Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage Research Articles

Comment on "An Unusual Abscess Associated with Gallbladder Perforation Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Abscess Drainage".

Comment on "An Unusual Abscess Associated with Gallbladder Perforation Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Abscess Drainage".

Authors response: "An Unusual Abscess Associated with Gallbladder Perforation Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Abscess Drainage".

Authors response: "An Unusual Abscess Associated with Gallbladder Perforation Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Abscess Drainage".

Cost-Effectiveness in Alternative Treatment Options for Pancreatic Pseudocysts

Pancreatic pseudocysts often arise as complications of pancreatitis and present unique challenges in clinical management, encompassing considerations for both technical aspects and financial implications. Before the advancements of invasive gastroenterology, pancreatic pseudocysts have been drained surgically for many years. Nowadays, we have less invasive techniques with higher efficiency and lower mortality rates, however, they remain cost-challenging for most countries. Materials and Methods: We present four patients (two males and two females) with pancreatic pseudocysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric drainage using plastic stents accompanied by a standard lavage protocol using a nasocystic catheter. Results: All four patients had successful outcomes, and a follow-up at 6 months revealed no traces of the pseudocysts or any significant long-term complications. One acute complication (arterial bleeding) and one late complication (stent migration) were observed. As the study aimed to present a cheaper option for draining pancreatic pseudocysts, we investigated and compared costs for the materials we utilized and those associated with lumen-apposing metal stents. Upon compiling the data, a notable advantage was evident in favour of our method. Conclusions: While EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) represents a high-end strategy for treating pancreatic pseudocysts, our method demonstrates better cost-effectiveness without compromising efficacy.

Top tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage

Top tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage

Endoscopic ultrasound–guided pancreatic duct drainage: a single-center observational study

Background and aimsPancreatic duct obstruction can cause pain and atrophy of the pancreatic parenchyma. Endoscopic drainage is the first-line treatment, usually by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, in some patients, the classic transpapillary approach cannot be performed because of anatomical inability to access the papilla, rupture of the main pancreatic duct, intracanal stones that cannot be crossed or tight stenosis of the main pancreatic duct due to extrinsic compression by parenchymal calcifications. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage is an efficient and minimally invasive therapeutic alternative for these patients. We aimed to evaluate clinical success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage in our center. MethodsData of patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage in our center between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical success was defined as pain ≤2 on the pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) and no recurrence of obstructive pancreatitis after successful stent placement. If the indication to the procedure was chronic pancreatitis with painless weight loss, then clinical success was defined as weight stabilization or weight regain after the procedure. Results46 patients (mean age 58 years old, 69.6% male) were included. Indications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage were chronic pancreatitis in 69.6% of patients (78.1% due to alcohol abuse). Other indications included post-operative complications, rupture of pancreatic duct and pancreatic cancer. Technical success was achieved in 93.5% of patients. 40 patients had pancreaticogastrostomy and 3 patients pancreaticoduodenostomy. The mean hospital stay was 2 days. Clinical success was 93% in patients who achieved technical success. Remaining pain on the VAS > 2 occurred in 9.3% of patients and obstructive pancreatitis recurrence in 6.9%. Adverse event occurred in 5 patients (11.6%). 18 stent dysfunctions were observed, 16 stent migrations and 2 stent obstructions. No patient died from the procedure. ConclusionEndoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage showed a high clinical success rate. It is therefore a good minimally invasive alternative to avoid pancreatic surgery in patients with symptomatic pancreatic duct stenosis of benign or malignant etiology who failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and percutaneous drainage combined with minocycline sclerotherapy for symptomatic hepatic cysts: A retrospective study.

Simple hepatic cysts (SHC) are generally asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed using imaging studies. Asymptomatic SHC does not require treatment, but symptomatic SHC warrants treatment using different modalities, including intravenous antibiotic therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) with sclerotherapy, and surgery. The dissemination of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) intervention techniques has enabled the performance of puncture and drainage via the transgastrointestinal route for intra-abdominal abscesses. Despite the development of an EUS-guided drainage method for treating symptomatic SHC, only a few case reports using this method have been reported. This study retrospectively analyzed the safety and feasibility of EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic SHC as well as its clinical outcomes and compared it with combined therapy using PCD and minocycline sclerotherapy. The records of 10 consecutive patients with 11 symptomatic SHCs treated with either EUS-guided drainage or PCD combined with minocycline sclerotherapy at the Musashino Tokushukai Hospital from August 2019 to January 2024 were retrospectively examined. All cases in both groups achieved technical and clinical success, with no reported adverse events. The median reduction rates of the major cyst diameters in the EUS-guided drainage and PCD with sclerotherapy groups were 100% (interquartile range [IQR]: 94%-100%) and 67% (IQR: 48.5%-85%). The length of hospital stay was 7 and 22.5 days in the EUS-guided and PCD with sclerotherapy groups (P = .01). EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic SHC is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to percutaneous drainage with sclerotherapy and surgery for treating symptomatic SHC.

Feasibility and safety of a novel plastic stent designed specifically for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: a case series

Background/study aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) is emerging as an effective alternative treatment for obstructive pancreatitis after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). However, the high incidence of adverse events associated with EUS-PD (approximately 20%) remains an issue. Recently, we developed a novel plastic stent for EUS-PD, with a radiopaque marker positioned at approximately one-third of the length from the distal end of the stent and side holes positioned exclusively distal to the marker. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using this stent in EUS-PD. Patients/materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-PD with the novel plastic stent at the National Cancer Center Hospital between March 2021 and October 2023. Technical and clinical success, procedure times, adverse events, recurrent pancreatic duct obstruction (RPO), and time to RPO were assessed. Results: Of the ten patients, five had postoperative benign pancreaticojejunal anastomotic strictures and five had malignant pancreatic duct obstruction. The technical and clinical success rates were both 100% (10/10). An adverse event (self-limited abdominal pain) occurred in one (10.0%) patient. Two (20.0%) patients died of their primary disease during the follow-up period (median, 44 days; range, 25–272 days). The incidence of RPO was 10.0% (1/10), and the 3-month non-RPO rate was 83.3%. Conclusion: The novel plastic stent shows potential as a useful and safe tool in EUS-PD.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Guided Biliary Drainage as Primary Approach to Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided transpapillary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to compare the outcomes of these 2 approaches. Electronic databases from January 2005 through December 2023 were searched for RCTs comparing outcomes of EUS-BD and ERCP for treating MDBO. Pooled proportions, risk ratio (RR), and odds ratio were calculated using random-effects models. Five RCTs comprising 519 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled RR for overall technical success with EUS-BD compared with ERCP was 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-1.16, P = 0.246, I2 = 61%) and for clinical success was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.95-1.04, P = 0.850, I2 = 0%). The pooled rate of procedure-related pancreatitis was 7.20% (95% CI = 3.60-13.80, I2 = 34%) in the ERCP group compared with zero in the EUS-BD group. The pooled RR for stent dysfunction with EUS-BD compared with ERCP was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.28-0.83, P = 0.008, I2 = 7%). The weighted mean procedure time was 13.43 (SD = 10.12) minutes for EUS-BD compared with 21.06 (SD = 6.64) minutes for ERCP. The mean stent patency was 194.11 (SD = 52.12) days in the EUS-BD group and 187 (SD = 60.70) days in the ERCP group. EUS-BD is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP in MDBO. An almost nonexistent risk of procedure-related pancreatitis, lower procedure time, and ease of use make this an attractive primary approach to biliary decompression in centers with expertise.

Novel technique of additional anchor plastic stent placement during endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage.

Novel technique of additional anchor plastic stent placement during endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pelvic Abscess Drainage: A Successful Minimally Invasive Approach.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pelvic Abscess Drainage: A Successful Minimally Invasive Approach.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using a forward-viewing echoendoscope after Billroth II gastrectomy.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using a forward-viewing echoendoscope after Billroth II gastrectomy.

Risk factors and treatment strategies for cholecystitis after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study

Background and study aimsCholecystitis can occur after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant biliary obstructions (MBO). Furthermore, the best treatment option for cholecystitis has not been determined. Here, we aimed to identify the risk factors of cholecystitis after SEMS placement and determine the best treatment option. Patients and MethodsIncidence, treatments, and predictive factors of cholecystitis were retrospectively evaluated in 1,084 patients with distal MBO (DMBO) and 353 patients with hilar MBO (HMBO) who underwent SEMS placement at the 12 institutions from January 2012 to March 2021. ResultsCholecystitis occurred in 7.5% of patients with DMBO and 5.9% of patients with HMBO. The recurrence rate was significantly lower (p=0.043), and the recurrence-free period was significantly longer (p=0.039) in endoscopic procedures than in percutaneous procedures for cholecystitis treatment. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) was better in terms of technical success, procedure time, and recurrence-free period than endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage. The cases with obstruction across the cystic duct orifice by tumor (p=0.015) and those with obstruction by stent (p=0.037) were the independent risk factors for cholecystitis in DMBO. The cases with multiple SEMS placements (OR 11, 95% CI 0.68–190, p=0.091) and those with gallbladder stones (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.92–5.6, p=0.075) had a higher risk for cholecystitis in HMBO. ConclusionsThe incidences of cholecystitis after SEMS placement for DMBO and HMBO were comparable. EUS-GBD is the optimal treatment option for patients with cholecystitis after SEMS placement for MBO.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage Using a Novel Dilation Device with Double Guidewire Insertion Function (with Video).

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage Using a Novel Dilation Device with Double Guidewire Insertion Function (with Video).

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Not All Queries Are Already Solved.

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are well-known complications of acute pancreatitis. The overinfection of these collections leads to a worsening of the prognosis with an increase in the morbidity and mortality rate. The primary strategy for managing infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) or symptomatic PFCs is a minimally invasive step-up approach, with endosonography-guided (EUS-guided) transmural drainage and debridement as the preferred and less invasive method. Different stents are available to drain PFCs: self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs), double pigtail stents (DPPSs), or lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs). In particular, LAMSs are useful when direct endoscopic necrosectomy is needed, as they allow easy access to the necrotic cavity; however, the rate of adverse events is not negligible, and to date, the superiority over DPPSs is still debated. Moreover, the timing for necrosectomy, the drainage technique, and the concurrent medical management are still debated. In this review, we focus attention on indications, timing, techniques, complications, and particularly on aspects that remain under debate concerning the EUS-guided drainage of PFCs.

Pigtail trap: Stent migration crisis following endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage.

Watch a video of this article.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage using a forward-viewing echoendoscope for peripancreatic fluid collection after Child resection.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage using a forward-viewing echoendoscope for peripancreatic fluid collection after Child resection.

Enhancing visualization with low echo reduction during endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage.

Enhancing visualization with low echo reduction during endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage.

A Review on Endoscopic Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage.

A percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is the conventionally favored nonoperative intervention for treating acute cholecystitis. However, PCT is beset by high adverse event rates, need for scheduled reintervention, and inadvertent dislodgement, as well as patient dissatisfaction with a percutaneous drain. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy involve the implementation of endoscopic transpapillary drainage (ETP-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), which are increasingly preferred over PCT due to their favorable technical and clinical success combined with lower complication rates. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on EUS-GBD and ETP-GBD, delineating instances when clinicians should opt for endoscopic management and highlighting potential risks associated with each approach.

An unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of a giant cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst.

An unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of a giant cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst.

Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue approach in cases of unsuccessful biliary drainage.

This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management. EUS-GBD is a minimally invasive and effective technique for drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis with high risk of surgery. The procedure has demonstrated impressive technical and clinical success rates with low rates of adverse events, making it a safe and effective option for appropriate candidates. Furthermore, EUS-GBD can also serve as a rescue option for patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS biliary drainage for relief of jaundice in malignant biliary stricture. However, patient selection is critical for the success of EUS-GBD, and proper patient selection and risk assessment are important to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure. As the field continues to evolve and mature, ongoing research will further refine our understanding of the benefits and limitations of EUS-GBD, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for patients.