Endogenous GH-releasing Hormone Research Articles

Efficacy of a growth hormone-releasing hormone agonist in a murine model of cardiometabolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a major unmet medical need owing to its diverse pathophysiology and lack of effective therapies. Potent synthetic, agonists (MR-356 and MR-409) of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) improve the phenotype of models of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in cardiorenal models of HFpEF. Endogenous GHRH exhibits a broad range of regulatory influences in the cardiovascular (CV) system and aging and plays a role in several cardiometabolic conditions including obesity and diabetes. Whether agonists of GHRH can improve the phenotype of cardiometabolic HFpEF remains untested and unknown. Here we tested the hypothesis that MR-356 can mitigate/reverse the cardiometabolic HFpEF phenotype. C57BL6N mice received a high-fat diet (HFD) plus the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (l-NAME) for 9 wk. After 5 wk of HFD + l-NAME regimen, animals were randomized to receive daily injections of MR-356 or placebo during a 4-wk period. Control animals received no HFD + l-NAME or agonist treatment. Our results showed the unique potential of MR-356 to treat several HFpEF-like features including cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, capillary rarefaction, and pulmonary congestion. MR-356 improved cardiac performance by improving diastolic function, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and exercise capacity. Importantly, the increased expression of cardiac pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) was restored to normal levels suggesting that MR-356 reduced myocardial stress associated with metabolic inflammation in HFpEF. Thus, agonists of GHRH may be an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cardiometabolic HFpEF phenotype.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This randomized study used rigorous hemodynamic tools to test the efficacy of a synthetic GHRH agonist to improve cardiac performance in a cardiometabolic HFpEF. Daily injection of the GHRH agonist, MR-356, reduced the HFpEF-like effects as evidenced by improved diastolic dysfunction, reduced cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and pulmonary congestion. Notably, end-diastolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship were reset to control levels. Moreover, treatment with MR-356 increased exercise capacity and reduced myocardial stress associated with metabolic inflammation in HFpEF.

Structural and Functional Divergence of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptors in Early Sarcopterygians: Lungfish and Xenopus

The evolutionary trajectories of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor remain enigmatic since the discovery of physiologically functional GHRH-GHRH receptor (GHRHR) in non-mammalian vertebrates in 2007. Interestingly, subsequent studies have described the identification of a GHRHR2 in chicken in addition to the GHRHR and the closely related paralogous receptor, PACAP-related peptide (PRP) receptor (PRPR). In this article, we provide information, for the first time, on the GHRHR in sarcopterygian fish and amphibians by the cloning and characterization of GHRHRs from lungfish (P. dolloi ) and X. laevis. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses demonstrated structural resemblance of lungfish GHRHR to their mammalian orthologs, while the X. laevis GHRHR showed the highest homology to GHRHR2 in zebrafish and chicken. Functionally, lungfish GHRHR displayed high affinity towards GHRH in triggering intracellular cAMP and calcium accumulation, while X. laevis GHRHR2 was able to react with both endogenous GHRH and PRP. Tissue distribution analyses showed that both lungfish GHRHR and X. laevis GHRHR2 had the highest expression in brain, and interestingly, X. laevis GHRHR2 also had high abundance in the reproductive organs. These findings, together with previous reports, suggest that early in the Sarcopterygii lineage, GHRHR and PRPR have already established diverged and specific affinities towards their cognate ligands. GHRHR2, which has only been found in xenopus, zebrafish and chicken hitherto, accommodates both GHRH and PRP.

Pharmacological Characteristics of KP-102 (GHRP-2), a Potent Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide

KP-102 (D-alanyl-3-(2-naphthyl)-D-alanyl-L-alanyl-L-tryptophyl-D-phenylalanyl-L-lysinamide dihydrochloride, growth hormone-releasing peptide-2, GHRP-2, pralmorelin, CAS 158861-67-7), is a potent synthetic growth hormone (GH) secretagogue. In the present study, the pharmacological characteristics of the GH-releasing property of KP-102 were investigated by means of in vivo and in vitro experiments. In conscious rats, the GH-releasing activity of KP-102 was more potent than that of exogenously injected GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Under pentobarbital anesthesia in which endogenous somatostatin secretion is known to be decreased, KP-102 and GHRH, both showed an almost equivalent GH-releasing potency, which was also similar to that of KP-102 in conscious rats. Besides, KP-102 showed GH-releasing activity in conscious dogs as well, while GHRH failed to increase serum GH levels in conscious dogs. These findings suggest that the GH-releasing activity of KP-102 was less sensitive to GH suppression by endogenous somatostatin as compared with that of GHRH. The GH-releasing activity of KP-102 was completely absent in hypophysectomized rats, but present in median eminence-lesioned rats in which secreted GH amounts were significantly less than those normal rats, indicating necessity of the median eminence (endogenous GHRH) to exert the full activity of KP-102 in GH stimulation. KP-102 directly stimulated GH secretion from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells, although the GH-releasing potency of KP-102 was significantly weaker than that of GHRH in vitro. In conscious rats, KP-102 stimulated the secretion of both adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone, but not of prolactin. Three weeks administration of KP-102 showed growth-accelerating effect, a slight increase of body weight and wet weight of some organs in both normal and monosodium glutamate (MSG)-treated rats. These results suggest that KP-102 showed specific GH-releasing activity apart from slight ACTH secretion, and that the GH-releasing activity was stable in comparison with that of exogenously injected GHRH.

Localized Suppression of Cortical Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptors State-Specifically Attenuates Electroencephalographic Delta Waves

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) promotes non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS), in part via a well characterized hypothalamic sleep-promoting site. However, GHRH may also act in the cortex to influence sleep. Application of GHRH to the surface of the cortex changes electroencephalographic (EEG) delta power. GHRH and the GHRH receptor (GHRHR) mRNAs are detectable in the rat cortex, and the expression of cortical GHRHR is activity dependent. Here, we microinjected a GHRH antagonist or GHRHR small interfering RNA (siGHRHR) onto the somatosensory cortex surface in rats. The unilateral application of the GHRH antagonist ipsilaterally decreased EEG delta wave power during NREMS, but not wakefulness, during the initial 40 min after injection. Similarly, the injection of siGHRHR reduced cortical expression of GHRHR and suppressed NREMS EEG delta wave power during 20-24 h after injection. Using the fura-2 calcium imaging technique, cultured cortical cells responded to GHRH by increasing intracellular calcium. Approximately 18% of the GHRH-responsive cells were GABAergic as illustrated by glutamic acid decarboxylase-67 (GAD67) immunostaining. Double labeling for GAD67 and GHRHR in vitro and in vivo indicated that only a minority of cortical GHRHR-containing cells were GABAergic. Our data suggest that endogenous cortical GHRH activates local cortical cells to affect EEG delta wave power state-specifically. Results are also consistent with the hypothesis that GHRH contributes to local network state regulation.

The Role of Endogenous Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Acromegaly

The Role of Endogenous Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Acromegaly

Role of endogenous ghrelin in growth hormone secretion, appetite regulation and metabolism

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid hormone that is acylated post-translation, is the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). The highest concentrations of ghrelin are found in the stomach; however ghrelin peptide is also present in hypothalamic nuclei known to be important in the control of GH and feeding behavior. Exogenous ghrelin potently stimulates pituitary GH release through a mechanism that is dependent, in part, on endogenous GH-releasing hormone. Whether endogenous ghrelin plays a role in the control of GH secretion and growth is not clear and ghrelin deficient animals appear to grow normally. In contrast, experimental animal and clinical data suggest that abnormalities in GHS-R signaling could impact growth. Ghrelin or other GHS are clinically useful for GH-testing and limited data suggest that they might be useful in the treatment of some patients with GH deficiency. Substantial data have implicated ghrelin as an important regulator of feeding behavior and energy equilibrium. Ghrelin has a potent orexigenic effect in both animals and humans and this effect is mediated through hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Agouti-related peptide (AgRP). Appetite simulation coupled with other metabolic effects promotes weight gain during chronic treatment with ghrelin. These metabolic effects are in part mediated through an increase in respiratory quotient (VQ). Presence of ghrelin appears to be necessary for the development of obesity in some animal models. Whether abnormalities in ghrelin signaling are involved in human obesity is not yet known.

Ghrelin and sleep-wake regulation

peptides play a key role in the regulation of sleep-wake behavior ([11][1]). There are many hints that also the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue (GHS) receptor ghrelin participates in the regulation of vigilance states. In a previous editorial focus ([10][2]) I wrote that

The Role of Endogenous Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Acromegaly

Some indirect evidence suggests hypothalamic control of GH secretion in acromegaly. The objective of the study is to examine whether GH secretion in acromegaly is dependent on endogenous GHRH. We studied eight patients with untreated acromegaly due to a GH-producing pituitary tumor. All patients received an iv infusion of normal saline for 24 h and GHRH-antagonist (GHRH-ant) at 50 microg/kg x h for 7 d. GH was measured every 10 min for 24 h during the normal saline infusion and on the last day of the GHRH-ant infusion. A group of nine different patients with untreated acromegaly served as the control group and underwent blood sampling for GH every 10 min for two 24-h periods to assess the day-to-day variability of GH secretion. The study was set in a university referral center. Twenty-four-hour mean GH was the main outcome measured. In six of eight subjects treated with GHRH-ant, 24-h mean GH decreased by 5.8-30.0% during iv GHRH-ant and, in three subjects, the change in the 24-h mean GH was greater than the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the spontaneous day-to-day variability of the mean GH in patients with acromegaly. Based on the binomial distribution, the probability of this magnitude of change to occur in three of eight subjects by chance alone is 0.0008. In some patients with acromegaly due to a pituitary adenoma, GH secretion is under partial control by endogenous GHRH.

An essential role for the hematopoietic transcription factor Ikaros in hypothalamic–pituitary-mediated somatic growth

Ikaros transcription factors play critical functions in the control of lymphohematopoiesis and immune regulation. Family members contain multiple zinc fingers that mediate DNA binding and homooligomerization or heterooligomerization. Ikaros is abundantly expressed in pituitary mammosomatotrophs, where it deacetylates histone 3 sites on the proximal growth hormone (GH) promoter to silence gene expression. Ikaros-null mice display stunted growth with reduced circulating levels of the GH target factor insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Ikaros-deficient mice have small anterior pituitary glands with a disproportionately reduced somatotroph population. Systemic administration of GH results in increased IGF-I levels and enhanced somatic growth. In contrast, reconstitution with WT lymphocytes was not sufficient to rescue the stunted growth phenotype of Ikaros-deficient mice. Ikaros was identified in mouse hypothalamic arcuate nuclei, where it colocalized with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH); in contrast, Ikaros-null mice lack GHRH immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus. Overexpression of Ikaros enhanced GHRH promoter activity and induced endogenous GHRH gene expression. These findings unmask a wider role for Ikaros in the neuroendocrine system, highlighting a critical contribution to the development of the hypothalamic-pituitary somatotrophic axis.

Effects of long-term treatment with growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 in the GHRH knockout mouse

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues (GHS) stimulate GH secretion in vivo in humans and in animals. They act on the ghrelin receptor, expressed in both the hypothalamus and the pituitary. It is unknown whether GHSs act predominantly by increasing the release of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or by acting directly on the somatotroph cells. We studied whether a potent GHS could stimulate growth in the absence of endogenous GHRH. To this end, we used GHRH knockout (GHRH-KO) mice. These animals have proportionate dwarfism due to severe GH deficiency (GHD) and pituitary hypoplasia due to reduced somatotroph cell mass. We treated male GHRH-KO mice for 6 wk (from week 1 to week 7 of age) with GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2, 10 microg s.c. twice a day). Chronic treatment with GHRP-2 failed to stimulate somatotroph cell proliferation and GH secretion and to promote longitudinal growth. GHRP-2-treated mice showed an increase in total body weight compared with placebo-treated animals, due to worsening of the body composition alterations typical of GHD animals. These data demonstrate that GHRP-2 failed to reverse the severe GHD caused by lack of GHRH.

Partial Reversibility of Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency in the GH-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) Knockout Mouse by Postnatal Treatment with a GHRH Analog

The proliferation of pituitary somatotroph cells and the synthesis and secretion of GH require the hypothalamic peptide GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Accordingly, we have shown that mice with targeted disruption [knockout (KO)] of the GHRH gene (GHRHKO) have isolated GH deficiency (GHD) and anterior pituitary hypoplasia. The weight of GRHRKO mice is about 60% that of normal mice by 12 wk of age. The phenotype is strikingly similar to that observed in the mouse with mutated GHRH receptor (little). It is not known whether exposure to endogenous GHRH during intrauterine growth is necessary for postnatal GH secretion, and whether GHD due to congenital lack of GHRH activity would be reversible by treatment with GHRH during the postnatal period. To answer this question, we treated GHRHKO mice with a long-acting superactive GHRH analog (JI-38) at two ages: from wk 2-6 (2 microg, twice a day) and from wk 12-16 (4 microg, twice a day). Normal littermates served as controls. At both ages JI-38 caused growth acceleration, increase in size of the pituitary gland, increase in pituitary GH mRNA and GH protein levels and serum GH, and significant increase in liver IGF-I mRNA, although none of these parameters was fully normalized. Our findings demonstrate that GHD and pituitary hypoplasia in GHRHKO mice may be partially reversed by long-term treatment with a GHRH analog, and that somatotroph cells maintain responsiveness to GHRH even if this factor is absent during intrauterine development.

Blockade of endogenous growth hormone-releasing hormone receptors dissociates nocturnal growth hormone secretion and slow-wave sleep

A temporal association between non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stages 3 and 4 and nocturnal augmentation of GH release was found long ago, yet the precise mechanism for this association has not been identified. It has been shown, however that pulsatile GHRH administration increases both slow-wave sleep (SWS) and GH. Based on these data, a role for GHRH as an inducer of SWS was proposed. To test this hypothesis, we have performed the corollary experiment whereby the action of endogenous GHRH has been antagonized. Healthy men (20-33 years old) had an infusion of GHRH antagonist ((N-Ac-Tyr(1), D-Arg(2)) GHRH-29 (NH(2))) or saline for a 12-h period, between 2100 and 0900 h. An i.v. bolus of GHRH was given at 0700 h and GH samples were drawn from 0700 to 0900 h to document the efficacy of GH suppression by the GHRH antagonist. A limited montage sleep study was recorded from 2300 to 0700 h during each admission. Plasma GH concentrations were analyzed by the use of a sensitive chemiluminometric assay. Effectiveness of the GHRH antagonist was validated in all subjects by demonstrating 93+/-1.8% (P=0.012) suppression of GH response to a GHRH bolus. Polysomnography demonstrated that the percentage of SWS was not different when saline and GHRH antagonist nights were compared (P=0.607); other quantifiable sleep parameters were also unchanged. We conclude that endogenous GHRH is indispensable for the nocturnal augmentation of GH secretion, but that it is unlikely to participate in the genesis of SWS.

GHRH and sleep.

A significant portion of the total daily growth hormone (GH) secretion is associated with deep non-REM sleep (NREMS). GH secretion is stimulated by the hypothalamic neurohormone, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Exogenous GHRH promotes NREMS in various species. Suppression of endogenous GHRH (competitive antagonist, antibodies, somatostatinergic stimulation, high doses of GH or insulin-like growth factor) results in simultaneous inhibition of NREMS. Mutant and transgenic animals with a defect in GHRHergic activity display permanently reduced NREMS which cannot be reversed by means of GH supplementation. GHRH contents and mRNA levels in the hypothalamus correlate with sleep-wake activity during the diurnal cycle and sleep deprivation and recovery sleep. Stimulation of NREMS by GHRH is a hypothalamic action. GABAergic neurons in the anterior hypothalamus/preoptic region are candidates for mediating promotion of NREMS by GHRH. In contrast to NREMS, stimulation of REMS by GHRH is mediated by GH. Simultaneous stimulation of NREMS and GH secretion by GHRH may promote adjustment of tissue anabolism to sleep.

Antagonism of endogenous growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) leads to reduced proliferation and apoptosis in MDA231 breast cancer cells.

GHRH, in addition to stimulating the release of growth hormone (GH) from the pituitary, is a trophic factor for pituitary somatotrophs. Growth hormone-releasing hormone is also expressed in the gonads, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, thymus, and lymphocytes, as well as in tumors of the pancreas, lung, central nervous system, and breast. Since GHRH has mitogenic effects, we examined the hypothesis that GHRH is an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in neoplastic breast tissue. The effect of disrupting endogenous GHRH on cell growth and apoptosis of MDA231 cells was examined through the use of a competitive GHRH antagonist, [N-acetyl-Tyr1, D-Arg2] fragment 1-29Amide (GHRHa). Cell proliferation was determined by direct cell counting and tritiated thymidine incorporation. Apoptosis was analyzed by examination of DNA laddering and nuclear condensation. GHRHa resulted in a dose-dependent, transient, and reversible decrease in cell number, proliferation rate, and tritiated thymidine uptake. Conversely, GHRHa led to a marked and dose-dependent increase in both DNA laddering and nuclear condensation. These results indicate that disruption of endogenous GHRH action in MDA231 cells results in both decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis. Taken together, the findings suggest that endogenous GHRH acts as an autocrine/paracrine factor in the regulation of growth of at least some breast cancer cell types.

Growth hormone (GH) rebound rise following somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in dogs with the use of GH-releasing hormone and a GH-releasing peptide.

Evidence has been presented that in both animals and humans the rebound secretion of growth hormone (GH) following withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (SS) is due to the functional activation of the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons of the recipient organism. Based on this premise, this study has sought to assess the existence of functional interactions between endogenous GHRH released by a SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) and growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs), a class of compounds allegedly acting via GHRH. Five young dogs (3 to 4 years old, 2 male and 3 female) were administered, on different occasions, three consecutive intravenous boli of physiological saline (0.1 ml/kg), or GHRH (2 microg/kg), or EP92632 (125 microg/kg), a GHRP compound, or GHRH plus EP92632 at the end of three cycles of 1-h SS infusions (8 microg/(kg x h)) or during a 6-h infusion of saline. Under saline infusion (SALI), plasma GH levels were unaltered, whereas each SSIW cycle was followed by similar GH secretory episodes. Administration of the first GHRH bolus under SALI induced a rise in plasma GH concentrations slightly higher than that induced by the first cycle of SSIW, but the GH response to the second and third GHRH boli was similar to that after SSIW. Following SSIW, the response to the first bolus of GHRH was higher than that during SALI, but the second and third cycles of SSIW induced GH responses similar to those evoked by the GHRH bolus. During SALI, administration of the first bolus of EP92632 induced a rise in plasma GH which was higher than that induced by the first GHRH bolus, the second bolus elicited a GH peak of lesser amplitude and there was a partial restoration of the GH response to the third peptide bolus. SSIW strikingly enhanced the GH release to the first EP92632 bolus, a pattern also present, although to a lesser extent, with the second and third cycles of SSIW. Under SALI, combined administration of GHRH and EP92632 had a synergistic effect on GH release, but a progressive reduction was present in the GH response to the second and third GHRH plus EP92632 boli. SSIW increased only weakly the GH response to the first co-administration of the peptides over that present after administration of EP92632 alone, and did not induce a GH response higher than that present during SALI when the second bolus of the peptides was administered; after the third SSIW a GH rise higher than that present during SALI was elicited by the combined administration of the peptides. (i) the uniformity of the GH rebound responses to multiple cycles of SSIW may indicate that the latter activate a physiological mechanism which mimics that normally controlling GH pulse generation; (ii) EP92632 elicits, under our experimental conditions, a plasma GH rise higher than that induced by GHRH; (iii) SSIW enhances the GH response to EP92639 alone, to an extent reminiscent of that following combined administration of GHRH and EP92632. This pattern reinforces the view that SSIW elicits release of endogenous GHRH, and infers that the GHRP challenge after SSIW may be exploited in humans to distinguish between healthy and GH-deficient adults.

Differential GH-releasing hormone regulation of GHRH receptor mRNA expression in the rat pituitary.

To understand the capacity of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) to regulate expression of the GHRH receptor, we studied the effects of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression in immature and adult rats by use of pituitary cell culture and immunoneutralization approaches. Pituitary cell cultures from neonatal (2-day-old) and adult (70-day-old) rats were treated with GHRH for 4, 24, or 72 h. The effect of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression depended on the duration of GHRH exposure in both age groups; short-term (4 h) GHRH treatment significantly reduced GHRH receptor mRNA expression (P < 0.05), whereas intermediate treatment (24 h) restored GHRH receptor mRNA to basal levels, and long-term treatment (72 h) stimulated GHRH receptor mRNA expression (P < 0.02). The long-term stimulatory effect of GHRH on GHRH receptor mRNA expression required the presence of serum in the culture medium, and, in the absence of serum, the stimulatory effect was completely abolished. Moreover, the capacity of the pituitary to increase GHRH receptor mRNA expression in response to 72-h GHRH treatment was age dependent, with neonatal pituitaries exhibiting a much greater stimulatory effect than adult pituitaries (P < 0.025). Immunoneutralization of endogenous GHRH significantly reduced GHRH receptor mRNA expression in neonatal (P < 0.004), juvenile (P < 0.003), and mature (P < 0.004) pituitaries compared with age-matched controls. Taken together, these results indicate that GHRH is a potent regulator of GHRH receptor gene expression in immature and mature pituitaries; however, the nature and direction of GHRH regulation of its receptor depend significantly on several variables, including the duration of GHRH exposure, the presence of permissive components in serum, and the developmental stage of the pituitary.

The growth hormone (GH)-axis of GH receptor/binding protein gene-disrupted and metallothionein-human GH-releasing hormone transgenic mice: hypothalamic neuropeptide and pituitary receptor expression in the absence and presence of GH feedback.

Elevation of circulating GH acts to feed back at the level of the hypothalamus to decrease GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and increase somatostatin (SRIF) production. In the rat, GH-induced changes in GHRH and SRIF expression are associated with changes in pituitary GHRH receptor (GHRH-R), GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), and SRIF receptor subtype messenger RNA (mRNA) levels. These observations suggest that GH regulates its own synthesis and release not only by altering expression of key hypothalamic neuropeptides but also by modulating the sensitivity of the pituitary to hypothalamic input, by regulating pituitary receptor synthesis. To further explore this possibility, we examined the relationship between the expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides [GHRH, SRIF, and neuropeptide Y (NPY)] and pituitary receptors [GHRH-R, GHS-R, and SRIF receptor subtypes (sst2 and sst5)] in two mouse strains with alterations in the GH-axis; the GH receptor/binding protein gene-disrupted mouse (GHR/BP-/-) and the metallothionein promoter driven human GHRH (MT-hGHRH) transgenic mouse. In GHR/BP-/- mice, serum insulin-like growth factor I levels are low, and circulating GH is elevated because of the lack of GH negative feedback. Hypothalamic GHRH mRNA levels in GHR/BP-/- mice were 232 +/- 20% of GHR/BP+/+ littermates (P < 0.01), whereas SRIF and NPY mRNA levels were reduced to 86 +/- 2% and 52 +/- 3% of controls, respectively (P < 0.05; ribonuclease protection assay). Pituitary GHRH-R and GHS-R mRNA levels of GHR/BP-/- mice were elevated to 275 +/- 55% and 319 +/- 68% of GHR/BP+/+ values (P < 0.05, respectively), whereas the sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels did not differ from GHR/BP intact controls as determined by multiplex RT-PCR. Therefore, in the absence of GH negative feedback, both hypothalamic and pituitary expression is altered to favor stimulation of GH synthesis and release. In MT-hGHRH mice, ectopic hGHRH transgene expression elevates circulating GH and insulin-like growth factor I. In this model of GH excess, endogenous (mouse) hypothalamic GHRH mRNA levels were reduced to 69 +/- 6% of nontransgenic controls, whereas SRIF mRNA levels were increased to 128 +/- 6% (P < 0.01). NPY mRNA levels were not significantly affected by hGHRH transgene expression. Also, MT-hGHRH pituitary GHRH-R and GHS-R mRNA levels did not differ from controls. However, sst2 and sst5 mRNA levels in MT-hGHRH mice were increased to 147 +/- 18% and 143 +/- 16% of normal values, respectively (P < 0.05). Therefore, in the presence of GH negative feedback, both hypothalamic and pituitary expression is altered to favor suppression of GH synthesis and release.

Induction of growth hormone (GH) mRNA by pulsatile GH-releasing hormone in rats is pattern specific.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a main inducer of growth hormone (GH) pulses in most species studied to date. There is no information regarding the pattern of GHRH secretion as a regulator of GH gene expression. We investigated the roles of the parameters of exogenous GHRH administration (frequency, amplitude, and total amount) upon induction of pituitary GH mRNA, GH content, and somatic growth in the female rat. Continuous GHRH infusions were ineffective in altering GH mRNA levels, GH stores, or weight gain. Changing GHRH pulse amplitude between 4, 8, and 16 microg/kg at a constant frequency (Q3.0 h) was only moderately effective in augmenting GH mRNA levels, whereas the 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg dosages stimulated weight gain by as much as 60%. When given at a 1.5-h frequency, GHRH doubled the amount of GH mRNA, elevated pituitary GH stores, and stimulated body weight gain. In the rat model, pulsatile but not continuous GHRH administration is effective in inducing pituitary GH mRNA and GH content as well as somatic growth. These studies suggest that the greater growth rate, pituitary mRNA levels, and GH stores seen in male compared with female rats are likely mediated, in part, by the endogenous episodic GHRH secretory pattern present in males.

Regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion by different glutamate receptor subtypes in the rat.

It has been firmly established that excitatory amino acids (EAAs), such as glutamate, are pivotal elements in the hypothalamic circuitry involved in the control of pituitary function. The actions of EAAs are mediated by different postsynaptic receptor subtypes, which include N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA), kainate (KA), 2-amino-3-hydroxy-5 methyl-4-isoxazol propionic acid (AMPA) and metabotropic receptors. In this review, we summarize our experimental work on the role of EAA neurotransmission in the control of GH secretion in the rat. Detailed characterization of the effects of agonists and antagonists of glutamate receptors on GH release revealed that activation of NMDA, KA and AMPA receptors at different age-points resulted in clear-cut stimulation of GH secretion, although age- and sex-dependent differences were detected in the pattern of response to the different agonists. This stimulatory action was proven nitric oxide (NO)-dependent and not exerted at the pituitary level. In addition, evaluation of the role of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in the stimulatory action of NMDA by means of immunoneutralization of endogenous GHRH or destruction of GHRH producing neurons suggested the involvement of signals other than GHRH in this response. Further, evidence was obtained on the modulation of the EAA system by gonadal factors, and on the physiological relevance of EAA pathways in the regulation of pulsatile GH release. In conclusion, our data using the rat as animal model provide evidence for a pivotal role of glutamate pathways in the regulation of GH secretion throughout the life-span.

Effects of galanin on growtn hormone and prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa

Galanin (GAL) elicits growth hormone (GH) release in normal subjects through interaction with hypothalamic somatostatin. GAL also stimulates GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in vitro. In rats, GAL is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, but this effect is not clear in humans. We have thus investigated GAL effects on GH and PRL release in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), known to have altered regulation of the GH-insulin-like growth factor axis and PRL dynamics, and compared the effects of GHRH and GAL on GH and PRL secretion in AN and normal healthy subjects. Eight women with AN (15 to 27 years; body mass index [BMI], 17 to 19.5 kg/m2) were treated with (1) GHRH 50 microg intravenous (IV) injection, (2) porcine GAL 500 microg infusion from -10 to +30 minutes, and (3) 135-minutes saline infusion as a control, respectively. Both peptides induced a significant increase in plasma GH in AN patients (peak level, 27.41 +/- 5.50 microg/L after GAL and 18.97 +/- 2.67 microg/L after GHRH). When data for AN patients and the control group were compared, GH peak levels after GAL were significantly higher in AN patients (27.41 +/- 5.50 v 13.64 +/- 2.32 microg/L), while GH peak levels after GHRH were not different between the 2 groups (18.97 +/- 2.67 v 15.98 +/- 3.88 microg/L). PRL levels significantly increased after both GHRH (peak, 11.70 +/- 2.80 microg/L) and GAL (peak, 18.02 +/- 5.10 microg/L) treatment in AN patients, but not in normal subjects. We conclude that GAL stimulates exaggerated GH release in AN patients as compared with normal controls, suggesting a dual hypothalamic interaction via both an increase in endogenous GHRH and a decrease in somatostatin secretion. Finally, GAL may act as a PRL secretagogue in AN patients.