Endothelial Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Research Articles

Phase 2 trial of regorafenib in recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma.

There is a significant need for effective therapies to treat recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). This study evaluated the multi-targeted, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regorafenib in patients with R/M ACC. Patients with progressive R/M ACC were treated with regorafenib until disease progression, consent withdrawal, or excessive toxicity. The primary endpoints were best overall response (BOR) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Genomic and transcriptomic biomarker analyses were performed in tumors from trial participants. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, including 7 (18%) patients with prior VEGFR-TKIs. No objective responses were observed. Six-month PFS was 45%, and median PFS was 7.2 months (95%CI 5.2-11.9 months). Presence of either activating NOTCH1 (22%) or KDM6A alterations (24%) was associated with decreased PFS (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.1-6.1, p=0.03). Bulk RNA sequencing of pre-treatment tumors revealed that regorafenib clinical benefit (CB; PFS≥6 months; n=11) was associated with native enrichment of immune-related signatures. Immune deconvolution revealed a greater degree of macrophage and T-cell infiltration in CB tumors. Tumors from patients with no clinical benefit (NCB; PFS<6 months; n=9) had greater expression of signatures related to cell cycle progression (E2F targets, G2/M checkpoint). The trial failed to meet the pre-specified 6-month PFS and BOR targets. We hypothesize that TKI efficacy may be reliant upon an interplay between kinase inhibition and the ACC immune microenvironment, while programs promoting cell cycle progression may contribute to TKI resistance. These observations suggest that trials evaluating CDK4/6 inhibition plus a VEGFR-TKI should be considered.

Hypertension toxicity of VEGFR-TKIs in cancer treatment: incidence, mechanisms, and management strategies.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) are a class of targeted anticancer agents that include pazopanib, sunitinib, axitinib, and others. Currently, VEGFR-TKIs are widely used in the clinical treatment of various tumors, which can prolong patients' survival and even cure tumors. However, the use of VEGFR-TKIs is frequently associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events, with hypertension being the most prevalent. Hypertension and its complications can significantly impact the prognosis of patients, potentially jeopardizing their lives and resulting in the reduction or even cessation of treatment in severe cases. This review addresses the incidence of hypertension due to VEGFR-TKIs, mechanisms of toxicity, management strategies, and future research directions. In addition, hypertension due to VEGFR-TKIs may be associated with salt sensitivity, and possible mechanisms of hypertensive side effects are vasodilator imbalance, decreased capillary density, renal injury, impaired endothelial function due to oxidative stress, decreased lymphatic vascular density, and "off-target effect". A comprehensive understanding of hypertension toxicity due to cancer treatment with VEGFR-TKIs, can enhance clinical practice, thereby improving the prognostic outcomes of VEGFR-TKIs in oncology patients.

Tivozanib plus nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma following an immune checkpoint inhibitor: results of the phase 3 TiNivo-2 Study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are cornerstones of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, optimal treatment sequencing after progression is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of tivozanib-nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy in the post-ICI setting. TiNivo-2 is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 190 sites across 16 countries, in Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and progression during or after one to two previous lines of therapy (including one ICI) were randomised 1:1 to tivozanib (0·89 mg per day, orally) plus nivolumab (480 mg every 4 weeks, intravenously) or tivozanib (1·34 mg per day, orally). Randomisation was stratified by immediate previous therapy (ICI or non-ICI) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk category. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to first documentation of objective progressive disease according to RECIST 1·1 or death from any cause, whichever came first, by independent radiology review. Efficacy was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04987203) and is active and not recruiting. From Nov 4, 2021, to June 16, 2023, 343 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib-nivolumab (n=171) or tivozanib monotherapy (n=172). Median follow-up was 12·0 months. Median PFS was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-7·4) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 7·4 months (5·6-9·2) with tivozanib monotherapy (hazard ratio 1·10, 95% CI 0·84-1·43; p=0·49). Among those with an ICI as their immediate previous therapy (n=244), median PFS was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6-9·6) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 9·2 months (7·4-10·0) with tivozanib monotherapy. With non-ICIs as the most recent therapy, lower median PFS was observed, with no difference between groups (tivozanib-nivolumab 3·7 months [95% CI 2·7-5·4] and with tivozanib monotherapy 3·7 months [1·9-7·2]). Serious adverse events occurred in 54 (32%) of 168 patients receiving tivozanib-nivolumab and 64 (37%) of 171 patients receiving tivozanib monotherapy. One (<1%) treatment-related death occurred (tivozanib group). These data further support that ICI rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, these data suggest that tivozanib monotherapy has efficacy in the post-ICI setting. Aveo Pharmaceuticals.

Pembrolizumab and Cabozantinib in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-term Survival Update with a Biomarker Analysis.

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy is a standard of care in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) have immunomodulatory properties and improve clinical outcomes in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in different malignancies. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab and cabozantinib in patients with RMHNSCC and include a correlative biomarker analysis. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study screened 50 patients with RMHNSCC, of whom 36 received pembrolizumab and cabozantinib. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), safety, and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and correlative studies of tissue and blood. We report the long-term PFS, OS, and safety of treated patients and describe correlative biomarkers evaluating p-MET expression and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) using multiplex immunohistochemistry. With median follow-up of 22.4 months, the median PFS was 12.8 months with a 2-year PFS of 32.6% (95% CI, 18.8%-56.3%) and the median OS was 27.7 months with a 2-year OS of 54.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 38.9%-76.8%]. The median duration of response was 12.6 months with a 2-year rate of 38.5% (95% CI, 30.8%-81.8%). Long-term treatment-related adverse events included manageable hypothyroidism (5.5%) and grade 1 elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (2.8%). Baseline tumor p-MET expression correlated with ORR (P = 0.0055). Higher density of CD8+, CD103+, and CSF1-R+ cells at baseline correlated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.27, P = 0.030; HR = 8.79, P = 0.017; HR = 6.87, P = 0.040, respectively]. Pembrolizumab and cabozantinib provided prolonged encouraging long-term disease control and survival with a maintained favorable safety profile. The prognostic significance of higher density of CD8+, CD103+, and CSF1-R+ cells in TIME deserve further evaluation in similar clinical settings.

Approaches to Treating High Risk and Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Key Trial Data That Impacts Treatment Decisions in the Clinic.

The treatment paradigm for high risk localized and advanced kidney cancer has been characterized by ongoing changes, with the introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) and later with immune checkpoint blockade. In this article, we review how current evidence informs our decision-making on post-checkpoint inhibitor systemic therapies, the role of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapies, and the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the evolving systemic therapy landscape. While some studies support a post-checkpoint inhibitor benefit from the VEGFR TKIs cabozantinib or axitinib, the benefit of doublet therapies including a VEGF receptor inhibitor and a checkpoint inhibitor remains an area of active investigation, with the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showing promise but with a Phase III trial of the combination of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib showing no benefit over cabozantinib alone. The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk disease who have undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy and potentially metastasectomy is also an area of continuing interest. While the S-TRAC study demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit for adjuvant sunitinib, no overall survival benefit was shown, and multiple other studies of adjuvant VEGFR TKI therapy have been negative. Subsequently, adjuvant pembrolizumab has shown a benefit in overall survival, whereas trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab have all been negative. Finally, the role for cytoreductive nephrectomy continues to be an area of active debate. The CARMENA study raised important questions about the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy given the advances in VEGFR TKI therapy but was characterized by accrual difficulties and a significant number of patients not receiving treatment according to the study protocol. Two ongoing studies (NORDIC-SUN and PROBE) seek to further address the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the doublet therapy era.

Single-arm study of camrelizumab plus apatinib for patients with advanced mucosal melanoma

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested the potential synergistic antitumor activity when combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents in various solid tumors. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of...

Increase in blood pressure in patients with metastatic kidney cancer treated with combination checkpoint inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

e24128 Background: The combination therapy of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) is considered a first line treatment option for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). TKI-induced hypertension is a well-known potential side effect with VEGFR-TKIs however little is known about the real-world increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in patients with and without underlying hypertension treated with this combination therapy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed that included patients with metastatic ccRCC who were treated at the University of Florida Health Cancer Center between June 2019 and September 2022 who received treatment with the combination of an ICI and VEGFR-TKI. The data collected included history of hypertension, patients use of anti-hypertensive therapy at baseline, SBP and DBP prior to initiation of therapy and at approximately one month after initiation of treatment. Results: We identified a total of 29 patients who met the inclusion criteria for our study. The median age was 68 years old (IQR 61-72) while 25 patients (86%) were male and 4 (14%) were females. There were 27 patients (93%) who were treated with axitinib with pembrolizumab, while 1 (3%) was treated with cabozantinib with nivolumab, and 1 (3%) was treated with lenvatinib with pembrolizumab. Out of the 29 patients, 11 (38%) did not have hypertension prior to therapy while 18 (62%) did have baseline hypertension and were receiving at least one anti-hypertensive treatment. In those patients without baseline hypertension, the median baseline SBP was 113 and the median SBP after one month of treatment was 144 (p = 0.01). Conversely, those patients with baseline hypertension, the median baseline SBP was 122 and median SBP after one month of treatment was 148 (p = 0.003). In those without hypertension at baseline, the mean SBP increase after one month was 27.3% while in those with baseline hypertension the mean increase in SBP of 17.0%. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that in a real-world population of patients with metastatic ccRCC there is a statistically significant elevation of both SBP and DBP when treated with the combination of an ICI and VEGFR-TKI and that in those patients without baseline hypertension and not on anti-hypertensive therapy at baseline, there is a more pronounced increase in blood pressure. This data should reinforce the need to have close monitoring of SBP and DBP during therapy, regardless of whether the patient has underlying hypertension or not, and may help guide anti-hypertensive therapy during kidney cancer treatment.

The efficacy of subsequent therapy after failure of anti-PD-1 antibody in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The optional regimens of subsequent therapy after failure of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remain to be explored. There are reports of the efficacy of single-agent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) in patients with mRCC after failure of anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. However, it is not clear whether it is beneficial for patients to receive anti-PD-1 antibody as post-progression treatment. It has great significance to explore whether continuous application of anti-PD-1 antibody is beneficial for patients with mRCC whose diseases progressed to the state of pre-anti-PD-1 therapy. The purposes of this study are to explore the efficacy and safety of subsequent treatment on whether to continue using anti-PD-1 antibody therapy for patients who have progressive mRCC after prior treatment with anti-PD-1 antibody. The clinical data of patients with mRCC from the Department of Immunotherapy in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital from February 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were estimated with Fisher's exact test. PFS and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. The associations between potential prognostic variables and PFS were evaluated with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A P value of less than or equal to 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. A total of 35 patients were included in this study, during which 19 received VEGFR-TKI monotherapy and 16 received the VEGFR-TKI plus anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Until the last follow-up on June 30, 2022, 19 patients experienced progressive disease (PD), five were in remission, and 11 kept stable disease (SD). After a median follow-up of 28.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0-35.6] months, the median PFS (mPFS) was 11.6 months for the VEGFR-TKI group and 9.1 months for the VEGFR-TKI plus anti-PD-1 antibody group [hazard ratio (HR) =0.81, 95% CI: 0.32-1.03, P=0.44]. Median OS (mOS) were 16.9 and 11.2 months respectively (HR =0.99, 95% CI: 0.44-2.27, P=0.90). The ORRs were 26.3% and 0% (P=0.049), and the DCRs were 47.4% and 43.8% (P=0.55) respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 patients (73.7%) in the VEGFR-TKI group and 14 patients (87.5%) in the VEGFR-TKI plus anti-PD-1 antibody group (P=0.42); grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in two patients (10.5%) and six patients (37.5%) respectively (P=0.11). VEGFR-TKI monotherapy is an efficacious regimen for patients with mRCC whose diseases progressed on previous anti-PD-1 antibody therapy, and continuous anti-PD-1 therapy after failure of anti-PD-1 antibody could not provide additional clinical benefit but increased the incidence of TRAEs.

Analysis of Response and Progression Patterns of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two KCSG Phase II Trials.

In this study, we evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) enrolled in two Korean Cancer Study Group trials to investigate the response and progression patterns in recurrent and/or metastatic ACC treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). We evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with ACC who were enrolled in the Korean Cancer Study Group trials. The tumor measurements, clinical data, treatment outcomes, and progression patterns of therapy were analyzed. In the 66 patients (53 receiving axitinib and 13 receiving nintedanib), the disease control rate was 61%, and three patients achieved partial response. The median follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and 6-month PFS rate were 27.6%, 12.4%, and 18.1% months and 62.1%, respectively. Among 42 patients who experienced progression, 27 (64.3%) showed target lesion progression. Bone metastasis was an independent poor prognostic factor. Overall, most patients demonstrated stable disease with prolonged PFS; however, prominent target lesion progression occurred in some patients. Thus, PFS may capture VEGFR-TKI efficacy better than the objective response rate.

Synthesis of Bis-thiazoles Tethered 1,4-Dihydropyridine and Pyridine Linkers via Simple Oxidation and their Molecular Docking as VEGFR -TK Inhibitors.

In this study, a neoteric and expedient oxidation method is applied for a variety of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives such as 1,4-dihydro- 2,6-dimethyl-3,5-diacetylpyridine, 3,5-bis-hydrazono--2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine, and 3,5-bis-thiazoly-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydro pyridine. This simple oxidation is based upon the in situ generation of nitrous acid from an aqueous sodium nitrite and acetic acid mixture and could be used to downgrade costs, sustain resources, and minimize chemical wastes. Also, a molecular modeling strategy was used to study the mechanism of action for various derivatives of bis-hydrazinylidene- thiazole as the protein Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (VEGFR TK) inhibitor through evaluating their binding scores and modes compared with Sorafenib as a reference standard. The results revealed that the interaction of hydrazinylidene and thiazole as an anticancer Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor has been improved. Additionally, the compounds exhibiting the highest activity were assessed for their potential anticancer effects against HepG-2, MCF-7, and WI-38 cells, and the outcomes demonstrated encouraging activity against cancer.

Avelumab Plus Intermittent Axitinib in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. The Tide-A Phase 2 Study

Background and ObjectiveCombinations of VEGFR-TKIs plus ICI against PD1/PD-L1 are the standard first-line therapy for patients with mRCC, irrespective of the prognostic class. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of withdrawing the VEGFR-TKI but continuing the anti- PD1/PD-L1 in patients who achieve response to their combination. MethodsThis was a single-arm phase 2 trial in patients with treatment naïve mRCC with prior nephrectomy, without symptomatic/bulky disease and no liver metastases. Enrolled patients received axitinib+avelumab, after 36 weeks of therapy those who achieved tumor response interrupted axitinib and continued avelumab maintenance until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients without progression eight weeks after the axitinib interruption. Secondary endpoints were the median value for progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) and the safety in the overall population. Key Findings and Limitations79 patients were enrolled and 75 evaluated for efficacy. A total of 29 (38%) patients had axitinib withdrawn, as per the study design, with 72% of them having no progression after eight weeks and thus achieving the primary endpoint. The mPFS of the overall population was 24 months while the mOS was not reached. The ORR was 76% (12% CR, 64% PR), with 19% of patients having stable disease. In the patients who discontinued axitinib, the incidence of AEs of any grade was 59% and 3% for grade 3 or 4. This study was limited by the lack of the comparative arm. Conclusions and Clinical ImplicationsThe TIDE-A study demonstrates that the withdrawal of VEGFR-TKI with ICI maintenance is feasible for selected mRCC patients with evidence of response to the VEGFR-TKI+ICI combination employed in first-line therapy. Axitinib interruption with avelumab maintenance led to decreased side effects and should be further investigated as a new strategy to delay tumor progression.

Current Status and Future Direction in the Treatment of Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

To provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and developments in the treatment options for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), focusing on the strategies utilized for advanced disease. Research has delved into the genomic landscape of ACC, revealing potential targets for therapy. Despite the failure of inhibitors aimed at the insulin like growth factor 1(IGF-1) receptor, other approaches, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEFGR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, are being investigated. There are also ongoing trials of combination treatments such as lenvatinib with pembrolizumab and cabozantinib with atezolizumab. ACC remains a challenging malignancy with limited effective treatment options. Although EDP-M stands as the frontline treatment, the search for effective second-line therapies is ongoing. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies, especially in combination regimens, are demonstrating potential and are the subject of continued research. The evolving genomic landscape emphasizes the significance of targeted therapies and the need for further in-depth studies to solidify effective treatment regimens for ACC.

Cardiovascular disease burden in patients with urological cancers: The new discipline of uro-cardio-oncology.

Cancer remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, and urological cancers are the most common cancers among men. Several therapeutic agents have been used to treat urological cancer, leading to improved survival for patients. However, this has been accompanied by an increase in the frequency of survivors with cardiovascular complications caused by anticancer medications. Here, we propose the novel discipline of uro-cardio-oncology, an evolving subspecialty focused on the complex interactions between cardiovascular disease and urological cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the various cardiovascular toxicities induced by different classes of antineoplastic agents used to treat urological cancers, including androgen deprivation therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chemotherapeutics. In addition, we discuss possible mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular toxicity associated with anticancer therapy and outline strategies for the surveillance, diagnosis, and effective management of cardiovascular complications. Finally, we provide an analysis of future perspectives in this emerging specialty, identifying areas in need of further research.

Development and validation of a tumor tissue based multivariate biomarker for predicting angiogenesis inhibitor clinical benefit in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

467 Background: Angiogenesis inhibitors, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), are standard of care therapy (alone and in combination) for several advanced cancers, including RCC. There is an unmet need for a biomarker to identify patients with RCC most likely to benefit from VEGFR TKIs to guide individualized treatment decision making. Hence, we sought to develop and validate a biomarker for predicting single-agent systemic VEGFR TKI benefit in patients with RCC. Methods: Candidate biomarkers were selected by co-expression patterns in VEGFR TKI sensitive/resistant tumor types from pan-solid tumor TCGA expression profiling data and the literature. The angiogenesis inhibitor treatment response score (Angio TRS) was developed as a multivariate expression-based algorithm from RNA-based quantitative transcriptional profiling (qTP) performed in parallel with clinical FFPE tumor based comprehensive genomic profiling, with the Angio TRS High/Low threshold set at the median of clear cell RCC samples. The locked Angio TRS (and High/Low status) was then validated in a cohort of adult RCC patients treated with a systemic line of single agent VEGFR TKI therapy within a prospective observational trial; group outcomes (by time to next therapy [TTNT]) were compared by univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling (adjusting for age, biologic sex, histology, nuclear grade [incorporating sarcomatoid features], therapy line, and TKI type), and unadjusted Kaplan Meier analysis. Laboratory information for IMDC risk group status was not available. Results: Across 3,721 solid tumor tissue samples, median Angio TRS was highest in known VEGFR TKI sensitive tumors (RCC, thyroid carcinoma, sarcoma). Angio TRS was then validated in a separate cohort of 86 patients with RCC treated with single agent systemic VEGFR TKI (median follow-up 29.2 months; 76% male, 77% clear cell, 14% with sarcomatoid features, 84% 1st line, and 71% treated with sunitinib, pazopanib or axitinib); 52% of patients were Angio TRS High. By univariate analysis, Angio TRS status (p=0.008) and nuclear grade 4 (with or without sarcomatoid features; p=0.06 &amp; 0.07) were most significantly associated with VEGFR TKI TTNT; by multivariate analysis, only Angio TRS status was significantly associated with TTNT (High vs. Low median TTNT 15.8 vs. 5.6 months, adjusted hazard ratio 0.46, p=0.012). Conclusions: Angio TRS is a multivariate expression-based algorithm performed on FFPE tumor tissue, validated to be prognostic of clinical outcome for patients with RCC treated with single agent VEGFR TKI when controlling for clinical factors. Angio TRS may support individualized treatment decision making in patients with advanced RCC. Additional independent validation in a cohort of Kaiser Permanente patients will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03061305 .

Long-Term Survival in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Tivozanib: Analysis of the Phase III TIVO-3 Trial.

Tivozanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Long-term exploratory analyses from the TIVO-3 trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) RCC including patients (26%) with prior immuno-oncology (IO) therapy are reported. Patients with R/R advanced RCC that progressed with 2 or 3 prior systemic therapies (≥1 VEGFR TKI) were randomized to tivozanib 1.5 mg QD or sorafenib 400 mg BID, stratified by IMDC risk and previous therapy. Safety, investigator-assessed long-term progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and serial overall survival (OS) were assessed. Mean time on treatment was 11.0 months with tivozanib (n = 175) and 6.3 months with sorafenib (n = 175). Fewer grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred with tivozanib (46%) than sorafenib (55%). Dose modification rates were lower with tivozanib than sorafenib across age/prior IO subgroups; prior IO therapy did not impact dose reductions or discontinuations in either arm. Landmark LT-PFS rates were higher with tivozanib (3 years: 12.3% vs 2.4%; 4 years: 7.6% vs 0%). After 22.8 months mean follow-up, the OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.14); when conditioned on 12-month landmark PFS, tivozanib showed significant OS improvement over sorafenib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; 2-sided P = .0221). Tivozanib demonstrated a consistent safety profile and long-term survival benefit in patients with R/R advanced RCC who were alive and progression free at 12 months. These post hoc exploratory analyses of LT-PFS and conditional OS support a clinically meaningful improvement with tivozanib versus sorafenib in this advanced RCC population.

Mechanisms of tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most prevalent type of kidney cancer, is a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are among the first-line treatment options for patients with advanced RCC. These therapies target the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase pathway and other kinases crucial to cancer proliferation, survival, and metastasis. TKIs have yielded substantial improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced RCC. However, nearly all patients eventually progress on these drugs as resistance develops. This review provides an overview of TKI resistance in RCC and explores different mechanisms of resistance, including upregulation of alternative proangiogenic pathways, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), decreased intracellular drug concentrations due to efflux pumps and lysosomal sequestration, alterations in the tumor microenvironment including bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) and tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs), and genetic factors such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms opens the door to the development of innovative therapeutic approaches that can effectively overcome TKI resistance, thereby improving outcomes for patients with advanced RCC.

Cediranib ameliorates portal hypertensive syndrome via inhibition of VEGFR-2 signaling in cirrhotic rats

Portal hypertension (PHT) is a syndrome caused by systemic and portal hemodynamic disturbances with the progression of cirrhosis. However, the exact mechanisms regulating angiogenesis-related responses in PHT remain unclear. Cediranib is a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinases, exhibiting a greater affinity for VEGFR-2. Liver cirrhosis was induced by common bile duct ligation (BDL) in Sprague–Dawley rats. Sham-operated rats were controls. BDL and sham rats were randomly allocated to receive Cediranib or vehicle after BDL. On the 28th day, portal hypertension related parameters were surveyed. Cediranib treatment could significantly reduce the portal pressure (PP) in BDL rats, while it did not affect the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in sham groups and BDL groups. Cediranib treatment could significantly affect the stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) flow and SMA resistance in BDL groups and BDL with Cediranib groups. Cediranib treatment could improve the mesenteric vascular remodeling and contractility. Cediranib treatment significantly reduced mesenteric vascular density. And phospho-VEGFR-2 was significantly downregulated by Cediranib. On the other hand, phospho-endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthases (phospho-eNOS) expressions were upregulated. Cediranib not only improved splanchnic hemodynamics, extrahepatic vascular remodeling and vasodilation, but also alleviated intrahepatic fibrosis and collagen deposition significantly. Cediranib treatment could reduce intrahepatic angiogenesis between BDL-vehicle and BDL-Cediranib rats. In conclusion, Cediranib could improve extrahepatic hyperdynamic circulation by inhibiting extrahepatic angiogenesis through inhibition of the VEGFR-2 signaling pathway, portal collateral circulation formation, as well as eNOS-mediated vasodilatation and vascular remodeling, and at the same time, Cediranib improved intrahepatic fibrogenesis and angiogenesis, which together alleviate cirrhotic PHT syndrome.

A ligand-independent Tie2-activating antibody reduces vascular leakage in models of Clarkson disease.

Vascular dysfunction resulting from endothelial hyperpermeability is a common and important feature of critical illness due to sepsis, trauma, and other conditions associated with acute systemic inflammation. Clarkson disease [monoclonal gammopathy-associated idiopathic systemic capillary leak syndrome (ISCLS)] is a rare, orphan disorder marked by spontaneous and recurrent episodes of hypotensive shock and peripheral edema due to widespread vascular leakage in peripheral tissues. Mortality from acute flares approaches 30% due to lack of effective therapies. We evaluated a monoclonal antibody (4E2) specific for the endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2 in ISCLS models. 4E2 activated Tie2 in ISCLS patient-derived endothelial cells and reduced baseline and proinflammatory mediator-induced barrier dysfunction. 4E2 also reduced mortality and/or vascular leakage associated with systemic histamine challenge or influenza infection in the SJL/J mouse model of ISCLS. These findings support a critical role for Tie2 dysregulation in ISCLS and highlight a viable therapeutic approach to this catastrophic disorder.

Cardiovascular events following vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor therapy with sunitinib or pazopanib in patients with renal cell carcinoma - a nationwide registry-based follow-up study

Abstract Background Use of oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with focus on sunitinib and pazopanib approved for treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may be associated with cardiovascular events. However, there are limited data on the risk related to treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with RCC treated with sunitinib and pazopanib compared with age- and sex-matched population control subjects without cancer (1:2 ratio). Methods Patients with RCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib from 2011 through 2018 were identified within the Danish National Patient Registry. Multivariable Cox regression standardized to the age, sex, selected comorbidity and pharmacotherapy distributions of all included subjects were used to derive absolute one-year risks of selected cardiovascular events. Results A total of 3,642 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 1,214 had RCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib, and 2,428 were population control subjects without cancer. Differences in age, sex, prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral artery disease were insignificant (all P&amp;gt;0.05), whereas patients with RCC more frequently had prior hypertension (51.2% vs. 35.2%), diabetes (17.1% vs. 10.3%), and transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke (7% vs. 4.5%), all P&amp;lt;0.05. Absolute risk of ACS was 1.4% for patients with RCC vs. 1.0% for controls (P=0.54), stroke/TIA 1.7% vs. 0.8% (P=0.10), and ventricular arrhythmia 0.3% vs. 0.1% (P=0.70). In contrast, risk of hypertension was significantly elevated with 50.7% vs. 41.8% for patients with RRC vs. controls (P&amp;lt;0.001), and this risk was similarly elevated when excluding patients with prior hypertension (30.7% vs. 5.4%, P&amp;lt;0.001). Similarly, risks of atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) with 5.6% vs. 2.8% (P&amp;lt;0.001) and heart failure (HF) with 0.7% vs. 0.3% (P&amp;lt;0.001) were significantly elevated in patients with RCC versus controls.Risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 5.6% vs. 0.9% (P&amp;lt;0.001) for patients with RCC versus controls. All-cause mortality risk was 40.1% vs. 2.6% (P&amp;lt;0.001). The corresponding relative risks for one-year outcomes are shown in Figure 1. Conclusions Patients with RCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib did not have a significantly higher risk of ACS, stroke/TIA or ventricular arrhythmia when compared to age- and sex-matched controls. In contrast, risks of hypertension, AF, HF, and VTE at 1 year compared with population control subjects were significantly elevated. Risk of HF risk was however limited in absolute numbers and the clinical significance of the evaluated risk of this endpoint as well as other endpoints should be interpreted in the context of a significantly high 1-year mortality risk of around 40% in patients with RCC versus only around 2.5% in population controls.Figure 1

Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: A better response evaluation criteria for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after bevacizumab treatment.

Cavitation of lesions is common in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-squamous-NSCLC) patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFRIs). However, traditional response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) do not take cavitation into consideration and may no longer be accurate for potentially reflecting the real clinical efficacy of anti-vessel growth therapy. Here, we aimed to optimize the traditional RECIST version 1.1 by adding cavitation into the evaluation criteria. We performed a post-hoc radiologic review of 517 patients in a phase III clinical trial of bevacizumab biosimilar (SIBP04) combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-squamous NSCLC. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST1.1 and mRECIST criteria (modified RECIST, a novel alternate method where the longest diameter of the cavity was subtracted from the overall longest diameter of that lesion to measure target lesions), respectively, and correlated with clinical outcomes. Cavitations of pulmonary lesions were seen in nine (2%) patients at baseline, and 97 (19%) during treatment. The use of mRECIST resulted in an alteration of the response category. For patients with post-therapy cavitation, the objective response rate was 56% using RECIST1.1 and 67% by mRECIST. In addition, the survival rates between partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease when the mRECIST was applied were significantly different (p<0.05), while RECIST1.1 failed to show survival differences (p=0.218). For patients with post-therapy cavitation, mRECIST exhibited higher predictability of survival than RECIST1.1. Response assessment might be improved by incorporating cavitation into assessment, potentially altering outcomes of key clinical efficacy parameters.