Endoscopic Transpapillary Drainage Research Articles

A comparative analysis of radiation exposure in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage for acute cholecystitis

A comparative analysis of radiation exposure in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage versus endoscopic transpapillary drainage for acute cholecystitis

Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.

A Review on Endoscopic Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage.

A percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is the conventionally favored nonoperative intervention for treating acute cholecystitis. However, PCT is beset by high adverse event rates, need for scheduled reintervention, and inadvertent dislodgement, as well as patient dissatisfaction with a percutaneous drain. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy involve the implementation of endoscopic transpapillary drainage (ETP-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), which are increasingly preferred over PCT due to their favorable technical and clinical success combined with lower complication rates. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on EUS-GBD and ETP-GBD, delineating instances when clinicians should opt for endoscopic management and highlighting potential risks associated with each approach.

Efficacy and associated factors of endoscopic transpapillary drainage for postoperative biliary leakage.

Adequate biliary decompression is important in treating bile leaks, and endoscopic transpapillary drainage is widely used for this purpose. As an indicator to evaluate the usefulness of endoscopic drainage for postoperative biliary leakage, we focused on external drain removability, which affects quality of life, after endoscopic treatment. Our aim was to clarify the success rate of external tube removal after endoscopic drainage for postoperative biliary leakage and to examine associated factors. This was a multicenter retrospective study; 99 patients with biliary leakage at 13 institutions were enrolled between April 2014 and March 2019. Among these patients, 66 who were initially treated with endoscopic interventions for biliary leakage after cholecystectomy (n = 17) or hepatectomy (n = 49) were reviewed. In post-cholecystectomy biliary leakage, the external-drain-free rate at first endoscopic intervention was 100%, and the drains, including transpapillary stents, were successfully removed in almost all cases (16/17). In contrast, in post-hepatectomy biliary leakage, the external-drain-free rate was 44.9% (22/49), with all 22 of those patients eventually becoming entirely drain-free. A lower body mass index was the only significant factor associated with freedom from external drainage in post-hepatectomy biliary leakage (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.65). Initial endoscopic treatment was effective for post-cholecystectomy biliary leakage, while approximately half of the patients with post-hepatectomy biliary leakage required multidisciplinary management. Achieving freedom from external drainage contributes to patients' quality of life and may be a predictor of treatment response after endoscopic therapy for postoperative biliary leakage.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Trans-esophageal Transmural Drainage of Mediastinal Pseudocysts: A Case Series

Mediastinal pseudocysts (MP) are rare, and surgery is the conventional treatment modality. However, in the last decade, excellent outcomes have been reported with endoscopic transpapillary drainage. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided trans-esophageal transmural drainage of MP is a minimally invasive and effective non-surgical treatment modality, but the experience is limited. We aimed to report our experience of EUS-guided transmural drainage in 10 patients with MP's. A retrospective analysis of patients with pancreatic fluid collections treated with EUS-guided transmural drainage over the last ten years was completed to to identify patients with MP's. Ten patients (8 males, with a mean age of 34.9±9.17 years) with MP treated with EUS-guided transesophageal transmural drainage were identified. Nine patients with MP had concurrent chronic pancreatitis, and only one had MP following acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The mean size of MP was 5.70±1.64 cm, and nine patients (90%) had concurrent abdominal pseudocyst. EUS-guided transesophageal transmural drainage was technically successful in all ten patients. Transmural plastic stents were placed in 9 patients, whereas one patient underwent single-time complete aspiration of the MP. There were no immediate or delayed procedure-related complications. All ten patients had a successful outcome, with the mean resolution time being 2.80±0.79 weeks. There has been no recurrence of PFC or symptoms in nine (90%) successfully treated patients over a mean follow-up period of 43.3 months. EUS-guided trans-esophageal drainage of MP is safe with a high technical and clinical success rate.

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy of a difficult-to-access biliary obstruction involving the caudate lobe (with video).

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has been increasingly used as an alternative approach to percutaneous biliary drainage after failed transpapillary drainage.[1,2] EUS-HGS is often performed via the B2 or B3 bile ducts due to the proximity of these biliary branches with the stomach. The B1 bile duct at the caudate lobe is considered one of the difficult-to-access bile ducts for percutaneous biliary drainage given its distance from the skin surface. EUS is advantageous in accessing the B1 bile duct given its proximity to the stomach;[3-5] however, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported performing EUS-HGS via the B1 bile duct. Herein, we report a case where biliary obstruction involving the B1 bile duct was successfully managed via EUS-HGS. A 97-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for fever and abdominal pain. She had a history of recurrent cholangitis due to benign sclerosing cholangitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed intrahepatic bile duct dilation in the caudate lobe [Figure 1]. Initially, endoscopic transpapillary drainage was attempted; however, due to severe stricture, the B1 bile duct was not visualized by the cholangiogram. Subsequently, EUS-HGS was planned. Clockwise rotation of the echoendoscope after identification of the lateral liver lobe from the stomach enabled the clear visualization of the B1 bile duct [Figure 2]. The dilated B1 bile duct was punctured using a 19-gauge aspiration needle [Figure 3], and the puncture tract was dilated using a bougie dilator. A dedicated 7-Fr × 14-cm plastic stent (TYPE-IT Stent; Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was deployed between the B1 bile duct and stomach [Figure 4 and Video 1]. The patient’s condition improved within a few days, and MRI performed after the procedure revealed a well-drained B1 bile duct [Figure 5]. Currently, cholangitis has not recurred over 6 months after the procedure.Figure 1: Magnetic resonance imaging showing biliary dilation of the B1 bile duct localized at the caudate lobe (arrowheads)Figure 2: EUS shows the B1 bile duct via the gastric wall by clockwise rotation of the echoendoscope after identification of the lateral liver lobe (arrowheads)Figure 3: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy for the B1 bile duct. The dilated B1 bile duct was punctured with a 19-gauge aspiration needle. (a) EUS image; (b) fluoroscopic imageFigure 4: A dedicated 7-Fr × 14-cm plastic stent (TYPE-IT Stent; Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was successfully deployed between the B1 bile duct and stomach. (a) Endoscopic image; (b) fluoroscopic imageFigure 5: MRI showing a well-drained B1 bile duct. MRI (a) before and (b) after drainage. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video Clip 1","caption":"","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_x2u5iac6"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} This case highlighted the usefulness of an alternative EUS approach to the B1 bile duct, which is generally difficult to approach percutaneously. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Endoscopic transpapillary drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis with complete main pancreatic duct disruption by metallic stent placement: A retrospective study.

Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a serious complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) and may lead to disruption of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Endoscopic passive transpapillary drainage (PTD) is an effective method for treating MPD disruptions. However, WOPN with complete MPD disruption is usually accompanied by disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS), especially with infected necrosis. Endoscopic PTD with a fully covered self-expanding metallic stent (FCSEMS) and a plastic stent placement may have the potential for future application in treating complete MPD disruption in patients with WOPN. Patients with WOPN caused by ANP were classified according to the 2012 Atlanta classification and definition. In all patients, ERCP was performed 2 times. First, 3 patients were diagnosed with complete MPD disruption by ERCP. At the time of diagnosis, a plastic pancreatic stent (7Fr) was placed. Second, they underwent endoscopic PTD for WOPN with complete MPD disruption in which an FCSEMS and plastic stent placement were the only access routes to the necrotic cavity. The etiology of pancreatitis in these patients was of biliary, lipogenic, and alcoholic origin. The WOPN lesion size ranged from 6.5 to 10.2 cm in this study, and the type of WOPN was mixed in two cases and central in one case. The type of MPD disruption was complete in all three patients. The locations of disruption included the pancreatic body and head. The time from occurrence to the first ERCP was 18, 23, and 26 days, respectively. The main symptoms were abdominal pain, abdominal distention, fever, gastrointestinal obstruction, and/or weight loss. The three patients with symptomatic WOPN and MPD disruption underwent endoscopic PTD with FCSEMS and plastic pancreatic stent placement. Technical and therapeutic successes were achieved in 3/3 of patients. The mean time of stenting was 28-93 days. The clinical symptoms connected with WOPN and collection disappeared postoperatively in all three patients. During the follow-up period of 4-18 months, no patient developed collection recurrence or other complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding or reinfection. All patients recovered uneventfully. In patients with WOPN with complete MPD disruption, endoscopic PTD with FCSEMSs and plastic stent placement may be an effective and safe method of treatment.

An Atypical Complication of Chronic Pancreatitis

An Atypical Complication of Chronic Pancreatitis

Early endoscopic transpapillary drainage through the minor papilla in the treatment of acute pancreatitis.

To explore the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary drainage through the minor papilla in the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary drainage via the minor papilla among AP patients who were treated in our hospital from September 2018 to March 2020. The present study included 18 patients (12 males and 6 females). All patients successfully received endoscopic transpapillary drainage via the minor papilla and were discharged upon recovery. No patient died, received ICU treatment, or had endoscopic operation-related complications. Two patients (11.11%) received additional abdominal paracentesis due to local complications. Fifteen patients (83.33%) resumed oral feeding within 3 days. The postoperative 24-hour leukocyte level, APACHE II score, serum amylase level, and lipase level significantly decreased compared with those at admission. The median hospitalization stay was 5 (3.75-9) days. The median hospitalization cost was 25,123.82 (22,942.50-43,874.68) RMB. The patients were followed up at 6-24 months, during which 4 patients (22.22%) had recurrence. Two patients had recurrence after pancreatic duct removal and other 2 patients in the period of carrying ducts. Early endoscopic transpapillary drainage via the minor papilla in cases of difficult cannulation or stenting via the major papilla is safe and effective in the treatment of AP, and is worthy of further popularization.

Factors Associated With Successful Fistula Dilation in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage

BACKGROUND AND AIMSEndoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an effective treatment for biliary obstruction comparable to endoscopic transpapillary drainage. However, fistula dilation is a critical step of EUS-BD. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with successful fistula dilation. METHODSThis observational study enrolled malignant biliary obstruction patients who underwent EUS-BD between May 2005 and April 2022. The factors (period, past history of gastrectomy, stricture part of biliary duct, method of EUS-BD, diameter of the punctured bile duct, distance of puncture route, needle diameter, guidewire diameter, guidewire position, dilator device, state of the scope and devices) associated with successful fistula dilation were investigated. RESULTSDeep placement of the guidewire into another segment of the bile duct (from the common bile duct [CBD] to the right or left hepatic duct, from B3 or B2 to the right hepatic duct or CBD) was the only factor significantly associated with successful fistula dilation (odds ratio 33.5; 95% CI 2.2-510, P = 0.01) in multivariate analysis. The other factors were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONFor successful fistula dilation, guidewires should be deeply advanced to another area. In EUS-hepaticoenterostomy, the guidewire should be advanced to the right hepatic duct or CBD. In EUS-choledochoduodenostomy, the guidewire should be advanced to the right or left hepatic duct.

Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases.

ObjectivesThe transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP‐D) cannot be performed without fluoroscopy, and there are many situations in which fluoroscopy is required even in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided drainage (EUS‐D). Previous studies have compared the efficacy, but not the radiation exposure of EUS‐D and ERCP‐D. While radiation exposure in ERCP‐D has been previously evaluated, there is a paucity of information regarding radiation doses in EUS‐D. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in EUS‐D compared with that in ERCP‐D.MethodsThis retrospective single‐center cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS‐D and ERCP‐D between October 2017 and March 2019. The air kerma (AK, mGy), kerma‐area product (KAP, Gycm2), fluoroscopy time (FT, min), and procedure time (PT, min) were assessed. The invasive probability weighting method was used to qualify the comparisons.ResultsWe enrolled 372 and 105 patients who underwent ERCP‐D and EUS‐D, respectively. The mean AK, KAP, and FT in the EUS‐D group were higher by 53%, 28%, and 27%, respectively, than those in the ERCP‐D group, whereas PT was shorter by approximately 11% (AK, 135.0 vs. 88.4; KAP, 28.1 vs. 21.9; FT, 20.4 vs. 16.0; PT, 38.7 vs. 43.5). The sub‐analysis limited to biliary drainage cases showed the same trend (AK, 128.3 vs. 90.9; KAP, 27.0 vs. 22.2; FT, 16.4 vs. 16.1; PT, 32.5 vs. 44.4).ConclusionsThis is the first study to assess radiation exposure in EUS‐D compared with that in ERCP‐D. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in EUS‐D than in ERCP‐D, despite the shorter procedure time.

Závažné krvácení jako komplikace endoskopické choledokho-duodenální drenáže pomocí LAMS (Hot-Axios) při léčbě distální stenózy běžného žlučovodu v důsledku adenokarcinomu hlavy slinivky břišní

Introduction: Endoscopic transpapillary drainage is a common method of solving malignant biliary obstruction. An alternative to the transpapillary approach is endosonographically guided biliary drainage using a lumen-apposition stent, which can be used not only in case of ERCP failure. Case report: We describe our experience with endosonographically guided choledocho-duodenal drainage using a lumen-apposition stent, which was complicated by delayed hemobilia. Persistent and severe bleeding was successfully resolved by endovascular embolization using a spiral coiling. Conclusion: Endosonographically guided drainage using a lumen-apposition stent may, despite all advantages, be accompanied by serious complications, including significant bleeding. Therefore, the availability of an interventional radiology unit is appropriate.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage for treating a traumatic main pancreatic duct injury in a child

Abstract A 10-year-old Japanese boy presented the day after a bicycle handlebar injury with mild abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed pancreatic transection and possible main pancreatic duct (MPD) injury because of a fluid collection around the pancreas. Conservative management (fasting, antibiotics, total parental nutrition, protease inhibitor) was initially successful, but an oral challenge with plain water on day 23 caused a relapse. CT identified a pancreatic pseudocyst. Endoscopic trans-papillary drainage was attempted but failed because the MPD was completely obstructed. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of the pseudocyst with a lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) was performed on day 29 via the stomach. On day 36, EUS-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) with a 5Fr plastic stent was performed via the stomach with rapid improvement in symptoms and elevated enzyme levels. Repeat oral challenge on day 39 was successful, the LAMS was removed on day 59 without recurrence. He was discharged well on day 69 and remains asymptomatic 20 months after treatment. Our case highlights the potential of minimally invasive endoscopic procedures as options for the non-surgical management of complete MPD disruption in a child. However, further research to develop dedicated pediatric endoscopic devices is required.

Conversion of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

IntroductionPercutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a useful alternative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) when patients have difficulty with endoscopic transpapillary drainage. We examined the feasibility of conversion of PTBD to endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biliary drainage (EUS‐BD) in patients with MBO unsuited for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent conversion of PTBD to EUS‐BD between March 2017 and December 2019. Eligible patients had unresectable MBO, required palliative biliary drainage, and were not suited for endoscopic transpapillary drainage. Initial PTBD had been performed for acute cholangitis or obstructive jaundice in all patients. EUS‐BD was performed following improvements in cholangitis. Sixteen patients underwent conversion of PTBD to EUS‐BD. We evaluated technical success, procedure time, clinical success (defined as subsequent external catheter removal), adverse events (AEs), time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), and re‐intervention rates.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all patients (100%). The median procedure time was 45.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 30.0–50.0 minutes). Clinical success was achieved in all patients (100%). There were mild early AEs in two patients (12.5%) (acute cholangitis: 1, bile peritonitis: 1), which improved with antibiotic administration alone. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in six patients (37.5%). Kaplan‐Meier analysis revealed a 50% TRBO of 95 days (IQR 41–246 days). Endoscopic treatment was possible in all RBO cases, and repeat PTBD was not required.ConclusionsConversion of PTBD to EUS‐BD for the management of MBO is both feasible and safe. This approach is expected to be widely practiced at centers with little experience in EUS‐BD.

Successful treatment with endoscopic transpapillary drainage for gallbladder perforation associated with steroid treatment for interstitial pneumonia (with video).

This case report highlights the clinical efficacy of endoscopic transpapillary drainage for gallbladder perforation in a high-risk surgical patient with a history of steroid treatment for interstitial pneumonia. The usefulness of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis has not been established. In difficult cases of emergent surgery, such as described here, endoscopic transpapillary drainage is a promising method to manage gallbladder perforation and acute cholecystitis recurrence.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, transpapillary drainage, or percutaneous drainage in high risk acute cholecystitis patients: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUSGBD) are alternatives to percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PCGBD) for patients with acute cholecystitis who are unfit for surgery. Data comparing these modalities are limited and have reported conflicting results. We searched multiple databases from inception to May 2019 to identify studies that reported on ETGBD, EUSGBD, and PCGBD in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients with a high surgical risk. Aims were to compare the pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and disease recurrence. 1223 patients (22 studies), 557 patients (14 studies), and 13 351 patients (46 studies) were treated by ETGBD, EUSGBD, and PCGBD, respectively. The pooled technical and clinical successes were: ETGBD 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 80.1 - 85.5, I 2 = 29) and 88.1 % (95 %CI 83.6 - 91.4, I 2 = 50), respectively; EUSGBD 95.3 % (95 %CI 92.8 - 96.9, I 2 = 0) and 96.7 % (95 %CI 94.0 - 98.2, I 2 = 0), respectively; and PCGBD 98.7 % (95 %CI 98.0 - 99.1, I 2 = 0) and 89.3 % (95 %CI 86.6 - 91.5, I 2 = 84), respectively. Clinical success with EUSGBD was significantly superior to the other approaches. All complications were comparable between the groups. Pancreatitis occurred with ETGBD in 5.1 % (95 %CI 3.5 - 7.3), whereas bleeding and perforation occurred with EUSGBD in 4.3 % (95 %CI 2.7 - 6.8) and 3.7 % (95 %CI 2.3 - 6.0), respectively. Stent migration occurred with PCGBD in 7.4 % (95 %CI 5.5 - 10.0). EUSGBD demonstrated better clinical success than ETGBD and PCGBD in the management of acute cholecystitis patients at high surgical risk.

Local instilation of antibiotics through nasocystic catheter for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis: Can necrosectomy be avoided?

Pseudoaneurysms associated with pancreatic pseudocysts are different from simple, isolated pancreatic pseudoaneurysms and there is paucity of published data on their non surgical treatment.To retrospectively analyze results of combination of angioembolisation or thrombin injection followed by endoscopic transpapillary drainage for management of pseudoaneurysms associated with pancreatic pseudocysts.Eight patients (all males; mean age ± SD: 31.2 ± 6.1 years; age range: 21–38 years) underwent radiological management of the pseudoaneurysm followed by endoscopic drainage of the pseudocysts.All patients had pseudocysts (median size 4 cm) with underlying chronic pancreatitis. All patients had abdominal pain on presentation and 7/8 (87.5%) patients had presented with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. The size of the pseudoaneurysms varied from 1 to 4 cm. Two patients were treated with percutaneous thrombin injection whereas six patients underwent digital subtraction angiography and angioembolisation. All patients underwent successful endoscopic transpapillary drainage through the major (5) or minor papilla (3) and resolution of pseudocysts was noted within 6 weeks (median 4 weeks). No significant complication of the procedure was noted in any of the patients.Pseudoaneurysms associated with pancreatic pseudocysts can be successfully and safely treated with a combination of radiological obliteration of the pseudoaneurysm followed by endoscopic transpapillary drainage.

Gall Bladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis in Surgically Unfit Patients: Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Transmural Drainage or Endoscopic Transpapillary Drainage!

AbstractAcute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially serious condition that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice of AC in surgically fit candidates. However, high-risk surgical patients with AC are a therapeutic dilemma. Various alternative treatment options available include percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy (PTC), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gall bladder (GB) drainage or endoscopic transpapillary drainage of GB. Due to higher complication, unplanned hospital readmission rate, risk of tube dislodgement, and high risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis associated with PTC, endoscopic drainage GB is the preferred, minimally invasive treatment option. Both endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage as well as EUS-guided transmural drainage of GB are effective GB drainage options, but both of them have not been compared in terms of their efficacy and safety. In this news and views, we have discussed two interesting articles which have compared EUS-guided GB drainage and endoscopic transpapillary drainage.

Successful treatment of pancreatic fistula for reconstructing the intestinal tract with endoscopic transpapillary drainage: A case report

Successful treatment of pancreatic fistula for reconstructing the intestinal tract with endoscopic transpapillary drainage: A case report

Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage.

Feasibility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary drainage is not always applicable due to anatomical alterations or to inability to access the papilla. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage has always been considered the only alternative for this indication. However, endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage represents a valid option to replace percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage when ERCP fails. According to the access site to the biliary tree, two kinds of approaches may be described: the intrahepatic and the extrahepatic. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided rendez-vous transpapillary drainage is performed where the second portion of the duodenum is easily reached but conventional ERCP fails. The recent introduction of self-expandable metal stents and lumen-apposing metal stents has improved this field. However, the role of the latter is still controversial. Echoendoscopic transmural biliary drainage can be challenging with potential severe adverse events. Therefore, trained endoscopists, in both ERCP and endoscopic ultrasonography are needed with surgical and radiological backup.