Emergency Medicine Training Programs Research Articles

Game-Based Learning and Gamification, Effective Innovation in Emergency Medicine Training Program

Background: Game-based learning (GBL) and gamification have recently been applied in medical education. Both approaches utilize methods to teach specific skills or knowledge in a more motivating manner than traditional teaching. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of GBL and gamification in an emergency medicine (EM) residency training program by comparing education through e-learning with GBL and gamification. Methods: We randomly enrolled EM residents into two groups. Over the course of one educational year, one group of residents participated in a GBL and gamification course (10 designed GBL and gamification sessions), while the other group received e-learning materials (10 designed podcasts and videos). Traditional training programs continued as routine in both groups. After the intervention, we assessed learners' educational achievements (exam scores) in both groups. Additionally, EM residents' viewpoints (in the first group) on the innovative program were collected using the model for the evaluation of educational games (MEEGA). Finally, the short version of the postgraduate hospital educational environment measure (PHEEM) was administered to evaluate learners' general feedback (in the first group) about the new educational environment after the intervention. Results: Game-based learning and gamification significantly improved scores in written, oral, and electronic exams assessing knowledge, skills, clinical reasoning, and judgment among EM residents (P-value < 0.05). All MEEGA items under “Usability” and “Player Experience” had mean scores > 3 (indicating agree and totally agree) (median score = 3 - 4). All PHEEM items under “Teacher Support and Skills” and “Work Conditions and Allocated Time for Learning” also had mean scores > 3 (indicating agree and totally agree) (median score = 4). Conclusions: Game-based learning and gamification enhanced EM residents’ knowledge, skills, clinical reasoning, and judgment. Learners largely agreed on the positive impact of the intervention on their residency training program.

Emergency practitioner-administered ultrasound nerve blocks in the emergency department: A retrospective analysis

Abstract OBJECTIVES: In the realm of acute pain management within emergency departments (EDs), the prevalent reliance on systemic analgesics, notably opioids, presents challenges due to associated risks and suboptimal efficacy. The emerging alternative of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (USGNBs) has shown promise in prospective studies. However, the safety and efficacy of USGNBs when performed by emergency medicine practitioners remain largely unexplored, necessitating this study to address the research gap. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of Emergency physician-performed USGNBs and changes in patient-reported pain (pre- and postnerve block) at 15 and 30 min. In addition, the time taken to perform nerve blocks, type of nerve block, frequency, indications, procedure time, and complications were all studied. METHODS: Conducted at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Pune, India, this single-center, retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of USGNBs in the ED context. A retrospective analysis covered 274 emergency practitioner-performed USGNBs recorded from January 2022 to December 2023. Participants included consecutive ED patients consenting to nerve blocks, with practitioners utilizing bupivacaine (0.25%) and ropivacaine (0.25%) based on individual preferences. The study systematically recorded patient demographics, block types, indications, complications, and pre- and postpain scores on a Numerical Rating Scale. RESULTS: The study demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores post-USGNB, with an average decrease of 2.9 ± 1.08 at 15 min and 5.8 ± 1.39 at 30 min. Commonly performed blocks included the femoral nerve, fascia iliaca, and serratus anterior, with notable pain relief in fracture management cases. Procedural durations varied, ranging from 2 to 12 min, while four complications were reported, including diaphragmatic paresis and arterial punctures during interscalene nerve block and fascia iliac compartment blocks, respectively. CONCLUSION: This extensive study in an academic ED setting supports the proficiency of emergency practitioners in performing USGNBs. The findings emphasize the transformative potential of USGNBs in academic ED pain management, showcasing notable pain reduction and minimal complications. These results advocate for the integration of advanced pain relief techniques into emergency medicine training programs, contributing to a comprehensive approach to acute pain management.

POCUS for pediatric appendicitis in the pediatric emergency department: An 8-year retrospective review.

In many centers, pediatric radiology-performed ultrasound and/or POCUS fellowship training are not readily available. To present our experience using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in a pediatric emergency medicine training program without POCUS fellowship-trained staff, and to demonstrate that POCUS of the appendix is feasible outside the context for POCUS fellowship training. We identified children diagnosed with appendicitis or periappendiceal abscess from June 2016 to June 2024. Variables reviewed include details of PED visit such as presenting symptoms, laboratory and imaging results, and PED treatment, as well as surgical report and pathology result. We evaluated the frequency and performance characteristics of POCUS over the study period. 999 children were diagnosed with appendicitis. POCUS was performed in 360 of 845 cases (43%) of histology-confirmed appendicitis and in 19 of 69 cases (28%) in which histology was negative for appendicitis. Both the number of POCUS examinations for appendicitis and the percentage of examinations correctly identifying appendicitis steadily increased over the study period. Accuracy was highest in the 5-10-year age range and lowest for females from 10 to 15 years. In 96% of cases with a pathology result of appendicitis and a positive POCUS examination, POCUS correctly identified appendicitis. However, only 6 of 19 POCUS examinations in children without appendicitis on histology found no appendicitis. Performance of POCUS for appendicitis was significantly associated with increased opioid administration and a 20-min mean decrease in length of pediatric emergency department stay. POCUS for appendicitis within the context of PEM fellowship training is feasible and associated with decreased length of stay.

Recent Trends and Challenges in Employment for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Survey of Graduating Residents' Perspectives.

The landscape of the emergency medicine (EM) workforce has undergone significant changes recently, posing challenges for residents who are about to graduate from EM training programs. The objective of this study was to survey graduating residents' perceptions of the recent EM job market. We conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving EM residents from programs in New York and New Jersey between August 2021 and November 2021. The survey consisted of 12 multiple-choice questions that focused on graduating EM residents' perceptions of the EM job market, its impact on their job search, and their interest in pursuing fellowship training. During the study period, 436 survey results were collected from 26 EM residency programs. Of the 418 respondents, 233 (56%) expressed their intention to start their job search earlier than their counterparts in previous years, as highlighted by the survey. Among respondents, 141 (76%) postgraduate year (PGY)-2, 139 (79%) PGY-3, and 47 (85%) PGY-4 residents anticipated a challenging job search. Nearly 90% of respondents believed that the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic would affect both academic and nonacademic medical centers in terms of job openings. A total of 248 (59%) were interested in pursuing a fellowship after residency. Most residents preferred job opportunities on the East and West Coasts of the United States. The findings highlight the increasing competitiveness and challenges residents face in securing their first job, the declining interest in pursuing fellowships as residents progress in their training, and the geographic preferences for job opportunities.

The Effects of a Structured Resiliency Program on Indicators of Burnout in Medical Residents

Because of the well documented burnout and stress experienced by medical residents, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education (ACGME) has directed training programs to address these issues in their residents. The current study describes a resiliency enhancement program administered to residents from differing residencies. Method: Residents received group-based sessions focusing on awareness of stress reactions, mindfulness, cognitive coping skills and balancing life and work. All sessions were interactive. The training occurred over a 9-month time span. Residents provided informed consent so that data could be collected. The percentage of burnout was calculated based on one indicator (high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, or low personal accomplishment using the Maslach Burnout Scale). Standardized assessment instruments were administered at the beginning (September) and the end of the program (May) to assess the impact of the intervention. Residents were in training at a medium-sized academic medical center. They came from urology, internal medicine, emergency medicine and neurology training programs. Eighteen female and 51 male residents participated. Results: Baseline rates of burnout were as follows: urology residents, 89%; internal medicine, 73%; neurology, 50%; emergency medicine, 22%. There was a significant decrease in perceived stress for the overall group following the intervention. Residents who significantly improved on mindfulness measures also showed significant improvement on resiliency, stress, and personal accomplishment scores. Residents who significantly lowered perceived stress also lowered emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and increased resiliency and compassion satisfaction. Discussion: This study demonstrated that a resiliency enhancement program and data collection after IRB approval is feasible and effective during medical residency. Based on our analysis, mindfulness, and cognitive skills to reduce perceptions of stress seem to be critical components. Future research is necessary to identify elements of the program most relevant to specific residencies.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2023-2024)

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2024 annual report on the status of physicians training in ACGME-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.

Residency training programs in anesthesiology, intensive care and emergency medicine: from curriculum to practice.

Residency programs in anesthesiology and intensive care (AIC), and emergency medicine (EM) continually evolve to ensure well-prepared trainees for these critical fields of healthcare. The objective of this study was to collect comprehensive feed-back from AIC and EM residents, comprising opinions and attitudes on: curriculum and structure of the residency program; scope of training environment, opportunities and complexity; training guidance and mentorship; teaching approach. An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted among AIC and EM trainees during December 2023-January 2024 and June 2023-July 2023, respectively. Two hundred and thirty-five answers were collected: 137 (73/64 female/male) and 98 (55/43 female/male) respondents from the AIC and EM programs, respectively. Overall feed-back was equivalent for both residency programs, with differences related to the distinct characteristics of each medical specialty. The main issues identified across the programs were the need to improve and diversify the teaching approaches, with trainees' strong desire for more professional guidance, mentoring, and constant feed-back. The findings would inform decision-making beyond current residency programs in these critical care specialties, highlighting the need to design solutions for interactive and highly immersive educational experiences, such as simulation, augmented reality or virtual reality.

Sued, Subpoenaed or Sworn in: Use of a Flipped-Classroom Style Medicolegal Workshop for Emergency Medicine Residents.

It is an unfortunate truth that Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians will, at some point, have contact with the medicolegal system. However, most EM residency training programs lack education on the legal system in their curriculum, leaving EM physicians unprepared for litigation. To fill this gap, we designed a high-yield and succinct medical legal workshop highlighting legal issues commonly encountered by EM physicians. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this curriculum by measuring pre and post knowledge questions. A two-hour session included a case-based discussion of common misconceptions held by physicians about the legal system, proper steps when interacting with the legal system and review of legal documents. This session was developed with the involvement of our hospital legal counsel and discussed real encounters. The effectiveness of the session was determined using pre- and post-session surveys assessing participant knowledge and comfort approaching the scenarios. A total of 34 EM residents had the opportunity to complete this workshop as a part of their conference curriculum. A total of 26 participants completed the pre-survey and 19 participants completed the post-survey. No participants had previous training in the legal aspects of medicine, including handling a subpoena, serving as a witness, or giving a deposition. The pre-survey demonstrated that there was significant uncertainty surrounding the processes, definitions, and the legal system interaction. Many participants stated they would not know what to do if they received a subpoena (85.71%), were called as a witness in a trial (96.43%) or receive correspondence from a lawyer (96.43%). The post survey revealed an increased knowledge base and confidence following the session. 100% of residents reported knowing what to do after receiving a subpoena, being called as a witness and understanding the process involved in giving a deposition. All residents reported that the session was beneficial and provided crucial information. EM residents have limited baseline understanding of how to approach common legal scenarios. Educational materials available for this curriculum topic are limited. Based on the rapid knowledge increase observed in our residents, we believe our workshop could be adapted for use at other residency programs.

RISE-EM: Resident Instruction in Social Emergency Medicine, a Cohort Study of a Novel Curriculum.

There is recognition in the field of emergency medicine (EM) that social determinants of health (SDoH) are key drivers of patient care outcomes. Leaders in EM are calling for curricula integrating SDoH assessment and intervention, public health, and multidisciplinary approaches to EM care throughout medical school and residency. This intersection of SDoH and the emergency care system is known as social emergency medicine (SEM). Currently, there are few resources available for EM training programs to integrate this content; as a result, few EM trainees receive adequate education in SEM. To address this gap, we developed a four-part training in SEM tailored to EM residency programs and medical schools. This curriculum, known as RISE-EM (Resident Instruction in Social Emergency Medicine), uses video lectures, case examples, and group discussions to engage trainees and develop competency in providing sound care that is grounded in evidence-based principles of SEM. In the current study, we tested RISE-EM by delivering the video lectures to residents and medical students in two training programs. We administered pre- and post-course knowledge tests and a post-course participant attitudes survey to assess the acceptability and potential efficacy of the program for improving SEM knowledge and attitudes among EM learners. We found it to be both feasible and acceptable to introduce SEM content in residency conferences, with preliminary data showing statistically significant improvement in knowledge of the content and self-efficacy to apply it to their clinical practice. In summary, RISE-EM has been highly valued by EM learners and viewed as a strong supplement to their existing training, and it has been shown to successfully improve SEM knowledge and attitudes.

Psychological safety and perceived organizational support in emergency medicine residencies.

The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE. Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments. A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%-96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., "Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue" had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE. PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.

Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine.

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a widely used framework for curriculum and assessment, yet the variability in emergency medicine (EM) training programs mandates the development of EPAs that meet the needs of the specialty as a whole. This requires eliciting and incorporating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (i.e., faculty, residents, and patients) in the development of EPAs. Without a shared understanding of what a resident must be able to do upon graduation, we run the risk of advancing ill-prepared residents that may provide inconsistent care. In an effort to address these challenges, beginning in February 2020, the authors assembled an advisory board of 25 EM faculty to draft and reach consensus on a final list of EPAs that can be used across all training programs within the specialty of EM. Using modified Delphi methodology, the authors came to consensus on an initial list of 22 EPAs. The authors presented these EPAs to faculty supervisors, residents, and patients for refinement. The authors collated and analyzed feedback from focus groups of residents and patients using thematic analysis. The EPAs were subsequently refined based on this feedback. Stakeholders in EM residency training endorsed a final revised list of 22 EPAs. Stakeholder focus groups highlighted two main thematic considerations that helped shape the finalized list of EM EPAs: attention to the meaningful nuances of EPA language and contextualizing the EPAs and viewing them developmentally. To foreground all key stakeholders within the EPA process for EM, the authors chose within the development process to draft; come to consensus; and refine EPAs for EM in collaboration with relevant faculty, patient, and resident stakeholders. Each stakeholder group contributed meaningfully to the content and intended implementation of the EPAs. This process may serve as a model for others in developing stakeholder-responsive EPAs.

Impact of Peer Feedback on the Quality of Academic Sessions in an Emergency Medicine Training Program: A Quality Improvement Project.

Introduction Feedback is at the heart of medical education; different teaching encounters call for different types of feedback. Due to multiple reasons presenters are not able to receive adequate feedback, which provides them with little to no areas to improve upon and hence affects the quality of the academic sessions(1). Feedback serves as a powerful tool in the realm of education, playing a vital role in shaping students' learning experiences and fostering their academic growth. Recognizing the importance of feedback and implementing effective feedback mechanisms can lead to enhanced learning outcomes, improved performance and increased motivation among learners(3). It can be incorporated to enhance teaching and learning techniques since it has an immediate impact on the process of acquiring knowledge and has a direct impact on both teaching and learning(4). Feedback has been shown to help speakers gain confidence, self-awareness, and enthusiasm(5). Methods: We designed a project to improve the quality of our academic day by integrating feedback forms into all our academic activities. In November 2022 we sent out a survey to all residents to evaluate the quality of the sessions in the academic day.Based on the responses received we incorporated feedback forms into each session to allow the audience to evaluate the speakers. All presenters presenting between February to July 2023 were provided with a QR code to be presented at the end of their presentation, to allow instant feedback by peers. At the end of the 6 month cycle we sent out 2 sets of surveys to both the speakers and audience to assess the impact of peer feedback on the quality of sessions presented during academic day. The surveys asked the audience and speakers to rate their experience of feedback forms and how it has impacted their performance. Each question was scored on a likert scale 1 to 5 with 1 being strongly disagree to 5 being strongly agree. Results: 30 out of 33 current residents responded to the surveys. Based on the responses received, there has been a positive outcome on all domains for both audience and speakers Fig 1,2). The audience felt it helped increase their weekly quiz scores(3.3/5), allowed them to better understand the topics(3.7/5) and improved the quality of presentations delivered (3.9/5). The speakers felt it helped them in delivering better lectures (4/5), Improved their ability to present to an audience (4.1/5), made them aware of their weakness and allowed them to work on them (4.3/5). Both the audience (4.3/5) and audience (4.4/5) would like to see the feedback forms to continue. Conclusion: In the era of formative assessment peer feedback will go a long way in improving the quality of educational activities. Our project has similar outcomes to multiple similar studies done elsewhere which have demonstrated an improvement in their educational experience (2). We hope our findings can aspire other programs in the region to incorporate similar feedback forms into their sessions. To evaluate effectiveness of peer feedback as a method of improving the quality of lectures conducted during academic day

Case-Based Virtual Escape Rooms: Using Feedback to Change Online Platforms.

Introduction Virtual escape rooms (VERs) have provided education in healthcare settings. VERs were developed to provide medical education related to pediatric toxicology. This study explores simulation technologies, specifically portals to create and host VERs, including Google Sites, a website-building platform, and Articulate 360, an e-learning platform. The design objective was to create an engaging educational tool using a VER on two pediatric toxicology scenarios. Methods Case-based VERs were developed on Google Sites and Articulate 360. The cases focused on organophosphate toxicity and acute iron toxicity. Google Sites technology was used to build the organophosphate toxicity case, which was implemented and piloted with emergency medicine (EM) trainees in India and workshop participants at the International Pediatric Simulation Symposia and Workshops (IPSSW) in 2022. The iron toxicity case was developed using Articulate 360 and piloted at IPSSW in 2023. Feedback was collected as a survey from participants. Questions focused on using VERs as an engaging educational model, benefits, areas for improvement, and future participation in VERs. Following the study, a focus group meeting was held with facilitators and developers and subsequently analyzed. Results Evaluations from participants and a focus group provided data demonstrating both platforms' utility. Participants completed surveys after each VER. Overall, 84.2% of respondents (n=60) from EM training programs in India, 90.9% of respondents (n=11) from IPSSW in 2022, and 100% of respondents (n=23) from IPSSW in 2023 agreed or strongly agreed that this was an engaging education model. Conclusion Different platforms may be used to develop engaging VERs for gamification in education. This study found that VERs based on pediatric toxicology scenarios created on Google Sites and Articulate 360 are engaging educational tools for distance learning. Simulation technologies have benefits and disadvantages for Google Sites and Articulate 360. Simulation developers and educators should consider time, funding, technological needs, and participant feedback when deciding which portal to choose when building a VER.

Good Saves: How Emergency Medicine Residents are Learning From Success.

The practice of learning from medical errors is well-established and well-researched in the literature on morbidity and mortality conferences. However, durable learning from case-based education occurs not only through the analysis of medical errors but also through the evaluation of how critical decisions were made to result in a positive clinical outcome, what we will call a "good save." The aim of the current study is to provide an overview of how US-based emergency medicine residencies are teaching using "good saves." A national survey of emergency medicine (EM) residency leadership was distributed through the Council of Residency Directors (CORD) and the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) listservs. A descriptive analysis of the results was undertaken. Residency leadership representing 67 different US EM training programs participated in our survey. Of these, only 19 programs use formal learning objectives and dedicated education time to teach from "good saves." Thirty-six programs provide informal recognition, often in the form of a "shout-out." Residency leadership is motivated to provide this recognition and learning through efforts to promote wellness and resiliency among EM residents. Notably, the use of prizes and awards is not necessary. Some EM residencies in the United States are making targeted efforts to promote the recognition of successful clinical care. This recognition and education are being used as tools both to promote wellness and to teach resiliency. However, there is wide heterogeneity in approaches. Our survey provides examples of the many ways that "good saves" can be incorporated into any EM residency curriculum with the potential for significant impact.

Characterizing Air Medical Transport Experiences in Emergency Medicine Residency Training Programs

ObjectiveAir medical transportation (AMT) of patients plays a critical role in the prehospital care of the ill patient. Despite its importance, there is no requirement in emergency medicine training programs to have direct experience or education on the topic, and data detailing current AMT experiences across programs are limited. MethodsA survey detailing program characteristics, AMT experience characteristics, and curriculum factors relating to AMT experience was sent to all 275 credentialed emergency medicine residency training programs in the United States. Our outcomes were to describe the characteristics of AMT and non-AMT programs (proportions) and to evaluate associations (odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals) between program characteristics and 1) AMT experience opportunity and 2) level of resident participation among AMT programs. ResultsTwo hundred (73%) programs responded, with 135 of 200 (68%) offering some type of AMT experience. The majority of programs offering AMT were 3 years (113 [84%]), university based (63 [47%]), and located in small urban areas (57 [42%]). When AMT was offered, most programs reported that the overall resident participation was low (≤ 20%). Programs that did not offer shift reduction or additional pay for participation in AMT were significantly more likely to have low participation than those with incentives (odds ratio = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-15.3). Around one third of AMT experiences allowed for direct patient care. Less than half of the responding programs reported a dedicated AMT curriculum. ConclusionThe majority of emergency medicine residency training programs offer an AMT experience, but this experience is highly variable, and overall participation by residents is low. Given the importance of AMT in the care of emergency patients, standardization and increased access to AMT experience and education should be considered by emergency medicine training programs moving forward.

Intersectional Disparities in Emergency Medicine Residents’ Performance Assessments by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex

Previous studies have demonstrated sex-specific disparities in performance assessments among emergency medicine (EM) residents. However, less work has focused on intersectional disparities by ethnoracial identity and sex in resident performance assessments. To estimate intersectional sex-specific ethnoracial disparities in standardized EM resident assessments. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones (Milestones) assessments to evaluate ratings for EM residents at 128 EM training programs in the US. Statistical analyses were conducted in June 2020 to January 2023. Training and assessment environments in EM residency programs across comparison groups defined by ethnoracial identity (Asian, White, or groups underrepresented in medicine [URM], ie, African American/Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Hispanic/Latine, and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander) and sex (female/male). Mean Milestone scores (scale, 0-9) across 6 core competency domains: interpersonal and communications skills, medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and system-based practice. Overall assessment scores were calculated as the mean of the 6 competency scores. The study sample comprised 128 ACGME-accredited programs and 16 634 assessments for 2708 EM residents of which 1913 (70.6%) were in 3-year and 795 (29.4%) in 4-year programs. Most of the residents were White (n = 2012; 74.3%), followed by Asian (n = 477; 17.6%), Hispanic or Latine (n = 213; 7.9%), African American or Black (n = 160; 5.9%), American Indian or Alaska Native (n = 24; 0.9%), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (n = 4; 0.1%). Approximately 14.3% (n = 386) and 34.6% (n = 936) were of URM groups and female, respectively. Compared with White male residents, URM female residents in 3-year programs were rated increasingly lower in the medical knowledge (URM female score, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.17), patient care (-0.18; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.01), and practice-based learning and improvement (-0.37; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.09) domains by postgraduate year 3 year-end assessment; URM female residents in 4-year programs were also rated lower in all 6 competencies over the assessment period. This retrospective cohort study found that URM female residents were consistently rated lower than White male residents on Milestone assessments, findings that may reflect intersectional discrimination in physician competency evaluation. Eliminating sex-specific ethnoracial disparities in resident assessments may contribute to equitable health care by removing barriers to retention and promotion of underrepresented and minoritized trainees and facilitating diversity and representation among the emergency physician workforce.

Gender and Inconsistent Evaluations: A Mixed-methods Analysis of Feedback for Emergency Medicine Residents.

Objectives: Prior research has demonstrated that men and women emergency medicine (EM) residents receive similar numerical evaluations at the beginning of residency, but that women receive significantly lower scores than men in their final year. To better understand the emergence of this gender gap in evaluations we examined discrepancies between numerical scores and the sentiment of attached textual comments. Methods: This multicenter, longitudinal, retrospective cohort study took place at four geographically diverse academic EM training programs across the United States from July 1, 2013-July 1, 2015 using a real-time, mobile-based, direct-observation evaluation tool. We used complementary quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze 11,845 combined numerical and textual evaluations made by 151 attending physicians (94 men and 57 women) during real-time, direct observations of 202 residents (135 men and 67 women). Results: Numerical scores were more strongly positively correlated with positive sentiment of the textual comment for men (r = 0.38, P < 0.001) compared to women (r = -0.26, P < 0.04); more strongly negatively correlated with mixed (r = -0.39, P < 0.001) and negative (r = -0.46, P < 0.001) sentiment for men compared to women (r = -0.13, P < 0.28) for mixed sentiment (r = -0.22, P < 0.08) for negative; and women were around 11% more likely to receive positive comments alongside lower scores, and negative or mixed comments alongside higher scores. Additionally, on average, men received slightly more positive comments in postgraduate year (PGY)-3 than in PGY-1 and fewer mixed and negative comments, while women received fewer positive and negative comments in PGY-3 than PGY-1 and almost the same number of mixed comments. Conclusion: Women EM residents received more inconsistent evaluations than men EM residents at two levels: 1)inconsistency between numerical scores and sentiment of textual comments; and 2)inconsistency in the expected career trajectory of improvement over time. These findings reveal gender inequality in how attendings evaluate residents and suggest that attendings should be trained to provide all residents with feedback that is clear, consistent, and helpful, regardless of resident gender.

Development and delivery of a higher diploma in emergency medicine and critical care for clinical officers in Kenya

The provision of emergency medicine and critical care in a cost-efficient manner has the potential to address many preventable deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Here, utilising Kern's framework for curriculum development, we describe the origins, development and implementation of the Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Clinical Officer training program; Kenya's first training programme for clinical officers in emergency medicine and critical care. Graduates are scattered across the country in diverse settings, ranging from national referral hospitals in the capital, Nairobi, to rural hospitals in northern Kenya. In these locations, they provide clinical care, leadership, and teaching. Similar programmes could be replicated in other locations to help plug the gap in critical care provision in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Contribution of 15 Years (2007-2022) of Indo-US Training Partnerships to the Emergency Physician Workforce Capacity in India.

Indo-US Masters in Emergency Medicine (MEM) certification courses are rigorous three-year emergency medicine (EM) training courses that operate as a partnership between affiliate hospitals or universities in the United States with established EM training programs and local partner sites in India. Throughout their 15 years of operation, these global training partnerships have contributed to the EM workforce in India. Our objective in this study was to describe Indo-US MEM program graduates, their work environments, and their contribution to the growth of academic EM and to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response. An electronic survey was created by US and Indian MEM course stakeholders and distributed to 714 US-affiliated MEM program graduates. The survey questions investigated where graduates were working, their work environments and involvement in teaching and research, and their involvement in the COVID-19 response. We consolidated the results into three domains: work environment and clinical contribution; academic contribution; and contribution to the COVID-19 response. The survey response rate was 46.9% (335 responses). Most graduates reported working within India (210, 62.7%) and in an emergency department (ED) setting (304, 91.0%). The most common reason for practicing outside of India was difficulty with formal MEM certificate recognition within India (97, 79.5%). Over half of graduates reported dedicating over 25% of their work hours to teaching others about EM (223, 66.6%), about half reported presenting research projects at conferences on the regional, national, or international level (168, 50.5%), and almost all graduates were engaged in treating COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (333, 99.4%). Most graduates agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their overall MEM training (296, 88.4%) and confident in their ability to practice EM (306, 91.6%). Indo-US MEM graduates have made a notable contribution to EM in India through clinical service delivery, teaching, and research, even more essential in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The roles of these graduates should be acknowledged and can contribute further to expand EM specialty and systems development across India.

A scoping and web-based review of current practices and lessons learnt in development and sustainability of global health emergency medicine fellowships

Background: Despite a high perceived interest in advanced global health training among Canadian emergency medicine trainees, only one global health emergency medicine (GHEM) fellowship existed in Canada at the time of this review. We conducted a scoping and web-based review to summarize the components of, and lessons learnt through development and implementation of global health emergency medicine fellowship programs to date, to inform program development. Methods: We conducted a scoping and web-based review by systematically searching electronic databases from inception to 2021 for articles and websites (2022) describing global health emergency medicine training programs based in high income countries. Results: From 2957 articles and 62 websites identified, eight articles and 43 websites were included in the review. Fellowships are generally structured as follows: 1–2 years duration curriculum including clinical skills, and course and field work focused on education, research or administration, funded by fellows’ clinical hours. Details on trainees’ experiences, international work, and program outcomes were lacking. Conclusions: This review highlights the need for information on lessons learnt through development and implementation of GHEM fellowship programs, and experiences and outcomes of trainees to date, to inform program improvements to optimize the benefits of GHEM fellowship training. Registration: Open science framework; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UAH35 February 19th, 2018.