Elements Of Group Dynamics Research Articles

Dinamika Kelompok Usaha Bersama “Mina Jaya” di Desa Puger Kulon, Kecamatan Puger, Kabupaten Jember

A group can be considered to be developing if it is capable to make improvements in responding to changes that occur within the group itself, such as the phenomenon that occurred in Mina Jaya Joint Business Group (KUB) in Puger Kulon Village, Puger Sub-district, Jember Regency. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the Mina Jaya KUB group. The study used a qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation. Research informants were selected using the purposive method. The analysis used the Miles & Huberman analysis model. The results of the study indicate that the dynamics of Mina Jaya KUB are considered dynamic based on the elements of group dynamics. The group’s objectives are to serve as a platform for the learning process, a venue for cooperation, an organization for joint activities, and self-reliance. The group members were able to explain and understand the group’s objectives, making the objectives effective. The group’s structure consists of a chairman, secretary, treasurer, supervisor, members, and advisor. Each role has been carried out according to the group’s task functions, including coordination, providing information, taking initiatives, ensuring member satisfaction, explaining, and disseminating information. The group regularly conducts monitoring and evaluation at each meeting and makes efforts to increase participation by fostering communication and providing rewards. Group members do not have specific intentions for their participation in the group.

Dinamika Anggota Kelompok Tani Matuari di Kelurahan Paniki Bawah Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado

The Matuari Farmer Group is a farmer group in Paniki Bawah Village, Mapanget District, Manado City, North Sulawesi Province, and is included in the intermediate level farmer group. This farmer group was founded by Mrs. Johana Lumanaw in 2015, until now it has been 8 years old consisting of women farmers consisting of 10 active farmer group members including the chairman, secretary, treasurer and members. The land area in the Matuari Farmer Group is 1 Ha. This study aims to determine the Dynamics of Matuari Farmer Group Members in Paniki Bawah Village, Mapanget District, Manado City, which is studied from elements of group dynamics. This research was carried out for three months, from May to July 2023 in Paniki Bawah Village, Mapanget District, Manado City. Data analysis applied in this study used qualitative descriptive analysis and Likert scale. The sampling method is Purposive Sampling. The research data collected are primary data and secondary data. The results of the research that became the purpose of conducting the Matuari Farmer Group Member Dynamics research in Paniki Bawah Village, Mapanget District, Manado City were Dynamic by obtaining a total overall score of 920 with a percentage of 92.92%.

DINAMIKA KELOMPOK TANI DI DESA NETPALA KECAMATAN MOLLO UTARA KABUPATEN TIMOR TENGAH SELATAN

This study aims to find out : (1) the dynamics of farmer groups in Netpala Village, North Mollo District, South Central Timor District, (2) the constraints faced by farmer group members in applying the dynamics of farmer group elements in Netpala Village, North Mollo Subdistrict South Central Timor District.
 
 The research method used is a survey method. The location of the sample was determined by purposive sampling in the village of Netpala. The research population is all farmers who are members of farmer groups in Netpala Village, and the sample of farmer was taken proportionate random sampling from 110 farmers from five farmer groups, therefor obtained 52 farmers. The analysis used in this study was a qualitative descriptive analysis and a Likert scale.
 
 The results showed the majority of respondents in productive age were 46 (88.46%) of formal education was low 22 (44.23%), non-formal education was classified as high where there were 44 (84.61%). The average dynamics level of the eight elements of farmer group dynamics in the Netpala village is dynamic (69%), the dynamics level of group goals is quite dynamic (62%), group structure is dynamic (88%), the structure of task functions is dynamic (100%) %), the structure of group development and group development is dynamic (67%), the compact group structure is dynamic (85%), the structure of the group atmosphere has the same score (50%), the pressure structure of the group is quite dynamic (44%), the structure group effectiveness is classified as dynamic (100%). Constraints faced with the eight elements of group dynamics, group goals (61%), group structure (11%), coaching and group development (30%), group cohesiveness (15%), group atmosphere (50%), group pressure (55%), group effectiveness (0%) or no feedback.

Factors Affecting Dynamics of Fish Processing Group in Cirebon Regency

Traditional processing of fish has a variety of problems. Various problems can be solved through the group on the condition that the group is dynamic. The more dynamic groups make it easier to achieve group goals. This study aims to identify the dynamics of fish processing groups in Kabupaten Cirebon and to analyze factors influencing group dynamics. The research approach is quantitative by survey method and using questionnaire as data gathering tool. The sample in this research is the fish processing which is in twelve groups of fish processing from three districs in Cirebon Regency with the number of samples are 78 fish processor. The data were gathered April 2018. Data were analysed using Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 24 for descriptive and Partial Least Square (PLS) 3 for inferential statistic. The results showed that the dynamics of the fish processing group in Cirebon Regency are in the high category. From the eight elements of group dynamics there is only one that is in the low category, that is pressure. So, groups are active in interacting to achieve group goals. Group dynamics are influenced significantly and positively by internal and external factors. Internal factors that affect group dynamics are cosmopolitan, long become members and group motivation. External factors that influence group dynamics are the availability of information, the role of extension worker, the role of government and the availability of raw materials. Group dynamics are reflected by structure, coaching and development, atmosphere and effectiveness.

Hubungan Karakteristik Komunikasi Petani dengan Tingkat Kedinamisan Kelompok Petani

The success of agricultural development is closely connected with the extent of innovation information received by farmers either individuals or groups. Farmer groups be an entry point in the diffusion of innovation by farmers. Approaches to see how far the effectiveness of the group is through a group dynamics approach. The research method used explanatory research, research that explains the relationship between variables through hypothesis testing. The research proves that all communication characteristics significantly associated with the level of the dynamics of the group. The higher the social participation, the more intense the communication, the higher the height of media access and participation in education, the more dynamic is also a group. Elements of group dynamics that purpose, structure and function, atmosphere, coaching and effectiveness significantly associated with all the communication variables. Pressure group only related to social participation and intensity of communication. Only cohesiveness of the group that did not have anything to do with the characteristics of the group

Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Dinamika Kelompok dan Hubungannya dengan Kelas Kemampuan Kelompok Tani di Desa Pulokencana Kabupaten Serang

<p>Group dynamics is an important factor in the development offarmers' groups. The aims of this study is to know the differences between of farmer group dynamics which includes highest class with lowest class. The results showed that there was no relationship between class ability of farmer groups with the level of group dynamics. Capability class of farmers group evaluation which undertaken in the village Pulokencana only based on an assessment of the head of farmers group and age of group only.The fact that Banjar Tani group is more dynamic than the Banyu Mukti group, but the class between that two groups very different, Banyu Mukti is Main class while the Banjar Tani is Beginners class. Factors that affect the group dynamics are land area, family size, age of group leader and age of farmer groups, and the reception of members of the group leader. In addition, the eight elements of group dynamics, only two elements that do not affect the group dynamics, namely the element of group objective and group pressure. Meanwhile, the six elements that influence group dynamics, the task function has the strongest influence on the dynamics of farmer groups.</p><p>Keywords: farmer group, group dynamics</p>

PEMBERDAYAAN PETANI SAYURAN: KASUS PETANI SAYURAN DI SULAWESI SELATAN

This study was focused on analyzing farmers’ empowerment and studying factors affecting group dynamic in relation with their business improvement. The objectives of this study were: (1) to identify factors that influence empowerment of crop farmer within groups, (2) the relation between group dynamics and productivity and, (3) the formulation of empowerment strategy through group approach. This study was conducted at two districts area: Gowa and Enrekang at South Sulawesi Province. Primary data were obtained from 240 respondents from members of group farmer who their business mostly cultivate vegetable. Quantitative analysis and qualitative-descriptive analysis were employed to explain the result of the research. Variabels used in the study were individual characteristics. The level of farmer empowerment within group is low, and factors that affect farmers’ empowerment within group are low (underdeveloped). These factors are empowerment pattern, level of personality, social environment, information access and level of farmers’ productivity. Development of elements of group dynamics in two locations shows low performance that means underdeveloped. The main constraints for developing group dynamics are lack of initiative and participation of group members to encourage group activities, and lack of cooperation and coordination of tasks within group. Individual characteristics include level of formal education, empowerment pattern, farmers’ personality, social environment and information access show significantly positive relationship with group dynamic. There are fourteen variabels which positively influence group dynamics. These variabels are empowerment pattern; level of farmers’ personality; social environment; and information access. Based on the relationship among variabels in the model of farmer development toward farmer’s productivity, it shows that variabels of working network (X2.2), self confident (X3.2), culture norms (X4.1), accurate information (X5.2), group objective (Y1.1) and group development (Y1.3) affect significantly of farmers’ productivity. This means these variables have significant role in promoting farmers’ productivity. Farmers’ productivity is still low and it should be developed through more diynamic activities.