Submucosal Endoscopic Resection Research Articles

Management of chronic exogenous rhinolith with gingivonasal fistula: a case report

Recurrent rhinorrhoea that occurs chronically, needs to consider the possibility of a fistula in the nasal cavity, which has the potential to form a rhinolith. We report the case of a 39-year-old man with complaints of recurrent rhinorrhoea since four years ago, accompanied by thick secretions, symptoms of post-nasal drips, and olfactory disturbances. The patient had a history of removing the left upper molar (molar I), which causes a fistula in the tooth extraction site, making it more likely for food and drink to enter the left nasal cavity. Anterior rhinoscopy examination revealed a white mass in the left inferior meatus and a purulent odour discharge. In addition, there were gingival defects of the first molar teeth, multi-sinusitis, and nasal septum deviation. Rinolith extraction was performed using functional endoscopic sinus surgery, submucosal resection, and repair of gingivo-nasal defects with rotational flaps. ---Continue

Identifying the Trends of Urinary microRNAs within Extracellular Vesicles for Esophageal Cancer.

Background: The advancement of multidisciplinary treatment has increased the need to develop tests to monitor tumor burden during treatment. We herein analyzed urinary microRNAs within extracellular vesicles from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and normal individuals using a microarray. Methods: Patients with advanced ESCC who underwent esophagectomy (A), endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) (B), and healthy donors (C) were included. Based on microRNA expression among the groups (Analysis 1), microRNAs with significant differences between groups A and C were selected (Analysis 2). Of these candidates, microRNAs in which the change between A and C was consistent with the change between B and C were selected for downstream analysis (Analysis 3). Finally, microRNA expression was validated in patients with recurrence from A (exploratory analysis). Results: For analysis 1, 205 microRNAs were selected. For Analyses 2 and 3, the changes in 18 microRNAs were consistent with changes in tumor burden as determined by clinical imaging and pathological findings. The AUC for the detection of ESCC using 18 microRNAs was 0.72. In exploratory analysis, three of eighteen microRNAs exhibited a concordant trend with recurrence. Conclusions: The current study identified the urinary microRNAs which were significantly expressed in ESCC patients. Validation study is warranted to evaluate whether these microRNAs could reflect tumor burden during multidisciplinary treatment for ESCC.

Multiple gastric neuroendocrine tumors in a patient with parietal cell dysfunction and adenosine triphosphatase H+/K+ transporting subunit alpha gene variant.

A 47-year-old woman presented with multiple gastric tumors, each up to 10mm in diameter, in the gastric body and fundus without mucosal atrophy. White spots and numerous transparent, light-brownish, small, and rounded spots were observed in the background gastric mucosa. Biopsy specimens obtained from the tumors revealed gastric neuroendocrine tumors. The patient exhibited hypergastrinemia and achlorhydria and tested negative for serum parietal cell antibody, intrinsic factor antibody, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Moreover, no additional lesions were detected on imaging. These findings were inconsistent with Rindi's classification. The tumor was resected via endoscopic submucosal resection. Histopathological examination revealed gastric neuroendocrine tumors G2 infiltrating the submucosa with no atrophy of the gastric mucosa, dilated fundic glands, parietal cell protrusions, and hyperplasia of enterochromaffin-like cells. Immunohistochemically, the parietal cells were negative for both α- and β-subunits of H+/K+ ATPase, suggesting parietal cell dysfunction. A genomic variant was identified in adenosine triphosphatase H+/K+ transporting subunit alpha. After 7years of treatment, there was no evidence of residual or metastatic lesions. Modification of adenosine triphosphatase H+/K+ transporting subunit alpha may be a significant factor in the pathogenesis of multiple gastric neuroendocrine tumors in the context of gastric parietal cell dysfunction.

How-I-do-it: laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) for gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction early lesions.

Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) is a novel approach to the resection of gastric lesion that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic approaches. The technique permits favourable access to lesions situated at the cardia and angular notch of the stomach, enables en-bloc resection of large areas of tissue, and can prevent the need of formal gastrectomy or oesophagectomy in selected patients. All cases were deemed suitable for LISD by a multidisciplinary team panel following endoscopic assessment (using white light enhancement, chromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy) that was integrated when needed with EUS, CT scan or PET scan. The surgical technique consisted in a 3-port laparoscopic approach; after establishment of pneumoperitoneum, three gastrotomies were performed to enable port insertion into the stomach. Following establishment of stable pneumogastrium, the area of interest was identified, submucosal hyaluronic acid injection performed to provide a cushion in the plane of dissection, and the excision area was circumferentially marked with cautery. Resection was completed using cautery hook, along a plane parallel to the muscolaris propria. After the specimen was extracted in a retrieval bag, intracorporeal single layer running suture closure of gastrotomies was performed. The abdominal wall closed by layers and tap block performed along with local anaesthetic injection on skin incision. Measures were taken to ensure correct orientation of resected specimens prior to fixation. During the study period that spans from 2014 and 2022, a total of 11 patients underwent LISD for limited lesions of the stomach, 10 were located at gastro-oesophageal junction and one at the angular incisura. Four patients were female, seven males. The median age was 74 (46-79) years. R0 resection rate was 54.5%. Mean operative time was 109min with very low blood loss (10ml). Mortality rate was 0%, no immediate major complications (Grade II-V Clavien Dindo), including haemorrhage or perforation, occurred in these cases. Two patients developed dysphagia later that was successfully treated with endoscopic balloon dilatations. Median hospital stay was 3days and median oral intake was on day 1 post-procedural. Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection is shown to be a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of early gastric cancers in selected patients having undergone deemed not amenable for endoscopic submucosal resection for their technically challenging location. Its application can serve as route to avoid formal surgery and the associated morbidity.

Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal neuroendocrine tumor: study protocol of a multicenter open-label randomized control trial (BANDIT trial)

BackgroundEndoscopic resection is widely accepted as a local treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors sized ≤ 10 mm. However, there is no consensus on the best method for the endoscopic resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) indicates a histologically complete resection rate comparable to that of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We hypothesized that ESMR-L than ESD would be preferred for rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Hence, this trial aimed to verify whether ESMR-L is non-inferior to ESD in terms of histologically complete resection rate.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial of two parallel groups, conducted at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and 31 other institutions in Japan. Patients with a lesion endoscopically diagnosed as a rectal neuroendocrine tumor ≤ 10 mm are eligible for inclusion. A total of 266 patients will be recruited and randomized to undergo either ESD or ESMR-L. The primary endpoint is the rate of en bloc resection with histologically tumor-free margins (R0 resection). Secondary endpoints include en bloc resection rate, procedure time, adverse events, hospitalization days, total devices and agents cost, adverse event rate between groups with and without resection site closure, outcomes between expert and non-expert endoscopists, and factors associated with R0 resection failure. The sample size is determined based on the assumption that the R0 resection rate will be 95.2% in the ESD group and 95.3% in the ESMR-L group, with a non-inferiority margin of 8%. With a one-sided significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 226 participants are required. Assuming a dropout rate of 15%, 266 patients will be included in this study.DiscussionThis is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing ESD and ESMR-L for the R0 resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 10 mm. This will provide valuable information for standardizing endoscopic resection methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.Trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs042210124. Registered on Jan 6, 2022.

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective C-NET STUDY.

The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased with colorectal cancer screening programs and increased colonoscopies. The management of colorectal NETs has recently shifted from radical surgery to endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various methods of endoscopic resection for colorectal NETs. Among those registered in the C-NET STUDY, patients with colorectal NETs who underwent endoscopic treatment as the initial therapy were included. Short-term outcomes, such as the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumor-free margin) rate, were analyzed based on treatment modalities. A total of 472 patients with 477 colorectal NETs received endoscopic treatment. Of these, 418 patients with 421 lesions who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 56.9% of them were men. The lower rectum was the most commonly affected site (88.6%), and lesions <10 mm accounted for 87% of the cases. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L, 56.5%) was the most common method, followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 31.4%) and endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C, 8.5%). R0 resection rates <10 mm were 95.5%, 94.8%, and 94.3% for ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C, respectively. All 16 (3.8%) patients who developed treatment-related complications could be treated conservatively. Overall, 23 (5.5%) patients had incomplete resection without independent clinicopathological risk factors. ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C were equally effective and safe for colorectal NETs with a diameter <10 mm.

Efficacy and safety of MC-003 solution for endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, triple-blinded, parallel-group, phase III study

Background and AimsThe safety and efficacy of solutions for submucosal injection are critical for endoscopic resection of gastric adenomas or early gastric cancers. Although several injectable solutions have been introduced for endoscopic resection, they have some limitations. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the new sodium alginate-based solution MC-003 with that of normal saline (NS, 0.9% sodium chloride). MethodsIn this randomized triple-blind study, 70 patients were initially enrolled for endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The main outcomes included the need for additional injections, completion of en bloc resection, and occurrence of adverse events. ResultsEach group finally comprised 34 patients. Complete en bloc resections were achieved in all patients (P = 1.000). The MC-003 group had more peri-neoplasm tissue fibrosis (P = 0.056) and needed fewer additional injections for lesions larger than 15 mm (P = 0.037), located in the distal part (P = 0.007) and during ESD procedures (P = 0.001), whereas the adverse event rate was comparable in both groups. ConclusionsMC-003 outperformed NS in reducing the need for additional injections during en bloc resection, particularly in larger lesions located in the distal part (where most lesions were found) during ESD procedures, without increasing the incidence of serious adverse events. MC-003 is a promising submucosal injectable solution in real-world clinical settings.

ESD with elastic ring traction is more effective and safer than conventional ESD in large proximal colon neoplastic lesions: a retrospective cohort study (with video)

Background and aimsColorectal endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD), especially ESD in proximal colon, has always been challenging. We invented a novel elastic ring as a traction method to facilitate ESD. Our study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of ESD with in vivo traction and conventional ESD without traction in the treatment of large proximal colon neoplastic lesions.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with large (≥ 20 mm in their maximal diameter) proximal colon neoplastic lesions who underwent ESD with in vivo elastic ring traction or conventional ESD without traction in our endoscopy center between June 2018 and April 2022 by one experienced endoscopist.ResultsThe ESD with traction group has lower overall complication rate and lower perforation rate than those in the conventional ESD group (0% vs 14.71%, P = 0.021; 0% vs 11.76%, P = 0.048, respectively), and the differences are statistically significant. Although there are no significant differences in the rates of en bloc resection and R0 resection and bleeding rate, ESD with traction group still had higher en bloc resection and R0 resection rates and lower bleeding rate than conventional ESD group without traction (100% vs 94.12%, P = 0.226; 94.59% vs 85.29%, P = 0.189, 8.82% vs 2.70%, P = 0.276, respectively).ConclusionESD with elastic ring traction is potentially more effective and safer than conventional ESD in the treatment of large proximal colon neoplastic lesions. Further large, prospective controlled studies are needed to fully evaluate this novel method.

Pattern of Residual Submucosal Involvement after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Rationale for the Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection.

Background and Objectives: Full-thickness trans anal local excision for tumors with favorable response following neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a common strategy for organ preservation, but it could be associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. We describe the incidence and pattern of submucosal involvement in surgical specimens following neoadjuvant therapy for LARC and whether limiting local excision of the residual tumor bed to only mucosal/submucosal layers of the rectal wall is sufficient for accurately predicting the ypT status of residual cancer, providing a pathological rationale to replace full-thickness local excision by endoscopic submucosal resection. Materials and Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective study conducted at a teaching community hospital. We reviewed clinical and pathological findings with slides of 82 patients diagnosed with LARC treated at our center between 2006 and 2020. Eligibility criteria mirrored our current organ preservation trials. Results: No tumor was found in surgical specimens in 28 cases (34%). Additionally, 4, 22, 27, and 1 cases were staged as ypT1, ypT2, ypT3, and ypT4, respectively. Residual malignant cells were found in the submucosal layer in 98% of cases with ypT+ stage, with 'skip lesions' in only 2% of cases. Conclusions: A very high incidence of submucosal involvement is noticed in residual tumors after neoadjuvant therapy, providing pathological rationale to study the role of endoscopic submucosal resection as a restaging tool for tumors with favorable response after neoadjuvant therapy when organ preservation strategy is pursued. This study was limited by its retrospective design and relatively small number of patients.

Effect of Sarcopenia on Pneumonia after Endoscopic Submucosal Resection in Patients Aged ≥65 Years: A Retrospective Study.

We aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and incidence of pneumonia after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients aged ≥65 years. Patients with (n = 1571) and without sarcopenia (n = 1718) who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasm were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the groups (n = 785) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the effect of sarcopenia on the incidence of pneumonia after ESD. Among the included patients, 2.2% (n = 71) developed pneumonia after ESD. After PSM, the incidence rate of pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia than that in patients without sarcopenia (p = 0.024). Sarcopenia and age ≥73 years were significantly associated with the incidence of pneumonia (sarcopenia and age <73 years, odd ratio (OR) = 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-3.22]; sarcopenia and age ≥73 years, OR = 3.92 [95% CI: 1.79-8.74]). Patients with sarcopenia had an increased risk of developing pneumonia after ESD, even after adjusting for other factors, resulting in a higher incidence of leukocytosis and a longer duration of post-ESD hospitalization. The combination of sarcopenia and age ≥73 years could be an effective predictive factor for screening high-risk groups for pneumonia after ESD.

Clinical Value of Clip-and-Snare Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Resection in Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Introduction: The aim of the study was to introduce a new endoscopic technology, clip-and-snare assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (CS-ESMR), for treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and then to investigate the therapeutic value of CS-ESMR. Methods: In this retrospective study, 67 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment of rectal NETs from March 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed. According to the endoscopic resection methods (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR], CS-ESMR, and endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]), the cases were divided into CS-ESMR group (27 cases), ESD group (31 cases), and EMR group (9 cases). The pathological R0 resection rate and the incidence of adverse events (bleeding and perforation) were compared among the three groups. Results: There was a significant difference about the pathological R0 resection between the CS-ESMR group and the EMR group and between the CS-ESMR group and the ESD group (both p < 0.05). Compared with ESD group, the procedure time, intraoperative bleeding, and the cost of CS-ESMR group are significantly decreased (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: CS-ESMR may be a safe and effective treatment for rectal NETs with a diameter of less than 10 mm, without muscularis propria invasion and metastasis.

Role of Advanced Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Comprehensive Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), also called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), are relatively uncommon, heterogenous tumors primarily originating in the gastrointestinal tract. With the improvement in technology and increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopy, they are being discovered with increasing frequency. Although traditionally considered indolent tumors with good prognoses, some NENs exhibit aggressive behavior. Timely diagnosis, risk stratification, and management can often be a challenge. In general, small NENs without local invasion or lymphovascular involvement can often be managed using minimally invasive advanced endoscopic techniques, while larger lesions and those with evidence of lymphovascular invasion require surgery, systemic therapy, or a combination thereof. Ideal management requires a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the stage and grade of the tumor. With the recent advancements, a therapeutic advanced endoscopist can play a pivotal role in diagnosing, staging, and managing this rare condition. High-definition white light imaging and digital image enhancing technologies like narrow band imaging (NBI) in the newer endoscopes have improved the diagnostic accuracy of traditional endoscopy. The refinement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) over the past decade has revolutionized the role of endoscopy in diagnosing and managing various pathologies, including NENs. In addition to EUS-directed diagnostic biopsies, it also offers the ability to precisely assess the depth of invasion and lymphovascular involvement and thus stage NENs accurately. EUS-directed locoregional ablative therapies are increasingly recognized as highly effective, minimally invasive treatment modalities for NENs, particularly pancreatic NENs. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques like endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) have been increasingly used over the past decade with excellent results in achieving curative resection of various early-stage gastrointestinal luminal lesions including NENs. In this article, we aim to delineate NENs of the different segments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (esophagus, gastric, pancreatic, and small and large intestine) and their management with emphasis on the endoscopic management of these tumors.

Salvage endoscopic submucosal resection for residual esophageal superficial cancer involving a stenotic anastomosis: a challenging but desirable indication.

Salvage endoscopic submucosal resection for residual esophageal superficial cancer involving a stenotic anastomosis: a challenging but desirable indication.

Treatment strategy and post-treatment management of colorectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Following the increase in colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there is a consequent increase in the importance of their appropriate treatment and post-treatment management. It is widely accepted that colorectal NETs sized ≥20mm and those with muscularis propria invasion are indicated for radical surgery, and those sized <10mm without the invasion are indicated for local resection. No consensus has been reached regarding the treatment strategy for those sized 10-19mm without the invasion. Endoscopic resection has become a primary option for the local resection of colorectal NETs. For rectal NETs sized <10mm, modified endoscopic mucosal resection, such as endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device and endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope, seems favorable because of its ability to achieve a high R0 resection rate, safety, and convenience. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can also be helpful for these lesions; however, this procedure may be more effective for large lesions or those in the colon. Management following local resection of colorectal NETs is based on the pathological evaluation of factors associated with metastasis, including tumor size, invasion depth, tumor cell proliferative activity (NET grading), presence of lymphovascular invasion, and resection margins. There remain unclear issues in managing cases with NET grading ≥2, positive lymphovascular invasion, and positive resection margins following local resection. In particular, there is confusion regarding managing positive lymphovascular invasion because positivity has become remarkably high with the increased use of the immunohistochemical/special staining. Further evidence based on long-term clinical outcomes is required to address these issues.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Smaller than 15mm.

Local resection, including endoscopic resection, is recommended for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) < 15mm in patients without risk factors for metastasis, though the short- and long-term outcomes are unclear. This study investigates the efficacy of endoscopic resection for rectal NETs < 15mm. The short- and long-term outcomes of patients with rectal NETs < 15mm who underwent endoscopic resection and the outcomes of each endoscopic technique were analyzed. The tumors were stratified as < 10mm (small-size group, SSG) and 10-14mm (intermediate-size group, IMG). Overall, 139 lesions (SSG, n = 118; IMG, n = 21) were analyzed. All tumors were classified as G1 (n = 135) or G2 (n = 4) according to the 2019 World Health Organization grading criteria. The complete resection rate was not different between the groups (P = 0.151). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) achieved complete resection rates > 90% in the SSG. The ESMR-L procedure time (P < 0.001) and hospitalized period (P < 0.001) were significantly shorter than those of ESD. ESD achieved a complete resection rate of 80.0% in the IMG. The tumor size did not affect the overall survival or rate of lymph node/distant metastases. Endoscopic resection is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with rectal NETs < 15mm without the risk factors of metastasis. ESMR-L and ESD are optimal techniques for resecting tumors smaller than 10mm and 10-14mm, respectively.

Clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis after endoscopic resection of 10-20mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter, retrospective study of 10-year experience.

The efficacy of endoscopic resection for of 10-20mm rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis after endoscopic resection of 10-20mm rectal NET and to determine the optimal treatment. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NET in four tertiary hospitals were enrolled, and data on with the clinical outcomes and risk factors related to poor prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 105 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD; n = 65, 61.9%), modified endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR; n = 31, 29.5%), and conventional EMR (cEMR; n = 9, 8.6%) were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 41.2 ± 21.9months. In the morphologic findings, the mean diameter was 11.6mm (range 10-19); the shape was sessile (50.5%) and mixed type (49.5%), and surface depression was observed in 41.9% of patients. In the histologic findings, 87.6% of patients had G1 and 12.4% G2 tumor grade, and 3.8% of patients had lymphovascular invasion. The overall en bloc and histologically complete (R0) resections were 99.1% and 76.2%, respectively. cEMR was a less-frequently developed R0 resection. In the univariate and multivariate analyses for R0 resection, only surface depression was significantly associated. Regional or distant organs metastasis during follow-up developed in three patients (2.9%) and was significantly associated with female sex, redness, G2 tumor grade, and non-ESD methods. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of 10-20mm rectal NET had good prognosis; therefore, endoscopic resection can be considered as the first-line treatment, particularly for 10-14mm rectal NET. However, the risk factors, such as female sex, redness, G2 tumor grade and non-ESD methods, were associated with regional or distant metastases during follow-up. Therefore, patients with these risk factors should be carefully monitored.

Endoscopic submucosal resection with adaptative traction device: a new strategy to facilitate resection in patient with inflammatory bowel disease.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is well described in non-IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) patients to remove non-invasive neoplastic lesions in the colon. Data are still limited in IBD patients. One of the limited factors for the resection by ESD of dysplasia in IBD is fibrosis, which leads to an increased risk of complication such as perforation.

Incidence and Pattern of Submucosal Involvement in Surgical Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Implications for Endoscopic Submucosal Resection

Incidence and Pattern of Submucosal Involvement in Surgical Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Implications for Endoscopic Submucosal Resection

Coexisting achalasia and leiomyoma misdiagnosed as the submucosal tumor, successfully treated by simultaneous peroral endoscopic myotomy and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in the same tunnel.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective method in the treatment of achalasia. Meanwhile, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is a common endoscopic method for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMT) in the upper digestive tract. However simultaneous POEM and STER for coexisting achalasia and esophageal SMT is rarely reported. A 40-year-old woman underwent esophagoscopy after dysphagia and vomiting for 20 years. The protruding submucosal lesion with normal overlying mucosa was found in the lower part of the esophagus, nearing cardia. Considering the persistent swallowing discomfort and vomiting symptoms, the patient underwent esophageal manometry and barium esophagram, and was finally diagnosed as achalasia with esophageal submucosal tumor. Finally, POEM and STER were performed simultaneously on the patient in the same tunnel. The patient was followed up for 4 months without recurrence or complaints. We herein report a case of achalasia with esophageal leiomyoma who underwent POEM and STER in the same tunnel to remove the mass and relieve the symptoms.

Multiple ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection combined with endoscopic ultrasonography: a novel method to treat rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

The first choice of treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (R-NETs) 10 mm in size is endoscopic resection, there is still controversy concerning the optimal endoscopic treatment for resecting R-NETs. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of multiple ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection combined with endoscopic ultrasonography (EMR-MLUS) for R-NETs. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 62 patients with R-NETs ≤10 mm in size who underwent EMR-MLUS or ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection combined with endoscopic ultrasonography (EMR-LUS) between May 2019 and April 2022, including tumor characteristics, endoscopic complete resection, pathological complete resection, the procedure time, adverse events, and follow-up were compared between the two groups of patients. Of the 62 patients, 19 underwent EMR-MLUS and 43 underwent EMR-LUS. The endoscopic morphology of lesions was statistically different between group EMR-MLUS and group EMR-LUS ( P = 0.015), and most of them were flat and slightly raised lesions in group EMR-MLUS. Although the pathological complete resection rate was slightly higher in the EMR-MLUS group than in the EMR-LUS group (94.74% vs. 90.70%; P = 0.290), the endoscopic complete resection rate was high in both groups. Involvement of the lateral resection margin was found four cases in the ESMR-LUS group; one case of deep resection margin involvement in the EMR-MLUS group. The mean procedure time was longer in the EMR-MLUS group than in the EMR-LUS group (12.79 ± 1.01 min vs. 11.08 ± 1.89 min; P = 0.041). In group EMR-LUS, there were two cases of immediate bleeding; in group EMR-MLUS, one case of perforation, all of them were successfully treated by endoscopy. No recurrence, progression, or metastasis was found in all patients. EMR-MLUS is a safe and effective technique that could be considered when removing small rectal NETs, especially flat and slightly raised lesions.