End Of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome Associated With Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction.

The characteristics and clinical outcomes associated with sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF) in Japanese acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients remain unknown.Methods and Results: Consecutive AMI patients (n=1,941) transferred to the Hirosaki University Hospital and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 12 h of onset were retrospectively studied. The incidence of VT/VF during hospitalization was 8.3%, and 75% of cases occurred by the end of PCI. Independent predictors associated with VT/VF occurrence by the end of PCI and after PCI, respectively, were identified. Additionally, the differences between patients with VT and VF were examined, which revealed that the characteristics of patients and predictors for VT and VF were clearly different. Additionally, the QRS duration during VT was measured, which demonstrated the possible involvement of Purkinje fibers for VT in the acute phase of AMI. Of the patients with VT/VF, 12% required ECMO support due to refractory VT/VF despite intravenous antiarrhythmic agents such as β-blockers, amiodarone, and nifekalant. Among the patients discharged alive, 1,690 were followed up for a mean of 3.7 years. VT/VF occurrence during hospitalization did not affect the mid-term clinical outcomes even in patients with VT. The results clearly indicated that VT/VF is still a serious complications of AMI. We need to identify patients at high risk of developing VT/VF for careful observation and appropriate intervention.

STEMI patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for a culprit lesion with coronary artery bifurcation-efficacy and safety of the jailed semi-inflated balloon.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 'jailed semi-inflated balloon technique' (JSIBT) for side branch (SB) protection in STEMI patients with a culprit lesion involving a coronary artery bifurcation while undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We treated between Jan, 2011 and Jun, 2020, a total of 264 STEMI patients with a culprit lesion that involved a coronary artery bifurcation using primary PCI. In 30 patients, SB was protected by JSIBT (the JSIBT group). In 234 patients, SB was either protected or not protected by a placed wire (the non-JSIBT group). In both groups, after PCI procedure, TIMI flows of main vessel (MV) and SB were increased significantly compared with their measurements before the procedure. TIMI flows of post-procedural MV were similar between the two groups. In the JSIBT group, TIMI flows of SB both peri-procedure and post-procedure measurements were significantly greater than the non-JSIBT group. Despite a higher incidence of SB dissection in the JSIBT group, no inter-group difference was found in their total SB complications (like SB dissection, SB occlusion, wire entrapment or balloon rupture/entrapment). While JSIBT was an independent predictor for the SB TIMI 3 flow measured at the end of primary PCI, it was not an independent predictor for SB complications. The use of JSIBT as a method of SB protection during primary PCI not only provided better SB protection, but it also had a similar rate of SB complications compared with those with or without prior application of SB wire. This technique may be an effective method of protecting SB for STEMI patients involving coronary artery bifurcation and underwent emergent PCI.

Cardioprotective Effects of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: We assessed the potential efficacy of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: Seventy STEMI patients who presented ≤12 hours after the onset of symptoms and were scheduled for PPCI were randomly assigned to the standard treatments plus CoQ10 or placebo. In the intervention group, CoQ10, as an oral capsule at a dose of 400 mg, was loaded immediately before PPCI and continued at 200 mg twice daily for 28 days. The control group received a matching placebo, similarly. The study endpoints were the proportion of patients with complete myocardial reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow and myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 at the end of PPCI, the proportion of patients with complete ST-segment elevation resolution (≥70%) assessed 60 minutes after PPCI, the plasma levels of creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzyme (CK-MB) and troponin I (TnI) at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after PPCI, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at day 28. Results: The study groups were comparable regarding baseline clinical and procedural characteristics. The proportion of patients with TIMI flow grade 3, MBG 3, and complete ST resolution after completion of PPCI was similar between the groups. Whereas at all-time points after PPCI (12, 24, 48, and 72 hours), the plasma levels of CK-MB and TnI were significantly lower in the CoQ10 group than in the control group. Further, at day 28, CoQ10-treated patients exhibited better LVEF than placebo-treated patients, and the proportion of patients with LVEF less than 50% was lower in the intervention group than in the control group. Conclusion: Our study provided evidence that CoQ10 supplementation might reduce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after PPCI and help to preserve left ventricular function. However, further studies are required to validate these results.

Comparison of intra-procedural vs. post-stenting prolonged bivalirudin infusion for residual thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing: the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and angioX) OCT study.

To compare prolonged bivalirudin infusion vs. an intra-procedural only bivalirudin infusion administration in subjects with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regarding residual stent strut thrombosis. Multivessel STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and scheduled for a staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before hospital discharge were selected among those allocated to either prolonged bivalirudin or intra-procedural only bivalirudin infusion in the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and angioX) Treatment-Duration study. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the infarct-related artery was performed at the end of PPCI and 4-5 days thereafter during staged intervention. The predefined endpoint was the percentage difference in the number of stent cross-sections with a thrombotic area >5% at the end of PPCI and at the time of staged PCI (ΔThCS). Between September 2013 and November 2015, 137 were randomized to either intra-procedural only bivalirudin infusion (N = 64) or prolonged bivalirudin (N = 73) at 16 European sites. Mean stent area, minimum lumen area, percentage of malapposed struts, and mean percent thrombotic area were comparable after index or staged PCI. The difference in the proportion of frames with percent thrombotic area >5% (ΔTh > 5%) were -7.7 (-22.1 to 5.1) in the intra-procedural bivalirudin infusion group and -8.8 (-23.1 to 2.6) in the prolonged infusion group (P = 0.994). Time from index to follow-up OCT imaging and the infarct vessel artery did not affect this OCT-based endpoint. A strategy of prolonged bivalirudin infusion after PPCI did not reduce residual stent strut thrombosis when compared with intra-procedural only bivalirudin infusion administration (funded by The Medicines Company and Terumo; MATRIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01433627).

Risk assessment model for predicting ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) is a kind of malignant arrhythmia in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, there are no risk assessment tools to anticipate the occurrence of VT/VF.This study is to build a risk assessment model to predict the possibility of VT/VF onset in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the patients who underwent PPCI from January 2006 to May 2015. Subjects were divided into VT/VF group and no VT/VF group based on whether VT/VF had occurred or not. In addition, the VT/VF group was further separated into early-onset group (from the time that symptoms began to before the end of PPCI) and late-onset group (after the end of PPCI) based on the timing of when VT/VF happened. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out to distinguish the independent risk factors of VT/VF and an additional statistical method was executed to build the risk assessment model.A total of 607 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 67 cases (11%) experienced VT/VF. In addition, 91% (61) of patients experienced VT/VF within 48 h from the time that the symptoms emerged. Independent risk factors include: age, diabetes mellitus, heart rate, ST-segment maximum elevation, ST-segment total elevation, serum potassium, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), culprit artery was right coronary artery, left main (LM) stenosis, Killip class > I class, and pre-procedure thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow zero grade. Risk score model and risk rank model have been established to evaluate the possibility of VT/VF. Class I: ≤ 4 points; Class II: > 4 points, ≤ 5.5 points; Class III: > 5.5 points, < 6.5 points; and Class IV ≥ 6.5 points. The higher the class, the higher the risk.The incidence of VT/VF in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI is 11% and it occurs more frequently from the time that symptoms begin to before the end of PPCI, which, in most cases, occurs within 48 h of the event. Our risk assessment model could predict the possible occurrence of VT/VF.

Abstract 16906: Cangrelor versus Standard Therapy in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infraction

Introduction: ST-segment myocardial infraction (STEMI) is associated with intense platelet (PLT) activation resulting in microvascular obstruction, inflammation and myocardial damage. Hypothesis: The impact of intense PLT inhibition with cangrelor during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in STEMI patients on PLT mediated inflammatory response has not been studied. Methods: We randomized 20 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI and who received aspirin + ticagrelor to receive intravenous cangrelor (n=11) or placebo (n=9) prior to PPCI. PLT reactivity units (PRU) were evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization), 10 minutes after initiating therapy and at the end of PPCI. Circulating inflammatory cells and PLT-inflammatory cell aggregates (cells/μl of peripheral blood) were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results: Compared to placebo, cangrelor significantly reduced PRU starting 10 minutes after administration. Cangrelor significantly reduced classical (inflammatory) monocytes: CD14++/CD16- (1193 ± 205.7 vs. 2024 ± 312.8; p&lt;0.05), classical monocyte-PLT aggregates: CD14++/CD16-/ CD42+ (334.1 ± 50.35 vs. 580.6 ± 112.2; p&lt;0.05), granulocytes (11040 ± 1545 vs. 24991 ± 7511; p&lt;0.05), and granulocytes-PLT aggregates (1646 ± 203.1 vs. 3949 ± 985.1; p&lt;0.05) compared to the control group ( Figure ). Cangrelor was associated with a trend towards a reduction in cardiac enzyme and inflammatory cytokine levels. Conclusion: Adding Cangrelor to standard antiplatelets in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI provided more intense platelet inhibition and reduced inflammation. This strategy may result in less myocardial damage. The clinical impact of intense platelet inhibition is currently being evaluated in our full cohort (NCT0304327).

Cutoff Value of Admission N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Which Predicts Poor Myocardial Perfusion after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

We explored the value of admission levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTProBNP) that best predicts poor myocardial tissue perfusion following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients admitted with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We enrolled 90 consecutive patients admitted with acute STEMI who underwent PPCI and achieved post-procedural TIMI flow grade 3 in the infarct-related artery. We measured levels of NTProBNP from admission blood samples. Thereafter, we assessed post-procedural myocardial blush grade (MBG) at the end of PPCI, and further measured ST segment resolution (STR) 90 minutes following PPCI. The primary endpoint was STR < 50%; furthermore, the co-primary angiographic endpoint was postprocedural MBG 0/1. The mean age of study subjects was 53.6 ± 10.9 years (74.4% males). We found that NTProBNP was higher in patients with STR < 50% versus those with STR ≥ 50% (p < 0.001), and in patients with post-procedural MBG 0/1 versus those with MBG 2/3 (p < 0.001). A value of NTProBNP ≥ 420 ng/L was the optimal cutoff value that best predicted < 50% STR; it predicted < 50% STR with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 98.4%, 92.3%, 96.9%, and 96%, respectively. Likewise, a value of NTProBNP ≥ 570 ng/L was the optimal cutoff value that best predicted postprocedural MBG 0/1; it predicted MBG 0/1 with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 92.2%, 66.7%, 78.3%, and 86.7%, respectively. In patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI and ended up with successful recanalization of the epicardial infarct-related artery, elevated admission levels of NTProBNP predicted incomplete post-procedural STR with good sensitivity and specificity, and predicted poor post-procedural myocardial blush with good sensitivity and moderate specificity.

Sevoflurane in acute myocardial infarction: A pilot randomized study

Experimental evidence suggests that the inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane has a cardioprotective effect. Our objective was to determine if sedation with sevoflurane will reduce infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) who are treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We randomized 50 patients presenting with a first acute ST-elevation MI treated by primary PCI within 6 hours from symptom onset to sedation with sevoflurane inhalation or standard sedation (control). Coronary flow at the end of PCI was assessed by corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count. Myocardial reperfusion was assessed by ST-segment resolution 60 minutes post-PCI. Infarct size was assessed by release of creatinine kinase (CK) and troponin T. There was no difference in the primary end point: troponin T or CK release adjusted to the area at risk, between groups. However, among patients with anterior MI, there was a trend toward lower CK (P = .05) and nonsignificant decrease in troponin (P = .11) levels in the sevoflurane group. Corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count was 12.3 ± 1.5 in the sevoflurane group and 15.6 ± 9.1 in the control group (P = .16). There was more ST resolution in patients treated by sevoflurane 80.7% ± 25.8% versus 56.6% ± 35.7% (P = .01). Sevoflurane had no significant adverse effect during administration. Sevoflurane administration during primary PCI did not reduce infarct size. There was a trend toward a reduction in infarct size among patients with anterior MI. Sevoflurane administration was associated with improvement in ST-segment resolution.

A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).BackgroundNo-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI.MethodsThis was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk.ResultsOf 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031].ConclusionsIn high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573)

Association Between Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events and Adverse Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (a Harmonizing Outcomes With RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI] Substudy)

The present study sought to determine the extent to which adverse angiographic events encountered during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with STEMI represent a cohort at particularly high risk of intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTEs). The overall frequency and implications of IPTEs occurring in patients with STEMI have not been systematically quantified in previous studies. A total of 3,163 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation for STEMI in the Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial underwent detailed frame-by-frame core laboratory angiographic analysis to assess IPTEs. The clinical outcomes at 30 days were compared between the patients with and without IPTEs. IPTEs, defined as the development of new or increasing thrombus, abrupt vessel closure, no reflow, slow reflow, and distal embolization at any point during the procedure, occurred in 386 patients (12.2%). The independent predictors of IPTE were thrombus at baseline, lesion length, and randomization to bivalirudin; the patients with IPTEs were also more likely to receive bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and unplanned thrombectomy. Compared with patients without IPTEs, the patients with IPTEs had higher 30-day rates of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, ischemic target vessel revascularization, and stroke; 7.8% vs 4.2%, p = 0.002), major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (11.8% vs 6.5%, p <0.001), and all-cause death (4.2% vs 1.8%, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, IPTEs were independently associated with 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and death. In conclusion, the development of IPTEs in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI was associated with subsequent adverse outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and death. Additional studies of strategies to decrease the occurrence of IPTEs are warranted.

New Method of Intracoronary Adenosine Injection to Prevent Microvascular Reperfusion Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The aim of our study was to examine the role of a new, simple protocol of intracoronary adenosine administration performed during primary angioplasty on the immediate angiographic results and clinical course. A prospective, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients (64 ± 14 years, 54 men) with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted. Patients were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 35) received intracoronary adenosine (1 to 2 mg) with a hand injection through the guiding catheter 2 times: immediately after crossing the lesion of the infarct-related artery with guidewire and then after the first balloon inflation. Group 2 (n = 35) received placebo. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after PCI in 32 patients (91.4%) in the adenosine group and 27 patients (77.1%) in the placebo group (p = 0.059). Myocardial blush grade 3 was observed at the end of PCI in 23 patients (65.7%) in the adenosine group and 13 (37.1%) in the placebo group (p < 0.05). Resolution of ST-segment elevation (> 50%) was more frequently observed in the adenosine than in the placebo group: 27 (77%) versus 15 (43%), respectively (p < 0.01). In conclusion, intracoronary adenosine administration improved the angiographic and electrocardiographic results in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing PCI. Adenosine administration seemed to be associated with a more favorable clinical course.

Prediction of 1-Year Mortality With Different Measures of ST-Segment Recovery in All-Comers After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Post hoc analyses from several randomized, controlled trials have established the prognostic importance of different measures of ST-segment recovery in highly selected patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this single-center registry, we investigated whether various measures of ST-segment recovery can be applied to unselected STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. We analyzed 12-lead ECGs from 2124 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI at our institution between November 1, 2000, and January 1, 2007. ECGs were recorded at the catheterization laboratory immediately before arterial puncture and at the end of PCI. We examined measures assessing ST-segment recovery on the postprocedural ECG and measures comparing both ECGs and related these to 1-year, all-cause mortality. Cumulative ST-segment recovery (∑ST-D resolution) at a 50% cutoff had the highest unadjusted accuracy (C statistic, 0.646; 95% confidence interval, 0.602 to 0.689; P<0.001) as compared with the other 8 measures evaluated. Furthermore, ∑ST-D resolution was the strongest contributor to both the net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement. Although each measure of ST-segment recovery provided univariable prognostic information, the ∑ST-D resolution measure comparing summed ST-segment deviations on the preprocedural and postprocedural ECG was the best independent predictor of 1-year mortality in all-comer STEMI patients after primary PCI.

Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of ST-Segment Recovery After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Important determinants of incomplete ST-segment recovery in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been incompletely characterized. Early risk stratification could identify patients with STEMI and incomplete ST-segment recovery who may benefit from adjunctive therapy. For the present study, we analyzed 12-lead electrocardiograms from 2,124 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI at our institution from 2000 to 2007. ST-segment recovery was defined as percent change in cumulative ST-segment deviation between preprocedural and immediately postprocedural electrocardiograms and categorized as incomplete when <50%. A total of 1,032 patients (49%) had incomplete ST-segment recovery. After multivariable adjustment, age >60 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.54, p = 0.011), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.82, p = 0.034), left anterior descending coronary artery-related STEMI (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.30, p<0.001), and multivessel disease (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.63, p = 0.004) were independent predictors of incomplete ST-segment recovery. Current smoking (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.95, p = 0.013) and a preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade <3 flow (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.93, p = 0.014) were inversely related to ST-segment recovery. Incomplete ST-segment recovery was a strong predictor of long-term mortality (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.69, p <0.001) in addition to identified characteristics that independently predicted incomplete ST-segment recovery. In conclusion, incomplete ST-segment recovery at the end of PCI occurred significantly more often in the presence of an age >60 years, nonsmoking, diabetes mellitus, left anterior descending coronary artery-related STEMI, multivessel disease, and preprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow. Patients with STEMI and these clinical features are at increased risk of impaired myocardial salvage and are appropriate candidates for adjunctive therapy.

Comparison of the Usefulness of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide to Other Serum Biomarkers as an Early Predictor of ST-Segment Recovery After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Data on the ability of serum biomarkers to predict microvascular obstruction by ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely absent. Therefore, we determined the association between 5 serum biomarkers, obtained before emergency coronary angiography, and immediate ST-segment recovery in patients who had undergone primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We measured N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), cardiac troponin T, creatinine kinase-MB fraction, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and serum creatinine from blood samples obtained through the arterial sheath at the start of primary PCI. Serial 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded in the catheterization laboratory before arterial puncture and at the end of the PCI. ST-segment recovery was defined as incomplete if <50%. Of 662 included patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 338 (51%) had incomplete ST-segment recovery. An elevated NT-pro-BNP level (> or = 608 ng/L) was the strongest predictor of incomplete ST-segment recovery (adjusted odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 4.1; p <0.001) compared to other serum biomarkers and clinical predictors. An elevated NT-pro-BNP level was more strongly predictive in patients without a history of coronary artery disease or hypertension (adjusted odds ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 2.4 to 9.2; p <0.001). NT-pro-BNP was the best contributor to both net reclassification (0.43; p <0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.04; p <0.001) when added to a multivariate model with clinical predictors of incomplete ST-segment recovery. In conclusion, NT-pro-BNP was the strongest independent predictor of ST-segment recovery at the end of primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to the other serum biomarkers reflecting myocardial cell damage, renal function, and inflammation.

Effect of Clopidogrel Pretreatment on Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

Pretreatment with clopidogrel before elective primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to reduce ischemic complications. There are limited data about the value of clopidogrel pretreatment in the setting of PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to examine the effect of clopidogrel preloading on angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI who were treated with PCI. We conducted a prospective registry of all patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI from March 2003 to June 2006. Excluded were patients with cardiogenic shock. For the current analysis, patients (n = 292) were allocated into 2 groups. One group received clopidogrel loading dose before PCI (in the emergency department or coronary care unit, n = 165); the other,immediately after PCI (n = 127). TIMI myocardial perfusion (TMP) grade at the end of PCI and 30-day and 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed. Clinical characteristics were similar among the groups. However, patients pretreated with clopidogrel were more likely to receive aspirin and beta blockers before the current admission. TMP grade 3 occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the clopidogrel pretreatment group than in the no-pretreatment group (85% vs 71%, p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that clopidogrel pretreatment was associated with an odds ratio of 2.2 for TMP grade 3 (1.2 to 3.9, p = 0.01). Furthermore, the incidence of reinfarction at 30 days was lower in the pretreatment group (0% vs 3.2%, respectively, p = 0.04). In conclusion, these findings support the early use of clopidogrel in patients with STEMI who are treated with primary PCI.