Background and Aims: International guidelines suggest different possibilities for drying of endoscopes during reprocessing. Clinical results of these available drying methods are not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare the drying cycle of a standard endoscope washer-disinfector (EWD) (standard drying method [SD]) with a shortened mandatory drying by the EWD followed by a special drying device using laminar and turbulent air flow (novel drying method [ND]). Patients and methods: Sixty endoscopes (duodenoscopes, colonoscocopes and gastroscopes) from three different manufacturers underwent high-level disinfection and drying depending on the randomization group. Operational time of drying was measured for both groups. Residual fluid in the channels was measured using a laboratory scale. After a 14 day storage period, a sample of the endoscope channels was obtained to determine bacterial contamination. Results: ND had significantly fewer residual water in endoscope channels (SD: 90% vs ND: 0%; p < 0.001) after high-level disinfection and drying, and less bacterial contamination after storage for 14 days (SD: 47% vs ND: 20%; p = 0.028). Time consumed for drying in ND was also significantly shorter (SD: 16min 4sec vs ND: 5min 59sec; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Drying with a special automatic drying device was superior compared with an EWD’s drying program as evidenced by no measurable residual water, reduced microbiological contamination and a more than two-fold decrease in operational time. Thus, drying by laminar and turbulent airflow may represent an attractive alternative to the currently used standard approach in the reprocessing process of flexible endoscopes.