Emergency Department Thoracotomy Research Articles

Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A National Trauma Databank analysis

IntroductionEmergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT) warrants further investigation in the pediatric population due to concerns about its futility. Our study evaluates how patient demographics, injury characteristics, and physiologic status influence pediatric EDT outcomes in blunt and penetrating trauma. MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients ≤19 years who received EDT within 1 hour of arrival to the ED from the National Trauma Data Bank. Cases were stratified by blunt and penetrating trauma. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to identify predictors of survival post-EDT. ResultsOf the 1,075 pediatric patients who underwent Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT), 79.6 % experienced penetrating trauma and 20.4 % blunt trauma, with survival rates at 25.9 % and 9.1 %, respectively. Survivors of penetrating trauma typically presented with more stable vital signs, such as pulse rate, oximetry, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and lower Injury Severity Scores (ISS), all correlating with survival (p < 0.05). Survivors of blunt trauma were distinguished by higher respiratory rates and temperatures (p < 0.05). Risk factor analysis indicated that age-adjusted bradycardia, age-adjusted hypotension, and pre-hospital cardiac arrest were significant predictors of mortality across trauma types (penetrating trauma: OR = 18.7, 6.2, and 20.7; blunt trauma: OR = 12, 2.69, and 6.4, all p < 0.05). Notably, pre-hospital respiratory support was associated with a reduced risk of mortality for both types of trauma (OR = 0.32 for penetrating, and OR = 0.23 for blunt, p < 0.05). ConclusionsThe study affirms the significance of pre-hospital care, showing that stable vitals and respiratory support enhance pediatric thoracotomy outcomes. Ongoing research into pediatric-specific trauma protocols are needed. Type of StudyRetrospective cohort Level of EvidenceIII

Challenging Dogma by Skipping the Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Database

IntroductionSurvival following emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) for patients in extremis is poor. Whether intervention in the operating room instead of EDT in select patients could lead to improved outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients who underwent intervention in the operating room would have improved outcomes compared to those who underwent EDT. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2021. All adult patients who underwent EDT, operating room thoracotomy (ORT), or sternotomy as the first form of surgical intervention within 1 h of arrival were included. Of patients without prehospital cardiac arrest, propensity score matching was utilized to create three comparable groups. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure. ResultsThere were 1865 EDT patients, 835 ORT patients, and 456 sternotomy patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were 349 EDT, 344 ORT, and 408 sternotomy patients in the matched analysis. On Cox multivariate regression, there was an increased risk of mortality with EDT versus sternotomy (HR 4.64, P < 0.0001), EDT versus ORT (HR 1.65, P < 0.0001), and ORT versus sternotomy (HR 2.81, P < 0.0001). Time to procedure was shorter with EDT versus sternotomy (22 min versus 34 min, P < 0.0001) and versus ORT (22 min versus 37 min, P < 0.0001). ConclusionsThere was an association between sternotomy and ORT versus EDT and improved mortality. In select patients, operative approaches rather than the traditional EDT could be considered.

The Role of Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Patients with Cranial Gunshot Wounds.

Although several society guidelines exist regarding emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), there is a lack of data upon which to base guidance for multiple gunshot wound (GSW) patients whose injuries include a cranial GSW. We hypothesized that survival in these patients would be exceedingly low. We used Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study (PTOS) data, 2002-2021, and included EDTs for GSWs. We defined EDT by ICD codes for thoracotomy or procedures requiring one, with a location flagged as ED. We defined head injuries as any head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥1 and severe head injuries as head AIS ≥ 4. Head injuries were "isolated" if all other body regions AIS < 2. Descriptive statistics were performed. Discharge functional status was measured in 5 domains. Over 20 years in Pennsylvania, 3,546 EDTs were performed, 2,771 (78.1%) for penetrating injuries. Most penetrating EDTs (2,003, 72.3%) had suffered GSWs. Survival among patients with isolated head wounds (n = 25) was 0%. Survival was 5.3% for the non-head-injured (n = 94/1,787). In patients with combined head and other injuries, survival was driven by the severity of the head wound - 0% (0/81) with a severe head injury (p = 0.035 vs no severe head injury), and 4.5% (5/110) with a non-severe head injury. Of the 5 head-injured survivors, 2 were fully dependent for transfer mobility, and 3 were partially or fully dependent for locomotion. Of 211 patients with a cranial injury who expired, 2 (0.9%) went on to organ donation. Though there is clearly no role for EDT in patients with isolated head GSWs, EDT may be considered in patients with combined injuries, as most of these patients have minor head injuries and survival is not different from the non-head-injured. However, if a severe head injury is clinically apparent, even in the presence of other body cavity injuries, EDT should not be pursued. Level II, retrospective observational cohort study.

Should an emergency physician be a "surgeon" in a rural area? A case of blunt cardiac rupture successfully treated by an emergency physician.

Blunt cardiac rupture is a life-threatening injury that requires surgical repair by cardiovascular or trauma surgeons. We report a case of blunt cardiac rupture in a rural area in which emergency physicians performed emergency department thoracotomy and surgical repair to save the patient's life. This case involved an 18-year-old female who was injured in a traffic accident and underwent emergency thoracotomy and surgical repair. The patient's left thorax was deformed, and sonographic assessment revealed pericardial effusion. She experienced cardiopulmonary arrest 13 min after hospital arrival. An emergency physician performed an emergency department thoracotomy. The clots were removed from the surface of the left ventricle, followed by wound compression to control bleeding from the ruptured left ventricular wall. After the recovery of spontaneous circulation, the emergency physician sutured the ruptured heart. The patient survived with good neurological function. In rural areas, blunt cardiac rupture may require emergency department thoracotomy and cardiac repair by emergency physicians. The establishment of educational systems that include continuous education on trauma surgical procedures and consensus guidelines is needed to assist rural emergency physicians in performing surgical procedures.

TiME OUT: Time-specific machine-learning evaluation to optimize ultramassive transfusion.

Ultramassive transfusion (UMT) is a resource-demanding intervention for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock, and associated mortality rates remains high. Current research has been unable to identify a transfusion ceiling or point where UMT transitions from lifesaving to futility. Furthermore, little consideration has been given to how time-specific patient data points impact decisions with ongoing high-volume resuscitation. Therefore, this study sought to use time-specific machine learning modeling to predict mortality and identify parameters associated with survivability in trauma patients undergoing UMT. A retrospective review was conducted at a Level I trauma (2018-2021) and included trauma patients meeting criteria for UMT, defined as ≥20 red blood cell products within 24 hours of admission. Cross-sectional data were obtained from the blood bank and trauma registries, and time-specific data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Time-specific decision-tree models predicating mortality were generated and evaluated using area under the curve. In the 180 patients included, mortality rate was 40.5% at 48 hours and 52.2% overall. The deceased received significantly more blood products with a median of 71.5 total units compared with 55.5 in the survivors ( p < 0.001) and significantly greater rates of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma at each time interval. Time-specific decision-tree models predicted mortality with an accuracy as high as 81%. In the early time intervals, hemodynamic stability, undergoing an emergency department thoracotomy, and injury severity were most predictive of survival, while, in the later intervals, markers of adequate resuscitation such as arterial pH and lactate level became more prominent. This study supports that the decision of "when to stop" in UMT resuscitation is not based exclusively on the number of units transfused but rather the complex integration of patient and time-specific data. Machine learning is an effective tool to investigate this concept, and further research is needed to refine and validate these time-specific decision-tree models. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Use of Low-Cost Task Trainer for Emergency Department Thoracotomy Training in General Surgery Residency Program

Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is an uncommon but potentially lifesaving procedure that warrants familiarity with anatomy, instruments, and indications necessary for completion. To address this need, we developed a low-cost EDT trainer. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a low-cost EDT trainer to teach emergency department thoracotomy with a discussion-based teaching session. Secondary objective was to study the face validity of the low-cost EDT trainer. A prospective 2-phase randomized control study was conducted. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. In phase one, baseline medical knowledge for both groups was assessed using a multiple-choice question pretest. In Group 1, each participant was taught EDT using a one-on-one discussion with a trauma surgeon, whereas Group 2 used the EDT trainer and debriefing for training. In phase 2 (1 month later), all participants completed a knowledge retention test and performed a videoed EDT using our EDT trainer, the video recordings were later reviewed by content experts blinded to the study participants using a checklist with a maximum score of 22. The participants also completed a reaction survey at the end of phase 2 of the study. OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, an urban tertiary care academic hospital in Columbus, Ohio. Nine senior surgery residents from training years 3 to 5. The mean score for the performance of the procedure for the simulation-based (Group 2) was significantly higher than that of the discussion-based (Group 1) (Rater 1: 21.2 ± 0.8 vs. 19.0 ± 2.0, p = 0.05, Rater 2: 20.4 ± 1.5 vs. 18.3±1.0, p = 0.04). Group 2 also was quicker than Group 1 in deciding to start the procedure by approximately 56 seconds. When comparing the mean pretest knowledge score to the mean knowledge retention score 30 days after training, the discussion-based group improved from 58.33% to 81.25% (p = 0.01); the simulation-trained group's scores remained at 68.33%. All the participants agreed or strongly agreed that the simulator provided a realistic opportunity to perform EDT and improved their confidence. The results of this pilot studysupport our hypothesis that using alow-cost EDT trainer effectively improves general surgery residents' confidence and procedural skills scores in a simulated environment. Further training with low-cost simulators may provide surgical residents with deliberate practice opportunities and improve performance when learning low-frequency procedures.

Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Penetrating Chest Trauma Patients with No Signs of Life: A Worthwhile Endeavor.

Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Penetrating Chest Trauma Patients with No Signs of Life: A Worthwhile Endeavor.

Potential harms of emergency department thoracotomy in patients with persistent cardiac arrest following trauma: a nationwide observational study

Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) was incorporated into traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (t-OHCA) resuscitation. Although current guidelines recommend EDT with survival predictors, futility following EDT has been demonstrated and the potential risks have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to elucidate the benefits and harms of EDT for persistent cardiac arrest following injury until hospital arrival. This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide trauma registry (2019–2021) and included adult patients with t-OHCA both at the scene and on hospital arrival. Survival to discharge, hemostatic procedure frequency, and transfusion amount were compared between patients treated with and without EDT. Inverse probability weighting using a propensity score was conducted to adjust age, sex, comorbidities, mechanism of injury, prehospital resuscitative procedure, prehospital physician presence, presence of signs of life, degree of thoracic injury, transportation time, and institutional characteristics. Among 1289 patients, 374 underwent EDT. The longest transportation time for survivors was 8 and 23 min in patients with and without EDT, respectively. EDT was associated with lower survival to discharge (4/374 [1.1%] vs. 22/915 [2.4%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.43 [95% CI 0.22–0.84]; p = 0.011), although patients with EDT underwent more frequent hemostatic surgeries (46.0% vs. 5.0%; adjusted OR, 16.39 [95% CI 12.50–21.74]) and received a higher amount of transfusion. Subgroup analyses revealed no association between EDT and lower survival in patients with severe chest injuries (1.0% vs. 1.4%; adjusted OR, 0.72 [95% CI 0.28–1.84]). EDT was associated with lower survival till discharge in trauma patients with persistent cardiac arrests after adjusting for various patient backgrounds, including known indications for EDT. The idea that EDT is the last resort for t-OHCA should be reconsidered and EDT indications need to be deliberately determined.Trial registration This study is retrospectively registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN ID: UMIN000050840).

The Success Rate of Emergency Department Thoracotomy for Emergency Penetrating Chest Trauma

Background and Aim: Trauma is considered one of the causes of mortality worldwide, among which chest injury is responsible for most of these deaths. This study aims to investigate the success rate of emergency thoracotomy in penetrating chest trauma in the emergency department of Shahid Beheshti and Farghani Hospital. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted retrospectively by reviewing the files of patients with penetrating trauma from 2011 to 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised all cases that underwent emergency thoracotomy with chest trauma. Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria were incomplete cases and cases that underwent thoracotomy for other reasons (such as non-emergency thoracotomy, open heart operation, or non-traumatic thoracotomy). In addition, the files of other patients who had underlying diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases were excluded from the study. The study variables, including age, gender, mechanism of trauma, the severity of the trauma, area of ​​trauma, vital signs on arrival, time to reach the operating room, and death or survival of patients were extracted from patient files and entered into the SPSS software, version 22. Finally, the data were analyzed by the Chi-square test and the paired t-tests. The significance level for all tests was considered 0.5. Results: The average age of the patients was 32.67±13.16 years and 50(34.7%) patients were female while 94(65.3%) patients were male. A total of 91(63.2%) patients died and 53(36.8%) patients survived. The average time from injury to thoracotomy in the emergency department was 20.4±8.9 minutes. Thoracotomy was successful in 19(13.2%) women and 94 (65.3%) men. No significant correlation was found between gender (P=0.82), the mechanism of injury (P=0.58), the severity of injury (P=0.27), and the location of injury (P=0.15). The referral method of patients with successful thoracotomy was not found (P=0.39). The average duration of patients reaching the hospital until thoracotomy was performed in the emergency department was 17.5±6.69 minutes among the patients who survived and 22.14±9.6 among the patients who died. A significant correlation was found between the time from the injury and thoracotomy and the success of thoracotomy in patients (P=0.03). Conclusion: Finally, the results showed as the average time between injury and thoracotomy gets shorter, the chance of success in thoracotomy increases.

Penetrating cardiac injury: a narrative review.

Penetrating cardiac trauma is rare but can cause life-threatening complications. Survival is dependent on prompt diagnosis and treatment. Given the low incidence and life-threatening implications, it is difficult to study in large prospective studies. The current literature regarding penetrating cardiac trauma comes primarily from large, experienced trauma centers and military sources. Understanding the history, current literature and even expert opinion can help with effectively treating injury promptly to maximize survival after penetrating cardiac trauma. We aimed to review the etiology and history of penetrating cardiac trauma. We review the prehospital treatment and initial diagnostic modalities. We review the incisional approaches to treatment including anterolateral thoracotomy, median sternotomy and subxiphoid window. The repair of atrial, ventricular and coronary injuries are also addressed in our review. The purpose of this paper is to perform a narrative review to better describe the history, etiology, presentation, and management of penetrating cardiac trauma. A narrative review was preformed synthesizing literature from MEDLINE and bibliographic review from identified publications. Studies were included based on relevance without exclusion to time of publication or original publication language. Sonographic identification of pericardial fluid can aid in diagnosis of patients too unstable for CT. Anterolateral thoracotomy should be used for emergent repairs and initial stabilization. A median sternotomy can be used for more stable patients with known injuries. Carefully placed mattress sutures can be useful for repair of injuries surrounding coronary vessels to avoid devascularization. Penetrating cardiac trauma is life threatening and requires prompt workup and treatment. Trauma algorithms should continue to refine and be clear on which patients should undergo an emergency department (ED) thoracotomy, median sternotomy and further imaging.

Outcomes of resuscitative and emergent thoracotomies following injury at the largest trauma center in Estonia.

An emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is performed in critically injured patients after a recent or in an imminent cardiac arrest following trauma. Emergent thoracotomy (ET) or operation room thoracotomy is reserved for more stable patients. However, the number of these interventions performed in an European settings is limited. Thus, we initiated the current study to investigate outcomes and risk factors for mortality of patients required EDT or ET at the largest trauma center in Estonia. All patients admitted after trauma to the North Estonia Medical Centre between 1/1/2017 and 31/12/2021 subjected to EDT or ET were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Overall, 39 patients were included. EDT and ET were performed in 16 and 23 patients, respectively. Median age was 45 (33-53) years and 89.7% were males. The crude 30-day mortality was 56.4% being 87.5% and 34.8% in the EDT and ET group, respectively. None of the patients with pre-hospital CPR requirement, severe head injury (AIS head ≥ 3) or severe abdominal injury (AIS abdomen ≥ 3) survived. All the patients in the survival group had signs of life in the emergency department. The rate of stab wounds was significantly higher in the survival group (p = 0.007). Patients with CGS < 9 had significantly lower possibility for survival (p < 0.001). EDT and ET outcomes in Estonian trauma system are comparable to similar advanced trauma systems in Europe. Patients with GCS > 8, signs of life in the ED and with isolated penetrating chest injury had the most favorable outcomes.

Penetrating right ventricular injury following a single gunshot to the left flank in Iraq: a case report

A century ago, cardiac injuries usually resulted in death. However, despite all the advances in medicine, these injuries still have high mortality and morbidity rates. In the present case, we describe a patient with a bullet injury to the right ventricle who survived at our hospital despite the limitations of our center with regard to modalities and equipment. A 30-year-old man was brought to our emergency department with a bullet wound to his left flank. He was hemodynamically unstable. After only 8 minutes in the hospital and without further investigations he was rushed to the operating room. During laparotomy, a clot was visible in the left diaphragm, which dislodged and caused extensive bleeding. The decision was made to perform a sternotomy in the absence of a sternal saw. An oblique 8-cm injury to the right ventricle was discovered following rapid exploration. It was repaired without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. After a few days in the hospital, the patient was discharged home. In the event of a penetrating cardiac injury, rapid decision-making is crucial for survival. Whenever possible, the patient should be transferred to the operating room, as emergency department thoracotomies are associated with a high mortality rate.

Emergency department thoracotomy in children: A Pediatric Trauma Society, Western Trauma Association, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma systematic review and practice management guideline.

The role of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy (EDT) in traumatically injured children has not been elucidated. We aimed to perform a systematic review and create evidence-based guidelines to answer the following PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) question: should pediatric patients who present to the emergency department pulseless (with or without signs of life [SOL]) after traumatic injuries (penetrating thoracic, penetrating abdominopelvic, or blunt) undergo EDT (vs. no EDT) to improve survival and neurologically intact survival? Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology, a group of 12 pediatric trauma experts from the Pediatric Trauma Society, Western Trauma Association, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma assembled to perform a systematic review. A consensus conference was conducted, a database was queried, abstracts and manuscripts were reviewed, data extraction was performed, and evidence quality was determined. Evidence tables were generated, and the committee voted on guideline recommendations. Three hundred three articles were identified. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for guideline creation, providing 319 pediatric patients who underwent EDT. No data were available on patients who did not undergo EDT. For each PICO, the quality of evidence was very low based on the serious risk of bias and serious or very serious imprecision. Based on low-quality data, we make the following recommendations. We conditionally recommend EDT when a child presents pulseless with SOL to the emergency department following penetrating thoracic injury, penetrating abdominopelvic injury and after blunt injury if emergency adjuncts point to a thoracic source. We conditionally recommend against EDT when a pediatric patient presents pulseless without SOL after penetrating thoracic and penetrating abdominopelvic injury. We strongly recommend against EDT in the patient without SOL after blunt injury.

Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Trauma

Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Trauma

Emergency department versus operating room intubation of patients undergoing immediate hemorrhage control surgery.

Hemorrhage control surgery is an essential trauma center function. Airway management of the unstable bleeding patient in the emergency department (ED) presents a challenge. Premature intubation in the ED can exacerbate shock and precipitate extremis. We hypothesized that ED versus operating room intubation of patients requiring urgent hemorrhage control surgery is associated with adverse outcomes at the patient and hospital-levels. Patients who underwent hemorrhage control within 60 minutes of arrival at level 1 or 2 trauma centers were identified (National Trauma Data Bank 2017-2019). To minimize confounding, patients dead on arrival, undergoing ED thoracotomy, or with clinical indications for intubation (severe head/neck/face injury or Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤8) were excluded. Two analytic approaches were used. First, hierarchical logistic regression measured the risk-adjusted association between ED intubation and mortality. Secondary outcomes included ED dwell time, units of blood transfused, and major complications (cardiac arrest, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, sepsis). Second, a hospital-level analysis determined whether hospital tendency ED intubation was associated with adverse outcomes. We identified 9,667 patients who underwent hemorrhage control surgery at 253 trauma centers. Patients were predominantly young men (median age, 33 years) who suffered penetrating injuries (71%). The median initial Glasgow Coma Scale and systolic blood pressure were 15 and 108 mm Hg, respectively. One in five (20%) of patients underwent ED intubation. After risk-adjustment, ED intubation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality, longer ED dwell time, greater blood transfusion, and major complications. Hospital-level analysis identified significant variation in use of ED intubation between hospitals not explained by patient case mix. After risk adjustment, patients treated at hospitals with high tendency for ED intubation (compared with those with low tendency) were significantly more likely to suffer in-hospital cardiac arrest (6% vs. 4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.03). Emergency department intubation of patients who require urgent hemorrhage control surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. Significant variation in ED intubation exists between trauma centers not explained by patient characteristics. Where feasible, intubation should be deferred in favor of rapid resuscitation and transport to the operating room. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Close to zero preventable in-hospital deaths in pediatric trauma patients – An observational study from a major Scandinavian trauma center

BackgroundIn line with international trends, initial treatment of trauma patients has changed substantially over the last two decades. Although trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children globally, in-hospital pediatric trauma related mortality is expected to be low in a mature trauma system. To evaluate the performance of a major Scandinavian trauma center we assessed treatment strategies and outcomes in all pediatric trauma patients over a 16-year period. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients under the age of 18 years admitted to a single institution from 1st of January 2003 to 31st of December 2018. Outcomes for two time periods were compared, 2003–2009 (Period 1; P1) and 2010–2018 (Period 2; P2). Deaths were further analyzed for preventability by the institutional trauma Mortality and Morbidity panel. ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 3939 patients. A total of 57 patients died resulting in a crude mortality of 1.4%, nearly one quarter of the study cohort (22.6%) was severely injured (Injury Severity Score > 15) and mortality in this group decreased from 9.7% in P1 to 4.1% in P2 (p<0.001). The main cause of death was brain injury in both periods, and 55 of 57 deaths were deemed non-preventable. The rate of emergency surgical procedures performed in the emergency department (ED) decreased during the study period. None of the 11 ED thoracotomies in non-survivors were performed after 2013. ConclusionA dedicated multidisciplinary trauma service with ongoing quality improvement efforts secured a low in-hospital mortality among severely injured children and a decrease in futile care. Deaths were shown to be almost exclusively non-preventable, pointing to the necessity of prioritizing prevention strategies to further decrease pediatric trauma related mortality.

Emergency department thoracotomy in a physician-staffed trauma system: the experience of a French Military level-1 trauma center.

To investigate survival after emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system. This single-center retrospective study included allin extremistrauma patients who underwent EDT between 2013 and 2021 in a military level 1 trauma center.CPR time exceeding 15 minutes for penetrating trauma of 10 minutes for blunt trauma, and identified head injury were the exclusion criteria. Thirty patients (73% male, 22/30) with a median age of 42 y/o [27-64], who presented mostly with polytrauma (60%, 18/30), blunt trauma (60%, 18/30), and severe chest trauma with a median AIS of 4 3-5 underwent EDT. Mean prehospital time was 58min (4-73). On admission, the mean ISS was 41 29-50, and 53% (16/30) of patients had lost all signs of life (SOL) before EDT. On initial work-up, Hb was 9.6g/dL [7.0-11.1], INR was 2.5 [1.7-3.2], pH was 7.0 [6.8-7.1], and lactate level was 11.1 [7.0-13.1] mmol/L. Survival rates at 24h and 90days after penetrating versus blunt trauma were 58 and 41% versus 16 and 6%, respectively. If SOL were present initially, these values were 100 and 80% versus 22 and 11%. Among in extremis patients supported in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system, implementation of a trauma protocol with EDT resulted in overall survival rates of 33% at 24h and 20% at 90days. Best survival was observed for penetrating trauma or in the presence of SOL on admission.

How we do it Emergency Department Thoracotomy for Penetrating Pulmonary Trauma.

Abstract&#x0D; The manuscript specifically concentrates on patients with penetrating thoracic trauma, who having undergone Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT) have been diagnosed with injury to the lung. Its purpose is to describe a practical / heuristic approach, enabling the inexperienced in thoracic surgery doctor, to perform a successful EDT and if need arises, a definitive operation in the absence of a Cardiothoracic or appropriately trained Trauma Surgeon.

A national evaluation of emergency department thoracotomy practices: Will a high-risk, low-yield procedure reveal potential management practice bias?

BackgroundEmergency department thoracotomy is often performed on patients in extremis from traumatic exsanguination. Thus, inherent biases may play a role in whether or not the emergency department thoracotomy is performed. We aimed to investigate race, socioeconomic status, and gender disparities in the use of emergency department thoracotomy and to investigate outcomes of these patients to assess for possible surgeon practice bias. MethodA nationwide retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use Profile 2016–2018. Adult patients who suffered blunt, penetrating, or other injuries secondary to falls/firearms/motor vehicle collision/other mechanisms of injury and presented to a trauma center pulseless, with or without signs of life after injury. Rates of thoracotomy, time to thoracotomy, transfer to operating room, emergency department disposition, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, complications, mortality, and hospital disposition. Univariate analyses and adjusted multivariable regression were performed to account for confounders with significance defined as P < .05. ResultsA total of 6,453 patients were analyzed. Emergency department thoracotomy and mortality were significantly higher in minorities and uninsured patients, even after risk adjustment. There were no differences in timing among race groups to emergency department thoracotomy. White/Caucasian patients experienced the highest rate of emergency department initial disposition to the intensive care unit (10.3%, P < .0001) and lowest mortality rate (89.2%, P < .0001). ConclusionSurgeon bias was not seen in the practice of emergency department thoracotomy for patients arriving pulseless. However, poorer outcomes were associated with minorities and lower socioeconomic status patients. Thoracotomy rates were higher in minorities and lower socioeconomic status patients due to more penetrating trauma.

Outcomes of Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Pediatric Gunshot Victims: Designation Matters

Outcomes of Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Pediatric Gunshot Victims: Designation Matters