Endoscopic Surveillance Of Patients Research Articles

Cold snaring biopsies to increase screening efficacy during endoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk of diffuse gastric cancer.

Cold snaring biopsies to increase screening efficacy during endoscopic surveillance of patients at high risk of diffuse gastric cancer.

244. A NOVEL SERUM GLYCOPROTEIN BIOMARKER PANEL FOR SCREENING OF ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA AND SURVEILLANCE OF BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS

Abstract Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has become the predominant type of esophageal cancer in Western countries and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor of EAC. Early diagnosis and intervention of EAC significantly reduces the disease mortality. Endoscopic surveillance in patients with BE is costly and remains controversial as an EAC screening test at the population level. This study aims to develop a simple blood test to allow close surveillance of EAC in patients with BE and screening EAC at a large population level. Methods A total of 298 serum samples were obtained from two independent cohorts recruited in Australia (N = 249) and the US (N = 49) from four groups: healthy controls, BE-low/no dysplasia, BE-high dysplasia and EAC. Thirty-three candidate glycoprotein peptides were measured by mass spectrometry after lectin pulldown. The Australian cohort was used as the development cohort. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop diagnostic models to distinguish different disease status, followed by a forward stepwise approach. Diagnostic models were further validated in the US cohort. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) and sensitivity, specificity of each model determined. Results Seven glycoproteins were found to be significantly associated with EAC. A series of diagnostic models were developed to distinguish different disease status, with AUCs ranging from 0.72 to 0.84 in the development cohort and from 0.79 to 0.94 in the validation cohort. After adjusting for age and sex, biomarker models showed good discrimination and can distinguish patients with EAC from control group (AUC = 0.75 in development cohort and AUC = 0.94 in validation cohort). Biomarker models can also distinguish patients who require endoscopic interventions (including patients with EAC and BE with high dysplasia) from participants in the control group (AUC = 0.72 in development cohort and AUC = 0.79 the validation cohort). Conclusion A panel of serum glycoprotein biomarkers were identified associated with EAC and BE with high dysplasia, with good discrimination of disease status. These biomarkers have potential utility as a simple blood test that could be used for screening EAC in a large population, and for surveillance disease progression in patients with BE.

GERD as a Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The incidence of obesity is increasing in developed societies, and surgical treatment is one treatment option. The most common surgical treatment for obesity is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complication of both obesity and the surgical treatment of obesity. In this study, the PubMed database was searched using the keywords "GERD" and "bariatric surgery", and 987 papers published between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022 were retrieved. Nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The articles were analyzed for the de novo occurrence of GERD after the treatment of its symptoms, the occurrence of erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. In addition, interesting conclusions are presented from the papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria but shed light on the pathophysiology of GERD in obese patients undergoing LSG. In conclusion, the authors draw attention to the need for endoscopic surveillance in patients undergoing LSG, even in the absence of clinical signs of GERD.

SAT-539 - Baveno VII algorithm can avoid endoscopic surveillance in patients with cirrhosis

SAT-539 - Baveno VII algorithm can avoid endoscopic surveillance in patients with cirrhosis

Importance of Early Surveillance Endoscopy in Patients at a High Risk of Gastric Cancer

Importance of Early Surveillance Endoscopy in Patients at a High Risk of Gastric Cancer

Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients with the Highest Risk of Gastric Cancer: Challenges and Solutions.

Gastric cancer is one of the most significant causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recognized modifiable risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, geographic location, select dietary factors, tobacco use and alcohol consumption. In addition, multiple hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are associated with significantly elevated gastric cancer risk. Endoscopic surveillance in hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes has the potential to identify gastric cancer at earlier and more treatable stages, as well as to prevent development of gastric cancer through identification of precancerous lesions. However, much uncertainty remains regarding use of endoscopic surveillance in hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes, including whether or not it should be routinely performed, the surveillance interval and age of initiation, cost-effectiveness, and whether surveillance ultimately improves survival from gastric cancer for these high-risk individuals. In this review, we outline the hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes associated with the highest gastric cancer risks. Additionally, we cover current evidence and guidelines addressing hereditary gastric cancer risk and surveillance in these syndromes, along with current challenges and limitations that emphasize a need for continued research in this field.

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett’s Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications

Pernicious Anemia: The Hematological Presentation of a Multifaceted Disorder Caused by Cobalamin Deficiency.

Pernicious anemia is still a neglected disorder in many medical contexts and is underdiagnosed in many patients. Pernicious anemia is linked to but different from autoimmune gastritis. Pernicious anemia occurs in a later stage of autoimmune atrophic gastritis when gastric intrinsic factor deficiency and consequent vitamin B12 deficiency may occur. The multifaceted nature of pernicious anemia is related to the important role of cobalamin, which, when deficient, may lead to several dysfunctions, and thus, the proteiform clinical presentations of pernicious anemia. Indeed, pernicious anemia may lead to potentially serious long-term complications related to micronutrient deficiencies and their consequences and the development of gastric cancer and type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. When not recognized in a timely manner or when pernicious anemia is diagnosed with delay, these complications may be potentially life-threatening and sometimes irreversible. The current review aimed to focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical presentations of pernicious anemia in an attempt to look beyond borders of medical specialties. It aimed to focus on micronutrient deficiencies besides the well-known vitamin B12 deficiency, the diagnostic approach for pernicious anemia, its long-term complications and optimal clinical management, and endoscopic surveillance of patients with pernicious anemia.

AGA Institute Quality Measure Development for the Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia With Helicobacter pylori

AGA Institute Quality Measure Development for the Management of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia With Helicobacter pylori

Machine learning–based personalized prediction of gastric cancer incidence using the endoscopic and histologic findings at the initial endoscopy

Accurate risk stratification for gastric cancer is required for optimal endoscopic surveillance in patients with chronic gastritis. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that incorporates endoscopic and histologic findings for an individualized prediction of gastric cancer incidence. We retrospectively evaluated 1099 patients with chronic gastritis who underwent EGD and biopsy samplingof the gastric mucosa. Patients were randomly divided into training and test sets (4:1). We constructed a conventional Cox proportional hazard model and 3 ML models. Baseline characteristics, endoscopic atrophy, and Operative Link on Gastritis-Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM)/Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) stage at initial EGD were comprehensively assessed. Model performance was evaluated using Harrel's c-index. During a mean follow-up of 5.63 years, 94 patients (8.55%) developed gastric cancer. The gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT) model achieved the best performance (c-index from the test set, .84) and showed high discriminative ability in stratifying the test set into 3 risk categories (P< .001). Age, OLGIM/OLGA stage, endoscopic atrophy, and history of malignant tumors other than gastric cancer were important predictors of gastric cancer incidence in the GBDT model. Furthermore, the proposed GBDT model enabled the generation of a personalized cumulative incidence prediction curve for each patient. We developed a novel ML model that incorporates endoscopic and histologic findings at initial EGD for personalized risk prediction of gastric cancer. This model may lead to the development of effective and personalized follow-up strategies after initial EGD.

Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

1: ESGE suggests performing segmental biopsies (at least two from each segment), which should be placed in different specimen containers (ileum, cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and rectum) in patients with clinical and endoscopic signs of colitis.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends taking two biopsies from the right hemicolon (ascending and transverse colon) and, in a separate container, two biopsies from the left hemicolon (descending and sigmoid colon) when microscopic colitis is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends pancolonic dye-based chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies of any visible lesions during surveillance endoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 4: ESGE suggests that, in high risk patients with a history of colonic neoplasia, tubular-appearing colon, strictures, ongoing therapy-refractory inflammation, or primary sclerosing cholangitis, chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies can be combined with four-quadrant non-targeted biopsies every 10 cm along the colon. Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, if pouch surveillance for dysplasia is performed, visible abnormalities should be biopsied, with at least two biopsies systematically taken from each of the afferent ileal loop, the efferent blind loop, the pouch, and the anorectal cuff.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends that, in patients with known ulcerative colitis and endoscopic signs of inflammation, at least two biopsies be obtained from the worst affected areas for the assessment of activity or the presence of cytomegalovirus; for those with no evident endoscopic signs of inflammation, advanced imaging technologies may be useful in identifying areas for targeted biopsies to assess histologic remission if this would have therapeutic consequences. Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 7: ESGE suggests not biopsying endoscopically visible inflammation or normal-appearing mucosa to assess disease activity in known Crohn's disease.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that adequately assessed colorectal polyps that are judged to be premalignant should be fully excised rather than biopsied.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends that, where endoscopically feasible, potentially malignant colorectal polyps should be excised en bloc rather than being biopsied. If the endoscopist cannot confidently perform en bloc excision at that time, careful representative images (rather than biopsies) should be taken of the potential focus of cancer, and the patient should be rescheduled or referred to an expert center.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends that, in malignant lesions not amenable to endoscopic excision owing to deep invasion, six carefully targeted biopsies should be taken from the potential focus of cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

Chromoendoscopy Is Not Superior to White Light Endoscopy in Improving Adenoma Detection in Lynch Syndrome Cohort Undergoing Surveillance with High-Resolution Colonoscopy: A Real-World Evidence Study

Background: Endoscopic surveillance in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is crucial due to a genetically based high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between high-resolution white light endoscopy (WLE) alone and WLE plus dye chromoendoscopy (CE) in a cohort of LS patients. Methods: In a context of real-world data, we retrospectively enrolled 50 LS patients who had non-randomly undergone WLE versus CE surveillance examinations from 2007 to 2019. The 2 groups were compared at baseline (BL) in terms of the rate of patients with lesions and the number of lesions, and at follow-up (FU), to evaluate a possible enhanced detection rate. Longitudinal analysis of the effect of the endoscopy type on the main outcomes was performed by generalized linear mixed models. Results: Forty-two patients had undergone at least one diagnostic colonoscopy. At BL and at FU analysis, we found no significant differences in detection rates and clinical-pathological features between WLE and CE groups. At the longitudinal analysis, an increase in the endoscopy rank (i.e., the position of each colonoscopy for all the colonoscopies that a patient had undergone) was associated with an increase in polyp detection rate (p = 0.006) and ADR (p = 0.005), while a trend toward significance (p = 0.069) was found for endoscopy type (CE vs. WLE) in the detection of serrated lesions. Conclusions: CE is not superior to high-resolution WLE in increasing the ADR. Even under standard WLE, an active and careful endoscopic surveillance of LS patients can prevent CRC.

Gastric intestinal metaplasia: when to treat? How to treat?

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is an attractive target for surveillance and treatment as it can progress to gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Yet, GIM remains a challenging area for clinicians as most patients do not progress to cancer, and there are conflicting data regarding the benefits of surveillance and therapy. This review aims to summarize recently published GIM surveillance guidelines, to discuss, which patients with GIM may benefit from treatment, and to review pivotal and recent literature on GIM therapy. Guidelines published by American, British, and European gastroenterology societies do not recommend universal surveillance, but do suggest endoscopic surveillance in patients with risk factors for progression to GAC. Although light examination for at least 7 min and mapping biopsies may increase yield for dysplasia and GAC. In randomized trials, Helicobacter pylori eradication reduced risk of dysplasia and cancer. In GIM with visible dysplasia and early-stage GAC, endoscopic resection improves quality of life without reducing survival compared with surgery. Endoscopic ablation therapies have shown promise for invisible or extensive dysplasia. Endoscopic resection is appropriate for visible dysplasia and early-stage GAC without high-risk features that persists despite H. pylori eradication therapy. Prospective studies are needed to assess the utility of endoscopic ablation in GIM.

Influence of chronic inflammation on the malignant phenotypes and the plasticity of colorectal cancer cells

Sporadic adenoma or adenocarcinoma is often detected during endoscopic surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is occasionally difficult to distinguish these neoplasms from dysplasia or colitis-associated cancers because of the influence of inflammation. However, the influence of inflammation on sporadic neoplasms is not well characterised. To assess this influence, we established a long-term inflammation model of colon cancer cells by inflammatory stimulation with tumour necrosis factor-α, flagellin and interleukin-1β for 60 weeks. Then, the malignant phenotypes were evaluated using the MTS assay, Annexin V fluorescence assay, cell migration assay and sphere formation assay. The influence of P53 function on these phenotypes was assessed with a TP53 mutation model using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. A long-term inflammation model of LS174T cells was established for the first time with continuous inflammatory signalling. Chronic inflammation induced apoptosis and suppressed the proliferation and stemness of these cancer cells via the action of P53. It also enhanced the invasiveness of LS174T cells. Moreover, these phenotypic changes and changes in inflammatory signalling were recoverable after the removal of inflammatory stimuli, suggesting that colon cancer cells have higher plasticity than normal intestinal epithelial cells. In conclusion, our results suggest that sporadic neoplasms in patients with UC are affected by chronic inflammation but are not essentially altered.

Detection of Barrett's Neoplasia with Near-Infrared Fluorescent Heterodimeric Peptide: Feasibility Results from a Phase 1 Study

Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma is a molecularly heterogeneous disease that is rising rapidly in incidence and has a poor prognosis. Current methods of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) using white light illumination are not sensitive to pre-malignant lesions that are flat in appearance and patchy in distribution. We aim to demonstrate specific binding by a peptide heterodimer to Barrett’s neoplasia in human subjects. Methods: Peptide monomers specific for EGFR and ErbB2 were arranged in a heterodimer configuration and labeled with IRDye800. The near-infrared (NIR)-labeled heterodimer was synthesized using current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) methods and performed pharmacology/toxicology study in animals using good laboratory practices (GLP). The NIR contrast agent was topically administered in the distal esophagus of patients with history of neoplastic BE undergoing endoscopic therapy or surveillance. Fluorescence images were collected using a flexible fiber accessory passed through the instrument channel of an upper endoscope. Fluorescence images were collected from n = 31 BE patients, and a deep learning model was used to segment the target (T) and background (B) regions to calculate the T/B ratio. Findings: Between August 2018 and November 2020, 25 human subjects were enrolled for safety study and 31 patients for either evaluation or therapy of Barrett’s neoplasia were recruited for imaging study. No adverse events attributed to the heterodimer were found. The mean T/B ratio in patients for HGD and EAC were significantly greater than that for BE with low grade dysplasia, without dysplasia, or squamous mucosa. At a T/B ratio of 1.5, 94.1% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity for detection of Barrett’s neoplasia was achieved with an AUC = 0.95. The presence of Barrett’s neoplasia was validated by pathological assessment of resected specimens. Interpretation: This “first-in-human” clinical study demonstrates feasibility to detect early Barrett’s neoplasia using a NIR-labeled peptide heterodimer. Trial Registration: This study was registered online at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03643068) Funding National Institutes of Health. Declaration of Interest: Authors (JC, TDW) are inventors on patents filed by the University of Michigan on the peptide heterodimer used in this study. Author (EJS) is an inventor on patents filed by the University of Washington on the multimodal scanning fiber endoscope (mmSFE) used in this study. The other authors disclose no conflicts. Ethical Approval: All study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Michigan Medicine

Perceptions on the management of varices and on the use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis among GI specialists in Austria

SummaryBackgroundPortal hypertension (PH) causes severe complications in patients with liver cirrhosis, such as variceal bleeding and ascites; however, data on the knowledge and perceptions on guideline recommendations for the management of varices and the use of albumin is scarce.MethodsWe designed two structured surveys on (i) the management of varices and (ii) the use of albumin for Austrian physicians of specialized Gastro-Intestinal (GI) centers. The interviewed physicians were confronted spontaneously and provided ad hoc responses to the questionnaire.ResultsIn total, 158 surveys were completed. Interestingly, many specialists (30%) would recommend a follow-up gastroscopy after 1 year in patients with compensated cirrhosis without varices (i.e., overtreatment). For small varices, 81.5% would use non-selective beta blockers (NSBB) for primary prophylaxis (PP). For PP in patients with large varices, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus NSBB was preferred by 51.4% (i.e., overtreatment). Knowledge on the indication criteria for early TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) was reported by 54.3%, but only 20% could report these criteria correctly. The majority (87.1%) correctly indicated a preference to use NSBB and EBL for secondary prophylaxis (SP).The majority of participating gastroenterologists reported no restrictions on the use of albumin (89.8%) in their hospitals. Of the interviewed specialists, 63.6% would use albumin in patients with SBP; however, only 11.4% would use the doses recommended by guidelines. The majority of specialists indicated using albumin at the recommended doses for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI, 86.4%) and for large volume paracentesis (LVP, 73.3%). The individual responses regarding albumin use for infections/sepsis, hyponatremia, renal impairment, and encephalopathy were heterogeneous.ConclusionThe reported management of PH and varices is mostly adherent to guidelines, but endoscopic surveillance in patients without varices is too intense and EBL is overused in the setting of PP. Knowledge on the correct use of early TIPS must be improved among Austrian specialists. Albumin use is widely unrestricted in Austria; however, albumin is often underdosed in established indications.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00508-020-01769-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP OF BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition that raises controversy among general practitioners and specialists, especially regarding its diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up protocols. This systematic review aims to present the particularities and to clarify controversies related to the diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of BE. A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and SciELO based on articles published in the last 10 years. PRISMA guidelines were followed and the search was made using MeSH and non-MeSH terms "Barrett" and "diagnosis or treatment or therapy or surveillance". We searched for complete randomized controlled clinical trials or Phase IV studies, carried out with individuals over 18 years old. A total of 42 randomized controlled trials were selected after applying all inclusion and exclusion criteria. A growing trend of alternative and safer techniques to traditional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were identified, which could improve the detection of BE and patient acceptance. The use of chromoendoscopy-guided biopsy protocols significantly reduced the number of biopsies required to maintain similar BE detection rates. Furthermore, the value of BE chemoprophylaxis with esomeprazole and acetylsalicylic acid was relevant, as well as the establishment of protocols for the follow-up and endoscopic surveillance of patients with BE based predominantly on the presence and degree of dysplasia, as well as on the length of the follow-up affected by BE. Although further studies regarding the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of BE are warranted, in light of the best evidence presented in the last decade, there is a trend towards electronic chromoendoscopy-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of BE, while treatment should encompass endoscopic techniques such as radiofrequency ablation. Risks of ablative endoscopic methods should be weighted against those of resective surgery. It is also important to consider lifetime endoscopic follow-up for both short and long term BE patients, with consideration to limitations imposed by a range of comorbidities. Unfortunately, there are no randomized controlled trials that have evaluated which is the best recommendation for BE follow-up and endoscopic surveillance (>1 cm) protocols, however, based on current International Guidelines, it is recommended esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) every 5 years in BE without dysplasia with 1 up to 3 cm of extension; every 3 years in BE without dysplasia with >3 up to 10 cm of extension, every 6 to 12 months in BE with low grade dysplasia and, finally, EGD every 3 months after ablative endoscopic therapy in cases of BE with high grade dysplasia.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the colorectal cancer prevention.

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a policy of severe restrictions in almost all countries strongly involved by the pandemic. National Health System is among activities suffering from the COVID-19 and the lockdown.AimTo evaluate the impact of COVID-19 in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention.MethodsWe report the change in the hospital organization to meet the growing healthcare needs determined by COVID-19. The limitations of CRC prevention secondary to COVID-19 and their effects on the healthcare are analyzed considering the features of the CRC screening programs in the average-risk population and endoscopic surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).ResultsThe interruption of CRC prevention may lead to a delayed diagnosis of CRC, possibly in a more advanced stage. The economic burden and the impact on workload for gastroenterologists, surgeons, and oncologists will be greater as long as the CRC prevention remains suspended. To respond to the increased demand for colonoscopy once COVID-19 will be under control, we should optimize the resources. It will be necessary to stratify the CRC risk and reach an order of priority. It should be implemented the number of health workers, equipment, and spaces dedicated to performing colonoscopy for screening purpose and in subjects with alarm symptoms in the shortest time. To this aim, the funds earmarked for healthcare should be increased.ConclusionThe economic impact will be dramatic, but COVID-19 is the demonstration that healthcare has to be the primary goal of humans.

Digestive findings that do not require endoscopic surveillance - Reducing the burden of care: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

With the aim of reducing the overall burden of care, ESGE recommends against surveillance of a series of conditions. Namely: ESGE RECOMMENDS: against surveillance of individuals with the following: an inlet esophageal patch; Los Angeles (LA) grade A or B erosive esophagitis; or < 1 cm columnar-lined esophagus. ESGE RECOMMENDS: against surveillance of those with intestinal metaplasia limited to the antrum unless additional risk factors are present, such as persistent Helicobacter pylori infection, incomplete metaplasia, or a family history of gastric cancer; or for fundic gland polyps in the absence of suspicious endoscopic features or hereditary syndromes. ESGE RECOMMENDS: against surveillance of gastrointestinal leiomyomas, lipomas, and antral pancreatic rests, provided that these lesions have typical ultrasonographic features. ESGE RECOMMENDS: against routine endoscopic surveillance in duodenal peptic ulcer, unless symptoms persist despite adequate therapy. ESGE SUGGESTS: against surveillance of confirmed pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms. ESGE RECOMMENDS: against endoscopic surveillance for patients with hyperplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid, with 1 - 4 adenomas < 10 mm with low-grade dysplasia, or with a serrated polyp < 10 mm without dysplasia. ESGE RECOMMENDS: against surveillance of gastrointestinal conditions in individuals over 80 years old who have less than 10 years of life expectancy and poor general health status.

1476 Early Detection of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Recurrence With Colonoscopy

INTRODUCTION: Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL) are a group of malignancies that are derived from immature B cells, T cells and natural killer cells. The incidence of NHL is 19.6 per 100,000 per year in the United States. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a type of NHL which arises from mature B cells and has a more aggressive clinical course, accounting for 6% of all NHL cases. This amounts to approximately 4200 new cases in the US every year. MCL has a strong predilection for the gut with 92% of patients exhibiting gastrointestinal infiltration. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: Our patient is a 68-year-old Caucasian male referred for a routine screening colonoscopy. History was notable for MCL involving the hard palate diagnosed in February 2013. This was initially treated with R-CHOP therapy with subsequent Rituximab maintenance. Patient relapsed in February 2015. His relapse was treated with FCR therapy which was completed in June 2015. Follow up bone marrow biopsy was negative. In June 2016 he had recurrence of the malignancy on his hard palate, requiring treatment with local radiation. After completion of radiation, surveillance imaging with integrated whole body PET/CT demonstrated no further activity. He was deemed to be in remission and maintained routine biannual oncologic follow up for three years. Routine screening colonoscopy performed in May 2019, revealed a polyp in the transverse colon, and an additional polypoid lesion in the rectum. Biopsy revealed atypical lymphoid infiltrate consisting of medium sized lymphocytes that were positive for CD5, CD20, CD10, PAX5, Bcl-2, and cyclin D1. Morphology, immunofluorescence, and FISH were positive for t11:14, with pathology being consistent with mantle cell lymphoma. Patient has been referred back to his oncologist to discuss further treatment options. DISCUSSION: Our case illustrates the importance of endoscopic surveillance in patients with MCL. While PET/CT is invaluable in the surveillance of multiple malignancies, it maybe inadequate in determining remission and recurrence of MCL. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends that both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy be performed to assess treatment response and remission in this population. Given the high incidence of GI involvement in MCL, incorporating routine endoscopic surveillance as part of MCL management may be an important step for early detection of disease recurrence in this high-risk population.