Emicizumab Prophylaxis Research Articles

Factor X consumption attenuates the coagulation effect of emicizumab: a case of severe hemophilia A treated with emicizumab and factor VIII-bypassing agents.

In patients with hemophilia A with inhibitor (PwHA-I), emicizumab drastically reduces bleeding events. However, few studies have investigated the behavior and effects of factor X (FX) in patients who require intensive treatment with factor VIII-bypassing agents (BPA) and emicizumab. A 59-year-old man with HA-I receiving emicizumab prophylaxis was admitted to our hospital because of acute gangrenous cholecystitis. He received percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and laparoscopic cholecystectomy along with repeated administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). On day 10, a large hematoma developed around the residual gallbladder. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) suggested poor effect of rFVIIa and reduced activity of emicizumab. Considering that this could be due to consumption of FX, plasma-derived FVIIa/FX agent (pdFVIIa/X) was administered, and ROTEM parameters recovered considerably. The patient was discharged on day 19 uneventfully. Plasma assays revealed that FX antigen level (FX:Ag) was 107.5% at baseline but then decreased. Administration of pdFVIIa/FX restored FX:Ag (pre/post 47.2%/125.5%). ROTEM and thrombin generation assay with in vitro addition of anti-emicizumab antibody suggested that low FX:Ag was responsible for attenuating the effect of emicizumab, and pdFVIIa/FX administration restored coagulation potentials. In PwHA-I receiving intensive treatment with rFVIIa under emicizumab prophylaxis, FX consumption might attenuate the effect of emicizumab.

Real-world experience of emicizumab prophylaxis in Korean children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors

PurposeHemophilia A is a genetic disorder characterized by a lack of factor VIII (FVIII). Emicizumab, a recombinant humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody, mimics the function of FVIII. In this article, we present data on an initial real-world evaluation of emicizumab use in Korean children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.MethodsThis study was conducted from June 2020 to March 2024 at 4 centers in Korea. The participants were pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors who had received emicizumab treatment for over 6 months. The mean and median annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) and mean and median annual joint bleeding rates (AJBRs) were compared.ResultsEach of the 21 patients in the study received an emicizumab loading regimen of 3 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a modified maintenance regimen of which 2 patients (9.5%) received a 1.5 mg/kg weekly dose, 3 patients (14.3%) received a 6 mg/kg dose every 4 weeks, and the remaining 16 patients (76.2%) received a 3 mg/kg dose every 2 weeks. Before emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, the mean and median ABRs for all patients were 7.04 (SD ± 5.83) and 6.52 (range 0–21.74), respectively. After receiving emicizumab treatment, the mean and mediam ABRs decreased to 0.41 and zero, respectively. Additionally, 85.7% of the patients achieved no bleeding events within 6 months of starting the treatment.ConclusionThese first real-world data in Korea indicate that emicizumab is effective and safe for pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.

Evaluating the benefits of emicizumab prophylaxis for haemophilia A with inhibitors: A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis in Thailand's upper-middle income setting.

In Thailand, an upper-middle-income country, managing haemophilia A (HA) with inhibitors poses significant challenges, often necessitating bypassing agents (BPAs) for bleeding control. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of emicizumab, a novel prophylactic agent, as an alternative to both episodic and prophylactic BPA treatments from a societal perspective. A Markov model was employed to estimate the lifetime societal costs and outcomes of emicizumab prophylaxis for HA patients with inhibitors. Treatment efficacy, cost, and epidemiological data were obtained through a comprehensive literature review and incorporated into the model. A 5-year budget impact analysis complemented the cost-utility analysis, with a 3% annual discount rate applied to future costs and outcomes. In the base-case scenario, emicizumab prophylaxis in HA patients aged 2 years and above demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, yielding 18.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient over a lifetime and resulting in cost savings of 138 million Thai Baht (THB) compared to BPA prophylaxis. Compared to episodic BPA treatment, emicizumab yielded 30.5 QALYs and saved 25 million THB per patient. The 5-year budget impact was projected at 1775 million THB. Emicizumab offers a cost-saving approach for HA treatment with inhibitors in Thailand, promising significant health benefits and budgetary savings. This supports its potential inclusion in Thailand's National List of Essential Medicines to enhance haemophilia care access. Managing haemophilia A (HA) with inhibitors in Thailand, an upper-middle-income country, faces challenges due to limited access to effective treatments or newer drugs for bleeding management. Emicizumab prophylaxis found to as a cost-effective and viable alternative to traditional treatments, effectively preventing bleeding in Thai HA patients over 2 years old with inhibitors. Demonstrating improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs, emicizumab prophylaxis outperforms episodic BPA treatments, positioning it as a superior treatment option for HA patients with inhibitors in Thailand.

CHIEF: A retrospective self-control study of children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors comparing emicizumab to FVIII prophylaxis.

Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked bleeding disorder diagnosed by a deficiency in factor VIII (FVIII). For severe HA (SHA), prophylaxis clotting factor concentrates (CFC) has become the standard of care; however, it imparts a high treatment burden and typically results in an annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of 2-6. Emicizumab, a subcutaneously administered FVIII substitute, has become the de facto standard-of-care prophylaxis for children with SHA in many countries. Previous clinical trials of emicizumab have assessed ABR in patients greater than 12years without inhibitors, and in children less than 12years with inhibitors; however, there is little information published regarding the ABR of emicizumab compared to CFC in non-inhibitor SHA children. Using a retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we conducted a self-control analysis of 15 patients less than 12years of age during equivalent periods of CFC versus emicizumab prophylaxis. The mean ABR on CFC and emicizumab was 1.79 and 1.13 (p=.092), respectively, with a substantially decreased rate of joint bleeds (CFC 0.94; emicizumab 0.33; p=.001) and spontaneous bleeds (CFC 0.79; emicizumab 0.23; p=.008). No safety events were recorded for patients while administering emicizumab. The mean annual cost of CFC prophylaxis was $515,340 (SD $199,540), compared to $328,410 (SD $137,230) for emicizumab prophylaxis (p<.001). Emicizumab resulted in an improved ABR compared to CFC, especially for joint and spontaneous bleeds, had fewer administration complications, and was substantially less expensive compared to CFC prophylaxis; however, more research is necessary for a complete understanding of the effect of emicizumab on joint health and muscle bleeds.

Emicizumab in Children with Severe Hemophilia A.

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of emicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A (HA). Emicizumab is a novel therapeutic drug which is the first and only non-factor replacement agent licensed for use in people with HA. Pediatric patients aged 1 mo to 12 y with severe HA and frequent / life threatening bleeding events, with or without coagulation protein factor VIII inhibitors were enrolled (n = 18) in this observational pre-post study. Patients were switched from therapy involving on-demand or prophylactic factor VIII/bypassing agents/immune tolerance induction to emicizumab prophylaxis and followed up for 52 wk. One year before initiating emicizumab, a total of 229 bleeding events occurred among the enrolled children. After emicizumab prophylaxis, 5 patients had one episode of bleeding event each with a mean bleeding duration of 1.2 d in one year. The mean annualized bleeding rate significantly reduced from 12.7 ± 8.61 events pre-emicizumab prophylaxis to 0.28 ± 0.46 events post-emicizumab prophylaxis (p < 0.001). Out of the total cohort (n = 18), 72.2% of patients (n = 13) had no bleeding events (95% Confidence interval: 46.4-89.3) while on emicizumab. The mean annualized joint bleeding rate reduced from 9.72 ± 7.44 to 0.17 ± 0.38 (p < 0.001). The target joint resolution was 100% and no adverse events were noted. Emicizumab was found to be effective and safe as a prophylactic agent for the treatment of severe HA with and without factor VIII inhibitors. Emicizumab prophylaxis can optimize treatment outcomes and promote a better quality of life in children with severe HA.

Final Analysis Results from the AGEHA Study: Emicizumab Prophylaxis for Acquired Hemophilia A with or without Immunosuppressive Therapy.

Primary analysis of the phase III AGEHA study suggested a favorable benefit-risk profile for emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with acquired hemophilia A (PwAHA); however, only patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy (IST; Cohort 1) were included. To present final analysis results of AGEHA, including data on IST-ineligible patients (Cohort 2) and on long-term prophylaxis with emicizumab. For patients in both Cohorts 1 and 2, emicizumab was administered subcutaneously at 6 mg/kg on Day 1, 3 mg/kg on Day 2, and 1.5 mg/kg once weekly from Day 8 onward. Twelve patients (Cohort 1) and two patients (Cohort 2) were enrolled. Duration of emicizumab treatment was 8 to 639 days (median: 44.5 days) in Cohort 1 and 64 and 450 days in Cohort 2. In both cohorts, no major bleeds were observed after initial emicizumab administration. Six patients started their first rehabilitation sessions during emicizumab treatment and no rehabilitation-related bleeds occurred. Twenty-three surgeries were performed under emicizumab prophylaxis and there were no bleeds related to surgeries. Although asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis was reported in one patient in the primary analysis, no other thrombotic events occurred thereafter. Two patients developed anti-emicizumab antibodies, one of whom showed accelerated emicizumab clearance. Tailored IST approaches (delayed initiation, no use, or reduced dose) were successfully executed in three patients undergoing emicizumab prophylaxis. These results suggest that emicizumab prophylaxis has a favorable benefit-risk profile in PwAHA regardless of eligibility for IST.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Egyptian Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia A: Single Center Cross Sectional Study.

Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked hereditary bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII activity. Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that replaces the function of activated FVIII and prevents bleeds in patients with hemophilia A. Emicizumab is expected to reduce the risk of severe bleeds in those patients with their subsequent complications. However, data about its safety and efficacy in patients with hemophilia A is limited. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of Emicizumab prophylaxis in Egyptian pediatric patients with HA. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 88 HA patient who received prophylaxis with Emicizumab. Breakthrough bleeding episodes as well as annualized bleeding rate(ABR) were reported for all patients before and after Emicizumab prophylaxis. All adverse events during prophylaxis were reported to evaluate the safety of Emicizumab. Joint bleeds were present in 94 % of the patients. 58% of them had one target joint, 36.4% had more than one target joint while 5.6% had no target joints. 17% of patients were positive for FVIII inhibitors. The median annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) was reduced remarkably after Emicizumab prophylaxis (36 before versus zero after Emicizumab. Also, the median ABR was 48 before Emicizumab versus zero after Emicizumab. Eight patients developed mild breakthrough bleeding episodes. The most common adverse events were local reaction at the injection sites, headache, arthralgia, fever and diarrhea. Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower rate of bleeding events in patients with HA with and without inhibitors. The majority of patients had zero bleeds with Emicizumab prophylaxis.

Changes in coagulation potential over time after administration of recombinant activated factor VII in an emicizumab-treated hemophilia A patient with inhibitors.

We describe a 67-year-old patient with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHA-I) receiving emicizumab prophylaxis who underwent surgical treatment for pseudoaneurysm. He was treated with a bolus infusion of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; 79μg/kg) immediately before surgery, and a second dose of rFVIIa after an initial treatment on day 1. A third rFVIIa bolus was infused 17h after the second dose on day 2, and the treatment was continued every 24h on day 3 and day 4. Treatment with rFVIIa was discontinued on day 4. No perioperative bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Coagulation potentials at 8h after rFVIIa administration determined by clot waveform analysis (CWA) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) were within near-normal ranges, and results at 17h after rFVIIa administration showed coagulation function comparable to that in the patient without rFVIIa. Our experimental data suggest that the coagulation potential in FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with both 0.28µg/mL (11.2μg/kg) rFVIIa and emicizumab was equivalent to or greater than that spiked with 2.2µg/mL (90μg/kg) rFVIIa alone. Thus, administration of rFVIIa every 8h may be feasible for managing perioperative treatment in emicizumab-treated PwHA-I.

Reduced doses of emicizumab achieve good efficacy: Results from a national-wide multicentre real-world study in China.

Reduced doses of emicizumab improve the affordability among patients in developing countries. However, the relationship between variant dose selection and efficacy in the real world of China is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of emicizumab especially in those on reduced dose regimens in a real-world setting. We carried out a multicentre study from 28 hospitals between June 2019 and June 2023 in China and retrospectively analysed the characteristics including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, bleeding episodes, and surgical procedures. In total, 127 patients with haemophilia A, including 42 with inhibitors, were followed for a median duration of 16.0 (IQR: 9.0-30.0) months. Median age at emicizumab initiation was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0) years. Median (IQR) consumption for loading and maintenance was 12.0 (8.0-12.0) and 4.2 (3.0-6.0) mg/kg/4weeks, respectively. While on emicizumab, 67 (52.8%) patients had no bleeds, whereas 60 (47.2%) patients had any bleeds, including 26 with treated bleeds. Compared to previous treatments, patients on emicizumab had significantly decreased annualized bleeding rate, annualized joint bleeding rate, target joints and intracerebral haemorrhage. Different dosages had similar efficacy except the proportion of patients with treated spontaneous bleeds and target joints. Adverse events were reported in 12 (9.4%) patients. Postoperative excessive bleeding occurred following two of nine procedures. This is the largest study describing patients with HA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis on variant dose regimens in China. We confirmed that nonstandard dose is efficacious and can be considered where full-dose emicizumab is ill affordable.

Additional Factor X Enhances Emicizumab-Driven Coagulation Function in Patients with Hemophilia A and Hemophilia A Mice.

Bypassing agents are used for breakthrough bleedings in patients with hemophilia A with inhibitor (PwHAwI) receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Previous study demonstrated a weak binding affinity between emicizumab and factor (F)X (K d; 1.85 μM), and that this value was much greater than the plasma FX concentration (∼130 nM). We speculated that increased FX levels could enhance coagulation potential in emicizumab-treated patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). To investigate the relationship between FX concentrations and emicizumab-driven coagulation. Plasma FX (up to 1,040 nM) and emicizumab (50 µg/mL) were added to FVIII-deficient plasmas, and plasma-derived FX (520 nM) or recombinant (r)FVIIa (2.2 µg/mL) was added to plasmas from three emicizumab-treated PwHAwI. The adjusted maximum coagulation velocity (Ad|min1|) by clot waveform analysis and peak thrombin (PeakTh) by thrombin generation assay in them were evaluated. Emicizumab (3.0 mg/kg), human (h)FIX (100 IU/kg), and various doses of hFX (100-500 IU/kg) were intravenously administered to HA mice. Clotting time/clot formation time (CT/CFT) were assessed using rotational thromboelastometry, and blood loss was estimated by a tail-clip assay. The addition of FX to FVIII-deficient plasma with emicizumab increased Ad|min1| and PeakTh. The coagulation parameters in emicizumab-treated PwHAwI spiked with additional FX remained within the normal range as well as the additional rFVIIa. In animal models, hFX injection shortened the CT and CT + CFT. The shorter CT and CT + CFT, and the lower blood loss were evident after 200 or 500 IU/kg hFX administration, and those indices were comparable to those in wild-type mice. Supplementation with FX may improve emicizumab-driven hemostasis in PwHA.

Cost-effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis for haemophilia A with inhibitors: an adaptive health technology assessment for the Indian setting

ObjectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis for patients having haemophilia A with inhibitors in the Indian context using an adaptive health technology assessment (aHTA) methodology.DesignEconomic evaluation using multiple approaches...

Transitioning from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy: A simulation study for individuals with severe haemophilia A.

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec, a gene therapy evaluated in the phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial, supports endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) production to prevent bleeding in people with severe haemophilia A. Individuals receiving emicizumab, an antibody mimicking the function of activated FVIII, were excluded from GENEr8-1 enrolment since emicizumab was an investigational therapy at the time of trial initiation. Utilize pharmacokinetic simulations to provide guidance on best practices for maintaining haemostatic control while transitioning from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec. To estimate bleeding risk at weekly intervals following valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion, a published emicizumab pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate emicizumab concentrations and merged with FVIII activity time-course data for participants in GENEr8-1. The analysis investigated three approved emicizumab dosing regimens for two transition scenarios that varied whether the last dose of emicizumab was administered on the same day or 4weeks after valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion. Simulations demonstrated administering the last emicizumab dose the day of valoctocogene roxaparvovec infusion and 4weeks after offered similar levels of haemostatic control, and bleeding risk was similar for all emicizumab dosing regimens. An algorithm was developed to provide guidance for discontinuation of emicizumab. Theoretical cases based on GENEr8-1 participants are presented to illustrate how decisions may vary among individuals. Pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated no clinically meaningful difference in bleeding risk caused by decaying emicizumab levels and rising gene therapy-derived endogenous FVIII for all examined emicizumab doses and dosing regimens. Therefore, multiple approaches can safely transition individuals from emicizumab prophylaxis to valoctocogene roxaparvovec.

Bleeding control improves after switching to emicizumab: Real-world experience of 177 children in the PedNet registry.

Despite the rapid uptake of emicizumab in the paediatric haemophilia A (HA) population, real-world data on the safety and efficacy is limited. To report on bleeding and safety in paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Data were extracted from the multicentre prospective observational PedNet Registry (NCT02979119). Children with haemophilia A, and ≥50 FVIII exposures or inhibitors present receiving emicizumab maintenance therapy were analysed. Data were summarized as medians with interquartile range (IQR, P25-P75). Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), annualized (joint) bleeding rate (A(J)BR) during emicizumab and ≤2 years before emicizumab prophylaxis were modelled and compared using negative binomial regression. Total of 177 patients started emicizumab at median 8.6 years (IQR 4.8-13.1), most had no FVIII inhibitors (64%). Follow up before emicizumab was median: 1.68 years (IQR: 1.24-1.90) and during emicizumab: 1.32 years (IQR:.94-2.11). In patients without inhibitors, mean ABR reduced after starting emicizumab from 2.41 (CI 1.98-2.95) to 1.11 (CI.90-1.36, p<.001), while AJBR reduced from.74 (CI.56-.98) to.31 (CI.21-.46, p<.001). Concordantly, in patients with inhibitors, mean ABR reduced from 5.08 (CI 4.08-6.38) to.75 (CI.56-1.01, p<.001), while AJBR reduced from 1.90 (CI 1.42-2.58) to.34 (CI.21-.56, p<.001). Five emicizumab-related adverse events were reported (3% of the cohort), including one patient with antidrug antibodies. This study showed improved bleeding control compared to previous treatment and a favourable safety profile during emicizumab therapy in paediatric haemophilia A patients.

Health-related quality of life in children with severe hemophilia A on emicizumab prophylaxis

Background Emicizumab is a novel nonreplacement therapy for patients with hemophilia A. It is intended to reduce the frequency and severity of serious bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. Aim To assess how emicizumab affected quality of life and physical activity in children with severe hemophilia A. Patients and methods Thirty-seven children with severe hemophilia A received emicizumab prophylaxis. We used EQ-5D-Y and pedHAL activity list questionnaires to assess quality of life and physical activity, respectively, at baseline (before receiving emicizumab prophylaxis) and after 1 year of regular emicizumab prophylaxis. Results The mean age of the children included in the study was 9.32 ± 3.75 years. Of them, 19 patients were with FVIII inhibitors (51.35%), and 18 patients were negative for FVIII inhibitors (48.65%). The median (interquartile range) PedHAL sum score was 57.6 (48.8–62) at baseline, then reached 76 (70–81.5) after a year of emicizumab prophylaxis; this change was found to be statistically significant (P&lt;0.001). Also, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with no problem in all EQ-5d-Y dimensions after a year of emicizumab prophylaxis (P&lt;0.05). The median (interquartile range) value of the visual analog scale score at baseline was 67 (54–75) and became 76 (70–81.5) after a year of receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. This improvement was statistically significant (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion Emicizumab prophylaxis improves quality of life and physical activity in children with severe hemophilia A.

Management of Urgent Bleeding in Patients with Hemophilia A: Focus on the Use of Emicizumab.

Management of patients with hemophilia A (HA) requires the knowledge and experience of specialized health care professionals. However, these patients may need to be attended in emergencies, outside the referral hospital, where health care professionals do not know about hemophilia and/or new innovative treatments. This study aimed to develop a simple and practical algorithm that could be used in emergency situations by nonspecialized treaters in HA and bleeding with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors under emicizumab prophylaxis. A group of experts agreed on a simple algorithm, easy to operate, adapted from previous international guidelines, and based on their clinical experience. The proposed algorithm starts with identifying the patient, confirming the diagnosis of HA, prophylaxis with emicizumab, and/or use of other treatments. After stabilizing the patient and stratifying the bleeding risk, the patient is managed according to the presence/absence of FVIII inhibitors. Patients without FVIII inhibitors should receive FVIII concentrate. Dose and follow-up depend on bleeding localization and severity. Patients with FVIII inhibitors should preferably receive recombinant activated factor VII as bypass agent. A basic coagulation assay, FVIII assessment, and FVIII inhibitors detection assays are necessary in an emergency. However, these tests should be interpreted with caution and appropriately chosen, as emicizumab may alter the results. The management of patients with HA is challenging in emergency situations, especially if they are treated with new agents. Nonspecialized in coagulopathies health care professionals have limited understanding of the disease, highlighting the need for an algorithm to assist them in making informed decisions.

Multicenter evaluation of the hemostatic activity of emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A

BackgroundEmicizumab has been approved for the prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors. However, spontaneous and trauma-induced breakthrough bleeds have been reported in patients on emicizumab prophylaxis, and no laboratory assay has been validated to evaluate the hemostatic activity of emicizumab. ObjectivesThe thrombin generation assay (TGA) could be a surrogate marker of the hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab. The correlation between TGA and the methods used to measure emicizumab blood concentration was evaluated in this study. MethodsTGA was modified by the use of a trigger reagent combining a very low concentration of tissue factor and activated factor (F)XI. Emicizumab quantification was performed by 3 methods: the modified 1-step FVIII assay and 2 methods based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS). ResultsUsing tissue factor/activated FXI–triggered TGA and platelet-poor plasma, a relationship was observed between the area under the thrombin generation curve (endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]) and the clinical response of patients to emicizumab. The ultrastructure of fibrin clots was consistent with ETP results and showed that emicizumab had a hemostatic activity equivalent to 20 to 30 IU/dL of FVIII. Finally, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses showed no correlation between ETP and LC-MS nor with modified 1-stage FVIII assay, but a statistically significant correlation between the LC-MS methods and the time-to-peak results of the TGA. ConclusionUsing a modified TGA, this study showed that patients who experienced breakthrough bleeds while on emicizumab had a lower thrombin-generating capacity compared with others with good clinical response to emicizumab.

Exploring the effects of Factor Xa inhibitors on thrombin generation in people with haemophilia

Optimal management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people with haemophilia (PWH) is a growing issue, given the continuing improvement in life expectancy among PWH. The evolving treatment paradigms targeting higher trough levels and the advent of non-factor replacement therapies (NFRT) means much of the ‘protection’ PWH were thought to have against CVD may be lost. There is a paucity of evidence regarding the safety of using anticoagulants in PWH. We designed a study assessing the thrombin generation (TG) of PWH of different severities and treatments, compared to non-haemophilia patients receiving a Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban), healthy controls, and assessing TG parameters of adding FXa inhibitor to the plasma of PWH receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. In total, 40 patients were included. TG was initiated with 5pM tissue factor (TF) using the calibrated automated thrombinoscope. Compared to those with mild haemophilia, patients receiving a FXa inhibitor had higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) (1278.42 vs 1831.36) and velocity index (40.71 vs 112.56), but both had a similar peak height (154.0 vs 262.63) and time to peak (both 5.83). People with severe haemophilia receiving emicizumab had significantly improved TG parameters compared to those not receiving emicizumab – ETP 1678.11 vs 809.96 and peak height 233.8 vs 92.05; however, when FXa inhibitor was added their TG parameters deteriorated to the severe haemophilia range (ETP 1179.60 and peak height 103.05). TG may provide additional useful information regarding the use of anticoagulants in PWH.

Predictive parameters for spontaneous joint bleeding during emicizumab prophylaxis

AbstractEmicizumab is approved for prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A (HA). Despite its efficacy in reducing bleeding, some patients on emicizumab still experience hemarthrosis, but no tool is yet available to identify those at a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate whether laboratory measurements (global coagulation assays and emicizumab concentration) and/or arthropathy scores can distinguish patients at higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding while on emicizumab prophylaxis. A thrombin generation assay was performed upon the addition of tissue factor and synthetic phospholipids. Nonactivated thromboelastography was performed on citrated whole blood. Emicizumab concentrations were measured using a modified 1-stage factor VIII assay. The degree of hemophilic arthropathy was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score and Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between variables and bleeding. The predictive power of these variables was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Forty patients with severe HA, with or without inhibitors, on emicizumab prophylaxis were enrolled in an observational cohort study. Ten of 40 developed spontaneous joint bleeding. None of the laboratory parameters were able to distinguish patients with a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. ROC analysis showed that during emicizumab prophylaxis, only the presence of synovitis and a higher HEAD-US score were associated with spontaneous joint bleeding (area under the curve, 0.84). A greater degree of arthropathy and the presence of synovitis could help predict the risk of spontaneous joint bleeding in patients with HA on emicizumab prophylaxis.

Haemophilia in the era of novel therapies: Where do inhibitors feature in the new landscape?

The advent of therapeutic recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) protein infusions revolutionized the care of persons with haemophilia in the 1990s. It kicked off an era with the increasing use of prophylactic factor infusions for patients and transformed conversations around the ideal trough activity levels as well as the ultimate goals in tailored, individualized care. Our knowledge surrounding the immunologic basis of inhibitor development and treatment derives from a time when patients were receiving frequent factor infusions and focused on immune tolerance induction following inhibitor development. More recently, care was revolutionized again in haemophilia A with the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII function, to prevent bleeding. The use of emicizumab prophylaxis has resulted in a significantly slower accumulation of factor exposure days and continued effective prophylaxis in the case of inhibitor development. While emicizumab is effective at reducing the frequency of bleeding events in patients with haemophilia A, management of breakthrough bleeds, trauma, and surgeries still requires additional treatment. Ensuring that FVIII is a therapeutic option, particularly for life-threatening bleeding events and major surgeries is critical to optimizing the care of persons with haemophilia A. Other novel non-factor concentrate therapies, including rebalancing agents, will dramatically change the landscape for persons with haemophilia B with inhibitors. This review discusses the changing landscape regarding the timing of inhibitor development and management strategies after inhibitor development, stressing the importance of education across the community to continue to vigilantly monitor for inhibitors and be prepared to treat persons with inhibitors.

How much prophylaxis is enough in haemophilia?

Prophylaxis has become standard of care for all persons with haemophilia (PWH) with a severe phenotype. However, 'standard prophylaxis' with either factor or non-factor therapies (currently only emicizumab available) is prohibitively expensive for much of the world. We sought to address the question of 'How much prophylaxis is enough?' and 'Can it be individualized?' and specifically 'Can emicizumab be individualized?'. We reviewed the literature on prophylaxis in haemophilia since its inception in the 1950s to the present, the development of more and less intense factor prophylaxis regimens and their outcomes and additionally the published outcomes of prophylaxis with low dose emicizumab. What these experiences collectively show is that low dose emicizumab does result in significant benefits to patients whilst being much less expensive than a "one size fits all" emicizumab prophylaxis approach. We also took note that some non-factor therapies still in development are individualized given that high doses of these can potentially put patients at risk. Prophylaxis is now clearly accepted as standard of care for PWH with a severe phenotype but now in a very short time a large assortment of different treatment options for prophylaxis have become/are becoming available and the haemophilia community will need to determine how to best use these recognizing that no 'one treatment fits all'.