Elective Primary Total Knee Replacement Research Articles

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of elective primary total knee replacement with PAtellar Resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing: a pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled Trial (PART).

During total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons can choose whether or not to resurface the patella, with advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended always resurfacing the patella, rather than never doing so. NICE found insufficient evidence on selective resurfacing (surgeon's decision based on intraoperative findings and symptoms) to make recommendations. If effective, selective resurfacing could result in optimal individualized patient care. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary TKR with always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. The PAtellar Resurfacing Trial (PART) is a patient- and assessor-blinded multicentre, pragmatic parallel two-arm randomized superiority trial of adults undergoing elective primary TKR for primary osteoarthritis at NHS hospitals in England, with an embedded internal pilot phase (ISRCTN 33276681). Participants will be randomly allocated intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis (stratified by centre and implant type (cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-sacrificing)) to always resurface or selectively resurface the patella, once the surgeon has confirmed sufficient patellar thickness for resurfacing and that constrained implants are not required. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures at three months, six months, and one year (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, OKS, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, need for further surgery, resource use, and costs). Cost-effectiveness will be measured for the lifetime of the patient. Overall, 530 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect a four-point difference in OKS between the groups one year after surgery, assuming up to 40% resurfacing in the selective group. The trial findings will provide evidence about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. This will inform future NICE guidelines on primary TKR and the role of selective patellar resurfacing.

USING THE CAPABILITY, OPPORTUNITY, AND MOTIVATION MODEL OF BEHAVIOUR (COM-B) TO IMPLEMENT A PATHWAY TO REDUCE 30-DAY ELECTIVE EMERGENCY ADMISSIONS

AbstractIntroduction30-day emergency readmission is an indicator of treatment related complication once discharged, resulting in readmission. A board-approved quality improvement pathway was introduced to reduce elective re-admissions.MethodThe pathway involved telephone and email contact details provision to patients for any non-life threatening medical assistance, allowing for initial nurse led management of all issues. A new clinic room available 7 days, and same day ultrasound scanning for DVT studies were introduced. A capability, opportunity and behavior model of change was implemented.Readmission rates before and six months after implementation were collected from Model Hospital. A database used to document patient communications was interrogated for patient outcomes.ResultsPrior to implementation, readmission rates following elective primary total knee replacement (TKR) at the 1st business quarter of 2021 (April – June 2021), was 8.7%, (benchmark 3.8%). Following implementation, readmission rates decreased to 4.1% (October – December 2021). 54% of patients making contact were managed with telephone advice. 15% of patients required face-to-face clinic. 32% of those required a same day scan to exclude DVT (1/4).20 out of 684 TKRs performed following protocol introduction were re-admitted within 30 days. Readmissions were 41% surgical, 29% medical. 52% were unaware of the newly implemented protocol. Further improvements have been made to the protocol based on these findings.Implementation of a suitable pathway can significantly reduce re-admission rates in our center and could be used to reduce readmission rates in other national elective treatment centers.

Fatal pulmonary embolism following elective total knee replacement using aspirin in multi-modal prophylaxis — A 12 year study

BackgroundThe National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued guidelines on which thromboprophylaxis regimens are suitable following lower limb arthroplasty. Aspirin is not a recommended agent despite being accepted in orthopaedic guidelines elsewhere. We assessed the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality following elective primary total knee replacement (TKR) with a standardised multi-modal prophylaxis regime in a large teaching district general hospital. MethodsWe utilised a prospective audit database to identify those that had died within 42 and 90days postoperatively. Data from April 2000 to 2012 were analysed for 42 and 90day mortality rates. There were a total of 8277 elective primary TKR performed over the 12year period. The multi-modal prophylaxis regimen used unless contraindicated for all patients included 75mg aspirin once daily for four weeks. Case note review ascertained the causes of death. Where a patient had been referred to the coroner, they were contacted for post mortem results. ResultsThe mortality rates at 42 and 90days were 0.36 and 0.46%. There was one fatal PE within 42days of surgery (0.01%) who was taking enoxaparin because of aspirin intolerance. Two fatal PE’s occurred at 48 and 57days post-operatively (0.02%). The leading cause of death was myocardial infarction (0.13%). ConclusionsFatal PE following elective TKR with a multi-modal prophylaxis regime is a very rare cause of mortality.

Effectiveness of structured exercise program on the functional outcomes in total knee replacement

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) surgery has become the most successful surgery for patients with severe debilitating arthritis. Numerous factors influence the outcomes in TKR Post-operative physiotherapy and rehabilitation greatly influences the outcome of TKR. Despite the high incidence of TKR in recent years there is no post-operative rehabilitation approach being incorporated correctly to address the muscular and functional deficits following surgery. Objective: The main objective of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of structured rehabilitation program on the functional outcome of patients following total knee replacement. Materials & Methods: All patients who were planned to undergo elective primary TKR were recruited. Subjects posted for revision TKR, rheumatoid arthritis posted for TKR, immediate post-operative complications like deep vein thrombosis, signs of infection, TKR for Post-fracture cases were excluded. Eighty subjects enrolled for the study were randomly allocated to control and experimental group using simple random sampling. The control group receives standard care and experimental group receive structured exercise program comprising range of motion, staged training of quadriceps, vastus medialis strengthening exercises, early balance training and functional retraining. Outcomes including pain severity, knee joint mobility, isometric muscle strength, six minute walk test and functional outcome using KOOS scale were measured post-surgery and after 3 months follow up. Results: In experimental group, follow up measures of pain severity (p-.0001), knee joint extension range (p-.0016), isometric strength of hamstrings (p-0008) shows statistically significant results than control group. Whereas, in experimental group, follow up measures of knee flexion range (p-< .0001), isometric strength of quadriceps (p-

The influence of diabetes mellitus on the post-operative outcome of elective primary total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective method of treating end-stage arthritis of the knee. It is not, however, a procedure without risk due to a number of factors, one of which is diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to estimate the general prevalence of diabetes in patients about to undergo primary TKR and to determine whether diabetes mellitus adversely affects the outcome. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. The Odds Ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were used to represent the estimate of risk of a specific outcome. Our results showed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among patients undergoing TKR was 12.2%. Patients with diabetes mellitus had an increased risk of deep infection (OR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38 to 1.88), deep vein thrombosis (in Asia, OR = 2.57, 95% CI, 1.58 to 4.20), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 1.89, 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.45), aseptic loosening (OR = 9.36, 95% CI, 4.63 to 18.90), and a poorer Knee Society function subscore (MD = -5.86, 95% CI, -10.27 to -1.46). Surgeons should advise patients specifically about these increased risks when obtaining informed consent and be meticulous about their peri-operative care.

Comparison of the relative analgesic efficacies of epidural or intramuscular diamorphine following total knee arthroplasty

Debate has proliferated as to the true site of action of opioids when placed in the epidural space. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of a bolus of diamorphine given by the epidural or intramuscular route. Sixty patients having elective primary total knee replacements were recruited and randomized to receive epidural or intramuscular diamorphine. A lumbar epidural catheter was sited and 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% wt vol-1 was injected. Patients subsequently received diamorphine 5 mg into the epidural space or as an intramuscular injection. Patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine was used for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome measures included time to first patient-controlled analgesia use and total morphine consumption in 24 h. Secondary end-points considered possible treatment complications. All primary end-points showed significant differences in favour of epidural diamorphine. Medians for times to first patient-controlled analgesia use and total 24 h morphine requirements were significantly different (P < 0.001) at 418 vs. 198 min and 11 vs. 39 mg, respectively. There were no significant differences in secondary end-points. This study has shown the superior analgesic efficacy of epidural diamorphine when compared to intramuscular injection.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN HOSPITAL AND SURGEON PROCEDURE VOLUME AND THE OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

The annual volume of major cardiovascular and oncologic procedures performed in hospitals and by surgeons has been inversely associated with the rates of perioperative mortality and complications. The relationship between hospital and surgeon volume and perioperative outcomes following total knee replacement has received little study. We analyzed claims data for Medicare patients who had elective primary total knee replacement between January 1 and August 31, 2000. Hospital and surgeon volumes were defined as the number of primary and revision total knee replacements performed in the hospital or by the surgeon in Medicare recipients in 2000. We examined the associations between the annual volumes of total knee replacement performed in the hospitals and by the surgeons and the rates of mortality and complications (infection, pulmonary embolus, myocardial infarction, or pneumonia) in the first ninety days postoperatively. The analyses were adjusted for age, gender, comorbid conditions, Medicaid eligibility (a marker of low income), and arthritis diagnosis. Analyses of hospital volume were adjusted for surgeon volume and vice versa. Twenty-five percent of the primary total knee replacements were done by surgeons who performed twelve of these procedures or fewer in the Medicare population annually, and 11% were done in hospitals with an annual volume of twenty-five of these procedures or fewer. Compared with the patients who had a primary total knee replacement in hospitals with an annual volume of twenty-five procedures or fewer, those managed in hospitals with an annual volume exceeding 200 procedures had a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.65; 99% confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.90) and any of the adverse outcomes examined (death, pneumonia, pulmonary embolus, acute myocardial infarction, or deep infection) (odds ratio, 0.74; 99% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.90). Similarly, patients who had a primary total knee replacement done by surgeons who performed more than fifty such procedures in Medicare recipients annually had a lower risk of pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.72; 99% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.95) and any adverse outcome (odds ratio, 0.81; 99% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.98) compared with patients of surgeons with an annual volume of twelve procedures or fewer. Patients managed at hospitals and by surgeons with greater volumes of total knee replacement have lower risks of perioperative adverse events following primary total knee replacement. Patients and clinicians should incorporate these findings into discussions about selecting a surgeon and a hospital for total knee replacement. These data should also be integrated into the policy debate about the advantages and drawbacks of regionalizing total joint replacement to high-volume centers.

Cognitive Effects After Epidural vs General Anesthesia in Older Adults

To compare the effect of epidural vs general anesthesia on the incidence of long-term cognitive dysfunction after total knee replacement surgery in older adults. Randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthopedic specialty academic hospital. A total of 262 patients undergoing elective primary total knee replacement with a median age of 69 years; 70% women. Random assignment to either epidural or general anesthesia. A thorough neuropsychological assessment was performed preoperatively and repeated at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively. Cognitive outcome was assessed by within-patient change on 10 tests of memory, psychomotor, and language skills. Prospective standardized surveillance for cardiovascular complications was performed to allow simultaneous assessment of anesthetic effects on cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes. The two groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, sex, comorbidity, and cognitive function. There were no significant differences between the epidural and general anesthesia groups in within-subject change from baseline on any of the 10 cognitive test results at either 1 week or 6 months. Overall, 5% of patients showed a long-term clinically significant deterioration in cognitive function. There was no difference between the anesthesia groups in the incidence of major cardiovascular complications (3% overall). The type of anesthesia, general or epidural, does not affect the magnitude or pattern of postoperative cognitive dysfunction or the incidence of major cardiovascular complications in older adults undergoing elective total knee replacement. This is the largest trial of the effects of general vs regional anesthesia on cerebral function reported to date, with more than 99% power to detect a clinically significant difference on any of the neuropsychological tests.