End-expiratory Occlusion Test Research Articles

Feasibility of Fluid Responsiveness Assessment in Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure.

Background: Effective fluid management is important for patients at risk of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Maintaining constant cerebral perfusion represents a challenge, as both hypovolemia and fluid overload can severely impact patient outcomes. Fluid responsiveness tests, commonly used in critical care settings, are often deemed potentially hazardous for these patients due to the risk of disrupting cerebral perfusion. Methods: This single-center, prospective, clinical observational study enrolled 40 patients at risk for increased ICP, including those with acute brain injury. Informed consent was obtained from each participant or their legal guardians before inclusion. The study focused on the dynamics of ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) changes during the Passive Leg Raise Test (PLRT) and the End-Expiratory Occlusion Test (EEOT). Results: The results demonstrated that PLRT and EEOT caused minor and transient increases in ICP, while consistently maintaining stable CPP. EEOT induced significantly lower ICP elevations, making it particularly suitable for use in high-risk situations. Conclusions: PLRT and EEOT can be considered feasible and safe for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients at risk for increased ICP. Notably, EEOT stands out as a preferred method for high-risk patients, offering a dependable strategy for fluid management without compromising cerebral hemodynamics.

Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionPrediction of fluid responsiveness in acutely ill patients might be influenced by a number of clinical and technical factors. We aim to identify variables potentially modifying the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors commonly used in clinical practice.MethodsA sensitive strategy was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases to search for prospective studies assessing the operative performance of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raising (PLR), end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), mini-fluid challenge, and tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill and acutely ill surgical patients published between January 1999 and February 2023. Adjusted diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated by subgroup analyses (inverse variance method) and meta-regression (test of moderators). Variables potentially modifying the operative performance of such predictor tests were classified as technical and clinical.ResultsA total of 149 studies were included in the analysis. The volume used during fluid loading, the method used to assess variations in macrovascular flow (cardiac output, stroke volume, aortic blood flow, volume‒time integral, etc.) in response to PLR/EEOT, and the apneic time selected during the EEOT were identified as technical variables modifying the operative performance of such fluid responsiveness predictor tests (p < 0.05 for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). In addition, the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors was also influenced by clinical variables such as the positive end-expiratory pressure (in the case of EEOT) and the dose of norepinephrine used during the fluid responsiveness assessment for PLR and EEOT (for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs).ConclusionPrediction of fluid responsiveness in critically and acutely ill patients is strongly influenced by a number of technical and clinical aspects. Such factors should be considered for individual intervention decisions.

The use of end-expiratory occlusion test vs. inferior vena cava respiratory variation for the prediction of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: A comparative study

ABSTRACT Sepsis being a chief prominent fatal condition in critically ill patients. In septic-shocked patients, the first-line therapeutic intervention is fluid resuscitation in an attempt to improve their cardiac output (COP). However, fluids must be given only if the chance of improving COP exists. So, assessing fluid responsiveness is crucial. To our knowledge, yet no studies comparing the end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test and the variation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter with respiration (ΔIVC) in hypovolemic cases. So, our aim is to use both tests as indices for responsiveness to fluid in septic mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. The Patients and Method: Thirty-four MV septic patients were enrolled and baseline COP assessment was performed followed by an EEO test applied to each patient, after which, COP was measured to detect the probable responders (defined as an increased COP by ≥ 15%) and non-responders. Then, ΔIVC was assessed for the same patients to predict the probable responders (with ΔIVC >12%) and non-responders. Finally, fluid therapy was initiated as per the guidelines of surviving sepsis campaign (2021) followed by COP re-assessment to determine actual fluid responders\ on-responders. Results: 67% of the cases was responding to fluid. Receiver operating characteristic showed areas under curve for EEO and ΔIVC in predicting responsiveness to fluid were 0.597 and 0.925, respectively. EEO (32.4%) was predictive with 47.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The ΔIVC (64.7%) was predictive with 91.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Conclusion: IVC-respiratory variation showed better values in prediction of response to fluid in MV patients with sepsis than EEO test.

Predictors of fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a narrative review.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness has been considered an essential tool for modern fluid management. However, most studies in this field have focused on patients in intensive care unit despite numerous research throughout several decades. Therefore, the present narrative review aims to show the representative method's feasibility, advantages, and limitations in predicting fluid responsiveness, focusing on the operating room environments. Firstly, we described the predictors of fluid responsiveness based on heart-lung interaction, including pulse pressure and stroke volume variations, the measurement of respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter, and the end-expiratory occlusion test and addressed their limitations. Subsequently, the passive leg raising test and mini-fluid challenge tests were also mentioned, which assess fluid responsiveness by mimicking a classic fluid challenge. In the last part of this review, we pointed out the pitfalls of fluid management based on fluid responsiveness prediction, which emphasized the importance of individualized decision-making. Understanding the available representative methods to predict fluid responsiveness and their associated benefits and drawbacks through this review will aid anesthesiologists in choosing the most reliable methods for optimal fluid administration in each patient during anesthesia in the operating room.

Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients?

BackgroundAn increase in cardiac index (CI) during an end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOt) predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. However, if CI monitoring is unavailable or the echocardiographic window is difficult, using the carotid Doppler (CD) could be a feasible alternative to track CI changes. This study investigates whether changes in CD peak velocity (CDPV) and corrected flow time (cFT) during an EEOt were correlated with CI changes and if CDPV and cFT changes predicted fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.MethodsProspective, single-center study in adults with hemodynamic instability. The CDPV and cFT on carotid artery Doppler and hemodynamic variables from the pulse contour analysis EV1000™ were recorded at baseline, during a 20-s EEOt, and after fluid challenge (500 mL). We defined responders as those who increased CI ≥ 15% after a fluid challenge.ResultsWe performed 44 measurements in 18 mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock and without arrhythmias. The fluid responsiveness rate was 43.2%. The changes in CDPV were significantly correlated with changes in CI during EEOt (r = 0.51 [0.26–0.71]). A significant, albeit lower correlation, was found for cFT (r = 0.35 [0.1–0.58]). An increase in CI ≥ 5.35% during EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with 78.9% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.85. An increase in CDPV ≥ 10.5% during an EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with 96.2% specificity and 53.0% sensitivity with an AUROC of 0.74. Sixty-one percent of CDPV measurements (from − 13.5 to 9.5 cm/s) fell within the gray zone. The cFT changes during EEOt did not accurately predict fluid responsiveness.ConclusionsIn septic shock patients without arrhythmias, an increase in CDPV greater than 10.5% during a 20-s EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with > 95% specificity. Carotid Doppler combined with EEOt may help optimize preload when invasive hemodynamic monitoring is unavailable. However, the 61% gray zone is a major limitation (retrospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04470856 on July 14, 2020).

Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Combined End-Expiratory and End-Inspiratory Occlusion Tests in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

End-expiratory occlusion (EEO) and end-inspiratory occlusion (EIO) tests have been successfully used to predict fluid responsiveness in various settings using calibrated pulse contour analysis and echocardiography. The aim of this study was to test if respiratory occlusion tests predicted fluid responsiveness reliably in cardiac surgical patients with protective ventilation. This single-centre, prospective study, included 57 ventilated patients after elective coronary artery bypass grafting who were indicated for fluid expansion. Baseline echocardiographic measurements were obtained and patients with significant cardiac pathology were excluded. Cardiac index (CI), stroke volume and stroke volume variation were recorded using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis at baseline, after performing EEO and EIO tests and after volume expansion (7 mL/kg of succinylated gelatin). Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac index by 15%. Neither EEO, EIO nor their combination predicted fluid responsiveness reliably in our study. After a combined EEO and EIO, a cut-off point for CI change of 16.7% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 61.8%, specificity of 69.6% and ROC AUC of 0.593. In elective cardiac surgical patients with protective ventilation, respiratory occlusion tests failed to predict fluid responsiveness using uncalibrated pulse contour analysis.

End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Mini-fluid Challenge Test for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Acute Circulatory Failure.

Predicting which patients with acute circulatory failure will respond to the fluid by an increase in cardiac output is a daily challenge. End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and mini-fluid challenge (MFC) can be used for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients with spontaneous breathing activity, cardiac arrhythmias, low-tidal volume and/or low lung compliance. The objective of the study is to evaluate the value of EEOT and MFC-induced rise in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) in predicting fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure in comparison to the passive leg-raising (PLR) test. Hundred critically ill ventilated and sedated patients with acute circulatory failure were studied. LVOT VTI was measured by transthoracic echocardiography before and after EEOT (interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration over 15 s), and before and after MFC (100 ml of Ringer lactate was infused over 1 min). The variation of LVOT VTI after EEOT and the MFC was calculated from the baseline. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of LVOT VTI after EEOT and MFC to predict fluid responsiveness were determined. After PLR, stroke volume (SV) increased by ≥12% in 49 patients, who were defined as responders and 34 patients in whom the increase in SV <12% were defined as nonresponders. A cutoff of 9.1% Change in VTI after MFC (ΔVTIMFC) predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUROC of 0.96 (P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% and 88.9%, respectively. Change in VTI after EEOT (ΔVTIEEOT) >4.3% predicted fluid responsiveness with sensitivity and specificity 89.4% and 88.9%, respectively, with an AUROC of 0.97 (P < 0.001), but in 17 patients, EEOT was not possible because triggering of the ventilator by the patient's inspiratory effort. In conclusion, in mechanically ventilated patients with acute circulatory failure Δ VTIMFC and Δ VTI EEOT accurately predicts fluid responsiveness.

Methods of assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: anarrative review.

A growing body of evidence shows that some septic patients experience fluid overload, which leads to an increased number of serious complications and death. This is because the majority of septic patients are fluid non-responders. Therefore, a reliable distinction of which patient would benefit from fluid boluses is crucial in current sepsis mana-gement. Several methods used to assess fluid responsiveness have been developed. The principle of "dynamic" measurements (in contrast to static indices such as central venous pressure) involves the induction of a change in cardiac preload and the measurement of its effect on stroke volume. Dynamic methods are based on either heart-lung interaction during mechanical ventilation or on an assessment of change in cardiac stroke volume in response to fluid provocative stimuli such as rapid fluid administration, passive leg raising, or the end-expiratory occlusion test. Most dynamic measurements are easy to perform and interpret as well as being available at the bedside. However, they vary in their invasiveness, difficulty in performance, reliability, and limitations. In this study, we provide an overview of various methods for assessing fluid responsiveness and indicate those that potentially lead to haemodynamically guided fluid restrictive treatment that would prevent fluid overload in septic patients.

Fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation and low tidal volume ventilation through the pulse pressure variation after tidal volume challenge in the post-operative cardiac surgery

Abstract Background It is known that in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery, strict control of hemodynamic variables and blood volume is necessary, since there is an imbalance between oxygen supply and consumption. Thus, the present study seeks to validate methods previously used in different clinical situations to predict fluid responsiveness, in the current scenario of the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Purpose To evaluate the influence of “tidal volume challenge” from 6 ml / kg to 8 ml / kg of the predicted body weight (PBW) in conjunction with the end expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) in the variation of pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Methodology This prospective study included 30 patients after cardiac surgery. Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were initially recorded in mechanical ventilation at 6 ml/kg and after tidial volume challenge and with the EEOT at 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW). After recorded the intervention data, there was a return to ventilation at 6 ml/kg and a saline infusion of 500 ml was performed for 15 minutes. Fluid responsiveness was defined for patients who had an increase of 10% or more in velocity time integral (VTI) by echocardiogram after volume expansion compared to baseline value. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of fluid response status. Sensitivity and specificity analyzes were performed to determine the predictive precision of each parameter. Results The main result of our study is that, when the tidal volume is increased from 6 to 8 ml/kg of PBW, the relative increase in pulse pressure variation (%ΔPPV6–8) predicts with excellent accuracy responsiveness to fluids with cut-off values of 18.3%, with sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 84% (P=0.019). Although changing PPV6, EEOT6 and EEOT8 are not reliable in predicting fluid responsiveness, they still require additional calculations. PPV8 also discriminates between responders and non-responders; however, with sensitivity (78.6%) and specificity (66.6%) when the value found in the PPV8 is up 8.5, but without statistical significance (figure). Conclusion The challenge of tidal volume and its influence on the ΔPP variation has excellent accuracy to predict fluid responsiveness in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. EEOT did not present good accuracy to predict fluid responsiveness in patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened

BackgroundThe end-expiratory occlusion (EEXPO) test detects preload responsiveness, but it is 15 s long and induces small changes in cardiac index (CI). It is doubtful whether the Starling bioreactance device, which averages CI over 24 s and refreshes the displayed value every 4 s (Starling-24.4), can detect the EEXPO-induced changes in CI (ΔCI). Our primary goal was to test whether this Starling device version detects preload responsiveness through EEXPO. We also tested whether shortening the averaging and refresh times to 8 s and one second, respectively, (Starling-8.1) improves the accuracy of the device in detecting preload responsiveness using EEXPO.MethodsIn 42 mechanically ventilated patients, during a 15-s EEXPO, we measured ∆CI through calibrated pulse contour analysis (CIpulse, PiCCO2 device) and using the Starling device. For the latter, we considered both CIStarling-24.4 from the commercial version and CIStarling-8.1 derived from the raw data. For relative ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 during EEXPO, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to detect preload responsiveness, defined as an increase in CIpulse ≥ 10% during passive leg raising (PLR). For both methods, the correlation coefficient vs. ∆CIpulse was calculated.ResultsTwenty-six patients were preload responders and sixteen non preload-responders. The AUROC for ∆CIStarling-24.4 was significantly lower compared to ∆CIStarling-8.1 (0.680 ± 0.086 vs. 0.899 ± 0.049, respectively; p = 0.027). A significant correlation was observed between ∆CIStarling-8.1 and ∆CIpulse (r = 0.42; p = 0.009), but not between ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIpulse. During PLR, both ∆CIStarling-24.4 and ∆CIStarling-8.1 reliably detected preload responsiveness.ConclusionsShortening the averaging and refresh times of the bioreactance signal to 8 s and one second, respectively, increases the reliability of the Starling device in detection of EEXPO-induced ∆CI.Trial registration: No. IDRCB:2018-A02825-50. Registered 13 December 2018.

Changes in peripheral perfusion index during intraoperative end-expiratory occlusion tests do not predict the response to fluid administration in patients undergoing lung protective ventilation.

The end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) may predict the response to fluid administration in patients undergoing lung-protective ventilation, but arterial catheter insertion is necessary to evaluate changes in stroke volume (SV). The peripheral perfusion index is a potential noninvasive alternative to evaluate SV. The aim of this study is to investigate whether changes in perfusion index during an intraoperative EEOT can predict the response to fluid administration in patients undergoing lung-protective ventilation (tidal volume 7ml/kg predicted body weight). Forty-one elective surgical patients were enrolled. The SV and perfusion index were recorded before (baseline), during a 40-s EEOT and after volume expansion (250ml of lactated Ringer's solution over 10min). Patients with an increase in SV greater than 10% after volume expansion were defined as responders. ΔPI (change in perfusion index between baseline and 20 (ΔPI20) or 40s (ΔPI40) after the beginning of EEOT were calculated using: ΔPI20 (%) = [(PI at 20s after EEOT beginning-PIbaseline)/PIbaseline] × 100, ΔPI40 (%) = [(PI at 40s after EEO beginning-PIbaseline)/PIbaseline] × 100). Sixteen patients were responders, and 25 were non-responders. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves generated for ΔPI20 and ΔPI40 to predict response to a fluid challenge were 0.561 (95% CI 0.374-0.749) and 0.688 (95% CI 0.523-0.852), respectively. Changes in perfusion index during intraoperative EEOT in patients undergoing lung-protective ventilation (7ml/kg) were unable to predict the response to fluid administration.

How to monitor cardiovascular function in critical illness in resource-limited settings.

Purpose of reviewHemodynamic monitoring is an essential component in the care for critically ill patients. A range of tools are available and new approaches have been developed. This review summarizes their availability, affordability and feasibility for hospital settings in resource-limited settings.Recent findingsEvidence for the performance of specific hemodynamic monitoring tools or strategies in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. Repeated physical examination and basic observations remain a cornerstone for patient monitoring and have a high sensitivity for detecting organ hypoperfusion, but with a low specificity. Additional feasible approaches for hemodynamic monitoring in LMICs include: for tissue perfusion monitoring: urine output, skin mottling score, capillary refill time, skin temperature gradients, and blood lactate measurements; for cardiovascular monitoring: echocardiography and noninvasive or minimally invasive cardiac output measurements; and for fluid status monitoring: inferior vena cava distensibility index, mini-fluid challenge test, passive leg raising test, end-expiratory occlusion test and lung ultrasound. Tools with currently limited applicability in LMICs include microcirculatory monitoring devices and pulmonary artery catheterization, because of costs and limited added value. Especially ultrasound is a promising and affordable monitoring device for LMICs, and is increasingly available.SummaryA set of basic tools and approaches is available for adequate hemodynamic monitoring in resource-limited settings. Future research should focus on the development and trialing of robust and context-appropriate monitoring technologies.

Mini fluid chAllenge aNd End-expiratory occlusion test to assess flUid responsiVEness in the opeRating room (MANEUVER study): A multicentre cohort study.

The fluid challenge response in surgical patients can be predicted by functional haemodynamic tests. Two tests, the mini-fluid challenge (mini-FC) and end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), have been assessed in a few small single-centre studies with conflicting results. In general, functional haemodynamic tests have not performed reliably in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing laparotomy. This trial is designed to address and compare the reliability of the EEOT and the mini-FC in predicting fluid responsiveness during laparotomy. Prospective, multicentre study. Three university hospitals in Italy. A total of 103 adults patients scheduled for elective laparotomy with invasive arterial monitoring. The study protocol evaluated the changes in the stroke volume index (SVI) 20 s (EEOT20) and 30 s (EEOT30) after an expiratory hold and after a mini-FC of 100 ml over 1 min. Fluid responsiveness required an increase in SVI at least 10% following 4 ml kg-1 of Ringer's solution fluid challenge infused over 10 min. Haemodynamic data, including SVI, were obtained from pulse contour analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the tests were compared with assess fluid responsiveness. Fluid challenge administration induced an increase in SVI at least 10% in 51.5% of patients. The rate of fluid responsiveness was comparable among the three participant centres (P = 0.10). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (95% CI) of the changes in SVI after mini-FC was 0.95 (0.88 to 0.98), sensitivity 98.0% (89.5 to 99.6) and specificity 86.8% (75.1 to 93.4) for a cut-off value of 4% of increase in SVI. This was higher than the SVI changes after EEOT20, 0.67 (0.57 to 0.76) and after EEOT30, 0.73 (0.63 to 0.81). In patients undergoing laparotomy the mini-FC reliably predicted fluid responsiveness with high-sensitivity and specificity. The EEOT showed poor discriminative value and cannot be recommended for assessment of fluid responsiveness in this surgical setting. NCT03808753.

Changes in the Plethysmographic Perfusion Index During an End-Expiratory Occlusion Detect a Positive Passive Leg Raising Test.

The end-expiratory occlusion test for assessing preload responsiveness consists in interrupting mechanical ventilation for 15 seconds at end-expiration and measuring the cardiac index changes. The perfusion index is the ratio between the pulsatile and the nonpulsatile portions of the plethysmography signal and is, in part, determined by stroke volume. We tested whether the end-expiratory occlusion-induced changes in perfusion index could detect a positive passive leg raising test, suggesting preload responsiveness. Observational study. Medical ICU. Thirty-one ventilated patients without atrial fibrillation. We measured perfusion index (Radical-7 device; Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) and cardiac index (PiCCO2; Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany) before and during a passive leg raising test and a 15-second end-expiratory occlusion. In 19 patients with a positive passive leg raising test (increase in cardiac index ≥ 10%), compared to the baseline value and expressed as a relative change, passive leg raising increased cardiac index and perfusion index by 17% ± 7% and 49% ± 23%, respectively, In these patients, end-expiratory occlusion increased cardiac index and perfusion index by 6% ± 2% and 11% ± 8%, respectively. In the 12 patients with a negative passive leg raising test, perfusion index did not significantly change during passive leg raising and end-expiratory occlusion. Relative changes in perfusion index and cardiac index observed during all interventions were significantly correlated (r = 0.83). An end-expiratory occlusion-induced relative increase in perfusion index greater than or equal to 2.5% ([perfusion index during end-expiratory occlusion-perfusion index at baseline]/perfusion index at baseline × 100) detected a positive passive leg raising test with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 ± 0.03. This threshold is larger than the least significant change observed for perfusion index (1.62% ± 0.80%). Perfusion index could be used as a reliable surrogate of cardiac index for performing the end-expiratory occlusion test. Confirming previous results, the relative changes in perfusion index also reliably detected a positive passive leg raising test.

Parameters of fluid responsiveness.

On the basis of recent literature, we summarized the new advances on the use of available dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Reliability of passive leg raising to assess fluid responsiveness is well established provided that a real-time haemodynamic assessment is available. Recent studies have focused on totally noninvasive techniques to assess its haemodynamic effects with promising results. Presence of intra-abdominal hypertension is associated with false-negative cases of passive leg raising. Use of pulse pressure and stroke volume variations is limited and other heart-lung interaction tests have been developed. The tidal volume challenge may overcome the limitation of low tidal volume ventilation. Preliminary data suggest that changes in pulse pressure variation during this test well predict fluid responsiveness. Growing evidence confirms the good predictive performance of the end-expiratory occlusion test. All these dynamic tests allow selecting appropriate fluid responders and preventing excessive fluid administration. Performance of a mini-fluid challenge may help for the decision-making process of fluid management if other tests are not available. Several new dynamic variables and monitoring techniques to predict fluid responsiveness were investigated in the past years. Nevertheless, further research investigating their reliability and feasibility in larger cohorts is warranted. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEXPO test)-induced changes in cardiac output (CO) measured by any haemodynamic monitoring device, as indicators of preload responsiveness.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were screened for original articles. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis determined the Area under the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUSROC) curve of EEXPO test-induced changes in CO to detect preload responsiveness, as well as pooled sensitivity and specificity and the best diagnostic threshold.ResultsThirteen studies (530 patients) were included. Nine studies were performed in the intensive care unit and four in the operating room. The pooled sensitivity and the pooled specificity for the EEXPO test-induced changes in CO were 0.85 [0.77–0.91] and 0.88 [0.83–0.91], respectively. The AUSROC curve was 0.91 [0.86–0.94] with the best threshold of CO increase at 5.1 ± 0.2%. The accuracy of the test was not different when changes in CO were monitored through pulse contour analysis compared to other methods (AUSROC: 0.93 [0.91–0.95] vs. 0.87 [0.82–0.96], respectively, p = 0.62). Also, it was not different in studies in which the tidal volume was ≤ 7 mL/kg compared to the remaining ones (AUSROC: 0.96 [0.92–0.97] vs. 0.89 [0.82–0.95] respectively, p = 0.44). Subgroup analyses identified one possible source of heterogeneity.ConclusionsEEXPO test-induced changes in CO reliably detect preload responsiveness. The diagnostic performance is not influenced by the method used to track the EEXPO test-induced changes in CO.Trial registration The study protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO: CRD42019138265.

Does End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test induced changes in cardiac index (CI) and in arterial pressure as predictors of fluid responsiveness in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Chinese database were screened for relevant original and review articles. The meta-analysis determined the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and threshold for the EEO test assessed with CI and arterial pressure. In addition, heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were performed. We included 13 studies involving 479 adult patients and 523 volume expansion. Statistically significant heterogeneity was identified, and meta-regression indicated that prone position was the major sources of heterogeneity. After removal of the study performed in prone position, heterogeneity became nonsignificant. EEO-induced changes in CI (or surrogate) are accurate for predicting fluid responsiveness in semirecumbent or supine patients, with excellent pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 0.88-0.95, I = 0.00%), specificity of 89% (95% CI, 0.83-0.93, I = 34.34%), and a summary AUROC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). The mean threshold was an EEO-induced increase in CI (or surrogate) of more than 4.9 ± 1.5%. EEO test exhibited better diagnostic performance in semirecumbent or supine patients than prone patients, with higher AUROC (0.95 vs. 0.65; P < 0.001). In addition, EEO test exhibited higher specificity (0.93 vs. 0.83, P < 0.001) in patients ventilated with low tidal volume compared with normal or nearly normal tidal volume. However, EEO test was less accurate when its hemodynamic effects were detected on arterial pressure. EEO-induced changes in arterial pressure exhibited a lower sensitivity (0.88 vs. 0.92; P = 0.402), specificity (0.77 vs. 0.90; P = 0.019), and AUROC (0.87 vs. 0.96; P < 0.001) compared with EEO-induced changes in CI (or surrogate). EEO test is accurate to predict fluid responsiveness in semirecumbent or supine patients but not in prone patients. EEO test exhibited higher specificity in patients ventilated with low tidal volume, and its accuracy is better when its hemodynamic effects are assessed by direct measurement of CI than by the arterial pressure.

Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test.

In patients in the prone position, the reliability of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV) and the use of functional hemodynamic tests to predict fluid responsiveness have not previously been established. Perioperatively, in this setting, optimizing fluid management can be challenging, and fluid overload is associated with both intraoperative and postoperative complications. We designed this study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of baseline PPV and SVV, the tidal volume (VT) challenge (VTC) and the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) in predicting fluid responsiveness during elective spinal surgery. The study protocol was started during a period of intraoperative hemodynamic stability after prone positioning and before the administration of any vasopressor: (1) at baseline, the controlled ventilation was set at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) (T0); (2) patients underwent the first EEOT (EEOT6) by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds; (3) the ventilation was set again at 6 mL/kg PBW for 1 minute (T1); (4) the VTC was applied by increasing the VT up to 8 mL/kg PBW for 1 minute; (5) the ventilation was kept at 8 mL/kg PBW for 1 minute (T2); (6) a second EEOT (EEOT8) was performed; (7) the VT was reduced back to 6 mL/kg PBW for 1 minute (T3); (8) a fluid challenge of 250 mL of Ringer's solution was infused over 10 minutes. After each step, a complete set of hemodynamic measurements was recorded. Neither PPV and SVV values recorded at T3 nor the EEOT6 or the EEOT8 predicted fluid responsiveness. The change in PPV after VTC application predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.00), showing a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 94.7%, using a cutoff increase of 12.2%. The change in SVV after VTC application predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the curve 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.00) showing a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 94.7%, using a cutoff increase of 8.0%. A linear correlation between stroke volume index changes after fluid challenge administration and the changes in PPV and SVV after VTC application was observed (r = 0.71; P < .0001 and r = 0.68; P < .0001, respectively). In prone elective neurosurgical patients, the baseline values of PPV and SVV and the EEOT fail to predict fluid responsiveness, while the VTC is a very reliable functional hemodynamic test and could be helpful in guiding intraoperative fluid therapy.

End-Expiratory Occlusion Test During Increase of Vasomotor Tone in a Rabbit Model of Hemorrhage

End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been proposed as a preload responsiveness test that overcomes several limitations of pulse pressure (PPV) and stroke volume (SVV) variations. We compared the ability of EEOT versus SVV and PPV to predict fluid responsiveness during the increase of the vasomotor tone in a rabbit model of hemorrhage. Ten rabbits were anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated during basal load (BL), after progressive blood withdrawal (BW), and after volume replacement. Other two sets of data were obtained during vasomotor increase by phenylephrine (PHE) infusion in BL and BW. We estimated the change of stroke volume (∆SVEEOT) and aortic flow (∆AoFEEOT) during the EEOT. PPV and SVV were obtained by the variation of beat-to-beat PP and SV, respectively. Baseline PPV, SVV, ∆SVEEOT, and ∆AoFEEOT increased significantly after BW, with a decrease of aortic flow (P < 0.05). PHE induced a significant decrease of PPV and SVV, but without affecting ∆SVEEOT, and ∆AoFEEOT. We conclude that ∆SV and ∆AoF during EEOT kept the ability to predict fluid responsiveness during PHE infusion in a rabbit hemorrhage model. This result may suggest the advantage of EEOT with respect to SVV and PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness during vasomotor tone increase.

End-Expiratory Occlusion Test to Predict Fluid Responsiveness Is Not Suitable for Laparotomic Surgery.

The end-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated intensive care patients; however, its utility in the operating room is questioned. We assessed end-expiratory occlusion test in laparotomic surgery for predicting volume expansion. Forty-six patients were included in this study: stage 1 (n = 26) with an end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds, followed by volume expansion, which consisted of 250 mL of colloid over 5 minutes and stage 2 (n = 20) with an end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds followed by volume expansion. The last 10 patients had transdiaphragmatic pressures probed. Patients with an increase in cardiac index >15% after volume expansion were responders. Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume (SV) index, and cardiac index were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were established for changes in SV and pulse pressure induced by end-expiratory occlusion test and pulse pressure variation using the responders status for volume expansion as outcome. A total of 44 (38%) volume expansions were deemed responders. After end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds, no hemodynamic variables were significantly increased. After end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds, SV index increased in responders (37.1 ± 8.8 mL/m after end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds versus 35.7 ± 8.6 before; P < .0001). End-expiratory occlusion test could not discriminate responders from nonresponders. Only pulse pressure variation had significantly different area under the curve from that expected by chance (0.7 [0.57-0.81]; P = .002 for end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds; and 0.78 [0.64-0.89]; P = .0001 for end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds). After laparotomy, gastric pressure decreased significantly (4 [2.75-5] vs 2 [2-4] cm H2O; P = .0417); no difference was noticed in the transdiaphragmatic gradient. End-expiratory occlusion test was not reliable to discriminate responders from nonresponders after volume expansion during laparotomic surgery.