Elective Spine Surgery Research Articles

Polypharmacy in elective lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions with 24-month follow-up

We sought to identify long-term associations of medical complications and healthcare utilization related to polypharmacy following spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology. The IBM MarketScan dataset was used to select patients who underwent spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology with 2-year follow-up. Regression analysis compared two matched cohorts: those with and without polypharmacy. Of 118,434 surgical patients, 68.1% met criteria for polypharmacy. In the first 30 days after discharge, surgical site infection was observed in 6% of those with polypharmacy and 4% of those without polypharmacy (p < 0.0001) and at least one complication was observed in 24% for the polypharmacy group and 17% for the non-polypharmacy group (p < 0.0001). At 24 months, patients with polypharmacy were more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia (48% vs. 37%), urinary tract infection (26% vs. 19%), and surgical site infection (12% vs. 7%), (p < 0.0001). The most prescribed medication was hydrocodone (60% of patients) and more than 95% received opioids. Two years postoperatively, the polypharmacy group had tripled overall healthcare utilization payments ($30,288 vs. $9514), (p < 0.0001). Patients taking 5 or more medications concurrently after spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions were more likely to develop medical complications, higher costs, and return to the emergency department.

Cerebrovascular pulsatility indicates preoperative subcortical cognitive impairment and an increased risk for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Advances in spine surgery enable safe interventions in elderly patients, but perioperative neurocognitive disorders (pNCD), such as post-operative delirium (POD) and cognitive dysfunction (POCD), remain a serious concern. Pre-operative cognitive impairment is a major risk factor for pNCD. Comprehensive pre-operative cognitive assessments are not feasible in clinical practice, making effective screening methods desirable. This study investigates whether pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess subcortical (vascular) cognitive impairment and the risk for POD. This prospective single-center study recruited patients aged ≥60 years scheduled for elective spine surgery at a German university hospital. Patients underwent pre-operative assessments including cognitive abilities (CERAD test battery), structural MRI, and cerebrovascular duplex sonography. POD screening was conducted three times daily for at least 3 days. The primary hypothesis, that the mean pulsatility index (PI) of both internal carotid arteries (ICA) predicts POD risk, was tested using logistic regression. Secondary analyses examined the association between POD risk and ICA flow (time-averaged peak velocities, TAPV) and correlations with cognitive profiles and MRI characteristics. POD occurred in 22% of patients (n = 22/99) within three postoperative days. Patients with POD were significantly older (75.9 ± 5.4 vs. 70.0 ± 6.9 years, p < 0.01) but did not differ by gender (p = 0.51). ICA PI significantly predicted POD risk (OR = 5.46 [95%CI: 1.81-16.49], p = 0.003), which remained significant after adjustment for age and duration of surgery (ORadj = 6.38 [95% CI: 1.77-23.03], p = 0.005). TAPV did not inform the POD risk (p = 0.68). ICA PI Pre-operative cognitive scores were significantly associated with ICA PI (mean CERAD score: r = -0.32, p < 0.001). ICA PI was also significantly associated with total white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.19, p = 0.012) and periventricular white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.21, p = 0.007). This is the first study to demonstrate that cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess the risk for POD in elderly spine surgery patients. Increased ICA PI may indicate subcortical impairment, larger white matter lesion load, and lower white matter volume, predisposing factors for POD. Pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography of the ICA is widely available, easy-to-use, and efficient, offering a promising screening method for POD risk. Increased ICA PI could supplement established predictors like age to adjust surgical and peri-operative procedures to individual risk profiles.

A Bone Health Optimization Framework for Malaysia: a position paper by the Malaysian Bone Health Optimization Network (MyBONe).

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are highly prevalent among older patients scheduled for elective arthroplasties and spinal surgeries. This position paper aims to establish, promote, and standardise effective Bone Health Optimization (BHO) strategies for such patients within orthopaedic practices in Malaysia. It emphasises the need for bone health assessments to be undertaken at the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative stages, with tailored management strategies to meet individual patient needs. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on articles published from 2019 to 2024. Twelve broad themes were defined including definitions and importance of BHO, epidemiological data, assessment techniques, risk stratification, management strategies, and outcome metrics. Elective surgeries on patients with poor bone health are associated with adverse outcomes, such as periprosthetic fractures, aseptic loosening of implants, and complications after spinal surgeries. This position paper advocates for routine bone health assessments and monitoring during the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative phases. It provides summaries of imaging modalities, risk assessment tools, and techniques for each phase. By adapting the successful "5IQ" approach from secondary fracture prevention, we propose 5IQ-based Clinical Standards for BHO, including 18 Key Performance Indicators. A Malaysian BHO Registry is proposed to benchmark care in real-time and support a national quality improvement programme. Practical resources, such as a BHO algorithm and key practice points, are included. This position paper proposes a paradigm shift in the management of bone health for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in Malaysia, aiming to improve surgical outcomes and patient care through standardised BHO strategies.

Comparative Efficacy of Intraoperative Patient State Index vs. Bi-Spectral Index in Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery with Neuromonitoring Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Various electroencephalogram-based monitors have been introduced to objectively quantify anaesthesia depth. However, limited data are available on their comparative clinical efficacy in various surgical procedures. Therefore, we planned this study to compare the relative efficacy of patient state index (PSI) vs. Bi-spectral index (BIS) assessment in patients undergoing elective spine surgery under general anaesthesia. This prospective, parallel-group, single-center study included patients undergoing major spine surgery with neuromonitoring. Patients were randomized into two groups, i.e., group B (undergoing surgery under BIS monitoring) and group P (undergoing surgery under PSI monitoring). The primary objective was to compare the time to eye opening after stopping anaesthetic drug infusions. The mean propofol dose required for induction in group B was 130.45±26.579, whereas that in group P, it was 139.28±17.86 (P value 0.085). The maintenance doses of propofol and fentanyl required for surgery were also comparable between the groups. Time to eye opening was 12.2±4.973 in group B and 12.93±4.19 in group P, with a P value of 0.2664 (U-statistic-684.50). The intraoperative PSI and BIS had similar clinical efficacy in terms of the dose of propofol required for induction, time of induction, maintenance dose of propofol and fentanyl, time of eye opening, and recovery profile in patients undergoing elective spine surgery under neuromonitoring.

One Year Patient Reported Outcomes After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion at Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Compared to Tertiary Referral Center

Lumbar spinal fusion is an increasingly common operation to treat symptoms related to degenerative disorders of the spine including radiculopathy and pain. As the volume of spine surgeries grows, it is becoming increasingly common for procedures to take place in non-tertiary care centers, including orthopaedic specialty hospitals (OSH). While previous research demonstrates that surgical outcomes at an OSH are non-inferior to those at a tertiary referral center (TRC), the implications of this difference on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been sufficiently assessed. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine if changes in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery differ between patients who undergo surgery at an orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and those who undergo surgery at a tertiary referral center (TRC) and (2) to characterize differences in short-term outcomes between hospitals. Retrospective cohort study. Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent primary, elective single-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion between January 2014 and December 2021 at a tertiary referral center or an orthopaedic specialty hospital. PROMs: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-form 12 (SF12) Mental Component Summary (MCS); SF12 Physical Component Summary (PCS); Visual Analogue Back and Leg (VAS Back/Leg) METHODS: PROMs were collected preoperatively, 6 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. Six-month and 1-year delta PROM values were calculated by subtracting the preoperative PROM score from the 6-month or 1-year score, respectively. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the independent effect of hospital location on postoperative PROM scores. A total of 288 patients were identified as part of the study cohort including 205 patients who underwent surgery at the tertiary hospital and 83 patients who underwent surgery at the OSH. OSH patients had shorter length of stay (1.57 ± 0.72 vs. 3.28 ± 1.32, p<0.001), however there was no difference in discharge disposition or 90-day readmission rates between hospitals (p>0.05). At 6 months, having surgery at the specialty hospital was associated with higher PCS (estimate = 2.96, confidence interval: 0.21 - 5.71, p=0.035). At 1-year postoperatively, the location of surgery no longer demonstrated significant associations with PROM scores. Preoperative PROM scores demonstrated significant associations with 6-month and 1-year scores for each PROM (p<0.05) except VAS leg at 6 months postoperatively. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies investigating PROMs at OSH versus TRCs for single-level lumbar fusions. We demonstrated that at one-year follow-up, there is not a significant difference in PROM improvement between patients who undergo surgery at a TRC and patients who do so at an OSH.

The hidden risk: Intracranial hemorrhage following durotomies in spine surgery

ObjectiveIntracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after durotomy in elective spine surgery, though rare, can pose a significant risk to patient outcomes. Spine surgeries bear a risk of dural tears (DT) with potential of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (PCSFL). Excessive PCSFL can precipitate a decrease in intracranial pressure, potentially leading to ICH. Literature on ICH as a postoperative complication is scarce. The aim was to assess the incidence and risk factors of ICH in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. MethodsUtilizing the 2020 National Impatient Sample (NIS) adults (>18 years) were selected by primary procedure category codes for spine fusion, discectomy, spinal cord decompression and cervicothoracic/lumbosacral nerve decompression. Exclusion criteria were trauma and malignancy. The primary outcome was occurrence of ICH. Comparative analysis and a multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent risk. ResultsIn total, 40,990 patients met our criteria with an incidence of ICH at 0.08%. The ICH-group showed an increased length of stay and higher mortality compared to the control group. Spinal cord decompression, DT and PCSFL were significantly more frequent in patients with ICH. Alcohol, drug abuse and hypertension were significantly more prevalent in patients with ICH. DT, alcohol abuse and hypertension were independent risk factors for ICH. ConclusionsThis study underscores the rarity and severity of ICHs following elective spine surgery, emphasizing awareness and looking for possible preventive measures. Our finding suggests that DT, as a complication of surgical techniques, as well as alcohol abuse and hypertension are significant predictors of ICH.

Construction and verification of a machine learning-based prediction model of deep vein thrombosis formation after spinal surgery

BackgroundDeep vein thromboembolism (DVT) is a common postoperative complication with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, the safety and effectiveness of using prophylactic anticoagulants for preventing DVT after spinal surgery remain controversial. Hence, it is crucial to predict whether DVT occurs in advance following spinal surgery. The present study aimed to establish a machine learning (ML)-based prediction model of DVT formation following spinal surgery. MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent elective spinal surgery at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (TAHZMU) from January 2020 to December 2022. We ultimately selected the clinical data of 500 patients who met the criteria for elective spinal surgery. The Boruta-SHAP algorithm was used for feature selection, and the SMOTE algorithm was used for data balance. The related risk factors for DVT after spinal surgery were screened and analyzed. Five ML algorithm models were established. The data of 150 patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (AHZMU) from July 2023 to October 2023 were used for external verification of the model. The area under the curve (AUC), geometric mean (G-mean), sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and F1 score were used to evaluate the performance of the models. ResultsThe results revealed that activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative serum creatinine (Crea), anesthesia time, rocuronium dose, and propofol dose were the seven important characteristic variables for predicting DVT after spinal surgery. Among the five ML models established in this study, the random forest classifier (RF) showed superior performance to the other models in the internal validation set. ConclusionSeven preoperative and intraoperative variables were included in our study to develop an ML-based predictive model for DVT formation following spinal surgery, and this model can be used to assist in clinical evaluation and decision-making.

P310. What barriers prevent patients being discharged from hospital following elective spine surgery?

P310. What barriers prevent patients being discharged from hospital following elective spine surgery?

Exploring Health Inequalities and Presurgical Attitudes on Postsurgical Outcomes in Spine Surgery

The influence of social determinants of health on health disparities is substantial. However, their impact on postsurgical outcomes in spine can be challenging to ascertain at the community level. This study aims to explore the interplay between presurgical attitudes, area deprivation index (ADI), income, employment status, and body mass index (BMI) on postsurgical outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after elective spine surgery. The study involved 127 patients who underwent elective spine surgery between August 2021 and August 2022 at a large academic institution. The main objective involved a prospective analysis of presurgical attitudes, coupled with a retrospective assessment of ADI, income, employment status, and BMI over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following elective spine surgery using a univariate analysis. Utilizing the univariate analyses, ADI displayed a significant correlation with increased Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Visual Analog Scale scores both before surgery and at the 3-, 6-, and 9-month postsurgical intervals (P < 0.05). One year after surgery, patients in the lowest income group (annual income under $25,000) consistently demonstrated the highest Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain (8.00, P= 0.022). Patients who were not employed had significantly lower levels of social support (P= 0.042) and confidence in the health care system (P= 0.009). Individuals who were unemployed were most likely to be readmitted six weeks after surgery (P < 0.001). Presurgical attitudes, ADI, income, employment status, and BMI were important factors associated with improved surgical outcome measurements, indicating potential focal points for combating health disparities in spinal surgery patients.

Dose-response relationship between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion and surgical site infections following spinal surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPerioperative allogeneic transfusion was generally considered to be safe. However, there had been some literatures reporting a potential association between surgical site infections (SSI) and blood transfusion. PURPOSETo determine whether perioperative blood transfusion increased the risk of SSI and to further explored whether there was a dose-response relationship. DESIGNRetrospective nested case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLEWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between July 2011 and July 2021. OUTCOME MEASUREIn the current study, the primary outcome measure was SSI. METHODSAll consecutive patients who underwent elective spinal surgery at our institution between July 2011 and July 2021 formed the retrospective cohort. Electronic patient record and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively in our electronic database. To examine the effects of mismatched variables, we further adjusted for possible confounding factors using conditional logistic regression models. Then, we explored the nonlinear relationship between perioperative blood transfusion and SSI by a smoothed curve, with the adjustments for potential confounders. If a nonlinear relationship was observed, a two-piecewise regression model would be performed to calculate the threshold effect. RESULTSThe average time from surgery to diagnosis of SSI was 20.5 days. We matched 248 controls to 124 SSI cases. Of the 124 patients who developed SSI, 84 patients (67.7%) had deep SSI, 40 patients (32.3%) had superficial SSI. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of SSI increased by 27% for each additional unit of blood transfusion. It can be seen from the curve fitting plot that the risk of SSI has a greater increase after blood transfusion >3U. Subsequent piecewise regression identified an inflection point of 3U. CONCLUSIONWe determined that 3U was a threshold volume of allogeneic blood transfusion that shifted the risk of SSI following spinal surgery, and there was a dose-response effect.

Osteoporosis Evaluation and Management in Spine Surgery.

Osteoporosis is a global health problem affecting over 200 million people worldwide and 54 million adults in the United States. Approximately half of all postmenopausal women will have an osteoporosis-related fracture during their lifetime. In the United States, the direct medical cost related to osteoporosis is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2025. Management of osteoporosis in vertebral fractures and elective spine surgery is of the utmost concern, given the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the general population and the increased risk of complication in this population. New pharmacologic treatment options such as anabolic medications and diagnostic tools including Hounsfield unit measurements on routine computed tomography scans are available to orthopaedic and spinal surgeons to help best manage this condition. This review serves as an update to diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery.

Patient Comorbidities, Their Influence on Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery, and Recommendations to Reduce Unfavorable Outcomes.

Improvements in healthcare management have led to a decrease in perioperative and postoperative complications. However, perioperative medical complications and mortality rates continue to increase in patients undergoing elective spinal surgeries. This trend is driven by the increase in the older population and the rise in the number of patients with more than two comorbidities. Managing patients with multiple comorbidities requires additional resources, augmenting the financial and societal burden. Despite the high risk of complications and mortality, patients with multiple comorbidities undergo spinal surgery for degenerative spinal conditions daily. These findings highlight the need for heightened awareness, patient education, and management of comorbidities before elective spinal surgeries. This article comprehensively reviews literature on the effects of medical comorbidities on spinal fusion surgery outcomes to increase awareness of the surgical complications associated with comorbidities. In addition, suggested preoperative and postoperative comorbidity management strategies are outlined.

The incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission within 90 days after surgical treatment of spinal fractures.

Unplanned readmissions after spine surgery are undesired, and cause significant functional, and financial distress to the patients and healthcare system. Though critical, knowledge about readmissions after surgery for traumatic spinal injuries (TSI) is scarce and under-evaluated. Consecutive patients surgically treated for TSI and who had unplanned readmission within 90 days post-discharge were studied. Peri-operative demographic and surgical variables, surgical treatment, level of injury, delay in surgery, ASIA score, other organ injuries, peri-operative complications, smoking, ICU stay, co-morbidity, and the length of hospital stay were studied and correlated with the causes for readmission. Among 884 patients, 4.98% (n = 44) had unplanned readmissions within 90 days of discharge. Notably, 50% (n = 22) patients were readmitted within the first 30 days. The common causes of readmissions were urinary tract related problems (27%, n = 12), pressure ulcers (20.4%, n = 9), respiratory problems (13.6%, n = 6), surgical wound related problems (14%, n = 7,) limb injuries (11.4%, n = 5), and others (11%, n = 5). The total beds lost secondary to readmissions was 314 days, and the mean bed-days lost per patient was 7.2 ± 5.1. Thirteen peri-operative risk factors were associated with unplanned readmissions, among which, smoking (OR 2.2), diabetes (OR 2.4), and pressure sore during index admission (OR 16.7) were strong independent predictors. The incidence of unplanned readmissions after TSI was 5%, which was similar to elective spine surgeries but the causes and risk factors are different. Non-surgical complications related to urinary tract, respiratory care and pressure sores were the most common causes. Pre-operative smoking status, diabetes mellitus and pressure sores noted in the index admission were important independent risk factors.

New Perspectives on Risk Assessment and Anticoagulation in Elective Spine Surgery Patients: The Impact of Ultra-Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery Techniques on Patients with Cardiac Disease.

The advent of ultra-minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery, characterized by significantly reduced surgery times, minimal blood loss, and minimal tissue trauma, has precipitated a paradigm shift in the preoperative management of patients with cardiac disease undergoing elective spine procedures. This perspective article explores how these advancements have influenced the requirements for preoperative cardiac workups and the protocols surrounding the cessation of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies. Traditionally, extensive cardiac evaluations and the need to stop anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents have posed challenges, increasing the risk of cardiac events and delaying surgical interventions. However, the reduced invasiveness of endoscopic spine surgery presents a safer profile for patients with cardiac comorbidities, potentially minimizing the necessity for rigorous cardiac clearance and allowing for more flexible anticoagulation management. This perspective article synthesizes current research and clinical practices to provide a comprehensive overview of these evolving protocols. It also discusses the implications of these changes for patient safety, surgical outcomes, and overall healthcare efficiency. Finally, the article suggests directions for future research, emphasizing the need for updated guidelines that reflect the reduced perioperative risk associated with these innovative surgical techniques. This discussion is pivotal for primary care physicians, surgeons, cardiologists, and the broader medical community in optimizing care for this high-risk patient population.

Immediate vs. delayed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following spine surgery: increased rate of unplanned reoperation for postoperative hematoma with immediate prophylaxis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThere is significant variability in postoperative chemoprophylaxis protocols amongst spine providers due to perceived risks and benefits, but limited data on the topic. At our institution, both orthopaedic spine and neurosurgery departments utilize unfractionated subcutaneous heparin in identical dosages and frequency, with the only difference being time to initiation postoperatively. PURPOSETo evaluate the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTEs) and unplanned reoperation for hematoma based on timing of chemoprophylaxis initiation. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGSingle institution retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing elective spine surgery, excluding patients undergoing surgery in the setting of trauma, malignancy, or infection OUTCOME MEASURESOutcome measures included the diagnosis of a venous thromboembolism within 90 days of surgery and unplanned reoperation for a hematoma METHODSPatients undergoing elective spine surgery from 2017 to 2021 were grouped based on chemoprophylaxis protocol. In the “immediate” group, patients received subcutaneous heparin 5000 units every 8 hours starting immediately after surgery, and in the “delayed” group, patients received chemoprophylaxis starting postoperative day (POD)-2 for any decompressions and/or fusions involving a spinal cord level (i.e., L2 and above) and POD-1 for those involving only levels below the spinal cord (i.e., L3 to pelvis). A cox proportional hazards model was created to assess independent predictors of venous thromboembolic events, while a logistic regression was utilized for unplanned reoperations for hematoma. RESULTSOf 8,704 patients, a total of 98 (1.13%) VTE events occurred, of which 43 (0.49%) were pulmonary embolism. Fifty-four patients (0.62%) had unplanned reoperations for postoperative hematomas. On cox proportional hazards model analysis, immediate chemoprophylaxis was not protective of a venous thromboembolism (Hazard Ratio: 1.18, p=.436), but, it was a significant independent predictor for unplanned reoperation for hematoma on multivariable logistic regression modeling (Odds Ratio: 3.29, p<.001). CONCLUSIONSBoth chemoprophylaxis protocols in our study resulted in low rates of VTE and postoperative hematoma. However, our findings suggest that the delayed chemoprophylaxis protocol may mitigate postoperative hematoma formation without increasing the risk for a thrombotic event.

Preoperative Opioid Use Increases Postoperative Opioid Demand, but Not Length of Stay After Spine Trauma Surgery

BackgroundPreoperative opioid use has been well-studied in elective spinal surgery and correlated with numerous postoperative complications including increases in immediate postoperative opioid demand (POD), continued opioid use postoperatively, prolonged length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and disability. There is a paucity of data available on the use of preoperative opioids in surgery for spine trauma, possibly because there are minimal options for opioid reduction prior to emergent spinal surgery. Nevertheless, patients with traumatic spinal injuries are at a high risk for adverse postoperative outcomes. This study investigated the effects of preoperative opioid use on POD and LOS in spine trauma patients. Methods130 patients were grouped into two groups for primary comparison: Group 1 (Preoperative Opioid Use, N=16) and Group 2 (No Opioid Use, N=114). Two subgroups of Group 2 were used for secondary analysis against Group 1: Group 3 (No Substance Abuse, N=95) and Group 4 (Other Substance Abuse, N=19). Multivariable analysis was used to determine if there were significant differences in POD and LOS. ResultsPrimary analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid users required an estimated 97.5 mg/day more opioid medications compared to non-opioid users (p<0.001). Neither primary nor secondary analysis showed a difference in LOS in any of the comparisons. ConclusionsPreoperative opioid users had increased POD compared to non-opioid users and patients abusing other substances, but there was no difference in LOS. We theorize the lack of difference in LOS may be due to the enhanced perioperative recovery protocol used, which has been demonstrated to reduce LOS.

Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database.

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Republic of Korea (ROK) experienced three epidemic waves in February, August, and November 2020. These waves, combined with the overarching pandemic, significantly influenced trends in spinal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery in ROK during the early COVID-19 pandemic, especially in relation to specific epidemic waves. Using the National Health Information Database in ROK, we identified all patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. A joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends in spinal surgeries over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of surgeries decreased following the first and second epidemic waves (p<0.01 and p = 0.34, respectively), but these were offset by compensatory increases later on (p<0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, the third epidemic wave did not lead to a decrease in surgical volume, and the total number of surgeries remained comparable to the period before the pandemic. When compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, average LOH was reduced by 1 day during the COVID-19 period (p<0.01), while mean hospital costs increased significantly from 3,511 to 4,061 USD (p<0.01). Additionally, the transfer rate and the 30-day readmission rate significantly decreased (both p<0.01), while the reoperation rate remained stable (p = 0.36). Despite the impact of epidemic waves on monthly surgery numbers, a subsequent compensatory increase was observed, indicating that surgical care has adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. This adaptability, along with the stable total number of operations, highlights the potential for healthcare systems to continue elective spine surgery during public health crises with strategic resource allocation and patient triage. Policies should ensure that surgeries for degenerative spinal diseases, particularly those not requiring urgent care but crucial for patient quality of life, are not unnecessarily halted.

Effect of desflurane anesthesia on flash visual evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFlash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) are a reliable method for protecting visual function during spine surgery in prone position. However, the popularization and application of FVEPs remain limited due to the unclear influence of various anesthetics on FVEPs. Exploring the effects of anesthetic drugs on FVEP and establishing appropriate anesthesia maintenance methods are particularly important for promoting and applying FVEP. According to the conventional concept, inhaled narcotic drugs significantly affect the success of FVEP monitoring, FVEP extraction, and interpretation. Nonetheless, our previous study demonstrated that sevoflurane-propofol balanced anesthesia was a practicable regimen for FVEPs. Desflurane is widely used in general anesthesia for its rapid recovery properties. As the effect of desflurane on FVEP remains unclear, this trial will investigate the effect of different inhaled concentrations of desflurane anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs during spine surgery, aiming to identify more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEP.Methods/ designA total of 70 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, patient-assessor-blinded, superiority trial and randomly assigned to the low inhaled concentration of desflurane group (LD group) maintained with desflurane-propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia or high inhaled concentration of desflurane group (HD group) maintained with desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia maintenance group at a ratio of 1:1. All patients will be monitored for intraoperative FVEPs, and the baseline will be measured half an hour after induction under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). After that, patients will receive 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane combined with propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance in the LD group, while 0.7–1.0 MAC of desflurane and remifentanil will be maintained in the HD group. The primary outcome is the N75-P100 amplitude 1 h after the induction of anesthesia. We intend to use the dual measure evaluation, dual data entry, and statistical analysis by double trained assessors to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results.DiscussionThis randomized controlled trial aims to explore the superiority effect of low inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia versus high inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs. The study is meant to be published in a peer-reviewed journal and might guide the anesthetic regimen for FVEPs. The conclusion is expected to provide high-quality evidence for the effect of desflurane on FVEPs and aim to explore more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEPs and visual function protection.Trial registrationThis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on July 15, 2022. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05465330.

Effects of liposomal bupivacaine on opioid use and healthcare resource utilization after outpatient spine surgery: a real-world assessment

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPerioperative pain management affects cost and outcomes in elective spine surgery. PURPOSEThis study investigated the association between liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and outpatient spine surgery outcomes, including perioperative, postoperative, and postdischarge opioid use and healthcare resource utilization. STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLEEligibility criteria included adults with ≥6 months of continuous data before and after outpatient spine procedures including discectomy, laminectomy, or lumbar fusion. Patients receiving LB were matched 1:3 to patients receiving non-LB analgesia by propensity scores. OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes included (1) opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) during the perioperative and postdischarge periods and (2) postdischarge readmission and emergency department (ED) visits up to 3 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with appropriate distributions was used for analysis. METHODSDeidentified data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases (2016-2019) were used for the analysis. This study was funded by Pacira BioSciences, Inc. RESULTSIn total, 381 patients received LB and 1143 patients received non-LB analgesia. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after propensity score matching. The LB cohort used fewer MMEs versus the non-LB cohort before discharge (80 vs 132 MMEs [mean difference, −52 MMEs; p=.0041]). Following discharge, there was a nonsignificant reduction in opioid use in the LB cohort versus the non-LB cohort within 90 days (429 vs 480 MMEs [mean difference, −50 MMEs; p=.289]) and from >90 days to 180 days (349 vs 381 MMEs [mean difference, −31 MMEs; p=.507]). The LB cohort had significantly lower rates of ED visits at 2 months after discharge versus the non-LB cohort (3.9% vs 7.6% [odds ratio, 0.50; p=.015]). Postdischarge readmission rates did not differ between cohorts. CONCLUSIONSUse of LB for outpatient spine surgery was associated with reduced opioid use at the hospital and nonsignificant reduction in opioid use at all postoperative timepoints examined through 90 days after surgery versus non-LB analgesia. ED visit rates were significantly lower at 60 days after discharge. These findings support reduced cost and improved quality metrics in patients treated with LB versus non-LB analgesia for outpatient spine surgery.

Super-elderly, spinal surgery, evaluating the risks and benefits: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

An increasingly ageing population presents emerging healthcare challenges. Adequate clinical evaluation and understanding of outcome-predicting factors are integral to delivering safe spinal surgery to super-elderly patients. To evaluate spine surgery outcomes in patients aged 80 or above. We retrospectively evaluated patients 80 years and above who underwent elective or emergency spinal surgery between 2017 and 2022. The Eurospine Surgery Classification (ESC) was used to classify operations into Large, Medium, and Small. We calculated and compared Clinical Frailty Scores (CFS) pre- and post-operatively. Two hundred forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were male (n = 145). The age range was 80 to 99 (mean 83.3). Most operations were elective (n = 151, 62%). In our cohort, 211, 22, 10,2 and 1patients had degenerative, trauma, tumour, infective and vascular pathologies, respectively. According to the Eurospine classification, 201 (82.0%) had Minor spine surgery (63 emergently and 138 electively), 38 had Medium surgery (15.5% - 30 emergently and 8 electively), and 6 had Large surgery (2.4% - 1 emergently and 5 electively). 163 (66.5%) were discharged or under follow-up. There were 11 in-patient mortalities (4.5%). Outpatient mortality was 51 (20.8%), with the median time from surgery to death being 504.5 days, all the outpatient mortalities were neither non-spinal pathology nor spinal surgical related. CFS improved across the cohort, from 5 pre-operatively to 4 post-operatively (p < 0.001). Spine surgery in those over the 80s can be performed safely and improve their quality of life, as demonstrated by improvements in the CFS. Good patient selection and adequate pre-operative workup is essential, although it may not be possible in emergencies.