Embolization For Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Research Articles

Computed Tomography Angiography and Conventional Angiography for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and conventional angiography (CA) and the therapeutic value of transarterial embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with malignancy. A retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent CTA and/or CA for gastrointestinal bleeding at a comprehensive cancer center between the years 2011-2021 was performed. Clinical and patient outcome data were collected and analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests (whichever is appropriate) for categorical variables in univariate analysis. All tests were two-sided at a significance level of 0.05.Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Fifty-two percent of our patients underwent CTA alone, 29% underwent CA alone, and 19% underwent both procedures. Overall, CTA was positive in 11.3% (8/71) of patients and CA was positive in 22.9% (11/38) of patients. Of patients who underwent both studies, 52.6% (10/19) were positive for both. ICU admission was associated with CTA and/or CA positivity (p=0.015). Of 48 patients with data for embolization, 50% of patients underwent transarterial embolization for bleeding, 11 patients had identifiable bleeding on CA, and 13 patients underwent prophylactic embolization at the site of suspected bleeding.Rebleeding following embolization was found in 33.3% (8/24) of patients, including six patients who underwent prophylactic embolization and two patients who were treated for visualized bleeding. CTA and CA are two critical studies for patients with GI bleeding and a history of malignancy. Neither alone can effectively exclude an identifiable source of bleeding. In patients with a history of malignancy, transarterial embolization may be an effective treatment of both angiographically visible and occult sources of GI bleeding.

Embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical success and complication rates following interventional embolization for treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) at a tertiary care centre. The secondary purpose was to evaluate results of practice change whereby multiphase CT angiography was requested prior to conventional angiograms.
 Methods: A retrospective chart review and analysis of 38 patients undergoing Interventional Radiology guided embolization for acute GIB was performed. Clinical success was defined as patient stability 30 days’ post embolization and complications included subsequent bleeding requiring endoscopy, surgery or additional embolization, or death.
 Results: Overall clinical success rate was 86.8% (33/38). Complications included 14 patients (36.8%) experiencing continued bleeding, 6 patients (15.8%) requiring repeat endoscopic evaluation, 8 patients (21.1%) requiring surgery, 3 patients (7.9%) requiring repeat embolization, and 4 deaths (10.5%). These results were not inferior to clinical success rates reported in the literature for GIB regardless of location. Positive predictive value for multiphase CT angiogram was 92.3% and the negative predictive value was 57.1%.
 Conclusions: Interventional angiography and embolization is an effective treatment for GIB with the most common complication being recurrent bleeding which may require additional endoscopic evaluation, surgical intervention or additional embolization. Clinical success and complication rates at this centre are similar to those reported in the literature. Continued evaluation of the utility of multiphase CT angiography prior to conducting embolization should be considered to determine its impact on rates of negative angiogram studies.

3:54 PM Abstract No. 370 Selective transcatheter arterial embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: single-center comparison of 30-day outcomes of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue versus coil embolization

3:54 PM Abstract No. 370 Selective transcatheter arterial embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: single-center comparison of 30-day outcomes of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue versus coil embolization

Clinical Outcomes of Angiography and Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Analyses according to Bleeding Sites and Embolization Types

The clinical outcomes of angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) have not been completely assessed, especially according to bleeding sites. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of angiography and safety of TAE in acute GIB. This was a retrospective study evaluating the records of 321 patients with acute GIB who underwent angiography with or without TAE. Targeted TAE was conducted in 134 patients, in whom angiography showed bleeding sources. Prophylactic TAE was performed in 29 patients when the bleeding source was not detected but a specific vessel was strongly suspected by other examinations. The rate of technical success, clinical success, and complications were analyzed. The detection rate of bleeding source via angiography was 50.8% (163/321), which was not different according to the bleeding sites. The detection rate was higher if the probable bleeding source had already been found by another investigation (59.7% vs. 35.8%, p<0.001). TAE sites were upper GIB in 67, mid GIB in 74, and lower GIB in 22. The technical success rate was 99.3% (133/134), and the clinical success rate was 63.0% (104/163). The prophylactic embolization group showed lower clinical success rate than the targeted embolization group (44.8% vs. 67.9%, p=0.06). The TAE-related complication rate was 12.9% (21/163). Ischemia and/or infarction was more common after TAE for mid and lower GIB than for upper GIB (15.6% vs. 3.0%, p=0.007). Angiography with or without TAE was an effective method for acute GIB. Targeted embolization should be performed if possible given that it has a higher clinical success rate.

Do outcomes of arterial embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding depend on the choice of embolic agent?

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Dijon School of Medicine, Bocage Teaching Hospital, Dijon Cedex, France Correspondence to Romaric Loffroy, MD, PhD, Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Dijon School of Medicine, Bocage Teaching Hospital, 2 Bd Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, BP 77908, 21079 Dijon Cedex, France Tel: +33 380 293 677; fax: +33 380 295 455; e-mail: [email protected] Received September 29, 2011 Accepted November 8, 2011

Selective microcoil embolization of arterial gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute situation

To evaluate microcoil embolization in the interventional treatment of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Forty-four patients (29 men, 15 women) with active arterial gastrointestinal bleeding were treated with microcoil embolization. The analysis included technical/clinical success, morbidity, mortality, and intervention-related mortality. Age, sex, underlying malignant disease, number of embolizations, preinterventional and postinterventional hemoglobin levels, blood products administered peri-interventionally, amount of embolization material used, duration of fluoroscopy, and use of contrast medium were evaluated for possible effects on technical and clinical success. The primary technical success rate of microcoil embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding was 88.6% with a clinical success rate of 56.8%. Minor and major complications occurred in 13.6 and 18.2% of patients, respectively. Intervention-associated mortality, due to intestinal ischemia, accounted for 4.6% of the total 18.2% mortality rate. Patients with technically successful embolization had a statistically significant increase in hemoglobin (P<0.01) after the intervention and a decrease in need for packed red blood cells, (P<0.01), fresh frozen plasma (P<0.01), and coagulation products (P<0.01). A smaller postinterventional fresh frozen plasma requirement was associated with a better clinical outcome (P=0.02). Microcoil embolization of arterial gastrointestinal bleeding in the acute situation has a high-technical success rate. The number of transfusions required before and after the intervention has no significant effect on technical success. Postinterventional fresh frozen plasma demand negatively correlates with clinical success.