Endogenous Pain Modulatory Mechanisms Research Articles

Single-neuron projectome-guided analysis reveals the neural circuit mechanism underlying endogenous opioid antinociception.

Endogenous opioid antinociception is a self-regulatory mechanism that reduces chronic pain, but its underlying circuit mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we showed that endogenous opioid antinociception required the activation of mu-opioid receptors (MORs) in GABAergic neurons of the central amygdala nucleus (CEA) in a persistent-hyperalgesia mouse model. Pharmacogenetic suppression of these CEAMOR neurons, which mimics the effect of MOR activation, alleviated the persistent hyperalgesia. Furthermore, single-neuron projection analysis revealed multiple projectome-based subtypes of CEAMOR neurons, each innervating distinct target brain regions. We found that the suppression of axon branches projecting to the parabrachial nucleus (PB) of one subtype of CEAMOR neurons alleviated persistent hyperalgesia, indicating a subtype- and axonal-branch-specific mechanism of action. Further electrophysiological analysis revealed that suppression of a distinct CEA-PB disinhibitory circuit controlled endogenous opioid antinociception. Thus, this study identified the central neural circuit that underlies endogenous opioid antinociception, providing new insight into the endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms.

Impact of endogenous analgesia triggered by acupuncture, stress, or noxious stimulation on REM sleep-deprived rats.

Poor sleep increases pain, at least in part, by disrupting endogenous pain modulation. However, the efficacy of endogenous analgesia in sleep-deprived subjects has never been tested. To assess this issue, we chose three different ways of triggering endogenous analgesia: (1) acupuncture, (2) acute stress, and (3) noxious stimulation, and compared their ability to decrease the pronociceptive effect induced by REM-SD (Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Deprivation) with that to decrease inflammatory hyperalgesia in the classical carrageenan model. First, we tested the ability of REM-SD to worsen carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia: Alow dose of carrageenan (30 µg) in sleep-deprived Wistar rats resulted in a potentiated hyperalgesic effectthat was more intense and longer-lasting than that induced by a higher standard dose of carrageenan (100 µg) or by REM-SD alone. Then, we found that (1) acupuncture, performed at ST36, completely reversed the pronociceptive effect induced by REM-SD or by carrageenan; (2) immobilization stress completely reversed the pronociceptive effect of REM-SD, while transiently inhibited carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia; (3) noxious stimulation of the forepaw by capsaicin also reversed the pronociceptive effect of REM-SD and persistently increased the nociceptive threshold above the baseline in carrageenan-treated animals. Therefore, acupuncture, stress, or noxious stimulation reversed the pronociceptive effect of REM-SD, while each intervention affected carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia differently. This study has shown that while sleep loss may disrupt endogenous pain modulation mechanisms, it does not prevent theactivation of these mechanisms to induce analgesia in sleep-deprived individuals.

Reliability and minimal detectable change of dynamic temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation using a single experimental paradigm.

Quantitative sensory tests (QST) are frequently used to explore alterations in somatosensory systems. Static and dynamic QST like pain threshold and temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are commonly used to evaluate excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms involved in pain processing. The aim of the present study was to document the reliability and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of these dynamic QST measurements using a standardized experimental paradigm. Forty-six (46) pain-free participants took part in 2 identical sessions to collect TS and CPM outcomes. Mechanical (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) and thermal (constant 2-minute heat pain stimulation [HPS]) nociceptive stimuli were applied as test stimuli, before and after a cold-water bath (conditioning stimulus). TS was interpreted as the change in pain perception scores during HPS. CPM were determined by calculating the difference in pain perception between pre- and post- water bath for both PPT and HPS. Relative and absolute reliability were analyzed with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2, k), standard error of the measurements (SEMeas) and MDC. Results revealed a good to excellent relative reliability for static QST (ICC ≥ 0.73). For TS, a poor to moderate relative reliability depending on the calculation methods (ICC = 0.25 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.59), and a poor relative reliability for CPM (ICC = 0.16 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.37), both when measured with mechanical stimulation (PPT) and thermal stimulation (HPS). Absolute reliability varied from 0.73 to 7.74 for static QST, 11 to 22 points for TS and corresponded to 11.42 points and 1.56 points for thermal and mechanical-induced CPM, respectively. MDC analyses revealed that a change of 1.58 to 21.46 point for static QST, 31 to 52 points for TS and 4 to 31 points for CPM is necessary to be interpreted as a real change. Our approach seems well-suited to clinical use. Although our method shows equivalent relative and absolute reliability compared to other protocols, we found that the reliability of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms is vulnerable, probably due to its dynamic nature.

Differential Effects of Thermal Stimuli in Eliciting Temporal Contrast Enhancement: A Psychophysical Study

Offset analgesia (OA) is observed when pain relief is disproportional to the reduction of noxious input and is based on temporal contrast enhancement (TCE). This phenomenon is believed to reflect the function of the inhibitory pain modulatory system. However, the mechanisms contributing to this phenomenon remain poorly understood, with previous research focusing primarily on painful stimuli and not generalizing to nonpainful stimuli. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether TCE can be induced by noxious as well as innocuous heat and cold stimuli. Asymptomatic subjects (n = 50) were recruited to participate in 2 consecutive experiments. In the first pilot study (n = 17), the parameters of noxious and innocuous heat and cold stimuli were investigated in order to implement them in the main study. In the second (main) experiment, subjects (n = 33) participated in TCE paradigms consisting of 4 different modalities, including noxious heat (NH), innocuous heat (IH), noxious cold (NC), and innocuous cold (IC). The intensity of the sensations of each thermal modality was assessed using an electronic visual analog scale. TCE was confirmed for NH (P < .001), NC (P = .034), and IC (P = .002). Conversely, TCE could not be shown for IH (P = 1.00). No significant correlation between TCE modalities was found (r < .3, P > .05). The results suggest that TCE can be induced by both painful and nonpainful thermal stimulation but not by innocuous warm temperature. The exact underlying mechanisms need to be clarified. However, among other potential mechanisms, this may be explained by a thermo-specific activation of C-fiber afferents by IH and of A-fiber afferents by IC, suggesting the involvement of A-fibers rather than C-fibers in TCE. More research is needed to confirm a peripheral influence. PerspectiveThis psychophysical study presents the observation of temporal contrast enhancement during NH, NC, and innocuous cold stimuli but not during stimulation with innocuous warm temperatures in healthy volunteers. A better understanding of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms might be helpful in explaining the underlying aspects of pain disorders.

Relationship between Motor Corticospinal System, Endogenous Pain Modulation Mechanisms and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: New Perspectives on an Old Disease.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful condition characterized by joint and bone changes. A growing number of studies suggest that these changes only partially explain the pain experienced by individuals with OA. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate if corticospinal and bulbospinal projection measurements were interrelated in patients with knee OA, and to explore the relationship between these neurophysiological measures and temporal summation (excitatory mechanisms of pain) on one hand, and clinical symptoms on the other. Twenty-eight (28) patients with knee OA were recruited. Corticospinal projections were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation, while bulbospinal projections were evaluated with a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) protocol using a counter-irritation paradigm. Validated questionnaires were used to document clinical and psychological manifestations. All participants suffered from moderate to severe pain. There was a positive association between corticospinal excitability and the effectiveness of the CPM (rs = 0.67, p = 0.01, n = 13). There was also a positive relationship between pain intensity and corticospinal excitability (rs = 0.45, p = 0.03, n = 23), and between pain intensity and temporal summation (rs = 0.58, p = 0.01, n = 18). The results of this study highlight some of the central nervous system changes that could be involved in knee OA and underline the importance of interindividual variability to better understand and explain the semiology and pathophysiology of knee OA.

INFLUENCE OF PRE-SURGICAL CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION ON POST-SURGICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Purpose: Chronic pain after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is prevalent in approximately 20-35% of patients undergoing surgery. Endogenous pain modulation mechanisms in the central nervous system influences the ultimate pain experience. Accordingly, pre-operative central pain modulatory processes may influence longitudinal outcomes following TKR surgery. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the association between preoperative central modulation of pain as measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and post-operative outcomes (pain and function) in patients who underwent TKR due to knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model of Pain Modulation Profile to Guide Chronic Pain Treatment: A Study Protocol.

Introduction: Quantitative sensory testing is frequently used in research to assess endogenous pain modulation mechanisms, such as Temporal Summation (TS) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), reflecting excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms, respectively. Numerous studies found that a dysregulation of these mechanisms is associated with chronic pain conditions. In turn, such a patient's “profile” (increased TS and/or weakened CPM) could be used to recommend different pharmacological treatments. However, the procedure to evaluate these mechanisms is time-consuming and requires expensive equipment that is not available in the clinical setting. In this study, we aim to identify psychological, physiological and socio-demographic markers that could serve as proxies to allow healthcare professionals to identify these pain phenotypes in clinic, and consequently optimize pharmacological treatments.Method: We aim to recruit a healthy participant cohort (n = 360) and a chronic pain patient cohort (n = 108). Independent variables will include psychological questionnaires, pain measurements, physiological measures and sociodemographic characteristics. Dependent variables will include TS and CPM, which will be measured using quantitative sensory testing in a single session. We will evaluate one prediction model and two validation models (for healthy and chronic pain participants) using multiple regression analysis between TS/CPM and our independent variables. The significance thresholds will be set at p = 0.05, respectively.Perspectives: This study will allow us to develop a predictive model to compute the pain modulation profile of individual patients based on their biopsychosocial characteristics. The development of the predictive model is the first step toward the overarching goal of providing clinicians with a set of quick and cheap tests, easily applicable in clinical practice to orient pharmacological treatments.

Spatial aspects of pain modulation are not disrupted in adolescents with migraine.

To compare spatial pain modulation capabilities between adolescents with and without migraine. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) responses at the leg are similar in adolescents with versus without migraine. However, the anatomical region of testing may affect spatial pain modulation capabilities as differences in nociceptive processing between patients with migraine and healthy controls are found in local areas that are near the site of clinical pain but not in nonlocal areas. This study aimed to examine spatial pain modulation capabilities tested by the CPM paradigm using test stimulus applied to a local body area. Nineteen adolescents with migraine (age 14.9±2.3, mean±SD; 16 female) and 20 healthy adolescents (age 13.8±2.5, mean±SD; 16 female) completed this case-control study at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were assessed at the trapezius before and during immersion of the foot in a cold water bath (8°C). In the migraine group (146.0±79.1, mean±SD), compared to healthy controls (248.0±145.5, mean±SD), significantly lower PPT (kilopascal) values were found (estimate=124.28, 95% CI: 58.98, 189.59, p<0.001; effect size: d=1.40). No differences between the groups were found for pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings of cold-water immersion nor the CPM response. This study found altered ascending nociceptive processing of mechanical stimuli at the neck in adolescents with migraine. However, endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms were functional and not altered. In light of other studies, impairments in inhibitory control may not be involved in migraine pathophysiology in pediatric patients regardless of stimulus location.

Pain Modulation Mechanisms in ASD Adults

We tested endogenous pain modulation mechanisms in adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Nineteen ASD adults without intellectual disabilities were included, matched with 19 healthy volunteers on the basis of sex and chronological age. An experimental pain model was used to measure excitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms in a single session. Statistical analyses indicated that endogenous pain modulation mechanisms in ASD group did not differ significantly from those of healthy adults. The pain scores were very disparate in ASD group with a greater range of extreme scores than in control group. Unlike schizophrenic patients, there was no systematic dysfunction of endogenous excitatory pain modulation mechanisms, but the high variability requires to be wise to interpret the results and formulate conclusion.

Impact of Therapeutic Interventions on Pain Intensity and Endogenous Pain Modulation in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

To study the impact of therapeutic interventions on pain analgesia and endogenous pain modulation in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched for KOA randomized clinical trials and observational studies with data on therapeutic interventions comparing pain intensity, temporal summation (TS), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) scores relative to control. These data were pooled as Hedge's g. To study the relationship between pain intensity and TS/CPM, we performed metaregression with 10,000 Monte-Carlo permutations. We reviewed 11 studies (559 participants). On studying all the interventions together, we found no significant changes in pain modulation, TS, or CPM. Our findings show that this lack of difference is likely because surgical and nonsurgical interventions resulted in contrary effects. Metaregression significantly correlated pain reduction with normalization of TS and CPM. We demonstrate an association between pain reduction and TS/CPM normalization. Though we cannot directly compare these interventions, the results allow us to draw hypotheses on potential practice schemas. Recovering defective endogenous pain modulation mechanisms may help establish long-term analgesia. However, to validate these paradigms as robust clinical biomarkers, further investigation into their mechanisms would be necessary. The registration number for this review is CRD42017072066.

Deficient habituation to repeated rectal distensions in irritable bowel syndrome patients with visceral hypersensitivity.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients show evidence of altered central processing of visceral signals. One of the proposed alterations in sensory processing is an altered engagement of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms. The aim was to test the hypothesis that IBS patients with (IBS-S) and without visceral hypersensitivity (IBS-N) differ in their ability to engage endogenous pain modulation mechanism during habituation to repeated visceral stimuli. Brain blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response was measured during repeated rectal distension and its anticipation in 33 IBS patients with and without visceral hypersensitivity and 18 healthy controls (HCs). BOLD response to early and late phase of the distension series was compared within and between groups. While BOLD response was similar during the early phase of the experiment, IBS-S showed greater BOLD response than IBS-N and HCs during the late phase of the distension series. IBS-S showed increasing BOLD response both to the anticipation and delivery of low intensity rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, anterior and mid cingulate cortex. IBS-N showed decreasing BOLD response to repeated rectal distensions in brain regions including insula, prefrontal cortex and amygdala. These findings are consistent with compromised ability of IBS-S to respond to repeated delivery of rectal stimuli, both in terms of sensitization of sensory pathways and habituation of emotional arousal. The fact that both IBS subgroups met Rome criteria, and did not differ in terms of reported symptom severity demonstrates that similar symptom patterns can result from different underlying neurobiological mechanisms.

Psychophysical and cerebral responses to heat stimulation in patients with central pain, painless central sensory loss, and in healthy persons

Patients with central pain (CP) typically have chronic pain within an area of reduced pain and temperature sensation, suggesting an impairment of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms. We tested the hypothesis that some brain structures normally activated by cutaneous heat stimulation would be hyperresponsive among patients with CP but not among patients with a central nervous system lesion causing a loss of heat or nociceptive sensation with no pain (NP). We used H 2 15O positron emission tomography to measure, in 15 healthy control participants, 10 NP patients, and 10 CP patients, increases in regional cerebral blood flow among volumes of interest (VOI) from the resting (no stimulus) condition during bilateral contact heat stimulation at heat detection, heat pain threshold, and heat pain tolerance levels. Both patient groups had a reduced perception of heat intensity and unpleasantness on the clinically affected side and a bilateral impairment of heat detection. Compared with the HC group, both NP and CP patients had more hyperactive and hypoactive VOI in the resting state and more hyperresponsive and hyporesponsive VOI during heat stimulation. Compared with NP patients, CP patients had more hyperresponsive VOI in the intralaminar thalamus and sensory–motor cortex during heat stimulation. Our results show that focal CNS lesions produce bilateral sensory deficits and widespread changes in the nociceptive excitability of the brain. The increased nociceptive excitability within the intralaminar thalamus and sensory–motor cortex of our sample of CP patients suggests an underlying pathophysiology for the pain in some central pain syndromes.

Evolution of Neonatal Care: What about the Consequences on Endogenous Pain Modulation Mechanisms?

Evolution of Neonatal Care: What about the Consequences on Endogenous Pain Modulation Mechanisms?

Preterm births: Can neonatal pain alter the development of endogenous gating systems?

Prematurity is known to affect the development of various neurophysiological systems, including the maturation of pain and cardiac circuits. The purpose of this study was to see if numerous painful interventions, experienced soon after birth, affect counterirritation-induced analgesia (triggered using the cold pressor test) later in life. A total of 26 children, between the ages of 7 and 11 participated in the study. Children were divided into three groups, according to their birth status (i.e., term-born, born preterm and exposed to numerous painful interventions, or born preterm and exposed to few painful interventions). Primary outcome measures were heat pain thresholds, heat sensitivity scores, and cardiac reactivity. Results showed that preterm children and term-born children had comparable pain thresholds. Exposure to conditioning cold stimulation significantly increased heart rate and significantly decreased the thermal pain sensitivity of term-born children. These physiological reactions were also observed among preterm children who were only exposed to a few painful interventions at birth. Changes in heart rate and pain sensitivity in response to conditioning cold stimulation were not observed in preterm children that had been exposed to numerous painful procedures during the neonatal period. These results suggest that early pain does not lead to enhanced pain sensitivity when premature babies become children, but that their endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms are not as well developed as those of children not exposed to noxious insult at birth. Greater frequency of painful procedures also dampened the rise in heart rate normally observed when experimental pain is experienced.

Endogenous pain modulation during the formalin test in estrogen receptor beta knockout mice

The involvement of estrogen in pain has been investigated in many ways. However the specific role played by estrogen receptors remains elusive. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta mediate different physiological functions. For example, estrogen receptor beta is more closely related to non-reproductive effects than the alpha subtype is. To verify the involvement of estrogen receptor beta on acute and persistent pain as well as on endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms, hotplate and formalin tests were carried out in wild type (WT) and estrogen receptor beta knockout (ERβ KO) mice of both sexes. Ovariectomies followed by estrogen and progesterone replacement were performed in female groups to insure comparable sex hormone levels. We found that nociceptive responses are lower in ERβ KO female than in WT female mice during the interphase and early tonic phase II of the formalin test but not during acute and late tonic phases. Moreover, behavioral and spinal (c-Fos) differences were only observed in females. ERβ KO females had lower c-Fos expression in laminae I–II and IV–V of the spinal cord than WT females. These results suggest that estrogen, through its actions on ERβ, dampens the efficacy of endogenous pain modulation mechanisms during the interphase and/or inflammation process in the early phase II, triggering an increase in spinal nociceptive neuronal activity. This confirms our previous observations that estrogen specifically influences nociceptive responses during the interphase of the formalin test and demonstrates a role for ERβ on endogenous pain modulation systems.

Sex differences in opioid-mediated pain inhibitory mechanisms during the interphase in the formalin test

Many chronic pain conditions are more prevalent in women than men and both fundamental and clinical research supports the implication of endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. The goal of this study was to verify if sex differences on endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms during the formalin test are opioidergic and modulated by sex hormones. Formalin tests were performed with naloxone hydrochloride, a non-selective opioid antagonist in intact and gonadectomized Sprague–Dawley rats of both sexes. Considering the sexual dimorphisms we found, where naloxone preferentially blocked the interphase in female rats, injections of all the possible combinations of μ- (naltrexone hydrochloride), δ- (naltrindole hydrochloride) and κ-selective antagonists (norbinaltorphimine dihydrochloride) were given to evaluate the contribution of these opioid-receptor subtypes to the inhibitory mechanism during the interphase in intact females. Finally, the systemic administration of naloxone methiodide and intrathecal administration of naloxone hydrochloride in intact females allowed us to verify if the action of endogenous opioids that are liberated during the interphase takes place at the periphery or spinally, respectively. The results show that the interphase was almost completely inhibited by naloxone in females while it produced only a slight blockade in males. These results permitted us to conclude that opioids play a major role in the pain inhibitory mechanism of the interphase in females while a non-opioid mechanism seems to be responsible for this inhibitory pathway in males. Using gonadectomized animals of both sexes, we demonstrated the modulation of the opioidergic system of the interphase by sex hormones. The administration of different combinations of selective antagonists for μ-, κ- and δ-opioid receptors in intact females permitted us to conclude that only the combination of κ- and δ-selective antagonists significantly blocked the interphase. The same result was obtained with the combination of the three antagonists, confirming the results with systemic naloxone hydrochloride. Finally, intrathecal administration permitted us to support that the action of naloxone is primarily at the spinal level, even if a supraspinal action cannot be ruled out. These results are of particular interest in showing sexual dimorphisms in endogenous pain modulation mechanisms during the interphase of the formalin test. A clearer understanding of the difference between male and female endogenous pain inhibitory pathways should lead to a better understanding of the role of endogenous pain modulation deficits in certain chronic pain conditions.