Endothelial Growth Factor Monoclonal Antibody Research Articles

Prognostic analysis of peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

BackgroundInterval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a treatment option for advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal surgery is required for better survival; however, while peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) has been identified as a prognostic factor, its comprehensive assessment during IDS remains unexplored. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate PWC efficacy during IDS, alongside other factors including residual disease and the modeled cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), by retrospectively reviewing the medical records of 25 patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IDS between January 2017 to June 2023.ResultsTwelve (48.0%) patients were PWC-positive, and the remainder were PWC-negative. PWC was performed at laparotomy during IDS, after which five (41.7%) PWC-positive and four (30.8%) PWC-negative patients received bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, for maintenance treatment. Four (33.3%) PWC-positive and 10 (76.9%) PWC-negative patients received poly adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors. In patients who received bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, overall survival and progression-free survival did not significantly differ between those who were PWC-positive and PWC-negative (p = 0.27 and 0.20, respectively). Progression-free survival significantly differed between those with favorable and unfavorable CA-125 KELIM (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis indicated that optimal surgery and favorable CA-125 KELIM were associated with better progression-free survival (p < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively), with only optimal surgery associated with better overall survival (p = 0.04).ConclusionsA positive PWC at IDS was not associated with survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our findings indicate that although PWC status at IDS should be one of the factors determining survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, recent improvements in maintenance therapy may make the combination of CA-125 KELIM and PWC status a more useful prognostic factor in selecting treatment after IDS. Further studies are needed to validate these results, highlighting the potential importance of maintenance treatment after IDS and the need for further research to validate the clinical significance of a positive PWC.

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies: a World Health Organization pharmacovigilance study

PurposeTo analyze cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (ADRs) after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, and ranibizumab) treatment. SubjectsVigiBase, a World Health Organization (WHO) global safety report database DesignPharmacovigilance study MethodsThe individual-case-safety reports (ICSR) of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were compared with those reported in the full database. From 2004 to 2023, 23,129 ADRs after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and 25,015,132 ADRs associated with any drug (full database). Main Outcome MeasuresThe reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated, and the 95% lower credibility interval endpoint of the information component (IC025) was used for disproportionate Bayesian reporting. Inter-drug comparisons were performed using the ratio of odd ratio (rOR). ResultsCompared with the full database, anti-VEGFs were associated with an increased reporting of myocardial infarction (IC025 0.75; ROR: 1.78 [95% CI 1.70–1.86]), angina pectoris (IC025 0.53; ROR: 1.61 [95% CI 1.47–1.77]), arrythemias including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ventricular fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia (all IC025 >0, ROR>1), hypertension (IC025 2.22; ROR: 4.91 [95% CI 4.82–5.01]), and hypertensive crisis (IC025 1.97; ROR: 4.49 [95% CI 4.07–4.97]). Moreover, anti-VEGFs were associated with a higher reporting of cerebrovascular ADRs such as cerebral infarction (IC025 4.34; ROR: 23.19 [95% CI 22.10–24.34]), carotid artery stenosis (IC025 1.85; ROR: 5.24 [95% CI 3.98–6.89]), cerebral hemorrhage (IC025 2.29; ROR: 5.38 [95% CI 5.03–5.76]), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (IC025 1.98; ROR: 4.81 [95% CI 4.14–5.6]). Inter-drug comparison indicated that compared to ranibizumab, patients with aflibercept showed overall under-reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs such as myocardial infarction (rOR 0.55 [95% CI 0.49–0.52]), atrial fibrillation (rOR 0.28 [95% CI 0.23–0.35]), cerebrovascular accident (rOR, 0.15 [95% CI 0.14–0.17]), and cerebral hemorrhage (rOR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.40–0.65]). ConclusionsIn this pharmacovigilance case-noncase study, significantly increased reporting of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs were identified after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. While ranibizumab may exhibit superior systemic safety regarding its biological characteristics, it is crucial not to overlook the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ADRs considering its higher reporting rate than bevacizumab or aflibercept.

Acute kidney injury in cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody vs. immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective real-world study

BackgroundAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (anti-VEGF) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are commonly administered to cancer patients. Although cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF or ICIs have been reported to experience an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), comparative studies on the AKI incidence have not been evaluated.MethodsCancer patients receiving anti-VEGF or ICIs were retrospectively selected from the hospital information system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between Jan, 2020 and Dec, 2022 and were divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen: anti-VEGF group and ICIs group. The baseline characteristics were propensity-score matched. The primary outcome was sustained AKI. A comparison of cumulative incidence of sustained AKI was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Risks for outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional regression.ResultsA total of 1581 cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF (n = 696) or ICIs (n = 885) were included in the primary analysis. The ICIs group had a higher cumulative incidence of sustained AKI within one year than the anti-VEGF group (26.8% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001). Among 1392 propensity score matched patients, ICIs therapy (n = 696) was associated with an increased risk of sustained AKI events in the entire population (HR 2.0; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.5; P = 0.001) and especially in those with genitourinary cancer (HR 4.2; 95%CI 1.3 to 13.2; P = 0.015). Baseline serum albumin level (> 35 g/l) was an important risk factor for a lower incidence of sustained AKI in the anti-VEGF group (HR 0.5; 95%CI 0.3 to 0.9; P = 0.027) and the ICIs group (HR 0.3; 95%CI 0.2 to 0.5; P < 0.001).ConclusionsAmong cancer patients in this real-world study, treatment with ICIs increased incidence of sustained AKI in one year. Baseline serum albumin level was an important risk factor for sustained AKI. The risk factors for sustained AKI differed between the anti-VEGF group and the ICIs group.Trial RegistrationThe study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06119347) on 11/06/2023.

Prediction of resistance to bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer using a multi-marker panel and a machine-learning approach: Final results of the prospective multicenter PERMAD trial.

204 Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used for tumor treatment, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). So far, there are no biomarkers that reliably predict resistance to anti-VEGF mAbs like bevacizumab. A biomarker-guided strategy for early and accurate assessment of resistance could avoid the use of non-effective treatment and improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that repeated analysis of multiple cytokines and angiogenic growth factors (CAFs) before and during treatment using machine learning could provide an accurate and earlier, i.e., 100 days before conventional radiologic staging, prediction of resistance to first-line mCRC treatment with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. Methods: 15 German and Austrian centers prospectively recruited 154 mCRC patients receiving FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. Plasma samples were collected every two weeks until radiologic progression (RECIST 1.1) as determined by CT scans performed every 2 months. 102 pre-selected CAFs were centrally analyzed using a cytokine multiplex assay (Luminex, Myriad RBM). Results: Using random forest machine learning, we developed a predictive model that discriminated between the situations of ”no progress within 100 days before radiological progress” and ”progress within 100 days before radiological progress”. Into this we incorporated a combination of ten out of the 102 CAF markers, which fulfilled this task with 81% accuracy, 72% sensitivity, and 88% specificity. Conclusions: Using artificial intelligence we identified a CAF marker combination that indicates treatment resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC within 100 days prior to radiologic progress. Further studies are required to show its clinical value. Clinical trial information: NCT02331927 .

Prediction of resistance to bevacizumab plus FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer-Results of the prospective multicenter PERMAD trial.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used for tumor treatment, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). So far, there are no biomarkers that reliably predict resistance to anti-VEGF mAbs like bevacizumab. A biomarker-guided strategy for early and accurate assessment of resistance could avoid the use of non-effective treatment and improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that repeated analysis of multiple cytokines and angiogenic growth factors (CAFs) before and during treatment using machine learning could provide an accurate and earlier, i.e., 100 days before conventional radiologic staging, prediction of resistance to first-line mCRC treatment with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. 15 German and Austrian centers prospectively recruited 50 mCRC patients receiving FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment. Plasma samples were collected every two weeks until radiologic progression (RECIST 1.1) as determined by CT scans performed every 2 months. 102 pre-selected CAFs were centrally analyzed using a cytokine multiplex assay (Luminex, Myriad RBM). Using random forests, we developed a predictive machine learning model that discriminated between the situations of "no progress within 100 days before radiological progress" and "progress within 100 days before radiological progress". We could further identify a combination of ten out of the 102 CAF markers, which fulfilled this task with 78.2% accuracy, 71.8% sensitivity, and 82.5% specificity. We identified a CAF marker combination that indicates treatment resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC within 100 days prior to radiologic progress.

NCOG-17. RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING BEVACIZUMAB

Abstract Patients with malignant gliomas have an inherently high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).1 Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody commonly used in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas and is known to increase the risk of VTE as well as intracranial hemorrhage.2 Anticoagulation (AC) for VTE also increases the risk intracranial hemorrhage in patients with malignant brain tumors.3 This makes the treatment of VTE in patients with GBM receiving bevacizumab therapy particularly challenging. Here we completed a single center retrospective chart review of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated concurrently with anticoagulation for VTE and bevacizumab therapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the safety of concurrent use of these therapies and to note any statistically significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhagic complications between patients treated with anticoagulation at therapeutic versus prophylactic dosing. METHODS: 144 patients with a diagnosis of high-grade glioma and were treated at UCI from 1/1/2019 through 1/1/2022 were screened for the study. 13 GBM patients on treatment with bevacizumab and concurrent anticoagulation were included. Clinical records of these patients were reviewed for the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage or any clinically significant bleeding. RESULTS: The incidence of ICH in GBM patients on concurrent therapy with bevacizumab and anticoagulation was 7.7% and the incidence of other minor bleeding complications was 7.7%. ICH and other minor bleeding was exclusively seen in patients on therapeutic anticoagulant dosing. No bleeding complications were noted in patients on prophylactic AC dosing. CONCLUSION: There is a risk of ICH in patients receiving both bevacizumab and anticoagulation, however compared to historical data, the incidence reported in our study is less than the incidence of ICH in GBM patients on anticoagulation alone. Our study suggests that it is relatively safe to treat patients with these therapies simultaneously.

The New Era of Systemic Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the First Line to the Optimal Sequence.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most common primary liver cancer and is considered a major global health problem as one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. Due to the increase in life expectancy and the epidemiological growth of specific risk factors, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the incidence of HCC is growing globally, and mortality rates are still high. Moreover, patients frequently present at an intermediate or advanced tumor stage, when curative treatments, such as surgical resection, liver transplantation or ablation are no longer applicable. In these cases, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic therapy are the only suitable options to achieve disease control. The multi-kinase inhibitor Sorafenib has been the only systemic treatment available for unresectable advanced HCC for almost a decade, but in the last couple of years new therapeutic options have emerged. Recent advances in understanding the interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment, especially cancer immune escape, led to the advent of immunotherapy. Currently, first-line systemic treatment for HCC is represented by the combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, but many other ICIs have been investigated, such as Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab and Ipilimumab. However, the problem of second- and third-line therapies, and the correct sequence of treatments remains open and is not addressed in most studies. This explains the urge to find new systemic treatments that can improve the survival and quality of life in patients that can go beyond the first line of treatment. The aim of this paper is to offer a complete overview of the most recent innovations in systemic treatments for unresectable locally advanced and metastatic HCC, including emerging therapies, with a particular focus on treatment sequences. Moreover, we will provide an outlook on possible future approaches to patients who progress beyond first-line therapies.

Matrix stiffness triggers lipid metabolic crosstalk between tumor and stromal cells to mediate bevacizumab resistance in colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody that plays an important role in the combination treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, resistance remains a major hurdle limiting bevacizumab efficacy, highlighting the importance of identifying mechanism of anti-angiogenic therapy resistance. Here, we investigated biophysical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) related to metabolic processes and acquired resistance to bevacizumab. Evaluation of paired pre- and post-treatment samples of liver metastases from 20 CRC patients treated with combination bevacizumab therapy, including 10 responders and 10 non-responders, indicated that ECM deposition in liver metastases and a highly activated fatty acid oxidation (FAO) pathway were elevated in non-responders after anti-angiogenic therapy compared to responders. In mouse models of liver metastatic CRC, anti-VEGF increased ECM deposition and FAO in CRC cells, and treatment with the FAO inhibitor etomoxir enhanced the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) were essential for matrix stiffness-mediated FAO in colon cancer cells. Matrix stiffness activated lipolysis in HSCs via the focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/yes-associated protein (YAP) pathway, and free fatty acids secreted by HSCs were absorbed as metabolic substrates and activated FAO in colon cancer cells. Suppressing HSC lipolysis using FAK and YAP inhibition enhanced the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy. Together, these results indicate that bevacizumab-induced ECM remodeling triggers lipid metabolic crosstalk between colon cancer cells and HSCs. This metabolic mechanism of bevacizumab resistance mediated by the physical tumor microenvironment represents a potential therapeutic target for reversing drug resistance.

Targeted therapies in ovarian cancer: where we stand and where we are heading

Background: Ovarian cancer is a highly lethal gynecological cancer globally. The standard treatment for this disease is cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most patients develop platinum resistance after multiple relapses and have an inadequate response to second-line chemotherapy. Additionally, molecular heterogeneity poses a challenge to effective treatment.Current Concepts: Advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer progression provide insight into novel targeted therapies, which have emerged as groundbreaking and promising cancer treatment strategies. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies are currently the two approved and most effective targeted drugs for ovarian cancer.Discussion and Conclusion: This review article discusses related clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of promising targets in ovarian cancer as well as challenges associated with targeted therapy, including drug resistance, heterogeneity, and toxicity. Additionally, possible solutions to optimize treatment effects are proposed. Targeting these molecular abnormalities will bring us closer to the goal of personalized therapy and improve the prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer.

A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin® in healthy Chinese male subjects

BackgroundThe biosimilar landscape for malignancies continues to grow, with several biosimilars for reference product bevacizumab currently available. Bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody injection remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to that of Avastin® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and parallel-group study was performed on 88 healthy men who randomly (1:1) received either the test drug as an intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg or Avastin®. The primary PK parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t). Secondary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), AUC from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), safety, and immunogenicity. Serum bevacizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).ResultsThe baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC0–t, Cmax and AUCinf between the test group and reference group were 91.71%–103.18%, 95.72%–107.49% and 91.03%–103.43%, respectively. These values were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80.00%–125.00%, demonstrating the biosimilarity of the test drug and Avastin®. Eighty-one treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with a comparable incidence among the test group (90.91%) and the reference group (93.18%). No serious adverse events were reported. The incidence of ADA antibodies in the two groups was low and similar.ConclusionIn healthy Chinese men, PK similarity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to Avastin® was confirmed, with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Subsequent studies should investigate recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection in patients setting.Trial registrationRegistered 08/10/2019, CTR20191923.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. MethodsA partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing therapeutic options in a 10 years’ time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. ResultsThe most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71 195.40/QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 3× threshold. ConclusionsThe therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.

CEA dynamics for predicting response after anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most widely used tumor marker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, its potential as a predictive marker of progression in mCRC during systemic chemotherapy, particularly in patients receiving monoclonal antibodies as a combination therapy, has remained of interest. Herein, we investigated whether CEA changes could predict disease progression and clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC cotreated with systemic chemotherapy and/or biologic agents. A total of 1261 patients with mCRC undergoing a first-line systemic treatment were included in this retrospective study. We analyzed the optimal cut-off value for CEA changes to predict progression at the first response evaluation by the treatment arm (chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody [mAb], and chemotherapy plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mAb). These cut-off values were then used to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). When stratified by their treatment arm, 891 (70.6%), 266 (21.0%), and 104 (8.2%) of the study patients were included in the chemotherapy alone-, anti-VEGF mAb, and anti-EGFR mAb groups, respectively. The optimal CEA cut-off values were 16.5% and 38.9% increase in the whole cohort and anti-EGFR mAb group, respectively, and these values showed high sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease progression. The patients in the entire population and anti-EGFR mAb group with CEA changes below these cut-off values showed significantly better OS and PFS outcomes compared those whose changes were above cut-off values. Among the patients with mCRC treated with anti-VEGF mAb, no associations were found between OS or PFS outcomes and CEA changes. CEA is potentially a good surrogate marker for predicting disease progression and survival outcomes in patients with mCRC receiving first-line systemic chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with anti-EGFR mAb, whereas it is less effective in those treated with anti-VEGF mAb.

Panitumumab vs Bevacizumab Added to Standard First-line Chemotherapy and Overall Survival Among Patients With RAS Wild-type, Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

For patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibodies to first-line doublet chemotherapy is routine, but the optimal targeted therapy has not been defined. To evaluate the effect of adding panitumumab (an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) vs bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) to standard first-line chemotherapy for treatment of RAS wild-type, left-sided, metastatic colorectal cancer. Randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial at 197 sites in Japan in May 2015-January 2022 among 823 patients with chemotherapy-naive RAS wild-type, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (final follow-up, January 14, 2022). Panitumumab (n = 411) or bevacizumab (n = 412) plus modified fluorouracil, l-leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) every 14 days. The primary end point, overall survival, was tested first in participants with left-sided tumors, then in the overall population. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and curative (defined as R0 status) resection rate. In the as-treated population (n = 802; median age, 66 years; 282 [35.2%] women), 604 (75.3%) had left-sided tumors. Median follow-up was 61 months. Median overall survival was 37.9 months with panitumumab vs 34.3 months with bevacizumab in participants with left-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.82; 95.798% CI, 0.68-0.99; P = .03) and 36.2 vs 31.3 months, respectively, in the overall population (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03). Median progression-free survival for panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.9 months, respectively, for those with left-sided tumors (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20) and 12.2 vs 11.4 months overall (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24). Response rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 80.2% vs 68.6%, respectively, for left-sided tumors (difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.4%-17.9%) and 74.9% vs 67.3% overall (difference, 7.7%; 95% CI, 1.5%-13.8%). Median duration of response with panitumumab vs bevacizumab was 13.1 vs 11.2 months for left-sided tumors (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10) and 11.9 vs 10.7 months overall (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06). Curative resection rates with panitumumab vs bevacizumab were 18.3% vs 11.6% for left-sided tumors; (difference, 6.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-12.3%) and 16.5% vs 10.9% overall (difference, 5.6%; 95% CI, 1.0%-10.3%). Common treatment-emergent adverse events were acneiform rash (panitumumab: 74.8%; bevacizumab: 3.2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (panitumumab: 70.8%; bevacizumab: 73.7%), and stomatitis (panitumumab: 61.6%; bevacizumab: 40.5%). Among patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, adding panitumumab, compared with bevacizumab, to standard first-line chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in those with left-sided tumors and in the overall population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02394795.

Novel considerations on EGFR-based therapy as a contributor to cancer cell death in NSCLC.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represented by gefitinib and erlotinib are widely used in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment remains a clinical challenge. In recent years, emerging research investigated in EGFR-TKI-based combination therapy regimens, and remarkable achievements have been reported. This article focuses on EGFR-TKI-based regimens, reviews the standard and novel application of EGFR targets, and summarizes the mechanisms of EGFR-TKI combinations including chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies, and immunotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC. Additionally, we summarize clinical trials of EGFR-TKI-based combination therapy expanding indications to EGFR mutation-negative lung malignancies. Moreover, novel strategies are under research to explore new drugs with good biocompatibility. Nanoparticles encapsulating non-coding RNA and chemotherapy of new dosage forms drawn great attention and showed promising prospects in effective delivery and stable release. Overall, as the development of resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment is inevitable in most of the cases, further research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanism of the resistance, and to evaluate and establish EGFR-TKI combination therapies to diversify the treatment landscape for NSCLC.

Angiogenesis and immune checkpoint dual blockade: Opportunities and challenges for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy.

The disease burden related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing. Most HCC patients are diagnosed at the advanced stage and multikinase inhibitors have been the only treatment choice for them. Recently, the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a new therapeutic strategy for HCC. It is noteworthy that the positive outcomes of the phase III clinical trial IMBrave150 [atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody) combined with bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody)], showed that overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly better with sorafenib. This combination therapy has become the new standard therapy for advanced HCC and has also attracted more attention in the treatment of HCC with anti-angiogenesis-immune combination therapy. Currently, the synergistic antitumor efficacy of this combination has been shown in many preclinical and clinical studies. In this review, we discuss the mechanism and clinical application of anti-angiogenics and immunotherapy in HCC, outline the relevant mechanism and rationality of the combined application of anti-angiogenics and ICIs, and point out the existing challenges of the combination therapy.

Inhibition of Angiogenesis and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling: Synergistic Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Bevacizumab.

Bevacizumab (Bev) is a humanized vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody that is used with chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Bev-induced hypertension (HT) is the most common adverse reaction during clinical practice. However, at present, appropriate antihypertensive agents for Bev-induced HT are unavailable. In this study, retrospective analysis of clinical data from mCRC patients who received renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) showed significant survival benefits of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) over patients who received calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and patients who received no antihypertensive drug (NO: Y2020046 retrospectively registered). An experiment of HCT116 colon cancer cell xenografts in mice confirmed that combined treatment of Bev and lisinopril (Lis), a RASI, synergistically inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth and enhanced the concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) in tumor tissues. Our results showed that the addition of Lis did not interfere with the vascular normalization effect promoted by Bev, but also inhibited collagen and hyaluronic acid (HA) deposition and significantly downregulated the expression of TGF-β1 and downstream SMAD signaling components which were enhanced by Bev, ultimately remodeling primary extracellular matrix components. In conclusion, RASIs and Bev have synergistic effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer and RASIs might be an optimal choice for the treatment of Bev-induced HT.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of brolucizumab versus aflibercept for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Italy

BackgroundAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common and chronic eye condition characterized by the presence of progressive degenerative abnormalities in the central retina (macula). Notably, neovascular, or wet, AMD (nAMD) occurs when new, abnormal blood vessels grow under the macula causing scarring of the macula itself and resulting in a loss of central vision, visual distortion, and an impaired capacity of perceiving colour contrast and intensity. Brolucizumab, a new generation anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibody, was approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of nAMD. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness profile of brolucizumab, compared to the main therapeutic alternative available (aflibercept), for the treatment of nAMD.MethodsThe simulation of costs and outcomes was carried out using a Markov model over a time horizon of 15 years. In base-case, treatment effectiveness inputs for brolucizumab and aflibercept were extracted from the HAWK and HARRIER studies and from a network meta-analysis. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective was considered, therefore only healthcare direct costs (treatment acquisition, administration, adverse events, disease monitoring) were analysed. In the alternative scenarios, the societal perspective and a prolonged time horizon were considered. Model robustness was tested through sensitivity analyses.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, brolucizumab was dominant over aflibercept (+ 0.11 years QALY gained and -€15,679 costs). Both one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness and reliability of base-case results. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that when the willingness to pay is equal to €50,000 per QALY gained, brolucizumab would be dominant in 84% of simulations and in the remaining simulations brolucizumab would be cost-effective compared to aflibercept. Results of the alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses confirmed the results of base-case.ConclusionThe cost-utility analysis shows that brolucizumab is dominant over aflibercept. Treatment with brolucizumab reduces the economic impact of nAMD and determined a slight increase of quality-adjusted survival. This analysis gives a high level of confidence that the treatment with brolucizumab would reduce the burden of intravitreal injections, compared to aflibercept, a relevant therapeutic alternative in Italy.

Effect of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Harboring CTNNB1 Mutation in Early Clinical Experience.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BV) treatment is a combined immunotherapy consisting of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, which has brought a major paradigm shift in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Gain-of-function mutation of CTNNB1 contributes to resistance of ICI monotherapy through the framework of non-T-cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment. However, whether CTNNB1 mutation renders resistance to ATZ/BV similar to ICI monotherapy remains to be elucidated. In this study, a liquid biopsy sample in plasma of 33 patients with HCC treated with ATZ/BV was subjected to droplet digital PCR for detecting hotspot mutations at the exon 3 of CTNNB1 locus. A total of eight patients (24.2%) exhibited at least one CTNNB1 mutation. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients with wild-type (WT) and mutant (MT) CTNNB1 was 8.0% and 12.5%, respectively, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 68.0% and 87.5%, respectively. No significant difference in both ORR and DCR has been observed between the two groups. The median progression-free survival in patients with WT and MT CTNNB1 was 6.6 and 7.6 months, respectively (not statistically significant). Similarly, no significant difference in overall survival has been observed between patients with WT and MT CTNNB1 (13.6 vs. 12.3 months). In conclusion, the treatment effect of ATZ/BV in patients with HCC with MT CTNNB1 was comparable to those patients with WT CTNNB1. These results implicate that BV added to ATZ might improve immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment caused by CTNNB1 mutation.

Spontaneous Enterocutaneous Fistula Formation and Closure on Anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Associated Adverse Effect during Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Advanced Stage Colonic Adenocarcinoma

Background: Bevacizumab as part of anti-VEGF is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor and is used in the standard adjuvant chemotherapy to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. Venous thromboembolism, delayed wound healing, spontaneous bowel perforation are the adverse events following bevacizumab treatment. According to the timing of fistula growth relative to operation and starting bevacizumab treatment, fistulas are possibly secondary to bevacizumab treatment rather than postoperative complications.

Recent Update in Pharmacological Agents for Optic Pathway Glioma.

Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) are insidious, debilitating low-grade tumors. They can affect the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and optic tracts and can be sporadic or associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The location of OPGs within the optic pathway typically precludes complete resection or optimal radiation dose. Treatment is unnecessary for sporadic and NF1-related OPGs that do not cause visual impairments. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with progressive disease. However, outcomes following standard treatments have been mixed, and standardized outcome measurements are lacking. In recent years, newer molecularly targeted therapies such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, represent a promising treatment modality.