Emergency Medical Services Group Research Articles

Effect of early initiation of noninvasive ventilation in patients transported by emergency medical service for acute heart failure

Background While the indication for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in severely hypoxemic patients with acute heart failure (AHF) is often indicated and may improve clinical course, the benefit of early initiation before patient arrival to the emergency department (ED) remains unknown. Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of early initiation of NIV during emergency medical service (EMS) transportation on outcomes in patients with AHF. Design A secondary retrospective analysis of the EAHFE (Epidemiology of AHF in EDs) registry. Setting Fifty-three Spanish EDs. Participants Patients with AHF transported by EMS physician-staffed ambulances who were treated with NIV at any time during of their emergency care were included and categorized into two groups based on the place of NIV initiation: prehospital (EMS group) or ED (ED group). Outcome measures Primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital mortality and 30-day postdischarge death, readmission to hospital or return visit to the ED due to AHF. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality after the index event (ED admission) and the different component of the composite primary endpoint considered individually. Multivariate logistic regressions were employed for analysis. Results Out of 2406 patients transported by EMS, 487 received NIV (EMS group: 31%; EMS group: 69%). Mean age was 79 years, 48% were women. The EMS group, characterized by younger age, more coronary artery disease, and less atrial fibrillation, received more prehospital treatments. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for composite endpoint was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.42–1.05). The aOR for secondary endpoints were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38–1.45) for in-hospital mortality, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.40–1.37) for 30-day mortality, 0.70 (95% CI: 0.41–1.21) for 30-day postdischarge ED reconsultation, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.44–1.44) for 30-day postdischarge rehospitalization, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.25–2.04) for 30-day postdischarge death. Conclusion In this ancillary analysis, prehospital initiation of NIV in patients with AHF was not associated with a significant reduction in short-term outcomes. The large confidence intervals, however, may preclude significant conclusion, and all point estimates consistently pointed toward a potential benefit from early NIV initiation.

Adverse Effects After Prehospital Administration of Naloxone by Bystanders: A Preliminary Study.

Opioid use disorder is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. In order to reverse opioid overdose as quickly as possible, many institutions and municipalities have encouraged people with no professional medical training to carry and administer naloxone. This study sought to provide preliminary data for research into the rates of adverse effects of naloxone when administered by bystanders compared to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel, since this question has not been studied previously. This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an urban, tertiary, academic medical center that operates its own EMS service. A consecutive sample of patients presenting to EMS with opioid overdose requiring naloxone was separated into two groups based on whether naloxone was administered by bystanders or by EMS personnel. Each group was analyzed to determine the incidence of four pre-specified adverse events. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the bystander (19%) and EMS (16%) groups (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.63 - 2.32; P = .499) in this small sample. Based on these initial results, a study would need a sample size of 6,188 in order to reach this conclusion with 80% power. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of any of the individual adverse events. Secondary analysis of patients' demographics showed differences between the two groups which generate hypotheses for further investigation of disparities in naloxone administration. This preliminary study provides foundational data for further investigation of naloxone administration by bystanders. Adverse events after the prehospital administration of naloxone are rare, and future studies will require large sample sizes. These preliminary data did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in adverse event rates when comparing naloxone administration by bystanders and EMS clinicians. This study provides data that will be useful for conducting further research on multiple facets of this topic.

Impact of Mobile Stroke Units on Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prespecified BEST‐MSU Substudy

Background The impact of mobile stroke units (MSUs) on outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusions eligible for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has yet to be characterized. Methods We completed a prespecified substudy of patients with EVT‐eligible stroke with anterior and posterior circulation large vessel occlusions on computed tomography and/or computed tomography angiography who were enrolled in BEST‐MSU (Benefits of Stroke Treatment using a Mobile Stroke Unit). Primary outcome was 90‐day utility‐weighted modified Rankin scale. Groups were compared using chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables, and 2‐sample t ‐tests for continuous variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of MSU on binary outcomes after adjusting for other baseline factors. Results Of 1515 trial patients, 293 had large vessel occlusions eligible for EVT: 168 in the MSU group and 125 in the emergency medical services group. Baseline characteristics were comparable, with the exception of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (MSU median 19 [interquartile range 13, 23] versus emergency medical services 16 [11, 20], P = 0.002) and study site. The mean (±SD) score on the utility‐weighted modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 0.63±0.39 in MSU group and 0.51±0.41 in emergency medical services group (mean difference 0.13, 95% CI [0.03–0.22]). After adjustment, MSU had significantly higher odds of functional independence (odds ratio 2.60 [95% CI, 1.45–4.77], P = 0.002). Secondary outcomes also favored MSU: early neurologic recovery (30% improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours) 68% versus 52%; adjusted odds ratio 1.98 [95% CI, 1.19–3.33]; time of tissue plasminogen activator bolus from symptom onset 65.0 minutes [50.5–92.0] versus 96.0 [79.3–130.0], P ≤0.001. The groups had similar onset to arterial puncture (169.0 minutes [133.5, 210.0] versus 162.0 [135.0–207.0], P = 0.83). Conclusions In patients with EVT‐eligible large vessel occlusion stroke, MSU management was associated with better clinical outcomes compared with standard emergency medical services management. MSU management sped thrombolysis but did not expedite EVT treatment times. Future MSU processes should include efforts to capitalize on the potential of MSUs to provide earlier EVT.

Disposition of emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism after ambulance arrival.

Most outpatients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). The relationship between means of arrival, site of diagnosis, and disposition in ED patients with PE is unknown. We compared discharge home between patients arriving by emergency medical services (EMS) and those arriving by other means. Within the EMS cohort, we compared those with a recent PE diagnosis in the outpatient clinic setting to those who were diagnosed with PE in the ED. This study was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort that included all adult, non-pregnant ED patients treated for acute PE across 21 community EDs from January 2013 to April 2015. The primary outcome was discharge home within 24h of ED registration; we also examined mortality. We described associations with patient arrival method and other patient characteristics. Among 2996 ED patient encounters with acute PE, 644 (21.5%) arrived by EMS. This group had a lower frequency of discharge (9.2% vs 26.4%) and higher 30-day all-cause mortality (8.7% vs 3.1%) than their counterparts (p<0.001 for both). These associations remained after adjusting for confounding variables. Among the EMS cohort, 14 patients (2.2%) arrived with a PE diagnosis recently made in the outpatient setting. Patients with PE who arrived at the ED by EMS were less likely to be discharged home within 24h and more likely to die within 30 days than those who arrived by other means. Less than 3% of the EMS group had been diagnosed with PE before ED arrival.

Comparing 5G mobile stroke unit and emergency medical service in patients acute ischemic stroke eligible for t-PA treatment: A prospective, single-center clinical trial in Ya'an, China.

This study aims to assess and compare the functional outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) eligible for tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) treatment who received care from either a fifth-generation(5G) mobile stroke unit (MSU) or traditional emergency medical service (EMS). The study recruited patients between February 2020 and January 2022, with the final 90-day follow-up concluded in April 2022. Prior to enrollment, patients were assigned to either EMS or MSU care based on predetermined rules. The primary outcome measure was the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, with secondary outcome measures including time metrics, mRS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at 7-day follow-up, and hospitalization costs. Of the 2281 enrolled patients, 207 were eligible for t-PA treatment, with 101 allocated to MSU care and 106 to EMS care. The percentage of patients achieving a favorable mRS score (0-2) at 90 days was 82.2% in the MSU group compared to 72.6% in the EMS group (p < .05). Median times from symptom onset to thrombolysis were 146 min in the MSU group and 204 min in the EMS group, while median times from ambulance alert to computed tomography (CT)completion were 53 and 128 min, respectively. Hospitalization charges averaged approximately $3592 in the MSU group and $4800 in the EMS group. Our findings indicate that 5G MSU care significantly reduces the time from symptom onset to stroke diagnosis and intravenous thrombolysis in patients with AIS, resulting in improved functional outcomes compared to EMS care. As China continues its deployment of 5G technology and other digital infrastructures, the adoption of 5G MSU care on a broader scale may eventually supplant traditional stroke treatment approaches.

Outcomes of patients with pre-existing disability managed by mobile stroke units: A sub-analysis of the BEST-MSU study.

Few data exist on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. A recent trial of mobile stroke units (MSUs) demonstrated faster treatment and improved outcomes, and included PD patients. To determine outcomes with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and benefit of MSU versus management by emergency medical services (EMS), for PD patients. Primary outcomes were utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with versus without PD, and PD patients treated by MSU versus standard management by EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were compared. Of the 1047 tPA-eligible ischemic stroke patients, 254 were with PD (baseline mRS 2-5) and 793 were without PD (baseline mRS 0-1). Although PD patients had worse 90-day uw-mRS, higher mortality, more health-care utilization, and worse quality of life than non-disabled patients, 53% returned to at least their baseline mRS, those treated faster had better outcome, and there was no increased bleeding risk. Comparing PD patients treated by MSU versus EMS, 90-day uw-mRS was 0.42 versus 0.36 (p = 0.07) and 57% versus 46% returned to at least their baseline mRS. There was no interaction between disability status and MSU versus EMS group assignment (p = 0.67) for 90-day uw-mRS. PD did not prevent the benefit of faster treatment with tPA in the BEST-MSU study. Our data support inclusion of PD patients in the MSU management paradigm.

Does Emergency Medical Services Blood Collection Shorten Time to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke?

Background: Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. To reduce the likelihood of debilitating outcomes, early treatment with fibrinolytics is necessary; however, many struggle to identify strategies that limit time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify if implementing a process for obtaining laboratory blood draws by emergency medical services (EMS) prior to patient arrival at the hospital will reduce the door-to-needle time for patients arriving with acute ischemic stroke. Objectives: To compare the door-to-needle time for patients with acute ischemic stroke who had blood drawn via EMS versus in hospital. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at a 433-bed designated Level II Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center community hospital. A comprehensive chart review was done via stroke coordinator binders and electronic medical record. Adult patients ≥18 years of age with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis who met criteria for and received alteplase were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they did not arrive via EMS. The primary end point assessed time to fibrinolytic treatment via door-to-needle times. Results: A total of 66 patients were included with 28 in the EMS laboratory drawn group and 38 in the usual group. Median door-to-needle time was 57.5 ± 19.0 minutes in the EMS group and 55.0 ± 31.9 minutes in the usual care group (p = 0.818). Conclusions: Collection of blood for laboratories by EMS personnel did not significantly shorten door-to-needle time.

Emergency medical services utilisation among febrile children attending emergency departments across Europe: an observational multicentre study

Children constitute 6–10% of all patients attending the emergency department (ED) by emergency medical services (EMS). However, discordant EMS use in children occurs in 37–61% with fever as an important risk factor. We aimed to describe EMS utilisation among febrile children attending European EDs. This study is part of an observational multicentre study assessing management and outcome in febrile children up to 18 years (MOFICHE) attending twelve EDs in eight European countries. Discordant EMS use was defined as the absence of markers of urgency including intermediate/high triage urgency, advanced diagnostics, treatment, and admission in children transferred by EMS. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between (1) EMS use and markers of urgency, and (2) patient characteristics and discordant EMS use after adjusting all analyses for the covariates age, gender, visiting hours, presenting symptoms, and ED setting. A total of 5464 (15%, range 0.1–42%) children attended the ED by EMS. Markers of urgency were more frequently present in the EMS group compared with the non-EMS group. Discordant EMS use occurred in 1601 children (29%, range 1–59%). Age and gender were not associated with discordant EMS use, whereas neurological symptoms were associated with less discordant EMS use (aOR 0.2, 95%CI 0.1–0.2), and attendance out of office hours was associated with more discordant EMS use (aOR 1.6, 95%CI 1.4–1.9). Settings with higher percentage of self-referrals to the ED had more discordant EMS use (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There is large practice variation in EMS use in febrile children attending European EDs. Markers of urgency were more frequently present in children in the EMS group. However, discordant EMS use occurred in 29%. Further research is needed on non-medical factors influencing discordant EMS use in febrile children across Europe, so that pre-emptive strategies can be implemented.What is Known:•Children constitute around 6–10% of all patients attending the emergency department by emergency medical services.•Discordant EMS use occurs in 37–61% of all children, with fever as most common presenting symptom for discordant EMS use in children.What is New:•There is large practice variation in EMS use among febrile children across Europe with discordance EMS use occurring in 29% (range 1–59%), which was associated with attendance during out of office hours and with settings with higher percentage of self-referrals to the ED.•Future research is needed focusing on non-medical factors (socioeconomic status, parental preferences and past experience, healthcare systems, referral pathways, out of hours services provision) that influence discordant EMS use in febrile children across Europe.

Análisis de una red de atención al IAMCEST: impacto pronóstico del tipo de primer contacto médico

Introduction and objectivesPrognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is determined by delay in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The impact of first medical contact (FMC) facility type on reperfusion delays and mortality remains controversial. MethodsWe performed a prospective registry of primary coronary intervention (PCI)-treated STEMI patients (2010-2020) in the Codi Infart STEMI network. We analyzed 1-year all-cause mortality depending on the FMC facility type: emergency medical service (EMS), community hospital (CH), PCI hospital (PCI-H), or primary care center (PCC). ResultsWe included 18 332 patients (EMS 34.3%; CH 33.5%; PCI-H 12.3%; PCC 20.0%). Patients with Killip-Kimball classes III-IV were: EMS 8.43%, CH 5.54%, PCI-H 7.51%, PCC 3.76% (P <.001). All comorbidities and first medical assistance complications were more frequent in the EMS and PCI-H groups (P <.05) and were less frequent in the PCC group (P <.05 for most variables). The PCI-H group had the shortest FMC-to-PCI delay (median 82 minutes); the EMS group achieved the shortest total ischemic time (median 151 minutes); CH had the longest reperfusion delays (P <.001). In an adjusted logistic regression model, the PCI-H and CH groups were associated with higher 1-year mortality, OR, 1.22 (95%CI, 1.00-1.48; P=.048), and OR, 1.17 (95%CI 1.02-1.36; P=.030), respectively, while the PCC group was associated with lower 1-year mortality than the EMS group, OR, 0.71 (95%CI 0.58-0.86; P <.001). ConclusionsFMC with PCI-H and CH was associated with higher adjusted 1-year mortality than FMC with EMS. The PCC group had a much lower intrinsic risk and was associated with better outcomes despite longer revascularization delays.

Abstract WMP2: Acute Stroke Treatment In Patients With Pre-exiting Disability: A Secondary Analysis Of The BEST-MSU Trial

Background: Few data exists on acute stroke treatment in patients with pre-existing disability (PD) since they are usually excluded from clinical trials. Methods: A pre-specified subgroup analysis of tPA-eligible patients with PD enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial of Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) vs standard management by emergency medical services (EMS). All patients had baseline mRS scores. Co-primary outcomes were mean utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale score (uw-mRS) and return to baseline mRS at 90 days. Linear and logistic regression models compared outcomes in patients with vs without PD, and patients with PD treated by MSU vs EMS. Time metrics, safety, quality of life, and health-care utilization were also compared. Results: Of 1047 patients, 254 had baseline mRS &gt;= 2 (159 MSU, 95 EMS; 31% mRS 2, 52% mRS 3, 17% mRS 4). Compared to patients without disability, patients with PD were older, had higher NIHSS, more comorbidities, less often lived at home, were treated slower, and had less thrombectomy. Patients with PD had worse 90-day uw-mRS (0.39 vs 0.80), higher mortality, more health-care utilization and worse quality of life than patients without PD. However, rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and final diagnoses of stroke mimics were similar between groups, and 52% of patients with PD returned to their baseline mRS. Patients with PD treated within the first hour had better 90-day uw-mRS than those treated later (0.48 vs 0.36, p=0.01). Comparing patients with PD treated by MSU vs EMS, time from last-known-well to tPA bolus was shorter (82 vs 111 min), and 24% vs 0% were treated in the first hour. Among patients with PD, MSU patients had non-significantly better 90-day uw-mRS (0.41 vs 0.35, p=0.09) and higher rate of returning to baseline mRS (56% vs 44%, p=0.09) than EMS patients. There was no interaction between either time to treatment (p=0.24) or MSU vs EMS group assignment (p= 0.42), 90-day uw-mRS, and PD vs no disability status. Conclusion: Although outcomes after stroke are less favorable in patients with vs without PD, in a large, controlled trial, we found no interaction between baseline disability and the benefit of MSU treatment. Our data support the earliest treatment of acute stroke patients regardless of premorbid functional status.

Performance analysis of a STEMI network: prognostic impact of the type of first medical contact facility

Introduction and objectivesPrognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is determined by delay in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The impact of first medical contact (FMC) facility type on reperfusion delays and mortality remains controversial. MethodsWe performed a prospective registry of primary coronary intervention (PCI)-treated STEMI patients (2010-2020) in the Codi Infart STEMI network. We analyzed 1-year all-cause mortality depending on the FMC facility type: emergency medical service (EMS), community hospital (CH), PCI hospital (PCI-H), or primary care center (PCC). ResultsWe included 18 332 patients (EMS 34.3%; CH 33.5%; PCI-H 12.3%; PCC 20.0%). Patients with Killip-Kimball classes III-IV were: EMS 8.43%, CH 5.54%, PCI-H 7.51%, PCC 3.76% (P <.001). All comorbidities and first medical assistance complications were more frequent in the EMS and PCI-H groups (P <.05) and were less frequent in the PCC group (P <.05 for most variables). The PCI-H group had the shortest FMC-to-PCI delay (median 82 minutes); the EMS group achieved the shortest total ischemic time (median 151 minutes); CH had the longest reperfusion delays (P <.001). In an adjusted logistic regression model, the PCI-H and CH groups were associated with higher 1-year mortality, OR, 1.22 (95%CI, 1.00-1.48; P=.048), and OR, 1.17 (95%CI 1.02-1.36; P=.030), respectively, while the PCC group was associated with lower 1-year mortality than the EMS group, OR, 0.71 (95%CI 0.58-0.86; P <.001). ConclusionsFMC with PCI-H and CH was associated with higher adjusted 1-year mortality than FMC with EMS. The PCC group had a much lower intrinsic risk and was associated with better outcomes despite longer revascularization delays.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patient Transport to the Hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS); a Cross-sectional Study.

To enhance the efficiency, it is essential to understand the patterns of service users and develop policies that facilitate effective personnel and resource management. This study aimedto compare the characteristic and outcomes of patients who were transferred to emergency department (ED) by emergency medical services (EMS) and patients transported by other means. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand, over a 5-year period from 2017-2021. The baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients who were transported to ED using EMS and Non-EMS were gathered and compared using STATA software. The study included 15,501 patients with the median age of 51 (interquartile range (IQR): 23-71) years who were referred by EMS over the five-year period (51.72% male). EMS patients had significantly higher median age (51 (23 - 71) vs. 37 (21 - 60); p < 0.001) with male preference (p < 0.001). In the EMS group, the triage level 1 (need for resuscitation) was higher than the non-EMS group (p < 0.001), most of the patients referred following trauma (p < 0.001), and the frequency of cardiac arrest was considerably higher than non-EMS group (2.54% vs 0.05%; p < 0.001). Patients in the EMS group received a higher number of blood tests (p < 0.001), plain radiographic exams (p < 0.001), computerized tomography (CT) scans (p < 0.001), and complex procedures (p < 0.001) than the non-EMS group. The EMS group had a greater number of hospital admissions (p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (p < 0.001) compared to the non-EMS group. The EMS group exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate compared to the non-EMS group (p < 0.001). The population utilizing EMS services had higher median age, higher frequency of emergency cases and trauma related complaint, higher need for treatment interventions and imaging procedures, higher rate of hospital and ICU admissions, as well as higher rate of mortality compared to the non-EMS group.

251 Emergency Department Arrival by Ambulance for Patients Receiving a Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Is Associated With Hospitalization: Is Coming from Off-site Radiology an Exception?

251 Emergency Department Arrival by Ambulance for Patients Receiving a Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Is Associated With Hospitalization: Is Coming from Off-site Radiology an Exception?

Association of intensive care unit or paediatric intensive care unit admissions with the method of transporting patients: a multicentre retrospective study

BackgroundReports regarding transportation methods of severely critical patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) or paediatric ICU (PICU) are limited. In an attempt to address this research gap, this study aimed to test the hypothesis that prognosis is worse in patients transported by family members.MethodsThis multicentre study collected data from the Japanese Registry of Paediatric Acute Care database. Data concerning patients aged ≤16 years admitted to a participating hospital ICU or PICU and their transportation method to the hospital were extracted and divided into two groups: transported by family and transported by emergency medical services (EMS).ResultsOf the 2963 patients who met the criteria, 871 (29.4%) were transported by family and 2092 (70.6%) were transported by EMS. Significantly more patients with chronic conditions (551 patients, 63.3% vs. 845 patients, 40.4%; p < 0.01) or respiratory failure (414 patients, 47.5% vs. 455 patients, 21.7%; p < 0.01) were admitted to the ICU or PICU in the family transport group. There was no significant difference in survival rate between EMS and family transport group, matched by PIM2, chronic condition status and transport distance (OR:1.17, 95%CI:0.39–3.47, p = 0.78).ConclusionThe results of this study show that the transportation method does not affect the survival rate of paediatric patients. The proportion of patients with chronic conditions or those admitted because of respiratory failure was higher in the family transport group than in the EMS group. Therefore, as these patients are more likely to be admitted to the ICU or PICU, it is important to provide prompt respiratory care and medical interventions to achieve the best outcomes.

Does the presence of physician-staffed emergency medical services improve the prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A propensity score matching analysis.

Substantial differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been observed between countries. These might be attributed to the organization of emergency medical service (EMS) systems, including prehospital physician involvement. However, limited data exist on the physician's role in improving survival after OHCA. To compare prehospital and in-hospital outcomes of OHCA patients attended by physician-staffed EMS vs. paramedic-staffed EMS units. Among all patients enrolled in the regional, prospective registry of OHCA in southern Poland, we excluded those aged <18 years, with unwitnessed or EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest, without attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), attended by more than one EMS, or with traumatic cardiac arrest. The groups were matched 1:1 using propensity scores for baseline characteristic variables that might influence physician-staffed EMS dispatch. A total of 812 OHCA cases were included in the current analysis. Among them, 351 patients were attended by physician-staffed EMS. There were no differences in baseline characteristics in the propensity-score matched cohort consisting of 351 pairs. The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was more often achieved in the physician-staffed EMS group (42.7% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.01). The prehospital survival rate was also higher in this group (34.1% vs. 19.2%; P <0.01). However, there were no significant differences in survival rate to discharge between cases treated by physician-staffed and paramedic-staffed EMS (9.7% vs. 7.0%; P = 0.22). OHCA patients attended by physician-staffed EMS were more likely to have ROSC and survive till hospital admission. However, better prehospital outcomes might not translate into improved in-hospital prognosis in these patients.

Association between Mode of Transport and Patient Outcomes in the Emergency Department following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a health problem worldwide, carrying a high mortality rate. Comparison of emergency department (ED) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after OHCA in relation to emergency medical services (EMS) and non-EMS modes of transportation to the hospital was conducted to assess the impact points of the EMS system in Thailand. Methods This retrospective observational study enrolled all OHCA patients who visited the ED of Ramathibodi Hospital, a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok, between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2020. Patients were differentiated into EMS and non-EMS groups according to mode of transportation to the ED. Patients’ characteristics and comorbidities, witnessed arrests, bystander chest compression, initial rhythm, and resuscitation treatment were documented. ED-sustained ROSC, ED survival, 30-day survival, and 30-day survival with good cerebral performance category (CPC) scores were monitored and recorded. Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to assess factors influencing clinical outcomes. Results A total of 339 patients were enrolled, 117 (34.51%) of whom were in the EMS transport group. There were no differences between the EMS and non-EMS groups in ED-sustained ROSC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–1.70; P = 0.98), or ED survival (aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57–1.71; P = 0.97). There were also no differences in 30-day survival or 30-day survival with good CPC score between the two groups. Conclusions In our cohort data of OHCA, ED-sustained ROSC and ED survival outcomes were not superior in the EMS transportation group. Evidence to show that EMS transportation affected 30-day survival and 30-day good CPC score was also lacking. Thus, public promotion of Thailand’s EMS system is advocated with a simultaneous improvement of EMS response to enhance OHCA outcomes.

Abstract TP71: Characteristics And Demographics Of Patients Using Emergency Medical Services For Suspected Acute Stroke And Its Impact On Long-term Outcomes In A Multi Ethnic Population

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients who receive IV thrombolysis are more likely to have good long-term prognosis. Unfortunately, more than two-third of IS patients present outside the therapeutic window. The use of emergency medical services (EMS) can reduce pre-hospital delay and increase likelihood of treatment with t-PA. We aim to determine the characteristic variations amongst the suspected acute stroke patients using EMS. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, all suspected acute stroke patients admitted to Hamad General Hospital from April 30, 2014 to September 15, 2020 were included. We evaluated demographics, clinical features, impact on treatment and associated factors in EMS versus non-EMS group. Results: During the study period, 11892 patients presented as suspected acute stroke. Of these, 65.1% used EMS (EMS-group). Mean age in EMS group was 53.4 + 14.1 versus 52.6 + 14.0 in non-EMS group (p = 0.003). Male to female ratio in both groups was 3:1. The proportion of patients who used EMS were higher in the Asian (66.8%), African (66.8%) and Caucasian (66.6%) population as compared to Arabs (61.9%). EMS use in Qatari population (59.2%) was relatively low. Intracerebral hemorrhage patients (82.4%) had a significantly higher EMS use followed by IS (65.7%) and cerebral venous thrombosis (64.7%); p&lt;0.001. Symptom onset time of less than 4.5 hours at presentation was reported by 41% in EMS-group versus 24.3% in Non-EMS group. Patients with prior stroke (65.5%) and transient ischemic attack (58.4%) preferred EMS as compared to Non-EMS group (34.5% and 41.5%). Patients with unilateral weakness (66.4%) aphasia (78.2%), neglect (78.2%), dysarthria (68.4%), loss of consciousness (83.3%) and seizures (83.9%) had a higher use of EMS versus non-EMS group. The thrombolysis rate in EMS group was high vs non-EMS (82.4% vs 17.6%; p&lt;0.001) with a door-to-needle time significantly lower in the EMS group (56.4 + 38.2 vs 75.7 + 43.8; p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: EMS use facilitate rapid transfer, timely stroke evaluation and management of patients who need time-critical care. Patient characteristics and demographics, clinical symptoms and stroke type are associated with early stroke recognition and EMS use leading to higher recanalization rate.

Abstract 24: Mobile Stroke Units Associated With Favorable Clinical Outcome In Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients: BEST-MSU Substudy

Introduction: Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) improve clinical outcome in patients treated with tPA compared to standard management by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), but the impact of MSUs on outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) having endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has yet to be determined. Methods: A pre-specified substudy of tPA-eligible stroke patients with LVOs on CT and/or CTA who were enrolled in the Benefits of Stroke Treatment Using a Mobile Stroke Unit (BEST-MSU), a prospective multicenter controlled trial comparing MSU with standard EMS management, was conducted. The primary outcome was the score on the 90-day utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS). Secondary outcomes were rate of early neurologic recovery (30% improvement in NIHSS score) at 24 hours and functional independence (mRS 0-1) at 90 days. Results: A total of 295 patients were included, 169 in the MSU group and 126 in the EMS group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups, with the exception of baseline NIHSS (MSU median 19.0 [IQR 13.0, 23.0] vs EMS 16.0 [11.0, 20.0], p=0.003). 92% MSU vs 87% EMS LVO patients received tPA, and 78% vs 85% went on to have EVT. MSU LVO patients had faster tPA bolus from symptom onset (65.0 min [50.5, 92.0] vs 96.0 [79.3, 130.0], p&lt;0.001), however the two groups had similar onset to groin puncture (169.0 min [133.8, 212.3] vs 162.0 [135.3, 207.0], p=0.77). The mean (±SD) score on the uw-mRS at 90 days was 0.64±0.39 in the MSU group and 0.50±0.40 in the EMS group (mean difference 0.16, 95% CI [0.07, 0.25] after adjustment for age, baseline NIHSS, premorbid functional status, prior stroke/TIA and site; p&lt;0.001). Early neurologic recovery (68% vs 52%; adjusted OR 1.89 95% CI [1.14,3.17]) and functional independence (Figure 1, 42% vs 29%; 2.48 [1.38,4.55]) also favored the MSU group. Conclusions: In tPA-eligible LVO stroke patients, MSU management was associated with better clinical outcomes compared with standard EMS management.

The association between mode of transport and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in Singapore

ObjectiveWe aimed to examine the survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, stratified by the transportation modes to the Emergency Department (ED). MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of Singapore’s Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study registry from Apr 2010-Dec 2017. The primary outcome was survival to discharge or 30 days post-arrest. Secondary outcomes were the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and neurological outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed for OHCA cases who collapsed enroute. ResultsA total of 15,376 cases were analysed. 15,129 (98.4%) were conveyed by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), 111 (0.72%) by private ambulance, 106 (0.69%) by own transport and 30 (0.2%) by public transport. 80% of patients brought by public transport arrested enroute, compared to 48.1% by own transport, 25.2% by private ambulance and 2.5% in the EMS group. 33/120 (27.5%) of paediatric OHCA cases were brought in by non-EMS transport to paediatric hospitals. The EMS group had the lowest survival rate at 4.5%, compared to 13.3% for public transport, 11.3% for own transport and 14.4% for private ambulance. ROSC rate was statistically significant but not for neurological outcomes. For the subgroup analysis, there was no statistical difference for primary and secondary outcomes across the groups. ConclusionIn Singapore, most OHCA patients are conveyed by EMS to the hospital, but some OHCA patients still arrive via alternative transport without prehospital interventions like bystander CPR. More can be done to educate the public to recognise an impending cardiac arrest and to activate EMS early for such cases.

Comparison of Prognosis According to the Use of Emergency Medical Services in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

PurposeThis study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes according to the use of emergency medical services (EMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who arrived at the hospital within 12 hr of symptom onset.Materials and MethodsA total of 13104 patients with acute myocardial infarction were enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry–National Institutes of Health from October 2011 to December 2015. Of them, 2416 patients with STEMI who arrived at the hospital within 12 hr were divided into two groups: 987 patients in the EMS group and 1429 in the non-EMS group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce bias from confounding variables. After PSM, 796 patients in the EMS group and 796 patients in the non-EMS group were analyzed. The clinical outcomes during 3 years of clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups according to the use of EMS.ResultsThe symptom-to-door time was significantly shorter in the EMS group than in the non-EMS group. The EMS group had more patients with high Killip class compared to the non-EMS group. The rates of all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were not significantly different between the two groups. After PSM, the rate of all-cause death and MACE were still not significantly different between the EMS and non-EMS groups. The predictors of mortality were high Killip class, renal dysfunction, old age, long door-to-balloon time, long symptom-to-door time, and heart failure.ConclusionEMS utilization was more frequent in high-risk patients. The use of EMS shortened the symptom-to-door time, but did not improve the prognosis in this cohort.