Emergency Medicine Providers Research Articles

Clinical management of active bleeding: what the emergency radiologist needs to know.

Active bleeding is a clinical emergency that often requires swift action driven by efficient communication. Extravasation of intravenous (IV) contrast on computed tomography (CT) is a hallmark of active hemorrhage. This can be seen on exams performed for a variety of indications and can occur anywhere in the body. As both traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies of significant blood loss are clinical emergencies, exams demonstrating active bleeding are often performed in emergency departments and read by emergency radiologists. Prompt communication of these findings to the appropriate emergency medicine and surgical providers is crucial. Although many types of active hemorrhage can be managed by interventional radiology techniques, endoscopic and surgical management or clinical observation may be appropriate in certain cases. To facilitate optimal care, it is important for emergency radiologists to understand the scope of indications for embolization of bleeding by interventional radiologists (IR) and when an IR consultation is warranted. Similarly, timely comprehensive diagnostic radiology reporting including pertinent positive and negative findings tailored for IR colleagues can expedite the appropriate intervention.

Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multi-institutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education.

Previous studies have demonstrated that radiologists and other providers perceive maging to be higher than they actually are. Thus, pregnant patients were less likely to receive ionizing radiation procedures. While it is imperative to minimize fetal radiation exposure, clinicians must remember that diagnostic studies should not be avoided due to fear of radiation, particularly if the imaging study can significantly impact patient care. Although guidelines do exist regarding how best to image pregnant patients, many providers are unaware of these guidelines and thus lack confidence when making imaging decisions for pregnant patients. This study aimed to gather information about current education, confidence in, and knowledge about emergency imaging of pregnant women among radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers. We created and distributed an anonymous survey to radiology, emergency medicine, and OB/GYN providers to evaluate their knowledge and confidence in imaging pregnant patients in the emergent setting. This study included a questionnaire with the intent of knowing the correct answers among physicians primarily across the United States (along with some international participation). We conducted subgroup analyses, comparing variables by specialty, radiology subspecialty, and training levels. Based on the survey results, we subsequently developed educational training videos. 108 radiologists, of which 32 self-identified as emergency radiologists, ten emergency medicine providers and six OB/GYN clinicians completed the survey. The overall correct response rate was 68.5%, though performance across questions was highly variable. Within our 18-question survey, four questions had a correct response rate under 50%, while five questions had correct response rates over 90%. Most responding physicians identified themselves as either "fairly" (58/124, 47%) or "very" (51/124, 41%) confident. Amongst specialties, there were differences in performance concerning the knowledge assessment (p = 0.049), with the strongest performance from radiologists. There were no differences in knowledge by training level (p = 0.4), though confidence levels differed significantly between attending physicians and trainees (p < 0.001). This study highlights deficiencies in knowledge to support appropriate decision-making surrounding the imaging of pregnant patients. Our results indicate the need for improved physician education and dissemination of standardized clinical guidelines.

Comparison of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Guidance and the Traditional Approach in Performing Simulated Emergent Cricothyroidotomy Among Emergency Medicine Physicians, Residents, and Students.

Objective Emergency cricothyroidotomy (EC) is a rare procedure used to establish airway access when both endotracheal intubation and bag-mask ventilation have failed. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been proposed as an adjunct to aid in identifying anatomical landmarks. However, its impact on emergency physicians when performing EC remains unclear. This study compared emergency physician and student confidence, preference, and procedure time between POCUS and traditional palpation for EC. Methods Our study utilized a randomized controlled crossover design. Emergency medicine providers attended a didactic lecture demonstrating traditional palpation and POCUS techniques for EC. The participants were randomly allocated to two simulation groups. One group started with the palpation of landmarks, while the other group started with POCUS landmark identification. A randomized crossover design was employed, and in a subsequent simulation, the reverse technique was utilized. Time to anatomic landmark identification was recorded. Participants completed a survey assessing their confidence and preference. Procedure times and confidence level differences were examined via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results Sixteen participants completed the survey and were included in the final analysis. All participants successfully performed EC with the two landmark identification techniques. There was no significant difference in self-reported confidence between POCUS and palpation (p = 0.17). Landmark identification by palpation was significantly faster than POCUS (p = 0.001). A total of 10 (63%) participants preferred palpation over POCUS. Conclusions Both POCUS and traditional palpation were effective in identifying anatomical landmarks for EC. Although palpation was significantly quicker, confidence and preference between the two techniques were similar. The results suggest that both approaches can benefit clinical practice, depending on the context and provider familiarity. Further studies with larger cohorts and real-world scenarios are recommended to explore the effectiveness and safety of POCUS in EC.

Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers

Background Persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) urgently need improved access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and long-term treatment. Promising options include initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED), telemedicine, and proactive treatment referrals before overdose events. Objective(s) We describe the process and outcomes of a novel referral path utilizing preemptive outreach and telemedicine to facilitate rapid access to MOUD and long-term treatment. Methods Participants were referred to telemedicine appointments with ED providers for buprenorphine initiation and to treatment agencies via an electronic referral network. Administrative data tracked participation at each stage of the process. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests assessed differences in process completion based on demographics. Results 163 persons with OUD or recent opioid overdose were referred, with high rates of participant follow-through, resulting in 126 new buprenorphine prescriptions and 114 linkages to long-term treatment. Of the 163 patients referred, 114 (69.9%) completed all steps. Participant demographics were not associated with significantly different completion rates. Conclusions This model serves as a viable pathway to link people to treatment resources and MOUD, and novelly combines prospective client outreach with telemedicine to reach persons before they arrive in the ED following an overdose. Future studies should examine the impact of similar programs on subsequent opioid use rates and treatment retention.

Healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes about overdose prevention sites in Colorado

BackgroundOverdose prevention sites (OPS) are a harm reduction strategy that offer people who use drugs a variety of resources including but not limited to sterile supplies, linkage to healthcare resources, and intervention if an overdose occurs. OPS operate in over 120 countries and evidence has demonstrated they are an effective harm reduction strategy. Despite their success elsewhere, OPS remain federally illegal in the United States and thus there is limited research on their implementation and outcomes in the United States. This study aimed to identify Colorado healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes about OPS and determine if there is a correlation between healthcare providers with more knowledge about OPS having a more positive attitude about OPS.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to healthcare providers in Colorado. Responses were collected in early 2022 and recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. Mean scores between 1 and 5 were calculated for each participant and analysis of variance methods were used to determine correlating demographic factors. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance of all findings.ResultsThis study included 698 participants. A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) between provider knowledge and attitudes about OPS. Emergency medicine providers scored the highest in mean knowledge and attitude scores in comparison to all other specialties. Respondents affiliated with a harm reduction center exhibited the highest mean knowledge and attitude scores. Mean knowledge and attitude scores generally rose with respondents’ increasing encounters with people who inject drugs in a typical workday, except when reaching nine or more encounters, where a sharp decline occurred.ConclusionsOur study highlights the importance of education, exposure to harm reduction strategies, and inter-specialty collaboration in shaping healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes about OPS. The positive correlation between providers’ knowledge and attitudes about OPS suggests that educating healthcare providers on harm reduction strategies, specifically OPS, may lead to reduced stigmatization of OPS among healthcare professionals.

Family Presence During Resuscitation: Perspectives of Saudi Emergency Medicine Providers.

Background Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been a long-debated topic in medical circles in the last 40 years. Studies usually concentrate on the opinions and responses of the family members of the patients being resuscitated. Only a handful of studies have focussed on the medical practitioner's opinions and beliefs on the topic. Hence, this study aimed to investigate opinions and beliefs regarding FPDR among emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a self-filled, questionnaire-based study conducted among 450 EMPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proportions and subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to gender, experience, and seniority. EMPs were asked about the number of family members they would allow to attend the resuscitation of a patient under their care in different clinical scenarios. Results A total of 392 (87.1%) EMPs participated in this study. Overall, 64% (n = 250) of EMPs reported that they would not allow FPDR in cases that involved trauma, or if the patient being revived was female. This percentage dropped to about 33% (n = 129) when the patient being resuscitated was a child or in out-of-hospital arrest. The majority of EMPs believed that the decision to allow FPDR was the physician's decision (n = 251, 64.8%) and not the right of the family (n = 133, 34.7%). Moreover, emergency medicine board-certified physicians were more likely to allow FPDR in different cases with 19 (18.5%) in adult arrest cases, 18 (18%) in pediatric cases, and 16 (15.1%) in trauma cases, than non-board-certified practitioners (p = 0.001, 0.007, and 0.031, respectively). Female EMPs were more likely to refuse FPDR than their male counterparts (p < 0.001). Conclusions Approximately, 60-70% of EMPs allowed a member of the family to attend the resuscitation of their loved one. However, this percentage dropped in cases where the patient was a female, or the case was a trauma case instead of a medical case. Most Saudi EMPs believed that FPDR hurts the resuscitating team and might hinder the resuscitation efforts.

Improving Coccidioidomycosis Testing for Emergency Department Patients With Suspect Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Analysis of Provider Attitudes and the Effect of a Targeted Intervention.

Coccidioidomycosis is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia in endemic regions. Approximately 20 000 cases of coccidioidomycosis occur annually; however, this statistic is limited by a widespread lack of testing. Here, we analyze emergency medicine provider attitudes toward coccidioidal testing and assess the effect of an intervention to improve testing rates.

Preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation in emergency airway management.

Preoxygenation during the peri-intubation period is now considered a critical aspect of rapid sequence intubation and an important skill for emergency medicine and critical care providers. Peri-intubation hypoxemia carries significant risk, including cardiac arrest, and care must be taken for appropriate management including through apnea and initiation of laryngoscopy. Appropriate selection of preoxygenation devices should depend on underlying physiology to optimize oxygenation prior to intubation attempts. A PubMed MEDLINE search was completed with selection of articles from March 2008 to March 2023 describing various techniques for preoxygenation for intubation in the critical care and operating room setting with pregnant and obese patient populations included. Prehospital and pediatric populations were excluded in this review. This review provides an overview of methods of preoxygenation with their clinical indications as well as methods for determining end points to preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation. An overview of approaches to preoxygenation was included for patients considered to have a physiologically difficult airway and obese and pregnant patient populations.

Current diagnosis and management of necrotizing soft tissue infections: What you need to know.

Necrotizing soft tissue infections are rare bacterial infections of the skin and soft tissues with a high morbidity and mortality rate, requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. These represent a spectrum of disease resulting in tissue necrosis that is rapidly progressive; however, they remain a diagnostic challenge because the average surgeon or emergency medicine provider may only see one or two over the course of their career. Diagnosis is largely clinical and based on subtle physical examination findings, physiologic instability, and laboratory derangements. Aids to diagnosis such as scoring systems and cross-sectional imaging may be used; however, the findings are not specific, so management should not be based on these alone. The most common cause of necrotizing soft tissue infection is polymicrobial infection; however, specific bacteria such as clostridial species, group A streptococcal, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and aquatic bacteria may also be causative. Initial management includes broad spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation for severe sepsis, and early aggressive surgical debridement. Often, these patients require multiple operative debridement to achieve source control, and a low threshold for repeat debridement should be maintained because these infections can progress rapidly. Once source control is achieved, patients may be left with extensive wounds requiring multidisciplinary care and wound management. Necrotizing infections have long been viewed based on mortality outcomes alone because of their rarity and severity. Over recent years, more reports have shown a decrease in the mortality rates from those previously reported, allowing for a focus on methods to improve morbidity of these infections.

Revisiting dexamethasone use in the pediatric emergency department.

Dexamethasone is an essential treatment for common pediatric inflammatory, airway, and respiratory conditions. We aim to provide up-to-date recommendations for treatment of anaphylaxis, croup, coronavirus disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and asthma with dexamethasone for use in the pediatric emergency department. Literature largely continues to support the use of dexamethasone in most of the above conditions, however, recommendations for dosing and duration are evolving. The findings discussed in this review will enable pediatric emergency medicine providers to use dexamethasone effectively as treatment of common pediatric conditions and minimize the occurrence of side-effects caused by gratuitous corticosteroid use.

Pediatric Polytrauma Fire Victim Simulation.

Pediatric trauma has long been one of the primary contributors to pediatric mortality. There are multiple cases in the literature involving cyanide (CN) toxicity, carbon monoxide (CO) toxicity, and smoke inhalation with thermal injury, but none in combination with mechanical trauma. In this 45-minute simulation case, emergency medicine residents and fellows were asked to manage a pediatric patient with multiple life-threatening traumatic and metabolic concerns after being extracted from a van accident with a resulting fire. Providers were expected to identify and manage the patient's airway, burns, hemoperitoneum, and CO and CN toxicities. Forty learners participated in this simulation, the majority of whom had little prior clinical experience managing the concepts highlighted in it. All agreed or strongly agreed that the case was relevant to their work. After participation, learner confidence in the ability to manage each of the learning objectives was high. One hundred percent of learners felt confident or very confident in managing CO toxicity and completing primary and secondary surveys, while 97% were similarly confident in identifying smoke inhalation injury, preparing for a difficult airway, and managing CN toxicity. This case was a well-received teaching tool for the management of pediatric trauma and metabolic derangements related to fire injuries. While this specific case represents a rare clinical experience, it is within the scope of expected knowledge for emergency medicine providers and offers the opportunity to practice managing multisystem trauma.

Hyperammonemia in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Hyperammonemia is a serious clinical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the pediatric population, this is often caused by urea cycle disorders, acute liver failure, or other less common underlying etiologies. Children and teens with hyperammonemia can have a broad range of clinical findings, including vomiting, respiratory distress, and changes in mental status. As ammonia levels worsen, this presentation can progress to respiratory failure, encephalopathy, cerebral edema, seizures, and death. Given the risk of neurologic damage, timely identification and management of hyperammonemia is critical and includes initial resuscitation, early consultation with subspecialists, and initiation of appropriate therapies. It is important for pediatric emergency medicine providers to understand the clinical findings, causes, diagnosis, and management of hyperammonemia because they play a key role in the provision of effective, multidisciplinary care of these patients.

Inappropriate Pediatric Orthopaedic Emergency Department Transfers: A Burden on the Health Care System.

Though the importance of level 1 pediatric trauma has repeatedly been shown to lessen both morbidity and mortality in critically injured children, these same tertiary referral centers also receive numerous transfers of patients with less severe injuries. This not only leads to increased costs and use of limited facility resources but, oftentimes, frustration and unnecessary expense to those families for whom transfer was avoidable. Prior work has demonstrated that half of all inappropriate pediatric interfacility transfers are due to orthopedic injuries. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of inappropriate transfers of pediatric patients with isolated orthopedic injuries to a pediatric level 1 trauma center and identify factors associated with such transfers. All patients transferred to a large metropolitan level 1 pediatric trauma center for isolated orthopedic injuries over a 6-year period were retrospectively evaluated. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and injury data, including age, gender, race, social deprivation index, insurance status, location of transferring institution, timing of transfer, and availability of orthopedic on-call coverage at transferring institution. The transfer was deemed to be appropriate if the patient required a sedated reduction, was admitted to the hospital, or was taken to the operating room within 24 hours of transfer. Regression analysis was reviewed for each of the demographic, patient, and transfer characteristics in an attempt to isolate those associated with inappropriate transfer. In all, 437 transfers occurred during the study period. Of these, 112 (26%) were deemed inappropriate. 4% of patients transferred for orthopedic injuries did not receive an orthopedic consult following the transfer. Non-white patients were more likely than white patients to be transferred inappropriately (34.01% vs. 21.58%, P=0.009 ). No other demographic characteristic was predictive of inappropriate transfer. There was no difference in the rate of appropriate transfer between patients with private insurance versus government-funded, self-paying, or uninsured patients. The timing of transfer (night vs. day and weekday vs. weekend) did not affect the appropriateness of transfer. Facilities with orthopaedic on-call coverage were more likely to inappropriately transfer patients than those without (26.6% vs. 23.4%, P<0.001 ). A quarter of patients transferred for isolated orthopaedic injuries were inappropriately transferred. Unlike studies published in adult literature, the timing of transfer (overnight and weekend) and the insurance status of the patient did not appear to play a role in the appropriateness of transfer. Inappropriate and unnecessary trauma transfers create a significant burden on tertiary referral centers. Raising awareness of the high incidence of unnecessary transfers coupled with enhanced education of outside emergency medicine providers may result in better stewardship of health care resources, limit delays in patient care, and reduce strain on both the health care delivery system and the families of injured children. Level III-Therapeutic Study.

Assessing Provider Understanding of Interfacility Emergency Medical Services Transport

Background: Interfacility transfer between hospitals is an integral component of regional healthcare systems. The decisions referring providers make regarding emergency medical services (EMS) level of care and transport modality (ground versus air) can dramatically impact patient care, emergency departments' workflow, hospital length of stay, and EMS resource availability. Limited research has been done to assess understanding of interfacility transport by emergency medicine providers. &#x0D; Methods: We developed six patient scenarios to test knowledge of level of care and mode of interfacility transfer. Seven board-certified EMS physicians determined the optimal answer to each patient scenario. We distributed a survey with the scenarios to regional healthcare partners via a database of persons who utilize or interface with interfacility transport services. We collected answers to the patient scenarios and provider characteristics (primary practice site, sex, age, specialty, years since graducation, provider degree, EMS training received). Descriptive statistics were performed and Fisher's exact tests described differences in correct answers as they varied by specialty (emergency medicine or other specialty), provider type (physician or advanced practice provider), and reported training in EMS level of care. &#x0D; Results: Seventy-six emergency medicine providers responded, including 68 physicians and 8 advanced practice providers. The mean total score on the case scenarios was 66%, with scores ranging from 33% to 100%. The mean scores on questions testing level of care and transport modality were 67% and 70%, respectively. No significant difference was found in test scores between emergency medicine and other specialties (p=0.718) or provider level of training (p=0.799). Training in EMS level of care was correlated with higher scores on the transport modality questions (p=0.003) but not on the level of care questions (p=0.231).&#x0D; Conclusion: Variability exists in the knowledge of providers on interfacility transport throughout the state. Emergency medicine providers could benefit from education on interfacility transfer resources.

Management of Children With Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency and Hospital Settings.

The aim of the study is to establish consensus recommendations on features used to determine the route of antibiotic administration and disposition for children with uncomplicated cellulitis. Modified Delphi methodology was performed with 2 rounds of confidential surveys of Emergency medicine and hospital medicine (HM) providers at Lurie Children's Hospital to assess cellulitis management in children (ages 6 months-18 years) without signs of sepsis or abscess formation. Using a 9-point Likert scale, emergency medicine providers ranked features by perceived level of importance when deciding initial antibiotic route and HM providers ranked features on importance when transitioning to oral antibiotics. Responses were grouped as not important (1-3), neutral (4-6), and important (7-9) and re-evaluated in the second round to reach consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement. Emergency medicine providers (n = 17) reached consensus on 15 of 16 features (93.8%), 10 deemed important. Participants reached greatest consensus (100%) on fevers/chills, lymphangitis, and functional impairment as considerations for initiating intravenous antibiotics. HM providers (n = 15) reached consensus on 9 of 11 factors (81.8%), with 7 considered important when deciding on readiness for oral antibiotics. Providers indicated that stability, rather than reduction, of erythematous margins is sufficient to consider transition and de-escalation of therapy at less than 24 hours if all other clinical improvement criteria are met. This study achieved consensus on important features for treatment and disposition of children with uncomplicated cellulitis in both emergency and inpatient contexts. These features have the potential to aid in decision making and improve standardization of clinical practice.

1670. It Is Likely Not HSV: Decreasing Empiric Acyclovir Use In Low-Risk Infants

Abstract Background Neonatal HSV infection is a rare but potentially devastating disease. Institutional practices regarding which neonates must be treated empirically with acyclovir varies. While some centers elect to treat all neonates presenting with fever or hypothermia, some treat only those considered at risk. Our goal was to decrease empiric acyclovir use in low-risk neonates admitted to the Infectious Disease (ID) ward. Methods Quality improvement initiative aimed to decrease acyclovir exposure in neonates 15 to 28 days old hospitalized on the ID ward for fever/hypothermia without a focus, risk factors, or clinical signs for HSV (Figure 1). Interventions included development of a risk stratification algorithm (Figure 2), consensus building among Emergency Medicine and ID providers, and order set implementation. We reviewed all neonates with HSV infections for delayed acyclovir initiation as a balancing measure. The pre-study baseline period was 2019 to 2020, and the study period was 2020, to March 31, 2023. Control charts were used to assess the interventions.Figure 1Key Driver Diagram.Figure 2Risk stratification algorithm for HSV empiric treatment in low-risk infants. Results The mean acyclovir use per quarter in neonates who met low risk criteria decreased from 79% during the baseline period (7/2019-6/2020) to 30% in the post-intervention period (7/2020-3/2023) (p = &amp;lt; 0.0001) (Figure 3). Most common reasons why patients failed low risk criteria were: CSF pleocytosis in the setting of a traumatic LP, minimally abnormal lab values (slightly increased ALT, slightly decreased platelets), no LP in well-appearing patient and alternative fever etiology (URI symptoms with positive respiratory infection array). There were no cases of delayed acyclovir initiation in patients with HSV disease. Only one patient with HSV disease fell within the age range but was admitted to the ICU following cardiac arrest and appropriately started on acyclovir therapy.Figure 3Control chart of empiric acyclovir use in low-risk infants. Conclusion Our algorithm, targeted to limit empiric acyclovir therapy in neonates with fever/hypothermia without a focus at low risk for HSV, led to a significant decrease in acyclovir exposure sustained for &amp;gt; 2 years after implementation. Interestingly, it also led to decreased in acyclovir use in patients who failed low risk criteria, but this did not result in missed diagnosis of HSV disease, likely because our algorithm was conservative and HSV infection is rare. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

23 Pilot Testing the Feasibility of Wearable Devices and Ecological Momentary Assessments Among Emergency Medicine Providers

23 Pilot Testing the Feasibility of Wearable Devices and Ecological Momentary Assessments Among Emergency Medicine Providers

131 Addressing Palliative Medicine Knowledge Gaps Amongst Emergency Medicine Providers: A Quality Improvement Project

131 Addressing Palliative Medicine Knowledge Gaps Amongst Emergency Medicine Providers: A Quality Improvement Project

Inhalational Injury Secondary to House Fire.

This scenario was developed to educate emergency medicine residents on the diagnosis and management of patients with an inhalational airway injury secondary to a house fire. Burn injuries are a common occurrence encountered by the emergency physician. According to the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, around 371,000 patients were treated in emergency departments for fire or burn injuries across the United States in 2020. This represents around 1% of emergency department visits related to injury, poisoning, or adverse effects.1 One of the most dangerous and time critical aspects of managing severely burned patients is inhalation injury. Inhalation injury is a relatively vague term which may refer to pulmonary exposure to a wide range of chemicals in various forms. In the context of burn patients, this is most often smoke exposure. It is critical that the emergency medicine provider rapidly identifies the potential for an inhalational injury in order to determine the need for definitive airway management. It is also important that the provider has the necessary skills and systematic approach to manage what is likely to be a difficult airway. Furthermore, providers must then have the knowledge of how to best manage and resuscitate these severely burned patients post-intubation. At the conclusion of the simulation session, learners will be able to: 1) recognize the indications for intubation in a thermal burn/inhalation injury patient; 2) develop a systematic approach to an inhalational injury airway; and 3) recognize indications for transfer to burn center. This session was conducted using high-fidelity simulation, followed by a debriefing session and lecture on the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and management of inhalational airway injury secondary to a house fire. Debriefing methods may be left to the discretion of participants, but the authors have utilized advocacy-inquiry techniques. This scenario may also be run as an oral board case. Our residents are provided a survey at the completion of the debriefing session so they may rate different aspects of the simulation, as well as provide qualitative feedback on the scenario. The local institution's simulation center's electronic feedback form is based on the Center of Medical Simulation's Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Student Version Short Form2 with the inclusion of required qualitative feedback if an element was scored less than a 6 or 7. Nine learners completed a feedback form. This session received all 6 & 7 scores (consistently effective/very good and extremely effective/outstanding, respectively) other than one isolated 5 score. This is a cost-effective method for reviewing inhalational airway injury diagnosis and management. The case may be modified for targeted audiences, expected resources, and learning objectives, such as removal of a bronchoscope availability in settings which are expected to be resource-limited. Some readers may choose to focus on other aspects of burn management instead of airway securement such as cyanide and/or carbon monoxide toxicity. We encourage readers to limit the number of learning objectives because airway algorithms and troubleshooting for this scenario was a rich, stand-alone debriefing. There was not enough time to review in detail all nuanced aspects of the burned patient, including: Lund-Browder versus rule of 9's, modified Brooke versus Parkland formulas, indications for and completion of escharotomies, and/or identification and treatment of cyanide and carbon monoxide toxicity. Medical simulation, burns, airway emergencies, emergency medicine.

42 “Baby Box”: Neonatal Resuscitation Box With Asynchronous Training Improves Emergency Medicine Provider Preparedness for Precipitous Delivery

42 “Baby Box”: Neonatal Resuscitation Box With Asynchronous Training Improves Emergency Medicine Provider Preparedness for Precipitous Delivery