Emergency Medical Services Physicians Research Articles

Consensus Statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians International Association of Fire Chiefs and the International Association of Chiefs of Police: Best Practices for Collaboration Between Law Enforcement and Emergency Medical Services During Acute Behavioral Emergencies

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and law enforcement (LE) frequently work as a team in encounters with individuals experiencing acute behavioral emergencies manifesting with severe agitation and aggression. The optimal management is a rehearsed, coordinated effort by law enforcement and EMS providing the necessary interventions to address behaviors that endanger the patient, the responders, and the public. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance and direction in the shared responsibility of managing and caring for a person displaying behavioral instability with irrational, agitated, and/or violent behavior. This is a discussion of the roles of law enforcement, 911 call centers (hereafter referred to as the Emergency Call Centers or “ECCs”), Fire, and EMS. A coordinated and unified response enhances the safety and effective management of potentially serious situations posed by individuals experiencing such acute behavioral emergencies. This paper provides the framework for an approach endorsed by NAEMSP, IACP, and the IAFC.

Drones reduce the time to defibrillation in a highly visited non-urban area: A randomized simulation-based trial

IntroductionOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a high global incidence and mortality rate, with early defibrillation significantly improving survival. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of autonomous drone delivery of automated external defibrillators (AED) in a non-urban area with physical barriers and compare the time to defibrillate (TTD) with bystander retrieval from a public access defibrillator (PAD) point and helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) physician performed defibrillation. MethodsThis randomized simulation-based trial with a cross-over design included bystanders performing AED retrievals either delivered by automated drone flight or on foot from a PAD point, and simulated HEMS interventions. The primary outcome was the time to defibrillation, with secondary outcomes comparing workload, perceived physical effort, and ease of use. ResultsThirty-six simulations were performed. Drone-delivered AED intervention had a significantly shorter TTD [2.2 (95 % CI 2.0–2.3) min] compared to PAD retrieval [12.4 (95 % CI 10.4–14.4) min] and HEMS [18.2 (95 % CI 17.1–19.2) min].The self-reported physical effort on a visual analogue scale for drone-delivered AED was significantly lower versus PAD [2.5 (1 – 22) mm vs. 81 (65–99) mm, p = 0.02]. The overall mean workload measured by NASA-TLX was also significantly lower for drone delivery compared to PAD [4.3 (1.2–11.7) vs. 11.9 (5.5–14.5), p = 0.018]. ConclusionThe use of drones for automated AED delivery in a non-urban area with physical barriers is feasible and leads to a shorter time to defibrillation. Drone-delivered AEDs also involve a lower workload and perceived physical effort than AED retrieval on foot.

Comparison of the preclinical quality of analgesia of emergency physicians and paramedics based on trauma patients

Adequate prehospital pain management is acritical component of emergency medical services. With the introduction of the paramedic profession and the Paramedics Act in Germany, the basis for more extensive competencies of paramedics was established. In many emergency medical service areas it is thus possible for paramedics to perform analgesia and sedation with esketamine/midazolam according to pre-established instructions and/or standard operating procedures. This study assessed the quality of analgesia administered to trauma patients by paramedics compared to emergency medical service physicians. The study included trauma patients who received prehospital administration of analgesia by either emergency medical service physicians or paramedics and were subsequently admitted to the central emergency department of the Saarland University Hospital. Astandardized data collection form was used to collect information from the emergency service protocol and initial emergency department assessment. The evaluation employed descriptive statistical methods and a total of 207 completed records were analyzed. Both professional groups achieved significant pain reduction and fulfilled the criteria for effective pain management (pain reduction: emergency medical service physicians 5.5 ± 2.0/paramedic 4.4 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). Emergency medical service physicians, however, more frequently attained ahigher reduction in numerical rating scale scores and administered oxygen. Notable differences were observed in the range of medications used and the dosages. This study could show that prehospital analgesia is comparable between emergency medical service physicians and paramedics in terms of effectiveness for trauma patients if the indications are correctly set, while observing pre-existing instructions. With their competencies paramedics are able to perform an effective and safe analgesic treatment within the framework of preformulated procedural instructions, which can be equal to that of an emergency medical service physician.

Providing Performance Feedback and Patient Outcome Follow-Up to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is Associated with Subsequent Improved Clinical Performance

Objective Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians desire performance feedback (PF) and patient outcome follow-up (POF). Within our agency, both a peer-review and feedback/outcome (PF/POF) process exist. Our objective was to determine whether receiving feedback and outcome data improved future clinical care amongst EMS, based upon peer-review scores. Methods This retrospective cohort study took place between 1/1/2020 and 6/7/2023 within an EMS agency site with 22,000 average annual 9-1-1 calls. Requests for PF/POF were submitted on an individual basis beginning June 2020 and completed by a dedicated EMS nurse, EMS physician, or emergency medicine (EM) resident. Peer-review of select high-acuity cases were scored by two Quality Assurance (QA) specialists within the categories of assessment, treatment, disposition/outcome and process/administrative guidelines. Association between overall peer-review score and number of PF/POF requests at time of assessment was evaluated by linear regression. Results A total of 378 PF/POF requests were received, with the most common patient complaints being cardiac (n = 105; 27.8%, including 49 (13.0%) out of hospital cardiac arrests), altered mental status/neurologic (n = 103; 27.2%), trauma (n = 61; 16.1%, including 2 (0.5%) traumatic arrests); and respiratory distress (n = 47; 12.4%). A total of 378 runs meeting QA criteria were peer-reviewed post-PF/POF process implementation, including 337 (89.2%) cardiac/respiratory arrests, 27 (7.1%) with difficult airway management, and 14 (3.7%) major trauma/traumatic arrests. The number of prior PF/POF requests made by the team leader was associated with higher overall peer-review scores. Team leaders with >5 prior PF/POF requests had a peer-review score 0.39 points greater (95% CI: 0.16 − 0.62, p = 0.001) than those with <5 prior requests. The number of prior PF/POF requests amongst the entire crew was also associated with higher peer-review scores. Crews that collectively had >5 prior PF/POF requests had an increase in peer-review score 0.32 points greater (95% CI: 0.14 − 0.50, p < 0.001) than those with <5 prior requests. Conclusion Providing performance feedback and patient outcome follow-up to EMS is associated with improved peer-review scores of clinical performance. Future studies should assess if those that are submitting cases for feedback/outcome are higher performers at baseline or if the process of receiving feedback/outcome improves their performance.

Diagnostic agreement between emergency medical service and emergency department physicians, a prospective multicentre study

IntroductionEarly and adequate preliminary diagnosis reduce emergency department (ED) and hospital stay and may reduce mortality. Several studies demonstrated adequate preliminary diagnosis as stated by emergency medical services (EMS) ranging between 61 and 77%. Dutch EMS are highly trained, but performance of stating adequate preliminary diagnosis remains unknown.MethodsThis prospective observational study included 781 patients (> 18years), who arrived in the emergency department (ED) by ambulance in two academic hospitals. For each patient, the diagnosis as stated by EMS and the ED physician was obtained and compared. Diagnosis was categorized based on the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision.ResultsThe overall diagnostic agreement was 79% [95%-CI: 76–82%]. Agreement was high for traumatic injuries (94%), neurological emergencies (90%), infectious diseases (84%), cardiovascular (78%), moderate for mental and drug related (71%), gastrointestinal (70%), and low for endocrine and metabolic (50%), and acute internal emergencies (41%). There is no correlation between 28-day mortality, the need for ICU admission or the need for hospital admission with an adequate preliminary diagnosis.ConclusionIn the Netherlands, the extent of agreement between EMS diagnosis and ED discharge diagnosis varies between categories. Accuracy is high in diseases with specific observations, e.g., neurological failure, detectable injuries, and electrocardiographic abnormalities. Further studies should use these findings to improve patient outcome.

The accuracy of predicting hospital admission by emergency medical service and emergency department personnel compared to the prehospital MEWS: a prospective multicenter study

IntroductionOvercrowding in the emergency department (ED) is a global problem. Early and accurate recognition of a patient’s disposition could limit time spend at the ED and thus improve throughput and quality of care provided. This study aims to compare the accuracy among healthcare providers and the prehospital Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in predicting the requirement for hospital admission.MethodsA prospective, observational, multi-centre study was performed including adult patients brought to the ED by ambulance. Involved Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel, ED nurses and physicians were asked to predict the need for hospital admission using a structured questionnaire. Primary endpoint was the comparison between the accuracy of healthcare providers and prehospital MEWS in predicting patients’ need for hospital admission.ResultsIn total 798 patients were included of whom 393 (49.2%) were admitted to the hospital. Sensitivity of predicting hospital admission varied from 80.0 to 91.9%, with physicians predicting hospital admission significantly more accurately than EMS and ED nurses (p < 0.001). Specificity ranged from 56.4 to 67.0%. All healthcare providers outperformed MEWS ≥ 3 score on predicting hospital admission (sensitivity 80.0-91.9% versus 44.0%; all p < 0.001). Predictions for ward admissions specifically were significantly more accurate than MEWS (specificity 94.7–95.9% versus 60.6%, all p < 0.001).ConclusionsHealthcare providers can accurately predict the need for hospital admission, and all providers outperformed the MEWS score.

Population-Based Analysis of 6534 Seizure Emergency Cases from Emergency Medical Services Data.

Seizures are common reasons to call an ambulance, and this study aims to analyze the burden of seizures in the prehospital setting based on incidence, hospital admission rate, and costs. This was a population-based, cross-sectional analysis of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) data on suspected seizure cases from the federal state of Hesse, Germany, in 2019. A total of 6534 suspected seizure cases were identified, of which most were those with a known seizure disorder. Incidence rate for epilepsy-related seizures (ES; pediatric epilepsy, first seizure [1stS], seizure with known seizure disorder [SEPI]) was 205.7 per 100,000 inhabitants and incidence rate for pediatric febrile seizures (PFS) was 36.7 per 100,000 inhabitants, corresponding to 171,275 ES and 28,500 PFS (99.3% < 18years) cases in Germany. A prehospital EMS physician was involved in 40.0% (SEPI) to 54.4% (PFS) of suspected seizure cases. Depending on the type of seizure, 70.7% (SEPI) to 80.9% (1stS) were admitted to hospital for inpatient stay of ≥ 24h. An additional 4% (PFS) to 16% (1stS) of cases needed immediate intervention at hospital. Prehospital EMS staff needed 8:24min:s (SD 7:24; n = 5004) after the emergency call to arrive at the scene of the ES and 10:58min:s (SD 27:39; n = 321) for PFS. ES and PFS cases caused estimated costs of 48.5 and 8.1million euros for Germany in 2019, respectively, not including hospital treatment-related costs. This study identified a high number of suspected seizure-related emergency casesand proportion of patients admitted to hospitals, as well as high associated costs in Germany.

Development and Deployment of a Pre-Planned Hospital Emergency Response Team (HERT) for EMS Augmentation: Case Report and Program Review

With the establishment and growth of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) subspecialty, significant attention has been focused on clinical activities performed by EMS physicians in the out-of-hospital environment. An EMS fellowship includes special operations education to develop preparedness for responding to field situations requiring physician expertise. With only a thousand Board Certified EMS physicians in North America, EMS physicians may not be available 24 h per day to respond to field emergencies. Non-EMS physicians with minimal experience in prehospital or austere care may be called upon to respond to complex prehospital emergencies requiring advanced skills. The Los Angeles County EMS Agency implemented a policy in 1992 to establish Hospital Emergency Response Teams (HERT) as a regional resource to provide time-critical, specialized prehospital services within an EMS system. Activation of the HERT is rare, most frequently prompted by need for field amputation to enable extrication. We describe one such incident of a field intervention by HERT and detail the staffing, training, and equipment considerations within our large regional EMS system.

Achieving Equity in EMS Care and Patient Outcomes Through Quality Management Systems: A Position Statement

Improving health and safety in our communities requires deliberate focus and commitment to equity. Inequities are differences in access, treatment, and outcomes between individuals and across populations that are systemic, avoidable, and unjust. Within health care in general, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in particular, there are demonstrated inequities in the quality of care provided to patients based on a number of characteristics linked to discrimination, exclusion, or bias. Given the critical role that EMS plays within the health care system, it is imperative that EMS systems reduce inequities by delivering evidence-based, high-quality care for the communities and patients we serve. To achieve equity in EMS care delivery and patient outcomes, the National Association of EMS Physicians recommends that EMS systems and agencies: make health equity a strategic priority and commit to improving equity at all levels. assess and monitor clinical and safety quality measures through the lens of inequities as an integrated part of the quality management process. ensure that data elements are structured to enable equity analysis at every level and routinely evaluate data for limitations hindering equity analysis and improvement. involve patients and community stakeholders in determining data ownership and stewardship to ensure its ongoing evolution and fitness for use for measuring care inequities. address biases as they translate into the quality of care and standards of respect for patients. pursue equity through a framework rooted in the principles of improvement science.

Prehospital Care of Severely Intoxicated Patients by a Dutch Physician-Staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Retrospective Study

ObjectiveIntoxicated patients are often encountered by emergency medical services (eg, in cases of recreational drug use, accidental ingestion, or inhalation of toxic substances or [attempted] suicide). Earlier research showed that a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (P-HEMS) is regularly dispatched for intoxicated patients. However, it is still unclear if there is added value of P-HEMS compared with standard care provided by an ambulance crew. The aim of this study was to analyze the contribution of additional expertise and equipment that P-HEMS brings to the prehospital scene. MethodsIn this retrospective study, we searched the database of the helicopter emergency medical service Lifeliner 1 serving the northwestern quadrant of the Netherlands for cases that involved intoxications from January 2013 to July 2020. Patients were included in this study if the primary reason for P-HEMS dispatch was intoxication. The types of intoxication were categorized as (illicit/recreational) drug related, suicide attempt, or accidental. The agents were categorized as stimulants, depressants, hallucinogenic, cannabinoids, and other substances such as bleach or insulin. Patient characteristics, vital signs, and the therapeutic interventions performed were recorded for analysis. ResultsIn our study period, P-HEMS was dispatched 23,878 times. Of these dispatches, a total of 259 cases were included for further analysis. The majority of patients were male (64.5%). Sixty-six patients (25.5%) had an intoxication of depressant agents alone, whereas 60 patients (23.2%) had an intoxication with a combination of agents. With 159 (61.4%) patients, the majority of cases involved recreational drug intoxications. Unintentional intoxications were treated in 27 (10.4%) patients, whereas 73 (28.2%) cases involved suicide attempts. In 159 patients (61.4%), prehospital endotracheal intubation was required; the vast majority was performed by the helicopter emergency medical service physician. Specific antidotes were administered in 56 (21.6%) of the cases. ConclusionIn this study, we found that P-HEMS crews might complement usual prehospital care by ambulance crews for patients with severe intoxications by bringing advanced skills (eg, airway management and specific antidotes) to the scene.

Assessing Provider Understanding of Interfacility Emergency Medical Services Transport

Background: Interfacility transfer between hospitals is an integral component of regional healthcare systems. The decisions referring providers make regarding emergency medical services (EMS) level of care and transport modality (ground versus air) can dramatically impact patient care, emergency departments' workflow, hospital length of stay, and EMS resource availability. Limited research has been done to assess understanding of interfacility transport by emergency medicine providers. &#x0D; Methods: We developed six patient scenarios to test knowledge of level of care and mode of interfacility transfer. Seven board-certified EMS physicians determined the optimal answer to each patient scenario. We distributed a survey with the scenarios to regional healthcare partners via a database of persons who utilize or interface with interfacility transport services. We collected answers to the patient scenarios and provider characteristics (primary practice site, sex, age, specialty, years since graducation, provider degree, EMS training received). Descriptive statistics were performed and Fisher's exact tests described differences in correct answers as they varied by specialty (emergency medicine or other specialty), provider type (physician or advanced practice provider), and reported training in EMS level of care. &#x0D; Results: Seventy-six emergency medicine providers responded, including 68 physicians and 8 advanced practice providers. The mean total score on the case scenarios was 66%, with scores ranging from 33% to 100%. The mean scores on questions testing level of care and transport modality were 67% and 70%, respectively. No significant difference was found in test scores between emergency medicine and other specialties (p=0.718) or provider level of training (p=0.799). Training in EMS level of care was correlated with higher scores on the transport modality questions (p=0.003) but not on the level of care questions (p=0.231).&#x0D; Conclusion: Variability exists in the knowledge of providers on interfacility transport throughout the state. Emergency medicine providers could benefit from education on interfacility transfer resources.

Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors

AbstracBackgroundTreatment of acute pain is an essential element of pre-hospital care for injured and critically ill patients. Clinical studies indicate the need for improvement in the prehospital analgesia.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the current situation in out of hospital pain management in Germany regarding the substances, indications, dosage and the delegation of the use of analgesics to emergency medical service (EMS) staff.Material and methodsA standardized survey of the medical directors of the emergency services (MDES) in Germany was carried out using an online questionnaire. The anonymous results were evaluated using the statistical software SPSS (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney-U test).ResultsSeventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations.Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for “visceral colic-like pain” (55.8%).EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%).ConclusionEffective analgesics are available for EMS staff in Germany, the approach to improvement lies in the area of application. For this purpose, the adaptations of the legal framework as well as the creation of a guideline for prehospital analgesia are useful.

Consultation Processes With Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Physicians in Finnish Prehospital Emergency Care: The Paramedics’ Perspective

ObjectiveThe Finnish emergency medical services operates mainly with highly educated paramedic-staffed units. Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) physicians alongside other physicians provide consultations to paramedics on the scene without the physician physically participating in the mission. We examined the Finnish paramedics’ views regarding the consultation processes involving HEMS physicians. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study among paramedics (n = 200). Assessments of the performance of HEMS physicians and other physicians in the consultation process were analyzed descriptively. The effect of the physician being expressly part of the HEMS was analyzed with inductive content analysis. ResultsOverall, consultations with the HEMS physician were well received among paramedics, and the HEMS physicians received higher assessments than other physicians. The familiarity with the prehospital environment, limitations, and local possibilities was valued. Expertise is particularly valuable in challenging emergency medical services missions but unnecessary in many nonurgent missions. There is scope for improvement in the attitudes and technical fluency of the consultation processes of HEMS physicians. ConclusionUsing HEMS physicians in prehospital consultations could be recommended. Further studies are still needed to ensure the efficacy and efficiency of the consultation process and explore the integration of video connections into current consultation practices.

Ultrasound diagnostics in prehospital emergency care-do we need astandardized educational approach?

Limited diagnostic capabilities represent an ongoing obstacle in out-of-hospital emergency settings. Prehospital deployment of ultrasound might reduce this particular diagnostic gap. So far, little is known about the availability and usage of ultrasound in emergency medical services (EMS) or about the level of education of EMS physicians regarding prehospital ultrasound (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS). Anationwide survey was conducted among emergency physicians in Germany focusing on POCUS education and experience. Between 02/2022 and 05/2022, 1079responses were registered, of which 853complete responses were analyzed. Of the emergency physicians, 71.9% consider POCUS beneficial for out-of-hospital diagnostics and 43.8% had participated in acertified POCUS training prior to the survey. The self-evaluation of POCUS skills among emergency physicians depended significantly on their participation in acertified training (p < 0.001) and frequent ultrasound routine (p < 0.001). The majority of participating emergency physicians in Germany consider POCUS to improve out-of-hospital diagnostic capabilities. Participation in acertified POCUS training and frequent use of ultrasound facilitated higher self-confidence in POCUS skills.

Immobilization in Emergency Medical Service - Are CSR and NEXUS-Criteria Considered? A Matched-Pairs Analysis Between Trauma Patients Treated by Onsite EMS Physicians and Patients Treated by Tele-EMS Physicians.

The NEXUS-low-risk criteria (NEXUS) and Canadian C-spine rule (CSR) are clinical decision tools used for the prehospital spinal clearance in trauma patients, intending to prevent over- as well as under immobilization. Since 2014, a holistic telemedicine system is part of the emergency medical service (EMS) in Aachen (Germany). This study aims to examine whether the decisions to immobilize or not by EMS- and tele-EMS physicians are based on NEXUS and the CSR, as well as the guideline adherence concerning the choice of immobilization device. A single-site retrospective chart review was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were EMS physician and tele-EMS physician protocols with traumatic diagnoses. Matched pairs were formed, using age, sex and working diagnoses as matching criteria. The primary outcome parameters were the criteria documented as well as the immobilization device used. The evaluation of the decision to immobilize based on the criteria documented was defined as secondary outcome parameter. Of a total of 247 patients, 34% (n = 84) were immobilized in the EMS physician group and 32.79% (n = 81) in the tele-EMS physician group. In both groups, less than 7% NEXUS or CSR criteria were documented completely. The decision to immobilize or not was appropriately implemented in 127 (51%) in the EMS-physician and in 135 (54, 66%) in the tele-EMS physician group. Immobilization without indication was performed significantly more often by tele-EMS physicians (6.88% vs 2.02%). A significantly better guideline adherence was found in the tele-EMS physician group, preferring the vacuum mattress (25, 1% vs 8.9%) over the spineboard. It could be shown that NEXUS and CSR are not applied regularly, and if so, mostly inconsistently with incomplete documentation by both EMS- and tele-EMS physicians. Regarding the choice of the immobilization device a higher guideline adherence was shown among the tele-EMS physicians.

Recognition of Critically Ill Patients by Acute Health Care Providers: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Although the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) is increasingly being used in the acute care chain to recognize disease severity, its superiority compared with clinical gestalt remains unproven. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of medical caregivers and MEWS in predicting the development of critical illness. This was a multicenter observational prospective study. It was performed in a level-1 trauma center with two different sites and emergency departments (EDs) with a combined capacity of about 50.000 patients annually. It included all adult patients presented to the ED by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). None. For all patients, the acute caregivers were asked several standardized questions regarding clinical predicted outcome (clinical gestalt), and the MEWS was calculated. The primary outcome was the occurrence of critical illness, defined as ICU admission, serious adverse events, and mortality within 72 hours. The sensitivity, specificity, and discriminative power of both clinical gestalt and MEWS for the occurrence of critical illness were calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Among the total of 800 included patients, 113 patients (14.1%) suffered from critical illness. The specificity for predicting three-day critical illness for all caregivers (for EMS nurses, ED nurses, and physicians) was 93.2%; 97.3%, and 96.8%, respectively, and was significantly (p < 0.01) better than an MEWS score of 3 or higher (70.4%). The sensitivity was significantly lower for EMS and ED nurses, but not significantly different for physicians compared with MEWS. The AUROCs for prediction of 3-day critical illness by both the ED nurses (AUROC = 0.809) and the physicians (AUROC = 0.848) were significantly higher (p = 0.032 and p = 0.010, respectively) compared with MEWS (AUROC = 0.731). For patients admitted to the ED by EMS, medical professionals can predict the development of critical illness within 3 days significantly better than the MEWS. Although MEWS is able to correctly predict those patients that become critically ill, its use leads to overestimation due to a substantial number of false positives.

Epidemiological Analysis of the Emergency Vascular Access in Pediatric Trauma Patients: Single-Center Experience of Intravenous, Intraosseous, Central Venous, and Arterial Line Placements

Vascular access in severely injured pediatric trauma patients is associated with time-critical circumstances and low incidences, whereas only scarce literature on procedure performance is available. The purpose of this study was to analyze the performance of different vascular access procedures from the first contact at the scene until three hours after admission. Intubated pediatric trauma patients admitted from the scene to a single Level I trauma center between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed regarding intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) accesses, central venous catheterization (CVC) and arterial line placement. Sixty-five children with a median age of 14 years and median injury severity score of 29 points were included, of which 62 (96.6%) underwent successful prehospital IV or IO access by emergency medical service (EMS) physicians, while it failed in two children (3.1%). On emergency department (ED) admission, IV cannulas of prehospital EMS had malfunctions or were dislodged in seven of 55 children (12.7%). IO access was performed in 17 children without complications, and was associated with younger age, higher injury severity and higher mortality. Fifty-two CVC placements (58 attempts) and 55 arterial line placements (59 attempts) were performed in 45 and 52 children, respectively. All CVC and arterial line placements were performed in the ED, operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). Ten mechanical complications related to CVC placement (17.8%) and seven related to arterial line placement (10.2%) were observed, none of which had outcome-relevant consequences. This case series suggests that mechanical issues of vascular access may frequently occur, underlining the need for special preparedness in prehospital, ED, ICU and OR environments.

Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study)

Patient care in the prehospital emergency setting is error-prone. Wu's publications on the second victim syndrome made very clear that medical errors may lead to severe emotional injury on the caregiver's part. So far, little is known about the extent of the problem within the field of prehospital emergency care. Our study aimed at identifying the prevalence of the Second Victim Phenomenon among Emergency Medical Services (EMS) physicians in Germany. Web-based distribution of the SeViD questionnaire among n = 12.000 members of the German Prehospital Emergency Physician Association (BAND) to assess general experience, symptoms and support strategies associated with the Second Victim Phenomenon. In total, 401 participants fully completed the survey, 69.1% were male and the majority (91.2%) were board-certified in prehospital emergency medicine. The median length of experience in this field of medicine was 11 years. Out of 401 participants, 213 (53.1%) had experienced at least one second victim incident. Self-perceived time to full recovery was up to one month according to 57.7% (123) and more than one month to 31.0% (66) of the participants. A total of 11.3% (24) had not fully recovered by the time of the survey. Overall, 12-month prevalence was 13.7% (55/401). The COVID-19 pandemic had little effect on SVP prevalence within this specific sample. Our data indicate that the Second Victim Phenomenon is very frequent among prehospital emergency physicians in Germany. However, four out of ten caregivers affected did not seek or receive any assistance in coping with this stressful situation. One out of nine respondents had not yet fully recovered by the time of the survey. Effective support networks, e.g., easy access to psychological and legal counseling as well as the opportunity to discuss ethical issues, are urgently required in order to prevent employees from further harm, to keep healthcare professionals from leaving this field of medical care and to maintain a high level of system safety and well-being of subsequent patients.

Analysis of the primary utilization of videolaryngoscopy in prehospital emergency care in Germany.

In 2019, the German prehospital airway management guidelines were published. One of the recommendations was the primary utilization of videolaryngoscopy (VL) for every prehospital endotracheal intubation (phETI). Guideline compliance is extremely important in emergency medicine as non-compliance in the worst-case scenario leads to death. The study aims to quantify guideline compliance among emergency medical service (EMS) physicians and, subsequently to analyze subgroups influencing compliance. An online survey was developed and distributed as a hyperlink via email to all medical directors of EMS (n = 155) and the three main operators of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) in Germany. The survey was online from August1st 2021 until October3rd 2021. The primary outcome measure was the primary VL utilization. Data were evaluated descriptively. Amultivariate regression analysis was used to determine associations between the primary VL utilization and age, sex, educational level, specialization, phETI per year, operating field, VL device type, and guideline knowledge. The analysis included 698 EMS physicians. More than 55% of the EMS physicians do not primarily use avideolaryngoscope for phETI. Multivariate regression analysis showed asignificantly higher compliance if the devices C‑MAC® or McGrath® were on board, guidelines were known or EMS physicians were female. Age, educational level, specialization or prehospital intubation experience had no significant impact. The study shows non-compliance with prehospital airway management guidelines in Germany. The guideline recommendation is based on scientific evidence but is not yet generally accepted by all EMS physicians. Videolaryngoscope device type and sex seem to influence the primary VL utilization. Training for EMS physicians must be extended and individual prehospital airway management should be reconsidered by every EMS physician.

DO THE GUIDELINES GUIDE THE BELGRADE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE PHYSICIANS THROUGH THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION?

The aim of the study was to assess whether current guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in daily clinical practice are adequately applied in the Belgrade Emergency Medical Service (EMS). A retrospective research included 2,982 STEMI patients who were cared for by EMS teams. Therapy consisting of morphine, oxygen, nitroglycerin and aspirin (MONA) was applied. Dual antiaggregation therapy (aspirin 325 mg + ticagrelor 180 mg or clopidogrel 600 mg) was administered to patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) indicated. With electrocardiographic monitoring included, the patients were transported directly to PCI unit with announcement of the arrival. Response times I-V were measured. There was an increasing trend in the number of STEMI patients. A rapid increase in the use of dual antiaggregation therapy (MONA and clopidogrel or MONA and ticagrelor) was reported from year to year, as well as a dramatic increase in the use of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. The time from receiving the call to the arrival on the scene was 13.72 minutes, and the time from receiving the call to hospital arrival was 52.83 minutes. Our physicians care for STEMI patients in accordance with the current international and local recommendations.