Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Research Articles

Benign insulinoma treated with endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation: a case report

Benign insulinoma treated with endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation: a case report

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA

Emerging data suggest neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with improved survival. However, less than 40% demonstrate a meaningful radiographic response to NAC. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as a new modality to treat PDAC. We hypothesize that NAC plus EUS-RFA can be used in the management of resectable PDAC. Prospective review of PDAC patients meeting criteria of resectable tumor anatomy that underwent NAC chemotherapy plus EUS-RFA followed by pancreatic resection. Radiographic imaging, perioperative and short-term outcomes were recorded. Surgical pathology specimens were analyzed for treatment response. Three eligible patients with resectable PDAC received 4 months of NAC plus EUS-RFA. One month after NAC and EUS-RFA completion, all 3 patients underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy without complications. After a 6-week recovery, all patients completed 2 months of post-op adjuvant chemotherapy. In our institutional experience, this treatment protocol appears safe as patients tolerated the combination of chemotherapy and ablation. Patients underwent pancreatic resection with uneventful recovery. This novel neoadjuvant approach may provide a more effective alternative to chemotherapy alone.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic tumors.

Surgery is a cornerstone in the management of pancreatic cancer and precancerous pancreatic lesions. However, many patients are not suitable candidates for surgery at the time of diagnosis for various reasons. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) appears to be a promising treatment option for patients who are ineligible for surgery for management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), and pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). EUS-RFA may serve as an adjunct to chemotherapy or palliative measures for inoperable cases of PDAC. Given its feasibility and efficacy, EUS-RFA has an evolving niche as a minimally invasive and potentially definitive treatment for PNETs and high-risk PCLs such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). EUS-RFA is a generally well tolerated procedure, with abdominal pain and acute pancreatitis being the most common adverse effects, though the risk can be mitigated through prophylactic measures. There is an increasing body of evidence to support the use of EUS-RFA in managing pancreatic lesions, either as definitive, adjunctive, or palliative treatment, depending on lesion type.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation as Therapeutic Approach for Pancreatic Insulinoma

Insulinoma is one of the most prevalent form of functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas (PNET) that often manifests with debilitating symptomatic hypoglycemia. When conventional imaging fails to detect the lesion, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have proven to be of value to determine the preoperative localisation as well as with biochemical sampling via fine needle aspiration of the suspected lesion. Surgical resection has been the standard care for these pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, with recent advancements, endoscopicultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as a promising and less invasive therapeutic approach that carries a favourable outcome and a low risk of complications. We report eda patient with symptomatic pancreatic insulinoma who was treated with EUS-RFA.

Assessing Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Historic Cohort Study.

/aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an alternative for the local treatment of unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aim to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-RFA in patients with unresectable PDAC. The following was a historic cohort compounded by locally advanced (LA) and metastatic (m) PDAC naïve patients, who underwent EUS-RFA between October 2019 to March 2022. EUS-RFA was performed with a 19-g needle electrode with a 10 mm active tip for energy delivery. Study primary endpoints were feasibility, safety, and clinical follow-up; secondary endpoints were performance status (PS), local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-six patients were selected: 15/26 LA-PDAC and 11/26 mPDAC. Technical success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events. Six months after EUS-RFA, OS was 11/26 (42.3%), with significant PS improvement (P=.03). LC was achieved, with tumor reduction from 39.5 to 26 mm (P=.04). Post-treatment hypodense necrotic area was observed at six-month follow-up in 11/11 alive cases. Metastatic disease was a significant factor for OS worsening (HR 5.021; IC 95% 1.589 - 15.87; P=.004) CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RFA of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a minimally invasive and safe technique that may have an important role as targeted therapy for local treatment of unresectable cases, as well as an alternative for poor surgical candidates. Also, RFA may play a role in downstaging cancer with potential OS increase in non-metastatic cases. Large prospective cohorts are required to evaluate this technique in clinical practice.

Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of benign insulinomas.

In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an alternative nonsurgical treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term follow-up of patients treated with EUS-RFA for a sporadic insulinoma in our centre in terms of efficacy, safety and risk of recurrence. We retrospectively analysed the data of 11 patients with an insulinoma treated by EUS-RFA in our tertiary centre between June 2018 and April 2022. Clinical and biological, as well as imaging, follow-up was planned at 3, 6, 12 months and then annually. In our series, there were nine women and two men with a median age of 65 years. All tumours were sporadic, with a mean size of 11 mm. The procedure allowed an immediate and complete symptomatic and biological remission in all patients without notable complications. Complete radiological resolution of the tumour after ablation was observed in seven patients, and persistence of an asymptomatic tumour residue was observed in four patients. During the mean follow-up period of 26 months, two patients presented a significant but asymptomatic increase of the tumour residue; a second EUS-RFA session was performed in one patient and the other patient is being closely monitored. EUS-RFA treatment of benign insulinomas provides a long-term complete clinical resolution of hypoglycaemia. A long-term follow-up is essential if residual tumour persists after initial EUS-RFA treatment.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been constantly increasing, particularly in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). While emerging data in this field are accumulating, we aimed to assess the pooled efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA for pNENs. The PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases search was conducted to identify studies reporting EUS-RFA of pNENs with outcomes of interest (efficacy and safety). The primary outcome was radiological response. Efficacy was assessed by the pooled clinical response rate, whereas safety was assessed by the pooled adverse events (AEs) rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Pooled estimates and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect model. Eleven studies involving 292 patients were included. The pooled technical success rate was 99.2% (95% CI 97.9-99.9%), with no heterogeneity. The pooled complete radiological response was 87.1% (95% CI 80.1-92.8%). The pooled partial response was 11.4% (95% CI 6.2-18.1%). The pooled clinical response rate for functional pNENs was 94.9% (95% CI 90.7-97.9%), with no heterogeneity. The pooled incidence of AEs was 20.0% (95% CI 14.0-26.7%); most AEs were mild to moderate in grade, while the pooled incidence of severe AEs was 0.9% (95% CI 0.2-2.3%). The most common AEs were transient mild abdominal pain in 19 patients (6.5%), and mild to moderate pancreatitis in 23 patients (7.9%). No cases of mortality were reported. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation resulted on a feasible approach for pNENs treatment, with excellent technical success, high radiological and clinical response, and acceptable AE rate.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic insulinoma: A single-center experience

Background/objectivesInsulinomas are rare, functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN), whose gold standard therapy is surgical resection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a recent technique that has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for patients with pancreatic lesions not eligible for surgery. In this study, we aimed to describe a series of patients with unresectable pancreatic insulinoma treated with EUS-RFA. MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective study including all consecutive patients with functioning pancreatic insulinoma undergoing EUS-RFA for surgical unfitness or surgery refusal, between March 2017 and September 2021. Technical success (i.e., complete mass ablation), adverse event rate and severity, clinical and radiologic outcomes (i.e., symptom remission with a normal concentration of blood glucose, and the presence of intralesional necrosis), and post-procedural follow-up were assessed. ResultsA total of 10 patients (mean age: 67.1 ± 10.1years; F:M 7:3) were included. The mean size of insulinoma was 11.9 ± 3.3 mm. Technical success and clinical remission were achieved in 100% of patients. Only one (10%) patient was successfully treated with two RFA sessions. Two procedure-related early adverse events occurred, including two (20%) cases of mild abdominal pain. No major complications were observed. The complete radiologic response within 3 months after EUS-RFA was observed in all patients (100%). After a median follow-up of 19.5 (range12–59) months, symptom remission and persistent euglycemia were assessed in all the patients. ConclusionsData from this case series suggest that EUS-RFA is a feasible and safe therapeutic approach for pancreatic insulinomas in patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgery with medium-term efficacy.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Treatment of Pancreatic Insulinoma

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is emerging as a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to compare EUS-RFA and surgical resection for the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma (PI). Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA. Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P< .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P= .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients). EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in managing pancreatic malignancy.

Pancreatic malignancy is still the most lethal gastrointestinal malignancy. It has a very poor prognosis with low survival rate. Surgery is still the main treatment option for pancreatic malignancy. Most patients already have locally advanced and even late stage disease due to non-specific abdominal symptoms. Even though some cases are still suitable for surgical treatment, due to its aggressiveness adjuvant chemotherapy is becoming the standard treatment for controlling the disease. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a thermal therapy that has been used as one of the standard treatments for liver malignancy. It can also be performed intraoperatively. There are several reports on percutaneous RFA treatment for pancreatic malignancy using transabdominal ultrasound and guided by computed tomography scan. However, due to its anatomical location and the risk of high radiation exposure, these methods seem to be very limited. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been widely used for pancreatic abnormality evaluation due to its ability to detect more accurately, especially small pancreatic lesions, compared to other imaging modalities. By the EUS approach, it is easier to achieve good visualization of tumor ablation and necrosis as the echoendoscope position is closer to the tumor area. Based on studies and a recent meta-analysis, EUS-guided RFA is a promising treatment approach for most pancreatic malignancy cases, but most studies only collected data from a small sample size. Larger studies are needed before clinical recommendations can be made.

A Review on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA) of Pancreatic Lesions.

The morbidity associated with pancreatectomies limits surgical options for high-risk patients with pancreatic neoplasms that warrant resection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) offers a minimally invasive and potentially definitive means to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and precancerous pancreatic cystic lesions. In addition, EUS-RFA may play a role in the treatment and palliation of non-surgical cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The efficacy of RFA appears to be further enhanced by systemic immunomodulatory effects. Here, we review current studies on the developing role of EUS-RFA in these pancreatic pathologies.

Radiofrequency ablation for pancreatobiliary disease: an updated review.

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option in cases of malignant biliary obstruction, pancreatic cancer, and other pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Intraductal biliary RFA is safe, effective, and confers a survival advantage over stenting alone, where it should be used an adjunct to biliary stenting. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided RFA can also provide pancreatic cyst resolution in patients who are not ideal operative candidates. The aim of this review is to describe the endoscopic applications and associated outcomes of RFA.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic tumors: A critical review focusing on safety, efficacy and controversies.

The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the last two decades has shifted from a diagnostic tool to an important therapeutic tool treating mainly pancreato-biliary disorders. In recent years, its applications for treating pancreatic diseases have broadened, including the implementation of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which has been traditionally used for treating solid tumors. In this critical in-depth review, we summarized all the papers throughout the literature regarding EUS-RFA for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, adenocarcinoma, and pancreatic cystic lesions. Overall, for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms we identified 16 papers that reported 96 patients who underwent EUS-RFA, with acceptable adverse events that were rated mild to moderate and a high complete radiological resolution rate of 90%. For pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we identified 8 papers with 121 patients. Adverse events occurred in 13% of patients, mostly rated mild. However, no clear survival benefit was demonstrated. For pancreatic cystic lesions, we identified 4 papers with 38 patients. The adverse events were mostly mild and occurred in 9.1% of patients, and complete or partial radiological resolution of the cysts was reported in 36.8%. Notably, the procedure was technically feasible for most of the patients. Nevertheless, a long road remains before this technique finds its definite place in guidelines due to several controversies. EUS-RFA for pancreatic tumors seems to be safe and effective, especially for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, but multicenter prospective trials are needed to consider this treatment as a gold standard.

Radiofrequency ablation remodels the tumor microenvironment and promotes neutrophil-mediated abscopal immunomodulation in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a 5-year overall survival rate of 11%, despite efforts to improve clinical outcomes in the past two decades. Therapeutic resistance is a hallmark of this disease, due to its dense and suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a promising local ablative and potential immunomodulatory therapy for PDAC. In this study, we performed RFA in a preclinical tumor-bearing KrasG12D; Trp53R172H/+; Pdx1:Cre (KPC) syngeneic model, analyzed local and abscopal affects after RFA and compared our findings with resected PDAC specimens. We found that RFA reduced PDAC tumor progression in vivo and promoted strong TME remodeling. Additionally, we discovered tumor-infiltrating neutrophils determined abscopal effects. Using imaging mass cytometry, we showed that RFA elevated dendritic cell numbers in RFA-treated tumors and promoted a significant CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell abscopal response. In addition, RFA elevated levels of PD-L1 and checkpoint blockade inhibition targeting PD-L1 sustained tumor growth reduction in the context of RFA. This study indicates RFA treatment, which has been shown to increase tumor antigen shedding, promotes antitumor immunity. This is critical in PDAC where recent clinical immunotherapy trials have not resulted in substantial changes in overall survival.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for advanced pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma

Long term prognosis and 5-year survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains suboptimal. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided RFA (EUS-RFA) is an emerging technology and limited data exist regarding safety and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study is to report safety-profile, feasibility and outcomes of EUS-RFA for advanced PDAC. Prospective review of patients with diagnosis of locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC undergoing EUS-RFA between October 2016 to March 2018 with long-term follow up (> 30 months). Study patients underwent a total of 1–4 RFA sessions. All patients were enrolled in longitudinal cohort study and received standard of care chemotherapy. 10 patients underwent EUS-RFA. Location of the lesions was in the head(4), neck(2), body(2), and tail(2). 22 RFA sessions were performed with a range of 1–4 sessions per patient. There were no major adverse events (bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis) in immediate (up to 72 h) and short-term follow up (4 weeks). Mild worsening of existing abdominal pain was noted during post-procedure observation in 12/22 (55%) of RFA treatments. Follow-up imaging demonstrated tumor progression in 2 patients, whereas tumor regression was noted in 6 patients (> 50% reduction in size in 3 patients). Median survival for the cohort was 20.5 months (95% CI, 9.93–42.2 months). Currently, 2 patients remain alive at 61 and 81 months follow-up since initial diagnosis. One patient had 3 cm PDAC with encasement of the portal confluence, abutment of the celiac axis, common hepatic and superior mesenteric artery. This patient had significant reduction in tumor size and underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. In our experience, EUS-RFA was safe, well-tolerated and could be concurrently performed with standard chemotherapy. In this select cohort, median survival was improved when compared to published survival based upon SEER database and clinical trials. Future prospective trials are needed to understand the role of EUS-RFA in overall management of PDAC.

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors and oligometastatic disease: an observational prospective multicenter study.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is an emerging and minimally invasive technique that seems promising for treatment of focal pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical and clinical success of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic EUS-RFA. Patients and methods We prospectively collected clinical and technical data for all patients who underwent EUS-RFA at two Belgian academic centers from June 2018 to February 2022. Feasibility, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up were also assessed. Results Twenty-nine patients were included, accounting for 35 lesions: 10 non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors (29 %), 13 pancreatic insulinomas (37 %), one adenocarcinoma (3 %), and 11 intra-pancreatic and extra-pancreatic metastatic lesions (31 %). Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases, with a median of three power applications per lesion (interquartile range 2). The majority of patients (59 %) presented no collateral effects, three (10.3 %) developed non-severe acute pancreatitis, and four (14 %) had mild abdominal pain. At 6 months follow-up (n = 25), 36 % of patients showed radiological complete response, 16 % presented a significant partial response and 48 % showed < 50 % decrease in diameter. At 12 months (n = 20), 30 % showed complete necrosis and 15 % > 50 % decrease in diameter. Hypoglycemia related to insulinoma was immediately corrected in all 13 cases, with no recurrence during follow-up. Conclusions EUS-RFA is feasible, safe, and effective for treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors. Larger and longer multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish its role in management of focal pancreatic lesions and oligometastatic disease. Symptomatic insulinoma currently represent the best indication.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of premalignant pancreatic-cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors: prospective study.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a developing therapeutic approach for premalignant pancreatic-cystic neoplasms (PCNs) and small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). The safety and efficacy of pancreatic EUS-RFA were previously reported in small series. Herein we report our initial experience with RFA of PCNs and small PNETs. This is a prospective single-center study including 12 patients with a median follow-up of 7 months, with either PCN or PNET &amp;lt;2 cm. Eligible PCNs were either intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) with worrisome features or mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) that were not eligible or refused surgery. Ablation was performed using a 19-gauge dedicated needle. Twelve patients were treated, five had PCNs (four IPMNs, one MCN; median size of 36 mm, range 12-60) and seven had PNETs (median size 8.9 mm, range 6-18). Among patients with PCNs, the complete radiologic response was achieved in 3/5 (60%), partial response in 1/5 (20%) and failure in 1/5 (20%). Among six patients with nonfunctioning PNETs, the complete radiologic response was achieved in 4/6 (66.7%), partial radiologic response in 0/6 (0%) and failure in 2/6 (33.3%). Following a median follow-up of 7 months. One patient with insulinoma showed complete resolution of hypoglycemia-related symptoms. Three postprocedural adverse events occurred, including one case (1/12, 8.3%) of mild acute pancreatitis and two cases (2/12, 16.7%) of abdominal pain. EUS-guided RFA for premalignant PCNs and PNETs is feasible and well-tolerated. Efficacy would be further evaluated with continued follow-up of patients.

In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Radiofrequency Ablation Electrode in Pig Livers

(1) Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is an alternative treatment for pancreatic tumors. Currently, EUS-RFA has been trialled to treat hepatic tumors. However, little has been reported about optimal settings for EUS-RFA in patients with hepatic tumors. We evaluated the ablation effect after in vivo RFA using a new EUS-RFA electrode in a pig model. (2) Methods Four pigs were used for the in vivo test. The in vivo testing was divided into two tests based on the length of the RFA electrode (0.5, 0.7, 1 or 1.5 cm), the ablation power (30 W or 50 W), and the ablation time (10 or 15 s). In test one, ablation effect was evaluated based on the electrode length and power. In test two, ablation effect was assessed based on power and time. (3) Results: In test one, the ablation width and depth correlated with the length of the electrode and power (0.5 cm, 10 W, 10 s: width 0.46 cm, depth 0.65 cm vs. 1.5 cm, 75 W, 10 s: width 0.77 cm, depth 1.80 cm). In test two, ablation width and depth were similar when RFA was set at 1.5cm, 50 W, and 10 s or 1 cm, 30 W, and 15 s (0.65 cm, 1.14 cm vs. 0.65cm, 1.26 cm). (4) Conclusions: The relationship between electrode length, ablation power, and ablation time, and the resulting ablation effect in pig livers suggest that EUS-RFA produces effective ablation while minimizing thermal injury.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for management of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to treat various abdominal tumors including pancreatic tumors. Multiple approaches such as laparoscopic, open, and percutaneous have been used for pancreatic tissue ablation. More recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA has emerged as a new technique for pancreatic tissue ablation. The role of EUS-RFA in management of pancreatic lesions is still not well-established. In this study, our aim is to assess efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA for management of pancreatic lesions. MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting EUS-RFA of pancreatic lesions with outcomes of interest. Studies with <5 patients were excluded. Clinical success was defined as symptom resolution, decrease in tumor size, and/or evidence of necrosis on radiologic imaging. Efficacy was assessed by the pooled clinical response rate whereas safety was assessed by the pooled adverse events rate. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. Pooled estimates and the 95% CI were calculated using random-effect model. Ten studies (5 retrospective and 5 prospective) involving 115 patients with 125 pancreatic lesions were included. 152 EUS-RFA procedures were performed. The lesions comprised of 37.6% non-functional neuroendocrine tumors (NFNETs), 15.4% were insulinomas, 26.5% were pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), and 19.7% were pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The majority were present in the pancreatic head (40.2%), 38.3% in the body, 11.2% in the tail, and 10.3% in the uncinate process. Pooled overall clinical response rate was 88.9% (95% CI: 82.4-93.7, I2=38.1%). Pooled overall adverse events rate was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.4-11.7, I2=34.0%). The most common complication was acute pancreatitis (3.3%) followed by pancreatic duct stenosis, peripancreatic fluid collection, and ascites (2.8%) each. Only one case of perforation was reported with pooled rate of (2.1%). This study demonstrates that EUS-RFA is an effective treatment modality for pancreatic lesions, especially functional neuroendocrine tumors such as insulinomas.