Endovascular Expertise Research Articles

Hybrid management of aberrant subclavian artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To elucidate the short- and long-term mortality, morbidity, and endoleak incidences in the hybrid management of aberrant subclavian artery (ASA). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 99 articles comprising n = 272 cases using PRISMA were supplemented by Cohen's Kappa for assessor consistency. The analysis involved a random-effect model, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals, tests of heterogeneity, and probability. This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405011). The 30-day mortality was 4.6% (95% CI: 1.4%-14.4%) with an overall mortality of 7.3% (95% CI: 2.9%-18.7%) demonstrating a 1.2% increase in mortality per decade of life beyond 60 years. The reported morbidity was 7.6% (95% CI: 3.7%-15.7%) and higher in males albeit higher age (p < .05) (67vs 59 years). The endoleak incidence stood at 7.8% (95% CI: 3.3%-18.3%) with Type-I the as prominent (48%). Rupture presentation was in 3%, whilst esophageal fistulation (n = 2/3) was associated with morbidity of 66%. Treatment varied, with TEVAR and carotid-subclavian bypass being the most common modality of the choice. The median follow-up was 12 months (IQR, 1-60 months). The observed incidence of mortality, morbidity, and endoleak shows the current role of the hybrid approach in managing ASA. These results emphasize the critical role of detailed surgical planning, combined endovascular and open expertise, and the necessity for a common registry to monitor long-term outcomes.

Outcomes in acute carotid-related stroke eligible for mechanical reperfusion: SAFEGUARD-STROKE Registry.

Carotid-related strokes (CRS) are largely unresponsive to intravenous thrombolysis and are often large and disabling. Little is known about contemporary CRS referral pathways and proportion of eligible patients who receive emergency mechanical reperfusion (EMR). Referral pathways, serial imaging, treatment data, and neurologic outcomes were evaluated in consecutive CRS patients presenting over 18 months in catchment area of a major carotid disease referral center with proximal-protected CAS expertise, on-site neurology, and stroke thrombectomy capability (Acute Stroke of CArotid Artery Bifurcation Origin Treated With Use oF the MicronEt-covered CGUARD Stent - SAFEGUARD-STROKE Registry; companion to SAFEGUARD-STROKE Study NCT05195658). Of 101 EMR-eligible patients (31% i.v.-thrombolyzed, 39.5% women, age 39-89 years, 94.1% ASPECTS 9-10, 90.1% pre-stroke mRS 0-1), 57 (56.4%) were EMR-referred. Referrals were either endovascular (Comprehensive Stroke Centre, CSC, 21.0%; Stroke Thrombectomy-Capable CAS Centre, STCC, 70.2%) or to vascular surgery (VS, 1.8%), with >1 referral attempt in 7.0% patients (CSC/VS or VS/CSC or CSC/VS/STCC). Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were not different between EMR-treated and EMR-untreated patients. EMR was delivered to 42.6% eligible patients (emergency carotid surgery 0%; STCC rejections 0%). On multivariable analysis, non-tandem CRS was a predictor of not getting referred for EMR (OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.14-0.93, P=0.03). Ninety-day neurologic status was profoundly better in EMR-treated patients; mRS 0-2 (83.7% vs. 34.5%); mRS 3-5 (11.6% vs. 53.4%), mRS 6 (4.6% vs. 12.1%); P<0.001 for all. EMR-treatment substantially improves CRS neurologic outcomes but only a minority of EMR-eligible patients receive EMR. To increase the likelihood of brain-saving treatment, EMR-eligible stroke referral and management pathways, including those for CSC/VS-rejected patients, should involve stroke thrombectomy-capable centres with endovascular carotid treatment expertise.

Disease Specific Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Undergoing Revascularisation of Femoropopliteal Lesions

Patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) suffer from pain and non-healing ulcers, which impact negatively on both their physical and mental health. While maintaining and improving quality of life is a principal aim with all treatments, little is known about the health related quality of life (HRQoL) of CLTI patients and how revascularisation procedures impact on HRQoL endpoints. The aim of this study was to investigate disease specific HRQoL before and after revascularisation in patients with CLTI undergoing femoropopliteal revascularisation. HRQoL was prospectively analysed in 190 CLTI patients with main atherosclerotic target lesions in the femoropopliteal segment, who were planned for endovascular or open revascularisation. The choice of revascularisation method was made by the vascular team, represented by both open and endovascular expertise. The Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQoL) questionnaire was used to assess disease specific HRQoL before revascularisation and one month, one year, and two years after the procedure. Main endpoints were mean VascuQoL score changes, effect sizes of observed changes and the proportion reaching a minimally important difference (half a standard deviation change from baseline) during two years after revascularisation. Patient reported VascuQoL scores were low at baseline (mean 2.68, 95% CI 1.18 - 4.17). After revascularisation, the mean VascuQoL score improved statistically significantly over time, with the largest improvement observed after one year (difference from baseline 2.02, 95% CI 1.75 - 2.29; p < .001). No differences in HRQoL change over time were observed between patients treated with endovascular approaches compared with bypass surgery. Approximately half the patients reached the minimally important threshold at one year (53%), which was largely maintained also at two years (41%). While CLTI profoundly affected HRQoL, a large and clinically meaningful HRQoL increase was observed after revascularisation. This confirms the value of CLTI revascularisation on HRQoL and underlines the importance of including patient reported outcomes when evaluating revascularisation procedures in CLTI patients.

Embolization as stand-alone strategy for pediatric low-grade brain arteriovenous malformations

ObjectivesWe evaluated the safety and efficacy of endovascular embolization as first-line stand-alone strategy for the treatment of low-grade brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) (Spetzler Martin [SM] grade I and II) in pediatric patients. In addition, we assessed the predictors of procedure-related complications and radiographic complete obliteration in a single session. Material and methodsWe conducted a single center retrospective cohort study of all pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent embolization as a stand-alone strategy for low-grade bAVMs between 2010 and 2022. Safety was measured by procedure-related complications and mortality. Efficacy was defined as complete angiographic obliteration after the last embolization session. ResultsSixty-eight patients (41 females; median age 14 years) underwent a total of 102 embolization sessions. There were 24 (35%) SM grade I lesions and 44 (65%) grade II. Six procedure-related complications (5.8% of procedures) were observed and no deaths were reported. All the complications were intraoperative nidus ruptures. A single draining vein was the only significant predictor of procedure-related complications (OR=0.10; 95% CI 0.01 – 0.72; p=0.048). Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved in 44 patients (65%). In 35 patients (51%) the bAVM was completely occluded in one session. The bAVM nidal size was a predictor of complete obliteration in one session (OR=0.44; 95% CI, 0.21–0.80; p=0.017). ConclusionEndovascular treatment as a stand-alone strategy for pediatric low-grade bAVMs is an adequate first-line approach in high volume centers with endovascular expertise. Nidal size evaluation is relevant in order to optimize patient selection for embolization as a stand-alone treatment modality.

Learning insertion of a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) catheter: Is clinical experience necessary? A prospective trial

BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging and potentially life-saving procedure, necessitating qualified operators in an increasing number of centres. The procedure shares technical elements with other vascular access procedures using the Seldinger technique, which is mastered by doctors not only in endovascular specialties but also in trauma surgery, emergency medicine, and anaesthesiology. We hypothesised that doctors mastering the Seldinger technique (experienced anaesthesiologist) would learn the technical aspects of REBOA with limited training and remain technically superior to doctors unfamiliar with the Seldinger technique (novice residents) given similar training. MethodsThis was a prospective trial of an educational intervention. Three groups of doctors were enroled: novice residents, experienced anaesthesiologists, and endovascular experts. The novices and the anaesthesiologists completed 2.5 h of simulation-based REBOA training. Their skills were tested before and 8–12 weeks after training using a standardised simulated scenario. The endovascular experts, constituting a reference group, were equivalently tested. All performances were video recorded and rated by three blinded experts using a validated assessment tool for REBOA (REBOA-RATE). Performances were compared between groups and with a previously published pass/fail cutoff. ResultsSixteen novices, 13 board-certified specialists in anaesthesiology, and 13 endovascular experts participated. Before training, the anaesthesiologists outperformed the novices by 30 percentage points of the maximum REBOA-RATE score (56% (SD 14.0) vs 26% (SD 17%), p<0.01). After training, there was no difference in skills between the two groups (78% (SD 11%) vs 78 (SD 14%), p = 0.93). Neither group reached the endovascular experts' skill level (89% (SD 7%), p<0.05). ConclusionFor doctors mastering the Seldinger technique, there was an initial inter-procedural transfer of skills advantage when performing REBOA. However, after identical simulation-based training, novices performed equally well to anaesthesiologists, indicating that vascular access experience is not a prerequisite to learning the technical aspects of REBOA. Both groups would need more training to reach technical proficiency.

The Endovascular Options For Management of Superficial Femoral Artery Osteal Occlusions

Background: Endovascular intervention is now the primary line of treatment for patients with critical limb ischemia.Nevertheless, endovascular experts face several obstacles with these treatments due to the existence of broad multilevellesions, osteal lesions, and lengthy and entire chronic occlusive lesions.Aim of this work: Evaluation the different endovascular techniques of management the superficial femoral arteryosteal lesions in cases with critical limb ischemia or incapacitating claudication.Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study of 55 patients who presented to Beni Suef University Hospitals’vascular surgery unit between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusivedisease of the osteal region of SFA are included in the research.Results: Technical success was done in 92.7% of cases. Figure (4) shows that;the mean hospital stay of cases in thisstudy was 1.53 ± 0.81 days with range (1.0 – 4.0).Follow up at 1 and 3 months revealed that; patency was kept in 51(100%), 49 (96.07%) and 40 (78.43%) of all technical successful cases in one, three and six months respectively.Conclusion: Endovascular treatments show promising prospects as treatment options for SFA atherosclerotic occlusivedisorders, particularly when osteal lesions are present. Endovascular intervention techniques, facilities, and expertisehave greatly improved, resulting in a high technical success rate and a high proportion of lower limb patency in CLIpatients.

Middle aortic syndrome in children and adolescents.

Middle aortic syndrome is a rare form of renovascular disease that may present with severe hypertension during childhood. Narrowing of the abdominal aorta is often associated with narrowing of the renal and/or other visceral arteries and may be secondary to specific genetic syndromes. Following the optimization of blood pressure control, significant aortic narrowing often requires invasive management, including endovascular and surgical intervention. In younger children, endovascular therapy may be attempted in the first instance to acutely reduce the pressure gradient across the narrowing; however, a sustained benefit is rare. Once the child has grown to accommodate a graft of an adequate size, surgical therapy is indicated for patients in whom medical and/or endovascular management has not resulted in adequate blood pressure control. It is critical that individuals with middle aortic syndrome be managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team that includes medical, endovascular, and surgical expertise that can provide long-term care to monitor for recurrent hypertension and evidence of end-organ damage.

Genetics and Emerging Therapies for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are characterized by a high-pressure, low-resistance vascular nidus created by direct shunting of blood from feeding arteries into arterialized veins, bypassing intervening capillaries. AVMs pose a risk of spontaneous rupture because the vessel walls are continuously exposed to increased shear stress and abnormal flow phenomena, which lead to vessel wall inflammation and distinct morphologic changes. The annual rupture rate is estimated at 2%, and once an AVM ruptures, the risk of rerupture increases 5-fold. The ability of AVMs to grow, regress, recur, and undergo remodeling shows their dynamic nature. Identifying the underlying cellular and molecular pathways of AVMs not only helps us understand their natural physiology but also allows us to directly block vital pathways, thus preventing AVM development and progression. Management of AVMs is challenging and often necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, including neurosurgical, endovascular, and radiosurgical expertise. Because many of these procedures are invasive, carry a risk of inciting hemorrhage, or are controversial, the demand for pharmacologic treatment options is increasing. In this review, we introduce novel findings of cellular and molecular AVM physiology and highlight key signaling mediators that are potential targets for AVM treatment. Furthermore, we give an overview of syndromes associated with hereditary and nonhereditary AVM formation and discuss causative genetic alterations.

Reliable and valid assessment of procedural skills in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Valid and reliable assessment of skills is essential for improved and evidence-based training concepts. In a recent study, we presented a novel tool to assess procedural skills in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), REBOA-RATE, based on international expert consensus. Although expert consensus is a strong foundation, the performance of REBOA-RATE has not been explored. The study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of REBOA-RATE. This was an experimental simulation-based study. We enrolled doctors with three levels of expertise to perform two REBOA procedures in a simulated scenario of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Procedures were video-recorded, and videos were blinded and randomized. Three clinical experts independently rated all procedures using REBOA-RATE. Data were analyzed using Messick's framework for validity evidence, including generalizability analysis of reliability and determination of a pass/fail standard. Forty-two doctors were enrolled: 16 novices, 13 anesthesiologists, and 13 endovascular experts. They all performed two procedures, yielding 84 procedures and 252 ratings. The REBOA-RATE assessment tool showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and excellent interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97). Assessment using one rater and three procedures could ensure overall reliability suitable for high-stakes testing (G-coefficient >0.80). Mean scores (SD) for the three groups in the second procedure were as follows: novices, 32% (24%); anesthesiologists, 55% (29%); endovascular experts, 93% (4%) (p < 0.001). The pass/fail standard was set at 81%, which all experts but no novices passed. Data strongly support the reliability and validity of REBOA-RATE, which successfully discriminated between all experience levels. The REBOA-RATE assessment tool requires minimal instruction, and one rater is sufficient for reliable assessment. Together, these are strong arguments for the use of REBOA-RATE to assess REBOA skills, allowing for competency-based training and certification concepts. Diagnostic test, no or poor gold standard, level V.

Can a trainee perform endovascular aortic repair as effectively and safely as an experienced specialist?

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is a technically demanding procedure usually carried out by highly experienced surgeons. However, in this era of modern endovascular surgery with growing numbers of patients qualifying for the procedure, the need to enhance surgical training has emerged. Our aim was to compare the technical results of EVAR in patients operated on by trainees to that of those operated on by an endovascular expert. Between 2016 and 2018, a total of 119 patients diagnosed with an abdominal aorta disease requiring EVAR were admitted to our clinic. Overall, we included 96 patients who underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography and EVAR performed either by an endovascular expert (N = 51) or a trainee (N = 45). We detected no difference in the baseline characteristics, indication for EVAR and preoperative anatomy between patients operated on by trainees and our endovascular expert. We noted the same incidence of endoleak type Ia occurrence (n = 2 vs n = 2, P = 1.00), reintervention rate (n = 0 vs n = 0, P = 1.00) and in-hospital mortality (n = 0 vs n = 1, P = 1.00) for operations done by trainees and the expert, respectively. There was no difference in X-ray doses or time between the 2 groups. Despite longer median operation times [112 (first quartile: 84; third quartile: 129) vs 89 (75-104) min; P = 0.03] and in-hospital stays [10 (8-13) vs 8 (7-10) days, P = 0.007] of the patients operated on by trainees, the overall clinical success of EVAR was satisfactory in both groups. An EVAR planned and performed by a trainee need not raise the cumulative risk of the procedure. Trainees who have undergone both mind and hand skills training can therefore carry out EVAR under the supervision of an experienced specialist as effectively and safely as experts do.

Educational Impact of a Pulsatile Human Cadaver Circulation Model for Endovascular Training

The face and construct validity of a novel pulsatile human cadaver model (PHCM) was recently demonstrated for endovascular training. This study aimed to assess the model's educational impact. Twenty-four endovascular novices were recruited and split into two equal training groups: PHCM and virtual reality simulator (VRS). Each candidate performed eight consecutive training attempts of endovascular renal artery catheterisation on their designated model, and a final crossover attempt on the alternate model. Performances were video recorded and scored using a validated scoring tool by two independent endovascular experts, blinded to the candidate's identity and attempt number. Each participant was given a task specific checklist score (TSC), global rating score (GRS), and overall procedure score (OPS). In the PHCM group average OPS improved gradually from 19.42 (TSC 8.58, GRS 10.83) to 39.50 (TSC 15.00, GRS 24.5) over eight attempts (p<.0005). In the VRS group OPS improved from 20.54 (TSC 10.29, GRS 10.25) to 36.04 (TSC 14.21, GRS 21.88) between the first and eighth attempts (p<.0005), with limited improvement after the second attempt. PHCM training significantly improved OPS on their VRS crossover attempt (p≤.0001), achieving a similar OPS to candidates who had completed VRS training (p=.398). VRS training significantly improved OPS on PHCM (p<0.05); however, OPS was significantly worse than candidates who had completed PHCM training (p≤.001). PHCM training has a longer learning curve, with gradual improvement, reflecting the enhanced difficulty of a more realistic model. These results support the use of PHCM preceded by VRS training, prior to performing endovascular surgery on patients.

A Binational Need Assessment to Define the Level of Endovascular Expertise Required by Vascular Surgical Trainees

There has been a shift toward competency-based surgical education programs to improve trainee performance and achieve better patient outcomes. Endovascular procedures comprise a significant volume of vascular surgery, but the current methods for assessing the endovascular competence of vascular trainees in Australia and New Zealand are suboptimal. The objective of this study was to perform a need assessment to define the scope of endovascular expertise required by vascular surgical trainees to later aid in the development of novel surgical training assessment tools. A modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert consensus. Fifty-three key stakeholders in vascular surgical education and training (SET) in Australia and New Zealand were invited to take part in the 2-stage survey. Experts were asked which procedures they considered to be requisite for vascular surgery trainees and at which SET level competence should be achieved. The results were reiterated to the expert panel in the second stage, and consensus considered achieved if over 75% of experts were in agreement. In the first stage 25 experts reached consensus that competence in 18 of the 26 procedures should be requisite for SET trainees. Twenty-two experts responded to the second stage and consensus was achieved for 12 out of 14 of the procedural items with mean percentage of experts in agreement being 90%. A need assessment using a modified Delphi method has achieved consensus among experts in vascular surgery regarding the endovascular procedures considered to be requisite for vascular surgery trainees in Australia and New Zealand.

AB032. 240. Compliance with instructions for use in endovascular abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair in those aged over 80 years of age

Background: The endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) 2 trial advocated not intervening in those deemed unfit for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In the 14 years since EVAR 2 finished recruiting, there have been advances in endovascular technology and expertise, in addition to improvements in anaesthetic and critical care outcomes. These, in concert with an aging population, have led to greater numbers of elderly patients being treated with EVAR. We sought to determine our outcomes when treating this population.

Damage control of caval injuries in a porcine model using a retrievable Rescue stent

ObjectiveEarly hemorrhage control before the operating room is essential to reduce the significant mortality associated with traumatic injuries of the vena cava. Conventional approaches present logistical challenges on the battlefield or in the trauma bay. A retrievable stent graft would allow rapid hemorrhage control in the preoperative setting when endovascular expertise is not immediately available and without committing a patient to the limitations of current permanent stents. This study details a refined retrievable Rescue stent for percutaneous delivery that was examined in a porcine survival model of penetrating caval hemorrhage. MethodsA retrievable caval stent was reduced in delivery profile to a 9F sheath using finite element analysis. The final stent was constructed with a “petal and stem” design using nitinol wire followed by covering with polytetrafluoroethylene. Seven Yorkshire pigs (79-86 kg) underwent 22F injury of the infrarenal vena cava with intentional class II hemorrhage (1200 mL). Percutaneous deployment of the Rescue stent was used to temporize hemorrhage for 60 minutes, followed by resuscitation with cell saver blood and permanent caval repair. Hemorrhage control was documented with photography and angiography. Vital signs were recorded and laboratory values were measured out to 48 hours postoperatively. Data were examined with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. ResultsThe profile of the caval Rescue stent was successfully reduced from 16F to 9F while remaining within fracture and shape memory limits for nitinol. In addition, both rapid deployment and recapture were preserved. Following intentional hemorrhage after caval injury, animals revealed a significant drop in mean arterial pressure (average, 30 mm Hg), acidosis, and elevated lactate level compared with before injury. Compared with uncontrolled hemorrhage, which resulted in death in <9 minutes, the Rescue stent achieved hemorrhage control in <1 minute after venous access in all seven animals. All animals were successfully recovered after permanent repair. There was no significant change in levels of transaminases, bilirubin, creatinine, or hemoglobin at 48 hours compared with preinjury baseline. ConclusionsA retrievable Rescue stent achieved rapid percutaneous hemorrhage control after a significant traumatic injury of the vena cava and allowed successful recovery of all injured animals. Further development of this approach may have utility in preoperative damage control of caval injuries.

Evaluating the Construct Validity of a Pulsatile Fresh Frozen Human Cadaver Circulation Model for Endovascular Training

We recently described a pulsatile fresh frozen human cadaver model (PHCM) for training endovascular practitioners. This present study aims to assess the construct validity of PHCM; its ability to differentiate between participants of varying expertise. Twenty-three participants with varying endovascular experience (12 novice, 4 intermediate, and 7 expert) were recruited. Each attempted catheterization of the left renal artery on PHCM within 10min under exam conditions. Performances were video recorded and scored using a validated scoring tool by 2 independent endovascular experts, blinded to performer status. Each participant was given a task-specific checklist score (TSC), global rating score (GRS), and overall procedure score (OPS). Finally, examiners were asked whether they would be happy to supervise the participant in theater, with each participant graded as "fail", "borderline," or "pass". All expert and intermediate participants completed the index procedure within the allotted 10min; however, only one of the 12 novice participants achieved this (P<0.0005). Endovascular novices had significantly lower TSC, GRS, and OPS than both intermediate participants and endovascular experts. There were no significant differences in TSC, GRS, or OPS between intermediate participants and endovascular experts. When participants were graded as "fail", "borderline," or "pass," there were significant differences between groups (P=0.001). All of the intermediate and expert participants received a pass. Out of the 12 novice participants, 2 received a pass, 6 received a borderline, and 4 were failed. The PHCM demonstrates construct validity. Further work is required to determine its educational impact in endovascular training.

A retrievable rescue stent graft and radiofrequency positioning for rapid control of noncompressible hemorrhage.

Noncompressible hemorrhage of the torso remains a challenging surgical dilemma. Stent graft repair requires endovascular expertise, imaging, and inventory that are not available within the critical window of massive hemorrhage. We developed a retrievable stent graft for rapid hemorrhage. We further investigated a radiofrequency (RF) positioning approach as a possible alternative to the logistics of fluoroscopy. A retrievable stent graft was constructed with a novel "petal and stem" design from nitinol and covered with a sleeve of electrospun polyurethane. The stent graft was tested using an in vitro model of simulated hemorrhage. Next, the stent graft was examined in vivo using a porcine model of noncompressible hemorrhage. The stent was examined for hemorrhage control in a porcine model of either aortic or caval injury. An RF reader was assembled from an Arduino processor while RF tags were affixed to the ends of the stent graft. Detection accuracy of a handheld RF wand for an RF tag was quantified both in vitro and through tissue. The retrievable RESCUEstent graft was deployed within minutes and rapidly controlled traumatic hemorrhage angiographically in both aortic injury (n = 3) and caval injury (n = 2). Stent grafts were easily recaptured in both models in under 15 seconds. The LED light of a handheld RF detector illuminated when positioned directly over an RF tag. The RF detection approach revealed positioning accuracy to within 1 cm of the intended target, despite tissue interference. This study demonstrates the rapid deployment and retrieval of a RESCUE stent graft as well as the ability to tamponade injuries of the aorta and cava. In addition, this study demonstrates the feasibility of RF tags to guide stent placement through tissue. More rigorous models are needed to define the effectiveness of this approach in the setting of vascular injury and shock.

How to define the hemodynamic significance of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis: Review of literature and outcomes of an international questionnaire.

Purpose The goal of the study was to review current literature regarding the diagnosis of equivocal (50-70%) iliofemoral artery stenosis and compare these findings with the daily practice of an international panel of endovascular experts. Methods The Medline Database was searched for relevant publications, and an electronic survey was sent to experts in the field covering the following topics: definition of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis, angiographic visualization and investigation protocols of an equivocal stenosis, intra-arterial pressure measurements, and definition of hemodynamic significance of an equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis using a physiologic measure. Results Of the 37 invited endovascular experts, 21 (53.8%) agreed to participate in the survey. Analysis of existing literature shows that the level of evidence for diagnosing equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis is mediocre and is not being implemented by experts in the field. Conclusion Studies have shown that a stenosis of between 50% and 70% iliofemoral lumen diameter reduction shows a wide range of trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Equivocal iliofemoral artery stenosis can best be identified using three-dimensional quantitative vascular analysis software. Although evidence for a clear hemodynamic cutoff point is weak, performing trans-lesion intra-arterial pressure measurements at rest and during maximal hyperemia is preferred. Diagnosing iliofemoral artery stenosis solely on lumen diameter reduction is inadequate.

The endovascular performance spectrum of vascular surgery departments in Germany: Results of an online survey among senior department physicians.

AimTo survey the scope of vascular surgery services in Germany.MethodA total of 308 senior German vascular surgeons received a 19-point questionnaire pertaining to department structure and scope of services. Of these surgeons 223 replied between 16 August 2015 and 23 October 2015 (response rate 72 %), with 62.2 % reporting an additional qualification as an endovascular surgeon according to the guidelines of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefäßchirurgie und Gefäßmedizin, DGG) and 43.5 % as a DGG® endovascular specialist.ResultsThe number of respondents fully authorized to train in vascular surgery was 71.3 %, while 28.3 % were authorized for limited training. Authorization as a DGG® endovascular surgeon was reported by 24.2 % and authorization as a DGG® endovascular specialist by 17 % of respondents. All respondents performed endovascular interventions on pelvic vessels and 99.1 % also reported carrying out femoral and popliteal endovascular interventions. Endovascular procedures in crural vessels were carried out by 90.1 % and 93.7 % of vascular surgeons performed endovascular procedures in the region of the abdominal aorta (segment V), arteriovenous (AV) fistulas and shunts (85.2 %), upper extremity vessels (80.3 %), the thoracic aorta (segment III, 68.2 %), renal arteries (62.8 %) and visceral aorta (segment IV, 60.5 %). In all 43.5 % of respondents reported experience with endovascular procedures on the carotid bifurcation. Percutaneous arterial procedures formed the focus of endovascular activity, totalling on average 259 interventions per year and department, followed by diagnostic angiography (without intervention) at 166 procedures per year and hybrid arterial interventions at 141 interventions per year.ConclusionThis survey revealed a high level of endovascular expertise among vascular surgeons in Germany. This applies not only to the scope of endovascular activities in diagnosis and treatment but also to the number of estimated annual procedures.

The impact of hybrid neurosurgeons on the outcomes of endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE The impact of combined practices on the outcomes of unruptured cerebral aneurysm coiling remains an issue of debate. The authors investigated the association of combined open and endovascular expertise with the outcomes of unruptured cerebral aneurysm coiling. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who underwent endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms between 2007 and 2012. To control for confounding, the authors used propensity score conditioning, with mixed effects to account for clustering at the hospital referral region level. RESULTS During the study period, there were 11,716 patients who underwent endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1186 (10.1%) underwent treatment performed by hybrid neurosurgeons, and 10,530 (89.9%) by proceduralists who performed only endovascular coiling. Multivariable regression analysis with propensity score adjustment demonstrated a lack of association of combined practice with 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.58-1.23), discharge to rehabilitation (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.66-1.51), 30-day readmission rate (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.83-1.38), and length of stay (adjusted difference, 0.41; 95% CI -0.26 to 1.09). Higher procedural volume was independently associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of Medicare patients, the authors did not demonstrate a difference in mortality, discharge to rehabilitation, readmission rate, and LOS between hybrid neurosurgeons and proceduralists performing only endovascular coiling.

Unruptured cerebral aneurysm clipping: association of combined open and endovascular expertise with outcomes

BackgroundIt is often questioned if one physician can conduct both open and endovascular techniques successfully and safely.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of combined open and endovascular expertise with the outcomes of...