Emergency Department Admission Research Articles

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of IV Morphine for Burn Pain Management in the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.

The management of pain following a burn is extremely complex because of the multifactorial nature of burn pain (nociceptive and neuropathic). In the pre-hospital setting and emergency department (ED), the main goal of acute pain management is to reduce the patient's pain, allowing them to maintain function and to prevent the chronification of pain. Opioids are used as first-line treatment in management of burn pain. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) morphine for burn pain management in the ED and to evaluate pain management in the pre-hospital setting. In this single-center observational study, patients presenting with second- and third-degree burns were enrolled in our ED. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were performed at ED admission and after 1h. Pain medications administered before arrival in the ED were reported by the rescue team. All patients received IV acetaminophen every 8h and IV morphine according NRS. Thirty patients were included in this study. At the time of arrival to the ED, > 90% of the patients reported severe pain; 95.8% of them received IV morphine to achieve pain relief. After 1h, > 65% of patients had NRS < 3. The total amount of IV morphine was 18.12 ± 4.26mg in the first hour. No adverse events were recorded. The BSPAS on admission to the ED was 34.8 ± 5.6, indicating severe anxiety. After 1h, BSPAS was 12.8 ± 4.8, indicating mild anxiety. IV morphine used for burn pain management in the emergency setting significantly improves patient outcomes in terms of pain. IV morphine also reduced anxiety scores at 1h.

Procedural heart rate variability and its effect on short-term symptoms after cardioneuromodulation procedure

Abstract Background Syncope is a miscellaneous clinical condition that affects a large portion of the population every year all over the world and responsible for a considerable amount of hospital and particularly emergency department admissions (1) The use of a right-sided approach in catheter ablation of ganglion plexi (GP) has been applied to reduce syncope episodes caused by vasovagal syncope (VVS) and decrease the overall burden of syncope (2). Purpose Our aim is to show that right-sided GP ablation which is known as cardioneuromodulation (CNM) is a new and promising way to cease recurrent syncope episodes and assess its effects on heart rate (HR), P-P intervals, ventricular depolarisation/repolarization parameters (QRS,QTc,Tpe durations, QTc/Tpe ratio), recurrence of syncope episodes, and patients symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, etc. We also aimed to identify changes between pre and post procedural heart rates and its effects on short-term symptoms during follow-up. Methods A group of 55 patients with positive tilt table response or recurrent vasovagal syncope with pauses &amp;gt;2 sec in holter monitoring was enrolled this study. During the EP study, GPs determined both anatomically and by EP stimulation then autonomic denervation was performed focused by radiofrequency ablation. All patients followed-up for 12 months. Results Right-sided ablation was performed during the procedure and HR increased significantly in all patients after the procedure compared to before. Syncope episodes of the patients decreased significantly after the procedure. The patients who did not complain of syncope at the first, second and third appointment, respectively, 76.4% (n:42), 90.9% (n:50) and 92.7% (n:51). Patients had complaints at most within the first 4 months after the procedure (Table-1). At the first appointment, 4 (7.3%) patients had syncope and 9 (16,4%) patients had sinus tachycardia. Patient group with heart rate variability varying more or less than 20% during the procedure were examined, 81% of those with HR variability &amp;lt;20% did not have any symptoms, while 64.7% of the group with HR variability above 20% did not have any symptoms at first appointment (p:0,461) (Table.2). Tachycardia was seen in 23.5% of those with HR variability &amp;gt;20%, while it was determined as 9.5% in those with a HR variability &amp;lt;20 % Although these comparisons do not show a statistically significant difference due to the number of few patients, it is clinically significant. The same relationship was not observed between HR variability and symptoms in the second and third appointments. Conclusion Cardioneuromodulation is a remarkable treatment modality and it should be taken into consideration that more symptoms may develop in the early post-procedural period in the group who has post-procedure heart rate variability over 20%, and a cut-off should be determined for the target heart rate during the procedure.Table-1Table-2

Risk of death and thromboembolic events in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias admitted to the emergency department

Abstract Background Few data are available on the risk of death and thromboembolism in patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Purpose To assess the risk of adverse events in SVT patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). Methods Retrospective study utilizing a global federated health research network (TriNetX). Based on the ICD codes recorded at the ED admission, patients were categorized in: SVT (I41.1), atrial fibrillation (AF, I48.0,1,2,91), atrial flutter (I48.3,4,92), and a control group with palpitations (R00.2) without arrhythmias (CTRL). Primary outcome was the 1-year risk of a composite of all-cause death and thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral arterial embolism). Secondary outcomes were the 1-year risk of each component of the composite outcome. Cox-regression analysis was used to produce hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The exploratory analysis was performed to assess the risk of first episode of thromboembolism. Other sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the results of the main analysis in patients ≥65 years, with multimorbidity, and not on oral anticoagulation (OAC). Results We identified 37,793 SVT patients (58.5±19.2 years, 55.8% females), 239,490 AF patients (70±19.2 years, 47.3% females), 20,674 atrial flutter patients (68.6±15.1, 15.1% females), and 89,152 CTRL (43.5±17.8 years, 60.1% females). Before PSM, in SVT patients the mean age and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was lower than AF and atrial flutter patients but higher than CTRL. After PSM, no difference was found among the three groups. After PSM, the risk of composite outcome in SVT patients was higher compared to CTRL (HR 2.80, 95%CI 2.61-3.00), similar to atrial flutter patients (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.03), and a lower compared to AF patients (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.82-0.88) (Figure 1). These results were consistent also for the secondary outcomes, for the risk of the first thromboembolic event (Figure 2), and in all the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion SVT patients have a risk of death and thromboembolism comparable to those with atrial flutter, but lower than AF. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible beneficial effect of OAC in this clinical context.Figure 1Figure 2

Proactive care for frailty

Many providers aspire to scale up proactive care that prevents escalation of health and care needs, delays onset of disability, and reduces demand for emergency department attendance or admission to hospital or care home. NHS England offers guidance on personalised and coordinated multi-professional support and interventions for people with moderate or severe frailty. This article reflects on the growing international evidence for an integrated proactive approach for older people with frailty and why investing in high-quality, joined-up care for older people across the whole system improves outcomes for people, reduces demand for services, increases system resilience, and delivers economic and societal benefits. Facing up to frailty requires creative whole system workforce planning and development that will be challenging to deliver in the current financial and recruitment context yet all the more worthwhile as scaling up proactive care has the potential to be a game changer.

The impact of different anticoagulants and antiplatelets regimens on acute epistaxis outcomes.

The impact of anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (AP) on the management of acute epistaxis remains unclear. This study investigated the association between AC/AP therapy and treatment outcomes in patients with acute epistaxis. A retrospective analysis of patients presented to the otolaryngology emergency room with acute epistaxis (2014-2022). Patients were categorized based on their regular medications: AP, dual AP therapy (DAPT), new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), or no regular AC/AP use (control group). Outcome measures included rates of minor interventions (chemical or electrical cautery, nasal tamponade), major interventions (endoscopic ligation, embolization), recurrent emergency department visits, admission rates, and duration. 786 patients were included with an average follow-up period of 52.56 ± 20.4 months. Compared to the control group, patients on AP, DAPT, or VKA had significantly higher rates of minor interventions (63.1% vs. 74.4%, 79.6%, and 77.3%, respectively, p < 0.05). DAPT users exhibited a higher rate of major interventions than the control (5.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.053). NOAC users showed no significant difference in minor interventions compared to control and required no major interventions. Both NOAC and VKA users had significantly higher rates of recurrent epistaxis events and prolonged hospitalization compared to the control (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). NOAC demonstrated more favorable outcomes than VKA in patients with acute epistaxis, and DAPT use was associated with an increased need for major interventions. These findings suggest a more conservative approach in NOAC users than other AC/AP agents.

#2317 Did acute kidney injury confer greater mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients? A Portuguese hospital experience in the third COVID wave

Abstract Background and Aims The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which originated in December 2019, had a huge impact on healthcare worldwide. Numerous studies have reported alterations in kidney function among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, such as hematuria, proteinuria, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Histopathology exams in autopsies have identified various potential causes for the presence of AKI in these patients, with reports linking AKI to unfavorable outcomes across multiple countries. However, additional data concerning hospitalized COVID patients in Portugal are essential to further understand this aspect. Method Retrospective cohort study enrolling adult patients, who attended the Emergency Department and recorded positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results for SARS-CoV-2 from January 1 to January 31, 2021. AKI was diagnosed using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) classification based on serum creatinine (sCr) criteria and using a background creatinine available in the patient record. We performed an analysis of incidence, lethality, and possible risk factors of AKI in COVID-19 patients. Results The study encompassed a cohort of 239 patients, of whom 62 (25.94%) received a diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) based on KDIGO criteria. Within this subgroup, the average age was 77.65 years (±12.07), with a total of 29 male patients (46.78%). Notably, 30 deaths (48.39%) occurred during the hospital stay in this group. Regarding the AKI classification, 39 patients (62.9%) were classified as KDIGO-AKI stage 1, 14 patients (22.58%) as stage 2, and 9 patients (14.52%) as stage 3. Regarding the timing of the diagnosis of AKI, 54 (87%) occurred in the moment of admission, 7 patients (11.3%) were diagnosed within the first 48 hours and a solitary case (1.6%) was diagnosed after 7 days of hospitalization. In the non-AKI group, the mean age was 69.86 years (±15.95), and approximately 55% were male. Within this group, 49 deaths (27.7%) were recorded during hospitalization. Significantly higher mortality rates were observed in the AKI group, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (p &amp;lt; 0.01) and a relative risk of 1.75 or mortality during hospitalization for AKI patients. Furthermore, the duration of hospitalization was notably prolonged in the AKI group (p &amp;lt; 0.01), with a disparity of approximately three days. Individuals who developed AKI exhibited lower scores on the Barthel-dependence scale, indicative of higher dependence (p &amp;lt; 0.01), and were significantly older (p &amp;lt; 0.01) comparing with the ones that did not develop acute kidney injury. Additionally, it was remarkable that the leukocyte count at admission was more elevated in the AKI group (p = 0.03) compared to non-AKI patients with a difference of approximately 1.62×109/L. Conclusion Respiratory infections, including COVID-19, frequently lead to emergency department admissions and hospitalizations. This study validates an elevated prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) both at admission and during the hospital stay in such cases. The presence of AKI is linked to adverse outcomes, including mortality and extended hospital stays, underscoring the critical importance of promptly diagnosing AKI. Larger-scale studies are warranted in this field to enhance our understanding of this entity and therefore improve the outcomes related to this prevalent condition.

Lung Ultrasound to Evaluate Fluid Status and Optimize Early Volume-Expansion Therapy in Children with Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia Coli–Haemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Background: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli–haemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) can result in kidney and neurological complications. Early volume-expansion therapy has been shown to improve outcomes, but caution is required to avoid fluid overload. Lung ultrasound scanning (LUS) can be used to detect fluid overload and may be useful in monitoring hydration therapy. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study involved children with STEC-HUS who were recruited from a regional paediatric nephrology centre. B-line quantification by LUS was used to assess fluid status at the emergency department (ED) admission and correlated with the decrease in patient weight from the target weight. A control group of children on chronic dialysis therapy with episodes of symptomatic fluid overload was also enrolled in order to establish a B-line threshold indicative of severe lung congestion. Another cohort of “healthy” children, without renal or lung-related diseases, and without clinical signs of fluid overload was also enrolled in order to establish a B-line threshold indicative of euvolemia. Results: LUS assessment was performed in 10 children with STEC-HUS at ED admission, showing an average of three B-lines (range 0–10). LUS was also performed in 53 euvolemic children admitted to the ED not showing kidney and lung disease (healthy controls), showing a median value of two B-lines (range 0–7), not significantly different from children with STEC-HUS at admission (p = 0.92). Children with STEC-HUS with neurological involvement during the acute phase and those requiring dialysis presented a significantly lower number of B-lines at admission compared to patients with a good clinical course (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with long-term renal impairment also presented a lower number of B-lines at disease onset (p = 0.03). Conclusions: LUS is a useful technique for monitoring intravenous hydration therapy in paediatric patients with STEC-HUS. A low number of B-lines at ED admission (&lt;5 B-lines) was associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of an LUS-guided strategy for reducing complications in children with STEC-HUS.

Sex differences in Wake-Up Stroke patients characteristics and outcomes.

Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered. We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS. We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males. Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.

Evaluating the accuracy of a state-of-the-art large language model for prediction of admissions from the emergency room.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) can play a critical role in emergency room operations by augmenting decision-making about patient admission. However, there are no studies for LLMs using real-world data and scenarios, in comparison to and being informed by traditional supervised machine learning (ML) models. We evaluated the performance of GPT-4 for predicting patient admissions from emergency department (ED) visits. We compared performance to traditional ML models both naively and when informed by few-shot examples and/or numerical probabilities. We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health records across 7 NYC hospitals. We trained Bio-Clinical-BERT and XGBoost (XGB) models on unstructured and structured data, respectively, and created an ensemble model reflecting ML performance. We then assessed GPT-4 capabilities in many scenarios: through Zero-shot, Few-shot with and without retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and with and without ML numerical probabilities. The Ensemble ML model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88, an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.72 and an accuracy of 82.9%. The naïve GPT-4's performance (0.79 AUC, 0.48 AUPRC, and 77.5% accuracy) showed substantial improvement when given limited, relevant data to learn from (ie, RAG) and underlying ML probabilities (0.87 AUC, 0.71 AUPRC, and 83.1% accuracy). Interestingly, RAG alone boosted performance to near peak levels (0.82 AUC, 0.56 AUPRC, and 81.3% accuracy). The naïve LLM had limited performance but showed significant improvement in predicting ED admissions when supplemented with real-world examples to learn from, particularly through RAG, and/or numerical probabilities from traditional ML models. Its peak performance, although slightly lower than the pure ML model, is noteworthy given its potential for providing reasoning behind predictions. Further refinement of LLMs with real-world data is necessary for successful integration as decision-support tools in care settings.

Comparing Outcomes Between Direct and ED Admissions for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia.

Pediatric direct admissions (DA) have multiple benefits including reduced emergency department (ED) volumes, greater patient and provider satisfaction, and decreased costs without compromising patient safety. We sought to compare resource utilization and outcomes between patients with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia directly admitted with those admitted from the ED. Single-center, retrospective study at a large, academic, free-standing children's hospital (2017-2021). Patients were between 24 hours and 14 days old with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks, admitted with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), time to clinical care, resource utilization, NICU transfer, and 7-day readmission for phototherapy. A total of 1098 patients were included, with 276 (25.1%) ED admissions and 822 (74.9%) DAs. DAs experienced a shorter median time to bilirubin level collection (1.9 vs 2.1 hours, P = .003), received less intravenous fluids (8.9% vs 51.4%, P < .001), had less bilirubin levels collected (median of 3.0 vs 4.0, P < .001), received phototherapy sooner (median of 0.8 vs 4.2 hours, P < .001), and had a shorter LOS (median of 21 vs 23 hours, P = .002). One patient who was directly admitted required transfer to the NICU. No differences were observed in the 7-day readmission rates for phototherapy. Directly admitting patients for the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a preferred alternative to ED admission as our study demonstrated that DAs had a shorter time to clinical care, shorter LOS, and less unnecessary resource utilization with no difference in 7-day readmissions for phototherapy.

Unchanged Faces of Acute Appendicitis: Exploring Presentation and Treatment Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the implementation of novel guidelines for managing appendicitis, prompting an evaluation of its effects on patient presentation and treatment at a district general hospital. Healthcare facilities worldwide have adapted protocols to meet the unique challenges of the pandemic, ensuring safe and efficient care. Our study assesses the pandemic's influence on patient demographics, clinical outcomes, surgical procedures, and adherence to guidelines among individuals undergoing emergency appendicitis surgery. Through this investigation, we aimed to determine whether significant deviations occurred in managing acute appendicitis amidst the pandemic. Methodology Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in two cohorts for this retrospective analysis, comparing cases treated during the COVID-19 pandemic period (April to September 2020) with those treated one year prior. All patients underwent standardized assessments upon emergency department admission, including imaging studies and COVID-19 testing. Demographics, laboratory results, surgical details, and outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-pandemic groups, focusing on their overall management. Results The research involved a total of 172 individuals. During the pandemic (April to September 2020), 91 of these participants underwent surgery, which is more than the 81 individuals who had surgery during the same period the previous year (April to September 2019). Preoperative C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the pandemic group (P = 0.0455). The time from admission to surgery was shorter in the pandemic group (7.5 ± 4.6 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9; P = 0.0155). The overall operative and laparoscopic operative times were longer in the pandemic group (65 vs. 71 minutes, P = 0.391, and 55 vs. 62 minutes, P = 0.1424, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The number of patients presenting with complicated appendicitis was significantly higher in the pandemic group than in the nonpandemic group (44.4% vs. 61.4%; P= 0.034). The length of stay was shorter in the pandemic group (P = 0.53). Conclusions Our study suggests that surgery for acute appendicitis remains safe and feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic, with comparable outcomes. However, we noted an increase in the number of patients presenting with complicated appendicitis, possibly influenced by national pandemic guidelines in the United Kingdom. Despite this trend, our findings affirm the continued effectiveness of surgical management for acute appendicitis during the pandemic, highlighting the adaptability of healthcare systems in addressing emergent medical needs under challenging circumstances.

Patient Outcomes Compared Between Admissions Coordinated by the Transfer Center and Emergency Department at a U.S. Tertiary Care Hospital.

Patient admissions at a U.S. tertiary care hospital occur via the emergency department (ED), or transfer center. We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of patients admitted from the ED to admissions coordinated by the transfer center. Admissions to Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, between July 2019 to June 2021 were identified in this retrospective study and categorized into two cohorts-transfer center and ED. The two cohorts were then matched for age, sex, admitting service, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmissions between the two cohorts. 73,685 admissions were identified, of which 24,262 (33%) were transfer center admissions. In the matched cohorts (n = 19,093, each), in-hospital mortality (2.4% versus 1.9%), 30-day mortality (5.4% versus 3.9%), 30-day readmission (12.7% versus 7.2%), and LOS (6.4 days versus 5.1 days) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) among the admissions coordinated by transfer center. A higher palliative care consultation rate (9.4% versus 6.2%, P < 0.001), and a lower proportion of home discharges home (76.2% versus 82.5%, P < 0.001) among transfer center admissions was observed. Similar findings were noted in multivariate analysis, even when adjusting for LOS. Transfer center admissions had higher in-hospital mortality, LOS, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission compared to ED admissions. This study also highlights new considerations for palliative care consultation before transfer acceptance, especially to avoid futile transfers. Additional studies analyzing factors behind the outcomes of transfer center admissions are required.

HYPERTENSIVE EMERGENCIES AND URGENCIES: ADHERENCE TO GUIDELINES AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT AND IN–HOSPITAL MORTALITY

Abstract Introduction Data regarding prevalence and clinical management of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies are lacking and heterogeneous. Our goal is to characterize patients with hypertensive emergencies and urgencies admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of Niguarda hospital and Pio XI Hospital of Desio. In this population we also want to evaluate factors associated with organ damage, adherence to guidelines and the impact of Blood Pressure (BP) management on in–hospital mortality. Method We performed a multi–centre retrospective study collecting data about all adult patients with systolic BP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg admitted to our hospitals‘ ED during 2017 and 2019. Results Admission to ED for BP elevation were 1838 (0.95% of total admission to ED), of whom 38% were hypertensive emergencies and 62% were hypertensive urgencies. Patients with hypertensive emergencies were older, mainly male, with more comorbidities and more symptomatic at ED admission. In the emergencies group, we observe a SBP mean reduction of 39.50 mmHg (±26.35) and a DBP mean lowering of 16.28 mmHg (±17.57); the most used drugs were furosemide, nitroglycerin and parenteral labetalol. In the urgencies group, the mean reduction was 39.09 mmHg (±22.46) for SBP and 15.34 mmHg (±16.07) for DBP. The most used drug was short–acting nifedipine benzodiazepine and amlodipine in this group. Age, sex, clinical history of heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, symptoms at ED admission ad eGFR have been recognised as factors associated with organ damage. Instead, BP at ED admission and its management didn’t appear to have a significant impact on outcomes. Conclusions Our study demonstrated better adherence to guidelines in the treatment of hypertensive emergency than of hypertensive urgencies. Furthermore, no significant association were found between the BP management in the ED and in–hospital mortality.

Viral respiratory infections and air pollution: A review focused on research in Poland

The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced an interest in the relationship between air pollution and respiratory viral infections, indicating that their burden can be increased under poor air quality. This paper reviews the pathways through which air pollutants can enhance susceptibility to such infections and aggravate their clinical course and outcome. It also summarizes the research exploring the links between various viral infections and exposure to solid and gaseous pollution in Poland, a region characterized by poor air quality, especially during a heating season. The majority of studies focused on concentrations of particulate matter (PM; 86.7%); the other pollutants, i.e., BaP, benzene, CO, NOx, O3, and SO2, were studied less often and sometimes only in the context of a particular infection type. Most research concerned COVID-19, showing that elevated levels of PM and NO2 correlated with higher morbidity and mortality, while increased PM2.5 and benzo[a]pyrene levels were related to worse clinical course and outcome in hospitalized, regardless of age and dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. PM10 and PM2.5 levels were also associated with the incidence of influenza-like illness and, along with NO2 concentrations, with a higher rate of children's hospitalizations due to lower respiratory tract RSV infections. Higher levels of air pollutants also increased hospitalization due to bronchitis (PM, NOx, and O3) and emergency department admission due to viral croup (PM10, PM2.5, NOx, CO, and benzene). Although the conducted studies imply only correlations and have other limitations, as discussed in the present paper, it appears that improving air quality through reducing combustion processes in energy production in Poland should be perceived as a part of multilayered protection measures against respiratory viral infections, decreasing the healthcare costs of COVID-19, lower tract RSV infections, influenza, and other respiratory viral diseases prevalent between autumn and early spring, in addition to other health and climate benefits.

Efficacy of a Novel Prophylactic Scheme of Fosfomycin Trometamol in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Findings from a Prospective Monocentric Single-Arm Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel prophylactic scheme of fosfomycin trometamol in patients undergoing elective HoLEP (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate) or TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate) procedures for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia and undergoing elective HoLEP or TURP procedures during the period February 2022-June 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Two 3 g oral fosfomycin trometamol doses 12 h apart were administered at 8.00 p.m. on day -1 (i.e., the day before HoLEP or TURP procedure) and at 8.00 a.m. on day 0 (i.e., the day of the surgical procedure). The following outcomes were assessed: prevalence of fever occurring in the first 48 h after surgical procedure; prevalence of urological complications occurring after the surgical procedure; prevalence of proven urinary tract infections (UTIs) and/or bloodstream infections (BSIs) at 14 days post-procedure; and prevalence of emergency department admission for UTI-related sepsis at 14 days post-procedure. Univariate analysis comparing patients with and without proven UTI, BSI, or emergency department admission at 14 days post-procedure was carried out. Overall, 96 patients (median age 70 years) undergoing HoLEP (82.3%) or TURP (17.7%) were prospectively included. Median (IQR) time of surgical procedure after the morning fosfomycin dose was 226.5 min (range 88.5-393.75 min). Fever in the post-surgical 48 h occurred in 3/96 patients (3.1%). Prevalence of proven UTI at 14 days was as low as 1.0% (1/96), whereas no patient had proven BSI or UTI-related sepsis requiring emergency department admission at 14 days. Our findings support the contention that a prophylactic scheme based on two doses of fosfomycin trometamol 12 h apart before surgical intervention may represent a valuable strategy for preventing infectious complications in urologic patients undergoing HoLEP or TURP. Larger definitive confirmatory studies are warranted.

Blood culture algorithm implementation in emergency department patients as a diagnostic stewardship intervention

Blood cultures (BCx) are important for selecting appropriate antibiotic treatment. Ordering BCx for conditions with a low probability of bacteremia has limited utility, thus improved guidance for ordering BCx is needed. Inpatient studies have implemented BCx algorithms, but no studies examine the intervention in an Emergency Department (ED) setting. We performed a quasi-experimental pre-/post-intervention study from 12/1/2020 to 10/31/2023 at a single academic adult ED and implemented a BCx algorithm. The primary outcome was the blood culture event rates (BCE per 100 ED admissions) pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates (30-day ED and hospital readmission and antibiotic days of therapy). Seven ED physicians/APP reviewed BCx for appropriateness, with monthly feedback provided to ED leadership and physicians. After BCx algorithm implementation, the BCE rate decreased from 12.17 BCE/100 ED admissions to 10.50 BCE/100 ED admissions. Of the 3,478 reviewed BCE, we adjudicated 2153 BCE (62%) as appropriate, 653 (19%) as inappropriate, and 672 (19%) as uncertain. Adverse safety events were not statistically different pre/post-intervention. Implementation of an ED BCx algorithm demonstrated a reduction in BCE, without increased adverse safety events. Future studies should compare outcomes of BCx algorithm implementation in a community hospital ED without intensive chart review.

Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of emergency department-acute kidney injury: A systematic review

BackgroundOver half of all community-acquired acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) initially presented to emergency department (ED), but emergency department acute kidney injury (ED-AKI) is poorly characterised, poorly understood with no systematic review, often under-recognized and under-managed. ObjectiveTo review the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of ED-AKI, and risk factors of post-ED-AKI mortality globally. MethodsWe included published prospective or retrospective observational studies, controlled trials, and systematic reviews reporting AKI in adult ED attendees within 24 h of ED admission. Iatrogenic causes of AKI from medical interventions were excluded. We used PubMed to identify articles from 1996 to August 14, 2021, and adopted the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies to assess risk of bias. We used a Forest plot to present pooled ED-AKI incidence rates and I2 statistics. Other parameters were summarized narratively. ResultsUsing 24 h from ED admission as the definition for ED-AKI we identified six articles from 2005 to 2018 in high-income settings and one article with a 48-h timeframe. The pooled incidence of ED-AKI was 20 per 1000 adult ED attendances. Risk factors for ED-AKI included increasing age, nursing home residence, previous hospital admission within 30 days, discharge diagnosis of diabetes, obstructive uropathy, sepsis, gastrointestinal medical conditions, high serum creatinine, bilirubin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, alanine aminotransferase, low serum sodium or albumin on admission, poor premorbid renal function, antibiotic use, active malignancy, lung disease, hyperlipidaemia, and infection. Crude, all-cause 24-h mortality rate was 4.56 % and the one-year mortality rate was 35.04 %. Increasing age and comorbidities including cardiovascular disease and malignancy were associated with higher mortality rates. ConclusionThe review reveals a paucity of relevant literature which calls for further research, increased vigilance, red flag identification, and standardized management protocols for ED-AKI.

The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) and emergency department observation and admission rates: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundEmergency Department (ED) Observation Units (OU) can provide safe, effective care for low risk patients with intracranial hemorrhages. We compared current ED OU use for patients with subdural hematomas (SDH) to the validated Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) to evaluate the potential impact of implementing this risk stratification tool. MethodsRetrospective cohort of patients ≥18 years old with SDH of any cause from 2014 to 2020 to evaluate for potential missed OU cases. Missed OU cases were defined as patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15 with hospital length of stays (LOS) <2 days, who did not meet the composite outcome and were not cared for in the OU or discharged from the ED. Composite outcome included in-hospital death or transition to hospice care, neurosurgical intervention, GCS decline, and worsening SDH size. Secondary outcomes were whether application of BIG would increase ED OU use or reduce CT use. Results264 patients met inclusion criteria over 5.3 year study timeframe. Mean age was 61 years (range 19–93) and 61.4% were male. SDH were traumatic in 76.9% and 60.2% of the cohort had additional injuries. The admission rate was 81.4% (n = 215). Fourteen (6.5%) missed OU cases were identified (2.6/year). Retrospective application of BIG resulted in 82.6% (n = 217) at BIG 3, 10.2% (n = 27) at BIG 2 and 7.6% (n = 20) at BIG 1. Application of BIG would not have decreased admission rates (82.6% BIG 3) and BIG 1 and 2 admissions were often for medical co-morbidities. The composite outcome was met in 50% of BIG 3, 22% of BIG 2, and no BIG 1 patients. ConclusionIn a level 1 trauma center with an established observation unit, current clinical care processes missed very few patients who could be discharged or placed in ED OU for SDH. Hospital admissions in BIG 1/2 were driven by co-morbidities and/or injuries, limiting applicability of BIG to this population.

Extremes of Emergency Department Boarding are Associated With Poorer Financial Performance Among Hospitals.

Boarding emergency department (ED) patients is associated with reductions in quality of care, patient safety and experience, and ED operational efficiency. However, ED boarding is ultimately reflective of inefficiencies in hospital capacity management. The ability of a hospital to accommodate variability in patient flow presumably affects its financial performance, but this relationship is not well studied. We investigated the relationship between ED boarding and hospital financial performance measures. Our objective was to see if there was an association between key financial measures of business performance and limitations in patient progression efficiency, as evidenced by ED boarding. Cross-sectional ED operational data were collected from the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance, a voluntarily self-reporting operational database that includes 54% of EDs in the United States. Freestanding EDs, pediatric EDs and EDs with missing boarding data were excluded. The key operational outcome variable was boarding time. We reviewed the financial information of these nonprofit institutions by accessing their Internal Revenue Service Form 990. We examined standard measures of financial performance, including return on equity, total margin, total asset turnover, and equity multiplier (EM). We studied these associations using quantile regressions of added ED volume, ED admission percentage, urban versus nonurban ED site location, trauma status, and percentage of the population receiving Medicare and Medicaid as covariates in the regression models. Operational data were available for 892 EDs from 31 states. Of those, 127 reported a Form 990 in the year corresponding to the ED boarding measures. Median boarding time across EDs was 148min (interquartile range [IQR]: 100-216). A significant relationship exists between boarding and the EM, along with a negative association with the hospital's total profit margin in the highest-performing hospitals (by profit margin percentage). After adjusting for the covariates in the regression model, we found that for every 10min above 90min of boarding, the mean EM for the top quartile increased from 245.8% to 249.5% (p <.001). In hospitals in the top 90th percentile of total margin, every 10min beyond the median ED boarding interval led to a decrease in total margin of 0.24%. Using the largest available national registry of ED operational data and concordant nonprofit financial reports, higher boarding among the highest-profitability hospitals (i.e., top 10%) is associated with a drag on profit margin, while hospitals with the highest boarding are associated with the highest leverage (i.e., indicated by the EM). These relationships suggest an association between a key ED indicator of hospital capacity management and overall institutional financial performance.

Uncontrolled hypertension and hypertensive urgency: One-year single-center emergency department experience.

The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant concern in public healthcare systems, including daily practices of emergency departments (ED). We aimed to characterize patients admitted to an ED for elevated blood pressure (BP) and to identify factors leading to hospitalization. This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted to an ED in a tertiary hospital in 2022 due to an acute BP rise without hypertensive emergencies. The studied group (n = 570) constituted 1.5% of all ED admissions in 2022. The median age was 67 years (Q1-Q3) (52-75), 68.9% were females. Systolic BP (200 mm Hg [180-212]) and diastolic BP (105 mm Hg [100-115]) at home were higher than during triage (173 mm Hg [160-190] and 95 mm Hg [84-103], respectively [P <0.0001]). Thirty-nine percent of the studied population had taken BP-lowering agents before ED admission (captopril in 91.8% of cases). In the ED, nitrendipine (54.2%), captopril (38.1%), furosemide (16.3%), urapidil (10.0%), and nitroglycerine (1.9%) were administered. Eventually, a median of 140/82 mm Hg BP was reached in the median time of 288 minutes (202-400). Hospitalization was necessary in 5.4% of patients. The need for furosemide or urapidil administration in the ED doubled the risk of hospitalization (OR, 2.0; P <0.01). Before ED admission, only 17.0% of patients received guidelines-recommended single-pill combination therapy, and 17.6% had already visited ED for uncontrolled hypertension (median of 388 days earlier). Elevated BP is a common reason for admission to the ED. Crucially, improvements in long-term hypertension treatment and education are needed to reduce the number of patients seeking ED care for elevated BP.