Emergency Medicine Programs Research Articles

Development and Implementation of a Value-Based Care Telehealth Emergency Medicine Program: Triage and Care Alignment in an Integrated Health System

Background: Acute unscheduled episodic care is an area of potential cost savings, given the high frequency and cost of unnecessary emergency department (ED) utilization. Methods: We developed a provider-assisted patient navigation program using a telehealth platform designed to decrease ED utilization and reduce costs while providing exceptional patient satisfaction. Results: Urgent care (UC) visits were analyzed from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023. The “ED comparison” group (n = 68,320) consisted of patients discharged to home after receiving care in the ED. The “avoided ED visits” group included patients (n = 7,430) who received care in a lower-acuity setting and did not require emergency services within 48 hours. The calculated overall medical expense savings comparing the costs between the ED vs. lower-acuity settings revealed that 50% (n = 450) of consultations were managed as outpatients, avoiding ED visits. Evaluation of distribution by source revealed that 67% of ConnectCare consults resulted in admission, 48% for UC, while 36% of patients were service center consults. Conversely, 31% of consultations resulted in recommendations to go to the ED, and 16% of these were assisted transfers where the Telehealth Emergency Medicine (TeleEM) clinician communicated with the receiving ED. Among the 280 patients directed to the ED, 243 were sent because of immediate clinical acuity, 28 were because of logistical or scheduling issues, three for non-qualifying insurance for outpatient workup, and six were redirected to the ED following diagnostic results. Our analysis suggests an estimated average avoided medical expense of $1,701 per case to insurers and patients if an ED visit was avoided. Conclusion: Implementing a TeleEM program to assist with triage and resource alignment, as well as identification and outpatient management of patients while avoiding an ED visit, is feasible within an integrated health system. Our TeleEM program may be a model for other integrated health systems.

Emergency Medicine Clerkship Grading Scheme, Grade, and Rank-List Distribution as Reported on Standardized Letters of Evaluation

Background: The Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) is a crucial component of the emergency medicine (EM) application process. Given the critical role of the SLOE, we attempted to better understand the grading scales used, as well as the distribution of grades and rank-list positions.Objectives: Our primary objective in this study was to determine the distribution of grading formats, grades given, and rank-list positions across EM clerkships using the SLOE. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of the grading formats, grades given, and ranking distributions as reported on the SLOE during the 2022–23 application cycle. We obtained data on SLOEs from EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education by reviewing all applicants who applied to either of two EM residency programs in geographically different regions. Trained abstractors recorded the following data: number of students rotating in the prior year; grading format used; and grade and rank distribution among students. Results: We included 264 programs in our final analysis, after 13 programs met exclusion criteria. The majority of programs (72.2%) use an Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme. We determined the mean percent of each grade: Honors/A 27.6%; High Pass/B 31.1%; Pass/C 40.8%; Low Pass/D 0.2%; and Fail/F 0.3%. Finally, we determined the mean percent for each rank-list position: top 10% was 17.6%; top third 36.5%; mid third 34.1%; and low third 11.8%. Conclusion: We determined the grading schemes and grade and rank-list distributions for EM programs during the 2022–2023 academic year. Most programs used a Honors/High Pass/Pass/Fail grading scheme, with the majority of students receiving Honors or High Pass, while 0.3% failed their rotation. Both grades and rank list demonstrated evidence of a skewed distribution toward higher grades and rank-list position.

Telesimulation Use in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: National Survey of Residency Simulation Leaders

Introduction: Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) accelerated the need for virtual learning including telesimulation. Many emergency medicine (EM) programs halted in-person simulation and trialed telesimulation, but specifics on its utilization and plans for future use are unknown. Telesimulation has been defined as “a process by which telecommunication and simulation resources are utilized to provide education, training, and/or assessment to learners at an off-site location.” Our objective in this study was to describe the patterns of telesimulation usage in EM residency programs during COVID-19-induced learning restrictions as well as its anticipated future utility. Methods: We identified EM simulation leaders via the EMRA Match website, institutional websites, or personal contact with residency coordinators and directors, and invited them to participate by email. Participants completed a confidential, web-based survey consisting of multiple-choice items and one free-response question, developed by our study team with consideration of survey research best practices and Messick’s validity framework. We collected data between January–February 2022. We calculated descriptive statistics for multiple-choice items and examined the free-response answers for common themes. Results: We obtained contact information for simulation leaders at 139 EM residency programs. Survey response rate was 65% (91/139). During in-person restrictions, 62% (56/91) of programs used telesimulation. Assuming all restrictions lifted, 38% (34/90) of respondents planned to continue to use telesimulation, compared to 9% (8/91) using telesimulation before COVID-19. Most respondents planned to use telesimulation for medical knowledge (26/34, 76%) and communication/teamwork-focused cases (23/34, 68%). In response to the free-response question regarding experience with and plans for use, we identified three major themes: 1) telesimulation is a valuable alternative to in-person learning; 2) telesimulation is an option for learners unable to participate in person; and 3) telesimulation is challenging for procedural education. Conclusion: Despite the relatively limited use of telesimulation in EM residencies prior to COVID-19, an increased number of programs have plans to continue incorporating telesimulation into their curricula. This plan for continued use opens opportunities for further innovation and scholarship within simulation education.

T32 programs in emergency medicine: A report from the ACEP-SAEM Federal Research Funding Workgroup.

Advancing care in Emergency Medicine (EM) requires the development of well-trained researchers, but our specialty has lower amounts of research funding compared to similar medical fields. Increasing the number of pathways available for research training supports the growth of new investigators. To address the need for more EM researchers, the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians convened a Federal Research Funding Workgroup. Here, we report the workgroup recommendations regarding the creation of Research Training Fellowships using the T32 grant structure sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. After reviewing the history of NIH-grant supported research fellowships in EM, we outline the rationale and describe the core components of T32-supported research fellowships, including program design, fellow evaluation, and recruitment considerations.

Silver Fast Track – Prioritising People Over 75 in the Emergency Department (ED)

Abstract Background The National Emergency Medicine Programme prioritised the care of older adults in a three-year Unscheduled Care Improvement Programme, coinciding with the “Integrated NCAGL Acute Operations and Older Persons body of work on Older Adults with Frailty in Acute hospitals”. In May 2023 a three-month pilot in the ED commenced to reduce the time for people over the age of 75 awaiting assessment by a doctor. Using the Manchester Triage system, a separate filing box on triage (Category 3+) was created to identify all people aged over 75 years who would then be prioritised to be seen within 4 hours of arrival. In addition, if a person aged over 75 years was waiting over 4 hours to be seen they would be re-triaged and seen within 15 minutes (Category 2). Methods A Prospective analysis of waiting times for people aged over 75 years, assessing: (1) time to be assessed by the Older Persons Assessment and Liaison (OPAL) Team; (2) time to see the ED doctor and (3) time to discharge. Results Four months prior to commencement, the median time from arrival to be seen by OPAL was 10 hours 58 mins. Following commencement, for the remainder of 2023, the median time from arrival to seen by OPAL was 6 hours 36 mins. The time to see the doctor reduced by 49 mins and time to discharge reduced by 1 hour 19 minutes. Conclusion The category 3+ for patients aged over 75 years is now an established feature in the ED. It has enabled the OPAL team to undertake earlier assessment of the patients journey alongside the medical team ensuring a more collaborative discharge pathway. In the future, we hope to further reduce the time to be assessed by OPAL through the introduction of clinical frailty scoring at ED triage & expanding the team.

Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: The 2022-2023 Program Director Experience.

Program signaling (PS), which enables residency applicants to signal their preference for a specific program, was introduced in emergency medicine (EM) in the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. In this study we evaluated EM program directors' (PD) utilization of PS in application review and ranking. This study also explores the relationship between program characteristics and number of signals received as well as the relative importance and utilization of signals related to the number of signals received. This is an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study of PDs at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited EM residency programs. We used descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of residency programs and practices around PS. Measures of central tendency and dispersion summarized continuous variables. We used chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test for comparisons between groups for categorical variables. Comparisons for continuous variables were made using the t-test for independent samples or analysis of variance. The response rate was 41% (n = 113/277 EM programs). Most programs participated in PS (n = 261/277 EM programs, 94.2%). Mean number of signals received was 60 (range 2-203). Signals received varied based on program characteristics including geographic location and program type, duration, environment, and longevity. Most used PS in holistic review (52.2%), but other uses varied by proportion of applications that were signaled. The importance of PS in application review (mean 2.9; 1-5 scale, 1 = not important, 5 = extremely important) and rank list preparation (2.1) was relatively low compared to other application elements such as standardized letters of evaluation (4.97 for review, 4.90 for ranking). The study provides insights into PS utilization in EM's inaugural year. We have identified patterns of signal use based on program characteristics and number of signals received that can inform signal allocation and utilization on an individual applicant and program level. A more nuanced understanding of signal use can provide valuable insight as the specialty of EM grapples with fluctuations in its applicant numbers and shifting demographics of its applicant pool.

Making A Difference: Launching a Multimodal, Resident-Run Social Emergency Medicine Program.

Social medicine seeks to incorporate patients' social contexts into their medical care. Emergency physicians are uniquely positioned to address social determinants of health (SDoH) on the frontlines of the healthcare system. Miami-Dade County (MDC) is a diverse and socially vulnerable area. In 2020, the University of Miami-Jackson Health System (UM-JHS) emergency medicine (EM) residency program launched a multimodal, resident-led Social EM program to identify and address SDoH in the emergency department (ED). We use a four-pillar approach to SDoH in the ED: Curriculum Integration; Community Outreach; Access to Care; and Social Justice. Residents graduate with a knowledge of Social EM principles through an 18-month curriculum, an elective, and a longitudinal track. We developed sustainable initiatives through interdepartmental and community-based partnerships, including a Narcan distribution initiative, an ED-based program linking uninsured patients to follow-up care, a human trafficking education initiative, and a quality improvement initiative for incarcerated patients. Given that the 18-month curriculum was launched in 2022, a full rotation of the curriculum had not been completed as of this writing, and data collection and analysis is an ongoing process. The initial pretest and post-test survey data show improvement in knowledge and confidence in managing Social EM topics. The Narcan initiative has screened 1,188 patients, of whom 144 have received Narcan. The ED-based patient navigation program has enrolled 31 patients to date, 18 of whom obtained outpatient care. Analysis of the impact/effectiveness of the program's other initiatives is ongoing. To our knowledge, this is one of the most robust social EM programs to date, as many other programs primarily focus on service opportunities. Rooted in the revised principles of Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive learning, this program moves beyond understanding Social EM tenets to generating solutions to address SDoH in and outside the ED.

The Effects of a Structured Resiliency Program on Indicators of Burnout in Medical Residents

Because of the well documented burnout and stress experienced by medical residents, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education (ACGME) has directed training programs to address these issues in their residents. The current study describes a resiliency enhancement program administered to residents from differing residencies. Method: Residents received group-based sessions focusing on awareness of stress reactions, mindfulness, cognitive coping skills and balancing life and work. All sessions were interactive. The training occurred over a 9-month time span. Residents provided informed consent so that data could be collected. The percentage of burnout was calculated based on one indicator (high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalization, or low personal accomplishment using the Maslach Burnout Scale). Standardized assessment instruments were administered at the beginning (September) and the end of the program (May) to assess the impact of the intervention. Residents were in training at a medium-sized academic medical center. They came from urology, internal medicine, emergency medicine and neurology training programs. Eighteen female and 51 male residents participated. Results: Baseline rates of burnout were as follows: urology residents, 89%; internal medicine, 73%; neurology, 50%; emergency medicine, 22%. There was a significant decrease in perceived stress for the overall group following the intervention. Residents who significantly improved on mindfulness measures also showed significant improvement on resiliency, stress, and personal accomplishment scores. Residents who significantly lowered perceived stress also lowered emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and increased resiliency and compassion satisfaction. Discussion: This study demonstrated that a resiliency enhancement program and data collection after IRB approval is feasible and effective during medical residency. Based on our analysis, mindfulness, and cognitive skills to reduce perceptions of stress seem to be critical components. Future research is necessary to identify elements of the program most relevant to specific residencies.

Identified Needs in Pediatric Education for Emergency Medicine Physicians: A Qualitative Analysis.

General emergency medicine (EM) physicians provide most pediatric emergency care in the United States, yet EM physicians feel underprepared to manage pediatric emergencies. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education during EM residency is variable, and learner preferences regarding educational experiences have not been widely explored through a qualitative lens. We aimed to better describe EM physicians' PEM educational needs and preferred teaching methods. In 2021, as part of a survey querying senior EM residents and recent graduates from 8 diverse EM programs regarding perceived preparedness for PEM emergencies, educational needs and content delivery methods were assessed using 2 free-text questions. Qualitative analysis included deidentification and iterative coding of the data with double coding of 100% of the comments. We performed conventional content analysis of responses to identify emerging themes. The overall response rate for the survey was 53% (N = 129 out of 242 eligible participants) with 84 distinct free-text responses. Major themes included: 1) desire for education regarding neonates, infants, and critically ill children, especially airway management and 2) need for help translating lessons from PEM rotations to community EM practice. Respondents desired more autonomy during training. Their preferred PEM educational modality was simulation, and they appreciated online clinical pathways for just-in-time decision support. This qualitative study of EM physicians proximal to training adds to a prior needs assessment by describing in detail desired pediatric content and preferred delivery. The findings can be used to better inform the development of PEM curricula for this group of EM physicians.

Comparison of dental force applied during endotracheal intubation with hyper-angulated and macintosh-type video laryngoscopy blades used by emergency medicine trainees: A randomized cross-over manikin study.

This study aimed to compare the effects of Macintosh-type and hyperangulated video laryngoscopy (VL) blades on dental force during endotracheal intubation (ETI) using Glidescope and McGrath VL devices. In this randomized, crossover, manikin study conducted at a university emergency medicine (EM) program, 65 EM trainees included interns and residents performed 520 intubations using four different VL blades (GlideScope VL with Macintosh-type Mac T3 and hyperangular Lo Pro T3 blades and McGrath VL Macintosh-type MAC 4 and hyperangular McGrath X3 blades) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The primary outcome of this study was the dental pressure (Newton) exerted during ETI. The secondary outcomes included c-spine motion (degree), intubation success (%), duration (seconds), successful glottic view (%), and intubator comfort (7-point Likert). Significant differences were observed in dental force (H(3) = 11.7, P = 0.008), c-spine motion (H(3) = 8.34, P = 0.039), duration (H(3) = 16.56, P = 0.001), and comfort (H(3) = 174.96, P < 0.001) across blade types. Glidescope LoPro T3 provided a significant lower dental force (adjusted P = 0.01), less c-spine motion (adjusted P = 0.031), and shorter intubation duration (adj P < 0.01) than the McGrath Mac 4. First attempt success and intubator comfort were significantly better with all Glidescope blades (z score of 3.7 and 4.7) than with McGrath blades (z score of-4.1 and-4.4). The Glidescope LoPro T3 blade demonstrated advantages in dental force, c-spine motion, and intubation duration compared with McGrath Mac 4. Overall, the Glidescope blades provided superior comfort and higher first attempt success rates.

Residency training programs in anesthesiology, intensive care and emergency medicine: from curriculum to practice.

Residency programs in anesthesiology and intensive care (AIC), and emergency medicine (EM) continually evolve to ensure well-prepared trainees for these critical fields of healthcare. The objective of this study was to collect comprehensive feed-back from AIC and EM residents, comprising opinions and attitudes on: curriculum and structure of the residency program; scope of training environment, opportunities and complexity; training guidance and mentorship; teaching approach. An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted among AIC and EM trainees during December 2023-January 2024 and June 2023-July 2023, respectively. Two hundred and thirty-five answers were collected: 137 (73/64 female/male) and 98 (55/43 female/male) respondents from the AIC and EM programs, respectively. Overall feed-back was equivalent for both residency programs, with differences related to the distinct characteristics of each medical specialty. The main issues identified across the programs were the need to improve and diversify the teaching approaches, with trainees' strong desire for more professional guidance, mentoring, and constant feed-back. The findings would inform decision-making beyond current residency programs in these critical care specialties, highlighting the need to design solutions for interactive and highly immersive educational experiences, such as simulation, augmented reality or virtual reality.

Sued, Subpoenaed or Sworn in: Use of a Flipped-Classroom Style Medicolegal Workshop for Emergency Medicine Residents.

It is an unfortunate truth that Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians will, at some point, have contact with the medicolegal system. However, most EM residency training programs lack education on the legal system in their curriculum, leaving EM physicians unprepared for litigation. To fill this gap, we designed a high-yield and succinct medical legal workshop highlighting legal issues commonly encountered by EM physicians. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this curriculum by measuring pre and post knowledge questions. A two-hour session included a case-based discussion of common misconceptions held by physicians about the legal system, proper steps when interacting with the legal system and review of legal documents. This session was developed with the involvement of our hospital legal counsel and discussed real encounters. The effectiveness of the session was determined using pre- and post-session surveys assessing participant knowledge and comfort approaching the scenarios. A total of 34 EM residents had the opportunity to complete this workshop as a part of their conference curriculum. A total of 26 participants completed the pre-survey and 19 participants completed the post-survey. No participants had previous training in the legal aspects of medicine, including handling a subpoena, serving as a witness, or giving a deposition. The pre-survey demonstrated that there was significant uncertainty surrounding the processes, definitions, and the legal system interaction. Many participants stated they would not know what to do if they received a subpoena (85.71%), were called as a witness in a trial (96.43%) or receive correspondence from a lawyer (96.43%). The post survey revealed an increased knowledge base and confidence following the session. 100% of residents reported knowing what to do after receiving a subpoena, being called as a witness and understanding the process involved in giving a deposition. All residents reported that the session was beneficial and provided crucial information. EM residents have limited baseline understanding of how to approach common legal scenarios. Educational materials available for this curriculum topic are limited. Based on the rapid knowledge increase observed in our residents, we believe our workshop could be adapted for use at other residency programs.

Using the Novel Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool: A Feasibility Study.

Background and objective While musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders account for a significant number of primary care and emergency department (ED) visits, there are widely recognized shortcomings and gaps in MSK education throughout medical training. Undergraduate medical education (UME) frequently fails to impart clinically relevant MSK knowledge, while many emergency medicine (EM) residency graduates report feeling unprepared to manage MSK complaints. Existing MSK assessments are not tailored to EM and may inaccurately assess specialty-specific MSK knowledge. The novel validated Musculoskeletal Emergency Medicine Assessment Tool (MEAT) holds great promise in standardizing EM MSK knowledge assessment. This trial of feasibility was conducted to assess the viability and practicality of using MEAT to evaluate MSK knowledge among incoming resident physicians in EM programs. Methods This feasibility study involved 21 incoming EM resident physicians from two programs at a single institution. MEAT was administered online during orientation, and demographic data and survey metadata were collected. UME MSK education details were obtained, and MEAT scores were analyzed. Results Participants reported no difficulties in accessing or understanding the 50-question online MEAT, resulting in a 100% response rate. The average pretest score for all interns was 29.9, with a median of 30. Most participants had documented UME MSK education, but curricular content varied widely. The participants took an average of 32 minutes to complete the assessment. Conclusions MEAT demonstrated successful implementation and high response rates, suggesting a high level of feasibility. Thetool can be used to assess baseline MSK knowledge and ultimately track progression during residency with the potential for evaluating educational interventions once further validation studies have been performed.Further adoption of MEAT across multiple EM residency programs will help to enhance the tool's generalizability.

Training labor and treatment behavior: Evidence from physician residency programs.

Public and private investments in physician human capital support a healthcare workforce to provide future medical services nationwide. Yet, little is known about how introducing training labor influences hospitals' provision of care. We leverage all-payer data and emergency medicine (EM) and obstetrics (OBGYN) residency program debuts to estimate local access and treatment intensity effects. We find that the introduction of EM programs coincides with less treatment intensity and suggestive increases in throughput. OBGYN programs adopt the pre-existing surgical tendencies of the hospital but may also relax some capacity constraints-allowing the marginal mother to avoid a riskier nearby hospital.

Geographic Location and Corporate Ownership of Hospitals in Relation to Unfilled Positions in the 2023 Emergency Medicine Match.

In the 2023 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) match, there were 554 unfilled emergency medicine (EM) positions before the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP). We sought to describe features of EM programs that participated in the match and the association between select program characteristics and unfilled positions. The primary outcome measures included the proportion of positions filled in relation to state and population density, hospital ownership type, and physician employment model. Secondary outcome measures included comparing program-specific attributes between filled and unfilled programs, including original accreditation type, year of original accreditation, the total number of approved training positions, length of training, urban-rural designation, hospital size by number of beds, resident-to-bed ratio, and the percentage of disproportionate share patients seen. The NRMP Match had 276 unique participating EM programs with 554 unfilled positions. Six states offered 52% of the total NRMP positions available. Five states were associated with two-thirds of the unfilled positions. Public hospitals had a statistically significant higher match rate (88%) when compared to non-profit and for-profit hospitals, which had match rates of 80% and 75%, respectively (P < 0.001). Programs with faculty employed by a health system had the highest match rate of 87%, followed by clinician partnerships at 79% and private equity groups at 68% (P < 0.001 overall and between all subgroups). The 2023 match in EM saw increased rates in the number of residency positions and programs that did not fill before the SOAP. Public hospitals had higher match rates than for-profit or non-profit hospitals. Residency programs that employed academic faculty through the hospital or health system were associated with higher match rates.

Is boarding compromising our residents' education? A national survey of emergency medicine program directors.

Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described. We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses. A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting "a little," "a moderate amount," "a lot," and "a great deal," respectively, and 5% noting "no effect at all." Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a "somewhat positive" effect. Most noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a "somewhat" or "extremely negative" impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a "somewhat" or "extremely positive" effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing. Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.

Heard it Through the Grapevine: Emergency Medicine Program and Resident Perspectives on the Match

Heard it Through the Grapevine: Emergency Medicine Program and Resident Perspectives on the Match

Distribution of grades and rank lists among Emergency Medicine programs during the 2022-2023 academic year

Distribution of grades and rank lists among Emergency Medicine programs during the 2022-2023 academic year

Analysis of Anonymous Student Narratives About Experiences with Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.

Academic emergency medicine (EM) communities have viewed anonymous online communities (AOC) such as Reddit or specialty-specific "applicant spreadsheets" as poor advising resources. Despite this, robust EM AOCs exist, with large user bases and heavy readership. Insights about applicants' authentic experiences can be critical for applicants and program leadership decision-making. To date, there are no EM studies to qualitatively assess EM AOC narratives during the application cycle. Our goal was to perform a qualitative analysis of students' EM program experiences through a publicly available AOC. This was a qualitative analysis of a publicly available, time-stamped, user-locked AOC dataset: "Official 2020-2021 Emergency Medicine Applicant Spreadsheet." We extracted and then de-identified all data from selected sub-sheets entitled "Virtual Interview Impressions" and "Rotation Impressions." Four investigators used constant comparative method to analyze the data inductively, and they subsequently met to generate common themes discussed by students. Preliminary thematic analysis was conducted on a random sample of 37/183 (20%) independent narratives to create the initial codebook. This was used and updated iteratively to analyze the entire narrative set consisting of 841 discrete statements. Finally, two unique codes were created to distinguish whether the identified sub-themes, or program attributes, were likely "modifiable" or "non-modifiable." We identified six major themes: living and working conditions; interpersonal relationships; learning experiences, postgraduate readiness, and online/virtual supplements. Common sub-themes included patient population (13%); resident personality (7%); program leadership personality (7%); relationship with faculty/leadership (6%); geography (4%); practice setting (4%); program reputation (4%), and postgraduate year-3 experiences (4%). Modifiable sub-themes outnumbered non-modifiable sub-themes, 60.7% to 39.3%. In this analysis of selected medical students' narratives in an AOC, the majority of identified themes represented topics that may serve as external feedback for EM residency programs and their clerkships. Selective use of AOCs may set a precedent for future program assessments by applicants and inform program leadership of important programmatic elements in the eyes of applicants. It elucidates important themes in their interactions or learning experiences with programs and creates opportunities for learner-centric program improvement.

Staffing Patterns of Non-ACGME Fellowships with 4-Year Residency Programs: A National Survey.

Emergency medicine (EM) is one of few specialties with variable training lengths. Hiring a three-year graduate to continue fellowship training in a department that supports a four-year residency program can lead to conflicts around resident supervision. We sought to understand hiring and clinical supervision, or staffing, patterns of non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowships hosted at institutions supporting four-year residency programs. We performed a web-based, cross-sectional survey of non-ACGME fellowship directors (FD) hosted at institutions supporting four-year EM residency programs. We calculated descriptive statistics. Our primary outcome was the proportion of programs with four-year EM residencies that hire non-ACGME fellows graduating from three-year EM residencies. Of 119 eligible FDs, 88 (74%) completed the survey. Seventy FDs (80%) indicated that they hire graduates of three-year residencies. Fifty-six (80%) indicated that three-year graduates supervise residents. Most FDs (74%) indicated no additional requirements exist to supervise residents outside of being hired as faculty. The FDs cited department policy, concerns about quality and length of training, and resident complaints as reasons for not hiring three-year graduates. A majority (10/18, 56%) noted that not hiring fellows from three-year programs negatively impacts recruitment and gives them access to a smaller applicant pool. Most non-ACGME fellowships at institutions with four-year EM programs recruit three-year graduates and allow them to supervise residents. This survey provides programs information on how comparable fellowships recruit and staff their departments, which may inform policies that fit the needs of their learners, the fellowship, and the department.