Elephant Trunk For Acute Type Research Articles

Redo extended thoracic aortic replacement from aortic root to descending aorta via anterolateral thoracotomy with partial sternotomy for graft infection

A 59-year-old male underwent Bio-Bentall + total arch replacement with a frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection before at another hospital. He was diagnosed as mediastinitis and previous graft infection, followed by wound closure with omental flap installation. However, the recurrent graft infection from the aortic root to the FET in the descending aorta was diagnosed by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Redo modified Bio-Bentall procedure, total arch replacement, and descending aortic replacement for previous graft infection using anterolateral thoracotomy with partial sternotomy was successfully performed. Anterolateral thoracotomy with partial sternotomy provided not only the excellent exposure from the aortic root to the descending aorta but also sure myocardial protection with antegrade and selective delivery of cold crystalloid cardioplegia and stable brain protection with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. The patient is doing well without recurrent of infection after 2 years of the operation.

Abstract 15941: Efficacy of Frozen Elephant Trunk for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Objectives: There are various treatment strategies for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). In our department, total arch replacement (TAR) using the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) is the standard technique for DeBakey type I, which has a patent false lumen, and we assessed the outcomes and postoperative complications. Methods: Of 71 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for ATAAD at our department from October 2020 to May 2023, 42 patients were included, excluding 29 patients whose the descending aorta was thrombosed or not dissected. Results: Age 64±11 years, 30 male patients (71.4%). Preoperatively, cardiac tamponade was observed in 5 cases, malperfusion in 5 cases of head, 2 cases of coronary artery, 3 cases of celiac artery, 3 cases of superior mesenteric artery, 13 cases of renal artery, and 13 cases of lower limbs. The surgical procedures were ascending aortic replacement (AAR) in 6 cases (14.2%), partial arch replacement (PAR) in 2 cases (4.8%), TAR in 5 cases (11.9%), and TAR with FET in 29 cases (69.0%). The mean operation time was 304±70 minutes, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time 168±45 minutes, the mean cardiac arrest time 100±26 minutes, the mean circulatory arrest time 42±8 minutes, and the mean minimum bladder temperature 26.1±1.4°C. There was no hospital death, and complications included new stroke in 2 patients (4.8%). The residual dissection was AAR5/6 (83.3%), PAR1/2 (50.0%), TAR5/5 (100%), and TAR with FET24/29 (82.8%), of which AAR5/5 (100%), PAR1/1 (100%), TAR2/5 (40.0%), and TAR with FET1/24 (4.2%) had residual dissection in the proximal descending aorta. There were 3 deaths (meningitis, cerebral hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage) with a mean follow-up of 8.9±6.7 months. The only additional treatment was preemptive TEVAR in 1 case (2.4%) for residual dissection of proximal descending aorta of TAR with FET. There was no case of stent induced new entry. Conclusions: We consider the early results for ATAAD to be favorable. Furthermore, TAR with FET promotes good thrombosis and remodeling down to the proximal descending level, suggesting that FET may contribute to improved outcomes during follow-up period. Further clinical research on mid-term outcomes is needed.

Frozen Elephant Trunk for Acute Type A Dissection: Is Risk from Procedure or Patient Characteristics?

The initial goal of acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remains to get the patient off the table safely. More extensive repair is being pushed at the index operation with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) operation, but outcomes are suggested to be worse. However, we hypothesize that the risk associated with the FET in ATAAD is from the patient presenting factors rather than the operation itself. A retrospective review of a single institution prospective database from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Two cohorts were created based on the indication for FET: evidence of radiographic malperfusion (n = 44) or clinical malperfusion (n = 31). Data were analyzed for preoperative characteristics, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical univariate analysis was performed with chi-square analysis and t-tests with significance determined at an alpha level of 0.05. Preoperative characteristics were similar in each group, independent of malperfusion markers. The intraoperative characteristics were similar, except the clinical malperfusion group had more packed red blood cells and cryoprecipitate given. The clinical malperfusion group had longer intensive care unit length of stay (p < 0.001), more postoperative strokes (p < 0.001), more reoperations (p <0.0001), and higher mortality rate (p = 0.0003). These data suggest that clinical malperfusion increases the risk of major complications and death. However, full arch replacement with FET in the absence of clinical malperfusion does not appear to add risk to the operation for ATAAD. Patients with increased risk of distal degeneration should be considered for more aggressive replacement to avoid subsequent arch replacement.

Frozen elephant trunk in acute type A aortic dissection through partial upper sternotomy: Considerations for the real world setting

Frozen elephant trunk in acute type A aortic dissection through partial upper sternotomy: Considerations for the real world setting

Visceral protection in total arch replacement for aortic dissection: Effect of lower body hypothermia.

Optimal hypothermia strategy for total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is unclear. A higher temperature during circulatory arrest might reduce tolerance to ischemia for visceral organs. We sought to investigate the effect of hypothermia on visceral protection. From January 2010 to December 2019, 1138 consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Visceral organ injury and visceral-related adverse outcomes were defined as acute renal failure or spinal cord injury or both. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate linear regression model were used. The mean age of patient was 46.9 ± 10.0 years, with a male preponderance (79.6%). Operative mortality was 6.1% (69 patients). Spinal cord injury occurred in 55 (4.8%) patients and 133 (11.7%) patients had acute renal failure. In the multivariate logistic regression model, neither bladder temperature (odds ratio [OR] 0.971, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.922-1.024, p = .278) nor circulatory arrest duration (OR 1.017, 95% CI 0.987-1.047, p = .267) significantly associated with visceral-related adverse outcomes. Female, lower limb malperfusion, age, cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) duration and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors of visceral-related outcomes. There was a significant negative correlation between bladder temperature and CPB duration in multiple linear regression model (β = -3.67, p < .0001). Bladder temperature had no effect on outcomes related to visceral protection under the premise of short circulatory arrest duration, but female gender, lower limb malperfusion, age, CPB duration, and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors. Bladder temperature negatively correlated to CPB duration.

Safety and arch complications after hemiarch versus total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk in acute type 1 dissection: Is a stent graft always beneficial?

ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the efficacy of total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk by comparing it with hemiarch replacement with and without open stent graft for acute aortic dissection type 1. MethodsWe reviewed records of 177 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement (HAR group) (concomitant open stent, 125) and 98 patients who underwent total arch replacement (TAR group) (concomitant stented elephant trunk, 91) for acute type 1 dissection. Compared with the TAR group, the HAR group was older (68.1 vs 60.9 years; P < .01) and had more thrombosed false lumen (28.8% vs 4.1%, P < .01). ResultsIn-hospital death occurred for 7 patients in the HAR group and 1 patient in the TAR group (P = .17). More patients in the TAR group had a postoperative thrombosed false lumen, compared with the HAR group (68% vs 54%, P = .03). In patients with preoperative nonthrombosed false lumen in the HAR group, the rate of postoperative thrombosis was significantly lower than with versus without an open stent (31% vs 65%, P = .01). The rate of freedom from an aortic arch event in the TAR group at 5 years was significantly greater than that in the HAR group (100% vs 83.7%, P = .01). ConclusionsStented elephant trunk with TAR provided a high rate of false lumen thrombosis and a low incidence of arch events, whereas an open stent during HAR was not beneficial in terms of false lumen thrombosis and arch event prevention.

Comparison of Single Axillary vs. Dual Arterial Cannulation for Acute Type a Aortic Dissection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundThe optimal arterial cannulation site for acute aortic dissection repair is unclear, especially for complex arch surgery. Axillary artery cannulation is widely accepted but adding femoral artery cannulation to it was considered to potentially improve perfusion and early outcomes. To clarify this point, a comparison of perioperative outcomes for these two different cannulation strategies was conducted regarding the pathological features of dissection.MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2019, 927 consecutive patients underwent a total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data, including detailed pathological features, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for adjusting confounders that are potentially related to the outcome.ResultsA total of 523 patients (56.3%) accepted a dual arterial cannulation (DAC group), and 406 patients (43.7%) received a single axillary artery cannulation (SAC group). In total, 388 pairs of patients were well-matched. Whether before or after adjusting the preoperative characteristics by matching, there were no significant differences in operative mortality (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.4%, P = 1 after matching), stroke (6.7 vs. 5.4%, P = 0.420 before matching; 6.4 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.435 after matching), spinal cord injury (5 vs. 5.7%, P = 0.640 before matching; 5.4 vs. 5.7%, P = 1. After matching), and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (13.8 vs. 9.6%, P =0.050 before matching; 12.6 vs. 9.5%, P = 0.174) between the two groups. Dual arterial cannulation was not an independent protective factor of operative mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.86), stroke (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), spinal cord injury (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65–2.11), and acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.78–1.97) after adjusting for confounding factors by multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the subgroup analysis, no advantage of dual arterial cannulation was found for a particular population.ConclusionsSingle axillary artery cannulation was competent in the complex arch repair for acute aortic dissection, presenting with a satisfactory result as dual arterial cannulation. Adding femoral artery cannulation was necessary when a sufficient flow volume could not be achieved by axillary artery cannulation or when a lower limb malperfusion existed.

Frozen elephant trunk in acute type A aortic dissections: frontiers and challenges.

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), a surgical emergency, has high mortality and morbidity. More than half of the patients die within 2weeks and the 30-day mortality is 90%. Frozen elephant trunk in ATAAD addresses the primary and secondary goals - resection of the primary tear in the ascending aorta and promoting remodelling in the downstream aorta. Though the literature supports this fact, in reality these literatures emerge from high-volume centres. But in the "real world" most of the ATAAD are operated on in the low-volume centres. Furthermore, in India, there are unique challenges including the financial burden, transport, emergent availability of the hybrid prosthesis and aortic supercentres.

A Case of Paraplegia after Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

A Case of Paraplegia after Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Total Aortic Arch Replacements With a 4 Branched Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) Graft in Acute Aortic Dissection (DeBakey type I)

Total Aortic Arch Replacements With a 4 Branched Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) Graft in Acute Aortic Dissection (DeBakey type I)

"Branch-First total arch replacement": a valuable alternative to frozen elephant trunk in acute type A aortic dissection?

The "Branch-First total arch replacement" technique has been used extensively in both elective and acute situations, including in type A aortic dissection. The focus of the Branch-First technique is to reduce the risk of neurological and end-organ dysfunction associated with arch replacement by optimising neuroprotection, distal organ perfusion and myocardial protection. The Branch-First technique is a valuable alternative to the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique in type A aortic dissection, providing a stable landing zone for subsequent interventions on the distal aorta should they be required. Combining the Branch-First technique with FET in appropriate cases can further improve outcomes. We discuss the merits of the Branch-First technique, and contrast them to those of FET techniques for repair of type A aortic dissection.

Hypothermic circulatory arrest time affects neurological outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The treatment of complex thoracic aorta pathologies remains a challenge for cardiovascular surgeons. After introducing Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET), a significant evolution of surgical techniques has been achieved. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of FET in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and the effect of circulatory arrest time on post-operative neurologic outcomes. A standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted for all observational studies of patients diagnosed with ATAAD undergoing total arch replacement with FET reporting in-hospital mortality, bleeding, and neurological outcomes. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (StataCorp, TX, USA). Thirty-five studies were eligible for the present meta-analysis, including 3211 patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement with FET. The pooled estimate for in-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and spinal cord injury were 7% (95% CI 5 - 9; I2 = 68.65%), 5% (95% CI 4 - 7; I2 = 63.93%), and 3% (95% CI 2 - 4; I2 = 19.56%), respectively. Univariate meta-regression revealed that with increasing the duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest time, the effect sizes for postoperative stroke and SCI enhances. It seems that employing the FET procedure for acute type A dissection is associated with acceptable neurologic outcomes and a similar mortality rate comparing with other aorta pathologies. Besides, increasing hypothermic circulation arrest time appears to be a significant predictor of adverse neurologic outcomes after FET.

Total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of total aortic arch replacement with proximalization of distal anastomosis using the frozen elephant trunk technique with the J Graft FROZENIX (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan) and Gelweave Lupiae (Vascutek Terumo Inc, Scotland, United Kingdom) graft (distal anastomosis performed in zones 1 and 2) in patients with acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. MethodsA total of 50 patients underwent total aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique, deploying the J Graft FROZENIX into zone 1 or 2 (zone 1: n = 17, zone 2: n = 33) in combination with the Gelweave Lupiae graft for acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. Patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and early and midterm outcomes were analyzed. ResultsThe overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4% (2 patients). The in-hospital mortality rate in patients with visceral malperfusion was 11% (1/9). There were no patients with paraplegia and stent graft–induced new entry. Resection or closure of the most proximal entry tear was achieved in 100% of 42 patients who had postoperative computed tomography. The overall survival was 87.9%, 84.1%, and 84.1% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. However, 1 patient required endovascular extension for the dilatation of the descending thoracic aorta 4 months after the initial surgery. ConclusionsTotal aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique (zone 1-2) and Gelweave Lupiae graft was safe and effective in simplifying surgery for acute Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

Alternatives to the frozen elephant trunk in acute type A aortic dissection.

Acute type A aortic dissection remains one of the most challenging condition in cardiothoracic surgery, with a high mortality rate. Various improvements and innovations have happened over the years to better the outcome of this lethal condition. The frozen elephant trunk prosthesis has been developed to negate the long-term complications of acute type A aortic dissection, but at the cost of increased morbidity compared to hemiarch replacement. Although hemiarch and total arch replacement seem have less morbidity than the frozen elephant trunk technique, they do not address the long-term complications of the distal dissected aorta. Few surgeons now suggest hybrid aortic arch repair as a solution for acute type A aortic dissection. The long-term results need to be studied in all procedures before standardizing them. Although multiple strategies are evolving, the short-term goal of acute type A aortic dissection has not changed: to save the patient's life. The surgical strategy has to be tailored according to the patient's condition and the surgeon's experience.

Early and mid-term outcome of frozen elephant trunk using spinal cord protective perfusion strategy for acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of spinal cord injury in total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection using our spinal cord protection technique.MethodsBetween January 2013 and December 2017, 33 patients underwent total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection (mean age 67.9 ± 13.3 years). Our spinal cord protection technique involved maintaining extracorporeal circulation through the left subclavian artery in all procedures, using aortic occlusion balloon during distal anastomosis, and inserting frozen elephant trunk above Th 8 with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Computed tomography was performed within 1–2 weeks, 12 months, and 36 months postoperatively. We compared the degree of thrombosis of the descending aorta between preoperation and early postoperative period by Fisher’s exact test. Moreover, we evaluated postoperative mortality and mobility (including spinal cord injury) at follow-up.ResultsThe operative mortality within 30 days was 6.1%. Neither paraplegia nor paraparesis was noted. We observed significant thrombosis of the false lumen at the distal arch and aortic valve level of the descending aorta in postoperative early term period (p < 0.01). At mid-term follow-up (mean 33.9 months), survival probability and 3-year freedom from reoperation rates were 93.9 ± 4.1% and 95.0 ± 4.9%, respectively.ConclusionsThe frozen elephant trunk technique with our spinal protection strategy provides good postoperative outcomes. Our strategy can maintain spinal cord perfusion without complete ischemia time even during lower body ischemia time. Implementation of our spinal protection strategy will help prevent spinal cord injury and dilated downstream aorta.

David reimplantation with simultaneous total arch replacement and stented elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectivesTo compare early and mid-term outcomes between David reimplantation and the Bentall procedure with simultaneous total arch replacement (TAR) and stented elephant trunk (SET) implantation in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). MethodsFrom January 2012 to June 2018, 148 patients underwent aortic root replacement combined with TAR and SET for ATAAD. Patients were evaluated retrospectively and categorized into David reimplantation (n = 55) and Bentall procedure (n = 93) groups. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare in-hospital and follow-up adverse events between the 2 groups. ResultsIn-hospital mortality and the incidence of major perioperative complications were comparable between the 2 groups (all P > .05). No significant difference in mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and circulatory arrest time was found between the 2 groups, although mean crossclamp time was longer in the David group (P = .02). During a follow-up period of 2.6 (interquartile range, 1.5-4.3) years, the Bentall group experienced rates of paravalvular leakage and prosthetic valve endocarditis of 2.3% and 2.3%, respectively, whereas the David group experienced rates of infective endocarditis and recurrent moderate aortic regurgitation of 1.9% and 1.9%, respectively. The overall survival was 82.9% for the David group and 89.2% for the Bentall group (P = .63), whereas the incidence of major cardiovascular-related events was 21.3% and 17.3% (P = .30) 5 years postoperatively. ConclusionsFor Chinese patients undergoing ATAAD, David reimplantation provided similar outcomes compared with the Bentall procedure, with simultaneous TAR and SET. David reimplantation is an appealing option for patients who suffer root ectasia or extensive sinus damage albeit normal leaflets.

Aortic balloon occlusion technique versus moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion in total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection

BackgroundModerate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) with antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) is safe and efficient in total arch replacement (TAR) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Complications related to hypothermia and ischemia are inevitable, however. The aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique is performed to elevate the lowest nasopharyngeal temperature to 28°C and shorten the circulatory arrest time. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this new technique. MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of patients with ATAAD who underwent TAR and FET, including 79 who underwent ABO and 109 who underwent MHCA/ACP. ResultsCirculatory arrest time was significantly lower in the ABO group compared with the MHCA/ACP group (mean, 4.8 ± 1.2 minutes vs 18.4 ± 3.1 minutes; P < .001). The composite endpoint was comparable in the 2 groups (11.4% for ABO vs 13.8% for MHCA/ACP; P = .631). Fewer patients in the ABO group developed high-grade acute kidney injury (AKI) according to a modified RIFLE criterion (22.8% vs 36.7%; P = .041), and the rate of hepatic dysfunction was lower in the ABO group (11.4% vs 28.4%; P = .005). Multivariable logistic analysis showed that the ABO technique is protective against duration of ventilation >24 hours (odds ratio [OR], 0.455; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.234-0.887; P = .021), hepatic dysfunction (OR, 0.218; 95% CI, 0.084-0.561; P = .002), and grade II-III AKI (OR, 0.432; 95% CI, 0.204-0.915; P = .028). ConclusionsThe ABO technique significantly shortens the circulatory arrest time in TAR and FET. Available clinical data suggest that it has a certain protective effect on the liver and kidney. Future large-sample studies are warranted to thoroughly evaluate this new technique.

Frozen elephant trunk does not increase incidence of paraplegia in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveWe seek to assess the safety of total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection in respect to the risks of operative mortality, stroke, and paraplegia using an international multicenter registry (ARCH). MethodsThe ARCH Registry database from 37 participating centers was analyzed between 2000 and 2015. Patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection treated by total arch replacement with or without frozen elephant trunk were included. Operative mortality, permanent neurologic deficits, and spinal cord injury were primary end points. These end points were analyzed using univariate and hierarchical multivariate regression analyses, as well as conditional logistic regression analysis and post hoc propensity-score stratification. ResultsA total of 11,928 patients were enrolled in the ARCH database, of which 6180 were managed with total arch replacement. A comprehensive analysis was performed for 978 patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection with or without frozen elephant trunk placement. In propensity-score matching, there were no significant differences between total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk in terms of permanent neurologic deficits (11.9% vs 10.1%, P = .59) and spinal cord injury (4.0% vs 6.3%, P = .52) For patients included in the post hoc propensity-score stratification, frozen elephant trunk was associated with a statistically significantly lower mortality risk (odds ratio, 0.47; P = .03). ConclusionsThe use of frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection does not appear to increase the risk of paraplegia in appropriately selected patients at experienced centers. The exact risk factors for paraplegia remain to be determined.

Single Low-Volume Center Experience with Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Type A Aortic Dissections.

Background Acute Type A aortic dissection (AAAD) is a surgical emergency. In patients with arch and descending aorta involvement (DeBakey Type I), a total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) could favor false lumen thrombosis and improve long-term results. The authors hereby present their experience with this technique in a single low-volume center, to assess whether the technique is feasible to treat such disease. Methods From January 2011 to December 2016, 43 patients with AAAD were operated on in the authors' institution, which carries out 300 to 350 annual procedures. Among these, 12 patients with an intimal tear in the aortic arch and/or proximal descending aorta received a FET procedure (10 males, age 57 years). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement (42%), Bentall (25%), and aortic valve repair (17%). Results Cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac arrest, and circulatory arrest times were 235 ± 43, 171 ± 33, and 75 ± 20 minutes, respectively. The operative mortality was 16.7% ( n = 2). Stroke and re-thoracotomy for bleeding occurred in 8% ( n = 1) and 8% ( n = 1), respectively. There was no spinal cord injury. Follow-up was 36.1 months. During follow-up, no patients died or required a reoperation on the downstream aorta. Conclusion Although all patients were operated on in a low-volume center, the results with FET in AAAD are acceptable. Even though this technique demands high technical skills, it is a promising approach in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Frozen Elephant Trunk for Acute Type B Dissection Involving the Distal Arch in the Hybrid Repair Era

Hybrid repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) with aortic arch involvement is associated with a high rate of endoleak, stroke, and retrograde aortic dissection. Optimal management of this lesion remains uncertain. In this hybrid repair era, surgical results of ATBAD with distal aortic arch involvement using a frozen elephant trunk procedure with transposition of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) to left common carotid artery (LCCA) is reported. From April 2011 to April 2016, 53 patients with complicated ATBAD with distal aortic arch involvement underwent a frozen elephant trunk procedure with LSCA-LCCA transposition. Preoperative organ malperfusion included renal ischemia in 10 subjects, renal infarction in 2, lower limb ischemia in 6, and visceral ischemia in5. There was no inhospital death. Continuous renal replacement therapy was required in 1 patient. Permanent neurologic injury was observed in 1 patient and temporary neurologic dysfunction in 1 patient. Ischemia of the lower limb and viscera was ameliorated after frozen elephant trunk implantation. During follow-up, thoracoabdominal aortic replacement was required in 1 patient, and the Wheat procedure in 1 other patient. The patency rate of the anastomotic sitebetween the LSCA and LCCA was 100%, and shrinkage of the descending aorta occurred in 90.4% of patients (47 of 52) as demonstrated by computed tomography. Open repair of ATBAD with distal aortic arch involvement using the frozen elephant trunk procedure with LSCA-LCCA transposition obtained satisfactory outcomes. Avoidance of complications using hybrid repair, good postoperative recovery, and a low prevalence of late reintervention were achieved. The satisfactory results favored this technique for this lesion in this hybrid repair era.