Abstract Interest in the assessment of Central Blood Pressure (cBP) is steadily growing since it is a better predictor of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death than Peripheral Blood Pressure (pBP). However, pBP remains the first line for the diagnosis of hypertension (HTN) due to the ease and speed of the measurement. We sought to validate a new method to estimate cBP from brachial sphygmomanometer measurements. We estimated cBP using a sphygmomanometer that can record, after conventional pBP measurements, the pressure in the cuff maintained at a constant suprasystolic pressure. cBP is calculated using a method based on applying a physics-based model of the left subclavian artery to the brachial arterial branch to the suprasystolic brachial artery pressure waveforms. We compared this noninvasive estimated cBP to an invasive gold-standard measurement during cardiac catheterization. After clinically indicated cardiac catheterization requiring a haemodynamic assessment of a moderate coronary artery stenosis by Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), the wire that incorporates a high fidelity electronic pressure transducer was positioned into the guiding catheter left in the ascending aorta. Simultaneous measurements were performed with a cuff placed on the patient's left arm. The output signals were recorded in a custom-based acquisition system. The comparison was obtained on the same 10 seconds recorded by the cuff and the pressure wire. The goal will be to reach 85 patients as recommended by the ARTERY Society Task Force. It recommends as an accuracy criterion to achieve a mean difference ≤ 5 mmHg with a standard deviation (SD) ≤ 8 mmHg, which are the standards adopted for this study. Patients with aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation, or frequent (supra)ventricular extrasystoles were excluded. A total of 197 pairs of measured-estimated cBP were analysed in 78 patients with a mean age of 63 ± 8 yo, 75% of whom were men, 70% had hypertension, 26% fdiabetes, 93% dyslipidemia, 41% were tobacco users and 14% suffered from clinical peripheral artery diseases without history of revascularization. The median (InterQuartiles 25-75%) pBP was 123 [112 134] / 70 [64 77] mmHg. Measured cBP was 102 [92 11] / 78 [70 84] mmHg with a central augmentation index of 34 [23 44] %. The mean difference between estimated and measured systolic cBP was 4.9 ± 6.5 mmHg, while it was -3.9 ± 5.8 mmHg for diastolic cBP, meeting the prespecified accuracy criteria. In conclusion, our approach based on an exact matching and comparison of non-invasive suprasystolic arm cuff measurements and high-fidelity aortic BP validates that an estimation of central aortic blood pressure that can be easily carried out in daily practice and might improve HTN management. It remains to be demonstrated that more cardiovascular complications will be avoided by guiding the antihypertensive therapy with cBP instead of pBP measurements.Bland-Altman of estimated - measured cBP