective, randomized controlled trial that aimed to investigate which revascularization (endovascular vs. surgical bypass) approach was superior for limb salvage. The evidence supports an open surgical bypass as an initial approach. The advancements made in the surgical management of PAD have provided options for patients who were once deemed poor surgical candidates. The goal continues to be utilization of the best available tools to address patient disease. In this current era, it is important to be familiar with the open surgical therapies.

The Promise of Endovascular Neurotechnology: A Brain-Computer Interface to Restore Autonomy to People With Motor Impairment.

This Joel A. DeLisa Lecture on endovascular brain-computer interfaces was presented by Dr Thomas Oxley on February 23, 2023, at the Association of Academic Physiatrists Annual Scientific Meeting. The lecture described how brain-computer interfaces replace lost physiological function to enable direct communication between the brain and external digital devices, such as computers, smartphones, and robotic limbs. Specifically, the potential of a novel endovascular brain-computer interface technology was discussed. The brain-computer interface uses a stent-electrode array delivered via the jugular vein and is permanently implanted in a vein adjacent to the motor cortex. In a first-in-human clinical trial, participants with upper limb paralysis who received the endovascular brain-computer interface could use the system independently and at home to operate laptop computers for various instrumental activities of daily living. A Food and Drug Administration-approved trial of the endovascular brain-computer interface in the United States is in progress. Future development of the system will provide recipients with continuous autonomy through digital access with minimal caregiver assistance. Physiatrists and occupational therapists will have a vital role in helping people with paralysis achieve the potential of implantable brain-computer interfaces.

Incidence and management of traumatic vertebral artery injuries: wartime experience in Ukraine.

Modern combat-related vertebral artery (VA) injuries are increasingly being diagnosed, but the management of such injuries remains controversial. The authors report the frequency and characteristics of combat-related penetrating VA injuries and the indications for endovascular treatment, as well as analyze their treatment outcomes. A 1-year prospective study was completed at a civilian medical center in Dnipro, Ukraine, in all patients with VA injuries sustained during the Russian invasion in the 1st year of war. The authors evaluated the location, type, and severity of the VA injuries and concomitant injuries, as well as the type of intervention and outcomes at 1 month. In total, 279 wounded patients underwent cerebral angiography and 30 (10.8%) patients had VA injuries. All patients were male. There were 28 soldiers and 2 civilians with a mean age of 37.5 years. Four (13.3%) patients had Bissl grade I injuries, 4 (13.3%) had grade II injuries, 4 (13.3%) had grade III injuries (pseudoaneurysm), and 18 (60.0%) had grade IV injuries (occlusion). Four (13.3%) patients underwent emergency open surgical intervention. Fourteen (46.7%) patients underwent endovascular intervention. There was a significant relationship between the anatomical level of the VA injury and surgical intervention (p < 0.05). Endovascular intervention was correlated with the severity of vascular injury to the VA, with 12.5% of the patients receiving intervention for grade I and II lesions and 59.1% receiving intervention for grade III and IV lesions (p < 0.05). The overall mortality in the study group was 6.7% (n = 2), and both died of ischemic complications. In modern armed conflicts, VA injuries are much more common than reported for previous wars. With the available modern endovascular technology, cerebral angiography is warranted for suspected VA injury and allows for both the diagnosis and treatment of these injuries. Whether endovascular intervention is performed depends on the level and severity of VA injury, severity of concomitant injuries, and presence of collateral circulation.