Endotracheal Epinephrine Research Articles

Endotracheal epinephrine at standard versus high dose for resuscitation of asystolic newborn lambs

IntroductionEndotracheal (ET) epinephrine administration is an option during neonatal resuscitation, if the preferred intravenous (IV) route is unavailable. ObjectivesWe assessed whether endotracheal epinephrine achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and maintained physiological stability after ROSC, at standard and higher dose, in severely asphyxiated newborn lambs. MethodsNear-term fetal lambs were asphyxiated until asystole. Resuscitation was commenced with ventilation and chest compressions. Lambs were randomly allocated to: IV Saline placebo (5 ml/kg), IV Epinephrine (20 micrograms/kg), Standard-dose ET Epinephrine (100 micrograms/kg), and High-dose ET Epinephrine (1 mg/kg). After three allocated treatment doses, rescue IV Epinephrine was administered if ROSC had not occurred. Lambs achieving ROSC were monitored for 60 minutes. Brain histology was assessed for microbleeds. ResultsROSC in response to allocated treatment (without rescue IV Epinephrine) occurred in 1/6 Saline, 9/9 IV Epinephrine, 0/9 Standard-dose ET Epinephrine, and 7/9 High-dose ET Epinephrine lambs respectively. Blood pressure during CPR increased after treatment with IV Epinephrine and High-dose ET Epinephrine, but not Saline or Standard-dose ET Epinephrine.After ROSC, both ET Epinephrine groups had lower pH, higher lactate, and higher blood pressure than the IV Epinephrine group. Cortex microbleeds were more frequent in High-dose ET Epinephrine lambs (8/8 lambs examined, versus 3/8 in IV Epinephrine lambs). ConclusionsThe currently recommended dose of ET Epinephrine was ineffective in achieving ROSC. Without convincing clinical or preclinical evidence of efficacy, use of ET Epinephrine at this dose may not be appropriate. High-dose ET Epinephrine requires further evaluation before clinical translation.

Effects of Endotracheal Epinephrine on Pharmacokinetics and Survival in a Swine Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Model.

The aim of this study was to compare the endotracheal tube (ET) and intravenous (IV) administration of epinephrine relative to concentration maximum, time to maximum concentration, mean concentration over time (MC), area under the curve, odds, and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a normovolemic pediatric cardiac arrest model. Male swine weighing 24-37 kg were assigned to 4 groups: ET (n = 8), IV (n = 7), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) + defibrillation (CPR + Defib) (n = 5), and CPR only (n = 3). Swine were placed arrest for 2 minutes, and then CPR was initiated for 2 minutes. Epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) for the ET group or 0.01 mg/kg for the IV was administered every 4 minutes or until ROSC. Defibrillation started at 3 minutes and continued every 2 minutes for 30 minutes or until ROSC for all groups except the CPR-only group. Blood samples were collected over a period of 5 minutes. The MC of plasma epinephrine for the IV group was significantly higher at the 30- and 60-second time points (P = 0.001). The ET group had a significantly higher MC of epinephrine at the 180- and 240-second time points (P < 0.05). The concentration maximum of plasma epinephrine was significantly lower for the ET group (195 ± 32 ng/mL) than for the IV group (428 ± 38 ng/mL) (P = 0.01). The time to maximum concentration was significantly longer for the ET group (145 ± 26 seconds) than for the IV group (42 ± 16 seconds) (P = 0.01). No significant difference existed in area under the curve between the 2 groups (P = 0.62). The odds of ROSC were 7.7 times greater for the ET versus IV group. Time to ROSC was not significantly different among the IV, ET, and CPR + Defib groups (P = 0.31). Based on the results of this study, the ET route of administration should be considered a first-line intervention.

Changes in vital signs during adrenaline administration for hemostasis in intracordal injection: an observational study with a hypothetical design of endotracheal adrenaline administration in cardiopulmonary arrest

BackgroundThe background is that intravenous adrenaline administration is recommended for advanced cardiovascular life support in adults and endotracheal administration is given low priority. The reason is that the optimal dose of adrenaline in endotracheal administration is unknown, and it is ethically difficult to design studies of endotracheal adrenaline administration with non-cardiopulmonary arrest. We otolaryngologists think so because we administered adrenaline to the vocal folds for hemostasis after intracordal injection under local anesthesia, but have had few cases of vital changes. We hypothesized that examining vital signs before and after adrenaline administration for hemostasis would help determine the optimal dose of endotracheal adrenaline.MethodsWe retrospectively examined the medical records of 79 patients who visited our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 and received adrenaline in the vocal folds and trachea for hemostasis by intracordal injection under local anesthesia to investigate changes in heart rate and systolic blood pressure before and after the injection.ResultsThe mean heart rates before and after injection were 83.96 ± 18.51 (standard deviation) beats per minute (bpm) and 81.50 ± 15.38 (standard deviation) bpm, respectively. The mean systolic blood pressure before and after the injection were 138.13 ± 25.33 (standard deviation) mmHg and 135.72 ± 22.19 (standard deviation) mmHg, respectively. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure had P-values of 0.136, and 0.450, respectively, indicating no significant differences.ConclusionsAlthough this study was an observational, changes in vital signs were investigated assuming endotracheal adrenaline administration. The current recommended dose of adrenaline in endotracheal administration with cardiopulmonary arrest may not be effective. In some cases of cardiopulmonary arrest, intravenous and intraosseous routes of adrenaline administration may be difficult and the opportunity for resuscitation may be missed. Therefore, it is desirable to have many options for adrenaline administration. Therefore, if the optimal dose and efficacy of endotracheal adrenaline administration can be clarified, early adrenaline administration will be possible, which will improve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival discharge rates.

Impact of the route of adrenaline administration in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on 30-day survival with good neurological outcome (ETIVIO study)

BackgroundOver the past decades, international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have changed the recommendation for alternative routes for drug administration. Until now, evidence for the substantial superiority of one route with respect to treatment outcome after CPR has been lacking. The present study compares the effects of intravenous (IV), intraosseous (IO) and endotracheal (ET) adrenaline application during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on clinical outcomes within the database of the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR).MethodsThis registry analysis was based on the GRR cohort of 212,228 OHCA patients between 1989 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were: OHCA, application of adrenaline, and out-of-hospital CPR. Excluded from the study were patients younger than 18 years, those who had trauma or bleeding as suspected causes of cardiac arrest, and incomplete data sets. The clinical endpoint was hospital discharge with good neurological outcome [cerebral performance category (CPC) 1/2]. Four routes of adrenaline administration were compared: IV, IO, IO + IV, ET + IV. Group comparisons were done using matched-pair analysis and binary logistic regression.ResultsIn matched-pair group comparisons of the primary clinical outcome hospital discharge with CPC 1/2, the IV group (n = 2416) showed better results compared to IO (n = 1208), [odds ratio (OR): 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54–3.84, p < 0.01] and when comparing IV (n = 8706) to IO + IV (n = 4353), [OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12–1.59, p < 0.01]. In contrast, no significant difference was found between IV (n = 532) and ET + IV (n = 266), [OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.55–2.90, p = 0.59]. Concurrently, binary logistic regression yielded a highly significant effect of vascular access type (χ² = 67.744(3), p < 0.001) on hospital discharge with CPC1/2, with negative effects for IO (regression coefficient (r.c.) = − 0.766, p = 0.001) and IO + IV (r.c. = − 0.201, p = 0,028) and no significant effect for ET + IV (r.c. = 0.117, p = 0.770) compared to IV.ConclusionsThe GRR data, collected over a period of 31 years, seem to emphasize the relevance of an IV access during out-of-hospital CPR, in the event that adrenaline had to be administered. IO administration of adrenaline might be less effective. ET application, though removed in 2010 from international guidelines, could gain importance as an alternative route again.

Inadequate Bioavailability of Intramuscular Epinephrine in a Neonatal Asphyxia Model.

BackgroundOver half a million newborn deaths are attributed to intrapartum related events annually, the majority of which occur in low resource settings. While progress has been made in reducing the burden of asphyxia, novel approaches may need to be considered to further decrease rates of newborn mortality. Administration of intravenous, intraosseous or endotracheal epinephrine is recommended by the Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) with sustained bradycardia at birth. However, delivery by these routes requires both advanced skills and specialized equipment. Intramuscular (IM) epinephrine may represent a simple, low cost and highly accessible alternative for consideration in the care of infants compromised at birth. At present, the bioavailability of IM epinephrine in asphyxia remains unclear.MethodsFour term fetal lambs were delivered by cesarean section and asphyxiated by umbilical cord occlusion with resuscitation after 5 min of asystole. IM epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered intradeltoid after 1 min of positive pressure ventilation with 30 s of chest compressions. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma epinephrine concentrations by ELISA.ResultsEpinephrine concentrations failed to increase following administration via IM injection. Delayed absorption was observed after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in half of the studies.ConclusionsInadequate absorption of epinephrine occurs with IM administration during asphyxial cardiac arrest, implying this route would be ineffective in infants who are severely compromised at birth. Late absorption following ROSC raises concerns for risks of side effects. However, the bioavailability and efficacy of intramuscular epinephrine in less profound asphyxia may warrant further evaluation.

Abstract 126: Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Epinephrine Administration for Pediatric Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: The 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation recommend intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) epinephrine administration for pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, it is unknown whether the route of epinephrine administration affects patient outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the association between the route of epinephrine administration and survival. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry, a prospective multicenter OHCA registry from 2011 through 2015 in North America. We included pediatric patients (≤18 years) with OHCA for whom emergency medical services (EMS) providers attempted resuscitation and administered epinephrine via IV or IO. We excluded patients who received endotracheal epinephrine, received both IV and IO epinephrine, received IV epinephrine with failed IO access, and received IO epinephrine with failed IV access. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We used multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for age, sex, initial rhythm, location of arrest, witness status, receiving layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 9-1-1 call to EMS arrival, and advanced airway management. We also conducted a propensity score matching analysis with the same covariates. Results: Of the eligible 831 pediatric patients with OHCA, 226 (27.2%) received IV epinephrine and 605 (72.8%) IO epinephrine. Median interval between 9-1-1 call and epinephrine administration was 16.4 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 12.9-21.0) in IV group and 16.2 minutes (IQR 12.8-20.0) in IO group. In the logistic regression model, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the IO group for survival to hospital discharge was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-2.40), compared with the IV group. Similarly, in the propensity score analysis, 218 patients underwent matching with good balance (standardized differences &lt;0.25 for all covariates) and the OR of the IO group for survival to hospital discharge was 1.00 (95% CI 0.38-2.62). Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in survival to hospital between pediatric patients with OHCA who received epinephrine via IV and IO routes.

The Route, Dose, and Interval of Epinephrine for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Systematic Review.

Current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation recommendations on epinephrine administration during neonatal resuscitation were derived in 2010 from indirect evidence in animal or pediatric studies. Systematic review of human infant and relevant animal studies comparing other doses, routes, and intervals of epinephrine administration in neonatal resuscitation with (currently recommended) administration of 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg doses given intravenously (IV) every 3 to 5 minutes. Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and trial registry databases. Predefined criteria were used for selection. Risk of bias was assessed by using published tools appropriate for the study type. Certainty of evidence was assessed by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Only 2 of 4 eligible cohort studies among 593 unique retrieved records yielded data allowing comparisons. There were no differences between IV and endotracheal epinephrine for the primary outcome of death at hospital discharge (risk ratio = 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.71]) or for failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation, time to return of spontaneous circulation (1 study; 50 infants), or proportion receiving additional epinephrine (2 studies; 97 infants). There were no differences in outcomes between 2 endotracheal doses (1 study). No human infant studies were found in which authors addressed IV dose or dosing interval. The search yielded sparse human evidence of very low certainty (downgraded for serious risk of bias and imprecision). Administration of epinephrine by endotracheal versus IV routes resulted in similar survival and other outcomes. However, in animal studies, researchers continue to suggest benefit of IV administration using currently recommended doses.

Endotracheal Administered Epinephrine Is Effective in Return of Spontaneous Circulation Within a Pediatric Swine Hypovolemic Cardiac Arrest Model.

Early administration of epinephrine increases the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and improves outcomes among pediatric cardiac arrest victims. Rapid endotracheal (ET) intubation can facilitate early administration of epinephrine to pediatric victims. To date, no studies have evaluated the use of ET epinephrine in a pediatric hypovolemic cardiac arrest model to determine the incidence of ROSC. This prospective, experimental study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and/or incidence of ROSC following ET administered epinephrine and compared it to these experimental groups: intravenous (IV) administered epinephrine, cardiopulmonary resuscitation only (CPR), and CPR + defibrillation (CPR + Defib). Endotracheal administered epinephrine, at the Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) recommended dose, was not significantly different than IV administered epinephrine in maximum plasma concentrations, time to maximum plasma concentration, area under the curve, or ROSC, or mean plasma concentrations at various time points (P > 0.05). The odds of ROSC in the ET group were 2.4 times greater than the IV group. The onset to ROSC in the ET group was significantly shorter than the IV group (P < 0.0001). These data support that ET epinephrine administration remains an alternative to IV administered epinephrine and faster at restoring ROSC among pediatric hypovolemic cardiac arrest victims in the acute setting when an endotracheal tube is present. Although further research is required to determine long-term outcomes of high-dose ET epinephrine administration, these data reinforce the therapeutic potential of ET administration of epinephrine to restore ROSC before IV access.

Pharmacokinetic effects of endotracheal, intraosseous, and intravenous epinephrine in a swine model of traumatic cardiac arrest

IntroductionLimited prospective data exist regarding epinephrine's controversial role in managing traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). This study compared the maximum concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), plasma concentration over time, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to ROSC, and odds of ROSC of epinephrine administered by the endotracheal (ETT), intraosseous (IO), and intravenous (IV) routes in a swine TCA model. MethodsForty-nine Yorkshire-cross swine were assigned to seven groups: ETT, tibial IO (TIO), sternal IO (SIO), humeral IO (HIO), IV, CPR with defibrillation (CPRD), and CPR only. Swine were exsanguinated 31% of their blood volume and cardiac arrest induced. Chest compressions began 2 min post-arrest. At 4 min post-arrest, 1 mg epinephrine was administered, and blood specimens collected over 4 min. Resuscitation continued until ROSC or 30 min elapsed. ResultsThe Cmax of IV epinephrine was significantly higher than the TIO group (P = 0.049). No other differences in Cmax, Tmax, ROSC, and time to ROSC existed between the epinephrine groups (P > 0.05). Epinephrine levels were detectable in two of seven ETT swine. No significant difference in ROSC existed between the epinephrine groups and CPRD group (P > 0.05). Significant differences in ROSC existed between all groups and the CPR only group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in odds of ROSC were noted. ConclusionsThe pharmacokinetics of IV, HIO, and SIO epinephrine were comparable. Endotracheal epinephrine absorption was highly variable and unreliable compared to IV and IO epinephrine. Epinephrine appeared to have a lesser role than volume replacement in resuscitating TCA.

Bioavailability of endotracheal epinephrine in an ovine model of neonatal resuscitation.

Distressed infants in the delivery room and those that have completed postnatal transition are both resuscitated according to established neonatal resuscitation guidelines, often with endotracheal (ET) epinephrine at the same dose. We hypothesized that ET epinephrine would have higher bioavailability in a post-transitional compared to transitioning newborn model due to absence of fetal lung liquid and intra-cardiac shunts. 15 term fetal (transitioning newborn) and 6 postnatal lambs were asphyxiated by umbilical cord and ET tube occlusion respectively. Lambs were resuscitated after 5 min of asystole. ET epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered after 1 min of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and chest compressions, and repeated 3 min later, followed by intravenous (IV) epinephrine (0.03 mg/kg) every 3 min until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Serial plasma epinephrine concentrations were measured. Peak plasma epinephrine concentrations were lower in transitioning newborns as compared to postnatal lambs: after a single ET dose (145.36 ± 135.5 ng/ml vs 553.54 ± 215 ng/ml, p < 0.01) and after two ET doses (443 ± 192.49 ng/ml vs 1406 ± 420.8 ng/ml, p < 0.01). The rates of ROSC with a single ET dose were similar in both groups (40% vs 50% in newborn and postnatal respectively, p > 0.99). There was a higher incidence of post-ROSC tachycardia and increased carotid blood flow in the postnatal group. In the postnatal period, ET epinephrine at currently recommended doses resulted in higher peak epinephrine concentrations, post-ROSC tachycardia and cerebral reperfusion without significant differences in incidence of ROSC. Further studies evaluating the optimal dose of ET epinephrine during the postnatal period are warranted.

Current Challenges in Neonatal Resuscitation: What is the Role of Adrenaline?

Adrenaline, also known as epinephrine, is a hormone, neurotransmitter, and medication. It is the best established drug in neonatal resuscitation, but only weak evidence supports current recommendations for its use. Furthermore, the available evidence is partly based on extrapolations from adult studies, and this introduces further uncertainty, especially when considering the unique physiological characteristics of newly born infants. The timing, dose, and route of administration of adrenaline are still debated, even though this medication has been used in neonatal resuscitation for a long time. According to the most recent Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines from the American Heart Association, adrenaline use is indicated when the heart rate remains < 60 beats per minute despite the establishment of adequate ventilation with 100% oxygen and chest compressions. The aforementioned guidelines recommend intravenous administration (via an umbilical venous catheter) of adrenaline at a dose of 0.01-0.03mg/kg (1:10,000 concentration). Endotracheal administration of a higher dose (0.05-0.1mg/kg) may be considered while venous access is being obtained, even if supportive data for endotracheal adrenaline are lacking. The safety and efficacy of intraosseous administration of adrenaline remain to be investigated. This article reviews the evidence on the circulatory effects and tolerability of adrenaline in the newborn, discusses literature data on adrenaline use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and describes international recommendations and outcome data regarding the use of this medication during neonatal resuscitation.

Endotracheal adrenaline use a newborn with pulmonary hemorrhage: A case report

Pulmonary hemorrhage in the newborn is an acute and idiopathic event characterized by discharge of bloody fluid from the respiratory tract or endotracheal tube. In this case report we discussed 5 hours old neonate with pulmonary bleeding. We showed that endotracheal adrenaline use, gastric lavage with cold water and use of vitamin K in the treatment of neonates with pulmonary bleeding might shorten the duration of treatment and lower the mortality rate.

Legal Briefs: Extremely Preterm Infant, Pronounced Dead, Comes to Life, But Outcome Is Compromised

A 233/7 weeks’, 592-g female infant was born to a 19-year-old-mother with a benign prenatal course until the development of preterm labor. When contractions began, the mother was hospitalized and received tocolysis and a full course of antenatal corticosteroids. After 3 days of hospitalization, the membranes spontaneously ruptured, labor progressed, and her footling breech fetus was delivered by emergency cesarean section. The neonatologist discussed medical intervention, comfort care, and data on mortality and morbidity in infants of similar gestation with the parents before delivery. The parents wanted resuscitation and full medical intervention after birth if the estimated gestational age and birth weight before birth were validated after delivery and if no unforeseen findings that would alter the outcome appeared. The fetal heart rate (HR) pattern was unremarkable, with the fetal HR being 145 beats per minute immediately before birth. At delivery, the infant had a similar HR, palpable pulses, and respiratory effort. At 30 seconds after birth, a 2.5-mm endotracheal tube (ETT) was inserted through which positive pressure ventilation was started because the respiratory effort was weak. The HR decreased to 58 beats per minute at 1 minute at which point chest compressions were initiated. Two rounds of endotracheal epinephrine via ETT were given because of a HR that continued to decrease. At 11 …

Massive pulmonary hemorrhage in enterovirus 71-infected hand, foot, and mouth disease.

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute, mostly self-limiting infection. Patients usually recover without any sequelae. However, a few cases are life threatening, especially those caused by enterovirus 71 (EV71). A 12-month-old boy was admitted to a primary hospital with high fever and vesicular lesions of the mouth, hands, and feet. After 3 days, he experienced 3 seizure episodes and was referred to our hospital. On admission, he was conscious and his chest radiograph was normal. However, 6 hours later, he suddenly lost consciousness and had developed a massive pulmonary hemorrhage that continued until his death. He experienced several more intermittent seizures, and diffuse infiltration of both lung fields was observed on chest radiography. Intravenous immunoglobulin, dexamethasone, cefotaxime, leukocyte-depleted red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, inotropics, vitamin K, and endotracheal epinephrine were administered. The patient died 9 hours after intubation, within 3 days from fever onset. EV71 subgenotype C4a was isolated retrospectively from serum and nasopharyngeal swab by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Here, we report a fatal case of EV71-associated HFMD with sudden-onset massive pulmonary hemorrhage and suspected encephalitis.

Endotracheal adrenaline in cardiac arrest due to near-fatal asthma: a case study

A case report of respiratory arrest in a patient with an out-of-hospital, near fatal asthma (NFA) attack; successfully resuscitated with treatment that included endotracheal adrenaline is described. This report demonstrates that endotracheal epinephrine (adrenaline may have a role in the resuscitation of asphyxic asthma. Adrenaline is a recognised β2 agonist and its smooth muscle relaxation properties are known to reverse bronchospasm. Ventilating patients with severe bronchospasm resulting from asphyxic asthma is known to be difficult. This report shows that instilling adrenaline via the endotracheal tube to a patient in cardio-respiratory arrest, resulted in relief of bronchospasm, reduction in airways resistance and a subsequent improvement of the operator's ability to ventilate.

Part 15: Neonatal Resuscitation

The following guidelines are an interpretation of the evidence presented in the 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations 1 ). They apply primarily to newly born infants undergoing transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life, but the recommendations are also applicable to neonates who have completed perinatal transition and require resuscitation during the first few weeks to months following birth. Practitioners who resuscitate infants at birth or at any time during the initial hospital admission should consider following these guidelines. For the purposes of these guidelines, the terms newborn and neonate are intended to apply to any infant during the initial hospitalization. The term newly born is intended to apply specifically to an infant at the time of birth. Approximately 10% of newborns require some assistance to begin breathing at birth. Less than 1% require extensive resuscitative measures. 2,3 Although the vast majority of newly born infants do not require intervention to make the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life, because of the large total number of births, a sizable number will require some degree of resuscitation. Those newly born infants who do not require resuscitation can generally be identified by a rapid assessment of the following 3 characteristics: ● Term gestation? ● Crying or breathing? ● Good muscle tone? If the answer to all 3 of these questions is “yes,” the baby does not need resuscitation and should not be separated from the mother. The baby should be dried, placed skin-to-skin with the mother, and covered with dry linen to maintain temperature. Observation of breathing, activity, and color should be ongoing. If the answer to any of these assessment questions is “no,” the infant should receive one or more of the following 4 categories of action in sequence:

BET 2 IS ENDOTRACHEAL ADRENALINE USEFUL IN ACUTE ASTHMA?

There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of endotracheal adrenaline in patients with respiratory arrest secondary to asthma.

BET 3. ENDOTRACHEAL ADRENALINE IN INTUBATED PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA

BET 3. ENDOTRACHEAL ADRENALINE IN INTUBATED PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA

Use and Efficacy of Endotracheal Versus Intravenous Epinephrine During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery Room

Use and Efficacy of Endotracheal Versus Intravenous Epinephrine During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery Room

Use and Efficacy of Endotracheal Versus Intravenous Epinephrine During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Delivery Room

Given the paucity of information regarding endotracheal epinephrine for newborn resuscitation, the objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the frequency of endotracheal epinephrine use in newborns in the delivery room, and (2) to determine whether the previously recommended dose of 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg of endotracheal epinephrine is effective in establishing a return of spontaneous circulation. A retrospective review was conducted for all neonates who received > or = 1 dose of epinephrine in the delivery room between January 1999 and December 2004. Infants who received > or = 1 dose of endotracheal epinephrine in the delivery room during resuscitation were included in the study population whether or not they survived to be admitted to the NICU. Exclusion criteria included lethal congenital anomalies, delivery outside the hospital, and missing medical charts. Of 93,656 infants, 52 neonates (0.06%) received epinephrine in the delivery room, 5 of whom met exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 47 infants, 44 (94%) received the first dose via the endotracheal tube. Only 14 (32%) of 44 achieved return of spontaneous circulation after endotracheal tube administration of epinephrine. Of the 30 remaining infants, 23 (77%) had return of spontaneous circulation with intravenous epinephrine after initially failing endotracheal tube epinephrine. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between newborns who responded to endotracheal tube versus intravenous epinephrine except for a lower blood glucose on NICU admission (52 vs 113 mg%). Endotracheal epinephrine is frequently used when intensive resuscitation is required in the delivery room. The previously recommended endotracheal epinephrine dose of 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg is often ineffective. Higher endotracheal doses will likely be needed to improve efficacy. A prospective study is needed to determine the best endotracheal epinephrine dosing regimen. Until such information is available, intravenous administration should be the preferred route of delivery.