Embryo Transfer Protocol Research Articles

Comparison of ultra-long gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist versus standard downregulation in women with adenomyosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAdenomyosis can lead to infertility and failure of in vitro fertilization. Limited evidence suggests that the use of long-term treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists followed by frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) may be the preferred approach for women with adenomyosis.ObjectiveThe aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of an ultra-long GnRH agonist with standard downregulation in women with adenomyosis undergoing FET.Materials and methodsThis randomized controlled trial enrolled 72 women with adenomyosis diagnosed by sonographic criteria who underwent FET cycles at the Avicenna Infertility Center. These women were randomly assigned to two equal groups: one received GnRH agonist treatment for three months before the FET cycle and the other served as the standard downregulation group. Results were reported as chemical and clinical pregnancy rates.ResultsThe two groups were similar in age, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, number of previous pregnancies and miscarriages, presence of uterine myomas, and endometriosis. However, the total dose of estradiol used until embryo transfer was significantly higher in the ultra-long GnRH agonist group than in the standard group (96.14 mg vs. 80.52 mg, p-value = 0.004). Nevertheless, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between the two groups.ConclusionsUltra-long GnRH agonist downregulation did not improve the chemical and clinical pregnancy rate in the FET cycle in women with adenomyosis compared with standard GnRH agonist downregulation in the other words, ultra-long GnRH agonist downregulation is not superior to standard protocol. In women with adenomyosis (without history of endometriosis), downregulation of standard GnRH agonists prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer may be the preferred embryo transfer protocol to gain higher clinical/chemical pregnancy rate.Trial registrationClinical trial registry: IRCT20160717028967N9, available at: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/36103.

Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy and its outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer/frozen embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective study.

The relationship between clinical outcomes and various factors influencing pregnancy was analyzed to provide reference data for patients and clinicians when selecting embryo transfer protocols. This was a retrospective study of 1309 transfer cycles between June 1, 2018, and May 1, 2023, in the Reproductive Medicine Center. Univariate analysis was performed on various factors that may have affected pregnancy outcomes, and further regression analysis was performed on those factors found by univariate analysis to correlate positively with clinical pregnancy outcomes. Finally, the embryo transfer schemes were compared based on the analysis results. The results showed that the stage of embryonic development significantly affected pregnancy outcomes after transplantation (P < .01, 95% confidence interval: 2.554 [1.958-3.332]). There was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate between 1 high-quality blastocyst transfer and 2 cleavage-stage embryos or blastocyst transfer (64.22% vs 70.11%, P = .439); however, the rate of multiple pregnancies after 1 high-quality blastocyst transfer was close to the rate of natural conception. These data show that the transfer of single high-quality blastocysts can significantly reduce the multiple pregnancy rate while ensuring an ideal pregnancy rate, which can be used as a reference for planning the first transplantation in patients with good prognoses.

Different endometrial preparation protocols on first frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes after hysteroscopic polypectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

To evaluate the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) following hysteroscopic polypectomy. This was a retrospective clinical cohort study involving 464 patients who underwent their first FET after polyp resection between January 2021 and July 2023. The cohorts were categorized into three groups: the natural cycle (NC) group (n = 139), the ovarian induction (OI) group (n = 117), and the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group (n = 208). In the initial unadjusted analysis, both NC and OI cycles exhibited similar pregnancy rates but were associated with significantly higher implantation rate (56.5%, 57.1% vs 42.0%, P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (73.4%, 74.4% vs 57.2%, P = 0.001), and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR; 67.6%, 63.2% vs 51.0%, P = 0.005) compared to the HRT group. Additionally, the three groups demonstrated comparable abortion rate (7.8%, 14.9% vs 10.9%, P = 0.299). After adjusting for potential confounders in the multiple logistic regression model, the HRT protocol resulted in a 54% significantly lower OPR compared to the NC protocol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.77; P = 0.003). Meanwhile, the OPR difference between the OI protocol and the NC protocol remained insignificant (OI vs NC: aOR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.12; P = 0.112). The ovulatory-FET scheme (NC and OI) following hysteroscopic polyp resection displayed promising clinical outcomes compared with HRT-FET scheme. The regimen without exogenous estrogen administration should be prioritized for endometrial preparation protocol after polypectomy.

P-410 A modified artificial cycle-frozen embryo transfer(mAC-FET) protocol with evidence of corpus luteum(CL) formation as determined by serum relaxin-2 in early pregnancy :a prospective proof-of-concept study

Abstract Study question Can a mAC-FET protocol for endometrial preparation in ovulatory patients lead to formation of a CL as evidenced by serum relaxin-2 in the pregnant patients? Summary answer CL forms in the mAC-FET protocol as serum relaxin-2 in early pregnancy was comparable to that in spontaneous conception.Late luteal rise of relaxin-2 wasn’t demonstrated. What is known already Clinical evidence points to increased incidence of preeclampsia in pregnancies by AC-FET cycles compared to ovulatory FET cycles-natural cycle(NC) and mNC. The absence of CL and it’s secretory products like relaxin-2 is a contributing factor. FET protocols for endometrial preparation in ovulatory patients need to be optimised. NC/mNC-FET protocols need frequent monitoring. Also there is a temporal variability between LH/hCG and progesterone levels. We studied a mAC-FET protocol in ovulatory patients with a delayed start(day3-5 of the cycle),low dose transdermal 17β estradiol gel to see the formation of CL as elucidated by the presence of serum relaxin-2 in early pregnancy. Study design, size, duration A proof-of- concept prospective study was conducted at a tertiary centre (July2023-Dec2023). Serum relaxin-2(R&amp;D/Quantikine/ELISA) was determined in 4 groups of patients- Group-A. mAC-FET(n = 34) 1.On the day of start of progesterone 2.Post-ET day5-9 (along with serum progesterone) 3.In pregnancy(6-9 weeks of gestation) Group-B. AC-FET(n = 8) 1.On the day of start of progesterone 2.In pregnancy(6-9 weeks) Group-C. Spontaneous conception (n = 9) 1.In pregnancy(6-9 weeks) Group-D. Infertility patients ( n = 24) 1.Preovulatory. All patients were ≤40 years with a BMI ≤30kg/m2. Participants/materials, setting, methods In the AC-FET cohort-oral estradiol 6mg/day was started from day1/2 of the cycle. When endometrial thickness was&amp;gt;7mm,progesterone&amp;lt;1ng/ ml then intramuscular progesterone was started- 50mg/day-3 days,100mg on day4-the day of ET(Day-3 embryos) and continued every alternate day.Progesterone gel was added post-ET. In the mAC-FET cohort-17β transdermal estradiol gel(0.06%) 3mg/day was started from day3-5,rest of the protocol was similar. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate non-parametric tests.Pearson coefficient(r) was used to assess linear-relationship.Two-tailed P&amp;lt;.05 indicated statistical significance. Main results and the role of chance Mean age and BMI of the patients with mAC-FET was 33.3±4.7 years and 24.4±3.7 kg/ m2 which was comparable across all groups (P=.14,P=.52 respectively). Clinical pregnancy rate in the mAC-FET group was 52.94%(18/34). 3 patients had an early abortion. Baseline relaxin-2 levels, median[Interquartile range(IQR)] were comparable- AC-FET cohort-9.1pg/mL(8.6-16.8), mAC-FET cohort-11.5pg/mL(9.6-13.7) and the infertility cohort-10.9pg/mL(8.4-14.5) (P=0.74) The primary outcome was the comparable levels of serum relaxin-2, in early pregnancy in the mAC-FET group and spontaneous conception group - median (IQR) 449.8pg/mL(73.1-492.3) and 487.9pg/mL(419.1-497.8) respectively (P=.12) The relaxin-2 levels, in early pregnancy in the mAC-FET group were significantly higher than the AC-FET group median(IQR) 449.8pg/mL(73.1-492.3) and 7.9pg/mL(7.8-9.5) respectively (P=.0005). As secondary outcomes, we studied the late luteal rise of relaxin-2 in the mAC-FET group and the relationship of late luteal progesterone with relaxin-2 in early pregnancies in the mAC-FET cohort. A late luteal rise of relaxin-2 was not demonstrated in the mAC-FET cohort. The serum relaxin-2, on the day of start of progesterone and on day5-9 post ET- median(IQR) 11.5pg/mL(9.6-13.7) and 11.4pg/mL(9.0-18.5), respectively was comparable (P=.18). The relationship between serum relaxin-2 in early pregnancy and the progesterone levels on day5-9 post ET in the mAC-FET cohort was not significant r = -.059 (P=.07) Limitations, reasons for caution This was a small proof- of-concept single centre study. Due to the limited numbers and short duration of the study, we could not compare efficacy, cancellation rates and pregnancy outcomes of the mAC-FET protocol with other FET protocols. Wider implications of the findings The mAC-FET protocol studied for endometrial preparation was similar to the AC -FET protocol regarding monitoring,flexibility and consistent progesterone exposure with the added advantage of the presence of the CL.This may decrease the risk of maternal/neonatal complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm it’s efficacy and impact on pregnancy outcomes. Trial registration number Not Applicable

P-388 The science of frozen embryo transfer, is modified natural cycle better?

Abstract Study question Do live birth rate, obstetric outcomes and number of clinic visits differ between frozen embryo transfer in modified natural and artificial cycle? Summary answer Modified natural cycle yielded a higher live birth rate for the similar number of visits, less hypertension, but higher rate of gestational diabetes. What is known already A frozen embryo transfer in a modified natural cycle entails procedure timing such that it coincides with the woman’s ovulatory cycle. Conversely, a frozen embryo transfer in an artificial cycle involves controlled hormonal stimulation, with the subsequent scheduling of embryo transfer. Based on the current evidence, there is no difference in pregnancy rates between modified natural cycle and artificial cycle. Frozen embryo transfer during an artificial cycle allows for greater flexibility for the patient and physicians. However, it seems to be associated with higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Study design, size, duration 1206 frozen embryo transfer cycles between January 1st, 2022, and December 31st, 2022 were retrospectively studied. Patients older than 40, with recurrent implantation failure, and recurrent pregnancy loss were excluded. Patients were divided according to their age, BMI, AMH, and the type of embryo transfer protocol. Compared outcomes were endometrial thickness, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, number of clinic visits prior to transfer, obstetric complications, livebirth rate, and livebirth weight. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients in the modified natural cycle group were followed by ultrasound and when the endometrium reached a thickness ≥ 7mm, and a dominant follicle ≥ 15 mm, HCG trigger was given, and the embryo (blastocyst) transferred 7 days later. In the artificial cycle group, patients received estrogen supplementation either orally or by patches and when the endometrium reached a thickness ≥ 7 mm, embryo transfer was scheduled following intramuscular progesterone administration for 6 days. Main results and the role of chance Patients with modified natural cycle (n = 250) embryo transfers have better clinical pregnancy rate compared to the embryo transfers (n = 250) in artificial cycles (63,6% vs 55,2% p = 0,05), and significantly better live birth rate (57,2% vs 43,9% p = 0,003) despite similar biochemical pregnancy rate (64% vs 61% p = 0,48). The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in modified natural compared to artificial cycles (10,2 % vs 20,99%, p = 0,008). Similar results were found with the transfer of PGTA tested embryos. There was no difference in the endometrial thickness between the 2 groups. The number of visits was higher in the modified natural cycle group, but the difference was not clinically significant (1,57 days vs 1,2 days). When comparing the obstetric outcomes, patients with a modified natural cycle transfer had a lower risk of hypertension (6,6% vs 13,5 % p = 0,10), but a significantly higher risk of gestational diabetes (19% vs 8,3% p = 0,02). No difference was observed regarding the birth weight, percentage of preterm birth or mode of delivery. Regression analysis was performed to identify any cofounder that might have affected the clinical pregnancy rate, and the results showed that the type of transfer was the only factor affecting the outcomes (OR: 1,23 CI: 1,03- 1,46) Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. A randomized controlled study should be performed to confirm these findings. Wider implications of the findings Modified natural embryo transfer could be used to improve pregnancy outcomes. With proper scheduling, embryo transfer could be done with a similar number of visits for modified natural cycles and artificial cycles. More studies are needed to assess the increased risk of gestational diabetes with natural cycle embryo transfer. Trial registration number NCT06053827

Pregnancy losses in Bos indicus-influenced beef and dairy recipients assigned to a fixed-time embryo transfer protocol

Pregnancy losses from fixed-time embryo transfer (FTET) to calving were evaluated in Bos indicus-influenced beef and dairy recipients. Data from 4366 FTET events were collected from Nelore × Angus recipient heifers, and from 38538 FTET events in Gir × Holstein recipient heifers and cows. In beef recipients, pregnancy losses were greater (P < 0.01) from FTET (day 7 of the experiment) to day 32 compared with day 32–100 and with day 100 to calving (58.7, 39.5, and 36.7%, respectively), and did not differ (P = 0.56) between these latter periods. Recipients that lost the pregnancy from FTET to day 32 gained less (P < 0.01) body condition score after FTET compared with recipients that maintained the pregnancy. Pregnancy losses from day 32 to calving were greater (P < 0.01) in recipients reared in drylots and moved to pastures on day 32 compared with recipients reared on pasture. In dairy recipients, pregnancy losses from FTET (day 7) to day 32 were greater (P < 0.01) than losses from day 32 to calving (50.4 and 29.4%). Pregnancy losses throughout gestation were greater (P < 0.01) when the FTET event was performed during the warm season, and greater (P < 0.01) in recipients with < 3/8 Gir influence. Recipients with ≥ 3/8 Gir influence experienced a lesser (P ≤ 0.05) increase in pregnancy losses during the warm season compared with recipients with < 3/8 Gir influence. Collectively, this experiment provides novel information about pregnancy losses in B. indicus-influenced herds receiving FTET.

Evaluating the Impact of Long-Term GnRH Agonist Therapy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometriosis-Associated Implantation Failure and Pregnancy Loss

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of long-term gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy in preventing endometriosis progression and relieving symptoms, particularly on pregnancy outcomes during thawed embryo transfer in patients experiencing endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss. Methods In individuals with clinical endometriosis and a history of recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss, we conducted a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between those undergoing long-term GnRH agonist treatment for symptom relief, such as menstrual pain, followed by embryo transfer using Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) cycle, and those undergoing embryo transfer using an HRT cycle without GnRH agonist treatment. The study examined various clinical outcomes between the two groups. Results The primary outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), miscarriage rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, and perinatal complications. The GnRH agonist group showed significantly higher LBR than the control group (37.50% vs. 13.04%; p=0.02). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and gravidity, showed significantly higher LBR in the GnRH agonist group compared to the control group (odds ratio: 15.3; 95% confidence interval: 2.30, 102.00; p=0.005). Conclusions The findings of this study suggested that employing a GnRH agonist in the embryo transfer protocol is effective for patients with endometriosis experiencing recurrent implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss.

Clinical Outcomes in Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)-Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Protocol Increased by Administering Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH) in the Initial Stage of the Luteal Phase: A Retrospective Analysis.

The objective of this study was to determine if gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH) administration supporting the luteal phase in frozen embryo transfer (FET) improves clinical outcomes Methods and materials This is a retrospective cohort study and we analyzed 3515 cycles of FET at the Department of Reproductive Medicine in our hospital from February 2018 through December 2021. Patients were divided into the GnRH (triptorelin+progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)) group and the non-GnRHa (existing treatment without triptorelin) group. There were 1033 and 2485 cases in the above groups, respectively. Live birth rates (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) were contrasted in the two groups. We found greater CPR (58.00% versus 48.40%, P-value = 0.003) and LBR (52.70% versus 45.60%, P-value = 0.001) for HRT-FET cycles, and found no clinical significance for natural cycle FET (NC-FET) (58.20% versus 52.90%, P-value = 0.364 and 54.40% versus 47.00%, P-value=0.211), GnRH+HRT-FET (53.00% versus 53.00%, P-value=0.176 and 46.20% versus 47.30%, P-value=0.794), and stimulation-FET (59.30% versus 52.90%, P-value=.00.566 and 59.30% versus 47.10%, P-value=.00.247) in terms of CPR and LBR in the two groups. There was a 47% increase in CPR in the GnRH group, and there was a 33% increase in LBR in the same group. During HRT-FET cycles, administering triptorelin three to four times in the existing luteal support can improve CPR and LBR, and administering triptorelin during the initial stage of the luteal phase can prove a new option for luteal support.

Endometriosis diagnosed by ultrasound is associated with lower live birth rates in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment

ObjectiveTo study the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after the first In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) treatment in women with or without deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and/or endometrioma diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group definitions. DesignProspective observational cohort study at a university hospital. SubjectsIn total 1040 subfertile women aged 25- ≤39 years, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment between January 2019 and October 2022. Of these, 234 (22.5%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 20.0 – 25.0) women were diagnosed with DIE and/or endometrioma at systematic TVUS prior to starting their treatment. ExposureAll women underwent their first IVF or ICSI treatment. Fresh and/or frozen embryos from the first cycle were used until pregnancy was achieved or no embryos remained. Main Outcome MeasuresCLBR after the first IVF/ICSI cycle in women with or without DIE and/or endometrioma. ResultsThe CLBR after the first IVF/ICSI treatment in the total cohort of women was 426/1040, (41.0%; 95% CI, 38.0 – 44.0). Women with DIE and/or endometrioma had a lower CLBR (78/234, 33.3%; 95% CI, 27.3 – 39.4) compared to women without the disease (348/806, 43.2%; 95% CI, 39.8 – 46.6), p=0.007. The crude relative risk (RR) for cumulative live birth for women with DIE and/or endometrioma was 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94, and after adjustments were made for age, BMI, s-anti müllerian hormone, stimulation protocol and day for embryo transfer, the adjusted RR was 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.82. There was no difference in the number of retrieved mature oocytes, fertilization rate or good quality embryos between the two groups. ConclusionThe presence of DIE and/or endometrioma diagnosed by TVUS lowers the chance for a live birth in women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment.

#390 : Why Our Clinical Pregnancy Rates Have Improved Over the Past Two Years: Exploring Key Points of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles

Background and Aims: GnRH-ant protocol is effective in preventing a surge of pituitary luteinising hormone during controlled ovarian stimulation. In recent years, GnRH-ant protocol has been optimised to improve in vitro fertilisation outcomes. However, firstly, the success rate of frozen embryo transfer is consistently better than that of fresh embryo transfer and secondly, the success rate of GnRH-ant protocol on fresh embryo transfer is lower than that of the long protocol. This study aims to draw out a comparison of before and after data from our own centre to find the reasons for the gradual maturation of GnRH-ant protocol on fresh embryo transfer. Our study proposed to investigate the determinants affecting fresh embryo transfer in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols. Method: We reviewed 2464 fresh embryo transfer cycles for IVF/ICSI-ET assisted reproduction techniques performed at our centre from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. The exclusion criteria were as follows: endometriosis grade III to IV (American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis); adenomyosis; severe male oligospermia or obstructive azoospermia. Firstly, we compared the single-cycle clinical pregnancy rates between 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019. Next, we performed a multifactorial regression analysis to understand what changes our centre had made between the five years in terms of years. Finally, data from 2015 to 2019 were grouped as a whole and then subjected to understand exactly where the differences in clinical pregnancy rates were affecting the GnRH-ant protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Results: A total of 1,388 cycles were included from 2015 to 2017, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 51.42% (688/1388). 1,076 cycles were included from 2018 to 2019, with a clinical pregnancy rate of 57.43% (618/1076). 2018 to 2019 compared to 2015 to 2017 for first-time IVF/ICSI. There was a 6.01% increase in clinical pregnancy rate for women who had assisted conception and performed GnRH-ant protocol with fresh embryo transfer. The results of the univariate analysis conducted suggested that the factors influencing the classification of clinical pregnancy included female basal E2 base, LH base, FSH base, P base, female Gn initiation date E2 start, LH start, FSH start, P start, Gn initiation volume and number of Gn days, antagonist addition date E2 add, LH add, FSH add, P add, plate machine day E2 trigger, LH trigger, P trigger, plate machine day number of different follicles in the meridian follicles 10-14 mm, follicles 14-16 mm, follicles 16-18 mm, follicles 18mm or more. Multifactorial regression analysis after correction suggested that age, BMI, endometrial thickness on the day of transfer, number of embryos transferred and progesterone level on HCG Day were independent influencing factors for successful pregnancy with antagonist regimen and fresh embryo transfer. Conclusion: Age, BMI, endometrial thickness on the day of transfer, number of embryos transferred and progesterone levels on HCG Day were independent influences.

Impact of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone agonist and hormone replacement therapy on pregnancy outcomes in single euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfer for patients with endometrial polyps

Objective: While consensus on the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is lacking, this is particularly true for patients with infertility and a history of endometrial polyps (EPs). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with hormone replacement therapy (GnRHa-HRT) could improve pregnancy outcomes in single euploid FET for patients with a history of EPs. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 395 women who underwent their first single euploid FET cycle were divided into groups according to endometrial preparation protocols as follows: natural cycle (NC) (n=220), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (n=122), and GnRHa-HRT groups (n=53). Subsequently, the FET cycles in the three groups were subdivided according to maternal age. All patients underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy before FET, and their EPs were confirmed by pathology. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in live birth rates among the three groups (58.64% vs. 58.20% vs. 56.60%, P=0.964). Furthermore, the rates of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, premature live birth, and pregnancy complications were comparable among the three groups (P &gt;0.05). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were reported between the groups (adjusted odds ratios [OR] and 95% credible intervals [CI] for live birth rate, HRT vs. NC: 1.119, 0.660–1.896, P=0.677; GnRHa-HRT vs. NC: 1.165, 0.610–2.226, P=0.643). Additionally, the pregnancy outcomes of the FET cycle were not influenced by the endometrial preparation protocols in the subgroups when stratified by maternal age (P &gt;0.05). Conclusion: GnRHa-HRT did not improve the pregnancy outcomes of the single euploid FET in patients with a history of EPs.

Large-scale retrospective analysis of methodological factors affecting pregnancy rates after embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization.

This study aimed to investigate the impact of methodological factors on pregnancy rates after embryo transfer (ET) for in vitro fertilization. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2020 and April 2022. A total of 2048 patients who underwent ultrasonography-guided first frozen embryo transfer (FET) or a fresh ET cycle due to infertility were included in the study. The effects of age, ET protocol (frozen or fresh), preimplantation genetic testing, number of embryos transferred (NET), and embryo fundus distance on pregnancy rate were investigated. The mean age of pregnant patients (31.51 ± 5.28) was significantly lower than that of non-pregnant patients (35.34 ± 6.39) (P < .001). Multiple regression analysis showed that women with lower age (P < .001), higher NET (P < .001), higher embryo fundus distance (P < .001), FET (P < .001), and preimplantation genetic testing (P = .012) had a significantly higher likelihood of pregnancy. Appropriate transfer depth, younger age, euploid embryo transfer, FET, and a higher NET can increase the likelihood of pregnancy. However, multiple factors must be considered when deciding the best protocol for a particular patient, including patient preference, costs and timing.

Retrospective analysis of the endometrial preparation protocols for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in women with endometriosis

BackgroundThere was inconsistency in optimal endometrial preparation protocol for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in patients with endometriosis. We conducted this study to investigate the effect of different endometrial preparation protocols on the pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis undergoing FET cycles, and determine the optimal number of GnRHa injections in GnRHa-HRT protocols.Method(s)This was a retrospective cohort analysis of women with endometriosis who underwent FET cycles at a single university-based center. This study retrospectively analyzed 2048 FET cycles in our center from 2011 to 2020. According to the endometrial preparation protocols, patients were divided into 4 groups: gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist-hormone replacement therapy(GnRHa-HRT), hormone replacement therapy(HRT), ovulation induction(OI), and natural cycle(NC). In the GnRHa-HRT group, patients were further divided into 3 groups: one injection of GnRHa, two injections of GnRHa, and three or more injections of GnRHa. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential non-similarities among the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to figure out the risk factors for pregnancy outcomes.Result(s)There were no statistical differences in pregnancy outcomes among the four endometrial preparation protocols in FET cycles with endometriosis patients, the results retained after propensity score matching(PSM). And in endometriosis patients complicated with adenomyosis, the results remained similar. In patients with GnRHa-HRT protocol, there were no differences in clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate with different numbers of GnRHa injections, the early miscarriage rate were 18% in the two injections of GnRHa group and 6.5% in the one injection of GnRHa group(P = 0.017). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that two injections of GnRHa before FET was associated with increased early miscarriage rate compared with one injection of GnRHa[adjusted OR (95% CI): 3.116(1.079–8.998),p = 0.036].Conclusion(s)The four kinds of endometrial preparation protocols for FET, GnRHa-HRT, HRT, OI and NC had similar pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis. In endometriosis patients complicated with adenomyosis, the results remained similar. In patients with endometriosis undergoing GnRHa-HRT protocol for FET, more injections of GnRHa had no more advantages in pregnancy outcomes, on the contrary, it might increase the early miscarriage rate.

P-500 Relationship of midluteal serum progesterone levels and pregnancy outcomes after day-3 embryo-transfer(ET) in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles with intramuscular progesterone: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Study question Does midluteal(day-9 of progesterone) serum progesterone level in HRT cycles with intramuscular progesterone affect the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR)/early miscarriage rate(MR) and live birth rate(LBR)? Summary answer Midluteal serum progesterone between 32.2-43.7ng/ml results in significantly greater CPR versus that with lower/higher levels and significantly greater LBR compared to that with lower levels. What is known already Evidence points to low serum progesterone levels at the time of FET being associated with lower ongoing pregnancy rates. Recently, the relation of midluteal serum progesterone levels in HRT cycles with vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support (LPS) has been elaborated indicating better pregnancy outcomes with an optimum range of serum progesterone/higher levels. There is no data establishing the association of pregnancy outcomes with midluteal serum progesterone levels when intramuscular progesterone is used as LPS in HRT cycles. Study design, size, duration A prospective cohort study conducted between December 2019-March 2022 at a tertiary centre with 196 patients(204 cycles), both-autologus(AO)-56.3% and donor oocytes(DO)- 43.6%: fresh ET-16.6% and frozen ET(FET)-83.3% with similar ICSI, vitrification and ET protocols(2/3 Grade A day-3 embryos). CPR, early MR (≤13 weeks miscarriage/clinical pregnancy) and LBR (≥28 weeks, LBs/ETs) were compared. Serum progesterone was measured on the morning of day-5 post-ET(day 9th from the start of progesterone). Most patients delivered at the same institute. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients were non-smokers with normal hysteroscopy. Oral estradiol 6-8mg was initiated from Day 1-2 (for 10-17 days). When ET ≥ 7mm and serum progesterone &amp;lt;1ng/ml, intramuscular progesterone 100mg/day was started (daily till day-4 post-ET, then every 3rd day till week 8). Vaginal progesterone gel was added from day 5 post-ET till week 10. Serum progesterone levels were categorized in tertiles. Chi-square, t-tests and multiple regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Two-tailed P&amp;lt;.05 indicated statistical significance. Main results and the role of chance Mean age was 34.76±5.36 years with a mean BMI 26.4±4.38kg/m2 Overall, CPR was 106/204(51.9%), LBR 78/204(38.2%) and early MR 28/106(26.4%) Midluteal serum progesterone levels ranged from 11.1-261ng/ml and were divided into tertiles(T) T1&amp;lt;32.0ng/ml(n = 68),T2 32.2-43.7ng/ml(n = 68),T3 &amp;gt;43.7ng/ml (n = 68) Median progesterone levels of T1,T2,T3 were 27.7ng/ml(Interquartile range [IQR] 7.0), 38.4ng/ml (IQR 5.0) and 51.2ng/ml (IQR 12.6) respectively. Mean age and mean BMI was not significantly different across the tertiles P=.27, P=.20 respectively CPR was significantly different across T1 32/68(47%),T2 45/68(66.1%)and T3 29/68(42.6%) P=.014. CPR was significantly more in T2 versus T1 and T3, (OR:2.2, 95%CI:1.1-4.4 P =.02) and (OR:2.6,95%CI:1.3-5.3, P=.006), respectively. T3 versus T1, P =.60 LBR was also significantly different across the tertiles [T1 20/68(29.4%), T2 34/68(50%),T3 24/68(35.3%) P=.03] LBR in T2 was significantly more than in T1(OR: 2.4,95% CI:1.2-4.9, P=.02). There was no significant difference betweenT3 versus T1 and T2 versus T3, P=.46, P=.08, respectively. Early MR wasn’t significantly different across T1 12/32(37.5%), T2 11/45(24.4%) and T3 5/29(17.2%), P=.18 Serum progesterone levels were not significantly affected by age r = 0.0257, P=.71 or BMI r = 0.0097, P=.89 Multivariate logistic regression showed that age affected CPR after adjusting for BMI, midluteal serum progesterone levels, origin of oocytes, fresh ET/FET(AOR 0.92: 95% CI:0.86-0.98, P=.01). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a single centre study with limited sample size. Including the measurement of serum progesterone at the time of ET would have given a better perspective of the patient specific behavior of progesterone as LPS. Larger studies with different LPS protocols are needed to validate the results. Wider implications of the findings In HRT cycles with intramuscular progesterone, an optimum midluteal serum progesterone level is related to better pregnancy outcomes. Factors causing the wide variation of progesterone levels need to be evaluated so as to individualize the dose. Identifying the appropriate time frame for optimising the midluteal progesterone levels should be explored. Trial registration number not applicable

Effects of two different types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following antagonist fresh embryo transfer: a retrospective study

BackgroundOnly a small number of studies have reported the use of progesterone vaginal gel in combination with dydrogesterone as part of the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two types of luteal support on pregnancy outcomes following the antagonist protocol for fresh embryo transfer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from infertile patients who underwent fresh embryo transfer via the antagonist protocol (2785 cycles) between February and July 2019 and between February and July 2021 at the Peking University Third Hospital Reproductive Medicine Centre. According to the luteal support received, the cycle groups were divided into the progesterone vaginal gel group (single medication or VP group; 1170 cycles) and the progesterone vaginal gel plus dydrogesterone group (combination medication or DYD + VP group; 1615 cycles). After propensity score matching, the clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn total, 1057 pairs of cycles were successfully matched via propensity scores. The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates in the combination medication group were significantly higher than those in the single medication group (P < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were noted in the early miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups (both P > 0.05).ConclusionsCombined luteal support after the antagonist protocol is preferred for patients undergoing fresh cycle embryo transfer.

A pilot study of the intrauterine non-ablative erbium laser effectiveness in the endometrium preparation for cryopreserved embryo transfer in women with a history of implantation failures

Background. Embryo implantation failure remains an urgent issue of assisted reproductive technologies (ART).&#x0D; Aim. To determine the effect of intrauterine irradiation with a non-ablative erbium laser on the endometrium state using the histological and immunohistochemical examination and to evaluate its effectiveness in ART cryo-protocols.&#x0D; Materials and methods. The study enrolled 25 women aged 2645 with 1 to 5 failed implantations who were planning a pregnancy in a cryopreserved embryo transfer protocol. On days 610 of the menstrual cycle, all patients underwent a single procedure of intrauterine irradiation of the endometrium and cervical canal mucosa with an erbium laser in a non-ablative mode using Fotona SP Dynamis laser system (Slovenia). The histological and immunohistochemical data of the endometrium before and 12 months after the procedure and the pregnancy rate with subsequent transfer of the cryopreserved embryo were assessed.&#x0D; Results. Intrauterine irradiation with a non-ablative erbium laser increased the proliferative activity of the endometrium (p=0.029), the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (p=0.029), reduced the sclerosis lesions in the spiral arteries and endometrial stroma, increased the expression of progesterone and estrogen receptors, thus significantly increasing the effectiveness of the ART cryo-protocols (p=0.013).

B-cell lymphoma 6 expression significantly differs by the uterine preparation method used for frozen embryo transfer

To determine whether B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6), an endometriosis-associated marker postulated to predict poor pregnancy outcomes, is differentially expressed in the window of implantation with various uterine preparation regimens commonly used for frozen embryo transfers. A retrospective cohort study. An academic center. Patients with infertility who underwent endometrial biopsy for BCL6 evaluation INTERVENTION(S): Exogenous estradiol and/or progesterone. Endometrial BCL6 histological score (HSCORE) and overexpression (HSCORE >1.4) RESULT(S): Two hundred and forty-four patients were included in the analysis: 76 patients were sampled in a natural menstrual cycle without exogenous hormone exposure (NC), 25 under a modified natural cycle embryo transfer protocol with choriogonadotropin alfa injection followed by luteal phase vaginal progesterone supplementation (mNC), and 143 under a programmed cycle embryo transfer protocol, with estradiol administration followed by addition of intramuscular progesterone-in-oil injections (PC). Median HSCORE (interquartile range) was the highest in NC (3.0 [1.8-3.6]). BCL6 expression was significantly lower in mNC (1.1 [0.4-2.1]) and PC groups (0.8 [0.3-1.3]) compared with NC. In addition, BCL6 overexpression (HSCORE >1.4) was observed in 80.3% of NC, 40.0 % of mNC, and 23.1 % of PC. After adjusting for covariates, the endometrium exposed to exogenous progesterone had significantly lower odds of BCL6 overexpression than that of a natural menstrual cycle (adjusted odds ratio, 0.12 [95% CI 0.04-0.35] for mNC; and odds ratio, 0.08 [95% CI 0.04-0.17] for PC). BCL6 expression differs by the type of uterine preparation method, with lower levels observed with exogenous progesterone exposure. The validity and utility of BCL6 testing under medicated endometrial state warrants further investigation.

Impact of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis on Pregnancy Outcomes In Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To analyze the influence of endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) on embryo transfer (ET) results in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and BioMed Central databases were searched from inception up to December 2022 for studies comparing pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing personalized embryo transfer (pET) by ERA versus standard ET. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random effects model. We identified twelve studies, including 14,224 patients. No differences were observed between patients undergoing ERA test and those not undergoing ERA test prior to ET in terms of live birth (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63-1.58, I2 = 92.7%), clinical pregnancy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.61, I2 = 86.5%), biochemical pregnancy (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.49, I2 = 87%), positive pregnancy test (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.22, I2 = 0%), miscarriage (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, I2 = 67.1%), and implantation rate (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.44-3.14, I2 = 93.2%). pET with ERA is not associated with any significant differences in pregnancy outcomes as compared to standard ET protocols. Therefore, the utility of ERA in patients undergoing IVF should be revisited.

Evaluation of Early Frozen Blastocyst Transfer in A True Natural Cycle Protocol in Comparison to A Hormone Replacement Protocol: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Timing of frozen embryo transfer (FET) within a purported window of implantation is of increasing interest, and there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the transfer of frozen embryos early within these frozen embryo transfer protocols. This study aimed to evaluate whether live birth rates were equivalent after FET of blastocysts 4 days after luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in a true natural cycle protocol, compared to a hormone replacement (HR) protocol. Single-centre, retrospective cohort study involving patients undergoing autologous frozen blastocyst transfer from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2016. Cycles were grouped according to their protocol: true natural cycle (hormonal detection of LH surge with FET scheduled four days later) versus HR cycle (luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression, oral or vaginal estradiol and intramuscular progesterone starting five days before FET). A total of 850 cycles were included, 501 true natural cycles and 349 HR cycles. The primary outcome was the live birth rate, secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage. Logbinomial regression models were performed adjusting for a priori selected variables. Adjusted resulted in live birth rates of 38.7 and 40.4%, [adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.22, P=0.729] in the natural cycle and HR groups, respectively. The secondary outcome analyses did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference in the rate of positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), clinical intrauterine pregnancy rate, or miscarriage rate. The timing of the FET four days after LH surge in a true natural cycle protocol results in equivalent live birth rates compared to a HR protocol. Results of this study suggest that the window of implantation within the natural cycle may be less finite than currently believed and further prospective studies evaluating the timing of frozen embryo transfer are warranted.

Comparison of Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Between Fresh Embryo Transfer and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer.

This study compared the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). These patients were split into two groups: the fresh embryo transfer group and the FET group. The general conditions, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes between these groups were compared. The influencing factors of fetal macrosomia occurrence were explored as well. Compared with the fresh embryo transfer group, the FET group had a significantly higher mean age (32.59 ± 4.77 vs. 31.90 ± 4.71, p < 0.05) and lower multiple pregnancy rate (21.2% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of congenital anomalies of neonates between the two groups (1.32% vs. 0.37%, p > 0.05). In the FET group, compared with the fresh embryo transfer group, the mean birth weight of singleton live births, the cesarean section rate, and the incidence of fetal macrosomia were significantly increased, while the incidence of low birth weight was significantly decreased. The logistic analysis showed that the occurrence of fetal macrosomia was primarily associated with the embryo transfer protocol (odds ratio [OR] = 2.769, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.246-6.154, p < 0.05), endometrial thickness (OR = 1.144, 95% CI: 1.043-1.256, p < 0.05), and gestational age (OR = 1.710, 95% CI: 1.338-2.184, p < 0.05). Macrosomia (OR = 2.938, 95% CI: 1.436-6.010, p = 0.003) and multiple pregnancy (OR = 3.574, 95% CI: 2.616-4.882, p < 0.001) significantly increased the cesarean section rate. The risk of fetal macrosomia and congenital anomalies in the offspring of the fresh embryo transfer group was lower than that in the offspring of the FET group, we preferred to fresh embryo transfer for patients with assisted reproductive technologies. FET should be used as supplementary therapeutic strategy with strengthened pregnancy management and screening to reduce the occurrence of birth defects in newborns.