Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Surgery Research Articles

Impact of the Lumbar Catheter on the Incidence of Postsurgical Meningitis in the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Abstract Objectives Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) procedures are inherently contaminated due to direct access through the nasopharyngeal mucosa. The reported rate of postoperative meningitis in EEA procedures is between 0.7 and 10%. Lumbar catheters are used in EEA surgeries to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulae, but their use is associated with increased infection rates. This study investigated whether there is a difference in rates of postoperative meningitis based on lumbar catheter (LC) utilization. Methods We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent EEA surgeries between January 2016 and March 2023 at a single institution (Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia). Main Outcome Incidence of meningitis following EEA surgery with lumbar catheter. Results Seventy-two patients were enrolled, median age was 44 years, and 53% were female. The most frequent surgery performed was craniopharyngioma 46% (26 patients). A LC was used in 28 patients. Meningitis was diagnosed in 11 of 72 patients (15.2%), being higher in the LC group (10 patients). The odds ratio for the development of meningitis in the presence of an LC was 23.38 (95% confidence interval, 2.77–123.78; p < 0.004). There was no statistical difference in the reported incidence of meningitis when CSF leak was present. Conclusions This study demonstrates an extremely high incidence of meningitis (36%) following EEA procedures when an LC is used. The incidence of meningitis was not significantly associated with CSF leak in our cohort.

The Learning Curve for Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: Evaluating Endocrine Outcomes

ObjectiveIn South Australia endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) pituitary surgery has been practiced since 2006, largely by two neurosurgeons with a small fellowship-trained otolaryngology team. The aim of this cohort study was to determine if a “learning curve” can be established over this time period, as represented by structural and endocrine patient outcomes. MethodRetrospective cohort study of patients undergoing EEA surgery between 2006 and 2021 in Adelaide, South Australia at three tertiary teaching hospitals.. Cases were divided by each surgeon and split into groups of sequential 40 cases. Endocrine assessment pre- and post-operatively involved static pituitary and end-organ hormones, with dynamic tests as required, assessed by an pituitary endocrinologist. Each hormonal axis (gonadal, cortisol, thyroid, prolactin and growth hormone) was documented preoperatively and at an early and long term follow up at 1–2 and 12 months, respectively. ResultsThe study included a cohort of 443 pituitary adenomas managed with endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in a consecutive fashion between two neurosurgeons over 16-years. Gross tumour resection but not visual visual outcomes improved with surgical experience but this outcome may be neurosurgeon dependent. Endocrine outcomes were not consistently improved with experience, but lower rates of hypopituitarism were seen with experience with one neurosurgeon. Average follow up was approximately 5 years, and a minimum follow up of 12 months for all patients. ConclusionsWe present long term endocrine follow up for patients with functional and non-functional adenomas. Improved rates of gross tumour resection were evident with with surgical experience. However, there was no apparent change in post-operative endocrine outcomes.

Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningioma: Transcranial approach or endoscopic endonasal approach?

BackgroundTuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM), a common benign tumor in the sellae region, usually causes neurological deficits, such as vision impairment, by squeezing the peripheral neurovascular structures. Surgical management is recommended as the optimal strategy for TSM treatment and vision restoration. However, it remains challenging to resect TSM in the traditional transcranial approach (TCA). Recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has emerged as an effective option in skull base surgeries. Besides the effectivity, the advantages and limitations of EEA in TSM surgery remain controversial.ObjectWe compared the surgical outcomes and complications between TCA and EEA surgeries to identify the principles in TSM surgical management.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on the patients, who underwent TSM surgery in Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were assigned to TCA or EEA group according to the surgery they experienced. All patients were analyzed with the extent of tumor resection, vision outcome, postoperative complications, and follow-up results.ResultsA total of 112 patients were enrolled in this study, including 78 in TCA group and 34 in EEA group. The mean follow-up was 20.5 months (range 3–36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographic data, preoperative symptoms, and tumor characteristics between TCA and EEA groups. Both TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection with relatively high gross total resection rates (85.9% in TCA vs. 91.2% in EEA, p > .05). Meanwhile, EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery (74.6% in TCA vs. 93.1% in EEA, p < .05). Whereas EEA surgery causes more occurrences of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage than TCA surgery (0% in TCA vs. 11.8% in EEA, p < .05).ConclusionBoth TCA and EEA surgeries are effective in TSM resection. EEA surgery has a better outcome in vision restoration or stabilization than TCA surgery, but induces higher risk of CSF leakage. As each approach has unique advantages and limitations, we must take all aspects into consideration, including approach feathers, tumor characteristics, and clinical requirements, to make the optimal choice in TSM surgical management.

Comparing Rates of Postoperative Meningitis After Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures Based on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) procedures are inherently contaminated due to direct access through the nasopharyngeal mucosa. The reported rate of postoperative meningitis in EEA procedures is 0.7%-3%. A variety of methods exist to minimize the risk of meningitis with antibiotic prophylaxis, although their value is not completely understood. This study investigated whether there is a difference in rates of postoperative meningitis based on Staphylococcus aureus colonization and use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. All adult patients who underwent EEA resection at our institution from 2013 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with preoperative cerebrospinal fluid infections were excluded. Data including recent preoperative infections, preoperative colonization status, antibiotic administration, and postoperative outcomes were recorded for each patient. Of 483 patients identified (mean age, 51 years; range, 18-90 years; 274 [56.7%] female), 80 (16.6%) had a positive preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) screening swab. Twenty-one (26.3%) colonized patients were treated with preoperative decolonizing antibiotics. Within 30 days of surgery, 13 (2.7%) patients developed culture-positive meningitis. There was no significant difference in meningitis rates based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status. Among colonized patients, there was no significant difference in rates of MRSA/MSSA meningitis based on preoperative antibiotic decolonization. Postoperative rates of meningitis after EEA surgery were not significantly changed based on MRSA/MSSA colonization status of the patient or preoperative decolonization. The utility of preoperative testing of MRSA/MSSA status and antibiotics for decolonization to prevent postoperative meningitis should be further investigated.

Application of dural suturing in the endoscopic endonasal approach to the sellar region.

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is widely used in the treatment of cranial base tumors. Skull base reconstruction is a crucial part of EEA, which has a great impact on patients' prognosis. In this study, we report our experience with sellar dural suturing in cranial base reconstruction and retrospectively analyze its effect. The clinical data of 134 patients who suffered intraoperative CSF leakage and underwent EEA surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from October 2018 to November 2020 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. According to whether sellar dural suturing was performed during the operation, they were divided into a suture group (55 cases) and a control group (79 cases). The results showed that dural suturing of the sellar floor effectively reduced the postoperative hospitalization duration (p = 0.026) and the use rates of lumbar drainage (p = 0.047), autologous fat transplantation (p = 0.038), and pedicled nasoseptal flaps (p = 0.026). Sellar dural suturing under endoscopy is a promising and effective method for cranial base reconstruction in EEA surgery and is worthy of clinical application.

Impact of endoscopic endonasal approach on quality of life in patients with anterior skull base intra-extracranial extension meningioma

Objective: To summarize the experience of endoscopic endonasal approach in the treatment of anterior skull base with intra-extracranial extension meningioma, and to analyze the perioperative quality of life of patients, and to discuss the safety and efficacy of the treatment. Methods: A total of 83 cases of anterior skull base with intra-extracranial extension meningioma admitted to Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from October 2007 to October 2019, who underwent endoscopic endonasal approach tumor resection, were retrospectively analyzed. The quality of life of the patients were evaluated by Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire (ASBQ) before and after surgery. The surgical techniques, extent of tumor resection, postoperative complications and the changes of patients' quality of life were summarized and analyzed. SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 57 anterior skull base with intra-extracranial extension meningioma patients were enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 23 males and 34 females, aging (48.6±16.6) years. Fifty cases (87.7%) reached or exceeded Simpson gradeⅠ resection, and 7 cases underwent subtotal resection. Symptoms relief was as follows: headache relief in 45/50 (90%), vision improvement in 18/19 (94.7%), olfaction improvement in 6/45 (13.3%), mental symptoms improvement in 3/9 (33.3%), and seizure relief in 5/7 (71.4%). Postoperative complication included mental symptoms in 5 cases, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 cases, epilepsy in 2 cases, frontal lobe hemorrhage in 1 case, and intracranial infection in 1 case. The follow-up period was 38 to 144 months. There were two cases recurring and no death. ASBQ assessment showed significant improvement in general condition, physical function, role function, mood disorder, pain, vision impairment, and sleep disturbance at 1 month postoperatively, with continued improvement thereafter, and reached stable at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Endoscopic endonasal approach surgery is able to achieve safe and effective tumor resection for anterior skull base intra-extracranial extension meningioma, and the quality of life of patients can be improved steadily.

Complications after 1002 endoscopic endonasal approach procedures at a single center: lessons learned, 2010-2018.

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has evolved into a mainstay of skull base surgery over the last two decades, but publications examining the intraoperative and perioperative complications of this technique remain scarce. A prior landmark series of 800 patients reported complications during the first era of EEA (1998-2007), parallel to the development of many now-routine techniques and technologies. The authors examined a single-institution series of more than 1000 consecutive EEA neurosurgical procedures performed since 2010, to elucidate the safety and risk factors associated with surgical and postoperative complications in this modern era. After obtaining institutional review board approval, the authors retrospectively reviewed intraoperative and postoperative complications and their outcomes in patients who underwent EEA between July 2010 and June 2018 at a single institution. The authors identified 1002 EEA operations that met the inclusion criteria. Pituitary adenoma was the most common pathology (n = 392 [39%]), followed by meningioma (n = 109 [11%]). No patients died intraoperatively. Two (0.2%) patients had an intraoperative carotid artery injury: 1 had no neurological sequelae, and 1 had permanent hemiplegia. Sixty-one (6.1%) cases of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred, of which 45 occurred during the original surgical hospitalization. Transient postoperative sodium dysregulation was noted after 87 (8.7%) operations. Six (0.6%) patients were treated for meningitis, and 1 (0.1%) patient died of a fungal skull base infection. Three (0.3%) patients died of medical complications, thereby yielding a perioperative 90-day mortality rate of 0.4% (4 deaths). High-grade (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) complications were identified after 103 (10%) EEA procedures, and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the associations between factors and these more serious complications. Extradural EEA was significantly associated with decreased rates of these high-grade complications (OR [95% CI] 0.323 [0.153-0.698], p = 0.0039), whereas meningioma pathology (OR [95% CI] 2.39 [1.30-4.40], p = 0.0053), expanded-approach intradural surgery (OR [95% CI] 2.54 [1.46-4.42], p = 0.0009), and chordoma pathology (OR [95% CI] 9.31 [3.87-22.4], p < 0.0001) were independently associated with significantly increased rates of high-grade complications. The authors have reported a large 1002-operation cohort of EEA procedures and associated complications. Modern EEA surgery for skull base pathologies has an acceptable safety profile with low morbidity and mortality rates. Nevertheless, significant intraoperative and postoperative complications were correlated with complex intradural procedures and meningioma and chordoma pathologies.

Comparison Between Conventional Flash and Off-Response Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery.

Intraoperative flash stimulation visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring has been used for endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Recently, off-response VEP, which is recorded when the light stimulus is turned off, was introduced to monitor visual function intraoperatively. To evaluate off-response VEP monitoring in comparison with the conventional flash stimulation VEP monitoring for EEA. From March 2015 to March 2020, 70 EEA surgeries with intraoperative VEP monitoring (140 eyes) were performed. Light stimuli were delivered by a pair of goggle electrodes. Recording electrodes were placed on the scalp over the occipital region. The warning signal was prompted by a reduction of the peak-to-peak amplitude of the VEP by more than 50% compared to the initial amplitude. Visual function was assessed pre- and postoperatively. Results of flash and off-response VEP monitoring were compared. VEP was recorded in 134 eyes. Warning signal occurred in 23 eyes (transient in 17 eyes and permanent in 6 eyes). Two eyes showed permanent VEP attenuation for flash VEP monitoring, in which one patient had postoperative visual function deterioration. Four eyes showed permanent VEP attenuation for off-response VEP monitoring, where 2 patients had postoperative visual function deterioration. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 98.9%, 50%, and 100%, respectively, for flash stimulation VEP, and 100%, 97.8%, 50%, and 100%, respectively, for off-response VEP. VEP monitoring was useful to monitor visual function in EEA surgery. Off-response VEP monitoring was not inferior to conventional flash stimulation VEP monitoring.

Impact of Pituitary Stalk Preservation on Tumor Recurrence/Progression and Surgically Induced Endocrinopathy After Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Suprasellar Craniopharyngiomas.

Objective: To investigate the factors associated with recurrence/progression after endoscopic endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. Special attention was paid to assess the impact of pituitary stalk preservation on tumor recurrence/progression and endocrinological outcomes.Methods: We retrospectively recruited 73 patients with suprasellar craniopharyngiomas undergone endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) surgery from September 2014 to May 2019 and assessed their clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and recurrence/progression. Stalk preservation or sacrifice was determined by reviewing operative records, videos, and post-operative magnetic resonance imaging.Results: Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 51 cases (69.9%). Tumor recurrence was seen in 5 cases (9.8%) and progression was seen in 8 cases (36.4%), respectively. GTR (OR = 0.248 CI 0.081–0.759; p = 0.015) was the only independent factor influencing recurrence/progression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the mean recurrence/progression-free survival were 53 (95% CI 48–59) and 39 (95% CI 28–50) months, respectively, in patients with and without GTR (p = 0.011). Pituitary stalk preservation was more common in cases with peripheral type tumors (83% vs. 30%, p < 0.01). Preserving the pituitary stalk does not appear to decrease the percentage of GTR (75.5% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.089), or increase the rate of tumor recurrence (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.508) or progression (46.2% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.486). However, surgically induced hypothyroidism (60.5% vs. 100%, p = 0.041) and diabetes insipidus (35.1% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.017) were significantly lower in patients with stalk preservation. For patients who had hypopituitarism before EEA, there was no difference between those with and without stalk preservation regarding post-operative hypopituitarism (p > 0.05).Conclusion: GTR is the only independent predictor of recurrence/progression after EEA surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas. Preserving the pituitary stalk does not appear to increase the risk of non-GTR and tumor recurrence/progression and might help reduce the risk of surgically induced hypothyroidism and diabetes insipidus. We recommend preserving the pituitary stalk in peripheral type suprasellar craniopharyngiomas with normal pituitary function, especially in cases without hypothyroidism or diabetes insipidus. On the other hand, stalk sacrifice could be considered in central type tumors with severe pre-operative endocrinopathy.

Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Clinically Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas

Background: Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are the most frequent pituitary macroadenomas, and represent approximately one-third of all pituitary adenomas. Patients often present with symptoms of mass effects, such as visual field defects, chronic headache, and hypopituitarism. Objective: The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the surgical results of 35 patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) operated by the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). Surgical outcomes including postoperative complications, recurrence and the postoperative visual and endocrine profile were assessed. Results: This retrospective study included 35 patients operated for clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) in Al Azhar university hospitals treated by endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the last 6 years. 65.7% (n = 23) were male and 34.3% (n = 12) were female. The mean age was 41.5 (range 18 - 65) years. The most common presenting symptoms were headache, with 60% of the patients having headache. Visual disturbances were the presenting symptom in 82.9% patients and endocrinological problems (panhypopituitarism) were present in 6 (17.1%) patients. The number of patients suffering from cranial nerve deficit was 2 (5.7%). Visual acuity and visual field improved in 23 (79.3%) of 29 patients. The rate of tumor recurrence/regrowth was higher in the case of giant adenomas and cavernous sinus invasion represented 11 patients (31.4%). Conclusions: Early endoscopic endonasal approach surgery of NFPAs and effective surgical decompression reduces morbidity. Visual deficit improves in two third of cases. NFPAs represent high rate of recurrence due to invasion or incomplete resection especially with giant adenomas. The recurrence rate with growth total resection (GTR) is lower than subtotal resection (STR).

Ambulatory Surgery Protocol for Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Single-arm Trial with Initial Implementation Experience

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection has been accepted as a routine therapy for pituitary adenoma, but the postoperative hospital stay is typically several days long. With the advantages of reduced cost and improved patient satisfaction, the application of ambulatory surgery (AS) has developed rapidly. However, AS was still rarely adopted in neurosurgery. Here we designed an AS treatment protocol for pituitary adenoma with the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), and reported our initial experiences regarding the safety and efficacy of the AS protocol. 63 patients who presented with pituitary adenoma were screened at the Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital from July to September, 2017. A total of 20 pituitary adenoma patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent EEA surgery using this evidence-based AS protocol, which emphasized adequate assessment for eligibility, full preparation to minimize invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and active perioperative patient education. Of the 20 patients enrolled, 18 were discharged on the afternoon of the operation day with a median total length of stay (LOS) of 31 hours (range, 29–32) hours. The median LOS after surgery was 6.5 (range, 5–8) hours. Two patients were transferred from the AS protocol to conventional care due to intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (one case) and an unsatisfying post-anesthetic discharge score (one case). Complications included transient and reversible mild postoperative nausea and vomiting [visual analog scale (VAS) score <3], headache (VAS score <3) after the operation or early after discharge. No patient was readmitted. Our results supported the safety and efficacy of the AS protocol for pituitary adenoma patients undergoing EEA resection among eligible patients, and further evaluation of this protocol in controlled studies with a larger sample size is warranted.

Clinical study of endoscopic treatment of a sellar pituitary adenomas with sellar diaphragm defect

BackgroundInvasive growth of pituitary macroadenomas to the suprasellar region occurs commonly. Pituitary adenomas show varying growth patterns when the sellar diaphragm is absent, and they are often confused with other common tumors in the sellar region. This article explores the clinical features of suprasellar pituitary adenomas with defects of the sellar diaphragm (SPADSD) and evaluates the efficacy of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for treatment of such tumors.MethodsWe performed a detailed examination of records from 19 patients collected prior to surgery. After relevant diseases were excluded, the tumor properties were evaluated according to imaging characteristics. Diagnoses were verified using EEA surgery. The concept of SPADSD was put forward. Postoperative recovery was followed to determine whether EEA is suitable for the treatment of such tumors.ResultsIn the 19 patients with SPADSD, we found that the tumors were less stressed on the pituitary, and tumors in the suprasellar region often had irregular shapes. During surgery, we took extended supra-saddle approaches and confirmed that unrestricted growth of the tumor was caused by defects in the diaphragm of the sella turcica to the suprasellar region. Recovery was good after surgery, confirming the efficacy of EEA for treatment of these tumors.ConclusionSPADSD has different clinical features from those of other pituitary tumors and requires careful screening prior to surgery. Endoscopic surgery is the preferred procedure for this type of tumor.

Outcomes and quality of life evaluation following endoscopic endonasal approach for sinonasal malignancies

Objective: To analyse the outcomes and the prognostic factors of patients with sinonasal malignancies following endoscopic endonasal approach, and to compare the pre- and post-operative quality of life. Methods: A retrospective single-center review of 79 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approach for sinonasal malignancies in Beijing Tongren Hospital from October 2004 to March 2017 was performed, including 51 males and 28 females, with a median age of 48 years. Data of demography, imaging (including nasal CT and MRI before operation), histopathology and treatment strategy were collected. Recurrence and distant metastasis were diagnosed according to endoscopic examination, MRI and general check-up after surgery. Pre- and post-operative quality of life scores were obtained by sinonasal outcome test-22, visual analog scale and anterior skull base surgery questionnaire. SPSS 22 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The study consisted of 13 pathological types with sinonasal T1-T4 stage tumors, including cervical lymph nodes and/or distant metastasis. All patients underwent endoscopic endonasal approach surgery. After 43 months of median follow-up time, the overall, disease-free, and recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 97.4%, 92.5%, 92.5% and 83.7%; 83.2%, 68.3%, 56.8% and 33.6%; 84.5%, 66.6%, 58.0% and 34.4%, respectively. Postoperative recurrence was an independent risk factor affecting the overall survival rate (HR=8.852, P=0.044), and preoperative recurrence (secondary surgery) was an independent risk factor affecting the disease-free and recurrence-free survival rate (HR value was 2.237 and 2.095 respectively, P value was 0.029 and 0.047 respectively). After surgery, the olfaction and nasal scab got worse, while the nasal obstruction and breathing were improved. Conclusions: Endoscopic endonasal approach for sinonasal malignancies can achieve satisfactory outcomes, and has obvious advantages in improving the quality of life. Postoperative recurrence and preoperative recurrence are the prognostic factors.

An Algorithm for Sellar Reconstruction Following the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach: A Review of 300 Consecutive Cases

Objectives/Hypotheses The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is the workhorse endoscopic procedure for sellar and parasellar pathology. Various reconstruction techniques have been reported following EEA surgery, ranging from no reconstruction to vascularized flaps. We review our institution's experience with sellar reconstruction following EEA and propose an evidence-based algorithm. Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Participants Patients who underwent endoscopic EEA surgery for sellar or parasellar pathology between March 1, 2013 and August 31, 2016. Main Outcome Measures Patient demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected. Outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates and extent of resection (gross or subtotal). Results Three hundred consecutive patients were included. Depending on the presence and grade of intraoperative CSF leak, cases were reconstructed using either a free mucosal graft (FMG) or nasoseptal flap (NSF). Intraoperative and postoperative CSF leak rates were 30.7% and 2.3%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression found that intraoperative CSF leak was associated with recurrent disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.47, p = 0.004), with no apparent predictors of postoperative CSF leak. Conclusions Based on this large series, we propose the following algorithm for sellar reconstruction: FMG for no CSF leak; fat graft + FMG ± rigid fixation for low-grade leaks; and fat graft + NSF ± rigid fixation for high-grade leaks.

Direct Repair of Iatrogenic Internal Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Approach Surgery With Temporary Endovascular Balloon-Assisted Occlusion: Technical Case Report.

Iatrogenic internal carotid artery (ICA) injuries during endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) surgeries are associated with a high morbidity and mortality, with few acceptable methods described for repair. A 13-year-old girl with a large anterior and central skull base osteoblastoma incurred an iatrogenic cavernous ICA injury during a staged EEA approach. Intraoperative angiogram was performed with balloon-assisted EEA primary microsurgical repair of the lacerated ICA. By integrating current techniques commonly used in open aneurysm surgeries and in endovascular procedures, we developed a rapid, safe technique to repair an EEA-associated iatrogenic ICA injury.