Abstract Introduction In our institution separate care pathways exist for patients presenting with major trauma and acute abdomen (AA). Trauma patients activate a Consultant led trauma team attendance on arrival and CT imaging within 30 minutes where indicated. Our acute abdomen pathway attracts ST3+ general surgical review within 2 hours of emergency department referral and CT within a further 1 hour. We aimed to compare the two laparotomy cohorts with respect to clinical outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients that underwent an emergency laparotomy following CT at our institution between December 2020 and February 2022. Patients were identified from the NELA and TARN databases. Results 66 trauma and 64 AA patients were identified. The mean time to CT in trauma was 56.1 minutes ± 24.8 and in AA 390.7 minutes ± 306.1 (p<0.001). There was no difference in length of ITU stay (mean days 3.1 ± 8.1 vs 4.2 ±9.8 p=0.260) or hospital stay (mean days 13.7 ± 19.2 vs 13.8 ±11.7 p=0.494). no correlation between time to CT and length of hospital stay (r=0.233 p=0.97) or ITU stay (r=0.224 p=0.964) in trauma patients or AA (r=0.217 p=0.58 and -0.001 p=0.562 respectively for hospital and ITU stays) was detected. However, there was a trend towards lower mortality in the trauma cohort (3% vs 7.8% p=0.227). Conclusion Trauma patients were scanned quicker than acute abdomen presentations likely due to greater personnel resource and better care pathways. This was associated with a trend towards lower mortality because of earlier pathology detection and Consultant directed care from hospital arrival.
Read full abstract