Emergency Room Readmission Research Articles

Emergency room readmission, an avoidable problem? Analysis and stratification of readmissions in a trauma reference center.

Hospital readmission is a common way to assess the quality of care provided in an emergency service. In this context, the aim of this study is to quantify and stratify readmissions in a trauma reference emergency service. A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted with patients readmitted, twice or more, in the emergency service within a maximum period of 30 days from the initial admission - hospitalized or not. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from electronic medical records. The readmission rate for the service was 4.11% for all readmissions and 2.23% for avoidable readmissions. Within this group, 61.19% were likely avoidable, 19.47% possibly avoidable, and 19.34% eventually avoidable. Regarding time, 48.16% occurred within one week of the initial readmission. Furthermore, no statistically significant association was found in the analysis of biological sex, occupational accident, and comorbidities. A statistically significant association was found in the analysis of age and ambulance transport (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.17-1.59). The study highlighted that there are still readmissions in the emergency department that could be avoided. A significant relationship was observed between readmissions and patient ages, and ambulance transport.

Abstract 155: NORAHOME. A Virtual Multimodal Stroke Remote Monitoring Hospitalization Program

Background and Aims: The rising pressure on medical services, highlighted throughout the pandemic, has revealed a need for alternative methods of hospital care. Our objective is to evaluate a home hospitalization virtual multimodal monitoring program (NORAHOME) for patients who have had a previous transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, as an efficient strategy compared to Routine Clinical Practice (RCP). Methods: A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with a suspected TIA or minor stroke evaluated at the emergency room of a tertiary hospital by a neurologist between 1st December 2020 and 1st June 2022, had completed NORAHOME and was compared with a historic control group of patients with a suspected TIA or minor stroke who had completed a conventional hospitalization (RCP) between 1st June and 30th November 2020. Results: 430 patient cases were analyzed, 215 patients in the prospective group were compared with a retrospective cohort of the same number of patients. Mean age 75.21 ± 12.6 years; 54.9% women. In the NORAHOME group we observed a recurrence rate of 2.3% (5 patients) and mortality of 2.8% (6 patients) during the follow up. In the RCP group 6.5% (14 patients) presented recurrence and 7% (15 patients) died. No significant differences were found in the risk of early recurrence, emergency room readmission or functional outcome between the groups. Conclusions: In our series of TIA and minor stroke patients, NORAHOME is a safe strategy compared to RCP. The development and implementation of digital home-hospitalization programs may reduce direct hospital costs by shortening length of stay and reducing hospital readmission. Moreover, the program improves self-assessed health outcomes reported by patients and their experience with the healthcare system compared to the RCP.

Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine

PurposeIntraoperative wound irrigation prior to closure during total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an essential component of preventing infections and limiting health care system costs. While studies have shown the efficacy of dilute betadine in reducing infection risk, there remains concerns over its safety profile and theoretical inactivation by blood and serum. This study aims to compare infection and wound complications between chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and betadine lavage during TJA.MethodsAll primary TJA between 2019–2021 were analyzed at a single institution, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), wound drainage, 30 and 90-day emergency room (ER) readmission due to wound complications, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery rate were compared between patients undergoing intraoperative CHG versus betadine lavage prior to closure. Baseline demographics were controlled, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to compare complication rates.ResultsA total of 410 TJA, including 160 hip and 250 knee arthroplasties were included. Compared to the dilute betadine cohort, all TJA patients undergoing CHG lavage had a statistically significant lower 30 and 90-day emergency room readmission rate due to wound complications. Both hip and knee arthroplasty patients with CHG had a statistically significant lower rate of postoperative superficial drainage and dressing saturation at clinic follow-up, but only knee arthroplasty patients had significant decreased readmission rate for incisional wound vacuum placement and close inpatient monitoring of wound healing. Among all TJA, there was no significant association in the rate of PJI requiring return to the OR between groups.ConclusionsAlthough betadine is cost-effective and has been shown to reduce PJI rates, there remains concerns in the literature over soft tissue toxicity and wound healing. This study suggests CHG may be as efficacious as dilute betadine in preventing PJI while also decreasing the risk of superficial drainage and wound complications needing unplanned ER visits during the acute postoperative period.

Impact of a pharmacy-driven transitions-of-care program on postdischarge healthcare utilization at a national comprehensive cancer center.

Results of a study comparing readmission rates and medication adherence measures before and after implementation of a pharmacy-led transitions-of-care (TOC) program are reported. A quasi-experimental case-control study was conducted to assess the impact of a TOC program including medication history-taking and reconciliation services, inpatient and discharge education, and 72-hour and 30-day postdischarge phone follow-up. Hospital and emergency room (ER) readmission rates were compared in cohorts of oncology patients admitted to a large teaching hospital during specified periods before TOC program implementation (the standard-of-care [SOC] group) or after program implementation (the TOC group). The primary outcome was unplanned hospital or ER readmission within 30 days after initial discharge. The secondary endpoint was first-fill medication adherence. Benefits associated with specific TOC interventions were assessed in subgroup analyses. After propensity score matching, both study groups consisted of 323 patients. The SOC group had 76 patients (23.5%) and the TOC group had 74 patients (22.9%) who were readmitted to the hospital or ER within 30 days, with a significant reduction in hospital readmissions in 1 subgroup of TOC patients versus SOC controls (absolute difference, -7.6%; p = 0.0159). While there were no significant overall differences in readmission rates between the TOC and SOC groups, hospital readmissions were reduced in the subgroup of TOC patients who received both medication history-taking and reconciliation services and phone follow-up as TOC interventions.

Abstract P352: Racial Disparity in Post-stroke Readmission - a South Carolina Perspective

Background: Readmissions after acute hospitalizations are a cause of both risk and expense, and many of them are potentially preventable. Importantly, risk-standardized hospital readmission rates are sometimes used as a yardstick of the quality of care offered. However, racial variability in readmissions might involve factors beyond quality of care and has not been studied extensively. During our pilot investigation using 90-day post-stroke readmissions data at Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), we found significant disparities between African Americans and Caucasians. Objective: To identify differences in readmissions between African Americans and other races and determine preventable readmissions from a pragmatic viewpoint. Methods: We obtained deidentified data from Health Sciences South Carolina (HSSC) Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW). The data was comprised of three institutions: Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Palmetto Health and Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center. The data consisted of on adult admissions with index diagnosis considered as an ischemic stroke (or closely related) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9, ICD-10) codes between January 2011 and April 2017. Of these, we will determine readmission and reason for readmission over 90-day period. Readmission can be hospital or emergency room readmission. Results: Our database contains 32,548 patients who have been provided clinical care for stroke. Out of these patients 8,308 (25.5%), 23,085 (70.9%) and 1,155 (3.5%) are African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. We will present weekly readmission trends over 90 days and evaluate if there are disparities across races. We will apply chi-square test and Student’s t-test to determine statistical significance. For weekly readmission trends over 90 days, we will apply Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to identify difference in readmission patterns across races. We will also identify confounders like socioeconomic status and age and their influence in the racial disparity. Conclusions: From a single center retrospective data, we found that 90-days readmission rates involve African Americans in a disproportionate manner. This multicenter data analysis will further shed light on the etiology of readmission, confounders and the care offered.

Abstract P258: Racial Disparity in 90-Day Post-Stroke Readmission - An MUSC Perspective

Background: Readmissions after acute hospitalizations are a cause of both risk and expense, and many of them are potentially preventable. Importantly, risk-standardized hospital readmission rates are sometimes used as a yardstick of the quality of care offered. However, racial variability in readmissions might involve factors beyond quality of care and has not been studied extensively. Objective: To identify differences in readmissions between African Americans and other races and determine preventable readmissions from a pragmatic viewpoint. Methods: We obtained deidentified data from Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Electronic Data Warehouse (EDW) on adult admissions with index diagnosis considered as an ischemic stroke (or closely related) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 433.x, 434.x, 436.x, 437.x between January 2011 and June 2014. Of these, we determined readmission and reason for readmission over 90-day period. Readmission can be hospital or emergency room readmission. We obtained race as the only linked demographic. Results: Of the 1953 patients admitted with index diagnoses of stroke, 765 (39%), 1148 (59%) and 50 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. At 90-days, 256 patients were readmitted as in-patient, of which 128 (50%), 126 (49%) and 2 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. On the other hand, 241 patients visited Emergency Room, of which 175 (73%), 65 (26%) and 1 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. On adjusting readmissions to index admissions, 17%, 11% and 4% of African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively, were readmitted in hospital, while 23%, 6% and 2% of African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively, visited Emergency Room over 90-days period. Conclusions: 90-days readmission rates involve African Americans in a disproportionate manner. This demands further investigation on the etiology of readmission and the care offered.