Eligible Patient Population Research Articles

License for a CAR T: Examining patient eligibility

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of lymphoma and is now approved by the FDA for multiple indications. Given that the indications for CAR T-cell therapy are expanding, a larger patient population will be eligible to receive this treatment in the coming years. Pivotal clinical trials leading to FDA approval of CAR T-cell products required patients to have adequate organ function and good performance status. In the real world, however, the patient population eligible for CAR T-cell therapy includes patients who are older, frail, have poor performance status, and have multiple comorbidities. Studies have shown that CAR T-cell therapy is relatively safe and tolerable in such frail patients, however, there is no agreed upon consensus or guidelines to assess eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy at this moment. Gaining further insight into such patient populations will be vital in order to safely provide and expand access to CAR T-cell therapy.

Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments for Colorectal Cancer: A Data-Driven Whole Disease Simulation Model for Predicting the Number of Patients with Colorectal Cancer by Stage and Treatment Line in Australia

ObjectivesEffective healthcare planning, resource allocation, and budgeting require accurate predictions of the number of patients needing treatment at specific cancer stages and treatment lines. The Predicting the Population Health Economic Impact of Current and New Cancer Treatments (PRIMCAT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) simulation model (PRIMCAT-CRC) was developed to meet this requirement for all CRC stages and relevant molecular profiles in Australia. MethodsReal-world data were used to estimate treatment utilization and time-to-event distributions. This populated a discrete-event simulation, projecting the number of patients receiving treatment across all disease stages and treatment lines for CRC and forecasting the number of patients likely to utilize future treatments. Illustrative analyses were undertaken, estimating treatments across disease stages and treatment lines over a 5-year period (2022-2026). We demonstrated the model’s applicability through a case study introducing pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient stage IV. ResultsClinical registry data from 7163 patients informed the model. The model forecasts 15 738 incident and 2821 prevalent cases requiring treatment in 2022, rising to 15 921 and 2871, respectively, by 2026. Projections show that over 2022 to 2026, there will be a total of 116 752 treatments initiated, with 43% intended for stage IV disease. The introduction of pembrolizumab is projected for 706 patients annually, totaling 3530 individuals starting treatment with pembrolizumab over the forecasted period, without significantly altering downstream utilization of subsequent treatments. ConclusionsPRIMCAT-CRC is a versatile tool that can be used to estimate the eligible patient populations for novel cancer therapies, thereby reducing uncertainty for policymakers in decisions to publicly reimburse new treatments.

Performance of the open-first repair strategy in type A aortic dissection with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome eligible for delayed repair

ObjectiveFor patients with type A aortic dissection complicated by mesenteric malperfusion syndrome, some centers advocate a nontraditional approach based on up-front endovascular intervention and delayed open repair. However, the efficacy of this strategy cannot be understood without first understanding outcomes of the traditional open-first strategy in the same select patient population eligible for delayed repair, applying modern techniques of hybrid aortic surgery. MethodsPatients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome were queried from a single institution. Those presenting with aortic rupture, tamponade, or cardiogenic shock (ineligible for delayed repair) were excluded. Patients were managed with immediate open aortic repair. Short-term and long-term outcomes are reported. ResultsA total of 1228 patients were treated for acute type A dissection in the study period, of whom 77 were included in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort. In-hospital mortality was 29% compared with 39% in an identically selected mesenteric malperfusion syndrome population undergoing delayed repair reported previously. Among patients with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome, 32% underwent additional procedures addressing distal malperfusion in a hybrid operating room during or after open repair. Concomitant proximal malperfusion (coronary, cerebral, or upper extremity) was common in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort, present in 35% of cases. Although early mortality was greater in the mesenteric malperfusion syndrome cohort compared with all acute type A dissections, 10-year survival among those discharged alive was similar (65% vs 59%, P = .18). ConclusionsThe traditional open-first repair strategy performs equal to or better than the delayed repair strategy for patients with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome eligible for delayed repair.

Optimising patient outcomes: temporal trends in remission rates of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Australian OPAL dataset between 2009 and 2022.

To describe the trends in remission rates among RA patients in the OPAL dataset, spanning from 2009 to 2022, and provide insights into the effectiveness of evolving RA management approaches in real-world clinical settings. Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA and at least 3 visits between 1 January 2009 and December 2022 were identified in the OPAL dataset, an aggregated collection of data extracted from the electronic medical records of patients managed by 117 Australian rheumatologists. Demographics, disease history, prescribed medications and proportions of patients in Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28CRP)) categories (remission, low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA)) were described. A large population (n = 48,388) of eligible patients with RA were identified in the OPAL dataset. A consistent and substantial improvement in DAS28CRP remission rates were found in (i) all patients, (ii) patients managed on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) and (iii) patients treated with biological or targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARD therapy, increasing from approximately 50% in 2009 to over 70% by 2022. The increase in DAS28CRP remission was accompanied by reduced proportions of patients in MDA and HDA states. This study highlights a consistent improvement in disease activity and rising remission rates among Australian RA patients within the OPAL dataset, offering the potential for enhanced patient outcomes and reduced disease burden.

Applying a cost-based pricing model for innovative cancer treatments subject to indication expansion: A case study for pembrolizumab and daratumumab.

Expanding the indication of already approved immuno-oncology drugs presents treatment opportunities for patients but also strains healthcare systems. Cost-based pricing models are discussed as a possibility for cost containment. This study focuses on two drugs, pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and daratumumab (Darzalex), to explore the potential effect of indication broadening on the estimated price when using the cost-based pricing (CBP) model proposed by Uyl-de Groot and Löwenberg (2018). The model was used to calculate cumulative yearly prices, cumulative prices per indication, and non-cumulative indication-based prices using inputs such as research and development (R&D) costs, manufacturing costs, eligible patient population, and a profit margin. A deterministic stepwise analysis and scenario analysis were conducted to examine how sensitive the estimated price is to the different input assumptions. The yearly cumulative cost-based prices (CBPs) ranged from €52 to €885 for pembrolizumab per vial and €823 to €31,941 for daratumumab per vial. Prices were higher in initial years or indications due to smaller patient populations, decreased over time or after additional indications. Sensitivity analysis showed that the number of eligible patients had the most significant impact on the estimated price. In the scenario analysis the profit margin contributed most to a higher CBPs for both drugs. Lower estimates resulted from assumed lower R&D costs. The estimated CBPs are consistently lower than Dutch list prices for pembrolizumab (€2,861), mainly resulting from larger patient populations in registered indications. However, daratumumab's list prices fall within the range of modeled CBPs depending on the year or indication (€4,766). Both CBPs decrease over time or with additional indications. The number of eligible patients and initial R&D costs have the most significant influence on the CBPs. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussions on pharmaceutical pricing, especially concerning cancer drugs with expanding indications.

Estimated Spending on Beremagene Geperpavec for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

New gene therapies can offer substantial benefits to patients, particularly those with rare diseases who have few therapeutic options. In May 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first topical gene therapy, beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC), for treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). However, FDA approval was based on limited data in patients with autosomal dominant disease, even though they comprise approximately 50% of all DEB cases. To estimate projected spending in the US on B-VEC therapy for treating autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB. This economic evaluation used data from the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry to estimate the current population of US patients with autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive DEB, with the aim of estimating US spending on B-VEC therapy from an all-payers perspective during 1- and 3-year periods after FDA approval. A base-case cost of $300 000 per patient per year was assumed based on a report from the manufacturer (Krystal Biotech). Treatment with B-VEC. Estimated overall spending on B-VEC in the first year and over a 3-year period after FDA approval. Several prespecified sensitivity analyses with different assumptions about the eligible patient population and the cost of therapy were performed, and lifetime total costs of treatment per patient were estimated. The estimated number of US patients with DEB who were eligible for treatment with B-VEC in the first year after FDA approval was 894. The estimated total expenditure for B-VEC therapy was $268 million (range, $179 million-$357 million). Over a 3-year period, estimated spending was $805 million (range, $537 million-$1.1 billion). Estimated lifetime total costs per patient were $15 million (range, $10 million-$20 million) per patient with autosomal recessive DEB and $17 million (range, $11 million-$22 million) for patients with autosomal dominant DEB. Results of this economic evaluation suggest that the FDA's broad indication for the use of B-VEC in treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB will have significant implications for payers.

BUDGET IMPACT OF MIRIKIZUMAB-MRKZ IN THE TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY-TO-SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN THE UNITED STATES

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirikizumab (miri), an IL-23p19 antagonist, is undergoing US FDA review for treatment of moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults. However, the budget impact of its addition to payer formularies is unknown. METHODS A de novo budget impact model was developed to estimate the cost of introducing miri to the formulary of a hypothetical one-million-member health insurance plan. Epidemiological inputs drew primarily from published sources, while market research informed the current and future market share of advanced therapies. The model accounted for drug acquisition, drug administration, treatment monitoring, and adverse event management, derived from US prescribing information, trial results, and published sources. Discontinuation and dose escalation rates were based on the literature, applying assumptions where data gaps existed. In the base case, the model assumed that half of miri’s market share would be accrued from ustekinumab (an IL-12/IL-23 antagonist). The base-case analysis adopted a US commercial payer perspective over a 3-year period. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) assessed the implications of uncertainty in model inputs, while scenario analyses estimated budget impact under alternative assumptions about the origin of miri’s market share, and about the patient population under consideration. RESULTS In the base-case, 445, 480, and 515 patients were predicted eligible for advanced therapies for UC in Year1, Year2, and Year3, respectively with total UC drug management expenditures of $137.4 million over three years. Introducing miri to formulary for moderately-to-severely active UC yielded cumulative incremental costs of $1.3 million (relative impact=0.93%), equivalent to $0.04 per member per month (PMPM) or $0.43 per member per year (PMPY). Among patients who had already failed an advanced therapy, miri yielded lower cumulative incremental costs of $0.8 million (relative impact=1.1%), equivalent to $0.02 PMPM/$0.28 PMPY, consistent with the more narrowly defined eligible patient population (219, 252, and 284 patients in Year1, Year2, and Year3, respectively). In the scenario in which miri’s market share derived only from ustekinumab, the model predicted total cost savings of $2.6 million over three years (relative impact=-1.9%), as well as PMPM savings of $0.07 and PMPY savings of $0.85, due to higher estimated average drug costs associated with ustekinumab. DSA results suggested that base-case results were robust to uncertainty in the value of key model parameters. CONCLUSION Introducing miri to formulary for moderately-to-severely active UC may offer patients and clinicians an additional therapeutic option to manage this challenging and debilitating condition at minimal added cost to payers. The addition of miri to formulary could be relatively budget neutral or cost saving in some contexts.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is a novel and minimally invasive technological alternative for the management of acute or chronic appendicitis. Through endoscopic appendiceal intubation, obstructions such as appendiceal feces and parasites within the appendiceal lumen can be effectively eliminated, leading to patient recovery. Additionally, in cases where the orifices are swollen or complicated appendicitis is present, a stent may be inserted following appendiceal flushing. Due to the utilization of endoscopy for accessing the orifices of the appendix in order to alleviate appendiceal obstruction, patients were able to avoid undergoing appendectomy and experienced a reduced likelihood of recurrence when compared to antibiotic therapy. Additionally, the ERAT provided alternative options for individuals with appendicitis and comorbidities. Recent advancements in techniques, such as the “mother–baby” endoscopic system and the use of microbubble contrast agents, have expanded the range of indications and the eligible patient populations. The objective of this review is to present a comprehensive overview of the development, procedural aspects, therapeutic principles, treatment efficacy, therapeutic applications, and potential complications associated with ERAT.

Estimating the United States Patient Population Size Meeting Audiologic Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation.

This study aimed to estimate the size of the United States candidacy pool meeting expanded Center for Medicare Services criteria for cochlear implantation. Retrospective cross-sectional. Tertiary care center. Preimplantation audiometric data from 486 patients seen at a single academic medical center were collected retrospectively and used to generate a predictive model of AzBio score based on audiometric pure tone thresholds. This model was then used to estimate nationally representative cochlear implantation (CI)-candidacy using pure tone averages included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. We find that the estimated prevalence of CI candidacy in individuals 65 years of age or older is expected to more than double with a change in the CI candidacy criteria from ≤40% to ≤60% (from 1.42%, 95% confidence interval [1.33, 1.63] to 3.73% [2.71, 6.56]) on speech testing. We also found the greatest absolute increase in candidacy in the 80+ age group, increasing from 4.14% [3.72, 5.1] of the population meeting the ≤40% criteria to 12.12% [9.19, 18.35] meeting the ≤60% criteria. The United States population size meeting expanded CMS audiologic criteria for cochlear implantation is estimated to be 2.5 million adults and 2.1 million age 65 or older. Changing the CI candidacy criteria from ≤40% to ≤60% on CI testing has the greatest effect on the eligible patient population in the >65-year-old age group. The determination of utilization rates in newly eligible patients will require further study.

The Presence of Bulky Disease and/or Very High LDH Defines a High-Risk Subset of IPI 1-2 for Eligibility in Clinical Trials of Newly Diagnosed Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Background: The goal of clinical trial eligibility criteria is to identify a population of patients that have high risk disease or have unmet needs with standard of care therapy. Frontline trials of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) include patients with International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores of 3-5 as a way to identify a high risk population. Trials typically include patients with IPI score=2, and sometimes IPI score=1, to expand the eligible patient population. However, broader patient populations must be balanced by the potential inclusion of low-risk patients with excellent outcomes to standard of care therapy, leading to potentially underpowered trials. IPI is a sum of dichotomous variables which makes implementation easy but can result in heterogeneity in outcomes within IPI scores. This heterogeneity may be caused by unequal prognostic information across IPI variables, loss of information within IPI variables due to the use of cutoffs, as well as information captured by variables that are not included in the IPI. In prior modeling of outcomes in DLBCL (Maurer et al, AJH 2016), we identified that: i) LDH has a strong prognostic ability beyond the upper limit of normal (ULN) and ii) bulky disease is an independent variable for prognosis. Here we evaluate if the presence of either of these two variables, easily captured at diagnosis within the current standard clinical work-up, can identify a high-risk subset of patients within the population of those with IPI scores of 1-2. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma were enrolled within 6 months of diagnosis in the LEO Cohort at 8 academic medical centers from 2015-2020 and prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria for this analysis was aggressive B-cell lymphoma typically included in frontline trials (e.g. DLBCL, high grade B-cell lymphoma, FL3B), IPI 1-5, frontline therapy with rituximab and anthracycline-based chemotherapy, stage II-IV disease and ages 18-80 years. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis until progression, initiation of 2 nd line therapy, or death due to any cause; EFS was evaluated at 24 months (EFS24). Very high LDH was defined as LDH>1.3xULN based on prior modeling (Maurer et al, AJH 2016) and bulky disease was defined as maximum tumor diameter (MTD) of 7cm or greater. IPI 1 and 2 were first evaluated separately and then combined due to similar outcomes in patients with very high LDH and/or bulky disease. High risk IPI1-2 was defined as the presence of either bulky disease and/or very high LDH within an IPI score of 1-2. Confirmation was performed in a similar cohort of patients enrolled in the Iowa/Mayo SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) from 2002-2015; bulky disease was defined using a 10cm cutoff per availability in MER data collection forms. Results: 1560 patients from LEO were analyzed; median age was 64 years (IQR: 54-71), 42% were female and 83% had stage III/IV disease; subtype was DLBCL, NOS in 1335 (86%). IPI was 1-2 in 766 patients, 3 in 496 patients and 4-5 in 298 patients ( table). 391 (51%) with IPI1-2 had either bulky disease and/or very high LDH (high risk IPI1-2) and 375 had low-risk IPI1-2. EFS24 in high risk IPI1-2 (71.6%, 95% CI: 67.2-76.3) was significantly inferior to IPI1-2 without bulky disease or very high LDH (85.2, 95% CI: 81.7-88.9 logrank p=0.0035, figure) and similar to patients with IPI3 (70.7%, 95% CI: 66.8-74.9). Consistent results were observed in 1014 patients analyzed in the MER using a higher cutoff for bulky disease (10cm) due to data availability ( table). Patients with high risk IPI1-2 had significantly shorter diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in both the LEO (per-week OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88) and MER (per-week OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.87) cohorts compared to low risk IPI1-2, both p<0.0001). In sensitivity analysis, LEO results were similar when performed in the subset of patients with DLBCL, NOS. Conclusion: The presence of either bulky disease and/or very high LDH at presentation identifies a high-risk subset of patients with IPI 1-2 that have similar outcomes to patients with IPI 3 disease. These simple criteria can be easily implemented within existing clinical trial diagnostic work-ups. Future trial designs in frontline aggressive B-cell lymphoma should include patients with IPI 3-5 and patients with IPI 1-2 with either bulky disease and/or very high LDH to better define a high-risk population of patients for clinical trial eligibility.

Hemoadsorption Using CytoSorb® in Patients with Infective Endocarditis: A German-Based Budget Impact Analysis.

A considerable number of infective endocarditis (IE) patients require cardiac surgery with an increased risk for postoperative sepsis. Intraoperative hemoadsorption may diminish the risk of postoperative hyperinflammation with potential economic implications for intensive care unit (ICU) occupation. The present study aimed to theoretically investigate the budget impact of a reduced length of ICU stay in IE patients treated with intraoperative hemoadsorption in the German healthcare system. Data on ICU occupation were extrapolated from a retrospective study on IE patients treated with hemoadsorption. An Excel-based budget impact model was developed to simulate the patient course over the ICU stay. A base-case scenario without therapy reimbursement and a scenario with full therapy reimbursement were explored. The annual eligible German IE patient population was derived from official German Diagnostic-Related Group (DRG) volume data. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the uncertainty over the model results. The use of intraoperative hemoadsorption resulted in EUR 2298 being saved per patient in the base-case scenario without therapy reimbursement. The savings increased to EUR 3804 per patient in the case of full device-specific reimbursement. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of savings, with a probability of savings of 87% and 99% in the base-case and full reimbursement scenario, respectively. Intraoperative hemoadsorption in IE patients might have relevant economic benefits related to reduced ICU stays, resulting in improved resource use. Further evaluations in larger prospective cohorts are warranted.

Budgetary impact of new label indications after initial drug registration in Brazil: A case study of pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan

The pharmaceutical landscape has undergone a transformative shift due to emerging technologies, leading to a projected value of USD 405.52 billion for the global pharmaceutical manufacturing market in 2020. Brazil, representing 2% of the global pharmaceutical market, boasts a comprehensive public health system called Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), ensuring universal health coverage. However, the public and private health sectors in Brazil operate independently, with 23% of Brazilians possessing private health insurance plans. Regulated by the Brazilian Drug Market Regulation Chamber (CMED), which controls drug prices based on international retail prices and other factors, the pharmaceutical market in Brazil faces significant challenges in maintaining the sustainability of the Brazilian health-care system, particularly due to the high costs of cancer medications, such as pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan. This study aims to assess the budgetary impact of expanding indications for pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan in Brazil after their initial registration by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. Utilizing epidemiological data from the National Cancer Institute (INCA) and clinical trial data, we estimated the eligible patient populations and associated costs for these medications. Trastuzumab deruxtecan’s eligible patient population increased from 383 to 23,000 across various indications, resulting in a total cost increase from USD 90.6 million to USD 5.0 billion. Similarly, pembrolizumab’s eligible patient population expanded from 1796 to 99,544 for multiple indications, causing the total cost increase from USD 121.1 million to USD 6.7 billion. The study highlights the substantial expansions in indications and patient eligibility for trastuzumab deruxtecan and pembrolizumab in Brazil, with significant budgetary implications potentially jeopardizing the health-care system’s sustainability. To ensure the long-term sustainability of health-care systems and to provide equitable access to optimal treatments, it is crucial for policymakers to monitor and adjust drug prices following their initial registration. Policymakers must be aware of these challenges and consider them in health-care policy development and decision-making processes.

Mitigating inequity: ethically prioritizing patients for CAR T-cell therapy

AbstractManufacturing capacity and institutional infrastructure to deliver chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T) are pressured to keep pace with the growing number of approved products and expanding eligible patient population for this potentially life-saving therapy. Consequently, many cell therapy programs must make difficult decisions about which patient should get the next available treatment slot. This situation requires an ethical framework to ensure fair and equitable decision-making. In this perspective, we discuss the application of Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R), a priority-setting framework grounded in procedural justice, to the problem of limited CAR-T slots at our institution. We formed a multidisciplinary working group spanning several hematological malignancies. Through multiple rounds of partner engagement, we used A4R guiding principles to identify 4 main criteria to prioritize patients for CAR-T: medical benefit, safety/risk of complications, psychosocial factors, and medical urgency. Associated measures/tools and an implementation process were developed. We discuss further how ethical principles of fairness and equity demand a consistent approach within health systems that does not disadvantage medically underserved or underrepresented populations and supports overcoming barriers to care. In our commitment to transparency and collaboration, we make our tools available to others, ideally to be used to engage in their own A4R process, adapting the tools to their unique environments. Our hope is that our preliminary work will support the advancement of further study in this area globally, aiming for justice in resource allocation for all potential CAR-T candidates, wherever they may seek care.

Proteogenomic Approaches for the Identification of NF1/Neurofibromin-depleted Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancers for Targeted Treatment.

A major challenge for targeting the consequence of tumor suppressor disruption is the accurate assessment of protein functional inactivation. NF1 can repress both RAS and ER signaling, and a ComboMATCH trial is underway to treat the patients with binimetinib and fulvestrant. Herein we report a MS-verified NF1 IHC assay that can determine a threshold for NF1 loss to predict treatment response. These approaches may be used to identify and expand the eligible patient population.

Patients’ epidemiology in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A real-world analysis in Brazil.

e20589 Background: Although breakthrough therapy options for NSCLC have emerged in the last few years, lung cancer is still the principal cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women worldwide. In Brazil, lung cancer is the major cause of cancer mortality – the second most common cause of cancer-related death in females and the first cause among males. The main factors contributing to the high burden of the disease remain the late-stage diagnosis and unequal healthcare access, which are most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to describe lung cancer epidemiology – patients in stage III, unresectable NSCLC that could benefit from consolidation therapy after chemoradiation (CRT) treatment - in the Brazilian public health system for evaluating the future impact of new therapies. Methods: We gathered information on lung cancer procedures performed between January 2018 and October 2022 using the Brazilian public health system database (DATASUS). Since this is a claim medical database without clinical data, assumptions were specified based on procedures performed to determine the potential number of patients in Brazil who would benefit from these new treatment strategies in stage III NSCLC. The assumptions were the following: 1. Having received systemic therapy for a malignant tumor of the bronchi and lung (ICD-10 - C34); 2. Having received a pre-defined list of chemotherapy regimens (to define which patients were NSCLC); 3. Having started systemic therapy with a Stage III tumor; 4. Having not undergone surgery between three months before and two months following the start of systemic treatment 5. Treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (concomitantly or sequentially - until two months later); 6. Patients who died or progressed during treatment were classified as incomplete treatment. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, we identified an average of 9,340 patients each year who started therapies for lung cancer; 75% (7,023) of them performed specific procedures for NSCLC and were classified as such. 21% (1,472) of patients started treatment for stage III NSCLC, and 98% (1,438) of these cases were unresectable. Of these, 26% (377) received chemotherapy and radiation, 92% of whom finished the course of treatment. In Brazil, 346 patients per year with stage III unresectable NSCLC could be treated with consolidation therapy after CRT in the public health system. Conclusions: The number of NSCLC patients who can benefit from consolidation therapy after CRT (346) represents 3.7% of all lung cancer patients starting systemic treatment annually. It allows a better management of the possible economic impact of the addition of this new therapy in the Brazilian health public system. Increased screening for early diagnosis and improving access to CRT would expand the patient population eligible for this therapeutic approach.

Eligibility of patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer for biology-guided radiotherapy in a retrospective cohort.

e16100 Background: Biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) is a novel radiotherapy modality that uses real-time positron emission tomography (PET) to guide radiotherapy beamlets. The FDA recently cleared BgRT for clinical use for tumors in lung and bone using 18F FDG radiotracer. We sought to identify esophageal cancer (EC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) patients who may be BgRT candidates based on diagnostic FDG PET/CT imaging. Methods: Through IRB-approved extraction of patient medical record data from an institutional repository of prospectively maintained data, we verified a database of EC and GEJC patients diagnosed at a US tertiary care center between 01/01/2006 and 12/31/2013. When insufficient diagnostic clinical information was present, patients were excluded. Patient and tumor qualities were quantified and subjected to parameters of tumor diameter (≥2cm, <5cm) and maximum standardized uptake value (≥6) to observe potential characteristics of a patient population eligible for this novel BgRT mechanism. Results: Thirty patients met tumor size and FDG uptake criteria for BgRT therapy out of an overall patient cohort of 90 patients. A significantly greater proportion of patients within the BgRT-eligible cohort presented with esophageal tumors (83.3%) compared to non-eligible patients (58.3%, P=0.0177). Otherwise, there was no significant variation of patient sex, race, tumor histology, tumor stage, comorbidity score, and pre-treatment weight loss between patients eligible and not eligible for BgRT therapy. Conclusions: After applying current boundaries of tumor size and radiotracer uptake for effective BgRT intervention, we observed broad applicability of the novel treatment modality across EC/ GEJC patients of varying characteristics and tumor qualities. The high eligibility of patients with tumors located within the esophagus supports further investigation of BgRT in their management. [Table: see text]

Abstract 21: Clinical Trials in Gastroesophageal Cancers: An Analysis of the Global Landscape of Interventional Trials From ClinicalTrials.gov

Abstract Purpose: This study aims to describe the global landscape of clinical research into interventions for gastroesophageal (GE) cancers, which are a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. We examine trial characteristics, focusing on geographic distribution of trial sites, participation of low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), and factors associated with premature trial termination. Methods: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov database to identify all completed or terminated Phase III interventional studies investigating GE cancers (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) and gastric adenocarcinoma). All reported characteristics were extracted. Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare differences in completed and terminated trials. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of termination. Results: A total of 179 trials were identified; 90% were therapeutic. Most included sites in Asia (61%), Europe (32%), and North America (23%); few included sites in South America (9%), Africa (4%), and Oceania (9%). 63% of trials included high-income countries (HICs) sites alone; only 7% included sites in lower-middle or low-income countries. Most (70%) focused exclusively on gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, 13% on EAC and ESCC, and 9% ESCC alone. 16% (n=29) of trials terminated, most due to accrual difficulties (n=13, 44%). In multivariate analysis, study site number, location, and eligible patient population emerged as predictors of termination. Trials conducted exclusively in the US were more likely to terminate (OR 7.22 [95% CI 1.59-32.69]). Conversely, trials conducted exclusively in LMICs were less likely to terminate (OR 0.04 [95% CI 0.01-0.59] v conducted in HIC alone). Studies on ESCC were more likely to terminate (OR 17.74 [95%CI 1.49-210.69]). Trial design characteristics, intervention characteristics, and funding sources were not associated with termination. Conclusion: Although 80% of GE malignancies occur in LMICs, trial activity disproportionately occurs in HICs. Few trials focus on EAC/ESCC despite being highly fatal, highlighting an unmet need. Geographic location of trial sites emerged as a predictor of trial termination, with studies involving LMICs sites less likely to terminate prematurely. This finding highlights the potential benefit of including LMICs in future clinical trials to advance research for these diseases. Citation Format: Ayo Falade, Oluwatayo Adeoye, Geoffrey Buckle. Clinical Trials in Gastroesophageal Cancers: An Analysis of the Global Landscape of Interventional Trials From ClinicalTrials.gov [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Closing the Research-to-Implementation Gap; 2023 Apr 4-6. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 21.

Main Street, USA Enrollment: Community Hospital Recruitment Strategies for Diverse and Equitable Selection of Pregnant Participants in a Prospective Cohort Study [ID: 1377833

INTRODUCTION: The same factors contributing to disproportionately worse health outcomes are also barriers to inclusion in research for Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous patients. In this subanalysis of a large, multisite prospective cohort study of maternal plasma mRNA signatures and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), we sought to determine whether equitable representation was aided by the inclusion of a large community hospital as an enrollment site. METHODS: Pregnant persons between 18 and 45 year old with a singleton pregnancy eligible to enroll in this IRB-approved prospective cohort study at Woman’s Hospital (Baton Rouge, Louisiana). A hybrid of indirect and direct recruitment strategies, bolstered by text message communication and gift card compensation, were deployed to facilitate enrollment that mirrored the community’s diversity. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred twenty-two participants have been enrolled over 22 months (18% of the hospital’s eligible patient population): 41% of participants are Black, 9% are of Hispanic origin, 50% are White, and 9% Other race. This identically mirrors the demographics of the hospital obstetric patient population (38% Black, 7% Hispanic, 49% White, and 13% Other). CONCLUSION: Participants overall mirrored the diverse population served. Inclusion of study sites outside of the traditional academic setting is an effective strategy for promoting equitable access to clinical research, combating barriers to inclusion in research faced by the populations that are disproportionately affected by APOs.

Reversal of liver failure using a bioartificial liver device implanted with clinical-grade human-induced hepatocytes

Liver resection is the first-line treatment for primary liver cancers, providing the potential for a cure. However, concerns about post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), a leading cause of death following extended liver resection, have restricted the population of eligible patients. Here, we engineered a clinical-grade bioartificial liver (BAL) device employing human-induced hepatocytes (hiHeps) manufactured under GMP conditions. In a porcine PHLF model, the hiHep-BAL treatment showed a remarkable survival benefit. On top of the supportive function, hiHep-BAL treatment restored functions, specifically ammonia detoxification, of the remnant liver and facilitated liver regeneration. Notably, an investigator-initiated study in seven patients with extended liver resection demonstrated that hiHep-BAL treatment was well tolerated and associated with improved liver function and liver regeneration, meeting the primary outcome of safety and feasibility. These encouraging results warrant further testing of hiHep-BAL for PHLF, the success of which would broaden the population of patients eligible for liver resection.

Child-Pugh Class B or C Liver Disease Increases the Risk of Early Mortality in Patients With Hepatitis C Undergoing Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty Regardless of Treatment Status.

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing primary elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are at increased risk of postoperative complications. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, specifically Child-Pugh Class B and C, who are undergoing general surgery have high 2-year mortality risks, approaching 60% to 80%. However, the role of Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease classifications of liver status in predicting survivorship among patients with HCV undergoing elective arthroplasty has not been elucidated. What factors are independently associated with early mortality (< 2 years) in patients with HCV undergoing arthroplasty? We performed a retrospective study at three tertiary academic medical centers and identified patients with HCV undergoing primary elective TJA between January 2005 and December 2019. Patients who underwent revision TJA and simultaneous primary TJA were excluded. A total of 226 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. A further 25% (57) were excluded because they were lost to follow-up before the minimum study requirement of 2 years of follow-up or had incomplete datasets. After the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, the final cohort consisted of 75% (169 of 226) of the initial patient population eligible for analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 53 ± 29 months. We compared confounding variables for mortality between patients with early mortality (16 patients) and surviving patients (153 patients), including comorbidities, HCV and liver characteristics, HCV treatment, and postoperative medical and surgical complications. Patients with early postoperative mortality were more likely to have an associated advanced Child-Pugh classification and comorbidities including peripheral vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, both groups had similar 90-day and 1-year medical complication risks including myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and reoperations for periprosthetic joint infection and mechanical failure. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with early mortality, incorporating all significant variables with p < 0.05 present in the univariate analysis. After accounting for significant variables in the univariate analysis such as peripheral vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver fibrosis staging, Child-Pugh Class B or C classification was found to be the sole factor independently associated with increased odds of early (within 2 years) mortality in patients with HCV undergoing elective TJA (adjusted odds ratio 29 [95% confidence interval 5 to 174]; p < 0.001). The risk of early mortality in patients with Child-Pugh Class B or C was 64% (seven of 11) compared with 6% (nine of 158) in patients with Child-Pugh Class A (p < 0.001). Patients with HCV and a Child-Pugh Class B or C at the time of elective TJA had substantially increased odds of death, regardless of liver function, cirrhosis, age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease level, HCV treatment, and viral load status. This is similar to the risk of early mortality observed in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing abdominal and cardiac surgery. Surgeons should avoid these major elective procedures in patients with Child-Pugh Class B or C whenever possible. For patients who feel their arthritic symptoms and pain are unbearable, surgeons need to be clear that the risk of death is considerably elevated. Level III, therapeutic study.