Endoscopic Biliary Drainage Research Articles

A retrospective comparative study of biliary drainage using balloon endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound for malignant obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in patients with surgically altered anatomy is challenging, and technical difficulty could differ by the anatomy. Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (BE-ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) are both emerging procedures, and we conducted the single-center, retrospective study to compare clinical outcomes of BE-ERCP and EUS-BD for MBO. Consecutive patients with surgically altered anatomy who underwent BE-ERCP or EUS-BD for MBO were retrospectively studies. Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events (AEs), and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared. Patient characteristics were comparable between BE-ERCP (n = 118) and EUS-BD (n = 32), other than more patients with hepaticojejunostomy in the BE-ERCP group (66% vs. 44%, P = 0.03). Technical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS-BD group (70% vs. 94%, P = 0.005), but clinical success rates (84% vs. 90%, P = 0.55), early AE (14% vs. 22%, P = 0.29) and late AE rates (42% vs. 38%, P = 0.84), and RBO rates (31% vs. 34%, P = 0.67) were comparable between the groups. TRBO was 170 and 206days in the BE-ERCP and EUS-BD group (P = 0.37). In the subgroup analysis of patients with the intact papilla, the technical success rate of BE-ERCP was as low as 55%, compared to 94% in EUS-BD (P = 0.003). EUS-BD was associated with higher technical success rate than BE-ERCP for MBO in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Endoscopic biliary drainage using a narrow-diameter endoscope in a patient with obstructive jaundice and pancreatic cancer.

Endoscopic biliary drainage using a narrow-diameter endoscope in a patient with obstructive jaundice and pancreatic cancer.

Feasibility of Double-Deployment Small-Diameter Covered Metallic Stent for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction (with Video)

Background/Objectives: Covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) are commonly used to treat malignant distal biliary obstructions. A 10-mm CSEMS carries the risk of obstructing the pancreatic and cystic duct orifices by adhering to the bile duct; therefore, postoperative pancreatitis and cholecystitis are reported to occur at a certain frequency. We have adopted a new drainage technique for malignant distal biliary obstruction called ‘‘double-slim SEMS stenting” (DSS), where two small-diameter CSEMS are placed side-by-side. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage using DSS with those of conventional CSEMS. Methods: In total, 50 patients who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstructions between April 2019 and March 2022 at Hyogo Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into DSS and Conventional groups, and the technical success rate, clinical success rate, adverse events, success rate for reintervention, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate, and time to RBO (TRBO) were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the DSS (n = 20) and Conventional groups (n = 30). The technical and clinical success rates were 100% in the DSS group. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (DSS/Conventional: 10.0% [2/20]/20.0% [6/30]) (p = 0.34). No acute cholecystitis was observed in the DSS group. The incidence rates of RBO were 30% (6/20) and 43% (13/30) in the DSS and Conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.92). The median TRBO in the DSS group was 378 days, while the TRBO in the Conventional group was 195 days (p = 0.03), resulting in significantly longer TRBO in the DSS group. Conclusions: DSS emerges as a viable and safe approach for biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction, demonstrating a lower incidence of adverse events and longer TRBO compared to conventional CSEMS.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using a novel visibility enhancement mode of a fluoroscopic system.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using a novel visibility enhancement mode of a fluoroscopic system.

Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in patients experiencing obstructive jaundice due to unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Objective: To assess the treatment outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) in patients with obstructive jaundice due to unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: The clinical data of patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent EUS-BD due to ERCP failure at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Beijing Friendship Hospital from September 2018 to November 2023, was retrospectively collected and analyzed. We explored the technical success, clinical success, and adverse events associated with EUS-BD. Results: In total, 43 EUS-BD procedures were performed in 39 patients with a technical success rate of 86.0% (37/43). The clinical success rate was 81.1% (30/37). Biliary drainage was not effectively achieved in seven cases, including two fatal cases and five cases of recurrent postoperative biliary obstruction. The incidence of adverse events was 21.6% (8/37), including two cases of postoperative bile leakage peritonitis, two cases of stent displacement, one case of stent dislocation, one case of perforation, and two cases of death. Conclusion: EUS-BD is a relatively safe and effective method for bile duct drainage, serving as a dependable alternative therapeutic option for patients with obstructive jaundice due to unsuccessful ERCP.

S1612 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis Secondary to Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S1612 Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage for Acute Cholangitis Secondary to Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic biliary drainage for distal bile duct obstruction due to pancreatic cancer.

Approximately 60% of pancreatic cancers occur in the pancreatic head and may present as obstructive jaundice due to bile duct invasion. Obstructive jaundice often leads to poor general conditions and acute cholangitis, interfering with surgery and chemotherapy and requiring biliary drainage. The first choice of treatment for biliary drainage is the endoscopic transpapillary approach. In unresectable tumors, self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are most commonly used and are classified into uncovered and covered SEMSs. Recently, antireflux metal stents and large- or small-diameter SEMSs have become commercially available, and their usefulness has been reported. Plastic stents are infrequently used in patients with resectable biliary obstruction; however, owing to the recent trend in preoperative chemotherapy, SEMSs are frequently used because of the long time to recurrent biliary obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is often performed in patients who are not eligible for the transpapillary approach, and favorable outcomes have been reported. Different EUS-BD techniques and specialized stents have been developed and can be safely used in high-volume centers. The indications for EUS-BD are expected to further expand in the future.

Comparative Effectiveness of ERCP and EUS-Guided Techniques for "Primary Biliary Drainage" in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a viable alternative in cases with failed ERCP transpapillary drainage (ERCP-TPD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD and ERCP-TPD for primary biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). We searched Embase, PubMed, and Medline databases for studies comparing EUS-BD and ERCP-TPD in DMBO, from inception until September 2023. The primary endpoint was clinical success and secondary endpoints included technical success, procedure duration, and adverse events. Eight studies (815 patients, 56.1% male) were included in this analysis. Indications for biliary drainage were pancreatic carcinoma (75.1%), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (10.1%). Clinical success was comparable between EUS-BD and ERCP-TPD groups (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.40; P=0.32). Technical success was similar between the 2 groups (OR 2.09; 95% CI, 0.83-5.25; P=0.12). There was a trend toward fewer adverse events in the EUS-BD group (OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.40-1.07; P=0.09), with significantly lower odds of post-procedure pancreatitis (OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.50; P=0.001). EUS-BD is comparable to ERCP for primary biliary drainage in DMBO patients with shorter procedural time and a significantly reduced risk of post-procedure pancreatitis.

Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis induced after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary strictures: a retrospective study in Japan.

Endoscopic biliary drainage using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant biliary strictures occasionally induces acute cholecystitis (AC). This study evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic gallbladder stents (GBS) during SEMS placement. Among 158 patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures between January 2018 and March 2023, 30 patients who attempted to undergo prophylactic GBS placement before SEMS placement were included. Technical success was achieved in 21 cases (70.0%). The mean diameter of the cystic duct was more significant in the successful cases (6.5 mm vs. 3.7 mm, p<0.05). Adverse events occurred for 7 patients (23.3%: acute pancreatitis in 7; non-obstructive cholangitis in 1; perforation of the cystic duct in 1 with an overlap), all of which improved with conservative treatment. No patients developed AC when the GBS placement was successful, whereas 25 of the 128 patients (19.5%) without a prophylactic GBS developed AC during the median follow-up period of 357 days (p=0.043). In the multivariable analysis, GBS placement was a significant factor in preventing AC (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.99; p=0.045). GBS may contribute to the prevention of AC after SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for distal malignant biliary obstruction due to pancreatic cancer with asymptomatic duodenal invasion: a retrospective, single-center study in Japan.

Duodenal invasion (DI) is a risk factor for early recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) may reduce early RBO in cases of asymptomatic DI, even when ERCP is possible. We enrolled 56 patients with pancreatic cancer and asymptomatic DI who underwent EUS-HGS (n=25) or ERCP-BD (n=31). Technical and clinical success, early (<3 months) and overall RBO rates, time to RBO (TRBO), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the EUS-HGS and ERCP-BD groups. Risk factors for early RBO were also evaluated. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Both procedures demonstrated 100% technical and clinical success rates, with a similar incidence of AE (48% vs. 39%, p=0.59). While the median TRBO was comparable (5.7 vs. 8.8 months, p=0.60), EUS-HGS was associated with a lower incidence of early RBO compared to ERCP-BD (8% vs. 29%, p=0.09). The major causes of early RBO in ERCP-BD were sludge and food impaction, rarely occurring in EUS-HGS. EUS-HGS was potentially reduced early RBO (odds ratio, 0.32; p=0.07). EUS-HGS can be a viable option for treating pancreatic cancer with asymptomatic DI.

Digital cholangioscope assisted radiation-free bedside one-stage endoscopic lithotomy and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis

Radiation-free one-stage bedside endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis (SAC) caused by choledocholithiasis in intensive care unit (ICU) has not been reported. Herein, we introduce our preliminary experience of such intervention. Radiation-free bedside digital cholangioscope-assisted one-stage endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage was performed in an urgent manner. Data on clinical outcomes and follow-up from thirty patients were retrospectively analyzed. Time interval was 7.6 ± 4.7 (2–18) h between ICU admission and endoscopic intervention, and was 35.5 ± 14.5 (5–48) h between the seizure and endoscopic intervention. A 100% technical success was achieved. Except for one mild pancreatitis, no other complication occurred. Patients showed good responses to endoscopic interventions, which were reflected by ameliorated disease severities and laboratory findings. Time lengths of ICU stay and total in-hospital stay were 8.7 ± 4.9 (2–23) days and 14.5 ± 7.4 (5–39) days, respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in three patients. According to a 6-month follow-up, two patients died of pneumonia and acute myocardial infarction. No SAC and/or biliary stone residual occurred. The current intervention demonstrated favorable results compared to traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Our study provides a novel bedside endoscopic intervention method for SAC caused by choledocholithiasis.

Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We assessed efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as first-line intervention in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until 01 /12 /2023 for randomized controlled trials of EUS-BD vs. ERCP for primary biliary drainage in patients with inoperable MDBO. The primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, adverse events, mean procedure time, 1-year stent patency, and overall survival. Relative risk (RR) with 95 %CI were calculated using a random effects model. Five studies (519 patients) were included. RR (95 %CI) for EUS-BD was 1.06 (0.96 to 1.17; P = 0.27) for pooled technical success and 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45) for clinical success. 1-year stent patency was similar between the groups (RR 1.15, 0.94 to 1.42; P = 0.17), with lower reintervention with EUS-BD (RR 0.58, 0.37 to 0.9; P = 0.01). The RR was 0.85 (0.49 to 1.46; P = 0.55) for adverse events and 0.97 (0.10 to 0.17; P = 0.98) for severe adverse events. On subgroup analysis, EUS-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) outperformed ERCP in terms of technical success (RR 1.17, 1.01 to 1.35; P = 0.03). Procedure time was lower with EUS-BD (standardized mean difference -2.36 minutes [-2.68 to -2.05; P < 0.001]). EUS-BD showed a statistically significant lower reintervention rate than ERCP, but with similar technical success, stent patency, clinical success, and safety. Technical success of EUS-BD with LAMS was better than ERCP.

Proximal Stent Migration of Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent following Side-by-Side Deployment in the Patient with Klatskin Tumor: A Case Report

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is a malignant tumor that causes biliary stenosis and bile drainage problems, which can lead to elevated liver enzymes and jaundice. Endoscopic biliary drainage performed to treat MHBO is essential to improve treatment, survival rate, and patients’ quality of life. However, the biliary drainage in MHBO is technically challenging because of its anatomical complexity, and the successful palliation of cholestasis is less frequent in MHBO than in distal biliary obstruction. In this article, we report a case of proximal stent migration of fully covered self-expandable metal stent following side-by-side deployment in the patient with Klatskin tumor. It is expected that it will be of great help if various preventive methods to reduce stent migration are developed in the future.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural Biliary Drainage With 6 mm and 8mm Cautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Metal Stents: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be unsuccessful in patients with duodenal stenosis or malignant ampullary infiltration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an alternative. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD for malignant distal bile duct obstruction using the newly introduced smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm cautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent. A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients with unresectable malignant distal bile duct obstruction who underwent EUS-BD between 2021 and 2022 after unsuccessful ERCP. Thirty-two patients were included [7 (53.13%) males], with a mean age of 72.2 ± 12.5 years. The technical success rate was 100%. Altered anatomy was present in 2 (6.25%). The indication for drainage was biliary obstruction from pancreatic cancer in 26 patients (84.5%), cholangiocarcinoma in 3 (9.4%), and ampullary mass in 3 (9.4%). The procedure was performed mostly in an outpatient setting (n = 19, 59.38%). The clinical success rate was 92.3% [bilirubin: 14.1 (SD: 8.9) preprocedure vs 4.9 (SD: 1.1) postprocedure; P = 0.0001]. There was one early adverse event of a perforation, which was closed endoscopically and drained percutaneously. Delayed adverse events included food impaction of the stent (n = 1), which was resolved with a repeat procedure and insertion of a double pigtail stent. This study demonstrates the feasibility of EUS-BD drainage using smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm lumen-apposing metal stent to relieve malignant distal bile duct obstruction in patients who fail conventional ERCP.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A case series and review of literature

Abstract Obstructive jaundice is a common clinical manifestation of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Pancreaticobiliary malignancy causes a significant proportion of distal biliary obstructions, most of which are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Palliative biliary drainage is required in cases of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Surgical, endoscopic, or percutaneous methods can relieve biliary obstruction. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is the most common alternative method if endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The complication rate of PTBD and associated comorbidities is high. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has two access routes, i.e., intrahepatic and extrahepatic. The technical and clinical success rate of EUS-BD is high, exceeding 90%. When ERCP fails, the EUS rendezvous approach should be attempted first if papilla is accessible. Transmural drainage is the preferred method if the papilla is inaccessible. For distal and mid-common bile duct obstruction, we perform EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS). For EUS-CDS, one can use either a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) or a lumen-apposing metal stent. EUS-BD procedures are technically challenging, and adverse events are common even in expert hands. A multidisciplinary approach is most appropriate for patients with distal MBO who fail ERCP.

Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage vs percutaneous transhepatic bile duct drainage in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice.

Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) is a condition characterized by varying degrees of bile duct stenosis and obstruction, accompanied by the progressive development of malignant tumors, leading to high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, the two most commonly employed methods for its management are percutaneous transhepatic bile duct drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). While both methods have demonstrated favorable outcomes, additional research needs to be performed to determine their relative efficacy. To compare the therapeutic effectiveness of EUS-BD and PTBD in treating MOJ. This retrospective analysis, conducted between September 2015 and April 2023 at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (The First People's Hospital of Changzhou), involved 68 patients with MOJ. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of surgical procedure received: EUS-BD subgroup (n = 33) and PTBD subgroup (n = 35). Variables such as general data, preoperative and postoperative indices, blood routine, liver function indices, myocardial function indices, operative success rate, clinical effectiveness, and complication rate were analyzed and compared between the subgroups. In the EUS-BD subgroup, hospital stay duration, bile drainage volume, effective catheter time, and clinical effectiveness rate were superior to those in the PTBD subgroup, although the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The puncture time for the EUS-BD subgroup was shorter than that for the PTBD subgroup (P < 0.05). Postoperative blood routine, liver function index, and myocardial function index in the EUS-BD subgroup were significantly lower than those in the PTBD subgroup (P < 0.05). Additionally, the complication rate in the EUS-BD subgroup was lower than in the PTBD subgroup (P < 0.05). EUS-BD may reduce the number of punctures, improve liver and myocardial functions, alleviate traumatic stress, and decrease complication rates in MOJ treatment.

Intraprocedural hologram support with mixed-reality technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

Intraprocedural hologram support with mixed-reality technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

Impact of biliary drainage method before pancreaticoduodenectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with periampullary carcinoma and obstructive jaundice: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe optima preoperative biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with biliary tract and pancreatic cancer remains controversial. MethodsA total of 898 patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage via endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage, endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage, or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage before pancreaticoduodenectomy for biliary tract and pancreatic cancer were included. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. ResultsThe Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 morbidity rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy were higher in the endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (21.9%; P = .001) or endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage (20.2%; P = .007) than in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (9.7%) groups. In biliary tract cancer, the frequency of dissemination after pancreaticoduodenectomy was higher in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (15.3%) than in the endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (0.7%; P = .001) and endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage (4.1%; P = .037) groups; percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was an independent factor associated with worse disease-free survival (P = .04), whereas in pancreatic cancer the frequency of dissemination and survival was comparable among the 3 preoperative biliary drainage methods. Albumin <3.9 g/dL was independently associated with worse overall survival in patients with both pancreatic (P = .038) and biliary tract (P = .002) cancers, respectively. During biliary drainage, external drainage (P = .038) was independently associated with albumin <3.9 g/dL; albumin was higher in endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage group than in endoscopic transnasal biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage groups after 21 days from tube insertion. ConclusionIn biliary tract cancer, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may carry the risk of increasing the incidence of disseminative recurrence. In pancreatic cancer, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is preferable owing to fewer complications without influencing recurrence. However, if patients cannot undergo surgery immediately, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage will be applicable to help the preservation of nutritional status, which can have an impact on survival.

Gerbode defect resulting from Group B Streptococcus infective endocarditis: a case report

BackgroundGerbode defect is an unusual abnormal communication between the left ventricle and the right atrium and is a serious complication of aortic infective endocarditis. Group B Streptococcus is an uncommon cause of infective endocarditis and has a markedly destructive effect on valvular tissue. Acute fistulation between the left ventricle and the right atrium associated with this form of infective endocarditis is a life-threatening, aggressive complication that often requires urgent surgical intervention. However, the identification of actual communication is often extremely difficult. Herein, we describe an unusual case of Gerbode defect resulting from Group B Streptococcus infective endocarditis and discuss the issues surrounding such a rare cardiac defect and such an infection.Case presentationA 60-year-old man with underlying uncontrolled diabetes mellitus underwent endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage for acute cholangitis. On the 10th postoperative day, the patient developed multiple acute cerebral embolisms. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe aortic regurgitation and a large mobile vegetation near the tricuspid annulus. No obvious fistula between the left ventricle and the right atrium could be demonstrated. The blood culture examination was positive for Group B Streptococcus. The patient was diagnosed with Group B Streptococcus infective endocarditis, and antibiotic therapy was initiated. Transesophageal echocardiogram performed after referral to our hospital confirmed detachment of the right coronary cusp of the aortic valve from the annulus and an abnormal cavity immediately below the right coronary cusp. Color Doppler imaging finally revealed systolic blood flows from the left ventricle into the right atrium through the cavity. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with Gerbode defect resulting from Group B Streptococcus infective endocarditis. In addition to aortic valve replacement, defect closure and left ventricular outflow tract repair were successfully performed urgently for severely complicated and uncommon infective endocarditis. The patient was uneventfully discharged without any complications.ConclusionsWe reported successful surgical treatment of unusual active IE and Gerbode defect caused by GBS. Careful preoperative echocardiographic work-up is imperative for accurate early diagnosis and successful repair.