Endogenous Insulin Secretion Research Articles

Practice guideline: Statement regarding treatment for suspected slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM; probable) cases (English version).

Insulin treatment should be introduced in patients with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM; definite), according to the revised diagnostic criteria of SPIDDM (2023). In contrast, SPIDDM (probable) patients are in a non-insulin-dependent state; therefore, a more flexible treatment can be considered, although sulfonylurea agents should be avoided. Insulin treatment has been shown to maintain endogenous insulin secretion capacity in SPIDDM (probable); however, this does not mean that all SPIDDM (probable) patients should use insulin from the early phase. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and biguanides might be the treatment of choice for SPIDDM (probable), but no evidence exists for other hypoglycemic agents. In any case, careful monitoring of the endogenous insulin secretion capacity should be carried out, and if a decrease in insulin secretion capacity is suspected, a change in treatment should be considered to prevent progression to an insulin-dependent state.

Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Framework for Recommendations for Their Potential Use.

The growing prevalence of overweight/obesity, the persistence of inadequate glycemic control among themajority of affected individuals, and thestill unacceptably high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among population with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), impose an urgent need for theintroduction of non-insulin glucose-lowering agents in the therapeutic armamentarium. Given thattheir antihyperglycemic mechanism of action is independent of endogenous insulin secretion and thatthe observed cardio-renal benefits are unrelated to their glucose-lowering properties, one can speculate that the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) could provide benefits in T1D, similar to the ones observed among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure. Available evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that treatment with SGLT2is as adjunct to insulin in T1D results in modest reductions in glycated hemoglobin and body weight. Additionally, SGLT2is ameliorate albuminuria, and thus delay or prevent thedevelopment of CKD inT1D. However, use of SGLT2is is associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in T1D. This commentary aims at providing a framework for practical recommendations regarding the potential use of SGLT2is in adults with T1D, based on the individual's risk level for DKA development, the presence of inadequate glycemic control and related cardio-renal complications.

12518 Development Of A Four-compartment, Dynamic (In Vivo) Model For Insulin Disposition In Healthy Humans: Use Of Fick’s Law To Model Plasma-interstitial Insulin Flux

Abstract Disclosure: R.I. Dorin: None. C.R. Qualls: None. Introduction: Metabolic elimination of insulin (I) in vivo includes pathways mediated by high-affinity and potentially saturable insulin receptor binding; endogenous insulin secreted into the portal vein is subject to first pass elimination. The rate of insulin flux between vascular (Vp) and interstitial (Vi) compartments is often modeled by first order rate constants; here we analyzed an alternative approach using Fick’s law. Methods: The four-compartment, insulin (I) model is expressed by four differential equations that represent I flow (mass/time) in 4 volumes (V) (or compartments) having 3 corresponding elimination rate functions (α): (i) vascular plasma (Vp), (ii) interstitial (Vi, αi), (iii) hepatic (Vh, αh), and (iv) kidney (Vk, αk). Fick’s law was used to model diffusion of insulin between Vp and Vi; Michaelis-Menten like functions were used for saturable elimination functions (αh and αi); rates of hepatic (HPF) and renal (KPF) plasma flow were from literature. Realistic bounds for solved parameters (insulin permeability constant [k, L/min] and αi [min-[1]]) were developed by test bed analysis of published plasma (Ip) and interstitial (Ii) insulin concentration data. The inverse problem (estimating parameters) used Ip data from insulin-modified, frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance (IM-FSIVGT) studies performed in 40 healthy, non-diabetic women (1). Parameter solutions for individual subjects were obtained by iterative least squares method minimizing differences between model-predicted and measured Ip. Results: For infusion of exogenous I (ZI) at a constant rate (e.g., insulin clamp), reported steady state Ii/Ip data suggest that interstitial insulin elimination (αi) is conditionally saturable. Together with non-steady state data for Ip and Ii, initial estimates of k and αi were obtained. Steady state solutions give rise to four algebraic equations: (1) Ii/Ip = a, where a < 1 is consistent with experimental data, (2) Ih is a reduced version of a linear combination of Ip and endogenous insulin secretion (Zβ), where the factor of reduction (b) is <1, (3) Ik/Ip = d, where d<1, and (4) Ip is a linear combination of (i) ZI and (ii) the reduced (by factor b) Zβ. For Ip, this linear combination of ZI and reduced Zβ is also normalized by factor c (weighted sum of k, HPF, and KPF). Conclusions: (i) The proposed insulin flow model using Fick’s law was advantageous in providing realistic parameters and solutions that are tractable to physiologic interpretation, (ii) a simplified version of this model is generalizable to C-peptide, and (iii) since measurement of Ii is impractical in the clinical setting, the proposed prediction model may provide useful modeling adjunct to personalize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic strategies for insulin administered by subcutaneous, iv, and hybrid closed-loop insulin pump routes. 1. Gower et al. Nutrition & Metabolism (2016) 13:2 Presentation: 6/1/2024

Human Stem Cell Therapy for the Cure of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D): A Hurdle Course between Lights and Shadows

Background: T1D is a severe metabolic disorder due to selective autoimmune pancreatic islet β-cell killing, which results in complete abrogation of endogenous insulin secretion. The affected patients, once the disease is clinically overt, must immediately undertake insulin supplementation according to intensive therapy regimens to prevent the onset of acute and chronic complications, some of them potentially lethal. Replacement of the destroyed β-cells with fresh and vital pancreatic endocrine tissue, either of the whole organ or isolated islets transplantation, started a few decades ago with progressively encouraging results, although exogenous insulin withdrawal was obtained in a minor cohort of the treated patients. The restricted availability of donor organs coupled with general immunosuppression treatment of recipients to avoid graft immune rejection may, at least partially, explain the limited success achieved by these procedures. Results: The introduction of pluripotent stem cells (either of human embryonic origin or adult cells genetically induced to pluripotency) that can be differentiated toward insulin secretory β-like cells could provide an indefinite resource for insulin-producing cells (IPCs). Conclusions: Because the use of human embryos may encounter ethical problems, employment of adult multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) extracted from several tissues may represent an alternative option. MSCs are associated with strong immunoregulatory properties that can alter early stages of β-cell-directed autoimmunity in T1D, other than holding the potential to differentiate themselves into β-like cells. Lights and shadows of these new strategies for the potential cure of T1D and their advancement state are reviewed.

Plasma proteomics in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes identifies new potential biomarkers of partial remission

Partial remission (PR) occurs in only half of people with new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and corresponds to a transient period characterized by low daily insulin needs, low glycemic fluctuations and increased endogenous insulin secretion. While identification of people with newly-onset T1D and significant residual beta-cell function may foster patient-specific interventions, reliable predictive biomarkers of PR occurrence currently lack. We analyzed the plasma of children with new-onset T1D to identify biomarkers present at diagnosis that predicted PR at 3 months post-diagnosis. We first performed an extensive shotgun proteomic analysis using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem-Mass-Spectrometry (LCMS/MS) on the plasma of 16 children with new-onset T1D and quantified 98 proteins significantly correlating with Insulin-Dose Adjusted glycated hemoglobin A1c score (IDAA1C). We next applied a series of both qualitative and statistical filters and selected protein candidates that were associated to pathophysiological mechanisms related to T1D. Finally, we translationally verified several of the candidates using single-shot targeted proteomic (PRM method) on raw plasma. Taken together, we identified plasma biomarkers present at diagnosis that may predict the occurrence of PR in a single mass-spectrometry run. We believe that the identification of new predictive biomarkers of PR and β-cell function is key to stratify people with new-onset T1D for β-cell preservation therapies.

α- or β-Adrenergic blockade does not affect transplanted islet cell responses to hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes recipients of intrahepatic islet transplantation exhibit glucose-dependent suppression of insulin and activation of glucagon secretion in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia associated with clinical protection from hypoglycemia. Whether sympathetic activation of adrenergic receptors on transplanted islets is required for these responses in defense against hypoglycemia is not known. To evaluate the adrenergic contribution to posttransplant glucose counterregulation, we performed a randomized, double-blind crossover study of responses during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic clamp under phentolamine (α-adrenergic blockage), propranolol (β-adrenergic blockage), or placebo infusion. Characteristics of participants (5 females/4 males) were as follows: median (range) age 53 (34-63) yr, diabetes duration 29 (18-56) yr, posttransplant 7.0 (1.9-8.4) yr, HbA1c 5.8 (4.5-6.8)%, insulin in-/dependent 5/4, all on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. During the clamp, blood pressure was lower with phentolamine and heart rate was lower with propranolol versus placebo (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the suppression of endogenous insulin secretion (derived from C-peptide measurements) during the euglycemic or hypoglycemic phases, and although levels of glucagon were similar with phentolamine or propranolol vs. placebo, the increase in glucagon from eu- to hypoglycemia was greater with propranolol vs. placebo (P < 0.05). Pancreatic polypeptide was greater with phentolamine versus placebo during the euglycemic phase (P < 0.05), and free fatty acids were lower and the glucose infusion rate was higher with propranolol versus placebo during the hypoglycemic phase (P < 0.05 for both). These results indicate that neither physiological α- nor β-adrenergic blockade attenuates transplanted islet responses to hypoglycemia, suggesting sympathetic reinnervation of the islet graft is not necessary for posttransplant glucose counterregulation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whether adrenergic input to islets is necessary for glucose homeostasis in humans is debated. Here, the adrenergic contribution to intrahepatically transplanted islet cell responses to hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes was investigated through α- or β-adrenergic receptor blockade during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic clamps. Neither α- nor β-adrenergic blockage affected the suppression of endogenous insulin or activation of glucagon secretion, suggesting that sympathetic reinnervation of islet grafts is not required for posttransplant defense against hypoglycemia.

Developments in the study of Chinese herbal medicine's assessment index and action mechanism for diabetes mellitus.

In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), based on various pathogenic symptoms and the 'golden chamber' medical text, Huangdi Neijing, diabetes mellitus falls under the category 'collateral disease'. TCM, with its wealth of experience, has been treating diabetes for over two millennia. Different antidiabetic Chinese herbal medicines reduce blood sugar, with their effective ingredients exerting unique advantages. As well as a glucose lowering effect, TCM also regulates bodily functions to prevent diabetes associated complications, with reduced side effects compared to western synthetic drugs. Chinese herbal medicine is usually composed of polysaccharides, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids. These active ingredients reduce blood sugar via various mechanism of actions that include boosting endogenous insulin secretion, enhancing insulin sensitivity and adjusting key enzyme activity and scavenging free radicals. These actions regulate glycolipid metabolism in the body, eventually achieving the goal of normalizing blood glucose. Using different animal models, a number of molecular markers are available for the detection of diabetes induction and the molecular pathology of the disease is becoming clearer. Nonetheless, there is a dearth of scientific data about the pharmacology, dose-effect relationship, and structure-activity relationship of TCM and its constituents. Further research into the efficacy, toxicity and mode of action of TCM, using different metabolic and molecular markers, is key to developing novel TCM antidiabetic formulations.

Biomimetic artificial islet model with vascularized microcapsule structures for durable glycemic control

Islet transplantation is a promising strategy for diabetes mellitus treatment as it can recapitulate endogenous insulin secretion and provide long-term glycemic control. Islet models constructed in biomaterial scaffolds that reproduce biological characteristics of native islets is a feasible option to circumvent the dilemma of donor shortage and the requirement of chronic immunosuppression. Herein, we developed bioinspired artificial microcapsule-based islet models with microvessels for glycemic control using microfluidic electrospray strategy. Microfluidic electrospray can generate uniform hydrogel microcapsules with core-shell structure for encapsulating islet cells. The cell-laden microcapsules enabled the efficient transportation of nutrient, oxygen, and insulin; as well as the incorporation with microvessels for prompting glucose responsiveness and molecular exchange. We demonstrated by in vivo experiments that the blood glucose, food intake, and body weight of diabetic mouse models were alleviated, and the glucose tolerance was promoted after the engraftment of islet microcapsules. We further demonstrated the improved functionality of transplanted islet model in insulin secretion, immune escape, and microcirculation using standard histological and molecular analysis. These results indicated that the microcapsules with microvessels are promising artificial islet models and are valuable for treating diabetes.

Prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes: in search of the ideal combination therapy targeting multiple immunometabolic pathways

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) represents an autoimmune disease caused by the gradual immune-mediated destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells within the pancreatic islets of Langerhans, resulting in the lifelong need for exogenous insulin therapy. According to recent estimates, T1D currently affects about 8.4 million individuals worldwide. Since a definitive biological cure for this disease is not available yet, there is a great need for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at safely and effectively altering the natural history of the disease during its sequential stages. Ideal therapeutic goals in T1D include the prevention of autoimmune beta-cell destruction, the preservation of residual beta-cell mass and endogenous insulin secretion, the replacement and/or regeneration of beta cells, as well as automated insulin delivery through advanced closed-loop artificial pancreas systems. With this regard, an important research area focused on the identification of a definitive biological cure for T1D is represented by the investigation of immunotherapeutic and beta-cell-protective agents used as disease-modifying therapies to forestall or eliminate insulin dependence. In this commentary, we discuss the reasons why the use of combination therapies targeting the multiple immunometabolic dysfunctions associated with T1D (other than beta-cell autoimmunity) is likely to be more effective in preserving beta cell function in individuals at different stages of T1D, as compared to the use of single therapeutic agents.

An in-silico modeling approach to separate exogenous and endogenous plasma insulin appearance, with application to inhaled insulin

The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic model-based approach to separately quantify the exogenous and endogenous contributions to total plasma insulin concentration and to apply it to assess the effects of inhaled-insulin administration on endogenous insulin secretion during a meal test. A three-step dynamic in-silico modeling approach was developed to estimate the two insulin contributions of total plasma insulin in a group of 21 healthy subjects who underwent two equivalent standardized meal tests on separate days, one of which preceded by inhalation of a Technosphere® Insulin dose (22U or 20U). In the 30–120 min test interval, the calculated endogenous insulin component showed a divergence in the time course between the test with and without inhaled insulin. Moreover, the supra-basal area-under-the-curve of endogenous insulin in the test with inhaled insulin was significantly lower than that in the test without (2.1 ± 1.7 × 104 pmol·min/L vs 4.2 ± 1.8 × 104 pmol·min/L, p < 0.01). The percentage of exogenous insulin reaching the plasma, relative to the inhaled dose, was 42 ± 21%. The proposed in-silico approach separates exogenous and endogenous insulin contributions to total plasma insulin, provides individual bioavailability estimates, and can be used to assess the effect of inhaled insulin on endogenous insulin secretion during a meal.

AM Insulinization of the Liver Is an Important Driver of PM Hepatic Glucose Uptake

Glucose tolerance is significantly improved in response to consuming a second, identical meal later in the day. It is known that physiologic (portal vein) exposure to insulin in the morning primes the liver for increased hepatic glucose uptake and glycogen storage in the afternoon. Although this phenomenon has been observed in both healthy and diabetic individuals, it has not yet been established whether or not morning peripheral insulin delivery could bring about the same response. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine how the route of morning insulin delivery impacts the liver’s ability to extract and store glucose later in the day. To explore this aim, we delivered insulin into the portal vein (Po Ins) or a leg vein (Pe Ins) in the morning (AM) and subsequently challenged conscious dogs to a hyperinsulinemic-hyperglycemic (HIHG) clamp in the afternoon (PM). We then assessed the impact that each route of AM insulin delivery had on hepatic glucose uptake (HGU), non-HGU, and glycogen storage in the PM. The insulin infusion rates used in the Po Ins group were selected to mimic the rise in endogenous insulin secretion previously observed during a 4hr AM duodenal glucose infusion (2.1 mU/kg/min [0-30 min], 2.4 mU/kg/min [30-60 min], and 1.5 mU/kg/min [60-240 min]). In efforts to expose both groups to the same amount of insulin in the periphery while creating a difference at the liver, these rates were halved in the Pe Ins group. In the PM clamp, all groups received 4x basal insulin, 2x basal glycemia, and portal glucose infusion to simulate a second meal. During the 2.5hr PM clamp, the mean HGU was 1.8-fold higher in the Po Ins group vs. the Pe Ins group (HGU of 6.28±0.62 vs. 3.49±0.31 mg/kg/min; net AUC of 827±82 vs. 474±40 mg/kg/2.5hr, p&lt;0.002), respectively, with no significant difference in non-HGU (net AUC of 819±118 mg/kg/2.5hr in Po Ins vs. 684±83 mg/kg/2.5hr in Pe Ins). Additionally, mean PM hepatic glycogen content was 47% larger in Po Ins vs. Pe Ins (23.6±1.1 vs. 12.5±1.5 mg/g liver, p&lt;0.001), respectively. When compared to a group from an earlier study that received morning saline and a HIHG clamp in the afternoon (Sal Ctrl), there was no significant difference between Pe Ins and Sal Ctrl for any parameter measured. Therefore, physiologic hepatic insulin exposure in the morning is critical for increased hepatic glucose disposition and glycogen storage later in the day. 5T32DK007563 5R01DK131082-02. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Effect of Immunotherapy on C-peptide Levels in Patients With Type I Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by insulin deficiency resulting from loss of function of beta cells in the pancreas, leading to hyperglycemia and associated long-term systemic complications and even death. Immunotherapy demonstrates beta cell function-preserving potential; however, its impact on C-peptide levels, a definitive biomarker of beta cell function, and endogenous insulin secretion remain unclear. A systematic review of various immunotherapeutic interventions is hence needed for a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness as well as identifying research gaps and influencing future research and clinical decisions. An extensive literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using precise keywords and filters to identify relevant studies. Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility according to predetermined eligibility criteria, and data was extracted. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality and validity of the included studies. A senior reviewer resolved discrepancies and differences of opinion between independent reviewers. A total of 11 studies were included, with 1464 study participants. Both Phase II and III trials were included. Within the included studies, four studies assessed the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab as an intervention. Another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, teplizumab, was assessed as an intervention in four studies, whereas two studies assessed the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab and one study assessed abatacept as its interventional drug. Otelixizumab demonstrated benefits at higher doses but was associated with adverse effects like Ebstein-Barr virus reactivation and cytomegalovirus infection, while at lower doses it failed to show a significant difference in C-peptide levels or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Teplizumab, on the other hand, showed promise in reducing C-peptide loss and exogenous insulin requirements and was associated with adverse events such as rash, lymphopenia, urinary tract infection, and cytokine release syndrome. However, these reactions were only associated with therapy initiation, and they subsided on their own. Rituximab improved C-peptide responses, and abatacept therapy demonstrated reduced loss of C-peptide, improved C-peptide levels, and lowered HbA1c. Teplizumab, rituximab, otelixizumab, and abatacept show potential for preserving beta cell function by reducing C-peptide loss in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. However, careful monitoring of adverse reactions, particularly viral infections and cytokine release syndrome, is necessary for the safe implementation of these therapies.

C-peptide Level in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Oral Anti-diabetic Drugs.

In the development and progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus, β-cell dysfunction occurs after insulin resistance. Despite poor glycaemic control, there is a practice of increasing the dose of oral anti-diabetics or adding more drugs to the regimen due to the common perception that low endogenous insulin secretion is related to type 1 diabetes mellitus only and patient'spoor compliance to injectables. Keeping this perspective in mind, this study was conducted to assess the prevalence of beta cell dysfunction by low serum C-peptide levels and its correlation with poor glycaemic control. A total of 134 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for more than 10 years on oral anti-diabetic drugs fulfilling our eligibility criteria were enrolled in our study. Blood samples for fasting blood sugar and fasting C-peptide level were taken before breakfast and uptake of anti-diabetic drugs. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between fasting C-peptide and glycaemic control with respect to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Of the patients,19.40% had insufficient beta cell reserve serumlevels (C-peptide < 0.5 ng/ml), of which most of the patients (14/26 = 53.85%) had poor glycaemic control (HbA1c < 8.0%). Overall, there was a significant correlation between poor glycaemic control with respect to HbA1c and low serum C-peptide levels (p < 0.05). We found a significant association of beta cell dysfunction (low fasting C-peptide level) with the use of insulin secretagogue. The proportion of patients with C-peptide levels less than 0.5 ng/ml was lower in patients using sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors as compared to insulin secretagogue. SGLT-2 inhibitors should be preferred over other anti-diabetic drugs as an add-on to existing metformin therapy. Insulin requirement must be assessed in patients who have long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Short- and Long-Term Effects on Glucose Control of Nonadherence to Insulin Therapy in People With Type 2 Diabetes An In Silico Study.

Strict adherence to multiple daily insulin (MDI) therapy is a cornerstone for the achievement of good glucose control in people with advanced type 2 diabetes (T2D). Here, we aim to in silico assess glucose control in T2D subjects with poor adherence to MDI therapy. We tuned the Padova T2D Simulator, originally describing early-stage T2D physiology, around advanced T2D people. One hundred in silico advanced T2D subjects were generated and equipped with optimal MDI therapy: specifically, basal and bolus insulin amounts and injection times were individualized for each subject by applying titration algorithms that iteratively update insulin dose based on glucose deviation from its target. Then, the effect of nonadhering to MDI therapy was assessed using standard glucose control metrics calculated in two 6-month 3-meal/day in silico scenarios: in Scenario 1, subjects received the optimal basal and prandial insulin bolus at each meal; in Scenario 2, subjects received optimal basal insulin and randomly delayed or skipped the prandial insulin bolus in 3 lunches during working days and 1 dinner during weekends. A statistically significant degradation was found in all glucose control outcome metrics in Scenario 2 versus Scenario 1: e.g., percent time above 180 mg/dL increased by 22.2% and glucose management index by 0.2%. Impaired adherence to MDI therapy in T2D leads to glucose control deteriorations in both short and long terms. Interestingly, short-term hyperglycemia seems being contrasted by residual endogenous insulin secretion, which statistically increased by 3-fold after delayed/skipped insulin boluses compared with optimal ones.

Clinical Prediction Models Combining Routine Clinical Measures Have High Accuracy in Identifying Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Defined by Maintained Endogenous Insulin Secretion: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

With high prevalence of obesity and overlapping features between diabetes subtypes, accurately classifying youth-onset diabetes can be challenging. We aimed to develop prediction models that, using characteristics available at diabetes diagnosis, can identify youth who will retain endogenous insulin secretion at levels consistent with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We studied 2,966 youth with diabetes in the prospective SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study (diagnosis age ≤19 years) to develop prediction models to identify participants with fasting C-peptide ≥250 pmol/L (≥0.75 ng/mL) after >3 years' (median 74 months) diabetes duration. Models included clinical measures at the baseline visit, at a mean diabetes duration of 11 months (age, BMI, sex, waist circumference, HDL cholesterol), with and without islet autoantibodies (GADA, IA-2A) and a Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score (T1DGRS). Models using routine clinical measures with or without autoantibodies and T1DGRS were highly accurate in identifying participants with C-peptide ≥0.75 ng/mL (17% of participants; 2.3% and 53% of those with and without positive autoantibodies) (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUCROC] 0.95-0.98). In internal validation, optimism was very low, with excellent calibration (slope 0.995-0.999). Models retained high performance for predicting retained C-peptide in older youth with obesity (AUCROC 0.88-0.96) and in subgroups defined by self-reported race/ethnicity (AUCROC 0.88-0.97), autoantibody status (AUCROC 0.87-0.96), and clinically diagnosed diabetes types (AUCROC 0.81-0.92). Prediction models combining routine clinical measures at diabetes diagnosis, with or without islet autoantibodies or T1DGRS, can accurately identify youth with diabetes who maintain endogenous insulin secretion in the range associated with T2D.

Evaluation of endogenous residual insulin secretion by C-peptide measurement

C-peptide measurement allows an estimation of the residual endogenous insulin secretion in diabetic patients. Nowadays plasmatic testing is convenient and unexpensive, but we lack standardized tests. Therefore, there are no official recommendation regarding its use. As an indication, in some circumstances, C-peptide measurement could be used to specify the type of diabetes, help guide the treatment strategy and potentially assess the risk for complications. Its use is still limited and not recommended on a routine base for all patients living with diabetes, but in the future, tests standardization and establishment of reference ranges could give more insight on the clinical relevance of C-peptide measurement.

The role of superfast insulin analogues in diabetes mellitus

In recent decades, significant advances in sugar therapy have been associated with the introduction of human insulin analogues. Superfast human insulin analogues have become an important tool for achieving optimal glycemic control and improving the quality of life of patients. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics, this group of insulin preparations provides a faster and more predictable onset of action, which allows its profile to be as close as possible to the secretion of endogenous insulin. A number of clinical trials have confirmed the advantage of superfast insulin analogues in the control of postprandial hyperglycemia compared with insulin preparations of the previous generation.

Short-term recovery of insulin secretion in response to a meal is associated with future glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients.

Endogenous insulin secretion could be recovered by improving hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the association between short-term recovery of insulin secretion during hospitalization and clinical background or future glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 127 patients with type 2 diabetes were included. The recovery of endogenous insulin secretion was determined using the following indices: index A: fasting C-peptide index (CPI) at discharge - fasting CPI on admission; index B: postprandial CPI at discharge - postprandial CPI on admission; and index C: Δ C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) (postprandial CPR - fasting CPR) at discharge - ΔCPR on admission. We examined the associations of each index with clinical background and future glycemic control measured by glycosylated hemoglobin and continuous glucose monitoring. Using index A and B, the age was significantly younger, whereas BMI and visceral fat area were significantly higher in the high-recovery group than in the low-recovery group. Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin levels were significantly greater at 6 and 12 months in the high-recovery group in the analysis of index C. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the index B and index C as indicators to predict glycosylated hemoglobin <7.0% at 6 months after discharge. Furthermore, index C was positively correlated with the time in the target glucose range, and inversely correlated with the standard deviation of glucose at 3 and 12 months after discharge. Short-term recovery of insulin secretion in response to a meal during hospitalization, evaluated with the index-C, might predict future glycemic control.

Testing a new platform to screen disease-modifying therapy in type 1 diabetes

Studies of new therapies to preserve insulin secretion in early type 1 diabetes require several years to recruit eligible subjects and to see a treatment effect; thus, there is interest in alternative study designs to speed this process. Most people with longstanding type 1 diabetes no longer secrete insulin. However, studies from pancreata of those with longstanding T1D show that beta cells staining for insulin can persist for decades after diagnosis, and this is paralleled in work showing proinsulin secretion in individuals with longstanding disease; collectively this suggests that there is a reserve of alive but “sleeping” beta cells. Here, we designed a novel clinical trial platform to test whether a short course of therapy with an agent known to have effects in type 1 diabetes with residual endogenous insulin could transiently induce insulin secretion in those who no longer produce insulin. A therapy that transiently “wakes up” sleeping beta cells might be tested next in a fully powered trial in those with endogenous insulin secretion. In this three-arm non-randomized pilot study, we tested three therapies known to impact disease: two beta-cell supportive agents, liraglutide and verapamil, and an immunomodulatory agent, golimumab. The golimumab treated arm was not fully enrolled due to uncertainties about immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants had mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT)-stimulated C-peptide below the quantitation limit (&lt;0.02 ng/mL) at enrollment and received 8 to 12 weeks of therapy. At the completion of therapy, none of the individuals achieved the primary outcome of MMTT-stimulated C-peptide ≥ 0.02 ng/mL. An exploratory outcome of the verapamil arm was MRI-assessed pancreas size, diffusion, and longitudinal relaxation time, which showed repeatability of these measures but no treatment effect. The liraglutide and golimumab arms were registered on clinicaltrials.gov under accession number NCT03632759 and the verapamil arm under accession number NCT05847413. Trail registration: Protocols are registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under accession numbers NCT03632759 and NCT05847413.

Transdermal Blood Sampling for C-Peptide Is a Minimally Invasive, Reliable Alternative to Venous Sampling in Children and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

C-peptide and islet autoantibodies are key type 1 diabetes biomarkers, typically requiring venous sampling, which limits their utility. We assessed transdermal capillary blood (TCB) collection as a practical alternative. Ninety-one individuals (71 with type 1 diabetes, 20 control; individuals with type 1 diabetes: aged median 14.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 9.1-17.1], diabetes duration 4.0 years [1.5-7.7]; control individuals: 42.2 years [38.0-52.1]) underwent contemporaneous venous and TCB sampling for measurement of plasma C-peptide. Participants with type 1 diabetes also provided venous serum and plasma, and TCB plasma for measurement of autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase, islet antigen-2, and zinc transporter 8. The ability of TCB plasma to detect significant endogenous insulin secretion (venous C-peptide ≥200 pmol/L) was compared along with agreement in levels, using Bland-Altman. Venous serum was compared with venous and TCB plasma for detection of autoantibodies, using established thresholds. Acceptability was assessed by age-appropriate questionnaire. Transdermal sampling took a mean of 2.35 min (SD 1.49). Median sample volume was 50 µL (IQR 40-50) with 3 of 91 (3.3%) failures, and 13 of 88 (14.7%) <35 µL. TCB C-peptide showed good agreement with venous plasma (mean venous ln[C-peptide] - TCB ln[C-peptide] = 0.008, 95% CI [-0.23, 0.29], with 100% [36 of 36] sensitivity/100% [50 of 50] specificity to detect venous C-peptide ≥200 pmol/L). Where venous serum in multiple autoantibody positive TCB plasma agreed in 22 of 32 (sensitivity 69%), comparative specificity was 35 of 36 (97%). TCB was preferred to venous sampling (type 1 diabetes: 63% vs. 7%; 30% undecided). Transdermal capillary testing for C-peptide is a sensitive, specific, and acceptable alternative to venous sampling; TCB sampling for islet autoantibodies needs further assessment.