Emergency Department Radiologists Research Articles

Can clinicians identify community-acquired pneumonia on ultralow-dose CT? A diagnostic accuracy study

BackgroundWithout increasing radiation exposure, ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) of the chest provides improved diagnostic accuracy of radiological pneumonia diagnosis compared to a chest radiograph. Yet, radiologist resources to rapidly report the chest CTs are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of emergency clinicians’ assessments of chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia using a radiologist’s assessments as reference standard.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Ten emergency department clinicians (five junior clinicians, five consultants) assessed chest ultralow-dose CTs from acutely hospitalised patients suspected of having community-acquired pneumonia. Before assessments, the clinicians attended a focused training course on assessing ultralow-dose CTs for pneumonia. The reference standard was the assessment by an experienced emergency department radiologist. Primary outcome was the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities consistent with community-acquired pneumonia. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using generalised estimating equations.ResultsAll clinicians assessed 128 ultralow-dose CTs. The prevalence of findings consistent with community-acquired pneumonia was 56%. Seventy-eight percent of the clinicians’ CT assessments matched the reference assessment. Diagnostic accuracy estimates were: sensitivity = 83% (95%CI: 77–88), specificity = 70% (95%CI: 59–81), positive predictive value = 80% (95%CI: 74–84), negative predictive value = 78% (95%CI: 73–82).ConclusionThis study found that clinicians could assess chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia with high diagnostic accuracy. A higher level of clinical experience was not associated with better diagnostic accuracy.

Update on establishing and managing an overnight emergency radiology division

Emergency department (ED) radiology divisions that serve to provide overnight attending coverage have become an increasingly common feature of radiology departments. The purpose of this article is to review the common ED radiology coverage models, describe desirable traits of emergency radiologists, and discuss workflow in the ED radiology setting. ED radiologists may be trained as ED radiologists or may develop the necessary skills and adopt the subspecialty. Choosing radiologists with the correct traits such as being a “night owl” and remaining calm under pressure and implementing an acceptable work schedule such as shift length of 9–10 h and a “one week on, two weeks off” schedule contribute to sustainability of the position. Strategies to address the unique stressors and workflow challenges of overnight emergency radiology coverage are also presented. Workflow facilitators including trainees, PAs, radiology assistants, and clerks all have roles to play in managing high case volumes and in making sure that the service is well staffed. Usage of artificial intelligence software is the latest technique to streamline workflow by identifying cases which should be prioritized on a busy worklist. Implementing such strategies will maintain quality of care for patients regardless of time of day as well as sustainability and quality of life for overnight emergency radiologists.

Post hemorrhoidectomy complications: CT imaging findings

IntroductionWe aimed to describe computed tomography (CT) findings of early complications after interventional hemorrhoid treatments in emergency department (ED) patients. Materials and methodsWe identified all ED patients requiring abdominal and/or pelvic CT between February 2012 and February 2019, and included only patients who underwent CT for suspected early (up to 30 days) post hemorrhoidectomy procedure complications. Presenting symptoms, salient CT findings and clinical outcomes were collected. ResultsOverall, 48,425 abdominal and/or pelvic CTs were performed. Of these, we identified 12 patients (8 male, 4 female) who underwent CT in our ED following hemorrhoidectomy procedures. At presentation, peri-anal or abdominal pain was the most common symptom. One patient presented with hemodynamic instability.CT findings included proctitis (4/12), rectal perforation (2/12), peri-anal abscess (1/12) and peri-anal fistula (1/12). Two of the patients with proctitis presented with significant submucosal edema.On follow-up, three patients required intensive care hospitalization, and two of those underwent emergent laparotomy. The third patient died due to secondary infection during his hospitalization. ConclusionHemorrhoidectomy procedures may result in severe complications which should be recognized by ED radiologists. These complications carry a potential risk for significant clinical consequences. Both clinicians and radiologists should be aware of the possibility of such complications when patients present to the ED early after hemorrhoid procedures.

Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Compression: MRI Primer for Emergency Department Radiologists.

The occurrence of acute myelopathy in a nontrauma setting constitutes a medical emergency for which spinal MRI is frequently ordered as the first step in the patient's workup. The emergency department radiologist should be familiar with the common differential diagnoses of acute myelopathy and be able to differentiate compressive from noncompressive causes. The degree of spinal cord compression and presence of an intramedullary T2-hyperintense signal suggestive of an acute cord edema are critical findings for subsequent urgent care such as surgical decompression. Importantly, a delay in diagnosis may lead to permanent disability. In the spinal canal, compressive myelopathy can be localized to the epidural, intradural extramedullary, or intramedullary anatomic spaces. Effacement of the epidural fat and the lesion's relation to the thecal sac help to distinguish an epidural lesion from an intradural lesion. Noncompressive myelopathy manifests as an intramedullary T2-hyperintense signal without an underlying mass and has a wide range of vascular, metabolic, inflammatory, infectious, and demyelinating causes with seemingly overlapping imaging appearances. The differential diagnosis can be refined by considering the location of the abnormal signal intensity within the cord, the longitudinal extent of the disease, and the clinical history and laboratory findings. Use of a compartmental spinal MRI approach in patients with suspected nontraumatic spinal cord injury helps to localize the abnormality to an epidural, intradural extramedullary, or intramedullary space, and when combined with clinical and laboratory findings, aids in refining the diagnosis and determining the appropriate surgical or nonsurgical management.Online supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2019.

New CT-based diagnoses of torso cancer is low in the emergency department setting.

The incidence of new CT-based torso cancer diagnoses and the most commonly diagnosed cancer types in the emergency department (ED) setting are unknown. The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence and types of new CT-based torso cancer diagnoses in the ED. A total of 19,496 CT reports including all or parts of the torso from 2017 were searched for the keywords: "mass", "tumor", "neoplasm", "malignancy", or "cancer". Each report and corresponding medical record was evaluated for presence of a new cancer. Cases were scored as no cancer, subcentimeter lung nodule, known cancer, new cancer, or suspicious, but unconfirmed for new cancer. Each mass was characterized as symptom-related or incidental. At least one keyword was found in 2086 reports. Of these 706, 126 and 905 were known cancer cases, subcentimeter lung nodules, and non-cancerous cases, respectively. There were 251 confirmed new cancers and 98 suspicious cases which lacked adequate diagnostic workup. Depending on whether only definite or definite and suspicious cases were included together, the number of new cancer cases per 100 torso CT exams was 1.3 or 1.8, respectively. Gastrointestinal, lung, pancreaticobiliary, urinary, and gynecologic cancers were most common. Only 58 of the confirmed cases (23%) were deemed as incidental findings. CT-diagnosis of new torso cancers was uncommon in our setting. Still, while extensive knowledge of cancer staging may not be necessary for ED radiologists, knowledge of the most common types of cancer including gastrointestinal, lung, pancreaticobiliary, urinary, and gynecologic cancers may improve sensitivity for these diagnoses and may expedite appropriate referrals for the newly diagnosed patients.

Acute Radiologic Manifestations of America's Opioid Epidemic.

The United States is in the midst of an opioid use epidemic, which has severe medical, social, and economic consequences. Addictions to and abuse of prescription and illicit opioids are increasing, and emergency department radiologists are increasingly being faced with the task of examining patients who present with opioid-related complications. These complications may be the result of direct drug toxicity or nonsterile injection of the drugs. Neurologic, musculoskeletal, cardiopulmonary, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal complications may be evident at diagnostic imaging in emergent settings. Heroin-induced leukoencephalopathy, cerebral septic emboli, mycotic arterial aneurysms, soft-tissue infections, and infective endocarditis are some of the conditions that patients may be found to have after they present to the emergency department. In this article, the above topics, including clinical features, pathophysiology, imaging findings, and treatment options, are reviewed. Recognizing the limitations of diagnostic imaging modalities that are available to radiologists is equally important, as some conditions can be successfully diagnosed after the initial triage-for example, transesophageal echocardiography can be performed to diagnose infective endocarditis. The emergency department radiologist may be responsible for identifying acute conditions, which can be life threatening. Some of the more common emergent opioid-related conditions and complications are reviewed, with specific emphasis on cases in which emergency department radiologists encounter conditions for which additional expertise is required. Becoming familiar with the conditions directly related to the current opioid epidemic will enable the diagnosis of these entities in a timely and accurate manner. ©RSNA, 2018.

Abdominal radiograph pearls and pitfalls for the emergency department radiologist: a pictorial review.

Abdominal plain films are often the first imaging examination performed on a patient with abdominal pain in the emergency department. Radiograph findings can help guide clinical management and the need for advanced imaging. A pictorial review of a range of abdominal radiograph findings is presented, including bowel gas patterns, abdominal organ evaluation, pathologic gas, calcifications, implanted devices, and foreign bodies.

Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

The aim of this study was to assess for an association between radiologists' turnaround time (TAT) and report quality for emergency department (ED) abdominopelvic CT examinations. Reports of 60 consecutive ED abdominopelvic CT studies from five abdominal radiologists (300 total reports) were included. An ED radiologist, abdominal radiologist, and ED physician independently evaluated satisfaction with report content (1-10 scale), satisfaction with report clarity (1-10 scale), and extent to which the report advanced the patient on a previously published clinical spectrum scale (1-5 scale). TAT (time between completion of imaging and completion of the final report) and report quality were compared between radiologists using unpaired t tests; associations between TAT and report quality scores for individual radiologists were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. The five radiologists' mean TAT varied from 35 to 53 min. There were significant differences in report content in half of comparisons between radiologists by observer 1 (p ≤ 0.032) and in a minority of comparisons by observer 2 (p ≤ 0.047), in report clarity in majority of comparisons by observer 1 (p ≤ 0.031) and in a minority of comparisons by observer 2 (p ≤ 0.010), and in impact on patient care in a minority of comparisons for all observers (p ≤ 0.047). There were weak positive correlations between TAT and report content and clarity for three radiologists for observer 1 (r = 0.270-0.362) and no correlation between TAT and any report quality measure for remaining combinations of the five radiologists and three observers (r = -0.197 to +0.181). While both TAT and report quality vary between radiologists, these two factors were not associated for individual radiologists.

To determine the accuracy of focused assessment with sonography for trauma done by nonradiologists and its comparative analysis with radiologists in emergency department of a level 1 trauma center of India

Background:Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an important skill during trauma resuscitation. Use of point of care ultrasound among the trauma team working in emergency care settings is lacking in India.Objective:To determine the accuracy of FAST done by nonradiologists (NR) when compared to radiologists during primary survey of trauma victims in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center in India.Materials and Methods:A prospective study was done during primary survey of resuscitation of nonconsecutive patients in the resuscitation bay. The study subjects included NR such as one consultant emergency medicine, two medicine residents, one orthopedic resident and one surgery resident working as trauma team. These subjects underwent training at 3-day workshop on emergency sonography and performed 20 supervised positive and negative scans for free fluid. The FAST scans were first performed by NR and then by radiology residents (RR). The performers were blinded to each other's sonography findings. Computed tomography (CT) and laparotomy findings were used as gold standard whichever was feasible. Results were compared between both the groups. Intraobserver variability among NR and RR were noted.Results:Out of 150 scans 144 scans were analyzed. Mean age of the patients was 28 [1-70] years. Out of 24 true positive patients 18 underwent CT scan and exploratory laparotomies were done in six patients. Sensitivity of FAST done by NR and RR were 100% and 95.6% and specificity was 97.5% in both groups. Positive predictive value among NR and RR were 88.8%, 88.46% and negative predictive value were 97.5% and 99.15%. Intraobserver performance variation ranged from 87 to 97%.Conclusion:FAST performed by NRs is accurate during initial trauma resuscitation in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center in India.

Recommendations for additional imaging on emergency department CT examinations: comparison of emergency- and organ-based subspecialty radiologists

Past studies have identified a high frequency of recommendations for additional imaging (RAI) for computed tomography (CT) studies performed in an emergency department (ED), thereby potentially contributing to increased imaging utilization and costs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of RAI within the ED setting between ED-based and organ-based subspecialty radiologists. We identified 600 ED CT studies, comprising 200 head, chest, and abdominal CT studies, split equally between cases reviewed by ED-based and organ-based radiologists. Frequency of RAI for the three examinations was compared between these subspecialty groups. Frequencies of RAI were 21.5 %, 13.5 %, and 5.5 % for CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and brain, respectively. There was a significantly higher frequency of RAI for chest CT studies interpreted by chest radiologists than by ED radiologists (28.0 % vs. 15.0 %, respectively, p = 0.036), largely due to a higher rate of RAI for incidentally detected lung nodules and masses as well as other pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities by chest radiologists. There was no significant difference in RAI on brain or abdominal CT studies between the two groups (p = 0.426-1.0). However, on abdominal studies, only ED-based radiologists provided RAI for abnormalities of the bowel or uterus, while only organ-based radiologists provided RAI for pancreatic abnormalities. Only 25.6 % of RAI were subsequently performed at our institution. For chest CT studies performed at the authors' institution, differences in management of incidental pulmonary nodules contributed to a significantly higher frequency of RAI by chest radiologists than by ED-based radiologists. Further investigation of the impact of these differences on cost and patient outcomes is warranted.

Kidney–pancreas transplantation

For patients with diabetes, insulin therapy can be an effective treatment for years. However, many diabetics eventually develop complications from the disease, including neuropathy, amputations, atherosclerosis, and kidney failure. While kidney failure can be managed with dialysis, difficulties with monitoring fluid intake and diet, bone loss, anemia, and venous access can be problematic for the patient. Due to the decreased life expectancy and difficulties of medical management of patients with diabetes and renal failure, combined renal-pancreas transplantation is an increasingly used option available to type 1 diabetics with concurrent renal failure due to refinements of surgical technique and immunosuppressive therapy. Due to the increasing number of kidney-pancreas transplant patients, longer post-transplant survival, and increasing number of hospitals performing the procedure, more transplant patients are having their care increasingly shifted away from the major transplant centers to general community hospitals. In many kidney-pancreas transplants patients who present to the emergency department for suspected transplant dysfunction, imaging plays a critical initial role in their diagnosis and management. Therefore, it has become increasingly important that community and emergency department radiologists be able to recognize the normal imaging appearance of renal-pancreas transplants and to identify acute findings.

Introducing Medical Students to Radiology as Paid Emergency Department Triage Assistants

The aim of this report is to provide a detailed description of a program employing medical students to assist with triaging off-hour diagnostic imaging studies at a major academic medical center. Current and former participants of the Medical student Emergency Department (ED) Radiology Triage Program were interviewed regarding the inception, development, and impact of this program. Student participation and triage activities were compiled and tabulated from scheduling records and triage assistant call logs. Opportunities for medical students to obtain an intensive, well-organized experience in radiology are often absent or occur relatively late during medical school, which can be problematic for developing basic imaging literacy and for making timely, well-informed decisions regarding radiology as a career path. The authors describe a program that provides students with a rigorous, hands-on experience in radiology relatively early in their training by employing medical students to assist the emergency department radiology staff with managing off-hour radiology workflow. Students work with the off-hour emergency department radiologists and staff members answering phone calls and help to facilitate the ordering and protocoling of studies and the dissemination of results to clinicians. The employment of medical student triage assistants provides in-depth exposure to clinical radiology relatively early in medical school, while providing an effective system to help streamline the off-hour workflow for attending radiologists, residents, technicians, and support staff members.

Are “Normal” Multidetector Computed Tomographic Scans Sufficient to Allow Collar Removal in the Trauma Patient?

Controversy continues as to the most safe and reliable method for clearing the cervical spine (C-spine) in a trauma patient who is rendered unable to participate in a clinical examination. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive test to detect soft-tissue injuries, it is impractical for routine use in every patient largely because of its cost and time of acquiescence. Recent studies have advocated the sole use of multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) scans of the C-spine to decide if cervical collar immobilization can be discontinued. The current investigation retrospectively reviewed a series of MDCT scans obtained after an acute traumatic event that were used to direct treatment in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit. Seven-hundred and eight trauma patients consecutively admitted to the ED between June 2001 and July 2006 underwent a computed tomographic scan of their C-spine as part of an institutional protocol. We identified 91 patients with MDCT scans that were officially recorded as adequate and negative by an attending ED radiologist who had also undergone an MRI during the same trauma admission period. Retrospectively, two fellowship-trained spine surgeons independently reviewed these MDCT studies to address the following questions: (1) Is the study adequate? (2) Is it suggestive of an acute injury? (3) Is there sufficient information to safely recommend collar removal? Institutional Review Board approval was obtained before the images were reviewed. Neither clinical examination findings nor MRI readings were made available to the surgeon evaluators. Both spine surgeons agreed that 76 of the 91 studies (84%) were adequate to evaluate for possible C-spine injuries. Seven of 91 MDCT scans (8%) were deemed inadequate by both surgeons (95% confidence interval, 2.3-13.1). Reasons for inadequacy included motion artifact, insufficient visualization of the cervical-thoracic or occipital-cervical junctions, incomplete reconstructive views, or poor quality. Three of the adequate MDCT scans had fractures that were identified by both of the spine surgeons; 4 additional fractures and 15 findings suspicious for instability were identified by at least one of the surgeons. Ultimately, 22 of 91 MDCT scans read as adequate and normal by attending radiologists were deemed suspicious for abnormality by the spine surgeons. Of these 22 cases, the official MRI reading was positive for a trauma-related abnormality in 17 cases. C-spine clearance of patients without the ability participate in a clinical examination remains difficult. A multidisciplinary, algorithmic approach generally yields the most consistent results. However, our data highlight that reliance on a single imaging modality may lead to missed diagnosis of C-spine injuries. These data suggest that early involvement of the spine service for radiographic clearance may help identify occult injuries or suspicious findings necessitating further evaluation.