Elevated Serum CEA Levels Research Articles

Analysis of enhanced CT imaging signs and clinicopathological prognostic factors in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach patients with radical surgery: a retrospective study

BackgroundTo investigate the association between CT signs and clinicopathological features and disease recurrence in patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach (HAS).MethodsForty nine HAS patients undergoing radical surgery were retrospectively collected. Association between CT and clinicopathological features and disease recurrence was analyzed. Multivariate logistic model was constructed and evaluated for predicting recurrence by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Survival curves between model-defined risk groups was compared using Kaplan–Meier method.Results24(49.0%) patients developed disease recurrence. Multivariate logistic analysis results showed elevated serum CEA level, peritumoral fatty space invasion and positive pathological vascular tumor thrombus were independent factors for disease recurrence. Odds ratios were 10.87 (95%CI, 1.14–103.66), 6.83 (95%CI, 1.08–43.08) and 42.67 (95%CI, 3.66–496.85), respectively. The constructed model showed an area under ROC of 0.912 (95%CI,0.825–0.999). The model-defined high-risk group showed poorer overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the low-risk group (both P < 0.001).ConclusionsPreoperative CT appearance of peritumoral fatty space invasion, elevated serum CEA level, and pathological vascular tumor thrombus indicated poor prognosis of HAS patients.

Misdiagnosed appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and primary ovarian mucinous tumors present with different pre- and intraoperative characteristics.

ObjectiveTo identify the differences between the pre- and intraoperative characteristics in misdiagnosed appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) and those in primary ovarian mucinous tumors (POMTs) and to establish an effective model for differentiating AMNs from pelvic mucinous tumors.MethodsThis study enrolled 70 AMN patients who were misdiagnosed with ovarian tumors and 140 POMT patients who were treated from November 1998 to April 2021 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The clinical features and operative findings of the two groups of patients were collected and compared.ResultsThere were significant differences in age and menopausal status, but no difference in the patients’ clinical manifestations between the two groups. The preoperative serum CA125 and CA199 levels were not different between the two groups. The CEA level (31.04 ± 42.7 vs. 7.11 ± 24.2 ng/ml) was higher in the misdiagnosed AMN group (P < 0.001). The AMNs were smaller than the POMTs that were measured preoperatively by ultrasonography (US) (P<0.05) and measured at surgery (P<0.05). Furthermore, the patients with AMNs more commonly had multinodularity and ascites noted on the preoperative US (P<0.001), on CT (P<0.001), and at surgery (P< 0.001). The two groups also differed in the presence of bilateral disease, in the appendiceal appearance and peritoneal dissemination. Subsequently, a prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, which was evaluated through internal validation.ConclusionsThe suspicion of a nongenital organs originated tumor especially origing from appendiceal should be considered in a patient who is older, tumor size less than 12cm, multinodular, presence of mucinous ascites, and elevated serum CEA levels. Bilateral ovarian involvement, peritoneal dissemination, and an abnormal appendiceal appearance found during surgery were the typical features associated with AMNs.

Intraductal carcinoma of the retromolar trigone found with elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 levels: a case report

Intraductal carcinoma (IDC) is a rare salivary gland tumor, classified according to the 4th WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors in 2017. The tumor affects the parotid gland much more frequently than the minor salivary glands. It’s often asymptomatic. We report a case of IDC of the left retromolar trigon occurring in an 81-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with high serum CEA and CA19-9 at a medical examination. Examinations of her gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and mammary glands were conducted, resulting in no abnormal findings. FDG-PET showed abnormal uptake only in the left retromolar trigon, and a painless mass was observed. A biopsy of this tumor indicated it was likely a low-grade salivary gland tumor. The tumor was completely removed, along with sufficient margins. Histological examination revealed that the lesion was composed of alveolar nests showing an expanded duct-like structure surrounded by an intact myoepithelial layer, with no evidence of infiltration. The final diagnosis was IDC. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient’s serum CEA and CA19-9 levels decreased to within normal range. We believe that serum CEA and CA19-9 levels could be used for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic effect for this tumor.

Oligometastatic pulmonary metastasis in pancreatic cancer patients: Safety and outcome of resection

ObjectiveTo assess the perioperative and long-term outcome following pulmonary resection in patients with metachronous metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BackgroundMost patients with PDAC relapse or develop tumor spread to secondary organs. Currently, it remains unclear how to proceed with pulmonary metastasis in the metachronous setting. In particular, the role of surgery remains controversial. MethodsData of patients with pulmonary metachronous metastasis after PDAC collected from 2003 to 2015 in databases of two high-volume pancreatic cancer centers were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological aspects of primary PDAC as well as the perioperative and long-term outcome following pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) was evaluated, respectively. Patients with synchronous liver metastasis or metastasis to other secondary organs were excluded. Univariate survival analysis was performed. ResultsWe identified 15 patients undergoing pulmonary resection for suspected metastasis after primary pancreatic resection. Operative and histopathologic evaluation revealed resectable pancreatic pulmonary metastasis in 11 patients (73.3%). The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after PM diagnosis was 18 months and 26 months, respectively. The median time to metachronous metastasis (TMM) was 17 months [3–64 months]. Perioperative morbidity was low with only one readmission (8.3%). There was no perioperative mortality. Patients who developed pulmonary metastasis later than 17 months after primary surgery showed better OS compared to those who did earlier (32.2 vs. 14.75 months, p = 0.025). In addition, patients with high-grade tumors had worse survival (12.4 vs. 31 months, p = 0.02). Elevated serum CEA levels or CA 19-9 levels were also not associated with shortened OS. ConclusionsThis study suggests that pulmonary metastasectomy after PDAC is safe and effective. Patients with extended DFS after primary pancreatic surgery as well as favorable tumor grading seem to particularly benefit from pulmonary surgery.

Lung Metastasectomy in Pulmonary Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

Patients with colorectal cancer are often affected by liver and lung metastases. Besides systemic therapies, lung metastasectomy is a suitable treatment option after complete resection of primary colorectal carcinoma and even concomitant liver metastases. We have performed a systematical literature research of all studies published after 01. 01. 2010. Studies reporting on at least 100 patients undergoing lung metastasectomy after 01. 01. 2000 have been included in our final analysis. Operative data, survival data and prognostic factors have been extracted. Eleven study cohorts reporting on 2,891 patients could be included in the final analysis. Complete resection could be achieved in most cases and thoracic surgeons preferred subsegmental resections. Pathological examination revealed thoracic lymph node involvement in 2.3 to 18.2% of patients. The postoperative mortality varied from 0 to 0.5%. The median follow up ranged between 27.5 and 65.1 months. Pulmonary metastasectomy resulted in 5-year survival rates of 53 to 75.5% and 5-year progression-free survival rates of 33 to 50.9%. Intrathoracic recurrence occurred in 25.2 to 42.9% of patients with complete resection and five-year survival rates ranged from 49 to 75.5% after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy. Analysis of prognostic factors revealed that number, size and distribution of lung metastases are minor important prognostic factors. Moreover, current data suggest disadvantageous post-metastasectomy survival for patients with elevated pre-metastasectomy serum CEA level or intrathoracic lymph node metastases in comparison with the control groups. Nevertheless, even in these patients, lung metastasectomy might be a beneficial procedure. In patients with colorectal cancer and resectable isolated lung or combined liver and lung metastases pulmonary resection should be the treatment of choice. Pulmonary metastasectomy should be combined with thoracic lymph node resection to remove potential lymph node metastases. Repeat metastasectomy should be offered to patients suffering from isolated intrathoracic recurrence.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers and is increased in 30%–60% of patients with pancreatic cancer. Although carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most important serum biomarker in pancreatic cancer, the diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA is gradually being recognized.Materials and methodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched for related literature published until January 2017. Diagnostic accuracy variables were pooled using the Meta-Disc software. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for prognostic data were calculated and analyzed using Stata software.ResultsA total of 3,650 participants enrolled in 19 studies met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of a CEA-based panel were 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.50), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86–0.91), 5.39 (95% CI, 3.16–9.18), and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41–0.72), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC, 0.90) and Q-value (0.84) of the CEA-based panel indicated a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with CEA or CA19-9 alone. Moreover, there was also a significant association between high levels of CEA and worse overall survival (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.31–1.56).ConclusionOur meta-analysis indicated that elevated serum CEA level, as a vital supplementary to CA19-9, can play an important role in the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer patients and predict poor prognosis.

Differences of protein expression profiles, KRAS and BRAF mutation, and prognosis in right-sided colon, left-sided colon and rectal cancer

To compare protein expression levels, gene mutation and survival among Right-Sided Colon Cancer (RSCC), Left-Sided Colon Cancer (LSCC) and rectal cancer patients, 57 cases of RSCC, 87 LSCC and 145 rectal cancer patients were included retrospectively. Our results demonstrated significant differences existed among RSCC, LSCC and rectal cancer regarding tumor diameter, differentiation, invasion depth and TNM stage. No significant difference was identified in expression levels of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, β-Tubulin III, P53, Ki67 and TOPIIα, and gene mutation of KRAS and BRAF among three groups. Progression Free Survival (PFS) of RSCC was significantly lower than that of LRCC and rectal cancer. In univariate analyses, RSCC, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, poor differentiation, advanced TNM stage, elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 level, tumor deposit, perineural and vascular invasion were found to be predictive factors of shorter PFS. In multivariate analyses, only differentiation and TNM stages were found to be independent predictors of PFS. In conclusion, compared with LSCC and rectal cancer, RSCC has larger tumor size, poor differentiation, advanced TNM stage and shorter survival. The shorter survival in RSCC might be attributed to the advanced tumor stage caused by its inherent position feature of proximal colon rather than genetic difference.

Monitoring response of PDL-1 directed immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC using serum CEA levels.

e20509 Background: Immunotherapy (IT) response measurements in advanced NSCLC management are evolving. We describe here our retrospective single institutional experience in measuring serum CEA levels as an early response determinant and correlation with radiographic assesment. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed after obtaining IRB approval. Demographic information, stage, histology, prior treatment, IT agent used, radiographic response assesment and serum CEA levels were recorded. Patients were evaluable if they had elevated baseline serum CEA levels (normal range non smokers: 0-3 ng/ml, smokers 0-5 ng/ml), had recieved at least two cycles of IT and had radiographic response assessment performed. Results: Six eligible patients were identified. Median age 60 yrs; M:F1:5, SCC n=1, Adeno: n=5; Smoking history positive n=4; Stage IV n=6, EGFR mut+ n=2; IT agent used: nivolumab: n=5; atezolizumab: n=1. IT as 1st line of Rx n=1; 2nd line n=3, 3rd line: n=2. On first radiographic assesment: three patients had progressive disease (PD), Two patients had PR, one patient (#1) had an intial PR and subsequently PD with subsequent rise in CEA level to 16.1 corelating with PD on radiographs. Conclusions: Serum CEA levels appear to correlate well with response assesment in patients with advanced NSCLC while being treated with immunotherapy. This small study is hypothesis generating and is currently being evaluated in a larger series. [Table: see text]

Repeated adjuvant anti‐CEA radioimmunotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases: Safety, feasibility, and long‐term efficacy results of a prospective phase 2 study

In previous work, a single administration of anticarcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) 131 I-labetuzumab radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after complete resection of colorectal liver metastases was well tolerated and significantly improved survival compared with controls. In the current phase 2 trial, the authors studied repeated RIT in the same setting, examining safety, feasibility, and efficacy. Sixty-three patients (median age, 64.5 years) received RIT at 40 to 50 millicuries/m2 per dose. Before the receipt of RIT, restaging was performed with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission to confirm that patients were "truly adjuvant." Patients who had elevated serum CEA levels or radiographically inconclusive new lesions were classified as "possibly nonadjuvant," but they also received RIT. Time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. The median follow-up was 54 months. After the first course of RIT, 14 of 63 patients experienced National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 4 hematotoxicity; 19 patients did not receive the second course of RIT because of impaired performance status (N = 5) or relapse (N = 14). After the second course of RIT, 9 of 44 patients experienced National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 4 hematotoxicity. Five patients developed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) from 22 to 55 months after their last RIT. The median TTP, OS, and CSS for all patients were 16, 55, and 60 months, respectively. The "truly adjuvant" patients (N = 39) had an improved median TTP (not reached vs 6.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.12; P < .001), OS (75.6 vs 33.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.44; P = .014), and CSS (not reached vs 41.4 months; hazard ratio,0.42; P = .014) compared with "possibly nonadjuvant" patients (N = 24). Repeated RIT with 131 I-labetuzumab is feasible but is associated with hematotoxicity. Survival is very encouraging, especially for "truly adjuvant" patients. However, the maximum safe dose of 131 I-labetuzumab is a single administration of 50 millicuries/m2 . Cancer 2017;123:638-649. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Recognition of "aggressive" behavior in "indolent" ground glass opacity and mixed density lesions.

Radiologically characteristic ground-glass opacity (GGO) represents a special cohort of pulmonary adenocarcinomas that has been unanimously defined as biologically inert. Lymph node metastasis, however, occurs occasionally in these biologically "indolent" cancers. The incidence and underlying risk factors of nodal metastasis remain unknown. All surgically removed GGO lesions between January 2008 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed from a single treatment institution. Pathologically-confirmed adenocarcinomas with systemic lymph node dissection or sampling were enrolled into the present study. All the lesions were classified into three groups according to the proportion of solid densities: group I, pure GGO; group II, 1% to 50%; and group III, 50% to 79%. Risk factor analysis of lymph node involvement was performed by multivariate logistic regression. Of the 867 patients eligible for this study, 553 (63.7%) presented as pure GGOs (Group I) and 314 (36.2%) were mixed GGOs, of which 160 (18.5%) were in group II and 154 (17.8%) in group III. Lymph node metastasis was confirmed in 25 patients, among these 25 cases, 11 (11/160) were group II and 14 (14/154) were group III; two of the 25 patients died from lung cancer metastases at their postoperative 23(rd) and 36(th) month, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed three predictors for lymph nodal metastasis: tumor size, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level and proportion of the mix density. A larger size, mixed GGOs with a higher proportion of solid component, and elevated serum CEA level were associated with a higher preference for nodal metastasis.

The prognostic significance of pretreatment serum CEA levels in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis including 14651 patients.

BackgroundCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is commonly used as a serum tumor marker in clinical practice; however, its prognostic value for gastric cancer patients remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of CEA and investigate CEA as a tumor marker.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and other databases were searched for potentially eligible studies. Forty-one studies reporting the prognostic effect of pretreatment serum CEA expression in gastric cancer patients were selected. Data on 14651 eligible patients were retrieved for the meta-analysis. Based on the data extracted from the available literature, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for an adverse prognosis were estimated for gastric cancer patients with elevated pretreatment serum levels of CEA (CEA+) relative to patients with normal pretreatment CEA levels (CEA-).ResultsThe CEA+ patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than the CEA- patients in terms of overall survival (OS: HR 1.716, 95% CI 1.594 - 1.848, P< 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS: HR 1.940, 95% CI 1.563 - 2.408, P< 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS: HR 2.275, 95% CI 1.836 - 2.818, P< 0.001). Publication bias and an influence of different cut-off values were not observed (all P> 0.05). In the pooled analyses of multivariate-adjusted HRs, the results suggested that pretreatment serum CEA may be an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (OS: HR 1.681, 95% CI 1.425 - 1.982; DSS: HR 1.900, 95% CI 1.441 - 2.505; DFS: HR 2.579, 95% CI 1.935 - 3.436).Conclusion/SignificanceThe meta-analysis based on the available literature supported the association of elevated pretreatment serum CEA levels with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer and a nearly doubled risk of mortality in gastric cancer patients. CEA may be an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients and may aid in determining appropriate treatment which may preferentially benefit the CEA+ patients.

Repeated anti-CEA-radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) with 131iodine-labetuzumab after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM): Long-term results of a prospective phase II study.

719 Background: Previously, single anti-CEA-radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) with 131iodine(I)-labetuzumab after complete (R0) resection of CEA-positive CLM was well tolerated and improved overall survival (OS) compared to a control group without RAIT. In this phase II study, we examined safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy of repeated RAIT in the same setting. Methods: After R0-resection of CEA-positive CLM, 63 pts (42 m, 21 f; median age, 64.5 yrs) with synchronous (n=33) or metachronous (n=30) CLM received RAIT with 40-50 mCi/m2 per dose. 45 pts were intermediate/high risk for early metastatic relapse according to the Fong score. Restaging with CT/MRI and FDG-PET was performed prior to each RAIT. Pts with persistent elevated serum CEA-levels or inconclusive lesions during post-operative restaging received RAIT, but were classified as “non-adjuvant.” Toxicity was classified according to NCI-CTC v2.0. Time to progression (TTP), OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. The median follow-up was 54 (range 6-127) mos. Results: After the first cycle of RAIT 14 of 63 pts experienced grade 4 hematological toxicity. Nineteen pts did not receive the second cycle of RAIT due to prolonged toxicity, impaired performance status (n=6), or metastatic relapse (n=13). The latter were further treated by resection (n=3) or systemic chemotherapy (n=10). Forty-four pts received the planned second cycle of RAIT. Of these, 4 pts newly experienced grade 4 hematological toxicity. For all 63 pts, the median TTP, OS and CSS were 13, 57 and 92 months, respectively. The truly “adjuvant” pts (n=39) had a an improved median TTP (26 vs. 6.6 mos, p&lt;0.0001), OS (76 vs. 42 mos, p=0.03) and CSS (not reached vs. 42 mos, p=0.003) in comparison to “non-adjuvant” pts (n=24). Conclusions: Repeated anti-CEA-RAIT with 131I-labetuzumab is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated (100% compliance), with expected hematological toxicity. The long-term survival after RAIT is very encouraging, in particular for pts deemed truly “adjuvant” post-salvage resection of CLM at restaging prior to RAIT.

Clinical outcome of subcentimeter non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: single institution experience of 105 patients.

The detection of subcentimeter lung cancers has significantly improved with advances in computed tomography and the emergence of screening protocols. We reviewed the clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes of patients with subcentimeter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in our institution. A total of 105 patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection for subcentimeter NSCLCs were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival were analyzed statistically using Student's t-test for continuous variables, Fisher's exact for categorical variables and Cox regression for multivariable analysis. A total of 105 patients (35 male, 70 female; mean age 61.4, range 38-77 years) were analyzed. Patients underwent lobectomy (n = 71), segmentectomy (n = 19), or wedge resection (n = 15). The overall 5-year survival was 91.3%. No significant differences were observed in overall and recurrence-free survival after segmentectomy or lobectomy; patients undergoing wedge resection had shorter survival compared to those who underwent lobectomy. Elevated preoperative serum CEA levels and positive nodal status correlated with poorer survival, and were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Systematic nodal dissection is recommended for patients with subcentimeter NSCLC. Segmentectomy offers comparable oncologic results to lobectomy. Elevated preoperative serum CEA level implies shorter survival for patients with these tiny tumors.

血清CEA高値を契機に発見された虫垂粘液嚢胞腺腫の2例

血清CEA高値を契機に発見された虫垂粘液嚢胞腺腫の2例

The availability of computed tomography for pulmonary staging in colorectal cancer.

PurposeChest computed tomography is performed frequently for the preoperative pulmonary staging in colorectal cancers (CRCs) regardless of the result of chest x-ray (CXR) due to its high sensitivities and specificities. The advancement of CT technology detects more indeterminate lung lesions that may require further investigations, referrals and follow-up. The aim of this study was to suggest a guideline for performing chest CT for preoperative pulmonary staging in colorectal cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the records of patients who had chest CT preformed without the evidence of metastasis on CXR for preoperative pulmonary staging.ResultsOf 21 patients with metastatic nodules on chest CT, 23.8% showed pulmonary metastasis on positron emission tomography, 47.6% showed extrapulmonary metastasis on preoperative evaluation and 61.9% showed elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level above 10 ng/mL. These results showed significant value compared to patients without metastatic nodules. But, in analyzing patients with or without indeterminate nodules in the three contents listed above, there was no significance.ConclusionIn the patients with CRC who show normal CXR and exhibit positivity in PET, preoperative extrapulmonary metastasis and elevated serum CEA level above 10 ng/mL preoperatively, chest CT would be helpful in preoperative staging.

Combined preoperative CEA and CD44v6 improves prognostic value in patients with stage I and stage II colorectal cancer

Combination of biomarkers may improve diagnosis and have better prognostic value than single markers. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combined CEA and CD44v6 improves prognostic value in stage I and stage II (stage I/II) colorectal cancer (CRC). Preoperative serum CEA level and the expression of CD44v6 in CRC tissues were examined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The association of CEA and CD44v6 with clinicopathological features and their possible prognostic values was analyzed. The preoperative elevated serum CEA level and positive CD44v6 expression were detected in 30.1% (52/173) serum samples and 60.5% (101/167) CRC tissues, respectively. Patients with an elevated-CEA level or a CD44v6-negative tumor had a worse disease-specific survival (DSS) than those with a normal-CEA level or CD44v6-positive tumor (P=0.024, P=0.012, respectively). Moreover, CD44v6 expression could be used in discriminating patients from good to poor prognosis in normal-CEA subgroup (P=0.043), but not in elevated-CEA subgroup (P=0.563). Multivariate analysis revealed that combined CEA and CD44v6 was an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage I/II CRC (P=0.023). However, serum CEA level only retained a borderline significance for correlation with a worse DSS (P=0.059), and CD44v6 expression alone was not an independent prognostic factor for DSS in multivariate analysis (P=0.123). These results suggested that combined CEA/CD44v6 had better prognostic value than CEA or CD44v6 alone for patients with stage I/II CRC.

A nomogram based on clinical factors to predict locally advanced stage of rectal cancer.

376 Background: Preoperative staging of rectal cancer is important for designing treatment strategy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography are major staging approaches with a prediction accuracy of about 70-80% but not widely available in hospitals in China. We sought to define possible clinicopathological predictors and establish a simple nomogram as a reference tool for patients and clinicians to predict stage of rectal cancer and make decisions about neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Preoperative staging of rectal cancer is important for designing treatment strategy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasonography are major staging approaches with a prediction accuracy of about 70-80% but not widely available in hospitals in China. We sought to define possible clinicopathological predictors and establish a simple nomogram as a reference tool for patients and clinicians to predict stage of rectal cancer and make decisions about neoadjuvant therapy. Results: In the training set, 77.1% of patients had locally advanced stage by pathology. The multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size (Odds ratio (OR)=1.55, p&lt; 0.001), differentiation (OR =0.38, p&lt; 0.001), location (OR =1.06, p=0.038), serum CEA (OR =0.24, p&lt; 0.001) and CA19-9 level (OR =0.13, p&lt; 0.001) were associated with tumor stage. A nomogram consisting of these 5 factors was developed and predicted locally advanced stage with a concordance index of 0.756. The concordance index of this nomogram was 0.800 in the validation set. Conclusions: Large tumor size, far from anal verge, poor differentiation, elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 level were high-risk factors of locally advanced stage of rectal cancer. The nomogram based on these clinical factors can predicte locally advanced rectal cancer with a considerable accuracy and thus helpful for making neoadjuvant therapy recommendations.

Expression of CD7, CD20 and CDX-2 in a Secondary Signet-Ring Cell Tumor of the Prostate: A Case Report

As is well-known, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) rarely appears as a histological finding in the prostatic tissue. Nevertheless, a differentiation should be made between a primary tumor and a metastatic disease. We describe the case of a 52-year-old man with lower urinary tract symptoms, serum total PSA of 0.2 ng/ml, elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 levels. Two years prior to presentation, he underwent total gastrectomy with histological findings indicating poor differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cell. A palpable nodule was found on digital rectal examination and for this reason he underwent 12-core transperineal prostate biopsy with a diagnosis of poor differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cell and adipose tissue infiltration. Immunohistochemical examinations revealed positivity for PAS, CK7 and CDX-2, focal positivity for CK20 and negativity for PSA and PSAP. The diagnosis of a prostatic secondary SRCC was possible given the positivity to CK7, CDX-2, focal positivity to CK20 and negativity to PSA.

Factors Influencing Oncological Outcomes in Patients Who Develop Pulmonary Metastases After Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer

The prognostic factors after pulmonary resection in patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases remain controversial. The study aimed to identify the predicting factors for oncological outcomes after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer and pulmonary metastases. This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital/referral center in South Korea. Between January 2000 and June 2010, 105 patients who developed pulmonary metastases after curative resection for colorectal cancer were enrolled. Forty-eight patients underwent pulmonary resection, and the remaining 58 were given chemotherapy and/or best supportive care. The primary outcomes measured were the predictive factors of survival and recurrence. During the 35.9-month median follow-up period, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 54.6% and 30.4%. On multivariate analysis, absence of adjuvant chemotherapy after pulmonary metastases (p = 0.003), presence of extrapulmonary metastases (p = 0.001), elevated prelaparotomy serum CEA level (p = 0.015), and absence of pulmonary resection (p = 0.048) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. In patients who underwent pulmonary resection, the 3-year pulmonary recurrence-free survival rate was 78.3%. On multivariate analysis, elevated prelaparotomy serum CEA level (p = 0.018) and disease-free interval ≤ 12 months (p = 0.008) were independent risk factors associated with pulmonary re-recurrence after pulmonary resection. This study took place at a single institution and had a small sample size. Although we admit, to some degree, the benefits of the selection mechanism, pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer may improve survival after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy, extrapulmonary metastases, and prelaparotomy CEA value are independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Prelaparotomy serum CEA level may be an especially reliable predictor of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients who undergo curative resection for colorectal cancer.

術前血清CEA値が異常高値を示した盲腸癌の1例

術前血清CEA値が異常高値を示した盲腸癌の1例