Emergency Department Chief Complaint Research Articles

Sex and Age Differences in Atypical Chief Complaints for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in Emergency Department Visits.

Around one million United States emergency department (ED) visits annually are due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) symptoms. Characterizing ED symptom presentation of ADHF patients may improve clinical care, yet sex and age differences in ED chief complaints have not been thoroughly investigated. This paper aims to describe differences in chief complaints and comorbid conditions for ED patients with a ADHF diagnosis, stratified by sex and age. Retrospective analysis of adults presenting to North Carolina EDs in NC DETECT, a statewide syndromic surveillance system, between 2010 and 2016 with a diagnosis of ADHF. Frequencies of chief complaint categories for ED visits and comorbid conditions, stratified by sex and age, were evaluated and standardized differences computed. Top chief complaints were dyspnea (19.1%), chest pain (13.5%), and other respiratory complaints (13.4%). In the 18-44 age group, females when compared to males reported more nausea/vomiting (6.7% versus 4.1%) and headache (4.2% versus 2.0%). In those 45-64 and 65+ years old, complaints were similar by sex. When stratified by age group alone, the 18-44 and 45-64 age groups had more complaints of chest pain, whereas balance issues, weakness, and confusion were more common in the 65+ age group. Sex and age differences in atypical ADHF symptoms were seen in in ED patients with ADHF. Characterizing variation of ADHF symptoms in ED patients can inform the identification of ED patients with ADHF and the management of ADHF-related symptoms.

Diagnostic testing for chest pain in a pediatric emergency department and rates of cardiac disease before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study.

Chest pain is a common chief complaint in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to increase the risk of cardiac disease. It remains unclear how COVID-19 changed how pediatric emergency clinicians approach patients presenting with chest pain. The goal of this study was to characterize the diagnostic testing for chest pain in a pediatric ED before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a retrospective study of children between the ages of 2-17 years presenting to a pediatric ED from 1/1/2018-2/29/2020 (Pre-COVID-19) and 3/1/2020-4/30/2022 (COVID-19) with chest pain. We excluded patients with a previous history of cardiac disease. Of the 10,721 encounters during the study period, 5,692 occurred before and 5,029 during COVID-19. Patient demographics showed minor differences by age, weight, race and ethnicity. ED encounters for chest pain consisted of an average of 18% more imaging studies during COVID-19, including 14% more EKGs and 11% more chest x-rays, with no difference in the number of echocardiograms. Compared to Pre-COVID-19, 100% more diagnostic tests were ordered during COVID-19, including cardiac markers Troponin I (p < 0.001) and BNP (p < 0.001). During COVID-19, 1.1% of patients had a cardiac etiology of chest pain compared with 0.7% before COVID-19 (p = 0.03). During COVID-19, pediatric patients with chest pain underwent more diagnostic testing compared to Pre-COVID-19. This may be due to higher patient acuity, emergence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) that necessitated more extensive testing and possible changes in ED clinician behavior during COVID-19.

Effective Natural Language Processing Algorithms for Early Alerts of Gout Flares from Chief Complaints

Early identification of acute gout is crucial, enabling healthcare professionals to implement targeted interventions for rapid pain relief and preventing disease progression, ensuring improved long-term joint function. In this study, we comprehensively explored the potential early detection of gout flares (GFs) based on nurses’ chief complaint notes in the Emergency Department (ED). Addressing the challenge of identifying GFs prospectively during an ED visit, where documentation is typically minimal, our research focused on employing alternative Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to enhance detection accuracy. We investigated GF detection algorithms using both sparse representations by traditional NLP methods and dense encodings by medical domain-specific Large Language Models (LLMs), distinguishing between generative and discriminative models. Three methods were used to alleviate the issue of severe data imbalances, including oversampling, class weights, and focal loss. Extensive empirical studies were performed on the Gout Emergency Department Chief Complaint Corpora. Sparse text representations like tf-idf proved to produce strong performances, achieving F1 scores higher than 0.75. The best deep learning models were RoBERTa-large-PM-M3-Voc and BioGPT, which had the best F1 scores for each dataset, with a 0.8 on the 2019 dataset and a 0.85 F1 score on the 2020 dataset, respectively. We concluded that although discriminative LLMs performed better for this classification task when compared to generative LLMs, a combination of using generative models as feature extractors and employing a support vector machine for classification yielded promising results comparable to those obtained with discriminative models.

Safety profile of the most ordered medications for breastfeeding patients in the emergency department

BackgroundEmergency Medicine (EM) physicians routinely treat breastfeeding patients. Physicians frequently recommend pumping and dumping milk for perceived safety risks. We hypothesized that the majority of the most commonly ordered medications in the emergency department (ED) are safe for breastfeeding patients. Accordingly, we performed a comprehensive safety analysis of the commonly ordered medications and provided an algorithm for EM physicians to utilize when treating breastfeeding patient in the ED. MethodsWe investigated the 90 most administered medications to female patients between the ages of 15 to 50 for common ED chief complaints at a tertiary care academic medical center from January 2018 to December 2022. A total of 145,960 doses were analyzed. We subsequently searched LactMed®, InfantRisk Application, and Pubmed® for all safety information on these medications and divided them by categories. Ultimately, we proposed a treatment algorithm for breastfeeding patients in the ED. ResultsAnalgesics were the most commonly ordered medications in the ED, and importantly analgesics ranging from ibuprofen to morphine are safe in limited doses in the ED setting. Antibiotics and antifungals pose limited restrictions. All systems-based medications have a variety of safe options available. Lastly, supplements and electrolytes are safe. ConclusionThe majority of medications utilized in the acute setting are compatible with breastfeeding. There should be limited circumstances to advise pumping and dumping in the ED.

Diagnostic test performance of Amsterdam wrist rules in diagnosing wrist fracture in adults with wrist trauma

Abstract:&#x0D; Objective: Wrist trauma is a common chief complaint in emergency departments and radiography is used to make the diagnosis. Excessive usage of radiographs would utilize resources, exert risk of radiation exposure, and overcrowding. Amsterdam wrist rules (AWR) have been proposed as a tool for clinical decision-making regarding the need for wrist fracture diagnosis. This study assessed the diagnostic test performance of this rule in wrist trauma for wrist fracture.&#x0D; Methods: All patients over 18 years old with the chief complaint of acute wrist trauma were included. They were excluded if Glascow coma scale (GCS) was below 15, needed emergency surgery without an X-ray, and had a history of wrist fracture in the past 3 months. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained and the AWR predictors were assessed before going to the radiology unit. The presence of a fracture of the distal radius was confirmed by treating emergency physician or radiologist.&#x0D; Results: 205 participants were recruited in this study, of which 6 patients (2.9%) were excluded due to missing data. The median age was 40 (IQR: 30-50) and 74 (37.2%) patients were female. There were 66 (33.2%) patients with a wrist fracture, which distal radius accounted for most of them. The AWR had sensitivity and specificity of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.49,0.87) and 1 (95% CI: 0.92,1), respectively. Although the negative likelihood ratio of AWR was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16,0.54), the positive likelihood ratio was infinite. The positive predicted value was 1 (95% CI: 0.80,1), whereas the negative predictive value was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74,0.94).&#x0D; Conclusion: The AWR showed great specificity and positive predictive. It had fair sensitivity, negative predictive value, and negative likelihood ratio for diagnosis of wrist fracture in patients with wrist trauma.

Reasons for emergency department visits of patients with opioid use disorder at an urban safety-net hospital: A retrospective records review

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the emergency department (ED) visit chief complaints and discharge diagnoses of patients with an opioid use disorder (OUD) empaneled to a primary care clinic.&#x0D; Design: ED visits were retrospectively reviewed through electronic health records. Patients with a history of using multiple substances and medical or psychiatric conditions were compared to those without these conditions.&#x0D; Setting: This study was conducted at Harbor-UCLA ED, a safety-net level one trauma center.&#x0D; Patients and participants: Eligible participants were empaneled to the Harbor-UCLA Family Health Center with a diagnosis of OUD between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020.&#x0D; Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures included number of ED visits, hospital admissions, chief complaints, and discharge diagnoses.&#x0D; Results: The total number of patients was 59. The most common chief complaints were musculoskeletal (34 percent), gastrointestinal (18 percent), general (13 percent), and skin (8.6 percent). The most common discharge diagnoses were musculoskeletal (27 percent), gastrointestinal (20 percent), infectious (11 percent), substance use disorder related (11 percent), psychiatric (7 percent), and cardiovascular (7 percent). Co-occurring alcohol use was associated with a higher number of visits, 3.18 versus 1.15 (p = 0.021), and a higher percentage of patients with frequent visits, 46 percent versus 8 percent (p = 0.008). Patients with diabetes had more frequent visits, 40 percent versus 10 percent (p = 0.036), and were more likely to be admitted, 43 percent versus 15 percent (p = 0.010).&#x0D; Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of screening and the management of alcohol use and diabetes among patients with OUD.

Unplanned Emergency Department Visits Following Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: Incidences, Risk Factors, and Mortalities

BackgroundThe incidence of unplanned emergency department (ED) visits following revision total joint arthroplasty is an indicator of the quality of postoperative care. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidences, timings, and characteristics of ED visits within 90 days after revision total joint arthroplasty. MethodsA retrospective review of 457 consecutive cases, including 254 revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and 203 revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) cases, was conducted. Data regarding patient demographics, timings of the ED encounter, chief complaints, readmissions, and diagnoses indicating reoperation were analyzed. ResultsThe results showed that 41 patients who had rTHA (16.1%) and 14 patients who had rTKA (6.9%) returned to the ED within 90 days postoperatively. The incidence of ED visits was significantly higher in the rTHA group than in the rTKA group (P = .003). The most common surgery-related complications were dislocation among rTHA patients and wound conditions among rTKA patients. Apart from elevated calculated comorbidity scores, peptic ulcer in rTHA patients and cerebral vascular events and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rTKA patients might increase chances of unplanned ED visits. Patients who had ED visits showed significantly higher mortality rates than the others in both rTHA and rTKA cohorts (P = .050 and P = .008, respectively). ConclusionsThe ED visits within 90 days are more common after rTHA than after rTKA. Patients in both ED visit groups after rTHA and rTKA demonstrated worse survival. Efforts should be made to improve quality of care to prevent ED visits.

Presyndromic surveillance for improved detection of emerging public health threats.

Existing public health surveillance systems that rely on predefined symptom categories, or syndromes, are effective at monitoring known illnesses, but there is a critical need for innovation in "presyndromic" surveillance that detects biothreats with rare or previously unseen symptomology. We introduce a data-driven, automated machine learning approach for presyndromic surveillance that learns newly emerging syndromes from free-text emergency department chief complaints, identifies localized case clusters among subpopulations, and incorporates practitioner feedback to automatically distinguish between relevant and irrelevant clusters, thus providing personalized, actionable decision support. Blinded evaluations by New York City's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene demonstrate that our approach identifies more events of public health interest and achieves a lower false-positive rate compared to a state-of-the-art baseline.

2.128 Psychiatric Emergency Department Chief Complaints and Wait Times in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Review of a Large Massachusetts Hospital System

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an unprecedented impact on global mental health, with children, adolescents, and young adults noted to be particularly vulnerable to its effects. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19’s impact on the mental health of this population within a large Massachusetts hospital system.

77 Results of a Novel National Emergency Department Chief Complaint Database

77 Results of a Novel National Emergency Department Chief Complaint Database

22 Efficacy of Emergency Department-Initiated 14-Day Ambulatory ECG Patch Monitors in Patients With Unexplained Syncope

Syncope is a common and costly emergency department (ED) chief complaint. Unfortunately, more than 50% of high-risk syncope patients do not follow up for further outpatient cardiac monitoring following ED or hospital discharge. Leadless and wireless ECG patch monitors are now widely available for ambulatory cardiac monitoring. We initiated a protocol in which ED physicians were given the option of discharging patients with a diagnosis of syncope with a 14-day ambulatory ECG monitor (AEM) placed by ED staff.

27 Combining Machine Learning and Network Science to Cluster Emergency Department Chief Complaints and Diagnoses

Study Objectives: Improvements to electronic health record (EHR) systems have enabled the adaptation of emergency care practice to incorporate discrete data capture of chief complaints and clinical diagnoses. However, the number of distinct data elements for complaints and diagnoses is very large. In this study, we sought to apply data science approaches (including network science and unsupervised machine learning) to identify clusters of complaints and diagnoses in the emergency department (ED).

Incidental Radiology Findings on Computed Tomography Studies in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

An incidental finding is defined as a newly discovered mass or lesion detected on imaging performed for an unrelated reason. The identification of an incidental finding may be an opportunity for the early detection of a serious medical condition, including a malignancy. However, little is known about the prevalence of incidental findings in the emergency department (ED) setting and the strategies that can be used to mitigate the risk associated with them in the ED. This study aimed to estimate the overall prevalence of incidental findings and to summarize the currently described measures to mitigate the risks associated with incidental findings. On November 22, 2020, a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus was performed for studies that were published in peer-reviewed journals and reported the prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomography (CT) scans in patients in the ED. Patients who received CT scans that included the head, neck, chest, or abdomen/pelvis were included. The study characteristics, overall prevalence of incidental findings, prevalence of incidental findings by body region, and prespecified subgroups were extracted. The criteria used for risk stratification within individual studies were also extracted. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 1,385 studies were identified, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies represented 147,763 ED encounters or radiology reports across 16 countries, and 83% of studies were observational, cross-sectional studies. A total of 35 studies (50.7%) were in trauma patients. A large degree of heterogeneity was observed across the included studies. The overall pooled prevalence estimate for any incidental finding was 31.3% (95% confidence interval 24.4% to 39.1%). We found great variation in the methods described to mitigate the risk associated with incidental findings, including a lack of standardized risk stratification, inconsistent documentation practices, and only a small subset of studies describing prospective interventions aimed at improving the recognition and management of incidental findings from the ED. In patients in the ED receiving CT scans, incidental findings are commonly encountered across a broad range of ED chief complaints. This review highlights the existence of great heterogeneity in the definitions used to classify incidental findings. Future studies are needed to determine a clinically feasible categorization standard or terminology for commonly encountered incidental findings in the ED setting to standardize classification and documentation.

Computerized history taking improves HEART score determination in acute chest pain patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Robert Bosch Stiftung (Stuttgart, Germany) Region Stockholm (ALF project; Stockholm, Sweden) Introduction Chest pain is a common chief complaint in emergency departments (EDs). The Acute Cardiovascular Care Association recommends the use of History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) score for risk stratification. In hectic and overcrowded EDs computerized history taking (CHT) is one structured way for collecting the components of HEART score, which include medical history (H- and R-variables). Purpose To determine the proportion of acute chest pain patients where CHT can be used to calculate HEART score, and what interrater reliability the included variables have with physician acquired medical history. Methods Prospective cohort study with acute chest pain patients self-reporting medical histories using a CHT program (Clinical Expert Operating System, CLEOS) on a tablet. CLEOS, with &amp;gt;17,000 decision nodes, mimics a physician interview and tailors each interview continuously depending on previous answers. Clinically stable women and men aged &amp;gt;18 years with a chief complaint of chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG or serum markers for acute coronary syndrome were enrolled. Patients unable to carry out a CHT interview (e.g., severe impaired vision or confusion) were excluded. As recommended in regional guidelines a modified HEART score using the traditional classification of anginal symptoms, i.e. 1) central chest pain, 2) provoked by physical exertion and/or emotional stress, and 3) relieved by rest and/or nitrates, and traditional risk factors was used (see Table 1). Observations to each discrete H- and R-variable and medical history data were extracted from electronic health records (EHR) and the CHT database by the research staff. Cohen’s kappa statistics and interpretation according to Landis &amp; Koch was used to describe the interrater reliability. Results A total of 1,000 consecutive patients were enrolled in one tertiary university hospital ED during 2017–2019 (mean age 55±17 years; 54% women), comparable to the general chest pain population (mean age 58±19 years; 50% women). A complete HEART score could be calculated in 60% of patients (H-variable 91%; R-variable 60%). Registered observations from EHR and CHT and interrater reliability data are presented in Table 1. Interrater reliability for the H-variable (classical anginal symptoms) was slight to moderate (kappa 0.19-0.44) and the R-variable (traditional risk factors) was moderate to almost perfect (kappa 0.56-0.88). Conclusions HEART score could be calculated in a majority of acute chest pain patients by the use of CHT. Interrater reliability was high for traditional risk factors but low to moderate for classical anginal symptoms. Our ongoing studies assess whether CHT combined with a risk score such as HEART score in an acute setting can be useful for improved risk stratification and, more important, to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical Presentations and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in the treatment of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may cause a wide-range of autoimmune toxicities referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a paucity of data regarding the presentations and outcomes of patients receiving ICIs who seek care in an emergency department (ED). We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving an ICI who presented to a tertiary care ED between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018. Data including ED chief complaint, diagnosis, treatment, and disposition were collected along with baseline characteristics and diagnosis at the time of outpatient oncology follow-up. We report descriptive statistics summarizing the characteristics of the cohort. There were 98 ED visits identified among 67 unique patients. Immune-related adverse events were diagnosed in 16 (16.3%) cases. The most common chief complaints within the irAE group were gastrointestinal symptoms 10 (62.5%). Among the 16 confirmed irAE cases, the most common irAE diagnosed was colitis 9 (56.3%). Two (12.5%) patients with irAEs received corticosteroids during their stay in the ED, and 10 (62.5%) patients with irAEs required hospital admission. Emergency medicine providers documented consideration of an irAE in the differential diagnosis in 14.3% of all ED visits and in 43.8% of visits in which an irAE was ultimately diagnosed. Emergency providers should be familiar with ICIs given their expanding use and potential adverse effects to improve early recognition and patient outcomes in ED settings.

170 Emergency Department Chief Complaints Among Older Adults With and Without Alzheimer’s Disease or Related Dementias in Years Before and After Diagnosis

The Emergency Department (ED) is a common site of care for older adults including those with Alzheimer’s disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). Chief complaints may provide valuable early information to hasten triage, diagnostic workup, and care; however, studies have been limited in ADRD. We characterized chief complaints of patients with and without ADRD presenting to the ED in the years prior to and after diagnosis. This was a retrospective observational analysis of the chief complaints of Medicare beneficiaries who received care within the ED at two large healthcare systems in New York, NY and Chicago, IL over a six-year period (2010-2015). ED visit encounter data from electronic health records (EHRs) of both healthcare systems were linked to beneficiary Medicare Fee-for-service claims. Chief complaints were abstracted from EHRs and grouped into 82 different categories. We identified diagnosis of ADRD through ICD diagnoses in inpatient and outpatient claims and ADRD-related prescriptions. We report the prevalence of each chief complaint category among beneficiaries with ADRD, before and after ADRD diagnosis, and at each ED location. We identified 57,204 Medicare beneficiaries who had a total of 151,053 ED visits across the two hospital systems over the 6-year period. One in four patients (N=14,991; 25.3%) had a diagnosis of ADRD or received ADRD-related prescription during the observation period. These patients accounted for 31.8% of all ED visits (12.4% prior to diagnosis; 19.4% after ADRD diagnosis). Among the top 10 chief complaints, altered mental status (4.3% vs. 1.3%), fall (6.4% vs. 4.7%), psychiatric disturbance (2.89% vs. 1.69%), and weakness (4.3% vs. 3.1%) were more common among patients with ADRD compared to beneficiaries without ADRD. On the contrary, chief complaints of any pain (9.9% vs. 7.1%), chest pain (7.7% vs. 4.6%), abdominal related (6.1% vs. 4.4%), and dizziness (2.9% vs. 2.0%) were more common among non-ADRD patients. These differences were observed up to 2 years prior to diagnosis with an increase in number and percentage of ED visits with chief complaints of alerted mental status, falls, and weakness in the 6 months prior to diagnosis of ADRD. These patterns were consistent across sites. Patients with ADRD and cognitive impairment encompass a significant portion of older adults presenting to the ED. Chief complaints of patients with ADRD are more likely to present with geriatric syndromes and altered mental status, even before diagnosis is documented. Chief complaints may be a feasible way to recognize and triage older adults to geriatric and ADRD services needed to foster higher quality ED and post-ED care.

Ocular trauma in the pediatric emergency departments, characteristics and risk factors of immediate sequelae

ObjectiveThis study assesses the clinical characteristics and epidemiology of children with eye trauma presenting to the Emergency Department in Spain and analyze the risk factors associated with immediate sequelae. MethodsA multicentric prospective case series study conducted during 24 months of patients presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Departments in five hospitals collaborating with the Spanish Pediatric Emergency Research Group. Data were collected from October 2016 through September 2018, including all patients up to the age of 16 years old presenting to the Emergency Department with an ocular trauma. All injuries were classified by Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). ResultsA total of 242 134 visits to the Emergency Departments took place during the study period, being 1007 ocular traumas (0,42%; IC 95% 0,40−0,45) and 858 were included in the study. Most commonly, injuries occurred while playing (54,7%), except in the 15 or more-age group, in which sports activities were more common (23,1%). The place of the trauma varied depending on the age group, being home (34,7%) and schools or sports areas (34,3%) the most recurrent. Blunt objects were the most frequent mechanism of trauma (48,6%). Most of the injuries were classified as closed globe (85,5%), mainly contusions (52,7%). Fifty-eight patients (6,8%) presented with immediate sequelae, being the impairment of visual acuity the most common (70,7%). The risk factors associated with immediate sequelae were the 10 or more-age group, the preexisting refractive errors, the open globe injuries and the injuries with blunt objects. ConclusionsOcular trauma is a frequent chief complaint in the Pediatric Emergency Departments in Spain. Increasing awareness of the serious nature of ocular injuries and the study of the risk factors will help to develop a comprehensive plan for educating both parents and children to minimize preventable eye injuries sequelae.

Ocular trauma in the Pediatric Emergency Departments, characteristics and risk factors of immediate sequelae

This study assesses the clinical characteristics and epidemiology of children with eye trauma presenting to the Emergency Department in Spain and analyze the risk factors associated with immediate sequelae. A multicentric prospective case series study conducted during 24 months of patients presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Departments in five hospitals collaborating with the Spanish Pediatric Emergency Research Group. Data were collected from October 2016 through September 2018, including all patients up to the age of 16 years old presenting to the Emergency Department with an ocular trauma. All injuries were classified by Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology. A total of 242,134 visits to the Emergency Departments took place during the study period, being 1,007 ocular traumas (0.42%; IC 95% 0.40-0.45) and 858 were included in the study. Most commonly, injuries occurred while playing (54.7%), except in the 15 or more-age group, in which sports activities were more common (23.1%). The place of the trauma varied depending on the age group, being home (34.7%) and schools or sports areas (34.3%) the most recurrent. Blunt objects were the most frequent mechanism of trauma (48.6%). Most of the injuries were classified as closed globe (85.5%), mainly contusions (52.7%). Fifty-eight patients (6.8%) presented with immediate sequelae, being the impairment of visual acuity the most common (70.7%). The risk factors associated with immediate sequelae were the 10 or more-age group, the preexisting refractive errors, the open globe injuries and the injuries with blunt objects. Ocular trauma is a frequent chief complaint in the Pediatric Emergency Departments in Spain. Increasing awareness of the serious nature of ocular injuries and the study of the risk factors will help to develop a comprehensive plan for educating both parents and children to minimize preventable eye injuries sequelae.

Geriatric emergency department revisits after discharge with Potentially Inappropriate Medications: A retrospective cohort study.

To determine whether Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) prescribed in an academic emergency department (ED) are associated with increased ED revisits in older adults. A retrospective chart review of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older, discharged from an academic ED (January 2012 - November 2015) with any PIMs versus no PIMs. PIMs were defined using Category 1 of the 2015 Updated Beers criteria. Primary outcomes, obtained from a Medicare database linked to hospital ED subjects, were ED revisits 3 and 30 days from index ED discharge. Adjusted multiple logistic regression was used with entropy balance weighted covariates: Age in years, Gender, Race, Number of discharge medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, Emergency Severity Index scores (ESI), Chief Complaint, Medicaid status, and prior 90 Day ED visits. Over the study period, there were a total of 7,591 Medicare beneficiaries 65+ discharged from the ED with a prescription; 1,383 (18%) received one or more PIMs. ED revisits in 30 days were fewer for the PIMs cohort (12% PIMs vs 16% no PIMs, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 - 0.95, P value <0.005). Hospital admissions in 30 days were fewer for the PIMs cohort (4 PIMs vs 7% no PIMs, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56 - 1.00, P value <0.005). In addition to PIMs, covariate risk factors associated with ED revisits in 30 days included comorbidity severity, history of prior ED revisits, chief complaint, and Medicaid status. Risk factors associated with hospitalization in 30 days included those plus age and emergency severity index, but not race nor ethnicity. Patients discharged from the ED receiving potentially inappropriate medications as defined by Category 1 of the 2015 updated Beers criteria had lower odds of revisiting the ED within 30 days of index visit. Sociodemographic factors such as gender and race did not predict ED revisits or hospital admissions. Clinical characteristics predicted ED revisits and hospital admissions, the strongest risk being increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index score followed by triage acuity and chief complaint. Future studies are needed to delineate the implications of our findings.

Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain.

Acute chest pain is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint. Evaluating patients for acute coronary syndrome is challenging because missing the diagnosis carries substantial morbidity, mortality, and medicolegal consequences. However, over-testing is associated with increased cost, overcrowding, and possible iatrogenic harm. Over the past two decades, multiple risk scoring systems have been developed to help emergency providers evaluate patients with acute chest pain. The ideal risk score balances safety by achieving high sensitivity and negative predictive value for major adverse cardiovascular events while also being effective in identifying a large proportion of patients for early discharge from the ED. This review examines contemporary risk scores used to risk stratify patients with acute chest pain.